reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The discussion begins with a critique of university policies regarding free speech, particularly in the context of anti-Semitism and hate speech. The hosts, Brian Keating and Danny Jones, reference a video featuring Harvard deans who claim that calling for violence against Jews is not hate speech unless acted upon. They argue that this reflects moral cowardice and a failure of universities to uphold principles of free speech. Danny mentions that Dave Portnoy has decided not to hire students from certain universities due to their handling of these issues, highlighting a broader trend of prestigious universities prioritizing job security over moral integrity. They discuss the significant endowments of these institutions, suggesting that their financial stability allows them to ignore public backlash. The conversation shifts to the implications of free speech on campuses, particularly regarding the treatment of Jewish students and the rise of anti-Semitism following recent events in the Middle East. They recount incidents at UC San Diego where anti-Semitic symbols were displayed, and students rallied in support of Palestinian "martyrs," indicating a troubling campus climate. Danny expresses concern over the influence of external ideologies on students, questioning whether their beliefs stem from genuine conviction or outside manipulation. He contrasts the democratic nature of Israel with the oppressive regimes in Gaza, arguing that the portrayal of Israel as an apartheid state is misleading. The hosts also discuss the academic environment, noting that many professors self-censor to avoid backlash, and they reflect on the changing nature of academic discourse. They mention Claudine Gay, the president of Harvard, and allegations of her academic misconduct, drawing parallels to historical instances of censorship and revisionism. The conversation touches on the challenges facing academia, particularly regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, which they argue can stifle free speech. They highlight the hypocrisy of those who suddenly advocate for free speech after a crisis, despite having previously suppressed dissenting opinions. The discussion then transitions to the topic of UFOs and alien life, with Brian expressing skepticism about claims of extraterrestrial technology. They analyze the motivations behind such claims, questioning the credibility of whistleblowers and the likelihood of government cover-ups. Danny emphasizes the importance of scientific rigor and skepticism, arguing that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. They conclude by discussing the potential for advanced technology and the implications of extraterrestrial life, suggesting that the pursuit of knowledge and understanding should remain grounded in scientific inquiry rather than speculation. The hosts advocate for a focus on improving education and addressing pressing global challenges rather than seeking solutions in distant worlds.

Theo Von explains that today’s discussion aims to deepen understanding of the Israel–Palestine conflict and that he invited guests from multiple perspectives. Rabbi David Wolpe, a prominent American rabbi, shares his experiences and views, including a recent visit to Israel and his observations about the country’s mood and dangers. Wolpe describes Israel as resilient but depressed, noting students at the Tech who miss school due to war and a society living with imminent danger. He emphasizes how close Israel is to Gaza and the West Bank and that the country must defend itself, while acknowledging public discontent with the government, including Netanyahu’s declining popularity and calls for accountability after October 7. On leadership and policy, Wolpe argues that the public’s mistrust of elite institutions has grown, touching on media, AI, and the difficulty of discerning truth. He notes that 66% of Israelis want Netanyahu out of politics and 85% favor an investigation into October 7. He cautions against attributing new failures to malice, suggesting incompetence is a frequent driver of missteps. The conversation widens to campus life and American universities, recounting Harvard’s anti‑Semitism commission and the campus protests that followed October 7. He explains how donors pulled support and how the controversy extended beyond Israel to broader political and cultural debates, challenging the balance between free speech and respectful discourse. Historically, Wolpe provides a capsule history: Jews have prayed to return to Israel for thousands of years, land purchases in the 1800s, the UN partition, and the 1948 war in which Arab armies attacked Israel. He outlines subsequent wars, the peace with Egypt and Jordan, and repeated Palestinian leadership refusals of peace offers, including Camp David 2000, while underscoring that reasons for conflict run deep in religion, identity, and politics. The podcast then addresses the refugee question, Palestinian governance in the West Bank and Gaza, and the role of Hamas, as well as the potential for economic and technological cooperation if leaders choose peace. Wolpe emphasizes humane treatment of civilians, the need for courage, and the possibility of change, citing Saul/Paul, and the Jewish tradition of dignity toward all people. Closing themes include faith’s role in community, the importance of dialogue across divides, and the hope that visionary leadership can end carnage and advance peace.

