TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Investigations into the family were obstructed, raising suspicions about the timing of pardons issued just before the end of the Biden administration. The pardons appear questionable, especially Fauci's, which is backdated to 2014, coinciding with the start of gain-of-function research. This connection raises doubts about the origins of COVID-19 and suggests further investigation is needed. The pardons for Milley, Cheney, and Kinzinger are also puzzling, and it's crucial to determine if they lobbied for these pardons or if any financial exchanges occurred, given the Biden family's history of potential bribery.

The most destabilizing act in recent years was Attorney General Garland's decision to criminally prosecute a former president based on questionable facts and untested legal theories. This unprecedented move occurred after the former president announced his candidacy against Garland's boss. Such actions could encourage ambitious prosecutors to target political opponents, potentially leading to charges against President Biden's associates. It's crucial to identify and remove those who misuse their power while promoting fairness and evidence-based actions. The focus should be on restoring legitimacy to the Department of Justice and resisting the temptation for retaliatory measures.

Judicial Watch has filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the Department of Justice for details about a meeting between Attorney General Merrick Garland and General Mark Milley, where they reportedly discussed President Trump. Milley allegedly pressured Garland to investigate far-right militia groups, a meeting described as unusual by journalist Bob Woodward in his book, War. Judicial Watch's lawsuit follows the DOJ's failure to respond to a FOIA request regarding this meeting. Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton stated that the meeting highlights the Biden administration's conflict with constitutional principles and the DOJ's disregard for transparency. Additionally, President Biden is reportedly considering granting General Milley a preemptive pardon similar to that of his son, Hunter.

General Mark Milley is being targeted for removal through the 25th amendment or impeachment because individuals, including some with special forces and Antifa ties, allegedly took Pelosi's laptop on Wednesday. The data on the laptop is causing fear among officials, despite only having a short time left in office. There are also claims of a source providing damaging information.

President Biden issued pardons to members of the January 6th committee, which you were part of. This came after President Trump suggested the committee should face jail time. You previously expressed that you did not want a pardon and communicated this to the White House. Now that you’ve received one, are you considering accepting it or seeking legal recourse? We are evaluating the situation, but it’s unclear what can be done since the pardons apply to the entire committee. This is unprecedented territory. We’ve operated collectively, and the law regarding such pardons is ambiguous. It seems likely we’ll have to accept the pardon unless there’s an attempt to prosecute the committee.

General Milley, the military's top officer, has been accused of using an intelligence platform called Data Miner to uncover information about potential threats to the United States Capitol and members of Congress. However, he allegedly failed to inform everyone who should have been notified, including the speaker. This raises concerns about the duty to warn and the need for necessary action to be taken. The details were revealed by investigative reporter Carol Leonning in her book.

The January 6th pardons are unacceptable. Notably, President Trump is the only U.S. president to veto a defense bill, which he did in 2020. His reason? He opposed removing Confederate names from military bases, claiming it was a rewriting of history. Recently, he ordered the removal of General Milley's portrait from the joint chiefs of staff wall, which seems contradictory. This raises concerns about what a second term under him would look like and whether it would pose challenges.

The nation cannot move forward unless senior people are held accountable, starting with Obama. While a former president may not be imprisoned, John Brennan, Jim Clapper, and Susan Rice should be questioned under oath about who directed them, with the threat of prison for treason. Treason is the only thing that cannot overcome a pardon. The speaker claims the outgoing Obama administration committed treason through a conspiracy to undermine a duly elected president, which hasn't stopped. Mueller and Weisman would have charged the speaker with treason if it were true. The speaker claims treason was committed against him, as a national security advisor, by the outgoing administration.

The weaponization of the justice department is concerning. Under Joe Biden, the department suggested that traditional Catholics could be considered domestic terrorists and indicated that individuals protesting school board policies might be investigated for terrorism. This politicization of the justice department is alarming, and we should not exacerbate the situation by allowing anyone appointed to the federal government to demand a pardon upfront. This could lead to a troubling precedent where appointments come with the expectation of immunity alongside a salary.

The weak strategic leadership of the 25-year-old staffers in the White House over the past four years is concerning. Lloyd Austin's performance is disappointing, and former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mark Milley, should be recalled to active duty and court-martialed for his actions in Afghanistan.

Secretary Austin, are you confident in President Biden's mental capacity? Why are military members being discharged for not getting vaccinated while Hamas supporters like Aaron Bushnell are allowed to stay?

There is a constitutional crisis as Congress is being treated unequally. Biden's mental fitness is questioned. What is on the tapes that Garland would risk criminality to protect the president, defying two congressional subpoenas? Other Americans would be jailed for this.

