TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In Helsinki, Dr. Hanna Nochonek testified that Finnish health authorities knew COVID vaccines didn't fully prevent transmission since summer 2021. They advised the government to stop using COVID passes by the end of the year, but the government ignored it. A citizen, Mikka Vahokala, is suing the government over this issue. For more information, visit casecovidpass.com. Helsinki correspondent for Positivity and Good TV.

Vaccines don't cause autism. The science is clear. Vaccines don't cause autism. Vaccines do not cause autism. I do not deny that we need to do more about autism, but it has nothing to do with vaccines. We have thoroughly debunked any association between autism and these vaccines. Robert, it is nearly consensus in the scientific community that there's no link there. To deny a mountain of scientific evidence, which has already taught us that the combination of measles, mumps, rubella, or MMR vaccine doesn't cause autism, Vimerosal, an ethylmercury containing preservative that wasn't a number of vaccines doesn't cause autism, and that too many vaccines given too soon, if you will, doesn't also cause autism. We know that the schedule is safe. Are there peer reviewed scientific reports that indicate a link between No. Between vaccines and autism? No. Not only is there not a peer reviewed work, this is probably the most studied public health issue involving children. Vaccines are really the one thing we have looked at as causing autism. The Institutes of Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control have repeatedly investigated this. Vaccines do not cause autism. We don't need more research. At some point, enough is enough. It's fine to continue to collect data, but at some point, you have to take note for an answer. We're not sure what causes autism, but we know that vaccines do not. Mountains of evidence. No, you know, this has been looked at extensively. Nothing's been more studied in the world than this connection between vaccines and autism. We'd heard it. We've heard it for decades. You know, actually almost a century now, if you want to get into it. This has been the battle cry of the pharmaceutical industry and every shill that works for them. But whether you know it or not all the way back in 2020 for those of you that were watching then we actually disproved this myth right then. Debunked it with a lawsuit where we went at the CDC and said really if the head of your page on the CDC website says vaccines plural meaning all vaccines do not cause us to do we have that original website. This is what it said: vaccines do not cause autism. There it is. All vaccines doesn't say one of them or two of them all vaccines by the plural s at the end of vaccines. If vaccines do not cause autism will you please provide us with all of the evidence and studies that show that vaccines don't cause autism. Send us that evidence. Well they didn't and we sued them and we went to court. Back in 2020, we won the case. Here it looks like in the document. They gave us the list. It's actually 20 studies. 20 total studies make up the entire list of what they look to when they say that these childhood vaccines, the five, and the cumulative effects of them given in the first six months of life, do not cause autism. The first one is an MMR study. The second one an MMR and a DTaP study. The next ones are MMR, these four are MMR and Thimerosal studies. Then the next all the way through to 20 are all just Thimerosal studies. Lastly, we have one antigen study. Of the 20 studies, the first MMR studies are not in the first six months of life; Thimerosal studies show none of the vaccines in the first six months of life had Thimerosal. There was only one study relevant to the first six months of life, the IOM review of the DTaP vaccine, and it said there are no studies that prove or disprove the association with autism. Therefore, that was the only one that was relevant to the first six months of life, and it proved that they had no answers. And so for everyone that's ever sent Mountain of Evidence, that's been a lie. We won in court. It's a lie. You can take that to the bank. And actually just months after winning that lawsuit, that was in May, by August they pulled down the statement vaccines do not cause autism. We celebrated it but five months later it went back up and we've been stuck there with this propaganda statement that have no basis in science up until last night when this happened to the website. Let's see the new page. Here it is. It now says autism and vaccines and right under that it has the key points. So we read those key points. The claim vaccines do not cause autism is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism, meaning those vaccines in the first six months of life. Meaning the IOM lawsuit that proved that. Studies supporting a link have been ignored by health authorities. HHS has launched a comprehensive assessment of the causes of autism, including investigations on plausible biologic mechanisms and potential causal links. It does have an explanatory statement I want to read right now. It says this about why you will still see it with an asterisk the header vaccines do not cause autism has not been completely removed due to an agreement with the chair of the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee that it would remain on the CDC website. Apparently, this was that backroom deal that was made with Senator Cassidy, of course, when Robert Kennedy Jr. was up there. But now you can see on the page it is clear we are making the statement or it's being made by the CDC that this is not a scientific statement and so ultimately this is a massive change. I tweeted out about it today and to every parent of an autistic child that's been out there. For every one of you that did interviews, whether in the film Vaxxed or when we toured the nation and for everyone that's ever been gaslit, the days of gaslighting are over. We are now moving into science-based, evidence-based statements on the CDC website. It's a beautiful day.

