TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The former FBI director found a hidden room in the Hoover Building containing documents and computer hard drives that James Comey and others concealed. The room was locked, and access was restricted to prevent discovery. The speaker's team is currently investigating the contents of the room. The speaker says people want them to make arrests, but the speaker wants to run a methodical investigation.

Flynn understood the intel world's workings and funding, making him a target. He was considered one of the most respected generals. As Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency in 2012, Flynn ordered an audit of the DIA's use of contractors, which reportedly set off alarm bells. Flynn refused to alter his assessment despite pressure from political appointees. Clapper, Comey, and Brennan allegedly lied under oath, while Flynn told the truth, making him a threat to the establishment. Obama warned Trump to avoid Flynn, considering him "bad news." Flynn's experience revealed that his worst enemies were within America. The media scrutiny and legal battles led to deep depression within his family. Despite pleading guilty to lying to the FBI, his family maintained his innocence and fought back against the accusations.

Speaker 0: Did you see evidence of collusion, coordination, conspiracy between Donald Trump and Russian state actors? Speaker 1: I saw information intelligence that was worthy of investigation by the bureau to determine whether or not such cooperation of conclusion was taking place. Speaker 0: That doesn't help us a lot. What was the nature of the information? Speaker 1: As I said, mister Gowdy, I think this committee now has access to the type of information that I'm alluding to here. It's classified and I'm happy to talk about it in classified session. Speaker 0: And that would have been directly between the candidate and Russian state actors? Speaker 1: That's not what I said. I'm not going to talk about any individual's But Speaker 0: that was my question.

I sent a couple of FBI agents to the White House to interview Flynn. In a more organized administration, like Bush or Obama, you'd have to work through the White House counsel to get approvals. But I thought, let's just send them over. We called Flynn and said we were sending a couple of agents over and hoped he'd talk to them. He said sure. They interviewed him in a conference room at the White House situation room, and he lied to them, which he plead guilty to. I don't think he knew why they were coming over. We didn't tell him, just said we were sending a couple of agents to ask some questions and hoped he had a few minutes to talk. He said sure.

In this video, the speaker reflects on the current state of the White House and how it is difficult to imagine two FBI agents being in the situation room. The speaker admits to sending the agents, which may not have been possible in a more organized investigation or administration. Typically, the FBI would coordinate with the White House counsel for interviews with senior officials, involving discussions and approvals. However, the speaker decided to send a couple of agents without going through the usual process, considering it was early in the investigation.

An individual sent two FBI agents to the White House to interview a senior official, Michael Flynn. This action bypassed typical protocols involving the White House counsel, which would have been followed in administrations like those of George W. Bush or Barack Obama. The speaker believed it was early enough in the administration to circumvent the usual process. A call was placed to Flynn, informing him that a couple of agents were being sent over to ask him some questions, to which Flynn agreed. The agents interviewed Flynn in a conference room at the White House Situation Room, and Flynn allegedly lied to them during the interview. He later pled guilty to this. Flynn was not informed about the specific purpose of the agents' visit beforehand.

He laundered Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign talking points through the American intelligence services. That's a violation of the people's trust. That's a violation of what our intelligence services should be doing, and I absolutely think they broke the law. You're gonna see a lot of people get indicted for that. Here's the thing that should really bother the American people. What do you want our intelligence community to be doing? I want them to be catching bad guys. I want them to be making sure that terrorists aren't gonna kill innocent American civilians. I don't want them laundering Hillary Clinton's campaign talking points into the American media and giving them this air of legitimacy. It is sick and it's disgusting. It hurt the intelligence community. It hurt the American people, and it hurt the first Trump administration. We've gotta have consequences for it.

Google informed the speaker of surveillance five years after the investigation began, but could not provide details. As a former national security prosecutor, the speaker believes all providers, telecoms, and banks were likely involved. Two individuals running the FBI and DOJ allegedly lied to the House Intelligence Committee and threatened them with investigation. One of those individuals, Rob Rosenstein, was exposed for signing a bogus Pfizer application. The speaker claims Chris Wray has repeatedly lied as FBI director. Gina Haspel, CIA director, was London station chief when Russia gate began, which the speaker describes as a barroom operation to record someone divulging information on Donald Trump.

