TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The documentary-style segment follows Nick Shirley and David as they investigate widespread fraud in Minnesota, centering on nonemergency medical transportation (NEMT), daycare operations, and the way state funds are billed for services that may not be delivered. They present a pattern where transportation companies appear to underpin multiple fraud schemes across childcare, adult daycare, autism services, and interpreter services, with transportation acting as the “belly of the beast” that ties these lines of fraud together. Key findings and claims include: - The investigation asserts that Minnesota’s NEMT sector is dominated by Somali-owned companies. David notes about 20 NEMT companies in Minnesota, with more than 90% Somali-owned, many hosted in addresses that appear noncommercial or vacant (an apartment, a house, a convenience store, or a vacant building) with little or no signage or staff. - The group argues the average national vehicle count per NEMT company is 20. They estimate Minnesota could have approximately 800 Somali-owned NEMT companies, each with about 20 vehicles, and claim payments from the state are based on electronic submissions of trips and miles, with trips typically paid at about $50 per trip (round trips $100). They contend many trips are never performed, yet payments are made once the electronic form is submitted, with no verification of actual service delivery. - The symposium of fraud is described as consisting of daycares, adult daycares, autism services, and other welfare providers that rely on the transportation brokers to create a paper-trail justifying payments to the providers, even when services aren’t delivered. This paper trail allegedly enables continued state funding for many supposedly operating centers. - Safari Transportation (607 Cedar Avenue South, Minneapolis) and Dreamline Transportation (617 Cedar Avenue South) are presented as examples of fraudulent listings: Safari Transportation is alleged not to exist at the listed address; Dreamline Transportation is said to be housed in a liquor store at 617 Cedar Avenue South, with multiple addresses showing confusing or false registration. On-site checks reveal no functioning transportation company or vans, and staff acknowledge the addresses are misleading. The reporting team notes that the listed addresses often correspond to other, non-transport businesses (e.g., money-wiring shops or liquor stores), with no observable fleet and no evidence of active transportation services. - They visit other addresses tied to transportation, such as Epimonia Transport (at 305/308 area) and Crescent Transportation in Saint Louis Park; Epimonia is described as lacking vehicles and consistency in address listings, while Crescent Transportation is found to be an apartment complex rather than a storefront, casting doubt on the legitimacy of these entities. - The Hopkins Child Care Center is highlighted as an example of large state funding for a facility licensed for 118 children, with reported funding of around $2.25 million for a given year and millions across multiple years, yet the center is observed as shuttered or lacking visible child activity, with many vehicles reportedly idle and windows blacked out. Similar patterns are noted at other daycare centers such as Quality Learning Center and Proud Child Care Center in Eden Prairie, which also show high funding receipts (e.g., $1.9 million for Quality Learning Center in a given year; Proud Child Care Center receiving about $1.25–$1.26 million in recent years), but with no apparent foot traffic or detectable enrollment. - The investigation connects the fraud to political actors and public officials, alleging cover-ups or complicity, and raises questions about accountability for figures like Tim Walz. They assert that investigations and governmental actions have been insufficient or misdirected to address the alleged fraud. - In a broader fraud narrative, they claim millions of dollars were being funneled through TSA at Minneapolis–Saint Paul International Airport, with whistleblowers recounting large sums (often in the millions) moved by Somali-descent individuals, sometimes via routes through Atlanta to Dubai before wiring money to Somalia. A former TSA narcotics investigator describes routine cash movements at checkpoints, suggesting that declarations of large sums did not trigger meaningful enforcement, and implying the funds were linked to the daycare and welfare networks described earlier. Throughout, the speakers attempt to confront individuals at various sites, record responses, and juxtapose the alleged abundance of funding with the lack of visible services or vehicles. They emphasize that even when fraud is spotlighted, participants often respond with hostility or denial, while security is required to manage confrontations. They conclude with a call for accountability and reforms, asserting that the fraud spans the entire state and that transportation companies are central to the ability to sustain fraudulent payments.

Speaker 0 summarizes the issue with prepackaged ground meat at multiple major retailers, including Kroger, Target, Walmart, Aldi, Food Lion, Piggly Wiggly, Whole Foods, and Fresh Thyme. He states that none of these packages tell you where the meat comes from, where it’s packaged, or what procedures were used to ensure safety. Behind the counter, employees say there’s information on the back to scan with your phone that leads to an FDA website. He claims the FDA website “could either be three d printed” and “could be a how do I put a cloned animal,” and that if that’s a problem, “well, TikTok, you need to check the the FDA website because it says it could be.” He urges caution, concluding with, “Let’s just say this, our food ain't food anymore.”