Let me just say, first of all, that you don't wear a mask on an airplane because of Health Freedom Defense Fund. We're the organization that challenged and defeated the federal travel mask mandate in 2022, so that's another one of our big cases. And then we have a huge case that's still underway. We just lost the final the last round of our second case against the Los Angeles Unified School District, but it's not over yet. And we defeated the federal mandate that, green card applicants from abroad get the COVID shot just earlier this year. We've had many, many, many, many wins. So I just wanted people to understand, you know, have a little bit of context of who I am.

- it's that he took the COVID vaccine off the recommended schedule for children. - 95% of parents were already rejecting that advice, and actually 85% of healthcare workers rejecting that advice. - when these people in the media say that they are standing up for science, they are saying they're going against 95% of parents, and they want every single six month old in this country to have a mandated mRNA COVID injection. - There is a memo going around at the CDC and throughout HHS about how to subvert president Trump and how to subvert secretary Kennedy. - They're saying we're gonna outlast them, that the Republicans are gonna lose the midterms, that this is gonna be a flash in the pan.

Speaker 0 says that "'the entire schedule has never been tested' and that 'the government's own advisers have been telling telling them to do it.' They add that this lawsuit 'hopefully will get wide circulation, and it'll cause the public to demand safety testing and accountability of the CDC.' They describe the approach as 'It's just aggressive is very, very euphemistic. I'd call it much worse, but it just oh, I I think it's crazy.'"

"dreadful use of vaccines and the mandates that have caused so much problem." "From the very beginning, these vaccines were not vaccines, particularly the ones that ended up after AstraZeneca with all the clots and they were shut down." "The messenger RNA vaccines of Pfizer and Moderna, of course, unbelievable problems and damage to people." "They were pushed into this by Pfizer and all the people that Pfizer and Moderna wanted to get this into everybody." "These were not vaccines. These were horrible gene therapies that could actually integrate into your genome." "turbo cancers." "They are incompetence, medical negligence, everything, and nobody is accepting responsibility for this." "This is Nuremberg trial stuff." "They were never ever effective." "There was no evidence that they were effective whatsoever. It was basically hope, and they were never ever safe."

From September 2021 to July 2022, the speaker claims T-Mobile treated them like a second-class citizen for being unvaccinated, despite offering to take daily tests. They were allowed back into the office in July 2022, and T-Mobile removed the vaccine mandate in March 2023, which the speaker believes proved they didn't need a vaccine or mask. The speaker states they used data, analytics, and deductive reasoning to determine they didn't need a vaccine, viewing COVID as a flu-like disease. As part of the business continuity team, they helped T-Mobile leadership monitor employee exposures, store closures, and vaccine rates. The speaker says T-Mobile pulled back on the mandate because cases, illness, and death rates declined, but the company has not admitted any mistakes. The CEO and EVP of HR still believe the mandate was the best way to keep employees safe and encourage vaccination and boosters.