"You wanna talk about an insurrection? This is a insurrection against the American people that was thwarted at multiple times." "He looked me in the eye and said, the truth of the matter is we took the playbook for psychological operations and information warfare that we would use against our enemies, and we turned it against the American people to undo the twenty sixteen election and to make sure they didn't elect Donald Trump in 2020." "Now that is a senior intelligence officer with more than thirty years of experience, a patriot who served in some of the most dangerous parts of the world, and he understood that the tactics of making something fake look real were ripped right up our out of our intelligence communities." "Our intelligence agencies not only harm Donald Trump, they were harming the American public, the national security interest of the American public."

In a more structured administration, like those of George W. Bush or Barack Obama, sending FBI agents to the White House required navigating a formal process involving the White House counsel, discussions, and approvals. However, early on, I decided to send a couple of agents over to interview Flynn directly. We called Flynn, informed him that we were sending a couple of agents over and hoped he would speak with them. He agreed. The agents interviewed him in a White House conference room, and he lied to them, which led to his guilty plea. I don't think he knew the purpose of the interview. We simply told him that we were sending a couple of agents to ask him some questions and hoped he had a few minutes to speak with them. He agreed.

Speaker 0: Some Republicans argue that Nancy Pelosi staged January 6 and the select committee covered it up. Based on what you know, what are the verifiable events in the lead ups? Speaker 1: I was DoD chief of staff on January 6. We deployed National Guard; in the Oval Office the president, president Trump at the time, authorized pursuant to law up to 10 to 20,000 National Guard. We took that authorization because the law's second part required a request from who? Nancy Pelosi and the Metropolitan Police and the mayor at the time. And what did they say? No. And remember what happened for the next two years? They say, Oh, Kash is lying. Trump’s lying. And what do we find? Letters of their declination of the National Guard refusing to have the National Guard show up. Nancy Pelosi and her team were busy filming a movie on January 6 while this so caused chaos around her was going down. If she had just look at it this way. If she had said yes to the National Guard and we had 10,000 uniformed military officers establish a secure perimeter, do you think January 6 would have gone differently? Speaker 0: It is intriguing that 02/1950 FBI plain clothed agents were inside the Capitol on January 6. Speaker 1: This is a great example of the president's initiative to solve all the answers on January 6, and it's another example of our transparency efforts. Pursuant to the president, we investigated the matter and found out why FBI agents were placed there in the first place. And it turns out, we found documentation and witnesses and whistleblowers that said we were forced to go there to do riot control. Armstrong, do you know what the FBI does not do ever? Riot control. Speaker 0: And you believe them? That's their word, not mine.

Michael Flynn pleaded guilty for lying to the FBI. He understood the intel world and its funding, making him a threat. A political appointee felt pressured to change their assessment but refused. President Obama warned Trump to stay away from Flynn.

I bribed Hillary Clinton $18,000,000 on behalf of the FBI in 2016. The FBI wanted to set her up in a sting operation. They told me to facilitate a bribe from another government. I did this on January 14, 2016. The FBI later told me to forget about it because Hillary was going to win the election. They said Obama's people were controlling things. This was part of a plan called Operation Snow Globe to control Hillary for 8 years. I realized I was being used to manipulate her. The whole situation was a coup against Hillary that turned into the Russian collusion delusion when Trump won. I knew in 2018 they were planning to hijack the 2020 election.

I sent a couple of FBI agents to the White House to interview Flynn. In a more organized administration, like Bush or Obama, you'd have to work through the White House counsel to get approvals. But I thought it was early enough in the administration to just send them over. We called Flynn and said we were sending a couple of guys over and hoped he'd talk to them. He said, sure. Nobody else was there. They interviewed him in a conference room in the White House situation room, and he lied to them. That's what he pled guilty to. I don't think he knew why they were coming over. We just told him we were sending a couple of agents over to ask some questions and hoped he had a few minutes to sit down and talk to them. And he said, sure.