Speaker 0: You trust Costco with your family's dinner, but their meat undergoes a controversial process that's banned in several countries. Speaker 1: Everyone loves Costco chicken or even that rotisserie chicken from Walmart or your favorite grocery store. But what if that label on that rotisserie bird isn't telling you the whole story? What you're about to learn could change the way that you buy protein forever. Costco chicken is beloved and seen as a great deal. I know this. But recent discussions about preservatives, labeling accuracy, and contamination has put that belief at risk. Guys, look. Speaker 2: Costco is facing a lawsuit over its popular rotisserie chickens. A group of shareholders filed the lawsuit against the company over its treatment in raising chickens. Speaker 0: You trust Costco with your family's dinner, but their meat undergoes a controversial process that's banned in several countries. Most shoppers have no idea this is happening right under their noses. The real question isn't what they're doing. It's why they're allowed to do it. You know that famous $5 rotisserie chicken at Costco? The one that's been the same price since Obama was president? Well, there's a juicy secret they don't want you knowing about. Speaker 1: They label it as no preservatives, guys. And this goes hand in hand with Walmart and your probably your favorite grocery store. This is what I would call a huge scandal. There's a reason why those chickens have been four ninety nine since 2009. It's to get you in the store. It's to get you to spend a ton of money, and they've cut a lot of corners to make sure that it's cheap and easy to produce for you. Welcome, guys. My name's Cohen from Riverside Homestead. What I do is I give you guys value. I do the digging so you don't have to do it. So if you appreciate that, hit the thumbs up right now. Let the community know where you're chiming in from, what state, and let me crush your dreams on rotisserie chicken like ugh. Trust me. I know. So watch. This chicken is labeled as no preservatives, guys. And this goes hand in hand with Walmart and your probably your favorite grocery store. This is what I would call a huge scandal. There's a reason why those chickens have been four ninety nine since 2009. It's to get you in the store. It's to get you to spend a ton of money, and they've cut a lot of corners to make sure that it's cheap and easy to produce for you. Welcome, guys. My name's Cohen from Riverside Homestead. What I do is I give you guys value. I do the digging so you don't have to do it. So if you appreciate that, hit the thumbs up right now. Let the community know where you're chiming in from, what state, and let me crush your dreams on rotisserie chicken like ugh. Trust me. I know. So watch. This chicken is labeled as no preservatives, organic, healthy as it gets. We've talked about this before on this channel. Loopholes. Speaker 0: Costco injects every single rotisserie chicken with a phosphate solution before it hits those warming lights. Think you're buying pure chicken? Think again. You're paying for water with a side of poultry. This liquid injection makes each bird weigh significantly more, So you're essentially buying a sponge that's been soaked in chemical juice. Speaker 1: Did you guys know that these chickens are only about six weeks old because of everything that they pump into them? It's a marketing ploy to get you through the door for the cheap chicken and buy everything else. And there's active lawsuits right now. This is especially bred chicken in horrible conditions. Speaker 3: Grown and fattened on likely corn and soy that's GMO to create this chicken in six weeks that you're eating. They take it to a mass slaughter house where they dip it in chlorine and other toxins to make it safe, and it's leaving those residues on the chicken. And this bird isn't just seasoned with normal herbs and spices. They have preservatives in here like sodium phosphate that's linked to liver and kidney damage and carrageenan, which can degrade into polygenin, which is a known inflammatory agent and possible carcinogen. Speaker 1: Yeah. I found information on that from another doctor. Speaker 4: Doctor Tanya, what's one thing you never buy from the grocery store? Rotisserie chicken. Why? The bag the chicken is stored in is plastic, and it leaches chemicals that get into the food when it's sitting under the heat. Most stores inject the chickens with additives so that they can last on the shelf longer. Chickens are often marinated in a preservative solution. We opt for preservative free cosmetics, and then we're eating preservative infested chicken. And carrageenan. This is a chemical that precooked poultry is injected with to make it tender and juicy, but guess what? It can also inflame the gut. Carrageenan is banned in Europe, but not in The United States. Speaker 1: Yet again, another ingredient item banned in other countries, but allowed in The US. I know we love it because it's such a good deal. It's cheap. It's easy. It's taste great. I'm on the struggle bus with you guys on this one, but I'm reading countless articles, discussion about preservatives, labeling accuracy and contamination that has put all this belief at risk. Now I recently was at a Costco filming this right here. I was there. I saw it. It says no added hormones or steroids in a chicken that is fully developed in six weeks. Right there at the bottom, you can see it says no added preservatives. And have you ever wondered why it's in a plastic bag that you can put in your microwave? Microwave safe, plastic bag, put the two and two together. Speaker 3: Right out of the oven stored in a plastic bag. Nobody really knows what type of plastic bag this is, but it's likely a mix of polyethylene terephthalate. Remember that word phthalate? It's a known hormone disruptor, and this is microwave safe. So you're putting hot food into a plastic bag that can leach these hormone disrupting chemicals, and a 117,000,000 of these are eaten each year in The US. So share this video with your friends. Speaker 1: This is what I'm talking about. Hundreds