The CDC is actually being sued for operating an illegal and unconstitutional seventy two dose hyper vaccination schedule. All 72 of these doses from birth to age 18, not one has been tested in in combination. And particularly, the cumulative safety of seventy two doses was never studied. So it's literally just experimental at this point. Nobody knows what's gonna happen with all of these doses. And that's exactly why they're being sued to kind of dismantle this this dangerous program. This whole vaccine ideology is now crumbling down as people begin to understand the real risks and just how absurd it is. And even Trump highlighted that. He said, it's it's a travesty we're injecting beautiful babies with all these, you know, toxic loads of of needles. It's stupid, and it's gotta stop.

The CDC is actually being sued for operating an illegal and unconstitutional seventy two dose hyper vaccination schedule. All 72 of these doses from birth to age 18, not one has been tested in in combination. And particularly, the cumulative safety of seventy two doses was never studied. So it's literally just experimental at this point. Nobody knows what's gonna happen with all of these doses. And that's exactly why they're being sued to kind of dismantle this this dangerous program. And so this is huge. This whole vaccine ideology is now crumbling down as people begin to understand the real risks and just how absurd it is. And even Trump highlighted that. He said, it's it's a travesty we're injecting beautiful babies with all these, you know, toxic loads of of needles. It's stupid, and it's gotta stop.

Two physicians and a child health safety group filed a lawsuit against the CDC and the vaccine schedule, claiming '72 vaccines for children ages zero to 18 years old that has never been studied.' They say 'while we have studied each individual vaccine, they have never studied giving all of these vaccines together' and that 'the effects, the long term effects, never.' The suit asks to either 'study it' or 'change the category of vaccines.' They note that most vaccines are 'category a' while 'meningitis B and the COVID nineteen vaccine' are 'category b,' and they want all vaccines to be category b so that 'parents, exemptions, and physicians can work together to decide what's best for each child.' The CDC says 'we haven't studied it,' citing lack of nonvaccinating participants and cost. They say 'you get billions in funding' and question feasibility. The speaker invites thoughts and promises updates.

"The FDA recently revoked the emergency youth authorizations for three COVID vaccinations while simultaneously green lighting four new COVID nineteen vaccines with twenty twenty five and twenty twenty six formulas." "The the reason for the revocation of that emergency youth authorization is because obviously the COVID pandemic and the public health emergency is over." "But just to correct the record because there's been a lot of misinformation on this, the FDA's decision does not affect the availability of COVID vaccines for Americans who want them." "We believe in individual choice. That's a promise both the president and the secretary have made, and it's a promise they have now delivered on."

They watched every meeting of the advisory committees in 2021–2023 when COVID shots were authorized. "the CDC's own research showed that the protection from the vaccine, if any, was between months two and six. And by six months, it showed negative efficacy." They assert, "The COVID shots have negative efficacy after six months" and question, "how a shot with negative efficacy is saving lives, and it has the worst side effect profile of any vaccine in human history." "So how exactly is a vaccine with the worst side effects and negative efficacy saving lives?" They claim, "What ended the COVID pandemic was the Omicron variant that was more transmissible but less lethal." They question, "the vaccine, how many people it helped? It could be a net negative." They cite trial data: "'twenty one people died in the in the vaccinated group and seventeen died in in the, placebo group.'"

