TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker, who has been on the farm for three and a half months, aims to connect Canadian and South African farmers to discuss how South Africa avoided culling ostriches despite similar policies and past outbreaks. South Africa now exempts ostriches from culling, unlike Canada, where they're treated as poultry. The speaker believes culling all ostriches won't stop avian flu in chickens and is present to protect the birds. The speaker claims the RCMP are monitoring the farm, and they fear the Canadian Security establishment wants to remove the camp and media coverage to avoid scrutiny of the CFIA's stamping out policy. They state the birds haven't been tested, so there's no proof of infection. The speaker mentions Robert Kennedy has voiced his opposition to the culling. Transporting the birds to the US might offer protection, but the Canadian government and CFIA would likely oppose it. The speaker questions why the CFIA can move supposedly contaminated culled birds to a municipal dump, but not allow testing to prove infection. The speaker asserts the farmer would voluntarily cull infected birds.

Karen at the Ostrich Farm says that CFIA has approved the killing of their ostriches in one to four days. These birds are their pets, and they have spent years petting and walking amongst them. The ostriches are happy and healthy. She is asking for help to save these animals. She pleads for people to come to the farm at 301 Landfill Road to surround it and prevent the killing of the ostriches. Jump is supposed to be ready for the bodies. She believes that if people come together, they can make a change and stop this from happening.

Stretch, which is 04:30 in the morning, and they have cut the power to our side of the ostrich, pens. We have been now disconnected from power. This is absolutely psychological warfare, terrorism at its biggest on a family that has just been dedicated to doing everything good to protect Canadian farmers. And do it the right way. We've done it in peace, and love, and solidarity, and going through our proper legal channels. Remember, we have a leave into the supreme court with an emergency stay order impending, and they're still doing this with reconsideration material that they will not acknowledge with our expert witness reports. Just, anyway, a heads up that, yes. So they have now dropped our power as of 04:30 this morning on the side of all the ostriches. Send lots of prayers. We love you very much.

Drea asks if the supporter-vet will come tomorrow to check the injured hen. "It's not quite like that. The veterinarian that's here is retired, and she's let her license lapse." The hen is described as "dehydrated and in very weak condition" and "hasn't drank for two or three days." Drea is allowed to view, not treat. "No. Just me." "It's so ridiculous." An electrolyte is given: "it's just an electrolyte that she needs." They say, "I'm not a registered vet." The speaker is "very concerned that this vet knows nothing about ostrich." They accuse media and CFIA of withholding "what's actually wrong" to shape public perception: "What they're putting out there is that we have a sick hen. We don't have a sick hen. We have an injured hen because of the helicopters and the drones flying around." "She's an injured man, not a say can I"

Out of Vernon, they’re bringing the hay. Ideal Lease is carrying the hay. They probably don't know what they're being used for. Katie and the family wanna stay with their animals so they're fed how they're supposed to be fed, as Karen explained yesterday, there’s protocols to be the animals are used to a certain type of feeding style. Jeff over here was calling Ideal Lease and telling him, calling Supersave. Supersave trucks right now have tape on the number and what their and the company name, and the guy is wearing a SuperSave shirt. "SuperSave's the fencing. They would be the disposal bins." Supersave is masking their identity so that people don't know what they're doing. Track down Supersave in the North Okanagan. They wanna take a contract, and they're trying to hide who they are, super safe, and ideal lease. They're carrying the hay to help the CFIA feed the animals because Katie and Karen and Dave are gonna be removed. Jeff was phoning Supersave letting them know what they were doing.

Officers line up as tensions rise between police and supporters outside. The crowd speaks about animal welfare and political fault lines, while referencing CFIA and local decisions. The transcript preserves key lines: "Not to say the birds don't matter. 400 lives of beautiful animals that are no reason to die. Infected with the flu four years ago." "You can step out of this right now. You can just step out. What is it? A job and a paycheck? What's that for your life and your heart and your soul?" "They're a private organization. What private organization deserves this kind of protection? We killed them all." Another speaker questions leadership and accountability: "You think our prime minister not returning call[s] when they wanna talk about these guys?" The exchange ends with calls for action and a claim of impending firings.