In this episode of the Rubin Report, hosts Dave Rubin, Andy Ngo, and Colin Wright discuss the recent resignation of Harvard's president, Claudine Gay, following a plagiarism scandal. Colin reflects on his political journey, noting how he feels abandoned by the left due to their shift away from core values like free speech and meritocracy. Andy highlights the radicalization of the mainstream left in the U.S. compared to Europe, emphasizing the alarming nature of ideologies like Critical Race Theory. They also address the implications of Gay's resignation, suggesting it represents a significant victory against DEI ideologies. The conversation shifts to the broader cultural landscape, including the appointment of a female director for a new Star Wars film, which they criticize for prioritizing activism over storytelling. Finally, they touch on the ongoing migrant crisis at the U.S. border, noting that increased visibility may lead to political shifts among Democrats. The hosts conclude with a sense of cautious optimism about potential pushback against radical ideologies.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing the rise of anti-Semitism in America, highlighting recent incidents such as the destruction of menorahs in Oakland and Harvard. She welcomes Bari Weiss, who emphasizes the shift in perspectives among many in the Jewish community since the October 7th attacks in Israel. Weiss recounts an anecdote about a young woman who transitioned from a progressive liberal to a conservative after witnessing the anti-Semitic sentiments expressed by supposed allies. Weiss discusses the impact of DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) ideologies, explaining how they create crude racial categories that often misrepresent Jewish identity. She notes that many Jews feel vulnerable despite being perceived as part of a privileged group. The conversation touches on the complexities of racial dynamics in America, particularly regarding the black community's views on Israel, and how DEI frameworks can distort historical contexts. Kelly and Weiss also address the implications of recent political decisions, such as Chicago's mayor's plans to eliminate high-achieving schools to promote equity, which they argue undermines meritocracy and harms students of color. They express concern over the increasing racialization of American society and the potential consequences of such ideologies. The discussion shifts to the media landscape, particularly the New York Times, with Weiss referencing a piece by James Bennett that critiques the paper's ideological capture and lack of courage in reporting. They discuss how the Times has shifted from a commitment to journalistic integrity to a narrative-driven approach that alienates a significant portion of its readership. Kelly and Weiss conclude with a discussion on the ongoing conflict in Gaza and the rise of anti-Semitism in Europe, emphasizing the need for a robust defense of Jewish identity and values in the face of hostility. They express hope for a growing coalition against anti-woke ideologies and a return to principles that promote tolerance and understanding. The show also features discussions on various legal issues, including the upcoming Supreme Court cases involving Donald Trump and the implications of his legal challenges on the political landscape. The hosts analyze the potential outcomes of these cases and their significance for the future of American democracy.