Questioning why it was mandated for young men and why we were told to act as if it stopped you from getting or spreading COVID, when it didn't stop infection or spread and it causes myocarditis at some rate. "It makes no sense." The speaker says he was reading the scientific evidence saying things like this, and yet if you said those things in public, you were cast as an anti vaxxer. "It's not an anti vaxx to say, Here's what the scientific evidence says. Here's the situations when it's beneficial to use this vaccine. Here's the situations when it's less likely beneficial. Here's what we know and here's what we don't know, right?" He advocated during the pandemic for older people to take the vaccine, but didn't advocate to force older people to take it. He was relieved when his mom took the vaccine in March 2021.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a set of legal actions taken by Health Freedom Defense Fund against the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) over COVID-19 vaccination mandates. - Health Freedom Defense Fund sued LAUSD in 2021 over an EUA vaccine mandate. They claim the district initially had a mandate, then appeared to repeal it, leading the court to dismiss that case as no longer ripe. Seventeen days after the dismissal, LAUSD implemented a new mandate stating employees could not test and subsequently fired a number of employees, with more than a thousand affected in total. Many faced loss of pensions, seniority, and employment. - A second lawsuit was filed in November 2021 arguing that the vaccines do not stop transmission or infection, a position the group says was supported by statements from the CDC in 2021 and by CMS in October 2021. Based on this, they argued that the vaccines are a private matter and should be treated as therapeutic rather than a public health issue. They also asserted that natural immunity is real and that Jacobson v. Massachusetts does not apply because the smallpox vaccination was assumed to be safe and effective only under historical conditions, which they argue do not hold for COVID-19. - The group reports strong initial success. Their argument won at first instance, and they achieved a favorable ruling on appeal before a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit. This led to an en banc review (broader panel) of the Ninth Circuit. Although typically taking many months, the en banc decision came after three months, and on July 31, the Ninth Circuit ruled against them. The court stated that what mattered was the existence of a public health emergency, rather than whether the vaccine stopped transmission or infection. The group contends this is a dangerous precedent and maintains that COVID-19 is not the same as smallpox, which had a 30 percent death rate; they reasoned that by August 2021, four percent of Los Angeles County residents had already been exposed and recovered, indicating the situation did not constitute the same emergency as smallpox. - The group notes that an appeal to the Supreme Court may be possible, and they are considering pursuing it. They emphasize that the court’s decision focused on the public health emergency rather than vaccine effectiveness against transmission or infection, which they argue is a troubling position. - The speakers discuss the potential implications and the perceived terrifying precedent, with the possibility of further appeals to higher courts being contemplated.

Checklist for summary approach: - Identify and restate the speaker’s claimed credentials (or lack thereof). - Capture the core activity described (deposing leading vaccine experts) and the basis for claims (actual evidence). - Note the courtroom principle contrasting titles versus evidence. - Outline the asserted strategic actions (legal action against specific agencies) and purported results. - Preserve the exact claim about the outcome of the lawsuits regarding vaccine safety science. - Present statements verbatim where feasible, and otherwise closely paraphrase to retain meaning. - Avoid adding judgments, external context, or evaluative commentary. Summary: The speaker introduces himself as Mister Siri and immediately clarifies that he is not a medical doctor, and not an immunologist or biologist or any kind of vaccinologist. He adds that despite lacking these titles, he “depose[s] them regularly, including the world’s leading ones with regards to vaccines,” and that he must base his claims on “actual evidence.” In describing his courtroom approach, he asserts that when he goes to court regarding vaccines, “I don’t get to rely on titles.” He then recounts a proposed strategic path he characterizes as a “genius way forward”: “We’re gonna sue the government agencies, HHS, FDA, NIH,” and he states that “we started winning.” The narrative then turns to the alleged outcomes of those legal actions, posing the question, “And what did we prove in those lawsuits?” followed by the claimed conclusion: “That the entire science behind vaccine safety was nothing but a complete fraud.” Throughout, the speaker frames the process as a shift from deference to credentials to a reliance on evidence obtained through deposition and litigation, culminating in purported victories against major federal health agencies. He presents the lawsuits as the mechanism by which the foundational science of vaccine safety was challenged, and he asserts that the result of these proceedings is a definitive statement that the science underpinning vaccine safety is fraudulent, as claimed within the transcript’s courtroom-centered account. The emphasis remains on the contrast between claimed authority and evidence-based legal challenges, as well as on the asserted procedural successes and the sweeping conclusion about vaccine-safety science.

Over 100 million Americans were required to get vaccinated due to job mandates. The government claimed vaccines were safe and effective, but data showed vaccinated people could still carry the virus. Despite promises of freedom, there have been 1 million adverse events reported from COVID-19 vaccines, with only 11 compensated cases. Big Pharma has immunity from liability for vaccine injuries.

