reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Surveillance showed her tossing containers and liquid then lunging toward the victim. Officers inform her, 'Ma'am, you're gonna be under arrest for assault.' She responds, 'I did not assault nobody.' As they attempt to arrest her and take her phone, she asserts, 'What is the definition of assault?' A partner replies, 'Assault is when you think you're about to receive a battery.' She repeats, 'He tried to kill me' and 'He tried to assassinate me.' She also says, 'You protected white people only. You protected the fallen angel and this Arab.' The officers note, 'Everything that you told us is gonna be noted in the report.' A request is made: 'Get a female.' She says, 'Do not touch me. I'm a Muslim.' The officer replies, 'Okay. I'm gonna buckle you up. Okay? For safety.' She insists, 'I'm going to jail.'

What happens if I don't take my hat off? If you refuse, you'll be arrested and fingerprinted, but then released. So, I'll be arrested just for wearing a hat that says "Make America Great"? Yes, that's correct. It doesn't even mention Donald Trump. We're trying to maintain order, but yes, that's the situation.

Where did you go? I have it all on camera. How could you get arrested again? You can't just touch people. It's not a pardon. This is superior court. You don't get to just put your hands on people. You don't get to come here and do whatever you want. You just assaulted me, and now you're getting arrested. Good job, you idiot. You pathetic piece of shit. You just assaulted me. Where's your mom? He doesn't intimidate me. He doesn't get to come here and assault people and do whatever he wants. Fuck you. Stay right there.

Someone is being assaulted. The speaker denies involvement, stating, "I wasn't there." The speaker accuses others of assaulting an innocent person and claims they caused the situation. The speaker also states, "You just touched me. Do not touch me."

Patrick recounts an altercation that began when he grabbed and threw the hat of a person wearing a "Make America Great Again" hat. He states he didn't hit the person, but the person then "came at" him. Patrick says a friend, Gerald, saw the person attack him and intervened. Patrick admits to grabbing the person and taking him to the ground, hitting him once in the jaw. He claims he stopped the altercation after the person indicated he was done fighting. Patrick denies that anyone tripped the person. He says he was honest about starting the incident by throwing the hat. He says he didn't touch the person's food. Later, Patrick is informed he is being arrested for assault. He is read his rights and taken to a holding facility. An officer questions Patrick's actions, asking if he thought the person was "asking for" a confrontation by wearing the hat. Patrick states he didn't think he had the right to start throwing hands over a hat.

I'm here with Enrique Torre, founder of the Proud Boys. I was just arrested outside the capital because a woman was following us, even saying she'd follow me to the hotel. During a press conference, I felt like I was hit with a needle while she hovered over me. I grabbed her phone and tossed it. Capitol police picked me up instead of her and booked me for simple assault. I'm pretty sure the charges will be dropped. It's nonsense lawfare, and it won't stand.

An individual with a "Trump hat" is confronted by others, with one person repeatedly calling them a "fascist" and telling them to "go home." The person wearing the hat asks why it matters where they are from, then states they are from Poland and love Americans, while accusing the others of hating Americans. One person says they love immigrants. The person with the hat says that most Americans voted for Trump. The person wearing the hat questions why someone is wearing a mask if they are proud. They accuse someone of being "self loathing" and "unattractive." They also say someone following them is "orgasmica." They state they fought for the flag. The person wearing the hat yells that someone is going to jail for spitting on them and scaring their baby.

Patrick recounts an altercation after he threw a "Make America Great Again" hat worn by another individual. He admits to grabbing the hat but claims he didn't hit the hat-wearer. According to Patrick, the hat-wearer then "came at" him, initiating physical contact. Patrick says his friend, Gerald, witnessed the event and intervened. Patrick admits to hitting the hat-wearer once, in the jaw, before stopping the assault. Patrick states that he and his friends walked away from the scene and were later contacted by the police. He expresses confusion about potential charges, questioning if taking the hat constitutes assault. He denies that anyone in his group tripped the hat-wearer or touched his food. Patrick is informed of his rights, searched, and taken to a holding facility. He and the officer discuss the reasonableness of his actions, with the officer stating that Patrick had no right to touch the other individual, regardless of the hat.

