TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The plan involves the Attorney General and Minister for Home Affairs developing a package of legislative reforms to crack down on those who spread hate, division and radicalisation. The National Security Committee has agreed five changes: 1) Aggravated hate speech offence for preachers and leaders who promote violence. 2) Increased penalties for hate speech promoting violence. 3) Making hate an aggravating factor in sentencing crimes for online threats and harassment. 4) Developing a regime for listing organisations whose leaders engage in hate speech promoting violence or racial hatred. 5) Developing a narrow federal offence for serious vilification based on race and/or advocating racial supremacy. Additionally, the Minister for Home Affairs will have new powers to cancel or reject visas for those who spread hate and division in this country, or would do so if they were allowed to come here. The East Safety Commissioner, the Special Envoy and the Department of Communications will work together to provide online safety advice to address anti Semitism. Over the coming days, there will be more information about the government’s response to Sunday’s atrocity, including on gun control, and it is noted that New South Wales is moving on that next week.

Speaker 0 asserts that another revolution is coming, aiming to achieve a broader peace, describing Israel’s conflict as an eight-front war—Jews against Rome, with the United States as the new Rome—and stating that Rome and Jerusalem clashed over values, a tragedy the Jews lost but must win next time. Speaker 1 adds that Jews against Rome have shifted from defense to offense. Speaker 2 notes that weapons evolve and swords do not work today, implying the need for new tools; Speaker 1 emphasizes that the battle requires the genius that created Apollo, pagers, and penetrated Hezbollah to prepare for this fight. Speaker 2 argues the most important battlefields are social media, with the next war to be decided online as much as offline. Speaker 0 designates this as the eighth front: the disinformation campaign. Speaker 3 and Speaker 0 discuss the scale of online manipulation, claiming billions of dollars are invested in the information battlefield by NGOs and governments, and asserting that money drives the effort. Speaker 6 and Speaker 7 describe policies to prohibit harmful stereotypes about Jews and to deplatform those who propagate them; they claim monitoring online spaces, including social media, messaging apps, video games, and cryptocurrency, and sharing intelligence with the FBI. Speaker 7 and others reference a spectrum of platforms and formats—podcasts, short-form video, Wikipedia, LLMs—and condemn antisemitism online, including “Hitler admires, Stalin admires, Jew haters,” while insisting on countermeasures. Speaker 8 and Speaker 9 discuss TikTok as a focal point, asserting that for every thirty minutes spent on TikTok, users become 17% more antisemitic, with carnage imagery from Gaza influencing perceptions; there is a stated problem with TikTok shaping youth attitudes. Speaker 10 and Speaker 6 describe redefining terms like Zionist as a proxy for Jews and Israelis, framing such language as hate speech; Speaker 11 indicates a desire for counterintelligence and critiques current curriculum, while Speaker 1 notes co-authoring Sunday school curricula with the ADL. Speaker 11 and Speaker 6 discuss developing technology to train LLMs and to combat antisemitism, with collaboration announced with OpenAI, Alphabet, Anthropic, Meta, and Microsoft; Speaker 10 notes a network of two dozen Jewish organizations feeding intelligence. Speaker 1 outlines a program to measure, monitor, and disrupt extremist content, with a full-time team of 40 analysts; Speaker 12 mentions monitoring campuses, digital networks, activist groups, and public officials, and that PhDs and academics support the effort. Speaker 13 and Speaker 14 discuss unifying data into a single platform, investing in intelligence, and mobilizing organizations to share information and fight common enemies; Speaker 12 emphasizes constant recording and reporting, aiming to mobilize allies. Speaker 15 and Speaker 9 reflect harsh strategies against antisemitism, including deportation and criminal measures, while Speaker 9 notes threats against those who push antisemitic conspiracy theories. Speaker 16–17 recount legal actions against antisemitic rhetoric and antisemitism lawsuits; Speaker 18 describes the J7 diaspora network meeting to share information and best practices; Speaker 19–20 advocate reform of education and even limiting the First Amendment to protect it, arguing for control over speech. Speaker 3 and Speaker 20 discuss enforcement and punishment for anti-Israel or antisemitic speech; Speaker 1 highlights training 20,000 officers annually in extremism and hate via partnerships with law enforcement going back to the FBI’s origins. Speaker 29 calls opponents “a small bunch of wannabe Nazis” and asserts intent to pursue justice; Speaker 0 closes by proclaiming that history remembers action, not denial of hatred, and that we are on the cusp of a new age where technology’s powerful benefits can drive positive outcomes in agriculture, health, transportation, and other fields, enabling Israel to become a primary power rather than a secondary one.

