TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Four companies—Pfizer, Merck, Blackstone, and Sanofi—produce all 72 vaccines and have a history of criminal behavior. Over the last decade, they collectively paid $35 billion in penalties for falsifying science, defrauding regulators, and causing harm. Merck's Vioxx, marketed as a headache pill, led to the deaths of up to 500,000 Americans due to heart attacks, while the company profited despite paying $7 billion in fines. No one was jailed for these actions. It’s difficult to believe these companies, known for dishonesty in other products, are suddenly trustworthy with vaccines. In the U.S., a law passed in 1986 prevents individuals from suing vaccine manufacturers, regardless of negligence or harm caused.

Kansas is filing a civil suit against Pfizer under the Kansas Consumer Protection Act for misleading marketing of its COVID-19 vaccine. This lawsuit, part of a multistate collaboration, highlights several deceptive practices. Pfizer falsely claimed its vaccine was safe for pregnant women, despite data showing adverse events and miscarriages. It denied links between its vaccine and heart conditions like myocarditis, despite evidence to the contrary. Pfizer also misrepresented the vaccine's effectiveness against variants and claimed it prevented transmission without conducting relevant studies. Additionally, Pfizer coordinated with social media to censor criticism of its vaccine. This suit follows Pfizer delivering over 3.3 million vaccine doses in Kansas, accounting for over 60% of the state's total. The case aims to address misleading marketing practices, as vaccine manufacturers have immunity from tort suits for injuries.

The Institute of Medicine reported in 2011 that over 150 vaccine-related injuries have not been studied, and the CDC has repeatedly been ordered to conduct these studies but has refused. The pharmaceutical companies producing vaccines, such as Merck, Sanofi, Glaxo, and Pfizer, have faced over $35 billion in penalties for misconduct. Trust in these companies is misplaced without solid scientific evidence. While vaccines should remain available for those who choose them, there is a need for rigorous scientific scrutiny. The FDA has misled the public in the past, as seen with Vioxx and opioids, raising concerns about their credibility regarding vaccine safety. The focus should be on ensuring public health, not pharmaceutical profits.

Pfizer in the UK breached regulations by promoting unlicensed medicines on social media, leading to a £30,000 fine. This ruling may pave the way for citizens to pursue legal action against Pfizer for vaccine injuries. The UK's compensation system for vaccine injuries could make it easier for affected individuals to seek recourse. The Telegraph highlighted the safety concerns surrounding the injections, potentially fueling lawsuits against Pfizer.

Pfizer breached multiple clauses of the 2019 code, including promoting an unlicensed medicine and making misleading claims about adverse reactions. The company's actions were deemed to bring discredit upon the pharmaceutical industry. This is the 6th time Pfizer has been reprimanded for similar offenses. Despite apologies, the regulatory consequences have been minimal. Calls for reform in the industry's oversight have been made.

Bayer knowingly sold an AIDS-infected medication called Factor 8 in the US, but when they couldn't sell it there anymore, they dumped it in France, Europe, Asia, and Latin America. The drug was used for hemophiliacs, especially children. The French government officials involved in allowing this were imprisoned, but no corporate executive in the US has faced justice. The FDA and the US government turned a blind eye to this tragedy. Thousands of innocent hemophiliacs have died from AIDS, and their family members have also been infected. Internal documents prove that Bayer was fully aware of the contamination. Bayer's claim of responsible and ethical behavior is just legal jargon.

The Department of Justice announced a historic $2.3 billion settlement with Pfizer and its subsidiary Pharmacia and Upjohn, the largest health care fraud settlement in DOJ history. This settlement addresses civil and criminal allegations regarding Pfizer's illegal promotion of drugs, particularly Bextra, for off-label uses not approved by the FDA. The settlement includes a criminal fine of $1.195 billion, the largest criminal fine ever imposed. Off-label marketing poses risks to public health because medical providers may lack complete information about a drug's risks and benefits. The investigation, lasting four years, implicated Pfizer and identified senior managers responsible for the fraud.

Pfizer produced an ad for COVID boosters without required disclaimers. FDA and CDC were aware but took no action. FDA director Peter Marks made unapproved claims in 41 videos. No exceptions permit regulatory agencies to violate regulations or laws.

Maddy DeGary, a participant in Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine trial for 12 to 15-year-olds, suffered serious injuries post-vaccination. Pfizer initially downplayed her condition as abdominal pain, misleading the FDA. Despite being wealthy, only after an email to FDA officials did Pfizer admit to DeGary's injuries. FDA's response was lackluster, showing no concern for Pfizer's misconduct. The failure to report all adverse events corrupts the trial process, with no repercussions for Pfizer's actions.