A man states he wants legal representation, claiming police officers have not allowed him any. He says he doesn't know what is going on. An officer asks if he shot the president and if he was in the building at the time. The man confirms he works in the building, so naturally he was there. He claims he is being taken in because he lives in Missouri and that he is just a patsy.

The speaker is wearing a MAGA hat and is being followed and "belly bumped" by someone. The speaker tells the person to not touch them and to get away. The speaker accuses the person of being a "freak" and wanting "some action." The speaker threatens to call the police and plans to complain to the management about the person's behavior. The speaker believes the person's actions are due to the MAGA hat.

Speaker 0 expresses love and respect for the police, but believes that people should not be allowed to assault others without consequences. Speaker 1 argues that when confrontations occur, it doesn't matter who initiates the first push, as it is considered a consensual fight. Speaker 0 denies getting into people's faces and explains that they were present to call the police. Speaker 1 counters that Speaker 0 was very close to people. Speaker 0 clarifies that they walked away from the situation multiple times, but were surrounded and punched in the face. Speaker 1 agrees that whoever punched Speaker 0 should be charged. Speaker 0 expresses disbelief and questions why Speaker 1 is behaving this way. Speaker 1 dismisses Speaker 0's gender as irrelevant to the situation. Speaker 0 emphasizes that they were not engaged in a mutual confrontation and asserts their right to be present. Speaker 2 asks whose orders the police are acting on, but Speaker 1 ignores the question.

The speaker states someone hit them and another person, and they don't care if the perpetrator goes to prison. They tell the person not to touch the other person again and to leave. The speaker then says "thank you, sir."

An individual named Evan was arrested for assault, allegedly involving pepper spray. The arrest occurred because he asked a woman wearing a mask to remove it. Others present interfered with the arrest. Law enforcement warned those interfering that they would be arrested if they continued to obstruct them.

Patrick recounts an altercation that began when he took a "Make America Great" hat from a person on the street. He admits to grabbing the hat and throwing it, stating he didn't hit or body check the person. According to Patrick, the other individual then "came at" him, initiating physical contact. Patrick says his friend Gerald witnessed this and intervened. Patrick admits to hitting the person once in the jaw before walking away. Patrick claims he didn't intend to start a fight, only to make a statement about the hat. He denies that anyone in his group tripped the other person or touched his food. He says Gerald intervened only after the other person initiated physical contact. Patrick is informed he is being arrested and charged with assault. He is taken to a holding facility.

The speaker is involved in a confrontation with someone, repeatedly telling them to step back and not touch them. Another person tries to intervene and calm the situation. The speaker continues to assert their rights to be in a certain area and questions why they are being told to back up. The conversation becomes heated and the speaker uses profanity. The video ends with the speaker expressing frustration and defiance.

The video begins with Speaker 0 stating that they are allowed to film in a public place. Speaker 1 acknowledges this and says they don't have to talk. Speaker 0 insists on speaking and explains that they need to establish why Speaker 1 is in the public place. Speaker 1 questions what crime has been committed and Speaker 0 mentions that Speaker 1 is not wearing a face mask, which is an offense. Speaker 1 claims to be exempt, but Speaker 0 insists on seeing their exemption and proceeds to place Speaker 1 under arrest. Speaker 1 resists and a struggle ensues. The video ends with Speaker 1 being restrained by the police.

Patrick recounts an altercation that began when he grabbed and threw a "Make America Great" hat worn by another individual. He admits to touching the hat but claims he didn't hit the hat-wearer. According to Patrick, the hat-wearer then "came at" him, initiating physical contact. Patrick says his friend Gerald witnessed the attack and intervened. Patrick admits to hitting the hat-wearer once in the jaw before walking away. Patrick denies that anyone in his group tripped the hat-wearer or touched his food. He states he was called by police and decided to cooperate, believing he hadn't done anything illegal besides touching the hat. He expresses confusion about being arrested, as he claims the other individual also "threw hands." He is informed he is being arrested for assault and will be taken to a holding facility. The officer states that they are compiling information to make decisions. Patrick is read his rights and processed.

