reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses an operation that aimed to incite conflict between the Hutu and Tutsi groups. However, things escalated quickly, leading to uncontrollable rage and violence. The speaker reveals that researchers discovered specific brainwaves that control our actions and emotions, such as rage, fear, and lethargy. In the past, transmitting these brainwaves accurately was challenging, but with advancements in technology, it became feasible.

The speaker discusses unethical government experiments, such as Project MKUltra and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. They highlight how these projects violated human rights and caused lasting harm. The speaker questions the government's trustworthiness and calls for more accountability. They emphasize the need for awareness and action to prevent such injustices from happening again.

In a study conducted by the speaker and their graduate students, college students volunteered to participate in a study on prison life. After personality tests and interviews, 24 participants were randomly assigned to be either prisoners or guards. The experiment began with a realistic arrest, where a police car arrived at the participants' homes and took them away in front of real neighbors. The prisoners were then taken to a makeshift cell in the basement of a police station. The speaker, who was the first prisoner picked up, described the experience as degrading.

- Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the possibility that a friend was murdered and suggest that both victims died suddenly from fast-moving cancer, a method they say the agency uses overseas to eliminate people. Speaker 1 admits he cannot prove this but notes the sudden deaths. - The conversation asserts that the US government has technology to infect people with fast-moving cancer and to perform cognitive and directed-energy warfare. Speaker 0 states the government has the technology to infect with fast-moving cancer and to do so absolutely. - In 1997, Speaker 1 describes a hearing on asymmetric threats where he chaired the research committee and focused on four threats: drones, cyberattacks, electromagnetic pulse (EMP), and cognitive warfare. He asserts that cognitive warfare is now being labeled by some as Havana syndrome and that directed-energy weapons are the underlying technology. - Speaker 2 recounts a recent homeland security hearing about foreign adversaries using direct weapons against US citizens, enabling incapacitation. He emphasizes the chilling nature of the briefing and criticizes current domestic leadership as foolish, corrupt, incompetent, and wicked. - Speaker 3 notes that up to 40% of the Air Force equipment budget in the 1990s was classified, making much of it “black.” He emphasizes that military and security research often precedes civilian medical science, and that servicemen were used in experiments without fully informed consent, referencing NK Ultra-era disclosures of thousands of service members used as subjects. - Speaker 4 discusses MKUltra, describing a Canadian experiment involving psychic driving with massive LSD doses, eye-tracking, and memory loss, funded by MKUltra and affecting civilians. He mentions Project Midnight Climax, where Johns were observed in brothels while subjected to LSD, and notes similar experiments by the British Royal Air Force and Army. The results of Midnight Climax are unknown, with no published after-action reports. - Speaker 3 adds that Secretary of Energy O’Leary stated under Clinton that over a half a million Americans had been used in human experiments over four decades without informed consent, including mind control, with no accountability. He argues that mind-control technology has advanced, and questions who should govern its use, given the lack of legal frameworks. - The discussion covers mind-effects research and the lack of treaties governing such technologies. They reference a European Parliament security and disarmament resolution (1999) addressing mind-effects and mind-control technology, and Russian Duma resolutions (2002) seeking similar safeguards. Zabigniew Brzezinski’s Between Two Ages is cited regarding electronically stroking the ionosphere to influence behavior over geographic areas, connecting it to HARP and other electromagnetic carriers capable of mass or individual influence. - Speaker 6 explains historical demonstrations of electronic mind control, starting with Jose Delgado’s remote manipulation of a charging bull using radio energy and electrodes, and notes later work showing noninvasive techniques to influence behavior using low-power magnetic fields. Speaker 7 reiterates Delgado’s animal studies and the potential for noninvasive methods to affect emotions and memory, with broader implications for humans. - Speaker 3 discusses the progression of research funded by DARPA and others toward higher-resolution control of brain activity, enabling controlled effects that override senses and create synthetic memories, raising questions about future justice and evidence. They describe European Parliament and NATO/US military interest in mind-control technologies and the absence of robust legal protections. - Speaker 9 presents advances in AI-enabled brain-reading and memory-altering devices, including mind-reading and emotion decoding, while Speaker 10 and Speaker 12 discuss privacy concerns, brain-data privacy laws (Colorado’s law adding brain data to privacy protections), and the availability of consumer devices that decode brainwaves. They warn that brain data can be misused by insurers, law enforcement, advertisers, and governments, with private companies often sharing data without clear disclosure. - The segment concludes with a note that devices can infer attention and thoughts, and that DARPA’s N3D program aims for noninvasive neuromodulation with implantable electrodes read/write capabilities. It references 1980s–1990s discussions of RF energy as a potential nonlethal mind-control technology, and a 1993 Johns Hopkins conference listing low-frequency weapons as attractive options.