of thousand millions of these chickens are sold in The US a year. This is why you need to share this out. Sorry folks, but they're just cutting too many corners these days. And it comes down to us. And who's gonna suffer? Us. They're gonna make a ton of money. So if you dive into the legal term no preservatives, they found loopholes to where they can actually put this legally. This is where the class action lawsuit or the lawsuit from a couple people in California are like, hold up. Wait a minute, you guys are using this stuff and this is preservatives, but you guys are saying it's no preservatives. In short, the processing agents that they're using can be deemed not to be called preservatives. Oh yeah, you're getting something with no preservatives, organic as it gets. Yet at the end of the day, you and I would look at that cross eyed and be like, Yeah, what they're using works the same way. It's not what you think it is. That's just what it is. I'm not sure if you guys have seen what these large scale poultry processing facilities look like, but it's not happy chickens walking around a field eating green grass and bugs. Think about the cross contamination that occurs and what safeguards exist and where they fail. For certain that these huge plants they fail. Great thing for Costco is they can scale. They can pump out millions of birds in six weeks and give it to us for a low price even with them losing money. That's right. Like I said, scammedemic kind of they will take a loss on this because they're producing at such a large scale and cutting corners just to get you through the door for that $4 and 99 rotisserie chicken so that you put hundreds of dollars of their stuff in your cart and check out. Other stores, Walmart, other grocery stores, they have caught on to this. They know what Costco found out. They're all doing the same thing. This is information that you need to consider. Speaker 5: Alright, guys. Here are three scary facts about Costco chicken that'll hopefully make you never buy this shit ever again. Alright. So I had to move on over to Lowe's to show you part two of this video. So they start by bathing the chicken in chlorine. They actually put it in a chlorine bath, and it soaks in this chlorine for about thirty minutes. Why does that and should that matter to you? I'm gonna tell you. Next thing they do is they inject the chicken with a chemical compound called TSP. It's trisodium phosphate. Guys, I'm just at Lowe's pulling this stuff off the shelves. This is crazy. I mean, this is the shit that you're allowing into your body. Read the warning label on this and tell me that this is a good idea to ingest in the human body. And then the last thing, which is I don't know if it's scarier than the other two things. They're all really bad. But they they let the chicken sit in these plastic bags, and they sit there for days on end, hours, days, whatever. It's sitting in your fridge for probably a long time. There are microplastics being released into the chicken from the plastic bags that are getting into your body, and it is unbelievably bad for you. Mean, there's microplastics showing up in human hearts, in in in men's testicles. Like, it's really, really bad, guys. So here's the deal. Everyone's gonna ask me, what do I do? Buy your chickens local. Go to your local farmer's market. Go to your local farms. They are a little bit more expensive, so just eat less or go or or just be resourceful and find deals. But stop buying this shit because it's literally killing you. Speaker 1: When I go to Home Depot and I pull TSP off the shelves, what kind of chemical is that? Speaker 6: So when you grab TSP at Home Depot, you're holding trisodium phosphate. It's a heavy duty cleaner, often used to degrease and prep surfaces before painting. Powerful stuff. Just use it with care. Speaker 1: What's the caution label say? Speaker 6: The caution label on TSP usually warns about skin and eye irritation. So gloves and goggles are a must. It'll also say not to inhale the dust and to keep it away from kids. Basically, respect the power and you'll be good. Speaker 1: What if you eat it? Speaker 6: If you ingest TSP, it's no joke. It can cause serious irritation. Think burns in your mouth, throat and stomach. The label will tell you to seek medical help immediately. No waiting. Speaker 1: So yeah, definitely not a seasoning. Speaker 1: But if you go down the rabbit hole on that one, it's gonna say that it's a different type and it's the safe version and the FDA would never allow that specific one in your food. Just a different one. So when they put it in like rotisserie chicken, they're probably just putting safe amounts of it. Speaker 6: Oh no, don't worry. They're not putting TSP in your rotisserie chicken. That'd be a disaster. Some food safe phosphates might be used in processing, totally different and regulated, but the cleaning product TSP strictly for walls, not wings. Speaker 1: Are you sure it's not the same thing? Because a lot of reels say it's the same thing. Speaker 6: Yeah. I get why those reels pop up, but trust me, food grade phosphates and TSP cleaner are not the same. The food versions are heavily regulated for safety. If they try tossing the Home Depot stuff in your chicken, the FDA would have a feel day. So no worries. Speaker 1: I'm telling you guys, it's a deep dive in half. Make informed decisions. Realize that these big companies are all about making the money, not about bringing you the safest product. And trust me, it's a little bit of a stab to me too because I like easy, I like tasty and we need that sometimes. But in this case, they may have jumped through too many hoops too many times, and it's putting Us consumers possibly in a bad position. Speaker 1: I've got two other great videos. If you guys didn't see these videos, you gotta watch these. These will blow your mind equally as much. Please let me know what you think down in the comments. Thumbs up. Share this out and subscribe because I've got a lot more coming down the pipe. Keep prepping, keep learning, keep doing. We'll see you guys on the next one.