On January 23, 2024, Dave Rubin discussed the recent surge in viewership for his show, attributing it to a growing pushback against diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) ideologies in America. He noted that this backlash is evident across various sectors, including politics, sports, and education, with many individuals, including MMA fighters and political figures, openly rejecting DEI principles. Rubin emphasized that DEI promotes mediocrity and undermines meritocracy, particularly in critical institutions like the military. He connected the decline in DEI support to the shocking events of October 7, when a brutal attack by Hamas on Israel occurred, leading to a reevaluation of leftist ideologies among many Americans. Rubin highlighted the absurdity of coalitions formed in support of Hamas, noting that they often include groups that would be persecuted under Hamas rule. He criticized the modern left for promoting a narrative that equates perceived oppression with moral superiority, arguing that this perspective is fundamentally flawed. Rubin also addressed the confusion surrounding DEI among well-intentioned individuals like Mark Cuban, who he believes are misguided rather than malicious. He contrasted this with figures like Joy Reid, who he views as intentionally promoting harmful ideologies. The discussion extended to the implications of DEI on various sectors, including the military and law enforcement, where Rubin argued that lowering standards in favor of diversity compromises effectiveness and safety. Finally, he called for a return to meritocracy and individualism, suggesting that societies that embrace these values are more likely to thrive and innovate. Rubin concluded by encouraging a vision of progress that focuses on collective achievements rather than divisive identity politics.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing the current state of top colleges in America, particularly focusing on Harvard and its president, Claudine Gay. She criticizes Gay for her perceived failure to condemn anti-Semitism and for her alleged history of plagiarism, suggesting that Harvard has shifted from its educational mission to promoting a woke agenda. In contrast, she notes that the University of Pennsylvania's president, Liz McGill, resigned after a poor congressional performance regarding free speech and anti-Semitism. Andrew Klavan joins the discussion, emphasizing that the issues at these universities reflect a broader philosophy that places Jews in a unique position of vulnerability. He argues that this reflects a rejection of Western civilization and that the backlash against anti-Semitism is growing. Klavan expresses hope that more people are recognizing the dangers of this ideology, despite the challenges posed by the current cultural climate. The conversation shifts to the hypocrisy of university policies regarding free speech and the treatment of conservative voices. Klavan highlights specific cases of individuals who faced backlash for expressing conservative views, contrasting this with the lack of consequences for those who promote anti-Semitic rhetoric. He argues that the current environment stifles genuine discourse and promotes a culture of fear. The discussion then transitions to the political landscape, with Carl Higbie joining to discuss his success in turning a blue town, Greenwich, Connecticut, red. He explains the challenges Republicans face in messaging and mobilizing voters, particularly in a state dominated by Democrats. Higbie emphasizes the importance of local issues, such as gas prices and housing policies, in persuading voters. He advocates for a more aggressive approach to campaigning, including door-to-door outreach and early voting initiatives. Higbie also critiques the Republican National Committee's leadership and strategy, suggesting that they need to adopt more effective grassroots organizing tactics. He stresses the importance of engaging with voters on local concerns and adapting to the current political climate, including utilizing ballot harvesting strategies employed by Democrats. The show concludes with a discussion on the cultural impact of figures like Taylor Swift, who recently supported a fundraiser for Gaza, and the implications of such actions on her fanbase, particularly among Jewish Americans. Kelly and her guests express concern over the broader societal trends that undermine traditional values and the rights of women, particularly in the context of gender identity debates. They call for a cultural shift that embraces truth and accountability in the face of rising ideological extremism.

In recent weeks, a conflict between Harvard University and the Trump administration has been framed by the media as a war, but it reflects deeper issues within higher education. Jordan Peterson argues that the corruption in universities, particularly Ivy League institutions, has significant cultural implications since these institutions shape future leaders. He critiques diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, claiming they prioritize group identity over individual merit, leading to systemic corruption. Harvard's massive endowment, valued at $53.2 billion, allows it to resist federal demands for reform, despite threats to its funding and tax-exempt status. Peterson highlights that the ideological bias in academia is stark, with only about 3% of faculty identifying as conservative, which undermines the integrity of research and education. He asserts that DEI mandates have infiltrated hiring and promotion processes, compromising academic standards. The situation at McGill University in Canada mirrors these issues, with accreditation bodies increasingly focusing on DEI rather than merit. Peterson emphasizes that the decline in trust in higher education stems from its failure to uphold academic integrity, and he advocates for alternative educational models like Peterson Academy and Hillsdale College. He concludes that the current state of universities is unsalvageable, necessitating a complete overhaul rather than mere reform.

Universities are at a crossroads where culture and policy collide, and this episode probes how the Trump administration aimed to reshape elite higher education from the inside out. May Mailman argues that the core problem is not isolated incidents but a broader culture of victimhood and identity-first policies that shape who is hired, admitted, and heard. The conversation centers on federal leverage, especially Title six protections, and the administration’s view that universities receiving federal funds should lead with merit while curbing what they call ‘DEI’ activism. The host even notes Buckley’s God and Man at Yale as an early touchstone for the critique of campus liberalism. The aim is to reform incentives at the institution level rather than targeting individuals. Mailman discusses the diagnosis of the campus climate: a glorification of victimhood that some say harms admissions and hiring by privileging minority status over demonstrated merit. She recalls her own experiences across Kansas and Harvard, noting the Ferguson protests context and the sense of communal action, while questioning how speech constraints and online echo chambers amplified division. She also explains that she identified as conservative, which drew her toward the Trump movement, complicating the question of how protest culture and social media shaped ideas about safety, dialogue, and dissent on campuses. On policy, Mailman describes day-one actions: executive orders and Title VI investigations that push schools to curb discrimination while maintaining safety. The administration sought to move from investigations to settlements, using examples like Brown and Colombia to signal seriousness while arguing these were modest endowment-relative penalties. A formal framework would ask institutions to pledge merit-based admissions and hiring, minimize reliance on foreign students, and ensure intellectual diversity department by department without micromanaging speech. The exchange covers the tension between anti-Semitism concerns and broader critiques of campus debate and Israel critiques. Looking ahead, the goal is a higher education landscape where merit determines admissions, hiring, and research, with tighter federal oversight alongside donor-supported innovation. Mailman suggests that competition could shift prestige toward institutions embracing a genuine merit ethos, including alternatives to the traditional model such as Hillsdale’s funding approach. The conversation closes with a recognition that culture change requires both government leverage and voluntary reform, and that a healthier balance could encourage more diverse intellectual environments while preserving free inquiry.

