TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker expresses concern about Americans being afraid of being prosecuted by the Department of Justice. They mention the events of January 6th and how some Americans came to the Capitol out of frustration with the government. They criticize the lack of proper security and mention the fear people have of the FBI. The speaker questions the Department's handling of investigations, particularly regarding the Durham report and the slow progress on certain cases. They also raise concerns about corruption and the need for only eligible citizens to vote in elections.

"100% proof that Ashley Babbitt was not shot." Before that, I wanna give credit to where credit is due. I wanna thank Jesus Christ, the lord and savior. It was his spirit, his spirit of truth that revealed to my heart that something was off. So I spent a lot of time analyzing the videos and check this out. So this is John Sullivan's footage and we're gonna see the gun. Of course, it's gonna make that quick movement, but also look at where it's shooting. It's shooting really low in comparison to Ashley Babbitt's neck. But then look in the upper right hand corner, and you're gonna see something move. You see that? See, we get the rare opportunity of seeing the travel of the bullet. So let's go back to this scene. This is a video clip from main mainstream media. We see Helmet Boy bashing the windows. He's gonna head over to the final window and the one that must have been installed with thumbtacks because he knocks it out in one shot. Oh, boy. But look at the wooden window trim. This is what's gonna get hit by the pathway of the bullet. Watch this. Did you see that? We got a clear shot of which way the bullet actually went after it left the gun. You may be thinking, well, it hit the window trim and then it hit Ashley Babbitt. That could happen if the shooter was shooting from in front of Ashley, but the shooter is shooting from the side of Ashley. So what we got is actually a really clear shot that Ashley Babbitt did not get shot by that bullet.

The speaker asserts a 100% proof that Ashley Babbitt was not shot and begins by giving credit to Jesus Christ, stating that “his spirit, his spirit of truth that revealed to my heart that something was off.” They claim to have spent a lot of time analyzing the videos. The speaker references John Sullivan’s footage and claims that “the gun” makes a quick movement, and that it is shooting “really low in comparison to Ashley Babbitt's neck.” They point to the upper right-hand corner of the frame, asserting that “you’ll see something move,” and claim that “we get the rare opportunity of seeing the travel of the bullet.” Returning to a scene from mainstream media, the speaker describes Helmet Boy bashing the windows and moving toward the final window—“the one that must have been installed with thumbtacks because he knocks it out in one shot.” They observe the wooden window trim and propose that it will be hit by the pathway of the bullet, asking the audience to watch and stating, “Did you see that?” The speaker claims to have obtained “a clear shot of which way the bullet actually went after it left the gun.” They state that viewers might think the bullet hit the window trim and then Ashley Babbitt, which they argue could happen if the shooter were in front of Ashley, but claim instead that “the shooter is shooting from the side of Ashley.” Consequently, they declare that what they have shown provides “a really clear shot that Ashley Babbitt did not get shot by that bullet.”

The speaker, a retired Green Beret and sniper, believes the shooting of President Trump was a planned attack due to security measures in place. He questions how a 20-year-old could access the president with a rifle without inside help. Urging focus on those who allowed the incident, he offers to protect the president for free.

The speaker conducted a bipartisan investigation into security failures during a shooting incident. They found that law enforcement lacked coordination and communication, leading to missed opportunities to prevent the attack. Suspicious actions by federal agents and questions about the number of shooters raised concerns. The speaker emphasized the need for an independent investigation to uncover the truth behind the incident.

Two years ago, Capitol Hill Police Officer Michael Bird shot and killed unarmed Ashley Babbitt. Bird had a prior record of firearm negligence, including leaving a loaded pistol in a public restroom. Babbitt was a 14-year military veteran and ran a pool cleaning business. Bird admitted Babbitt was unarmed and posed no visible threat. Instead of facing charges, Bird was declared a national hero by Nancy Pelosi's congressional police force and the media. He appeared on television and complained about racism. He was never punished for Babbitt's death but instead was rewarded. Babbitt's mother was arrested by Capitol Police for attempting to hold a memorial service for her daughter. The speaker claims that Ashley Babbitt's death is the most significant, yet least discussed, event of January 6th.

Representative Markwayne Mullin recounted a conversation with the police officer who fatally shot a woman at the Capitol on January 6th. Mullin stated he doesn't know for a fact, but he guarantees the officer had never used his weapon in that manner before and didn't want to. Mullin said the officer was physically and emotionally distraught after the event, and Mullin told him he did what he had to do. Mullin stated the officer's life has also changed because using lethal force for the first time never leaves you. He added the officer was doing his job because members were still in the balcony, and if someone presents a weapon and gives commands that are ignored, there is no choice but to discharge the weapon in self-defense or risk it being used against you and endangering others.