Stop Antisemitism was built for confronting the global explosion of Jew hatred unleashed since the attacks of ten seven. Since that day, we have featured more than 1,000 antisemites on our platforms—not theorized about them, not quietly documented them, but featured them publicly, clearly, and with evidence. The results speak for themselves: approximately 400 of these Jew haters have faced real consequences including firings, suspensions, and expulsions. More than 300 remain in an active investigatory state across universities, corporations, DEI departments, unions, hospitals, nonprofits, and yes, federal government agencies. And five arrests to date tied directly to threats and violence of antisemitic conduct we helped expose. This is what accountability looks like. This is what action looks like. This is what pushing back hard looks like against the tidal wave of hate that has consumed The United States and global population. From our founding, Stop Antisemitism has operated on one guiding belief: Antisemitism thrives when there are no consequences. So we created consequences, a lot of them. We created visibility. We turned the spotlight towards those who targeted our community, making silence impossible. On campuses where Jewish students were hunted through libraries, where professors glorified Hamas and Hezbollah terrorists, where mobs shut down our buildings and administrators hid under desks, we stepped in. We documented the offenders. We worked with attorneys, lawmakers, and victim families, and we ensured the message was not unmistakable: If you target Jewish students, your actions will not disappear into the darkness. We will shine a light on you that thanks to Google and SEO, follow you for the rest of your life. When you look for a job, when you look for a spouse, when you look for a nanny, when you look for anything, our work will always be documented. Again, thanks to Google and SEO. In corporations where DEI leaders smeared Israel, excused Hamas, we pressured CEOs; some resigned, many were terminated, but policies were changed thankfully from governmental to art institutions. Online, where anonymous accounts spread violent threats, we traced patterns, elevated evidence, and worked with authorities leading to arrests from Florida, South Carolina, New York, California, and Texas. And we're not slowing down sadly. Today, Stop Antisemitism, I'm proud to say, runs one of the most robust antisemitic enforcement operations in The United States, monitoring campuses, digital networks, activist groups, and public officials, documenting incidents in real time and mobilizing millions of people, of allies that are quietly by our side. But the fight is bigger than the exposure, and it's about securing a future—A future where Jewish students can walk across a quad without being screamed at. A future where employers understand that anti Semitism is not activism. It's bigotry and it will cause you to lose your job. A future where fact, not propaganda, shapes policy. A future where global institutions from Google to chat, GPT, from governments to universities to media, finally treats Jew hatred with the seriousness of other minority-targeted hate. To get there, we need three things: action, real action as I listed; accountability; relentless vigilance, because antisemitism does not take breaks. It doesn't wait for elections. It doesn't disappear because we are exhausted and tired, and when I tell you myself and my team are exhausted and tired, that's the least of it. Stop antisemitism has never been more essential, more strategic, or more effective than it is now, but we cannot do this alone. The demand, the volume of tips, the number of investigations, sadly, it continues to grow instead of decrease. If we want a safer future for the Jewish people, this is the moment to stand together and act. We have to push harder to make it clear that Jewish safety is a nonnegotiable. Tonight, I'm asking you to always be in the fight with us, not just in spirit, but in true action. Participate in calls to action. Write letters to your governmental officials. Speak to the teachers and the college administrators that are making, if it's not your friends and kids, it's making other community members feel unsafe. When we act, lives change, And antisemites learn, sometimes for the very first time in their lives and history, that targeting Jews will come at a price, and together we can ensure that Jew hatred never goes unanswered again. As a former refugee from The USSR, I say this with all of my heart, God bless The United States, God bless Israel, and I'm Israel High. Thank you so much.

We are here to address the rise of antisemitism in schools, holding district leaders accountable for failing to address the issue. Jewish students face harassment and abuse, and it's time for change. We will continue to push for a safe learning environment until changes are made. Thank you for shining a light on this important issue.