Chris Williamson interviews Eric Weinstein, discussing the current state of Harvard and academia, the role of power and privilege, and the implications of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. Weinstein expresses concern over the decline of academic rigor and the intertwining of brilliance and power at institutions like Harvard, which he believes is losing its prestige due to a lack of open discourse. Weinstein critiques the narrative-driven approach of Harvard and other institutions, likening it to the editorial practices of The New York Times, where narratives often overshadow factual accuracy. He shares personal experiences, including being barred from attending his own thesis defense, highlighting the opaque and sometimes arbitrary nature of academic processes. The conversation shifts to the challenges faced by Claudine Gay, the president of Harvard, who Weinstein claims faced scrutiny for her handling of free speech policies and academic integrity. He argues that the academic world is plagued by "attribution bullying," where credit for work is often misallocated, and that the current academic environment stifles genuine inquiry and discovery. Weinstein also discusses the implications of DEI initiatives, suggesting that they may prioritize inclusion over merit and lead to a dilution of academic standards. He emphasizes the importance of maintaining a rigorous academic environment that values truth and discovery over political correctness. The discussion touches on the broader societal implications of these trends, including the rise of mental health issues among young people, particularly boys, who feel alienated by contemporary educational practices. Weinstein argues for a return to traditional values that recognize the importance of male and female roles in society. As the conversation progresses, Weinstein reflects on the nature of belief and the role of religion in providing a framework for understanding the world. He suggests that while he identifies as an atheist, he acknowledges the value of religious narratives and the communal aspects of faith. The interview concludes with Weinstein expressing hope for the future of science and academia, emphasizing the need for innovative thinking and a return to foundational principles that prioritize genuine inquiry and understanding. He calls for a cultural renaissance that embraces the complexities of human experience while fostering an environment where truth can flourish.

Dave Rubin and Douglas Murray discuss significant events surrounding Harvard University, particularly the resignation of Claudine Gay as president after a brief tenure marked by controversy. Gay's resignation follows her poor performance during a Congressional hearing regarding anti-Semitism and allegations of plagiarism in her academic work. Murray critiques the notion of a two-state solution in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, arguing that Hamas would likely win any elections in the West Bank, undermining the legitimacy of the Palestinian Authority. He highlights the selective outrage of some activists who focus on Jewish issues while ignoring other global atrocities. The conversation emphasizes the need for continued scrutiny of institutions like Harvard, which they claim are complicit in fostering anti-Semitism and failing to uphold academic integrity. They also note a decline in Harvard's early action applications, suggesting a shift in public perception. The hosts conclude by stressing the importance of persistence in challenging woke ideologies and institutional failures, advocating for accountability and transparency in academia.