The speaker, a retired Green Beret and sniper, believes the shooting of President Trump was a planned attack due to security measures in place. He questions how a 20-year-old could have accessed the area and fired shots without inside help. The speaker offers to protect the president for free if needed.

We thank you for your service in protecting our country. However, there are questions about what exactly was being protected. Security footage shows that individuals were allowed to enter without resistance, without weapons, almost like a guided tour. It's important to note that the only casualty was Ashley Babbit, who was shot by Capitol Police. So, it raises the question of what exactly was saved that day. The speaker mentions having written a book before going to break.

The speaker discusses the dishonesty surrounding the death of Brian Sicknick, a police officer. They criticize those who falsely claimed he was murdered by the mob for political gain. The speaker expresses disgust at the exploitation and lies perpetrated by certain individuals and the media. They highlight the press's resistance to releasing information and their commitment to the government's narrative. The speaker also questions the labeling of the Capitol rioters as "armed insurrectionists" when there is no evidence of them using weapons. They conclude by noting the perversion of journalism into a government-supporting entity.

Judicial Watch presents a cell phone video showing police officers placed at harm by lieutenant Byrd's reckless decision to shoot Ashley Babich, illustrating that civilians and other law enforcement personnel were in the line of fire. They claim Byrd's shooting was treated differently than other police officer shootings, and argue that if it weren't a Trump supporter, if it weren't January 6, if Capitol Hill Police, then I'm convinced lieutenant Byrd, in the least, would have faced a more serious criminal investigation. The release includes photos of Byrd's headshot, hands, and the gun, and notes it is unclear whether a criminal prosecution was recommended and rejected. An audio interview with Byrd includes Garrity warnings; Byrd says, "I would prefer to have a lawyer." Judicial Watch also notes it sued the DoJ for prosecutorial decision information and Congress for 14,000 hours of video; Pelosi is the enemy of transparency.

"01/06/2021, Washington DC. The real story of the last moments of Ashley Babbitt's life, a true American hero. Justice for Ashley is justice for all." "Ashley Babbitt enlisted at age 17 and spent fourteen years in the United States Air Force and National Guard, including as a military police officer MP." "Part of her service was with the District of Columbia National Guard, which is responsible for the defense of the nation's capital." "Zachary Alom pushes Ashley aside and further incites the protesters." "Zachary Alom bashes out the last piece of glass leading to the speaker's lobby." "With her right hand, Ashley Babbitt pulls Zachary Alom by his backpack away from the windows, and with her left hand, punches him in the face." "Everything they told you was a lie." "Ashley Babbitt was a hero."

Speaker 0 expresses concern about the administration’s response to the incident, noting that very quickly, very high up people, including Christine Ohm, Donald Trump himself, and Shady Vance, started calling the killed woman a domestic terrorist and saying she deserved it. The speaker argues that when a relatively young mother of three is killed by a law enforcement officer, government officials should say this was a tragedy, that they will conduct an investigation, and they will see what happened, instead of “running cover for the officer,” because such conduct erodes public trust. The speaker emphasizes that many things about the response freaked people out and describes it as disturbing to have people calling the woman a domestic terrorist. The question is raised: “What the fuck does that even mean?” The speaker notes that even if she did try to run the officer over, it’s not terrorism, and questions what people are talking about when they use that label. There is a critique of how words like “terrorist” are used loosely and how they have “lost meaning,” with the speaker asserting that this is the kind of rhetoric that is used to paint people in certain ways. The speaker draws a comparison, suggesting that labeling someone a terrorist resembles tactics used against Palestinians, where everyone is painted as a terrorist. The rapid labeling is described as part of a broader pattern of invoking terrorism to justify actions or narratives. The speaker concludes with a conditional reflection: if someone is a terrorist, then “actually anything goes,” signaling a perception that the label is being used to bypass normal standards or accountability.

Aaron, the husband of Ashley Babbitt, who was shot and killed during the Capitol riot, speaks out about her character and the wrongful death lawsuit filed against the federal government. He describes Ashley as a patriotic, non-violent person who wanted to see President Trump speak. Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch discusses the lawsuit, stating that Ashley's shooting was unjust and that there is evidence yet to be released. Aaron cannot speak to Ashley's intentions for entering the Capitol but emphasizes that she was peacefully present with others. The interview concludes with prayers for Ashley and gratitude for joining the discussion.

The video discusses the unveiling of Lieutenant Michael Byrd as the Capitol Hill police officer who shot Ashley Babbitt. Aaron Babbitt shares his thoughts on Byrd's interview, questioning his actions and motives. Byrd claims he shot Babbitt in self-defense to protect others. The interview raises concerns about transparency and racial factors in the case. Aaron Babbitt plans to file a lawsuit against the Capitol Police. Viewers are directed to a website to support the legal fight for justice for Ashley.