There's been people asking about the eggs. So the family has no idea. So these birds probably are laying eggs. What are what is the CFIA doing with the eggs? And unfortunately, the family does not know. They got no way to track this stuff. These guys come in here and and just take over the place. Don't let anybody know what they're doing. They put up all these walls of secrecy to ensure that nobody can see what's going on, and then they wonder why everybody's freaking out. It'd be easy enough for the CFIA to make a statement. It'd be easy enough for the police to make a statement. It'd be easy enough for anybody that knows anything about this to make a statement, but they wanna keep all the public in the in the dark.

The Supreme Court has delayed a planned execution of nearly 400 ostriches in British Columbia after an avian flu outbreak. In a briefing about the case, ostrich farmer Elwood Coburn discussed the situation and his birds, including Bessie. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency says the ostriches need to be destroyed, and they allege that Coburn hasn’t been taking good care of the birds. Coburn responded, “How dare they? What’s this country coming to if a man can’t keep to himself and raise 400 ostriches?” He added that he wouldn’t stand by with his head in the sand to see if IA has these birds worried sick, referencing the agency’s concerns. He also noted Thanksgiving was recently and claimed the ostriches were upset, barely touching their turkey. The discussion touched on national attention, with some famous American politicians getting involved. Robert Kennedy Jr. has asked for the birds to be studied, not killed. Dr. Oz offered to re home the birds on his Florida ranch. The exchange included light remarks about Florida and the politicians’ interventions, but the central issue remained the government’s plan to destroy the birds. The court order states that since the outbreak began, some 70 ostriches have died, and didn’t another ostrich die just last week? Coburn asserted that there are 399 healthy ostriches remaining, saying, “we still have three ninety nine healthy ostriches.” He elaborated, “That’s three ninety eight birds who have nothing wrong with them. There’s three ninety seven birds with a right to live.” He warned that if the government has their way, there won’t be three ninety six birds left. He insisted, “They wanna kill all 395 birds while I plan to save all 394 of them.” The scene conveyed Coburn’s determination to protect as many birds as possible amid the outbreak and the regulatory pressure to cull the flock. In summary, the case centers on a delayed execution of hundreds of ostriches due to avian flu, with the CFIA advocating destruction and Coburn arguing for the preservation of the majority of his flock. Political figures have weighed in on whether the birds should be studied or rehomed, while the outbreak has already claimed some birds, prompting a contentious debate over the fate of the rest.

"The world is watching, and this is one of the babies. Who is it? Carrie. I got Carrie here. I mean, they have an obligation in a civil society." "Right? We don't suffer. It's in humane once again. Absolutely." "And the reason for her injury is because of the drones flying around and distressing the noise." "Injured before the drones. She was injured during those two helicopters, broke all the rules, flying over here in the dark with articulated searchlights. That's when they started running." "They went through the fences. Not the fence." "We don't even know if any of them got out that day." "What was her signs of dehydration? Very dehydrated. Skin tender. While she's drinking." "I've been appointed as the farm vet. And so are you guys. Sorry for that."

There's a hen in there that is suffering She's dehydrated. They will not allow any of us to treat her, to tube her and give her electrolytes. Their people will only do it and they're not doing it right. They've never done it. So this hen is suffering and it's a major problem. The communication between we have an interim stay and to be able not be able to have any right and handle our animals is absolutely absolutely insane. and, let's talk about that these animals, it's not their fault. It's not anybody's fault and we definitely shouldn't be being punished, but these animals are being punished. We're being punished and, we have some hay coming in, getting police escorted in right now. Again, your taxpayer dollars hard at work.

Speaker announces intrusion with, "Open the door. They're coming in." and "Loving citizen." They describe the scene as "It's weird working here" and state, "I think they're trying to get them out in the pen, but they're feeding them." They warn, "This is a stain on Canadian history if this goes forth" and ask, "What has this country come to now?" They emphasize care, noting, "These are animals that have lived for two hundred and fifty one days without illness, have been taken care of." They add, "We've been out here since January 22, our first convoy out here." They question, "Don't you let them test the animals? Why don't you let them test the animals?" and assert, "You're not even a government organization." They close with a call: "Please share this out and make people aware of what is going on."

