TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Prior to the election, the FBI was aware of the Burisma scandals and the Hunter Biden laptop, which implicated them in a bribery scheme. Instead of properly investigating, the FBI attempted to hide the information, punish the senators involved, and censor American citizens by pressuring Twitter and other platforms to block reporting on the laptop.

The most alarming thing was the organized communication between the FBI, Department of Homeland Security, and tech companies, involving flagging content in large numbers. Four federal judges have ruled that this violates the First Amendment. Former FBI officials within Twitter and other groups worked to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story, despite it not violating Twitter's terms of service. The FBI and CIA had their own internal groups within Twitter. The Aspen Institute held a workshop to discourage coverage of the Hunter Biden laptop story. Content moderators at social media platforms have too much power in determining what Americans can say and see. This collusion between unelected bureaucrats and tech companies is inappropriate and a form of election interference. The censorship organizations tend to have a biased leaning.

FBI Special Agent Elvis Chan informed Twitter and other social media platforms about a potential hack and leak operation before the 2020 presidential election, despite having no evidence. The government had possession of Hunter Biden's laptop for a year and pre-bunked the story that eventually came out. The Aspen Institute held a tabletop exercise to prepare for a story about Hunter Biden and Burisma, with journalists and big tech executives present. The exercise aimed to discount and censor the story. Fifty-one former intelligence officials signed a letter claiming the laptop story was Russian disinformation, with the intention of helping Joe Biden win the election. This coordinated effort to suppress information is concerning and undermines democracy.

After Hunter Biden's guilty plea, IRS whistleblowers expressed disbelief at an internal email praising the conviction, highlighting a perceived double standard in how sensitive investigations are handled, especially for powerful individuals. They confirmed that the "big guy" referenced in emails was Joe Biden and noted that both the DOJ and FBI were aware of the legitimacy of Hunter's laptop long before the 2020 election. They alleged that political influence affected their investigation, with additional approvals required for high-profile cases. The whistleblowers have faced retaliation from the IRS and are now pursuing legal action against Hunter Biden's attorney for defamation. They emphasized the importance of restoring public confidence in fair justice, regardless of status, and acknowledged the personal toll of their whistleblowing efforts.

Three whistleblowers have accused the FBI and Department of Justice of giving preferential treatment and delaying investigations into the Bidens. FBI Director Christopher Wray's refusal to comply with a congressional oversight subpoena regarding an unclassified document supports these claims. Despite claiming the need to protect sources and methods, there are no national security concerns. Director Wray's lack of trust and previous FBI abuses make it unlikely he will win this battle. If the document is released, it may reveal a foreign national offering a $5 million bribe to Joe Biden for foreign policy considerations. Additionally, there is a need to question former FBI Director James Comey under oath regarding inconsistencies in his testimony and his knowledge of the Hillary Clinton intelligence plan. The House Oversight Committee should not back down.

Senator Grassley wrote a letter to the speaker, discussing the FBI's use of confidential human sources to provide criminal information on Joe Biden and his family. The letter questions whether the FBI tried to shut down the investigation. It alleges that an assessment by an FBI analyst was used to discredit negative information on Hunter Biden and halt the investigation. The letter suggests that there is political bias within the Justice Department and FBI, impacting decision-making at all levels. Senator Grassley urges the speaker to address this issue for the sake of our democracy.

The FBI is being criticized for not being transparent with Congress about their actions regarding a whistleblower's allegations. The whistleblower came forward because they were unsatisfied with how the FBI handled the information. The FBI is accused of covering up and not being forthcoming with Congress, who has the authority to oversee and investigate such matters. Congress should have access to the investigative materials, but the FBI is withholding them.

After Hunter Biden's guilty plea, IRS whistleblowers expressed disbelief at an internal email praising the conviction, highlighting perceived bias in IRS investigations. They alleged that "sensitive investigations" favor powerful individuals, requiring excessive approvals for cases like Biden's while allowing quicker actions against ordinary taxpayers. They confirmed that the FBI and DOJ knew Hunter's laptop was legitimate but were restricted from pursuing certain investigative steps due to the election. The whistleblowers believe there’s a double standard in how investigations are conducted based on political connections. They have faced retaliation for their disclosures, impacting their careers and personal lives, yet they maintain that their actions were justified to uphold public confidence in the justice system.

The IRS and the Justice Department are accused of interfering in the 2020 election to protect Hunter Biden. This alleged interference continues as they are now working to shield Hunter Biden and indirectly Joe Biden in preparation for the 2024 election.