The speaker discusses an operation that aimed to incite conflict between the Hutu and Tutsi groups. However, things escalated quickly, leading to uncontrollable rage and violence. The speaker reveals that researchers discovered specific brainwaves that control our actions and emotions, such as rage, fear, and lethargy. In the past, transmitting these brainwaves accurately was challenging, but with advancements in technology, like transistors and microprocessors, it became feasible to apply precise control brainwaves practically.

The speaker presents findings from a study conducted on one of the country’s largest mink ranches, focusing on how different housing conditions and a hormonal treatment influence breeding success and behavior. The procedure involves injecting female mink with a pregnant mare serum if they fail to become pregnant after mating. The results are described for two distinct environments: behind blue plastic and behind pink plastic. Behind the blue plastic, the outcomes were highly favorable. After the first mating, all of the females became pregnant. In this setting, all of the males were classified in the trade as working males. In addition to reproductive success, both males and females became very friendly and docile after ninety days behind the blue plastic, indicating a notable shift in behavior associated with this housing condition and time period. In contrast, behind the pink plastic the results differed markedly. After three attempts at mating and injecting the pregnant mare serum, only eighty-six percent of the females became pregnant. Furthermore, ninety percent of the males were classified as non-working males. The animals kept behind the pink plastic also exhibited increased aggression and became noticeably more difficult to manage. Overall, the comparison suggests that the blue plastic environment, combined with an initial mating and the use of pregnant mare serum, led to universal pregnancy among females after a single mating and a predominance of working males, along with a rise in friendliness and docility after ninety days. The pink plastic environment resulted in lower pregnancy rates after multiple mating attempts and serum injections, a high proportion of non-working males, and greater aggression and management challenges.

The speaker describes an experiment involving water and words. By freezing water with words attached to it, crystalline formations are created. The speaker emphasizes the impact of words on matter and suggests conducting a similar experiment at home. In the experiment, two jars of boiled white rice are labeled "love" and "hate." Positive words are spoken to the love jar, while negative words are spoken to the hate jar. Over time, the love jar remains white while the hate jar becomes dark and moldy. This experiment serves as a powerful lesson for teaching children about the impact of words.

Speaker 0 describes an experiment in which young white rats were placed directly in front of a TV set for the same time periods as bean plants and children exhibiting tired child syndrome symptoms. Using semi time lapse photography, partially speeding up the action, the results show that the young rats on the left, protected only with black photographic paper, became aggressive and more difficult to manage. In contrast, those on the right, protected with a lead shield, remained perfectly normal and docile. Autopsies were performed on all of these animals, revealing brain tissue damage in the rats protected only with the black paper, but not in those protected with the lead shielding.

The speaker discusses the testing of vaccines on animals and jokes about the potential advantages in the Olympics. They mention the emergence of AIDS and leukemia due to wild viruses, and how this was considered good science at the time. They also raise concerns about the potential negative outcomes of profit-driven and population control-focused science conducted by the military, medical, and petrochemical industries.

During twelve years of work, the speaker encountered no female patient who hadn't been sexually abused as a child. The speaker poses the question of who would choose to be sexually abused or traumatized in childhood, or aspire to become a drug addict and break the law. The speaker asserts that addiction is a response to pain, and that traumatic experiences shape the brain's physiology, biasing it towards addictive behaviors, including substance use.

In the 1960s, a psychologist conducted an experiment with monkeys to show how society influences behavior. Monkeys were punished with water if they tried to get bananas. New monkeys were introduced, and even though they had never been splashed, they learned not to climb for bananas due to peer pressure. This illustrates how society can influence individuals without them understanding why. The experiment suggests that people may act based on societal norms rather than critical thinking.