Feeding 71 rescue horses, I was interrupted by 6 to 8 DEC officers who presented a warrant for a squirrel and a raccoon. They searched my property for five hours, eventually finding Peanut the squirrel and Fred the raccoon. I was in the process of obtaining legal ownership for Peanut as an educational animal. Taking Peanut not only affects my family but also our nonprofit, Peanut's Freedom Farm, which started because of him. I rescued Peanut seven years ago after his mother was killed. He never developed survival instincts and was attacked, leading me to let him live indoors. Peanut became famous online, gaining 3 million followers across social media, which I believe prompted the complaint. It’s shocking that such resources were used against a nonprofit animal rescue, treating us like criminals over a squirrel and a raccoon.

Checklist for Summary Approach: - Identify core claims, actors, and the sequence of events described. - Preserve key terms and labels used in the transcript (e.g., quarantine, CFIA, RCMP liaison, kill pen, garlic). - Exclude repetitive content, filler, and off-topic tangents. - Emphasize unique or surprising details (e.g., land seizure claims, access point construction, specific directives). - Translate or present clearly in English if needed; maintain factual phrasing without added judgments. - Keep within 400-501 words; present information neutrally and precisely as stated. Summary: The speakers discuss a site involved in a quarantine and protest conflict, focusing on where protesters would gather and how access and fencing were arranged. They describe an “Austrians” group and supporters, noting a Hay Bale corral built as a kill pen. They say the quarantine was originally issued on coordinates, with December 31 as the reference date, and that CFIA declared a quarantine area, recognizing protesters would be present and that there would be a single road in. The speakers assert that protesters arrived and that those enforcing the quarantine expected immediate compliance and slaughter, but when protests were anticipated, the plan changed. They claim a land seizure occurred in September to seize access for roads, stating “That’s our land” and “I’m the garlic girl.” They contend the seized land was never a quarantine and that the purpose of seizing it was to build roads and access points for operations, including routes to avoid protesters during shift changes. They emphasize that these roads were not desired by them, as they wanted private access from the highway to protect the property from poachers and trespassers; the new access points were added after seizure, enabling tractor trailer movement for hay, bins, and the kill wall logistics. They explain that back access to their property was never wanted, but the new routes were created for the other party’s use. The discussion covers obstacles to obtaining garlic from their land, attributed to “hired security” present on site. They identify the main access point as the police line where supporters are, and reference a video of an interaction at that gate where access to their own house was refused. They recount an earlier period when entry had been possible, followed by an interview with Rebel News, after which they received a text from the RCMP liaison and faced delays; one participant notes an email from CFIA directing not to enter their mother’s property without emailing CFIA first, and mentions difficulties with an email address that bounced. They describe attempts to coordinate with police and authorities, including Katie’s efforts to get access to their property; at times, police ignored those attempting to facilitate entry. They note the logistical purpose behind the operation: the protestors’ presence, the kill-wall setup, road-building, and the logistics of bringing in hay, straw, and other materials. Toward the end, there’s a plan to address broad questions publicly: Jim Kerr will join Katie and others to compile a list of questions and discuss them with the family, aiming to present clear answers in a forthcoming video, thus reducing stress by offering transparent information. The speakers express a sense of shared stress, family ties, and a desire to handle questions openly, concluding with appreciation for those present.

The speaker warns that farmers who protected animals for 35 years face action on private property, insisting, "We are not a commercial poultry facility. We are not poultry." They claim the animals deserve to be fed by their hands as they face euthanization and life eradication, with "Decades of life" being put into dumpsters and "Decades of life is gonna fall to their knees" within 24–48 hours if people do not act. They call for "true leadership" in Canada and urge, "This is our time." They plead for help to save the animals, emphasizing they are not sick or tested. They recount being mocked by RCMP officers and demand removal of a constable from their property, deeming the situation unethical and asking to be remembered.