The House Oversight Committee is considering holding FBI Director Christopher Wray in contempt of Congress for not complying with a subpoena related to an investigation into the Biden family's finances. The FBI did not physically hand over a document connecting then Vice President Biden to a possible bribery scheme, but allowed committee members to read it. FBI officials confirmed that the document is being used in an ongoing investigation. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy supports the contempt proceedings. There are safety concerns for the FBI informant who provided information about the Biden family, with some fearing for their life if they are publicly identified. A poll shows that 63% of Americans want the FBI to face accountability for weaponizing power against the American people. 39% want Congress to reform the FBI to prevent future political involvement.

I am Emma Jo Morris, a politics editor at Breitbart. I reported on Hunter Biden's laptop scandal in 2020, revealing emails showing Biden's involvement in family business deals. Social media platforms censored the news as hacked or Russian disinformation, with support from former intel officials. Recently, it was revealed that federal agencies influenced social media to discredit the reporting. This included FBI directing Twitter's censorship operation and granting top secret clearances to Twitter management.

After Hunter Biden's guilty plea, IRS whistleblowers expressed disbelief at an internal email praising the conviction, highlighting a perceived disparity in how the IRS treats investigations involving powerful individuals. They noted that sensitive investigations require extra approvals, creating a double standard. The whistleblowers confirmed that both the IRS and FBI knew Hunter Biden's laptop was legitimate long before the 2020 election, yet it was labeled as disinformation to influence the election outcome. They alleged that the Biden family benefited financially from Hunter's business dealings, asserting that there is substantial evidence of access and influence. Despite facing retaliation from the IRS, they remain committed to their cause, emphasizing the need for public confidence in fair justice administration.

The FBI is accused of working against the American people and needing reform. Whistleblowers spoke out about the bureau's corruption and retaliation tactics during a congressional hearing. They detailed instances of being suspended, losing financial support, and facing humiliation and intimidation. Democrats attempted to discredit the whistleblowers, but they followed proper protocols and made protected disclosures. The FBI's role in the January 6th events was also questioned, with allegations of withholding video footage and the possibility of undercover agents being present. Protecting whistleblowers and holding those who retaliate against them accountable is crucial. Financial support is being provided to the whistleblowers through a crowdfunding campaign.

The goal of the IRS whistleblower testimony is to have a substantive hearing. There are two main objectives: determining if crimes were committed by the Biden family and investigating whether the federal government obstructed the IRS investigation into their criminal activity. A former Senior FBI official confirmed that the whistleblower's claims about the investigation being obstructed were true. The whistleblower had informed the Ways and Means Committee that the Secret Service and the Biden transition team tipped off and warned Hunter Biden about the interview regarding criminal activity. As a result, the interview never took place, which raises concerns about potential obstruction of the investigation.

The speaker questions why the FBI paid Christopher Steele $1 million to verify a dossier on Trump and offered $3 million to Twitter to suppress a story on Hunter Biden. They express concern over the FBI's actions being politically motivated. The FBI director responds by explaining the payments to social media companies are for legal process costs. The speaker accuses the FBI of damaging its reputation and questions if the FBI requested financial institutions to provide customer data. The FBI director is unsure and the speaker presents an email from Bank of America as evidence.

Leading up to the 2020 election, Twitter had regular meetings with various government agencies, including the FBI, DOJ, DHS, and DNI, to engage in unconstitutional censorship. The FBI paid Twitter over $3.4 million to censor stories like the Hunter Biden laptop scandal. There was a corrupt relationship between the FBI and Twitter, with former FBI officials joining Twitter and creating their own communication channels. Polls show that if people had known about the Hunter Biden laptop story, 53% would have changed their vote, including 61% of Democrats. This is election meddling and collusion by the FBI, funded by taxpayers. The FBI's politicization extends beyond Twitter, as seen in their targeting of parents at school board meetings, which was prompted by the White House and the secretary of education. This corruption must be addressed to protect the American people from government weaponization.

An IRS supervisory special agent is willing to testify before Congress about an investigation he believes received special treatment. Attorney Mark Lytle represents the whistleblower but did not disclose his identity or the target of the investigation. However, CBS News reports that the investigation is related to Hunter Biden. The whistleblower's lawyer sent a letter to Congress claiming his client could provide information contradicting sworn testimony by a senior political appointee. Lytle stated that his client is not motivated by politics and has extensive documentation to support his allegations. The whistleblower has expressed concerns to superiors before seeking whistleblower status. The IRS, Department of Justice, and Hunter Biden's lawyer declined to comment.

