reSee.it - Related Video Feed

She's criticized US intelligence and promoted Russian propaganda. Debbie Wasserman Schultz referred to her as likely a Russian asset. Given our military backgrounds, what are your thoughts on her? I believe she's compromised. Her support for a brutal dictator in Syria raises concerns. Russian media has labeled her a Russian asset, which is alarming. The US intelligence community has noted her troubling relationships with adversaries. My concern is that she wouldn't pass a background check.

The speaker discusses declassified documents from the Biden administration designating potential violent domestic extremists. These documents allegedly identify individuals as likely to turn to violence based on ideologies connected to opposing Biden administration policies. Examples include opposition to COVID vaccine and mask mandates, concerns about forced vaccination of children in schools, and disagreement with Biden's border policy. The speaker connects these documents, issued in December 2021, to President Biden's 2022 speech warning that Donald Trump and MAGA Republicans pose a threat to the republic. They also link it to alleged FBI directives to social media companies to censor Americans to prevent the spread of domestic violent extremism. The speaker concludes that this represents the weaponization and politicization of the intelligence community against the American people.

I feel a deep sense of betrayal upon learning that I am on the "quiet skies" list, labeled as a potential domestic terrorist by my own government. After serving in the military for over 21 years to combat Islamist terrorism, it is shocking to be targeted in this way. The Biden Harris administration's focus on domestic terrorism has led to the weaponization of institutions against Americans. The lack of transparency and accountability in these secret lists is concerning, with no explanation given for being labeled a threat. Legal action is being taken to address this unjust targeting of political opponents.

Learning about being added to the terror watch list confirmed my suspicions about political retaliation, especially after my appearance on Fox News discussing Kamala Harris. The real stress comes from wondering how the government is surveilling me and what other lists I might be on. TSA's focus seems to be on covering their tracks rather than addressing the abuse of power. This situation aims to create a chilling effect on free speech, discouraging people from expressing their views. I'm pursuing legal action to uncover the truth about these secretive watch lists and ensure accountability. We must recognize the implications of this surveillance state and take action in the upcoming elections to protect our constitutional rights.

Kamala Harris is often criticized for avoiding press interactions and sticking to scripted speeches. Her campaign promotes ambitious spending plans, including a proposed $2 trillion in new spending and universal monthly payments, which could significantly increase national debt. Harris has shifted her stance on various issues, such as fracking and gun control, leading to accusations of hypocrisy. She has faced scrutiny for her management style, with high staff turnover and claims of an abusive work environment. Despite her past as a tough prosecutor, she has changed her position on policing in response to political pressures. Harris's embrace of "woke" culture and equity over equality raises concerns about her governance approach. Ultimately, the checks on executive power established by America's founders are seen as crucial in light of the current political landscape.

The transcript claims that Tulsi Gabbard “walked into the Oval Office” and personally handed President Trump her resignation letter after her husband, Abraham Williams, was “diagnosed with an extremely rare form of bone cancer.” It quotes her letter: she “must step away from public service to be by his side,” cannot “ask him to face this fight alone” while she continues in her demanding position, and her resignation is effective June 30. The transcript says President Trump praised her publicly afterward and that “that is what happened.” It then claims that “within hours” Reuters published that the White House “had fired Gabbard,” describing her departure as “a victory for the intelligence community,” and that “the Internet exploded” with that narrative. The transcript offers explanations including that deep state and British intelligence had been “gunning for her for over a year,” that “they could not bang her,” and that “they planted fake stories.” It alleges she was banned from Iran war deliberations, was planning to run for president in 2028, and was “scheming against the president.” It also claims she was surrounded with “fake people” such as Joe Kent to argue that Netanyahu and Israel ran Trump, describing it as an operation to “poison a relationship” with President Trump and “split the MAGA coalition” ahead of the midterms. The transcript further claims that “rogue elements of the CIA and the Senate Intelligence Committee” kept firing at her, citing Katherine Harwich as writing that the CIA tracked “every keystroke on the government computers” of Gabbard’s Directors’ Initiatives Group to disband or diminish the group’s impact. It states that the group continued producing declassifications “which will result in prosecutions,” and claims her work showed Russiagate was a coordinated hoax between Barack Obama and British intelligence. It says disclosures are before a grand jury in Florida and that she opposed “the deep state conspiracy” used to impeach President Trump in 2019 and “the election rigging of 2020.” The transcript also claims she was investigating “Havana syndrome” and “directed energy attacks” that agencies have spent four years on. It states her investigations would “see the light of day before she leaves office,” and argues that the intelligence community claimed victory while her husband begins cancer treatment. Finally, it proposes “a test” for any new DNI appointment under Biden, alleging CIA and MI6 were “completely integrated, fused operationally,” and asks whether that arrangement still operates, claiming the “war” would continue using the same methods used against Tulsi Gabbard.