The speaker declares the event described as “one of the biggest crimes in Canadian history,” claiming that on November 6 the Canadian Food Inspection Agency waged war on the speaker’s family and their farm. The attack took place in a peaceful valley inhabited by over 300 animals described as “prehistoric sentient beings” who had names, personalities, and had been part of the family for decades; the speaker emphasizes that these animals were integral to the family’s identity. The speaker asserts that none of these animals were ever tested, and specifically notes that “not one of those ostriches” were tested, yet they were gunned down “in the middle of the night,” described with strong language as being done by “cowards.” The assertion repeats that “not one of those animals had ever been tested.” The speaker then challenges the listener, asking how such an action could occur and how a family or a country could recover from a massacre that is described as barbaric. The rhetoric emphasizes an urgent grievance that life was treated as if it did not matter and that heartbeats no longer held meaning. The speaker expresses that, as a result, it feels as though there has been a loss of meaning for what life means and what life is. Key claims include: the incident as a major crime in Canadian history; a targeted action against the speaker’s family and their farm by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency; the presence of over 300 named, personable animals considered part of the family identity; the animals’ innocence in terms of testing; the killing of ostriches by nighttime action described as cowardly; and the broader emotional and existential impact—questions about how to move forward after what is described as a massacre and the sense that life’s value has been eroded.

Sheila Gunn Reed reports she's headed to Edgewood BC to Universal Ostrich Farm to assist Drea Humphrey, as the Canadian Food Inspection Agency is set to impose a call on 400 healthy ostriches because the birds were exposed to avian flu two hundred and fifty days ago. The birds are healthy; Canadian Food Inspection Agency refuses to test them to ensure they are healthy or sick before they kill them. And the worst part is that these are not birds fit for human consumption. They’re not birds meant for cowboy boots. These are birds used in research for diseases like avian flu and COVID nineteen. RCMP descended on the farm this morning; Drea has been sleeping on the ground in tent. I’ll swing through Calgary to pick up Starlink. If this call happens, it’s a dark day for property rights, for Canadian agriculture, for science. To help, go to savetheostriches.com.

Katie and Carrie discuss the mass culling of 400 ostriches at Universal Ostrich Farms in British Columbia, which is set to occur by February 1st due to alleged avian flu. Katie, the owner's daughter, explains the farm's history and their shift from meat production to focusing on the ostriches' natural immunity. Carrie, the litigation manager, highlights the lack of accountability in the government's actions and the questionable testing methods used to declare the birds infected. They express outrage over the expectation that the family must euthanize their healthy animals and the absurdity of the situation, emphasizing the need for public awareness and legal action to protect the ostriches and challenge government overreach. They encourage support through their website, saveourostriches.com, to help fund their legal battle.

You are expecting what the outcome is. I will. What what was need to put CFIA exactly where they need to be put in check. This organization feels that they are greater than the Supreme Court of Canada, that they are still positioning the birds and putting them in the position to be killed immediately. The Supreme Court has not decided what is happening, we are on a stay order. and yet they, I just get a phone call that they've got a whole bunch of birds herded in a little circle right in the kill pen waiting. This is, it's animal cruelty, it's anguish to the families, this is terrorism and this is such disrespect to our Canadian government of justice that this company thinks they're better than the Supreme Court of Canada now. Amen.

Speaker from Universal Ostrich Farms says, "The Canadian Food Inspection Agency lied to us." They were in pens and "all we were asking to do was to humanely feed our animals while they prepare." They stressed, "We were not there to obstruct. We just wanted to feed our animals so that they got fed properly." After awaiting confirmation, they were told they could feed, then police surrounded the farm and arrested them. They describe "psychological warfare and tyranny and overreach, you name it" and say they were taken to a YRB lot, handcuffed, and separated by two plastic chairs. They were given a personal cell phone to call their lawyer and had ostrich poop on their feet. They claim, "these animals are infected," but they say "they have antibodies" and cite a firewall. They thank supporters and send a message to family.