They accused the FBI of warning Facebook and Twitter about Hunter's laptop, claiming it was Russian disinformation. When the New York Post revealed the laptop, it was censored by the platforms, citing the previous warning.

The FBI is being accused of corruption and targeting politicians, parents, and ordinary citizens. Whistleblowers have bravely come forward, facing retaliation and being blocked from working both inside and outside the FBI. This is a troubling time for the American people.

Director Wray, the speaker expresses concern about the politicization of the Department of Justice and the FBI during the Biden administration. They believe that senior officials have allowed these institutions to be politicized. The speaker mentions FBI agents who are unhappy with the weakening of institutional integrity due to the DOJ being treated as a political weapon. They focus on the investigation into corruption allegations involving Hunter Biden and Joe Biden. The speaker presents a WhatsApp text message from Hunter Biden to a senior Chinese communist, suggesting that Joe Biden would retaliate if a commitment was not fulfilled. They mention an IRS whistleblower who testified that the DOJ blocked attempts to obtain GPS data on Joe Biden's phone. The speaker questions whether the FBI tried to determine the locations of Hunter Biden and Joe Biden when the text was sent. Director Wray defers to the ongoing investigation led by special counsel Weiss. The speaker accuses the DOJ and underlings of trying to stop the investigation and allowing the statute of limitations to expire. They mention another testimony from the IRS whistleblower, alleging that an Assistant US attorney stated that a search warrant would not be approved due to political optics. The speaker questions whether the FBI allows political optics to hinder corruption investigations. Director Wray reiterates that they follow the facts and cannot discuss ongoing investigations. The speaker criticizes Director Wray for not doing the work and hiding behind the attorney general.

The FBI is facing allegations of internal political bias and a secret process for security clearances, according to an FBI whistleblower. The whistleblower claims that the FBI checks employees' loyalty by examining their support for the COVID-19 vaccine, Donald Trump, and the Second Amendment. Those who express conservative views or hesitancy towards the vaccine allegedly faced consequences, including suspension without pay. The FBI has not commented on the matter, but the whistleblower's representative suggests that this may be just the tip of the iceberg. The documents have raised concerns about the FBI's neutrality and the need for reform within the organization.

A supervisory special agent at the IRS is set to testify before Congress, claiming that his investigation has been hindered due to what he perceives as special treatment. He does not provide specific details about his client or the target of the investigation. However, it has been revealed that the whistleblower's investigation is related to Hunter Biden. Two years ago, Biden stated that he was fully cooperating with the DOJ's investigation into his finances, as the FBI had gathered enough evidence to potentially charge him with tax crimes.

After Hunter Biden's guilty plea, IRS whistleblowers expressed disbelief at an internal email praising the conviction, highlighting a perceived double standard in the agency's treatment of taxpayers. They noted that investigations into powerful individuals, like Biden, required excessive approvals, while ordinary cases did not. Both whistleblowers confirmed that the "big guy" mentioned in communications referred to Joe Biden, and they criticized the suppression of evidence related to Hunter's laptop, which they and the DOJ knew was legitimate. They argued that the Justice Department's actions reflected a bias against political figures and emphasized the need for public confidence in fair justice. Despite facing retaliation, they remain committed to their cause, asserting that their disclosures were justified and necessary for accountability.

The FBI's politicized hacks aimed to bring down Donald Trump, with the help of Hillary Clinton's campaign. The report revealed that Trump's political opponents provided leads for the investigation, relying on a fabricated dossier. While we reported on this, other media outlets downplayed it. Unfortunately, there were no consequences for those involved in the Crossfire Hurricane operation. In fact, they were emboldened and repeated their actions in 2022, this time protecting Hunter Biden.

FBI special agent Jonathan Buma reported intelligence suppression and discrimination after presenting information. He found the assistant director interested in allegations implicating the Bidens in business deals with Burisma, but he was shut down when reporting that Rudy Giuliani may have been compromised by individuals involved in Russian counterintelligence influence operations. Buma learned Giuliani received $300,000 from Pablo Fuchs, who had ties to transnational organized crime. Buma experienced pushback and increased scrutiny after suggesting a disinformation campaign against Biden. Despite whistleblower protection training, he faced retaliation, including a prohibition from reporting on criminal matters, public corruption, or anyone related to the White House or Trump. He was moved to a squad where he couldn't work sources. Buma filed a whistleblower complaint after seeing misconduct in management. He believes the FBI is not an arm of an anti-Trump agenda, but that the full story regarding the Bidens and Giuliani is not being told. He aims to restore the FBI's integrity and prevent other agents from experiencing similar retaliation. He intends to continue working despite potential consequences.