Kansas is filing a civil suit against Pfizer under the Kansas Consumer Protection Act for misleading marketing of its COVID-19 vaccine. This lawsuit, part of a multistate initiative, highlights several deceptive claims made by Pfizer. Key allegations include misrepresenting the vaccine's safety for pregnant women, downplaying the connection to heart conditions like myocarditis, overstating effectiveness against variants, and falsely claiming it prevented transmission. Additionally, Pfizer coordinated with social media to censor criticism of its vaccine. Despite federal immunity from tort suits, Pfizer is still accountable for misleading marketing practices. The suit aims to hold Pfizer accountable for its actions, which contributed to the distribution of over 3.3 million vaccine doses in Kansas.

Four companies, Pfizer, Merck, Blackstone, and Sanofi, are responsible for producing all 72 vaccines. However, these companies have a history of criminal activity, collectively paying $35 billion in fines for falsifying science, defrauding regulators, lying to doctors, and causing the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people. For instance, Merck's product, Vioxx, was sold as a headache pill but caused heart attacks and killed around 120,500 Americans. Despite this, they only paid fines and faced no jail time. It is hard to believe that these companies, known for lying and cheating, are honest when it comes to vaccines. The vaccine industry is immune to lawsuits, making it the perfect place for these companies to avoid consequences.

Speaker 1 questions the trustworthiness of Pfizer due to their history of criminal fines and unethical practices. They ask how it is considered anti-science to question a company that has been caught bribing physicians and manipulating test results, resulting in a $2.3 billion fine. Speaker 0 acknowledges the comment but asks to continue the presentation before addressing the questions. Speaker 1 insists that their questions won't be answered and mentions having four questions. Speaker 0 tries to locate a lost ring. The transcript ends abruptly.

Pfizer was fined $4.66 billion for various healthcare, public market, safety, competition, and environmental violations. They also faced penalties for promoting unapproved medical products, making false statements, and violating drug and medical equipment security. Johnson & Johnson, on the other hand, was fined $4.248 billion for healthcare, public market, safety, competition, consumer protection, unapproved products, false statements, foreign corruption, and anti-competitive practices.

Kansas is filing a civil suit against Pfizer under the Kansas Consumer Protection Act, seeking penalties and damages for misleading marketing of its COVID-19 vaccine. This lawsuit is part of a multistate effort involving five states. The complaint details several misleading claims, including that the vaccine was safe for pregnant women despite evidence of adverse events and miscarriages. Pfizer also denied links between its vaccine and heart conditions like myocarditis, despite known risks. Additionally, Pfizer claimed its vaccine was effective against variants and could stop transmission, but later admitted it had not studied transmission. The suit emphasizes that Pfizer's misleading statements contributed to its vaccine's success in Kansas, where over 3.3 million doses were administered. The case focuses on marketing practices, asserting that Pfizer's actions violated its obligation to provide truthful information.

Kansas is suing Pfizer for deceptive marketing of its COVID-19 vaccine, violating previous agreements. Pfizer misled on safety for pregnant women, heart conditions, variant protection, and transmission. They censored criticism and avoided government oversight. Despite this, Pfizer delivered over 3.3 million doses in Kansas. This lawsuit is the first of a potential multistate effort.

Speaker 0: I find information like this, you know, inserts for the vaccine. Paper's there, and there's nothing printed on it. I find that very interesting, disheartening, disgusting, and lots of other words, but then it gets better. It just keep wait. There's more. It just keeps happening. The CDC redacts every single word of a 148 page study on a myocarditis after COVID vaccination. So I asked research to print the study for me. 148 pages. The entire thing is redacted. What good does a study do if there's nothing there? Then I wanna know, wait, what might have been there that they needed to redact it? That's even scarier. Speaker 1: We're witnessing an active cover up of a colossal consumer product safety debacle that is is basically affecting the entire world. Mhmm. So in The United States, our CDC, National Institutes of Health, and the FDA are actively involved in a cover up. And the same is occurring in The UK with the MHRA, Europe with European medicine agencies, and Australia with the Therapeutic Goods Administration. Something is going on that's very big. Each one of these companies that puts out a product has an obligation to produce ninety days of safety monitoring after their product comes out. It's a regulatory dossier. If somebody has a problem with the new product and they call the company like Pfizer, Pfizer has to report, write down what happened, and they have to collate that in a report and produce it and make it publicly available. When it came to ninety days with Pfizer, the first vaccine that came out, remember Pfizer was approved 12/10/2020. Pfizer didn't produce the report. And then people started asking, well, what's happening with your vaccine? And Pfizer would not disclose what happened. And then it went to court. And the lawyer for the FDA stepped in and said they don't wanna release Pfizer's dossier for fifty five years. Mhmm. Oh. Fifty five years. And the the the plaintiff pushed. And finally, slowly, the Pfizer dossier came out. Pfizer recorded one thousand two hundred and twenty three deaths with their product within ninety days of release. People were calling Pfizer in desperation watching their family members die after taking the vaccine. Pfizer recorded over twelve hundred new adverse events, new problems that doctor Boden has talked to you about that we are grappling with the entire time. But the point is our FDA worked to cover this up. The FDA should be regulating this company. FDA should have been having at least monthly meetings and fully disclosing what was going on with these novel vaccines, which are a genetic transfer technology platform.