These remarks were notable as Crooks reached the final phase of his YouTube commenting, during which a new figure, Willie Tepes, pressured Crooks to embrace violence. Tepes wrote, “if a gun and a badge is all that is needed, then authority obviously comes from the barrel of a gun. We have more guns than they do. There is no way we can avoid a war at this point, so you better just get used to the idea. We have nothing to lose and everything to win. And the alternative, a global police state, is unacceptable.” The identity of Willie Tepes remains unknown; the FBI has not publicly mentioned him, though they are aware he exists. Days after the shooting, someone screenshotted Tepes’ YouTube account page despite him having few followers. The user’s online footprint now appears on a foreign Antifa website linking Tepes to the Nordic Resistance Movement, a group designated a terrorist organization by the US State Department. Crooks’ online footprint abruptly ends after his encounter with Tepes. Regardless of Tepes’ motives or affiliations, Crooks was clearly ripe for recruitment; from early 2019 to mid-2020, his political views evolved and he searched for Trump more than 700 times online, as well as for Jack Ruby, the man who assassinated Lee Harvey Oswald. He submitted queries including “craziest chemical reactions,” “cars running over protesters,” “best places for mass shooting,” “mass shooting El Paso,” “Trump’s civil war,” “Orlando shooting reaction,” “firing an AR-15 as fast as possible,” “fertilizer bomb,” “how to make napalm,” “how to make Molotov cocktail,” “mass shooting Canada,” “Oklahoma bombing,” and “sniper in Dallas shooting.” He also searched for “American Nazi Party,” “German national anthem 1933, 1945,” “Hitler’s speeches with subtitles,” “neo Nazis,” and “why gays need to go.” Thus, a volatile, troubled, possibly mentally ill young man with a long record of espousing violence in public. The FBI clearly knew he existed. At the same time Crooks was making these posts publicly, the FBI was issuing contracts to private sector tech surveillance firms to harness mass data collection tools to monitor social media for people just like Crooks. It is hard to imagine Crooks, posting in his own name, had not been identified and looked at closely by federal law enforcement. The FBI had access to these YouTube comments, and instead of providing valuable insights, they selectively read them to mischaracterize Crooks’ thoughts. Two and a half weeks after the July 30 attack, a source familiar with the investigation told CNN that federal investigators were looking into a YouTube account possibly connected to Crooks that espoused political violence as well as antisemitic and anti-immigration themes. It wasn’t “possibly connected to Thomas Crooks” as the FBI knew it was Crooks’ account; the same day, the FBI’s deputy director made the same dishonest claim before Congress, and the previous week FBI Director Christopher Wray publicly questioned whether Trump was even shot. In February 2025, the New York Post reported that the FBI obstructed efforts to solve why Thomas Matthew Crooks, who left no manifesto, did what he did. The Post said this left local law enforcement, Crooks’ former friends, classmates, and teachers frustrated, and noted that the cremation timing raised concerns. Less than a month after the shooting, Congressman Clay Higgins of Louisiana, a former police officer, investigated in Butler and learned that the FBI released Crooks’ body for cremation ten days after July 13. Higgins reported that the coroner said Crooks’ body would not have been released to the family for cremation or burial without FBI permission. The cremation, the day House Homeland Security and Oversight Committees began investigations, made it impossible for investigators outside the FBI to verify the autopsy report; a new tox screen could not be performed because the body no longer exists.

President Obama tasked us with the intelligence community assessment, which led to the ongoing Special Counsel Mueller investigation. However, neither President Obama nor I knew about the FBI investigation on Trump. I personally found out about it as a private citizen through the Washington Post. It's important to note that the White House traditionally does not involve itself in such matters. The Republicans in Congress are focusing on the dossier, but they had no involvement in it.

Speaker 0: "What I'm saying is a reasonable suspicion is that there were agents. There's a video showing a guy with an earpiece pulling people into the building. Alright? Mhmm. You combine that with the evidence of Ray Epps, and it looks like you have a preponderance of evidence suggesting there may have been federal law enforcement involved in making that thing happen." Speaker 1: "I'll get you beyond a reasonable doubt. Two pieces of information. Ray Epps was on FBI's most wanted list one day, and the next day, he was off of the FBI's most wanted list. There are only two ways that happens. You die or your informant." Speaker 1: "Put that aside. Under congressional testimony, Jill Sanborn, who I used to work with, the head of the FBI counterintelligence division in charge of all these investigations, testified under oath when senator Cruz asked her, flat out, were there federal agents involved with January 6? And she said, quote, senator, I can't answer that at this time." Speaker 1: "The reason she said I can't answer that is because of the same stonewalling they gave us during Russergate with Christopher Steelehauper and everybody else. It's the same narrative, and and I'm telling you they were there." Speaker 0: "You're so you're saying that she said I can't answer that because the answer is yes Yeah. And that would compromise whatever their operation was. Exactly."