Out of Vernon, they’re bringing the hay. Ideal Lease is carrying the hay. They probably don't know what they're being used for. Katie and the family wanna stay with their animals so they're fed how they're supposed to be fed, as Karen explained yesterday, there’s protocols to be the animals are used to a certain type of feeding style. Jeff over here was calling Ideal Lease and telling him, calling Supersave. Supersave trucks right now have tape on the number and what their and the company name, and the guy is wearing a SuperSave shirt. "SuperSave's the fencing. They would be the disposal bins." Supersave is masking their identity so that people don't know what they're doing. Track down Supersave in the North Okanagan. They wanna take a contract, and they're trying to hide who they are, super safe, and ideal lease. They're carrying the hay to help the CFIA feed the animals because Katie and Karen and Dave are gonna be removed. Jeff was phoning Supersave letting them know what they were doing.

Speaker 0: A quiet building in Signal Hill, California, is described as not resembling the headquarters of hundreds of trucking companies. Federal records show nearly 700 freight companies tied to this single address, with roughly 500 listing the same email: WTF FMCSA@AOL.com. CRAX reported this exact address to federal regulators two years ago. The speaker asks, If we all know about it and we reported it, why is something not being done?

The speaker criticizes Maine Community Foundation for distributing funds intended for mass shooting survivors in Lewiston into ways that did not benefit those affected. They claim money has gone directly to Africa to fund weapons of war and that the portion retained in the Lewiston community has not benefited anyone who was present the night of the shooting. They state they first wrote to Council President Chitum in March about how Gateway Community Services used funds that were never intended for them, a point reportedly covered by the Main Wire at the time. The council president has since publicly aligned with a local consultant who had a major role in the fund distribution, which the speaker characterizes as an allegiance to someone other than constituents. Lewiston Auburn Youth Network (LAYN) is named as another nonprofit that received mass shooting funds. The speaker notes that LAYN previously claimed to be located at 210 Blake Street and even asserted they operated inside a condemned building. When the speaker emailed concerns about LAYN, Chitam (Chidam) responded that they do very good work, but the speaker reports they cannot find video or photographic evidence of such work. Chidam reportedly declined to respond to a later email seeking specifics about LAYN’s work or what was done when inspecting their listed location, which the speaker says did not occur. Gunfire data from the community is presented: 36 confirmed instances in 2023, 36 in 2024, and 37 so far this year. The speaker notes these figures exclude unconfirmed gunfire sounds frequently heard by residents. The speaker lists several agencies—Generational Newer Lewiston Auburn Youth Network, Mirrors if Got Community Services, AK Collaborative Empowered Immigrant Women Unite New Mainers Public Health Initiative, and Somali Bantu Community Association—as having received portions of the mass shooting donations after writing to the committee about how their clientele fled war and violence and were traumatized. The speaker observes that some of these same agencies stood with the police at multiple community forums aiming to curb gun violence over the years, and notes that gunfire in the streets has literally increased since they received money. The speaker urges the community to reflect on this. As Maine’s nonprofit fraud situation grows, the speaker says it rivals what’s seen in Minnesota and again asks Lewiston City Council to use all available powers to make right the re-victimization of families when money donated for mass shooting relief was distributed to unrelated agencies that used the tragedy as a personal money grab.