Antisemitism and all forms of hate and violence have no place in America, and silence is complicity. The speaker is releasing the first ever national strategy to counter antisemitism. Twenty percent of people are haters, which equals 52,000,000 Americans. There are only 6.5 million Jews in the United States. Jews run the show in the world. Antisemitism is worse today than it was 20 years ago. The best way to deal with it from a position in elected office is to go on offense against antisemitism. The speaker thanks President Biden and Vice President Harris for their comprehensive actions to confront antisemitism, bigotry, and hate in all of its forms.

Earlier this year, there was Nazi imagery in our nation's capital, which was disturbing for the Jewish community and Canadians. Antisemitism is increasing online and in person, and must be addressed.

The speaker is releasing the first ever national strategy to counter antisemitism, stating that antisemitism and all forms of hate and violence have no place in America. It is claimed that Jews "run the show in the world" somehow, despite only numbering 6.5 million in the United States. It is asserted that antisemitism is worse today than it was 20 years ago. The best way to combat it from elected office is to go on offense against it. Thanks were given to President Biden and Vice President Harris for taking comprehensive actions to confront antisemitism, bigotry, and hate in all its forms.

Some members of parliament are pushing to nullify existing laws. This action would send a toxic message to the New South Wales community. Advocates for these changes need to explain what type of racist abuse they want people to have the right to say and be able to lawfully see on the streets of Sydney. Australia does not have the same freedom of speech laws as the United States because it aims to maintain a multicultural community where people can live in peace, free from vilification and hatred seen elsewhere.

We stopped playing defense and have moved to offense. You see this in our focus on the courts. In the past twelve months, ADL has filed more lawsuits than the prior one hundred and twelve years against extremist groups, elite universities, public companies, school districts, and state sponsors of terror. We've launched innovative products to intercept antisemitism before it takes root, whether in the boardroom or in chat rooms, large language models or academic associations, in Wikipedia entries or WhatsApp chats. This work matters, not just for the Jewish people, but for all of society.

The speaker addresses the issue of being labeled as antisemitic and shares that the ADL called them an antisemite. They mention that three Israelis they have spoken to don't see a problem with what they said. The speaker clarifies their definition of antisemitism as hating someone based on their Jewish identity, and they express respect for a Jewish person they have collaborated with. They argue that the label of antisemitism is used to silence dissent and give examples of how the ADL has broadened the term. The speaker also mentions their personal experience of being banned from Twitter and accuses the ADL of interfering in democratic processes in Europe. Another speaker adds that they support the right to criticize any group and shares their negative experience with the ADL.

Okay Emily, I would love to hear your take on everything that has been discussed so far. For those of you that don't know me, I speak a lot about antisemitism. I even try to bring Israel into the conversation. I know that's not what we're talking about here, but I do a lot of public speaking to combat antisemitism. I actually joined this room because I've spoken for ADL at events as a freelancer. We see eye to eye on some issues, and I feel like it's important to speak up in times of antisemitism.

The speaker is asked about allegations that they downplay Israel's role as a major player and that Zionists and Israel are trying to enslave the world. The speaker responds by mentioning that they have caught ADL-affiliated groups engaging in hate speech and that they won't play that game. They mention that many Jews are against the war and that they have Jewish friends who are diverse in their beliefs. The speaker states that they fight organized crime and that they get attacked because they speak out against it. They also mention how Arnold Schwarzenegger can openly say he admires Skettler and receive awards, while they are criticized for hating Hitler.

Over the past decade, anti-Semitism has shifted online, making it easier to generate and spread hateful content. To address this, the Ministry of Diaspora Affairs developed a system that monitors anti-Semitism on the entire internet, focusing on Facebook and Twitter. Using artificial intelligence, the system identifies around 10,000 anti-Semitic posts daily out of 200,000 suspect posts. By making this information public, it aims to shame individuals and deter anti-Semitism. Additionally, a command center in Tel Aviv analyzes the data and takes action, such as notifying law enforcement or city officials about specific instances. The speaker urges Facebook and Twitter to take responsibility and not allow anti-Semitism under the guise of freedom of speech.