A healthy rat can navigate through water to safety, while another rat, fed a diet similar to a typical North American one, struggles to find its way. The latter rat's brain has been damaged, leading to memory loss and decreased cognitive abilities, similar to Alzheimer's disease in humans. Researchers believe that Alzheimer's may actually be a form of brain diabetes, linked to insulin levels affected by excessive sugar consumption. Insulin resistance can occur in various organs, including the brain, leading to cognitive decline.

The speaker discusses a line of research comparing fat mice and skinny mice and how their own experiments align with those findings. They mention studies of the fat-versus-skinny mouse dynamic and describe an experiment they conducted in which skinny mice were given soy. As a result, the skinny mice began to gain weight, and a change in their microbiome was observed, shifting from a composition associated with skinny mice to one more characteristic of fat mice. The speaker then references broader studies that have examined the effect of transferring gut microbiota between mice. Specifically, they note that there have been studies showing that transplanting stool from a skinny mouse to a fat mouse leads the fat mouse to become skinny, and conversely, transferring stool from a fat mouse to a skinny mouse can cause the skinny mouse to become fat. This describes a bidirectional transfer of weight-related phenotypes through microbiome transplantation. A caveat is added regarding adult mice: while these stool-transplant studies have shown such effects, they have not yet been reproduced in adults. In other words, the phenomenon has not been consistently demonstrated in adult mice within the cited research, implying potential limitations or conditions required for replication in adult subjects. Overall, the speaker links dietary input (soy) to weight change and microbiome alterations in mice, and connects this to microbiome transplantation studies that suggest a causal role for gut microbes in determining weight phenotypes, while acknowledging that the adult replication of these effects remains unestablished.

A study found that corporate executives showed more extreme psychopathic tendencies than patients diagnosed with psychopathic personality disorders. The speaker suggests that society rewards psychopathic behavior, with the rich going to business school and the poor ending up in prison. The myth is that success is achieved through hard work and enterprise, but in reality, wealth often comes from parasitic economic relations. The speaker emphasizes the importance of recognizing this truth and challenging the propagated story. Opposing voices are attacked, but the speaker encourages telling oneself different stories and not trusting those in power.

The speaker asserts that all computer screens are blue-lit because the original technology emerged from a government program associated with Operation Paperclip. He says this program originated at Tulane Neurology and Tulane Neurosurgery in the mid-20th century, where the CIA conducted experiments on monkeys involving drilling into the skull, placing wires into the thalamus, and applying electricity to observe behavioral changes. One participant, Professor Delgado, reportedly proposed wireless control after seeing that wired devices could alter behavior. Delgado allegedly demonstrated wireless control in monkeys and bulls using RFID chips and semiconductors. The speaker claims the CIA then expanded the concept to light and screens, suggesting that electromagnetic radiation through screens can influence behavior, and asserts that this is why computer screens operate at certain frequencies. He connects this idea to a meeting arranged by a patent attorney who allegedly safeguarded the interests of Google and Meta to enable control over people’s activities. In a broader backstory, the speaker asserts that the original idea behind this development began with the CIA and traces it back to the Mafia in Las Vegas. He contends the Mafia wanted to build a new city in a desert, enclosed it, blacked out windows, and invented blue-lit slot machines. They supposedly discovered that money could be extracted more efficiently by offering free alcohol, which then inspired the CIA to initiate the program. The speaker emphasizes that this chain of events links Operation Paperclip, the CIA’s research, and modern tech platforms. He references Bobby Kennedy in connection with the topic, and notes his medical school background at LSU.