The speaker witnessed 24 large cardboard containers of ballots being loaded onto their trailer. They noticed that the envelopes had handwritten return addresses and one was marked as registered mail. The speaker was initially not concerned about it but found it strange when they were made to wait for six hours in Harrisburg without being allowed to unload. They were then instructed to drive to Lancaster without unloading in Harrisburg, which didn't make sense to them. The transportation supervisor refused to give them a ticket or a late slip. The next day, the speaker discovered that their trailer was missing. They found it unusual and decided to speak up about the situation.

A documentary-style investigation in Minnesota accuses widespread government-funded fraud across childcare, elder care, and health care services, alleging that hundreds of millions (potentially billions) of taxpayer dollars were funneled to fraudulent businesses, many run by Somali-owned entities, with insufficient or no evidence of actual children or patients being served. Key figures and setup - David: An investigator whose office is in Minneapolis, claiming firsthand exposure to fraud. He frames the problem as deeply entrenched, involving billions of dollars and potentially ties to terrorist groups abroad. - Nick Shirley: The presenter and filmmaker, documenting the investigation, confronting daycare centers, health care providers, and government officials. Main fraud allegations and examples - Childcare and early learning centers: - Multiple Minneapolis daycares listed at the same addresses, licensed for large capacities (e.g., 120 children) but with no children present in long-running site visits. - Examples include Mako Childcare and Mini Childcare Center: combined licensing for 120 children, but vans never moving and no children observed over repeated visits; fiscal year payments ranged from about 714,000 to over 1.6 million dollars for the two centers in various years. - ABC Learning Center and other nearby facilities: windows blocked out, doors locked, no children observed despite licensing for dozens or hundreds of children; payments in the hundreds of thousands to millions per year. - Sweet Angel Childcare and others: similar patterns—license capacity reported, payments received, but no children seen; in one case, ongoing operation with no obvious play area or evidence of childcare. - The video notes cases where two daycares share addresses or switch names (e.g., Creative Minds Daycare reopens as Super Kids Daycare Center) yet continue to receive state funding, suggesting “fraudulent” billing. - Some locations claimed to be open long hours and to serve many children, yet on-site visits found no children, locked doors, or hostile responses when questioned. In one instance, a staffer refused to discuss the operation or provide paperwork. - Specific sums cited include ownership of facilities with payments like 1.26 million, 987 thousand, 714 thousand, 1.6 million, 1.3 million, 1.0–1.6 million in various fiscal years, totaling near several millions per site and aggregating toward millions across multiple centers. - Home health care and other services: - A building housing 14 Somali-owned home health care companies under many different names, all operating from the same location, raising concerns about service provision and billing. - A broader claim that in Minnesota, 14–22 Somali health care businesses at the same address are part of the same ecosystem; government money (state and federal CCAP funding) is disbursed to these entities, with a perception that services may not be rendered as billed. - A separate building contains numerous health care providers; the interviewee asserts that 50–60 million dollars per year could be fraudulently routed through this single building. - Overall scale and claims: - David asserts the fraud is “far worse than anybody can imagine” with estimates initially as high as 7 to 10 billion, later revised publicly to around 8 billion; in total, a major portion of the state budget is implicated. - A central claim is that funds from CCAP (a blend of federal and state money, taxpayer money) are written as checks to providers who may not deliver corresponding services; the state’s checks are allegedly not effectively cross-checked for actual service provision. - Political and procedural dimensions: - The investigation contends that Minnesota governor Tim Walz is responsible for allowing or failing to curb fraud, describing the state as “ground zero” for the issue and criticizing political and procedural inaction. - The documentary frames fraud as nonpartisan, noting Medicaid fraud occurs across parties and administrations nationwide, but then presents a partisan friction as they confront lawmakers at a state Capitol hearing. - At the Capitol hearing, Republicans and Democrats discuss fraud, with some speakers asserting the problem is nonpartisan and rooted in systemic issues across administrations, while others push to hold specific leaders accountable and emphasize the need for transparency and enforcement. Confrontations and outcomes - The team encounters resistance and hostility at several sites, including doors locked, hostile staff, and in one instance, a confrontation resulting in police involvement at a building housing healthcare providers. - The investigators claim to have faced intimidation and even threats; they describe instances of violence toward them for asking questions about child and elder care fraud. - The film documents a tense, complex landscape of allegations, aiming to connect misallocated funds to non-delivered services, with ongoing investigations, raids, and political debate as the state capital becomes a focal point for accountability discussions.