Speaker 0 raises a question from the audience about whether the ADL has considered hiring people to counter-march, particularly with diverse ethnicities, to ensure marches are unopposed on social media and publicity. Speaker 1 responds: It’s important to “go where the puck is going” and not just to where it is. Since 10/07, resources have been redistributed toward LLMs and generative AI. He asks how many used ChatGPT in the last week, noting that ChatGPT has over a billion users and is ground truth for vast numbers of people, having existed for about two and a half years. While marching in the streets is one approach, he emphasizes building technology to train LLMs more effectively and working with leading AI companies. He specifies collaborations with OpenAI, Alphabet, Anthropic, Meta, and Microsoft, and says they are in conversations with Alibaba to train their LLM, highlighting that Chinese AI models are profound, potent, cost-effective, and spreading. He reiterates that marching in the streets is only one option, but the focus is on going where the puck is going by investing in Wikipedia, LLMs, and changing the game before it changes us.

A heated confrontation unfolds, with accusations of Nazism and hate crimes. One individual asserts their Jewish identity, while others engage in derogatory remarks and racial slurs. Discussions touch on perceived Jewish influence and the creation of division among races. Some express disdain for white supremacy and emphasize the need for unity, while others make inflammatory comments. A warning is issued against actions that could provoke violence and lead to stricter legislation against hate speech. The speaker denounces associations with extremist groups and distances themselves from hateful rhetoric, stressing the importance of credible discourse and rejecting any form of racism or bigotry.

Our union is under scrutiny for offering anti-Semitic educational materials to our 117,000 teachers and staff on our members-only website. One poster depicts a fist tearing the tongue from a snake, symbolizing Jews during Nazi Germany, while another shows a Palestinian with a rifle. Even former President Biden is labeled negatively for his support of Israel. During a legislative hearing on combating anti-Semitism, I, the union's president, defended our stance. When asked if certain imagery was anti-Semitic, I declined to evaluate it directly, emphasizing that our resources are meant for our members' professional consideration. Senator John Bellis, co-chair of the commission, criticized the resources as biased and anti-Israel, fearing their potential influence in classrooms. While we're not advocating for these resources to be used in teaching, they're intended to educate our members about the conflict.

National Security Investigations teams are a flying squad of hate disruptors who focus on high harm, high impact, politically motivated violence, communal violence, and hate crimes that don't meet the threshold for terrorism investigations, but that we know drive fear and division. This is all about stopping hate and division earlier and well before it leads to violence. So far, this crack squad has charged 14 individuals across 13 investigations, and of those, four individuals across four operations were charged for offenses relating to antisemitism. The teams were responsible for a recent week long national blitz on the distribution and display of prohibited symbols and for charging a passenger who only this week allegedly threatened violence toward a member of the Jewish community on a flight from Bali to Sydney. The announcement today to boost the numbers of our hate disruptors as well as planned changes to lower the threshold for hate speech will make it easier for the AFP to take action quicker. It could be the difference between us just knocking on a door to warn an individual to an individual being placed in handcuffs.