Ashley Babbitt's family plans to file a multimillion dollar wrongful death lawsuit against the Capitol Police Department. They believe the officer who shot Babbitt had no right to use his weapon. According to their lawyer, Babbitt was unarmed and couldn't see the officer due to furniture blocking her view. The officer allegedly didn't give a verbal warning before firing. Babbitt's family argues that while her actions may have been unlawful, they didn't warrant her death. Witnesses express shock and anger at the officer's actions, calling Babbitt's shooting unjustified. They believe she should be seen as a hero for standing up against the government.

The speaker urges stopping the use of the word "assassination," arguing that from a death investigator’s/forensics perspective, this is a murder investigation and a homicide. They state, "You politicize it when you say assassination."

The speaker poses questions regarding the shooting of Ashley Babbitt. They ask if the officer knew Babbitt was unarmed, and if not, what led them to believe she was armed. The speaker questions whether the officer verbally ordered Babbitt to stop using commands like "freeze," "halt," "go back," or "stop." Referencing police guidelines, the speaker asks what imminent deadly threat Babbitt posed, especially since she was unarmed and not within reach of an officer or member of Congress. The speaker inquires if the officer was aware of John Sullivan recording the shooting. Finally, the speaker asks about the officer's political views of President Trump and Trump supporters, and whether negative views influenced the decision to shoot. The speaker believes these questions deserve answers.

The speaker was told that the DOJ is still opposing the Babbitt family's wrongful death lawsuit. The speaker responded that they are a "big fan of Ashley Babbitt," who they believe was a "really good person" and a "big MAGA fan" who was "innocently standing there" and that it was a "disgrace" that "a man did something to her that was unthinkable when he shot her." The speaker will look into the case. The speaker was told that the officer who shot Babbitt, Michael Bird, is still on duty and was given a raise and a medal. The speaker believes he may have also received a promotion and that it is a "disgrace." The speaker will look into Bird's reputation. The speaker claims that the people at the January 6th riot "had no guns," and that "there was something to do with the FBI" and "Antifa." The speaker believes that this group of people has been treated more harshly than any other group, with few exceptions. The speaker pardoned people involved in the riot, and believes that "this whole movement that we have is just a it's a very inspiring thing what's happened to our country."

It's been over six months since January 6, and we still don't know who shot Ashley Babbitt. There's growing frustration over the lack of transparency from the government regarding this incident and the events of that day. Key questions remain unanswered, such as the identity of the officer involved and why Capitol Police allowed protesters inside. Jacob Chansley, known as the "QAnon Shaman," has been held in solitary confinement despite not committing a violent crime. There are concerns about the treatment of peaceful protesters and the lack of accountability for law enforcement actions. The discussion raises issues about political prisoners and the need for Republican leaders to address these concerns.

On January 6th, I was in the House chamber when Ashley Babbitt was shot and killed by Lieutenant Byrd. She was seen as a threat, but it's unclear what her intentions were. Byrd yelled for her to stop, but she didn't listen. If this had happened during the 2020 riots, Byrd would have been indicted quickly. The events of January 6th were driven by lies.

The speaker questions why the FBI didn't inform cabinet secretaries about potential threats on January 6th. They criticize the lack of security measures at the Capitol and mention offering National Guard support, which was declined. They believe better information sharing could have prevented the events. The speaker emphasizes that protecting the Capitol is a law enforcement responsibility, not a military one, and suggests cooperation between agencies. They imply political reasons for the lack of action.

Two years ago, Capitol Hill police officer Michael Byrd shot and killed an unarmed woman named Ashley Babbitt. Byrd had a history of negligence with firearms, including leaving a loaded pistol in a public restroom. Despite this, he remained on the force. Babbitt, a 14-year military veteran, was unarmed and posed no physical threat. Byrd admitted he had no indication she was carrying a weapon. Instead of facing consequences, Byrd was hailed as a hero and complained about racism. Babbitt's mother, on the other hand, was arrested for trying to hold a memorial service for her daughter. Ashley Babbitt's death is the most significant but least discussed event of January 6th at the US Capitol.

I'm here with Ashley Davitt's mother who believes that the black police officer actor and Ashley Bobbitt should be featured on the show. They question whether the bullet that hit Ashley Bobbitt was actually fired by the black police officer actor. They also point out that the police officers present did not make any effort to save her life after she was shot. They criticize the lack of reaction from bystanders and express their disbelief that people continued to film the incident. They plan to call out this situation and support stophate.com. Ashley's mother asserts that her daughter was exercising her first amendment rights and was unjustly shot by capital police lieutenant Michael Hurd without consequences.

The speaker, a retired Green Beret and sniper, believes the shooting of President Trump was a planned attack due to security measures in place. He questions how a 20-year-old could access the president with a rifle without inside help. Urging focus on those who allowed the incident, he offers to protect the president for free if needed.