You may have heard of the flea in the jar metaphor. If you put a flea in a jar and put the lid on, the flea will go crazy, jumping around and hitting its head on the lid. It does this for a period of time, but then it learns the boundaries of the jar. After a certain period of time, you can take the lid off the jar and the flea will never jump out again because it’s learned to be conditioned by its environment. What I’m suggesting is that human beings are exactly the same. Our thinking has conditioned us to operate and live a certain way based on all of the thinking we’ve had during our life. We talk about paradigms. A paradigm is the reality you’ve created through your thinking over time. You exist within the paradigms you’ve got about everything, which is like being in the jar. You’ll have paradigms about yourself, about your partner, about your work, about your life, about your house. You’ll have paradigms about your boss. You’ll have paradigms about the market, the economy, Brexit, all sorts of things. And those paradigms are shaping you in all sorts of ways and restricting your behaviour. Now don’t get me wrong, there’ll be certain paradigms that you’ve got that will have helped you be incredibly successful and get to where you’ve got to in your life and in your career. But there are all sorts of paradigms going on that are also limiting you and keeping you within the jar. I had a situation recently with a client called Steve. He had paradigms about his boss—thinking that his boss was untrustworthy, that he didn’t care for people, and so on. And what was very apparent was that when Steve existed within that thinking, when he showed up in a meeting with his boss, he would show up in a certain way. He wouldn’t be fully expressed and relaxed. He would be guarded, defensive, not really being his true self. And of course that paradigm is pretty dangerous to operate within when you’re working with your boss, because you’ll never end up with really great connection. I had another situation recently with a lady called Andrea. She had paradigms about her life and her work. A very common paradigm is she wanted to be great at home as a great mother and have great life balance and also be great in her work. But she had a paradigm that she existed in which that wasn’t possible. She couldn’t do both roles really, really well. Now think what it’s like to live within that paradigm. You’re never going to win. The point of this video is simply to have you reflect a little bit on your own paradigms. What are the paradigms that you’re conscious of? And what are the paradigms that are driving you and influencing you that you’re not even conscious of yet? And what would it be like to blow those paradigms away and break out from the jar?

The speaker discusses an operation that aimed to incite conflict between the Hutu and Tutsi groups. However, things escalated quickly, leading to uncontrollable rage among the Hutu crowd. It is revealed that researchers discovered specific brainwaves that control our actions and emotions, such as rage, fear, and lethargy, back in the 1950s. The challenge at that time was transmitting these brainwaves accurately. With advancements in technology like transistors and microprocessors, the practical application of precise control brainwaves became possible.

This transcript recounts a premise called “the mouse paradise,” a scientific experiment from the nineteen sixties. It describes placing four females and four males and letting them multiply. The population exploded—“Hundreds and thousands.” Then “something strange happened. They stopped mating. And within four years, they were extinct.” The stated reason was “social interaction overload.” The mice faced “twenty four seven interaction with thousands of others,” leading to “too much stimulation, too much competition for social status.” As a result, many males became so called “the beautiful ones,” losing interest in females and groomed themselves all day, withdrawing completely. The females, in turn, followed by losing interest in males. The outcome: “no mating and they all just died without having babies.” The narration draws a parallel to humans, asserting that “since twenty ten smartphones, humans are living the same social interaction overload.” It describes “twenty four seven status competition, income and lifestyle comparison with thousands of others,” and “physical looks to impossible standards.” It contends that many young people “just choose to withdraw.” It claims, “For the first time in history, young people are having less sex than their parents.” The data point given is that “Thirty percent of men 30 had no sex for a year.” The speaker labels this trend as a “loneliness epidemic” that “hits us harder than any virus could.” The closing lines emphasize a contrast between the mice and humans: “The mice couldn't turn this off.” Yet the speaker asserts personal agency for the listener: “But you, you can.”

The speaker discusses the negative impact of technology on society, including increased life expectancy but also destabilization, unfulfillment, indignities, psychological suffering, physical suffering in the third world, and damage to the natural world. They believe that further technological development will worsen these issues. The conversation then shifts to Theodore Kaczynski, also known as the Unabomber, who was subjected to mind control experiments as a young prodigy at Harvard. The experiments were part of the CIA's MK Ultra program, which aimed to study mind control using drugs. The speaker expresses concern over the destruction of young minds for intelligence research and wonders what Kaczynski could have achieved if his potential had been channeled into something beneficial for society.

The speaker discusses an operation that aimed to incite conflict between the Hutu and Tutsi groups. However, things escalated quickly, leading to uncontrollable rage and violence. The speaker reveals that researchers discovered specific brainwaves that control our actions and emotions, such as rage, fear, and lethargy. In the past, transmitting these brainwaves accurately was challenging, but with advancements in technology, it became feasible.