Biden recently pardoned Mark Milley, Dr. Fauci, and the January 6 committee, which was illegally formed and manipulated evidence. Milley allegedly assured the Chinese general that he had control over nuclear codes, while Fauci misled Congress about gain-of-function research. These actions protect key figures in a larger power structure. Trump is determined to confront these threats, as they have attempted to undermine him. The globalist agenda is increasingly being recognized as deceitful, and the public is growing frustrated. It's crucial to inform the left that their influence is waning. As they continue their destructive behavior, it fuels resistance against their globalist system. The fight against this agenda must continue, and there is a call to dismantle it entirely.

The IRS and the Justice Department are accused of interfering in the 2020 election to protect Hunter Biden. This alleged interference continues as they are now working to shield Hunter Biden and indirectly Joe Biden in preparation for the 2024 election.

Has anything changed? Should Merrick Garland be fired due to alleged corruption at the DOJ? I don’t believe there’s current corruption, but I worry about future corruption. Some think this is a politicized witch hunt, yet the attorney general should be held accountable. The charges against Hunter Biden seem exaggerated because of his name. But if you were the attorney general, wouldn’t you consider the implications? Let’s consult our legal expert for more insight.

Some Democratic members of Congress are preparing for the possibility of litigation. They're considering if they have the best teams possible to carry out their work. Some Republicans may say that Democrats are weaponizing the Justice Department, citing Trump's trial as an example. But in the United States, we are judged by a jury of our peers. Trump was found guilty in court on 34 felony charges. It's hard to make a partisan argument against that.

The president's lawyers are arguing in court about whether he can be charged for inciting an insurrection. They are using examples of previous presidents, such as George W. Bush and Barack Obama, to question if they could be prosecuted after their presidency. The lawyers claim that Bush lied about going to war with Iraq, while Obama's killing of an American citizen by drone is also brought up. These arguments are being presented in front of a three-judge panel in the DC appeals court. The court has not answered this question before, and it could potentially reach the Supreme Court in the future.

Mike, it wasn't surprising that Joe Biden pardoned his family at the end of his term. The Hunter Biden pardon indicated that James Biden, who was involved in Hunter's business dealings, would also be pardoned. If Hunter's activities were criminal, the new Justice Department could have pursued investigations through James. The Biden family's involvement in these deals raises concerns about potential crimes, and the pardons aim to prevent any investigations. With a pre-pardon, there’s no basis for launching an investigation, as the Justice Department would lose the ability to seize evidence or documents related to the case.

If Biden pardons Milley unlawfully, it should be challenged with a court martial. There are valid reasons for this action. Judicial Watch has initiated a lawsuit to investigate Milley's involvement in a collusive attack on our freedoms, which included a meeting with Merrick Garland.

President Harris stated that Trump would turn the US military against the American public to promote his agenda. However, the Biden-Harris administration allegedly enacted a directive two weeks ago that changes the law, making it legal for the U.S. military to use lethal force against American citizens on American soil. Under this directive, the U.S. military can legally shoot and kill Americans who engage in political protest because they disagree with White House policies. This initiative came from the Democratic party, not during the Trump administration.

The award to Liz Cheney from President Biden is inappropriate. Cheney, selected by Nancy Pelosi to lead a one-sided committee investigating January 6th, is accused of obstructing justice and tampering with witnesses. She allegedly hid evidence that could exonerate Donald Trump, including statements from his deputy chief of staff about seeking National Guard support. The push for a pardon suggests she is in legal jeopardy and should be investigated. Her award stems from her perceived assistance to Democrats, despite her unpopularity. Cheney's actions have shifted her controversial foreign policy stance from the Republican Party to the Democratic Party, which some Republicans view as a benefit.

A group of public interest organizations and lawmakers are quietly planning to prevent former President Trump from pressuring the US military to carry out his political agenda. The concern is that this could undermine civilian control of the government. The article specifically mentions Trump potentially using the military to suppress domestic protests, similar to the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement. The groups involved in this plan were also involved in previous protests against Trump. The fear is that if Trump were to win the election, these tactics would be used to destabilize his entire term and prevent him from stopping protests, even if they turned violent or occupied federal buildings. The speaker warns people to watch a movie about the Serbian revolution to understand how these tactics work.

If the evidence proves that Joe Biden and his family have been selling out America while he was vice president, there are calls for his impeachment. Some Democrats may encourage him to resign, similar to what happened with Nixon. Once he is out of office, he should be indicted for his gross criminal misconduct. The evidence is piling up and if it is consistent with the direction it seems to be headed, impeachment is necessary. Kamala Harris becoming president is not a major concern compared to the seriousness of Biden's alleged actions. The allegations are not only against the White House but also the federal police apparatus for covering up and facilitating attacks against Donald Trump.

I will ask the Justice Department and the President to address the potential threat of violence if he loses. I am concerned about right-wing groups connected to him training in the hills and planning attacks on communities.

The speaker states that military matters should not be approached politically, but that Mark Milley has become a political animal. The speaker claims they would have fired Milley immediately if they had known he spoke with the Chinese in January 2020, assuring them that the U.S. military was under control. The speaker says Milley never informed them about these conversations. The speaker concludes that Milley, along with someone else, should have left after Afghanistan.