The Queensland Supreme Court ruled COVID-19 vaccine mandates for emergency services were unlawful. Dr. Nick Coatsworth, a medical expert, acknowledged his role in promoting mandates but believes they were wrong. He stated mandates have a time limit in a pandemic, and we should reconsider their use in the future. Hindsight should guide our decisions for future pandemics.

The speaker questions whether OSHA has the authority to mandate vaccinations for 84 million Americans. Speaker 1 mentions that the Supreme Court has ruled on the matter. Speaker 0 criticizes Speaker 1 as an unelected bureaucrat, stating they cannot force people to take an experimental vaccine or show their papers. Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of attempting to fire 84 million workers and asks if they believe the court was wrong. Speaker 1 acknowledges that the court's decision is final. Speaker 0 quotes Speaker 1's statement to Reuters, where they express disappointment with the ruling but state that they will continue to encourage employers to implement safety measures.

I have 7 kids, and 5 of them have allergies. I was asked by Donald Trump to serve on a vaccine safety commission in 2016. During a meeting, I asked if there was any vaccine that had been tested for safety, but they couldn't provide any evidence. So, I sued them to show us a study on vaccine safety testing, but they said they didn't have any.

From September 2021 to July 2022, T-Mobile treated me like a second class citizen for being unvaccinated. I posted my exemption form that I submitted from September 2021 to my ex account so you can see what I said two years ago. I offered to take a daily test. I knew I wasn't at risk, and I knew I wasn't causing anyone else to be at risk. July 2022 was when T-Mobile finally allowed me back into the office in Frisco, Texas, and they ended up removing the mandate completely in March 2023. By ending the mandate, they proved me right. As an unvaccinated person, I didn't need a vaccine or a mask to live my life indoors. I'm not an expert. I'm not even that smart of a person. I just use data and analytics combined with deductive reasoning to determine I didn't need a vaccine and this was a flu like disease. I was even on the business continuity team during COVID. I helped T-Mobile senior leadership create dashboards to monitor employee exposures, local level exposures from the CDC, store closures, vaccine take rates, and the list goes on. I know way too much about COVID because of that job, but it helped me make educated decisions that I'm proud of today. The reasoning for pulling back on the vaccine mandate was because we entered a new phase of the pandemic where cases, serious illness, and death rates had declined dramatically. And they still to this day have not admitted any mistakes were made with the way they treated me. The CEO, Mike Sievert, and the EVP of Human Resources, Dean King, still believe it was the best way to keep employees safe and they strongly encourage all employees and their families to get vaccinated and boosted.

"Let me just say that the reason that I started Health Freedom Defense Fund was because, you know, going way back, I'd been in the Health Freedom space for twenty five years now or twenty years at that point." "And so I founded Health Freedom Defense Fund because I wanted to be able to fight back." "the biggest case, the first huge case that we won well, first, we stopped the Los Angeles Unified School District from mandating the EUA shot for their employees in March 2021." "The day after we filed it, they rescinded their mandate and said, oh, it wasn't really a mandate. It was just a suggestion."

The CDC is actually being sued for operating an illegal and unconstitutional seventy two dose hyper vaccination schedule. All 72 of these doses from birth to age 18, not one has been tested in in combination. And particularly, the cumulative safety of seventy two doses was never studied. So it's literally just experimental at this point. Nobody knows what's gonna happen with all of these doses. And that's exactly why they're being sued to kind of dismantle this this dangerous program. And so this is huge. This whole vaccine ideology is now crumbling down as people begin to understand the real risks and just how absurd it is. And even Trump highlighted that. He said, it's it's a travesty we're injecting beautiful babies with all these, you know, toxic loads of of needles. It's stupid, and it's gotta stop.