Jonathan (Speaker 0) and Michael (Speaker 2) along with Jonathan Conricus (Speaker 1) discuss the Australia Hanukkah attack, antisemitism, and the political context surrounding Palestinian statehood and Islamist extremism. They also touch on free speech, protests, and potential international implications. - Jonathan’s initial reaction to the Australian shooting: He was not surprised, framing it as part of a broader pattern he terms “globalize the Intifada.” He cites experiences in Australia, including Bondi Beach visits and conversations with the Jewish community, who he says feel betrayed by legislators and exposed by law enforcement. He argues the atmosphere in Australia has allowed antisemitic attacks, with radicals allowed to shout antisemitic slogans and attack synagogues. He accuses the Australian government of being weak and cowed, quick to side with Hamas and Palestinians while demonizing Israel, and contends this climate enabled violence against 2,000 Australian Jews celebrating Hanukkah. He calls for full support and protection for Jews in Australia and for leadership to change its stance toward global affairs. - Netanyahu connection and limiting principle: Michael notes Netanyahu’s August letter to Australian Prime Minister Albanese warning that support for a Palestinian state fuels antisemitic violence and benefits Hamas. Conricus is asked about a limiting principle: could endorsing Palestinian statehood by various figures (Ehud Barak, the UN Security Council’s Oslo-era blueprint, etc.) be linked to such attacks, potentially implicating many figures including Donald Trump? Conricus responds that the situation in Australia goes beyond a mere recognition of a Palestinian state and highlights the disquiet in Israel across political spectrum about linking Israel’s actions to global support for Palestinian statehood, especially after October 7 atrocities. - Protests and incitement: Jonathan argues the protests in Australia, including chants like “gas the Jews,” reflect incitement and a broader systemic failure by authorities who allowed Hamas supporters to dominate public spaces and harass Jews. He recounts encounters with Hamas supporters in Melbourne and claims police and local government enabled harassment against Jews, including demands Jews remove kippahs to avoid incitement. He says hate crimes against synagogues have gone unsolved and that this atmosphere of violence and antisemitism needs to change. - Pro-Palestinian vs pro-Hamas distinction: Michael asks where to draw the line between pro-Palestinian and pro-Hamas protesters. Conricus argues the distinction is artificial and notes that polls show Hamas is the most popular Palestinian political group, suggesting that many demonstrators imply support for Hamas even if they do not explicitly say so. He believes the dominant sentiment among protesters on October 7-8 was supportive of Hamas, even if framed as pro-Palestinian nationalism. He also mentions paid protesters, particularly in US/UK campus contexts, but emphasizes ideologically driven protesters. - Free speech and incitement: Michael insists that if protests include chants and actions that incite violence, this becomes a free-speech issue, citing First Amendment protections in the US and contrasting with other countries. Jonathan counters that incitement can justify restriction when it explicitly calls for violence against a protected group, noting that “gas the Jews” crosses lines beyond free speech, and criticizes Australian authorities’ tolerance of violent incitement. - Chronology and retaliation: The participants discuss the October 7 Hamas attack and Israel’s subsequent response. Jonathan clarifies that Hamas conducted an unprecedented, unprovoked attack killing 1,200 Israelis, with later identification of missing and abducted individuals. He describes Israel’s border closure and subsequent major offensive in Gaza. Michael points out debates around whether attackers’ motives included broader geopolitical narratives, while Jonathan underscores the gravity and scale of the October 7 killings and the need to acknowledge the initial atrocity. - Islam and Western integration: Jonathan addresses Islam as a monotheistic faith with nearly 2 billion followers, expressing no issue with Islam as a religion but concern about Islamist ideology and an imperialistic mindset. He cites Sweden’s immigration policy as an example of perceived societal strain and argues for cautions about cultural integration, border policies, and governance standards in Western societies. - Acknowledgment of individual bravery: They remark on Ahmed Ben Ahmed, a Muslim shop owner who helped defend Jews during the Australian attack, acknowledging his bravery and suggesting he should be recognized for valor. - Iran, Israel, and alleged blame: The discussion covers claims about Iran or Israel behind the attack. Michael asserts there is no evidence linking Mossad or Iran to the attack, while Jonathan suggests Iranian involvement is possible but not proven, noting Iranian propaganda and the potential for blowback, while maintaining that the attackers’ exact affiliations remain unclear. They note Iranian condemnation of the attacks, with skepticism about Iranian statements.

Speaker highlights a problem with antisemitism in this country, noting that statistics bear that they are seeing increased numbers. "We're gonna be very aggressive." "You heard from the FBI, the MPD." "We're gonna look for these cases." "We're gonna prosecute these cases to the full force of the law." "It's a problem when we're not gonna tolerate it." Antisemitism has historically been one of the biggest scabs in the world that keeps getting picked on and picked at. "So from my perspective, you know, I will go forward with every case with vengeance." The speaker emphasizes aggressive enforcement and full accountability.

We stopped playing defense and have moved to offense. You see this in our focus on the courts. In the past twelve months, ADL has filed more lawsuits than in the prior one hundred and twelve years against extremist groups, elite universities, public companies, school districts, and state sponsors of terror. We've launched innovative products to intercept antisemitism before it takes root, whether in the boardroom or in chat rooms, large language models or academic associations, in Wikipedia entries or WhatsApp chats. This work matters, not just for the Jewish people, but for all of society.

You see antisemitism, it's a predictable indicator of anti western sentiment. They're intertwined phenomenon, regardless of origin. As rabbi lord Jonathan Sacks of blessed memory once put it, the hate that starts with the Jews, it never ends with the Jews. That's why fighting antisemitism cannot be separated from the broader counter terrorism fight; the ideologies, the networks, they are deeply connected. Plain and simple, anti Semitism is a national security threat that must be defeated. At ADL, we've made our choice. We will never stop. Exposing those who try to justify their agenda of anti Jewish racism, whether they call it decolonization or cultural preservation or whatever. We will never stop resisting those who try to impose their anti Semitic nihilism on us, whether they dress it up as anti Zionism or National Socialism. Not now, not ever. So thank you, Shana Tova and Am Yisrael Fahed.

