reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker asks if the Pfizer COVID vaccine was tested for its ability to stop virus transmission before being released. They request a clear yes or no answer and the data to be shared with the committee. The response states that they did not have prior knowledge of stopping transmission before the vaccine entered the market and had to rely on scientific research. Another speaker expresses outrage, claiming that people were pressured to get vaccinated based on the false belief that it would protect others.

Speaker 0 asked for the impossible: to develop a vaccine in 8 months instead of 10 years without cutting corners. They emphasized safety. Speaker 1 questioned Pfizer's transparency in mutating COVID viruses. Speaker 0 stressed the importance of vaccination for public health. Pfizer's CEO discussed vaccine production and effectiveness. They thanked the US government for support. The CEO highlighted the vaccine's 95.6% efficacy. The conversation ended with a call for public vaccination.

The speaker asked if the Pfizer COVID vaccine was tested for stopping virus transmission before it was released. They wanted a clear yes or no answer and requested the data to be shared with the committee. In response, it was stated that no, they did not have knowledge about stopping transmission before the vaccine entered the market. They had to act quickly.

The speaker claims adverse events from the vaccine rollout were covered up and dismissed as rare and coincidental. They state that regulators approved the vaccines based on relative risk data (95%), which they describe as misleading, while the absolute risk reduction was only 0.84%, meaning 120 people had to be vaccinated to prevent one infection. The speaker alleges that Pfizer has 31 convictions, including withholding data, presenting false data, and bribing clinicians and regulators. They claim over 100 doctors have written to various health organizations, including the NHS and MHRA, about the vaccine program, but received only one response. The speaker concludes that science is dead because discussion, analysis, and debate are no longer allowed, and decisions are being made without scientific basis.

Pfizer has had a terrible year, with its stock price cut in half and poor earnings. The big investors are selling millions of shares, indicating their lack of confidence. The CEO may not receive his bonus, but he still made $33 million last year. The interesting part is the connections between Pfizer's board members and other companies. One board member used to be the CEO of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, while another was the former commissioner of the FDA. There is also a new company, Resilient, founded in 2020, with two Pfizer board members, the former FDA commissioner, and the CEO of In Q Tel. This raises suspicions, especially when combined with the struggling pharmaceutical industry. The speaker is curious if anyone else has investigated this matter.

The speaker claims that Pfizer documents reveal evidence of a crime against humanity. They state that Pfizer knew the vaccines didn't work to stop COVID just one month after rollout and that the vaccines had vaccine failure and failure of efficacy. The speaker also highlights that Pfizer was receiving numerous reports of adverse events and had to hire staff to process the paperwork. They argue that the vaccines caused heart damage and other severe side effects, and that the materials in the vaccines biodistribute throughout the body, including the brain and ovaries. The speaker suggests that this is a deliberate bioweapon attack by the Chinese Communist Party and calls for justice.

The speaker claims Pfizer committed the greatest crime against humanity in recorded history due to the scale and foreknowledge of harm. She states Pfizer knew within a month of the vaccine rollout in November 2020 that it didn't work to stop COVID, referring to internal language describing "vaccine failure" and "failure of efficacy." She claims the 3rd most common side effect in the documents is COVID. According to the speaker, mandates, job losses, family separations, deaths, injuries, and sterilizations were based on a lie. The speaker asserts that society was destroyed, children's education was ruined, depression and suicide levels increased, and businesses were destroyed, all based on a lie, resulting in a massive transfer of wealth.

The speaker, who is the vice president of Pfizer and a board member, addresses someone named Josh and asks if Jordan Tristan Walker still works at Pfizer. The speaker mentions that someone was unhappy to see them. They express their happiness to see the person they are speaking to and state that the issue being discussed is one of the biggest public health concerns in US history. The speaker also questions why most of the board agreed with someone named Dan.