Someone states they are passionate after 34 years of caring for animals that live to 75 and have names. They ask that "Connor," "Ethan," and "Lulu" not be shot. They acknowledge there's a policy in place, but argue it's time for a change, suggesting a report indicating every bird looks healthy. Another person responds that going against the entire industry is not their decision, and that changing to a non-eradication approach requires a national conversation with the CFIA and the Canadian government. When asked how long it would take for an ostrich to die from sickness, the response is hours to days, depending on the disease. Someone counters that there have been no avian flu deaths on the farm in eight days. Another person states that the challenge is control versus eradication, because one diagnosis puts the entire population at risk, mandating destruction.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the war in agriculture, focusing on what they allege is horrendous treatment by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) of Universal Ostrich Farms. They recount a live farm feed from the previous night in which Katie, a friend of Speaker 0, appears distraught as she pleads with the CFIA to stop killing her birds. They claim that hundreds of bullets were fired at the birds, according to eyewitnesses, and estimate that perhaps 100 birds remain. They assert that the CFIA has been culling the herd already and had foreknowledge of a Supreme Court ruling, implying the CFIA acted to eliminate birds without accountability. The speakers state that the RCMP stood by and did nothing, including when the farm formally filed charges. They describe alleged collusion among CFIA, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, and the government, accusing them of harassment, lassoing, chasing, and injecting the birds for five weeks. The speakers argue that the birds must be tested to prove the CFIA acted for political reasons rather than for health, science, public protection, wildlife protection, or disease prevention. They echo Joe Warmington of the Toronto Sun in insisting on testing the birds and determining how many remain to prevent a cover-up. They emphasize that the cover-up cannot start now and reject any expectation that it will. They describe Katie as distraught, weeping, and appealing for mercy while watching her ostriches be shot throughout the night, characterizing Canada’s CFIA as analogous to the NKVD, Stalin’s secret police, in contrast to other historical comparisons used in the discussion. The discussion includes live audio elements and commentary about sound from the kill area, with uncertainty about why shots sound distant or off to the left. They reference a prior night’s events and plan to provide more footage and details about the shootings. They state their position that the CFIA’s actions are political and not health-related, and they insist on continued testing and transparency regarding the number of birds remaining. The conversation frames the events as part of a broader “war on agriculture,” asserting that the cover-up and lack of accountability are central concerns. Katie’s interview from the prior day is described as distressing, with the host noting the emotional toll of the situation on her.

CFIA controls your property under a search warrant and "they were gracious enough to allow you to access the house, and that's it." You may come onto the property "only to access the house." The RCMP are not the lead authority here, but "being that it's a search warrant, we lawfully need to ensure in conjunction with CFIA that nothing's being breached." CFIA expressed, "you can access it's uncommon for somebody to access a search warrant area. Right?" They said you may come onto the property "only to access the house." The CFIA "has never spoken to us ever." Communication needs to go through CFIA because "they are the lead." These lines are "very clear" and we have to ensure that nobody colors outside of them. "We're the messengers."

the rental car company that took all their keys back from them. Clearway. the other company that was supposed to do the supposed cleanup is gone. We don't know who they've got left. And we don't know who the killers will be. it's sickening that they're gonna come in here and kill these healthy animals. it's just I can't believe that our society lets things like this happen. And then it's backed up by the court. You know, the court says they can come on your farm anytime on a suspicion and kill every one of your animals. See, two people already got arrested. I think you're aware who who those two people are. I didn't get arrested because I brought the truck out. Thank god. They let us go feeding. They were arrested in the back corner where nobody is. we were starting to build some trust. we gotta get to the bottom of it until we talk to Karen and Katie. We won't know and they'll take the truck out.