There were suspicious donations made in the name of the speaker, but they do not recognize them. The donations were made using their name and address for small amounts, but the speaker usually only donates around $75. They suspect someone else may be using their information for larger donations. The speaker wants a refund for the unauthorized donations and would have noticed if they were making such large contributions.

The video documents a visit to what is alleged to be Halauli Childcare Center in Kent, Washington. Speaker 0 asks, “Hi. Is this is this Halauli childcare?,” and is told, “No. No? There’s no childcare here?” They respond, “No childcare. Okay. God. Thank you so much. Have a good one.” The clip repeats, “There’s no childcare,” and notes that they were at Halauli, described as “what’s allegedly Halauli Childcare Center in Kent, Washington,” which is “right behind me right here.” The speaker says they went to the door and mentions that the exact address listed on the state website shows the center receiving over $800,000 in 2023. The closing remark reiterates, “They claim there’s no child care here.”

Speaker 0: Massive fraud is going on here in the state of Minnesota, especially in Minneapolis. Explain to me what's going on with the day cares. Speaker 1: One of the things I've noticed is there’s an exceptional number of childcare centers set up mostly in Minneapolis, but also in Saint Paul. I wondered how many kids are there in the Twin Cities. I visited facilities near my office and saw there aren’t any kids there. I’d go to another one and there aren’t any kids there either. I spoke with someone outside who said, “We’re all full,” yet when I looked inside the door was open and there was a couch and a table with a couple chairs and no kids. I asked if the kids were outside playing or what kind of place this was, and the staffer said, “You go,” and followed me down the street to my car. That made me think something was going on, and this was maybe five years ago. Speaker 1: This fraud is so massive. When the dust settles on this, it’s going to be found to be the largest fraud in the history of the country and probably the world. The ones I’ve gotten data on average about $2,500,000 a year, and a lot of them will say they have anywhere from 80 to 120 children. Speaker 1: I’ve been to literally 40 or 50 of these childcare centers, and there never has been a single child at any one of them ever. Morning, afternoon, evening. Some say they’re open till 10:00 at night. I go there in the morning, I go there in the afternoon, I go there at 9:00 at night. Nobody. There are no kids there ever.

Trucks from a company called Runbeck were continuously delivering ballots for several days. The speaker is unsure of the exact duration but mentions that they were still coming in on their last day, which was the 10th. Runbeck is a high-speed scanning company that handles the scanning and printing of duplications, possibly including military ballots. The speaker is uncertain about the purpose of scanning the ballots off-site and whether they were printed or scanned. They mention that the high-speed scanning happens at Runbeck and that there were no observers present. The speaker also raises questions about the origin of the ballots and suggests asking county employees for clarification.

The speaker raises the question of the whereabouts of "Jessie's trailer" and its route after leaving, in relation to 24 pallets of ballots. The speaker's London Centre intelligence team estimated the ballots, tying it to a story of ballots appearing in counting rooms at night, tracing back to "Jesse's mass transportation." Investigations are ongoing beyond Bethpage. The speaker clarifies that the Bethpage Center is a bulk mail center, not a place to process individual mail pieces, implying the ballots were bundled and ready to be counted. Depending on density, the 24 pallets could contain 144,000 to a quarter-million ballots. The investigation suggests multiple trucks were involved. The speaker claims that ballots appeared and were counted, but do not necessarily match voter records. The speaker believes there is evidence of a massive transfer of completed, curated ballots ready to be injected into counting centers.

