TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker asks if the Pfizer COVID vaccine was tested for its ability to stop virus transmission before being released. They request a clear yes or no answer and the data to be shared with the committee. The response states that they did not have prior knowledge of stopping transmission before the vaccine entered the market and had to rely on scientific research. Another speaker expresses outrage, claiming that people were pressured to get vaccinated based on the false belief that it would protect others.

Speaker 0 asked for the impossible: to develop a vaccine in 8 months instead of 10 years without cutting corners. They emphasized safety. Speaker 1 questioned Pfizer's transparency in mutating COVID viruses. Speaker 0 stressed the importance of vaccination for public health. Pfizer's CEO discussed vaccine production and effectiveness. They thanked the US government for support. The CEO highlighted the vaccine's 95.6% efficacy. The conversation ended with a call for public vaccination.

Former vice president of Pfizer, Speaker 1, shares his insights on the events of early 2020. He noticed inconsistencies in statements made by colleagues and realized something was amiss. The simultaneous lockdowns across multiple countries convinced him that this was a coordinated effort beyond the local level. Speaker 1 accuses those in power of lying and implementing ineffective measures. He believes that the vaccines being administered are intentionally harmful, based on his extensive experience in drug design. He is unafraid of legal action and challenges them to sue him, confident that he would win.

The speaker asked if the Pfizer COVID vaccine was tested for stopping virus transmission before it was released. They wanted a clear yes or no answer and requested the data to be shared with the committee. In response, it was stated that no, they did not have knowledge about stopping transmission before the vaccine entered the market. They had to act quickly.

The speaker claims adverse events from the vaccine rollout were covered up and dismissed as rare and coincidental. They state that regulators approved the vaccines based on relative risk data (95%), which they describe as misleading, while the absolute risk reduction was only 0.84%, meaning 120 people had to be vaccinated to prevent one infection. The speaker alleges that Pfizer has 31 convictions, including withholding data, presenting false data, and bribing clinicians and regulators. They claim over 100 doctors have written to various health organizations, including the NHS and MHRA, about the vaccine program, but received only one response. The speaker concludes that science is dead because discussion, analysis, and debate are no longer allowed, and decisions are being made without scientific basis.

Pfizer has had a terrible year, with its stock price cut in half and poor earnings. The big investors are selling millions of shares, indicating their lack of confidence. The CEO may not receive his bonus, but he still made $33 million last year. The interesting part is the connections between Pfizer's board members and other companies. One board member used to be the CEO of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, while another was the former commissioner of the FDA. There is also a new company, Resilient, founded in 2020, with two Pfizer board members, the former FDA commissioner, and the CEO of In Q Tel. This raises suspicions, especially when combined with the struggling pharmaceutical industry. The speaker is curious if anyone else has investigated this matter.

The interviewer confronts Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, about the vaccines' failure to stop transmission and accuses him of keeping it a secret. They demand an apology and refunds for countries that invested in the ineffective vaccine. The interviewer questions Bourla's wealth and asks about potential criminal charges and investigations. They also mention Pfizer's history of deceptive marketing and express concern about media censorship. The interviewer urges viewers to visit wefreports.com for uncensored coverage and to support their crowdfunded journalism. They conclude by emphasizing the importance of holding pharmaceutical companies accountable.

The speaker claims that Pfizer documents reveal evidence of a crime against humanity. They state that Pfizer knew the vaccines didn't work to stop COVID just one month after rollout and that the vaccines had vaccine failure and failure of efficacy. The speaker also highlights that Pfizer was receiving numerous reports of adverse events and had to hire staff to process the paperwork. They argue that the vaccines caused heart damage and other severe side effects, and that the materials in the vaccines biodistribute throughout the body, including the brain and ovaries. The speaker suggests that this is a deliberate bioweapon attack by the Chinese Communist Party and calls for justice.

The speaker claims Pfizer committed the greatest crime against humanity in recorded history due to the scale and foreknowledge of harm. She states Pfizer knew within a month of the vaccine rollout in November 2020 that it didn't work to stop COVID, referring to internal language describing "vaccine failure" and "failure of efficacy." She claims the 3rd most common side effect in the documents is COVID. According to the speaker, mandates, job losses, family separations, deaths, injuries, and sterilizations were based on a lie. The speaker asserts that society was destroyed, children's education was ruined, depression and suicide levels increased, and businesses were destroyed, all based on a lie, resulting in a massive transfer of wealth.