Megyn Kelly hosts the show live from the University of Alabama, where she will co-moderate the fourth Republican presidential debate. With the Iowa caucuses approaching, the debate features the smallest number of candidates yet: Ron DeSantis, Nikki Haley, Vivek Ramaswamy, and Chris Christie. Former President Trump is not expected to attend. Doug Burgum has dropped out of the race, leaving a more focused field. Kelly discusses the significance of the debate, noting that it could be pivotal for candidates to distinguish themselves. Charles C.W. Cooke emphasizes that the race has been stagnant, and the debate could provide insights into who might emerge as a viable alternative to Trump. Michael Brendan Dougherty adds that the debates are crucial for candidates to express their positions on key issues, even if they don’t ultimately win the nomination. The conversation shifts to Trump’s legal troubles, with Kelly referencing a piece by Andy McCarthy about Trump’s potential conviction and its implications for the Republican Party. Dougherty notes the unusual circumstances surrounding the election, suggesting that the debates matter for shaping public perception and candidate positioning. As the debate approaches, Kelly highlights the need for substantive questions that challenge candidates rather than allowing them to recite talking points. She expresses concern that if Trump continues to dominate the polls, future debates may be canceled altogether. The discussion also touches on the Democratic side, particularly President Biden's recent gaffes and the challenges he faces in a potential debate against Trump. Cooke and Dougherty agree that the current political landscape is fraught with uncertainty, and the lack of vigorous debate could lead to a troubling election cycle. In a later segment, the focus shifts to rising anti-Semitism on college campuses, particularly at Harvard and Cornell. Kelly and her guests criticize university leaders for their inadequate responses to hate speech and the hypocrisy of promoting free speech while allowing anti-Semitic rhetoric. They argue that the DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) framework often marginalizes Jewish voices and fails to address the complexities of anti-Zionism versus anti-Semitism. The show concludes with a discussion on the broader implications of these issues for American society, emphasizing the need for accountability and a return to principles of free speech and open discourse in educational institutions.

Dave Rubin reflects on the third anniversary of January 6th, discussing the decline of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) ideologies in America. He highlights a shift in public perception, suggesting that many are recognizing the indoctrination of generations through academia. Rubin cites Dr. Deborah Soh's discussion with Joe Rogan about Yuri Bezmenov, a former KGB agent who explained ideological subversion as a method to demoralize a nation over decades. This process involves teaching young people to view their country's founding negatively, leading to societal confusion and hysteria. Rubin connects this to current events, particularly at institutions like Harvard, which has faced plagiarism scandals linked to DEI practices. He critiques the Dallas Mavericks' CEO, Cynthia Marshall, for prioritizing DEI over the team's performance, arguing that such initiatives detract from business objectives. He contrasts this with Elon Musk's stance against DEI, labeling it as a form of racism. Rubin also discusses the political landscape, emphasizing the need for a shift away from the binary choices of Trump or Biden. He suggests that voters, particularly in Iowa, have the power to influence the direction of the Republican Party. He concludes by urging viewers to challenge the prevailing ideologies and support candidates who prioritize merit over identity politics, advocating for a more honest and effective political discourse.

Dave Rubin discusses the rise of Javier Milei, the new president of Argentina, who advocates for limited government and opposes social justice ideologies, claiming they lead to destruction rather than creation. Rubin highlights a recent congressional hearing where university presidents from Harvard, MIT, and Penn were questioned about anti-Semitism on their campuses, particularly in relation to calls for genocide against Jews. The presidents' evasive responses, suggesting that such calls might not violate their codes of conduct depending on context, sparked outrage. Rubin compares this to Jordan Peterson's past warnings about the totalitarian ideologies driving leftist activism, which he argues could lead to violence. He emphasizes that the current state of elite universities reflects a broader cultural decay influenced by social justice movements. Rubin also critiques the influence of figures like Ibram X. Kendi and the corporate push for diversity initiatives, arguing they undermine meritocracy. He concludes by urging individuals to build new institutions and alternatives to the current systems, as traditional entities like Disney and Netflix have become vehicles for harmful ideologies.