A year ago, the speaker requested data from Emma, including all clinical trials done by medical companies before they requested marketing authorization for the green certificate. Regarding Pfizer, the speaker notes the company submitted a clinical trial that started on January 14, 2020. The speaker questioned a Pfizer representative about how tests for the vaccine began so soon after the December 2019 emergence of COVID-19, but the representative declined to answer. The speaker also asked the CEO of Moderna how they submitted trials since 2017, years before the virus was discovered in the winter of 2019. The speaker states that the CEO of Moderna did not answer how this was possible. The speaker says these are legitimate questions that people are asking, but unfortunately, the companies are declining to answer.

Speaker 0 notes: “Have them write the information.” Speaker 1 points out that two people were sitting together: George Gao, director general of the Chinese CDC, and the deputy director of the CIA, who later became head of the entire intelligence community, at an event during the Wuhan military games two months before the Wuhan outbreak. They remark on how conveniently they were seated near each other given how closely they would coordinate two months later. In this segment, social media is mentioned 19 times. Speaker 2 comments that social media is now the primary channel for news, that interruptions to platforms could curb misinformation but also limit access to legitimate sources, and that health ministries worldwide are trying to combat misinformation and disinformation. Speaker 1 describes the tabletop exercise: the deputy director of the CIA becomes head of the ODNI as soon as Biden takes office and is dealing with social media issues. The speaker notes that George Gao attended the exercise, asking why the simulation—which was about an animal-borne coronavirus outbreak in Latin America—had the China CDC head at the table and the U.S. ODNI head present, while the outbreak was said to start in Brazil, and there were no Latin American health officials present. The president of the UPS foundation is mentioned as the only Latin-named figure. The speaker questions why the Brazil CDC director isn’t in the exercise if it’s simulating a Latin American outbreak and points to the arrangement as contradictory to the premise. Speaker 3 repeats that experts agree new disinformation campaigns are generated daily, describing the problem as huge and potentially undermining pandemic response and governance. Speaker 1 emphasizes disinformation keeping us from ending the pandemic, noting the Wuhan games are ongoing in Wuhan, and describing rumors that the US military engineered the virus and that USAID funded work, with a web of claims about public health, vaccines, and pharmaceutical company misdeeds. The speaker asserts that Pfizer, Moderna, and Gates Foundation funding are involved, including claims that Moderna patented the coronavirus vaccine before the outbreak and that Moderna is a Pentagon arm with no prior successful vaccine. Speaker 2 warns that unrest from false rumors and divisive messaging is rising and undermining response efforts as trust declines. Speaker 1 mentions the “China CDC, in charge of the Wuhan lab,” and notes that healthcare workers, if poorly trained, might give wrong information or say “I don’t know,” which erodes public trust. Speaker 0 recalls a Sierra Leone radio interview about whether Ebola was man-made, highlighting the importance of the TOT (tabletop exercise) and ensuring that nobody suspects a man-made origin. Speaker 4: Proposes steps to prevent spreading misinformation on social media by collaborating with telecommunications companies to control information access and ensuring a trusted source floods the zone with messaging, including trained influential community leaders and health workers to disseminate the desired messaging. Speaker 1 questions the idea of flooding the zone with messaging and notes the need for a rapid response to disinformation, while acknowledging that there are intelligence sources identifying foreign disinformation campaigns as part of a larger effort to address the pandemic.

Speaker 0 asks if Moderna puts any of its profits into helping people injured by the vaccine. Speaker 1 states that indemnities are a matter for the government and cannot comment further. Speaker 0 questions if Moderna is unwilling to underwrite the risk of its own vaccine and prioritize its safety. Speaker 1 reiterates that they take vaccine safety seriously and have a good pharmacovigilance process in place, but indemnities are a matter for policymakers. Speaker 0 asks about the moral responsibility of helping vaccine victims, to which Speaker 1 does not provide a direct answer. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 assuming the answer is zero.