The speaker, who is the vice president of Pfizer and a board member, addresses someone named Josh and asks if Jordan Tristan Walker still works at Pfizer. The speaker mentions that someone was unhappy to see them. They express their happiness to see the person they are speaking to and state that the issue being discussed is one of the biggest public health concerns in US history. The speaker also questions why most of the board agreed with someone named Dan.

A year ago, the speaker requested data from Emma, including all clinical trials done by medical companies before they requested marketing authorization for the green certificate. Regarding Pfizer, the speaker notes the company submitted a clinical trial that started on January 14, 2020. The speaker questioned a Pfizer representative about how tests for the vaccine began so soon after the December 2019 emergence of COVID-19, but the representative declined to answer. The speaker also asked the CEO of Moderna how they submitted trials since 2017, years before the virus was discovered in the winter of 2019. The speaker states that the CEO of Moderna did not answer how this was possible. The speaker says these are legitimate questions that people are asking, but unfortunately, the companies are declining to answer.

Speaker 0 asks if Moderna puts any of its profits into helping people injured by the vaccine. Speaker 1 states that indemnities are a matter for the government and cannot comment further. Speaker 0 questions if Moderna is unwilling to underwrite the risk of its own vaccine and prioritize its safety. Speaker 1 reiterates that they take vaccine safety seriously and have a good pharmacovigilance process in place, but indemnities are a matter for policymakers. Speaker 0 asks about the moral responsibility of helping vaccine victims, to which Speaker 1 does not provide a direct answer. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 assuming the answer is zero.

The speaker, a quality auditor at Pfizer, shares their concerns about the company's COVID-19 vaccine. They discovered that the vaccine vials were glowing and raised the issue with corporate, but received an unsatisfactory response. They also found documents in the company's database that mentioned the use of aborted fetal cell lines in the vaccine's development and the possibility of graphene oxide being present. The speaker noticed unusual security measures and a lack of proper quality control procedures. They also stumbled upon documents referencing depopulation and Satanism. Additionally, they discovered a Pfizer research and development lab in Wuhan with the address 666. The speaker believes that Pfizer, along with other organizations like the FDA and CDC, are aware of these issues. They express their distrust in vaccines and pharmaceutical companies in general.

Pfizer has had a rough year, with its stock price dropping by more than half and poor earnings. The big investors in Pfizer are selling millions of shares, indicating their lack of confidence. The CEO may not receive his bonus, but he still made $33 million last year. The speaker discovered some interesting connections within Pfizer's board of directors, including former CEOs of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the FDA. They are also involved in a new company called Resilient, which focuses on fast-tracking medical technology. The CEO of In Q Tel, a significant company, is also on Resilient's board. The speaker finds these connections suspicious, especially considering the current state of the pharmaceutical industry. They are curious if anyone else has investigated this matter.

Pharmaceutical companies paid $1.06 billion to reviewers at major medical journals, allegedly corrupting the peer review process. Studies from the CDC, FDA, and Pfizer purportedly revealed major breaches in COVID-19 vaccine safety signals during pregnancy, but these findings were allegedly ignored. Independent researchers who published findings contradicting pharmaceutical industry narratives faced persecution, censorship, and threats to their medical licenses and board certifications. The speaker claims this happened to them personally.

A recent study suggests that Pfizer may have excluded known deaths in the vaccine arm of its clinical trial from its data filing with the FDA in 2020. The study also found that trial subjects vaccinated with Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine experienced a significant increase in cardiovascular deaths compared to placebo controls. This information was not disclosed by Pfizer when the FDA was evaluating the vaccine for emergency use. Additionally, researchers identified instances where Pfizer attributed potential vaccine-associated deaths to other causes, undermining vaccine safety data. The data presented to the FDA prior to the authorization of Pfizer's vaccine did not include all the deaths that occurred during the trial. The speaker raises concerns about the prioritization of profit over lives and warns against trusting Big Pharma.