A recent study suggests that Pfizer may have excluded known deaths in the vaccine arm of its clinical trial from its data filing with the FDA in 2020. The study also found that trial subjects vaccinated with Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine experienced a significant increase in cardiovascular deaths compared to placebo controls. This information was not disclosed by Pfizer when the FDA was evaluating the vaccine for emergency use. Additionally, researchers identified instances where Pfizer attributed potential vaccine-associated deaths to other causes, undermining vaccine safety data. The data presented to the FDA prior to the authorization of Pfizer's vaccine did not include all the deaths that occurred during the trial. The speaker raises concerns about the prioritization of profit over lives and warns against trusting Big Pharma.

Pfizer marketed its vaccine as safe for pregnant women, but reports showed adverse events and miscarriages. They denied a link between their vaccine and heart conditions, despite evidence. Pfizer claimed effectiveness against variants, but data showed otherwise. They also misled about transmission and censored criticism on social media. Pfizer avoided government oversight in vaccine development. Despite these issues, Pfizer successfully marketed their vaccine in Kansas. Multiple states are filing suits against Pfizer.

The speaker claims Pfizer committed the greatest crime against humanity in recorded history due to the scale and foreknowledge of harm. They state Pfizer knew within three months of rollout that 1,225 people had died. The speaker alleges that by April 2021, Pfizer knew the injections were damaging minors' hearts, citing warnings from the Israeli health ministry and a pediatric group. Instead of informing the public, the speaker claims Pfizer held a "freak out conference" to plan how to lie to the American people, creating a 17-page script. This was allegedly followed by a summer-long propaganda campaign using influencers and TikTok personalities to promote injections among young people and teenagers.

Pfizer, a pharmaceutical company, created a shell company called Pharmacia and Upjohn Company Incorporated to protect itself legally. This shell company took the blame in a kickback case and was excluded from Medicare. Later, when Pfizer faced trouble, the shell company pleaded guilty again. Despite paying a large fine and settling civil suits, critics argue that the punishment is not enough to deter illegal activities. Pfizer claims to have implemented measures to prevent future wrongdoing, but skeptics believe that without significant consequences like prison sentences or bans on selling drugs to Medicare or Medicaid, the company will continue its questionable practices.

Vaccines generate significant profits for companies. Adding just one vaccine to the infant child schedule can result in $1 billion in annual sales. The widespread COVID-19 vaccination has been highly lucrative for Pfizer, earning them $54 billion in 1.5 years. Moderna, on the other hand, made $56 billion, while Moderna made $34 billion during the same period.

Pfizer, a company too big to fail, made a deal with the government to avoid being excluded from Medicare and Medicaid. They created a shell company, Pharmacia and Upjohn Company Incorporated, to take the blame for any convictions. This allowed Pfizer to continue doing business with the federal government. Despite paying a $1.2 billion criminal fine and settling civil suits for $1 billion, Pfizer's punishment may not be enough to deter other big pharma companies from engaging in illegal activities. The fear is that dealing with the Department of Justice is just seen as a cost of doing business.

Pharmaceutical companies like Merck, Sanofi, Pfizer, and Glaxo have paid billions in penalties for dishonest practices, resulting in harm and deaths. The opioid crisis and Vioxx are examples of collusion between pharma and regulators, leading to thousands of deaths. Regulatory agencies have become puppets for the industry, depriving the public of informed consent.

Pfizer is being sued for defrauding the government, but they claim they did not commit fraud. They argue they provided what the government requested, even if it was a faulty product distributed worldwide. This information is crucial and not widely known.

Pfizer knew their failed coronavirus modifications were dangerous, causing heart issues and death in animals. There is extensive literature, including patents and scientific publications, showing that they knew the heart was the target. The mRNA shots using pseudo uridine were known to generate tumors and rapid cancers. Remdesivir, with a 53% mortality rate, was chosen by the FDA as a COVID treatment, despite being deemed unethical by the World Health Organization due to its high death rate. The definition of adverse events was changed to exclude any causal link, allowing them to deny any negative effects. Data on these injections won't be published for another four and a half years.