Jonathan asks for commentary on Nick Fuentes, what countermeasures are effective, and what the government’s role should be in being critical of such a platform. The respondent explains that Nick Fuentes’ second name is Joseph, and that Fuentes is a Hispanic person described as an open, unapologetic racist, homophobe, and anti-Semite. He notes that Fuentes has been incredibly effective at spreading his message thanks to X and social media, which act as super spreaders of anti-Semitism and hate, making Fuentes like patient zero. He points out that it didn’t help when former President Trump had Fuentes over for dinner at Mar-a-Lago, and he criticizes those in power who don’t renounce Fuentes. JD Vance has done so, but the current right faces a challenge with elevated bad voices like Fuentes, Tucker Carlson, and Candace Owens, while there are good voices on the right such as Ted Cruz, Ben Shapiro, and Mark Levin who push back on figures like Speaker Johnson and the revolting lunatics. To defeat rising anti-Semitism on the right, he believes it must come from the right; to defeat rising anti-Zionism on the left, it must come from people on the left. At AADL, the goal is to provide data and tools and to operate behind the scenes rather than publicly targeting Fuentes or Hassan Piker; the speaker even calls Hassan Piker “Hamas Piker” and notes his large platform on Twitch, Steam, YouTube, and Instagram. The speaker emphasizes working to get platforms to enforce terms of service to pull down the most offensive hate speech, or compel action from the platforms. However, he also stresses the need for people on the right to take down figures like Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes, and for people on the left to support similar efforts. The second speaker adds that in a sermon about the nuance of every human being, they did not mean Nick Fuentes.

The speaker holds a unique role at a tech company, focusing on the Jewish diaspora. Their work involves empowering Jewish communities globally and addressing their concerns on a local level. A key aspect of this role is removing hate speech and content targeting Jewish people, including Holocaust denial and harmful stereotypes. The speaker emphasizes working with global partners to refine content policies and address coded antisemitism. Beyond content removal, the speaker highlights using platforms to promote authoritative information. A partnership with the World Jewish Congress and UNESCO directs users searching for Holocaust-related terms to factual resources. The speaker also considers how to address antisemitism and promote education within emerging technologies like VR, AR, and XR, collectively known as the metaverse.

Speaker 0 explains that last week, leaders of the world’s seven largest Jewish communities convened in Australia as part of the twenty twenty five J Seven summit. This summit is organized by the ADL as part of the J Seven task force to combat antisemitism, and it brings together a convening of representative bodies of the largest Jewish communities on Earth. Speaker 1 describes the J Seven as comprising the seven largest diaspora communities. They meet every other week via Zoom to share information and best practices, including what has worked for their communities, what hasn’t worked, and what might work elsewhere. They share tips, draft legislation that might work in other countries, or discuss different litigation. A central element has been this consultation, where they can learn from each other, learn the trends that are coming in, learn the techniques that others have used successfully, and what might be coming their way. The point is that “what happened in Montreal could happen in Melbourne, and what happens in New York or London or Paris, will make its way to Buenos Aires.” That is the first emphasis. Second, they speak in one voice, in certain aspects on key advocacy. For example, when they left Australia, their call to action was on the Australian government to move forward the special envoy Jillian Siegel’s plan on antisemitism, which had been stalled for a number of months, to accept it and to implement it. It was significant that the leaders of the seven largest diaspora communities went to Australia to show solidarity publicly with the community, with government leaders, and with the media, and also to make this joint call to action. Finally, they have meetings that are some off the record, some on the record, with world leaders in which they share their community’s concerns and call for action. Thus, the J Seven is described as both a really important body for consultation and learning from each other as well as an effective tool when they can come together and speak in one voice.

We stopped playing defense and have moved to offense. You see this in our focus on the courts. In the past twelve months, ADL has filed more lawsuits than the prior one hundred and twelve years against extremist groups, elite universities, public companies, school districts, and state sponsors of terror. We've launched innovative products to intercept antisemitism before it takes root, whether in the boardroom or in chat rooms, large language models or academic associations, in Wikipedia entries or WhatsApp chats. This work matters, not just for the Jewish people, but for all of society.