The speaker, a quality auditor at Pfizer, shares their concerns about the company's COVID-19 vaccine. They discovered that the vaccine vials were glowing and raised the issue with corporate, but received an unsatisfactory response. They also found documents in the company's database that mentioned the use of aborted fetal cell lines in the vaccine's development and the possibility of graphene oxide being present. The speaker noticed unusual security measures and a lack of proper quality control procedures. They also stumbled upon documents referencing depopulation and Satanism. Additionally, they discovered a Pfizer research and development lab in Wuhan with the address 666. The speaker believes that Pfizer, along with other organizations like the FDA and CDC, are aware of these issues. They express their distrust in vaccines and pharmaceutical companies in general.

Pfizer has had a rough year, with its stock price dropping by more than half and poor earnings. The big investors in Pfizer are selling millions of shares, indicating their lack of confidence. The CEO may not receive his bonus, but he still made $33 million last year. The speaker discovered some interesting connections within Pfizer's board of directors, including former CEOs of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the FDA. They are also involved in a new company called Resilient, which focuses on fast-tracking medical technology. The CEO of In Q Tel, a significant company, is also on Resilient's board. The speaker finds these connections suspicious, especially considering the current state of the pharmaceutical industry. They are curious if anyone else has investigated this matter.

Pharmaceutical companies paid $1.06 billion to reviewers at major medical journals, allegedly corrupting the peer review process. Studies from the CDC, FDA, and Pfizer purportedly revealed major breaches in COVID-19 vaccine safety signals during pregnancy, but these findings were allegedly ignored. Independent researchers who published findings contradicting pharmaceutical industry narratives faced persecution, censorship, and threats to their medical licenses and board certifications. The speaker claims this happened to them personally.

A recent study suggests that Pfizer may have excluded known deaths in the vaccine arm of its clinical trial from its data filing with the FDA in 2020. The study also found that trial subjects vaccinated with Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine experienced a significant increase in cardiovascular deaths compared to placebo controls. This information was not disclosed by Pfizer when the FDA was evaluating the vaccine for emergency use. Additionally, researchers identified instances where Pfizer attributed potential vaccine-associated deaths to other causes, undermining vaccine safety data. The data presented to the FDA prior to the authorization of Pfizer's vaccine did not include all the deaths that occurred during the trial. The speaker raises concerns about the prioritization of profit over lives and warns against trusting Big Pharma.

I found it very interesting to see the CEO of Pfizer, Albert Bourla, get booed at a White House Black History Month event after being introduced by Trump. Trump even seemed to anticipate the reaction. Pharmaceutical executives have become increasingly disliked, especially after the COVID vaccine situation. Bourla's presence seems to be part of an attempt to get the administration to be lenient on Pfizer, especially with RFK Junior now the Secretary of Health and Human Services. RFK Junior, a known vaccine skeptic, aims to address pharmaceutical company abuses. Bourla even had a secret dinner with RFK Junior to discuss chronic diseases. Despite this, Bourla believes there are still opportunities for Pfizer with the new administration. However, the public's negative reaction suggests a deep distrust and anger towards Pfizer, making it difficult for them to regain public confidence. We need to keep up the pressure to ensure accountability for their actions.

During the COVID pandemic, the Australian government granted Pfizer blanket immunity, allowing them to develop and distribute COVID injections without accountability. However, Pfizer has a history of criminal acts, including bribery and suppressing adverse trial results. The manufacturing process of the injections was also questionable, with evidence of live DNA derived from e coli found in the Pfizer product. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) did not conduct thorough testing on each batch of injections, relying instead on the US FDA's word. The lack of long-term safety testing is concerning, especially considering Pfizer's record-breaking profits. The Australian taxpayers are left with an unknown liability, while those who question the injections are labeled as "anti-vaxxers." The speaker opposes the forced administration of untested experimental injections and calls for accountability.