Speaker 0 is bringing supplies to Asheville via plane and helicopters, accompanied by people with special forces experience due to gangs hijacking trucks. Speaker 0 received a call from someone on the ground stating that FEMA is confiscating privately collected food from churches and schools. According to four unnamed sources, FEMA officials are telling these organizations that they can no longer distribute the food and that FEMA will take over distribution. They are allegedly threatening to withdraw FEMA support from communities that don't comply. Speaker 0 plans to investigate these claims in person.

In Columbus, Ohio, in front of the Great Minds Learning Academy, one of several day care centers associated with the Somali community, speakers discuss a report by Nick Shirley about fraudulent daycare facilities in Minneapolis. They note this is the second-largest Somali community in the United States and intend to investigate further. The team attempts to visit the first center, knocking and ringing the doorbell, but no one answers and the door is locked. They speak with a local man who says the daycare is owned by Somalians and mentions that he has never seen children there, noting that the center “use[s] the back door,” so they don’t see anyone coming in or out. He lives in the same building and confirms that he has not seen kids at the location. Another speaker reiterates, “I’ve just seen it the building itself. I’ve never seen nobody come out the building or go into the building.” The group proceeds to the back of the building, as suggested, but finds nothing there. They decide to move on, noting there are many more centers to visit, and plan to go around the city to speak with people at additional locations. They sign off with a plan to continue the investigation and stay tuned.

Various families of Sandy Hook School shooting victims are accused of receiving free houses, with detailed examples provided. The speaker questions the legitimacy of these transactions and implies foul play. The families mentioned include the Engles, Hartmans, Hockleys, Hues, Hubbards, Kowalskis, and Lewis. The speaker challenges these families, especially Scarlett Lewis, for allegedly receiving free houses and questions the motives behind these transactions.

I saw 24 Gaylords of ballots loaded into my trailer, with handwritten return addresses. I was delayed in Harrisburg, then told to drive to Lancaster without unloading. The transportation supervisor refused to provide a ticket or late slip. The next day, my trailer was missing. I believe the events on October 21st were suspicious, as I transported ballots from New York to Pennsylvania without understanding why. I decided to speak out about it.

The speaker raises the question of the whereabouts and route of Jesse's trailer, which allegedly transported 24 pallets of ballots. The speaker's London Center intelligence team estimated the number of ballots. The speaker claims these ballots appeared in counting rooms in the middle of the night and were traced back to Jesse's mass transportation. The speaker states the Bethpage Center is a bulk mail center, not a place to process individual mail pieces, yet these ballots were bundled, processed, and ready to be counted. The speaker estimates the 24 gaylords could contain 144,000 to a quarter-million ballots. The speaker suggests Jesse was not alone and multiple trucks were involved. The speaker claims ballots showed up and were counted, but don't necessarily match records of who should have voted, and the stats don't add up. The speaker believes there is evidence of a massive transfer of completed, curated ballots ready to be injected into counting centers.

Anomalies occurred with Jesse's trailer. It wasn't unloaded in Harrisburg, even though it contained mail for that location. Jesse waited six hours without explanation. Jesse spoke to a postal supervisor, which is unusual, and was refused a ticket proving he was there. Jesse was told to go to Lancaster while carrying the Harrisburg mail. At the end of his shift, Jesse's trailer was gone from the dock in Lancaster. Digital logs indicate someone else operated his tractor. These anomalies likely occurred because individuals needed to conceal the trailer's contents, specifically completed ballots transported across state lines. The speaker believes the ballots were put on the wrong truck, and Jesse was the wrong person to transport them.

- The evidence, through eyewitness testimony corroborated by others, shows that a 130,000 to 280,000 completed ballots for the twenty twenty general election were shipped from Bethpage, New York to Lancaster, Pennsylvania, where those ballots and the trailer in which they were shipped disappeared. - On October 21, there was a series of unusual events that cannot be a coincidence. I know I saw ballots with return addresses filled out, thousands of them, thousands, loaded onto my trailer in New York and headed for Pennsylvania. At first, I didn't think it was a big deal. In fact, I thought it was really awesome. I was like, sweet. I'm doing something for the presidential race. You know? This is cool. But as things became weirder, I got to thinking and wondered why I was driving complete ballots from New York to Pennsylvania. I didn't know why, so I decided to speak up. And that's what I'm doing today. - It could be a 144 to over, to a quarter million ballots. Part of our developing investigation indicates that Jesse wasn't alone. There was a number, as in like a bunch of different trucks which engaged in this. So when you think about the magnitude of potential votes showing up the night of the election after midnight, you have to have an artifact. So if you eliminate the impossible with all things being equal, whatever remains must be the truth. The truth is ballot showed up. They were counted. They do not match necessarily the records of who should have voted. In some instances, the stats don't add up, and we continue to analyze that. - With that said, I believe beyond a shadow of a doubt, we have evidence of a massive transfer of completed curated ballots ready to be injected into counting centers.