A New York state judge ruled that 10 employees fired by the New York City Department of Education for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine must be reinstated with back pay. The judge found that the city's denial of religious exemptions to certain teachers was unconstitutional and arbitrary. The judge stated that there was no rational basis for not allowing unvaccinated teachers among primarily unvaccinated students. The judge also referenced Mayor Eric Adams' lifting of the vaccine mandate for some private employees, suggesting that the mandate for public workers was arbitrary. Many workers lost their jobs for not adhering to the mandate. The ruling provides hope for those seeking justice through the courts.

Pfizer knew a month into the rollout, November 2020, that this vaccine did not work to stop COVID. Everything that followed—the mandates, the lost jobs, the closures, children not allowed back to school if they didn’t take the shot, the armed forces compelled to take it, pilots compelled—was built on a lie of vaccine efficacy. The most common side effect of getting vaccinated is COVID, and Pfizer understood that the vaccine’s efficacy and vaccine failure showed it did not stop COVID. They also knew the injection did not stay in the deltoid. Europeans through the EMA and public health entities described side effects as chills, fever, fatigue, needing to lie down, but Pfizer knew that was a lie. In Pfizer documents, charts show that the materials—the spike protein, the mRNA, the lipid nanoparticles, and polyethylene glycol—biodistribute within forty-eight hours and leave the injection site to biodistribute to major organs throughout the body, crossing the blood-brain barrier. This may have contributed to personality changes in some loved ones who took the injection. They also accumulate in the liver, the adrenals, the spleen, the lymphatic system, and in women, the ovaries. The first injection accumulates in ovaries; the second injection more so. Experts could not find any mechanism whereby this material left the body in either gender. By the first booster, surgeries on vaccinated women reported fully blocked ovaries, among other damage. Pfizer knew that. They also hired 2,400 full-time staff to process reports of serious adverse events, starting to receive them during the 2020-2021 period. In Pfizer documents, over forty-two thousand serious adverse events were tallied from November 2020 to February 2021, with many individuals experiencing multiple events. The top documented side effects included myalgia (muscle pain), followed by joint pain, then COVID itself, and then a catastrophic tally of serious side effects including heart damage (myocarditis, pericarditis), problems with the aorta, thrombotic events (blood clots in various locations), neurological events (tremors, Guillain-Barré, dementia, epilepsy-like seizures), autoimmune disorders, and eye damage including blindness. Reproductive damage was noted: miscarriages and other issues. Twelve hundred deaths in three months were recorded as not statistically random; they were old with prior conditions, yet doctors noted causality concerns and recorded them. Pfizer knew by April 2021 that minors were injured by the vaccine, specifically myocarditis and pericarditis. Minors sustained heart damage, with thirty-five minors affected. The Israeli Ministry of Health warned the CDC and the Biden administration about minor heart damage, but FOIA requests later showed active conversations up to the White House regarding myocarditis in minors. Instead of withdrawing or advising parents, a 17-page document was produced as a script to persuade parents to vaccinate their minors, supplemented by a TikTok influencer campaign encouraging young people to get injected. These communications indicated that kids would sustain deadly heart damage, and still proceeded. Senator Ron Johnson is using the work to unredact those documents and hold hearings about the cover-up. Pfizer knew all of these things.

- "After reviewing the science and consulting top experts at NIH and FDA, HHS has determined that mRNA technology poses more risk than benefits for these respiratory viruses." - "BARDA has begun the process of terminating these 22 contracts totaling just under $500,000,000 To replace the troubled mRNA programs, we're prioritizing the development of safer, broader vaccine strategies, like whole virus vaccines and novel platforms that don't collapse when viruses mutate." - "I'm still waiting for Robert Kennedy Jr. To say that we're going to wipe out mandates and everyone will have a choice, but this is a great step in the right direction." - "Half a billion dollars, 22 projects in the pipeline for mRNA vaccine technology." - "KFF Foundation did a survey on really what Americans are still going to want this vaccine going into the fall, the COVID vaccine."