Speaker 0: They argue that because the vaccine is classified as such, they don’t have to worry about being sued. They claim immunity from liability is dependent on there being no fraud, and there clearly was fraud. Speaker 1: They say there is fraud. They note that immunity from liability depends on fraud, and in light of that, it matters. They explain that there was fraud. Speaker 0: Expresses surprise and asks for caveats about fraud. Acknowledges there were caveats. Speaker 1: Confirms there is fraud and says it makes the situation more interesting. Speaker 0: Asks how fraud is defined, noting that drugs were sold with multiple studies and only one was good. Speaker 1: Responds with a point about safety testing for the mRNA vaccines. States that the insufficient safety testing was done before release, and that the product injected into billions of people involved DNA plasmids. There is massive contamination in the shots actually delivered, including the SV40 promoter from simian virus 40. The point is that safety testing for one drug was completed, but people were injected with something different that had other components that were not tested, which is described as fraudulent. Speaker 0: Requests an explanation of the SV40 issue for the audience. Speaker 1: Describes production techniques used to generate the product. Explains that a plasmid, a circular piece of DNA, was used to produce the product in vats, with bacteria performing the production, later coated in lipid nanoparticle. There is a requirement to purify DNA and set standards for DNA contamination, with limits that cannot be exceeded. In this case, the problem isn’t only poor quality control but that there was a more painstaking way to produce the same product that did not involve DNA plasmids at all. Consequently, leftover material in vials injected into people contained DNA contamination across the board. Kevin McKernan tested vials, finding DNA contamination in the samples. Speaker 1: Explains that the DNA left over includes the SV40 promoter, a genetic trigger from simian virus 40, which is known to be carcinogenic. Since this promoter is left in the vials from injections given to people, it challenges the claim that the mRNA shots could not integrate into the genome. While acknowledging that there are cellular processes such as reverse transcription, the speaker asserts that even the claim of “no DNA” is false because there is DNA in the vials, specifically DNA with the SV40 promoter, a genetic engineering tool with carcinogenic potential. The speaker concludes that this appears to be fraud: injecting a different product into the public on the basis of safety testing that was conducted with a product produced by a different process. Speaker 0: Reiterates the conclusion: you can’t inject a different product into the public on the basis of safety testing that was done with something produced by a different process.

Speaker 0 describes finding vaccine insert materials with no printed content and says this is disheartening and “disgusting,” then adds that it “gets better” and that “more” continues to happen. Speaker 0 claims the CDC redacted every word of a 148-page study on myocarditis after COVID vaccination, and that when they asked to have the study printed, the entire document was redacted. They question what the study could have contained that required redaction and say this is “even scarier.” Speaker 1 says they are witnessing “an active cover up” of a “colossal consumer product safety debacle” affecting the entire world. They claim that in the United States the CDC, National Institutes of Health, and FDA are actively involved, and that similar actions occur in the UK with the MHRA, in Europe with European medicine agencies, and in Australia with the Therapeutic Goods Administration. Speaker 1 states that each of these regulators requires product companies to produce ninety days of safety monitoring after a product comes out, describing this as a regulatory dossier. They say that if problems arise and are reported to a company (such as Pfizer), the company must report, compile, and produce a report that is made publicly available. Speaker 1 claims that for Pfizer, whose first vaccine was approved 12/10/2020, Pfizer did not produce a report after the ninety days. They add that when people asked what was happening, Pfizer allegedly did not disclose what occurred, leading to court proceedings. Speaker 1 states that the FDA’s lawyer allegedly said the dossier should not be released for fifty-five years, and that after pressure, the Pfizer dossier was eventually released. They then claim Pfizer recorded 1,223 deaths with their product within ninety days of release and recorded over 1,200 new adverse events. Speaker 1 also says the FDA worked to cover this up, and that FDA should have regulated Pfizer with at least monthly meetings and full disclosure about “novel vaccines,” which they describe as a “genetic transfer technology platform,” the first time human beings had been injected with foreign genetic material in world history. Speaker 1 ends by stating that two thirds of the world’s population took these.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about a report stating that serious adverse reactions occur in 1 in 800 vaccinated individuals. Speaker 1 claims to be unaware of the report but mentions routine screening of literature for adverse events. When asked about Moderna's rate of serious adverse events, Speaker 1 cannot provide the information. Speaker 0 expresses frustration and finds it extraordinary that a multinational company cannot provide this data. Speaker 1 offers to provide the information later but states that no safety concerns were observed in their clinical trials. Speaker 0 concludes that the conversation is a waste of time.