A building in Signal Hill, California appears to be the headquarters for nearly 700 freight companies, according to federal records. Approximately 500 of these companies share the same email address: WTFfmcsa@aol.com. CRAX reported this address to federal regulators two years ago. The speaker questions why no action has been taken despite the report.

I am a concerned parent in North Texas, reporting from the site of the upcoming School Center for Antiwoke Messaging (SCAM). Unlike public schools, which are free and mandated by the Texas state constitution, SCAM charges $10,400 in tuition per year. The school lacks a building and oversight, and its board of directors includes individuals who are not affiliated with the school but support the scam. SCAM promises not to teach woke subjects like science, history, or literature. Instead, they focus on the basics and reinforce whatever beliefs parents provide without encouraging questions. Additionally, SCAM plans to hire unqualified chaplains instead of certified teachers.

We're providing free meals for fire victims today, but some individuals taking food from the distribution center do not have burned homes. I confirmed that their houses did not burn down. To investigate further, I visited an evacuation shelter and found that they do not inquire about the legal status of those present. It appears that tax-funded resources are being redirected by the Red Cross to provide food and shelter for illegal migrants instead of solely for fire victims.

The speaker challenges Maine Community Foundation’s distribution of funds intended for victims of a mass shooting in Lewiston, arguing that many survivors still have unpaid hospital bills and that some money went directly to Africa to fund weapons of war. They claim that the portion remaining in the Lewiston community did not benefit those present the night of the shooting, and that they do not know how most of the money was used. They state they first wrote to Council President Chitum in March about how Gateway Community Services used money not intended for them, an issue they say was reported by Main Wire at that time. The speaker notes that Council President Chitum has publicly aligned with a local consultant who played a large role in distributing the funds, describing this as an allegiance to someone other than constituents. They also reference Lewiston Auburn Youth Network as another nonprofit receiving mass shooting funds, and claim that until recently it claimed to be located at 210 Blake Street, inside a condemned building. According to the speaker, Chitam responded to concerns with an assurance that the organization “does very good work,” but the speaker cannot find video or photographic evidence of that work. They say Chidam declined to respond to a recent email requesting specifics about the organization’s work or details of what Chitam did when investigating it, noting that visiting the location listed on paper apparently did not occur. Gunfire data is presented: 36 confirmed instances in 2023, 36 confirmed in 2024, and 37 so far this year, with the speaker noting that these figures do not include unconfirmed sounds reported by residents. They list several agencies that apparently received portions of the mass shooting donations by writing to the committee about how their clientele had fled war and violence and were traumatized: Lewiston Auburn Youth Network, Generational newer Lewiston Auburn Youth Network mirrors, Gateway Community Services, AK Collaborative Empowered Immigrant Women Unite New Mainers Public Health Initiative, and the Somali Bantu Community Association. The speaker contends that some of these same agencies stood with the police at community forums to curb gun violence over the years, and asserts that gunfire in the streets has literally increased since they received the money. Citing the growing issue of nonprofit fraud in Maine, the speaker urges the Lewiston City Council to take action to rectify the re-victimization they say has occurred when donations were distributed to unrelated agencies that used the tragedy as a funding opportunity for personal benefit.

In this video, the speaker questions the rebuilding of the Sandy Hook School after the tragic shooting. They find it suspicious that the entire school was demolished and rebuilt for $50 million. The speaker wonders if there was something being hidden or covered up. They also question the need for high-tech security features, such as bulletproof windows, suggesting that it implies a fear of another attack. The speaker criticizes the emotional manipulation in news articles and highlights the absurdity of the situation. They conclude by urging people to question events like Sandy Hook and not blindly accept the narrative presented.