The speaker rails against what they call state-funded propaganda from Canada, focusing on a CBC piece and a two-minute segment from This Hour Has Twenty Two Minutes about an ostrich crisis in Edgewood, British Columbia. They describe the CBC as a crown corporation funded by taxpayers and labeled it “state funded propaganda.” The core topic is a farm in Edgewood with about 400 ostriches that have been on the farm for over 35 years. After ostrich testing related to antibodies in eggs and yolk during COVID, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) ordered the kill of all ostriches on the farm, including the healthy birds, citing an avian flu outbreak. The speaker explains that in December 2024 two ostriches were tested by the CFIA with anal swab PCR; the results allegedly indicated avian flu (H5N1) in those two carcasses. The farm challenged the CFIA decision in federal court, and by May the court found the CFIA’s decision not inherently unreasonable and allowed the kill order to stand. The farm appealed to the Court of Appeal in Ottawa, and by August the appellate court upheld that the birds should be killed, despite eight months of healthy birds on the farm. The farm then pursued a Supreme Court of Canada route, with an interim protective order preventing slaughter while the Supreme Court considers whether to hear the case; if they do not hear it, the protective order lapses and the CFIA may proceed with slaughter. A standoff has persisted for about a month, with the CFIA constructing kill pens and the RCMP providing armored protection to the CFIA. The farm asserts that about 100 ostriches are missing and that one ostrich died under CFIA custody from dehydration and neglect, named Spirit. The speaker claims the CFIA did not administer electrolytes and that the ostrich died, alleging mistreatment by CFIA personnel who refused to provide proper care. The speaker notes that journalists, protestors, and the RCMP are present at the site, and that the CFIA has refused to provide a proper count of the remaining birds. They accuse the CFIA of misleadingly portraying the situation in BC as an ongoing outbreak and claim the birds have been healthy for nearly a year and have not been retested since December 2024, except for the two dead birds tested. They allege that the only testing occurred on dead carcasses and suggest potential false positives due to testing methods. They criticize the segment for omitting key timeline details about the outbreak and for implying the birds are sick, which the speaker contends is false. The speaker mentions external figures like Robert Kennedy Jr. and Dr. Oz showing interest in the birds, and notes blows against Florida as part of the propaganda framing. Throughout, the speaker asserts that the birds are healthy, the CFIA is withholding retesting, and the CBC piece is an example of manufacturing consent and disinformation. They urge viewers to unsubscribe or resist the show, claim the segment is insidious, and argue that the real issue is government control and alignment with global health agreements rather than animal illness. The confrontation concludes with a call to share the video and to recognize the broadcast as propaganda, while ending with personal promotional remarks about health, sunlight, and Florida.

The speakers describe an eerily devastated site with extensive property damage and a semi-dismantled kill pen in the background, suggesting blood, carnage, and possible biohazard concerns. They note that the perpetrators “drove all around it and left,” then disappeared, leaving behind an impression of what happened. Speaker 1 observes enormous bales—much larger than typical hay bales—stacked on the property, describing them as about a foot to four feet high. They remark that birds are landing inside the area and pecking at whatever is there. They reference video from the day with dead ostriches still present, noting flocks of birds arriving, implying concern about the bird flu. The speakers recount that “they drove all around in the killing fields” and “kicking up hay as they left,” describing the act as tearing down their operations and leaving in a dismissive manner after terrorizing the family for a long period and slaughtering many birds. They mention “a thousand rounds” fired by marksmen that night, and state that this had “nothing to do with avian flu,” asserting that those shots were unrelated to the flu. Speaker 0 points to a pickup they saw stuck and seized in the area, with windows left open, illustrating the chaos and mess left behind. They emphasize the long duration of distress endured: “eleven months of hell, over six weeks or something like that of having this occupied land,” with RCMP provoking people and CFIA marksmen shooting, followed by the aftermath. Speaker 1 echoes the mess, suggesting it would have been easier to stack the birds or manage them differently, rather than creating the visible wreckage. They reiterate the claim that if the situation is labeled a biohazard, wild birds are currently seen around the area. They observe birds flying over the site, including a duck, indicating ongoing wildlife presence. Both speakers conclude by questioning the process: with an anonymous tip or accusation triggering CFIA involvement, suspicion alone seems to trigger actions that lead to destruction of holdings. They assert that CFIA will come in, destroy everything, and leave scorched earth, killing all animals, presenting this as the outcome. They end with the statement that this is Canada, folks.