Pfizer is being sued for defrauding the government, but they claim they did not commit fraud. They argue they provided what the government requested, even if it was a faulty product distributed worldwide. This information is crucial and not widely known.

A year ago, the speaker requested data from Emma, including clinical trials from medical companies before they sought marketing authorization for their products. Regarding Pfizer, the speaker notes that the company submitted a clinical trial that started on January 14, 2020. The speaker questioned a Pfizer representative about how Pfizer started testing a vaccine in January 2020, just days after the Chinese government released DNA data about the virus in December 2019, but the representative declined to answer. The speaker also mentions that Moderna submitted trials dating back to 2017. The speaker asked the CEO of Moderna how it was possible to submit vaccine tests years before the virus was discovered in December 2019. The speaker states that these are legitimate questions that people are asking, but unfortunately, the companies are declining to answer.

The speaker questions the source of the claim that 20 million lives have been saved. They ask for data and studies to support this number. The response is indirect and the meeting is about to end when the speaker jumps back in to clarify that the 20 million lives saved refers to all vaccines, not just mRNA vaccines. The speaker is unable to ask for further clarification. They find it suspicious that this number is being thrown around without proper explanation. They suggest that these numbers are made up.

Speaker 0 says they found “information like this,” such as vaccine insert paper, with “nothing printed on it,” which they call disheartening and disgusting. They add that it “just keeps happening” and claim the CDC redacts “every single word” of a 148-page study on a myocarditis after COVID vaccination. Speaker 0 says they asked someone to print the study, and that the entire 148 pages are redacted. They ask what a study does if “there’s nothing there,” and they ask what might have been there that required redaction. Speaker 1 says they are “witnessing an active cover up” involving “a colossal consumer product safety debacle” affecting the entire world. They claim that in the United States, the CDC, National Institutes of Health, and FDA are actively involved in a cover up, and that similar cover ups are occurring in the UK with the MHRA, in Europe with European medicine agencies, and in Australia with the Therapeutic Goods Administration. Speaker 1 states that each company that puts out a product has an obligation to produce “ninety days of safety monitoring” after the product comes out, describing it as a regulatory dossier. They claim that if someone has a problem and reports it to a company like Pfizer, Pfizer must report, write down what happened, collate it into a report, and make it publicly available. Speaker 1 says that when the ninety days elapsed for Pfizer’s first vaccine approved on 12/10/2020, Pfizer “didn’t produce a report.” They add that people asked what was happening with the vaccine, and Pfizer allegedly would not disclose what happened, leading to a court case. Speaker 1 says the lawyer for the FDA stepped in to say they did not want to release Pfizer’s dossier for fifty-five years. Speaker 1 then says that after the plaintiff pushed, the Pfizer dossier “slowly” came out. They claim Pfizer recorded one thousand two hundred and twenty-three deaths with their product within ninety days of release, and they say people called Pfizer in desperation watching family members die after taking the vaccine. Speaker 1 also claims Pfizer recorded “over twelve hundred” new adverse events and refers to “doctor Boden” discussing problems they say they have been grappling with. They conclude by claiming the FDA worked to cover this up and should have been regulating the company with at least monthly meetings and full disclosure about novel vaccines, described by Speaker 1 as a genetic transfer technology platform and as the first time human beings were injected with foreign genetic material in world history, after which “they were getting it full on.” Speaker 1 ends by saying “Two thirds of the world’s population took”

The speaker believes COVID vaccine programs should be stopped. They are astounded by the number of papers critical of the vaccine or showing negative effects. The speaker claims a group of researchers funded by Pfizer and the NIH bullies editors to retract papers with negative findings about the vaccine. They assert the number of retractions is appalling. According to the speaker, in one instance where an editor resisted, Nature Springer bought the journal and retracted the paper. The speaker states that this is what they have been dealing with.