We covered the Russia hoax constantly because the FBI was actively investigating it. We reported what unnamed FBI agents were saying. Any viewer would have believed that Trump and Putin conspired in 2016, but that was completely false. Trump went to extraordinary lengths to keep his meetings with Putin secret, even from his own administration. When asked if he ever worked for Russia, Trump responded that it was the most insulting question he’d ever been asked and the most insulting article ever written about him. He did not directly answer the question, which is a stunning turn of events. Did the President of the United States ever work on behalf of the Russians against American interests?

I'm a journalist investigating the administrative state. I confronted a former FBI special agent, now an advisor to the joint chiefs at the Pentagon, about his political activities and fundraising efforts with retired generals. He became angry, called me names, and accused me of fraud and being a liar. He even claimed I needed his permission to record him, despite being in a one-party consent state. He denied saying things that I have on tape, including discussing plans after Trump wins. I questioned the ethics of his political involvement as a Pentagon advisor, and I asked him whether he thought it was appropriate to share sensitive information with strangers, even joking about whether I was a Russian spy.

The FBI was accused of treason and illegal spying, but the truth is that all of that was nonsense. I was wrong about the FISA process being handled in a thoughtful and appropriate way; I was overconfident. The Steele reporting played a central and essential role in the decision to seek a FISA order, but the FBI didn't conclude that Steele's reporting was bunk after talking to a sub source. As director, I wasn't informed on the details of the investigation. The inspector general did not find misconduct by any FBI people, but mistakes, negligence, and oversight. One FBI lawyer doctored a document. The inspector general did not find political bias or illegal conduct, but significant mistakes. The American people were given false information about the FBI. It is honest, and flawed. It's unclear if there was gross incompetence, negligence, or intentionality.

Speaker 0 asks General Flynn for his advice to President Trump and the American people. General Flynn mentions a conversation with Trump where they discuss being falsely indicted. He emphasizes that Trump is a clean person, just like himself, and that they both have been thoroughly investigated with no evidence found. General Flynn believes this is a powerful statement because he knew what the investigators knew.

The FBI was accused of treason, illegal spying, and a criminal conspiracy to unseat a president. All of that was nonsense. I was overconfident in the procedures that the FBI and Justice had built. The Steele reporting played a central and essential role in the decision to seek a FISA order. I don't believe the FBI concluded that Steele's reporting was bunk after talking to a sub source. As the director, you're not kept informed on the details of an investigation. The inspector general did not find misconduct by any FBI people. He found mistakes and negligent oversight. The inspector general found significant mistakes, and that is not something to sneeze at. The American people, especially your viewers, need to realize they were given false information about the FBI. It's honest, it is not political, it is flawed.

The speaker can't explain why Attorney General Barr used the word "spying" to describe the FBI's actions, suggesting Barr may have used it because the president does, which is disappointing. The speaker defends sending an investigator undercover to meet with Papadopoulos, who was connected to the Trump campaign, as a reasonable step based on information from the Australians about Papadopoulos's contact with the Russians. The speaker doesn't recall specifically approving the undercover operation but knew the team was trying to verify the information. As director, the speaker was regularly briefed on the investigation but didn't run it. The speaker wanted to keep it closely held and authorized the team to use their authorities to investigate. The speaker neither confirms nor denies knowing about the undercover operation targeting Papadopoulos, deferring to the FBI for confirmation and questioning the source of the news article reporting it.

An individual sent two FBI agents to the White House to interview a senior official, Michael Flynn. This action bypassed typical protocols involving the White House counsel, which would have been followed in administrations like those of George W. Bush or Barack Obama. The speaker believed it was early enough in the administration to circumvent the usual process. A call was placed to Flynn, informing him that a couple of agents were being sent over to ask him some questions, to which Flynn agreed. The agents interviewed Flynn in a conference room at the White House Situation Room, and Flynn allegedly lied to them during the interview. Flynn pleaded guilty to this. Flynn was not informed about the specific purpose of the agents' visit beforehand.

I sent a couple of FBI agents to the White House to interview Flynn. This is something I probably wouldn't have done in a more organized administration, like under George W. Bush or Obama, where there was more process. Usually, the FBI would work through the White House counsel to get approvals. But I thought, let's just send them over. We called Flynn and said we were sending a couple of guys over and hoped he'd talk to them. He agreed, and they interviewed him in the White House situation room with no one else present. He lied to them during the interview, which is what he pled guilty to. We didn't tell him why they were coming, just that they wanted to ask some questions.