What happens if I don't take my hat off? If you refuse, you'll be arrested and processed, but not taken to jail. You'll be fingerprinted and then released. So, I will be arrested just for wearing a hat? Yes, specifically for wearing a "Make America Great Again" hat. We’re just trying to ensure a fair voting process.

An individual tells someone to stop what they are doing with their job and says, "Don't touch me," while the other person denies touching them. Another person intervenes, stating their hands are separate and urging everyone to let it go. This person then warns that they will be arrested and asserts they are not supposed to be there, claiming there is a law against their presence. They accuse the group of being outsiders bringing violence.

I was arrested for a potential hate crime after allegedly assaulting two Donald Trump supporters. I approached one woman to ask why she was voting for Trump because she seemed proud. The woman said she was shocked by my presence and claimed it was because of her skin color. I shoved her, and she told me not to touch her. I then put my hand to her chin. When her friend stepped in, I punched her, connecting with her jaw. The two women are physically okay, but shaken. Police say I showed no remorse. I believe both sides of the political spectrum have valid points and we need to come together. A judge found probable cause for a hate crime offense and two counts of fourth-degree assault and prosecutors have a day to make a charging decision.

Alfred Lewis, a 19-year-old, admits to making a mistake and believes everyone makes mistakes. The video in question shows Lewis striking a man from behind, but he claims that he later shook the man's hand and gave him a hug, which cannot be verified. Lewis expresses surprise at how things escalated and didn't expect it to go so wrong.

A person claims to have been assaulted on the street and confronts the alleged attacker, recording the incident. Another person intervenes, stating that the alleged attacker should be arrested. The original person argues that their approach is justified because they were assaulted. The intervention continues to insist that the alleged attacker should not have brought their aggression onto a bus with passengers. The original person accuses the alleged attacker of being a hate criminal and demands their arrest. The intervention disagrees and suggests calling the police instead. The original person expresses a desire to live their life peacefully and asks to be left alone. The intervention expresses frustration and asks the original person to sit elsewhere. The original person eventually agrees and expresses a desire to avoid further conflict.

An individual questions whether an action is due to security concerns or intimidation. The response indicates it is a security matter. Another person is told to stay away from someone. An individual asks why they aren't being arrested and demands to see video footage. Someone is told to calm down. An individual states "They will arrest me. I know nothing." Another person is asked if they would arrest someone else, claiming to have seen that person slap someone. It is asserted that no one said "stab him." Someone states they are on the side of another person.

Speaker 0: Well, they already have come. Yeah. We don't like it. Yeah. Because they're trying to take our land. Speaker 1: Right. Oh. Speaker 2: You're under arrest. Speaker 1: I have the right to conduct a systems arrest, Speaker 2: and Speaker 1: he is under arrest. I'm detaining him under my police powers. Speaker 2: He's not Speaker 1: going anywhere. He can sit here until the police arrives. He's biting me. He's biting me. This is the left guys who currently just been assaulted for having to base with people. Okay? We've just been insulted by a number of people. Come over, flip the table, smash some camera equipment. I grabbed one, the man who did it, put him under a citizen's arrest, asked him please to be called. University staff have come in, assaulted me even though I clearly indicated he's under a citizen's arrest. I had him there. I said, call the police, call the police, call the police. So I requested that you lot were called. Yeah. And the university staff have come in and assaulted me and helped him get away. Britain needs mass deportations. This is my organization. Manners. We've been talking with you. Speaker 2: Have no Speaker 1: rush, Connor. Speaker 2: Woah. Woah. Woah. Woah. How? How? For what? Help. Help. Get the fuck off of this. Criminals. Speaker 1: We are young or little. I have done no crime. I've been here engaging in a public, peaceful debate, and this is how the police act. This is not acceptable in England. This is meant to be some sort of democracy. We are meant to have free fish in this country, and my ancestors went through two world wars. But there's something I can't breathe. I can't breathe. You are criminals. You're violent two d criminals. The minute you knew what was on that banner, you decided let's go

A man states he wants legal representation, claiming police officers have not allowed him any. He says he doesn't know what is going on. An officer asks if he shot the president and if he was in the building at the time. The man replies that he works in the building, so naturally he was there. He claims he is being taken in because he lives in Missouri and that he is just a patsy.