Megyn Kelly welcomes Alan Dershowitz to discuss various pressing topics, starting with the ongoing legal challenges facing former President Trump, particularly regarding alleged hush money payments to Stormy Daniels. Dershowitz critiques the motivations behind these prosecutions, suggesting they reflect a dangerous trend of weaponizing the legal system against political opponents. He emphasizes that the pursuit of Trump appears to be more about political vendetta than genuine legal violations, warning that such actions could undermine the integrity of the justice system. The conversation shifts to the implications of Trump's potential indictment in New York, where the prosecution may argue that the payment to Daniels was misclassified as legal expenses, thus elevating a misdemeanor to a felony. Dershowitz argues that this legal reasoning is unprecedented and fraught with complications, highlighting the challenges of proving intent behind Trump's actions. Kelly and Dershowitz also touch on the broader political landscape, including the implications of ongoing investigations into Trump and the potential for these legal battles to influence the upcoming elections. Dershowitz expresses concern over the precedent set by targeting political figures, regardless of party affiliation, and stresses the importance of protecting civil liberties. The discussion transitions to the recent firing of Dr. Tabia Lee, a diversity, equity, and inclusion director at a California college, who claims she was dismissed for questioning anti-racism policies. Lee recounts her experiences of being labeled a "white supremacist" for her views and highlights the ideological extremism she faced within the institution. She emphasizes the need for open dialogue and the importance of diverse perspectives in educational settings. Finally, the conversation shifts to international affairs, particularly China's growing influence under Xi Jinping. Michael Cunningham joins to discuss China's strategic ambitions, its relationships with rogue states, and the implications of its actions on global stability. Cunningham warns that China's rise poses a significant challenge to U.S. interests, particularly in the context of Taiwan and its expanding role in the Middle East. He emphasizes the need for the U.S. to maintain its leadership and address the threats posed by China's assertive foreign policy.

In a recent discussion, Niall Ferguson critiques the current state of academia, particularly regarding the rise of "wokeism" and its implications for free speech and intellectual integrity. He argues that many intellectuals betray their academic roles by pursuing political agendas, drawing parallels to the historical alignment of German universities with the Nazi party. Ferguson highlights the alarming trend of anti-Semitism in elite institutions, particularly following the events of October 7, when numerous student groups at Harvard condoned Hamas's actions, revealing a troubling ideological shift. He emphasizes that the ideology of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) has become a career opportunity for some while marginalizing conservative voices. Ferguson calls for a fundamental change in university governance to protect free speech and academic freedom, advocating for the establishment of new institutions like the University of Austin as a solution to the pervasive issues in American academia. He expresses cautious optimism that recent events may prompt necessary reforms across universities.

A new movie, *October 8th*, explores the rise of anti-Semitism in America, featuring notable figures like Cheryl Sandberg, who shared a viral clip expressing fear for her safety. Critics argue the film conflates anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism amid ongoing violence against Palestinians. Sam Adler Bell highlighted how U.S. policies are using Jewish safety rhetoric to suppress dissent, with students being targeted for political speech. Reports indicate ICE is deporting students based on ideological tests, raising concerns about free speech and civil rights. The narrative surrounding Jewish safety is seen as enabling authoritarianism, endangering both citizens and immigrants.

Bari Weiss, a former journalist at the New York Times, discusses her resignation and the broader societal changes she perceives as a "great unraveling." She argues that the post-World War II consensus about America’s role and goodness has collapsed, with elite institutions now promoting a narrow worldview. The internet has transformed information dissemination, exposing disconnects between elite narratives and public experiences, especially highlighted during COVID-19. Weiss critiques the ideological rigidity in universities and media, where dissenting views face severe backlash. She emphasizes the need for new institutions, like her Substack, Common Sense, and the University of Austin, to foster genuine discourse and education. Weiss connects the rise of wokeness to a resurgence of anti-Semitism, noting that Jews are uniquely positioned outside the binary of oppressor and oppressed. She expresses optimism for a counter-revolution that revisits foundational democratic principles, aiming to create spaces that encourage independent thought and diverse perspectives.

Dave Rubin discusses the current state of "woke" culture, highlighting how figures like Jimmy Kimmel and Claudine Gay, president of Harvard, exemplify the problematic nature of elite institutions. He critiques Kimmel's past blackface incidents, suggesting that his alignment with wokeism protects him from backlash. Rubin emphasizes that the woke movement is doubling down on its ideologies, leading to the decline of institutions like Harvard, which he refers to as "Hamas University." He cites allegations of plagiarism against Gay, arguing that such misconduct reflects broader issues of systemic racism and academic integrity. Rubin also addresses the absurdity of identity politics, including a recent tuition strike at Columbia University over Israeli policies. He warns against complacency, urging people to speak out against the encroachment of radical ideas in society, as silence only exacerbates the problem.