I found it very interesting to see the CEO of Pfizer, Albert Bourla, get booed at a White House Black History Month event after being introduced by Trump. Trump even seemed to anticipate the reaction. Pharmaceutical executives have become increasingly disliked, especially after the COVID vaccine situation. Bourla's presence seems to be part of an attempt to get the administration to be lenient on Pfizer, especially with RFK Junior now the Secretary of Health and Human Services. RFK Junior, a known vaccine skeptic, aims to address pharmaceutical company abuses. Bourla even had a secret dinner with RFK Junior to discuss chronic diseases. Despite this, Bourla believes there are still opportunities for Pfizer with the new administration. However, the public's negative reaction suggests a deep distrust and anger towards Pfizer, making it difficult for them to regain public confidence. We need to keep up the pressure to ensure accountability for their actions.

During the COVID pandemic, the Australian government granted Pfizer blanket immunity, allowing them to develop and distribute COVID injections without accountability. However, Pfizer has a history of criminal acts, including bribery and suppressing adverse trial results. The manufacturing process of the injections was also questionable, with evidence of live DNA derived from e coli found in the Pfizer product. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) did not conduct thorough testing on each batch of injections, relying instead on the US FDA's word. The lack of long-term safety testing is concerning, especially considering Pfizer's record-breaking profits. The Australian taxpayers are left with an unknown liability, while those who question the injections are labeled as "anti-vaxxers." The speaker opposes the forced administration of untested experimental injections and calls for accountability.

The speaker claims Pfizer committed the greatest crime against humanity in recorded history due to the scale and foreknowledge of harm. They state Pfizer knew within three months of rollout that 1,225 people had died. The speaker alleges that by April 2021, Pfizer knew the injections were damaging minors' hearts, citing warnings from the Israeli health ministry and a pediatric group. Instead of informing the public, the speaker claims Pfizer held a "freak out conference" to plan how to lie to the American people, creating a 17-page script. This was allegedly followed by a summer-long propaganda campaign using influencers and TikTok personalities to promote injections among young people and teenagers.

Speaker 1 reveals that Bear Corporation knowingly sold medication infected with the AIDS virus. They pulled the product from the US market and dumped it in France, Europe, Asia, and Latin America to make a profit. Shockingly, no corporate executives have been indicted or investigated by the US Justice Department. The FDA allowed this to happen, resulting in the deaths of thousands of innocent hemophiliacs and their family members. The government is turning a blind eye to the situation.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about a report stating that serious adverse reactions occur in 1 in 800 vaccinated individuals. Speaker 1 claims to be unaware of the report but mentions routine screening of literature for adverse events. When asked about Moderna's rate of serious adverse events, Speaker 1 cannot provide the information. Speaker 0 expresses frustration and finds it extraordinary that a multinational company cannot provide this data. Speaker 1 offers to provide the information later but states that no safety concerns were observed in their clinical trials. Speaker 0 concludes that the conversation is a waste of time.

Pfizer is being sued for defrauding the government, but they claim they did not commit fraud. They argue they provided what the government requested, even if it was a faulty product distributed worldwide. This information is crucial and not widely known.

A year ago, the speaker requested data from Emma, including clinical trials from medical companies before they sought marketing authorization for their products. Regarding Pfizer, the speaker notes that the company submitted a clinical trial that started on January 14, 2020. The speaker questioned a Pfizer representative about how Pfizer started testing a vaccine in January 2020, just days after the Chinese government released DNA data about the virus in December 2019, but the representative declined to answer. The speaker also mentions that Moderna submitted trials dating back to 2017. The speaker asked the CEO of Moderna how it was possible to submit vaccine tests years before the virus was discovered in December 2019. The speaker states that these are legitimate questions that people are asking, but unfortunately, the companies are declining to answer.

The speaker questions the source of the claim that 20 million lives have been saved. They ask for data and studies to support this number. The response is indirect and the meeting is about to end when the speaker jumps back in to clarify that the 20 million lives saved refers to all vaccines, not just mRNA vaccines. The speaker is unable to ask for further clarification. They find it suspicious that this number is being thrown around without proper explanation. They suggest that these numbers are made up.

The speaker believes COVID vaccine programs should be stopped. They are astounded by the number of papers critical of the vaccine or showing negative effects. The speaker claims a group of researchers funded by Pfizer and the NIH bullies editors to retract papers with negative findings about the vaccine. They assert the number of retractions is appalling. According to the speaker, in one instance where an editor resisted, Nature Springer bought the journal and retracted the paper. The speaker states that this is what they have been dealing with.