In 2013, Tulsi Gabbard was a celebrated freshman congresswoman and vice chair of the DNC. By 2024, she headlined CPAC, expressing concerns about democracy being undermined by political elites. Gabbard reflected on her journey, noting how the Democratic Party has shifted from its roots of civil liberties and support for working people to a party of the elite. She described her opposition to military intervention in Syria and the backlash she faced for challenging party leadership. Gabbard emphasized the importance of individual rights coming from God, warning against the dangers of a government that disregards these principles. She remains committed to advocating for freedom and security, urging others to take action against the current political climate.

The speaker says they are focused on solving the inflation crisis caused by Kamala Harris's policies. Regarding the 2020 election, the speaker believes issues should be debated peacefully in the public square, as Donald Trump has said. The speaker claims Trump said protesters should protest peacefully on January 6th. The speaker believes there is a threat to democracy in the form of censorship, Americans ending friendships over politics, and big tech silencing citizens. The speaker says Kamala Harris would rather censor people who engage in misinformation than debate them. The speaker is proud to have the endorsement of Bobby Kennedy Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard, who may not agree on every issue, but are united behind the principle of debating differences. The speaker accuses Kamala Harris of engaging in censorship at an industrial scale, which they believe is a bigger threat to democracy than what Trump said about protesting peacefully on January 6th.

They prioritize endless work for ideological and financial reasons. A notable example is Tulsi Gabbard, who, despite her liberal views, was quickly promoted to vice chair of the DNC. However, when she questioned U.S. opposition to Assad, she became an enemy to the establishment. Hillary Clinton labeled her as "the favorite of the Russians," highlighting the harsh criticism she faced from fellow Democrats. The Democratic Party is influenced by the foreign policy establishment and the military-industrial complex. They emphasize the importance of NATO and military support for Ukraine, revealing their focus on war as a source of funding. This contrasts with Trump's opposition to such conflicts.

Tulsi Gabbard has met with controversial figures and violated State Department guidelines by secretly visiting Syria to meet with Assad, who has used chemical weapons against his own people. Many view her as a potential Russian asset. Given her position, this raises serious concerns about her access to sensitive intelligence information, which could pose a risk to national security. The implications of her appointment are seen as highly irresponsible.

Tulsi Gabbard's potential access to national security information raises concerns, especially given her perceived support from Russia. Her nomination is seen as particularly damaging, more so than Matt Gaetz's. Despite her claims of being anti-war, Gabbard aligns with pro-war figures, particularly regarding Syria. Ultimately, her nomination is viewed as a pro-war stance on a global scale, similar to Donald Trump's presidency.

Kamala Harris's mother allegedly worked for the MK Ultra program, which raises concerns about Kamala's background. A journalist, Yoichi Shimatsu, claims that Kamala's upbringing was influenced by this program, suggesting she may have undergone trauma-based mind control. He argues that her behavior reflects signs of such programming, as she often displays inconsistent intelligence and personality traits. The discussion also touches on the broader implications of MK Ultra, including its historical ties to mind control experiments and the manipulation of public perception. The conversation emphasizes the need for awareness about these issues, asserting that many people are unaware of the government's dark history and ongoing psychological operations.

Tulsi Gabbard was placed on a domestic terror watch list after criticizing the Biden administration. She views it as political retaliation and a violation of her rights. Surveillance includes explosive detection teams and air marshals on her flights. Gabbard questions what other government agencies may be monitoring her. She believes this is an attempt to silence critics and calls for those responsible to be held accountable. She stresses the importance of freedom and privacy in the United States.

The speaker claims that Biden's Justice Department placed mothers on FBI and terrorist watch lists for advocating against certain school curricula. They state these mothers were labeled as terrorists for their activism. The speaker urges listeners to examine the Justice Department's actions. They then mention Biden's pardon of his son and his statement that the Justice Department has been politicized.

Hillary Clinton initiated the narrative branding Tulsi Gabbard as a Russian asset due to Gabbard's rising status in the Democratic Party. Gabbard, a combat veteran and articulate leader, began aligning with Bernie Sanders' views, which angered Clinton. This led to a rift, especially after Gabbard exposed the DNC's unfair treatment of Sanders during the 2016 nomination process. Clinton's campaign had previously fabricated claims about Donald Trump being a Russian asset, and Gabbard became another target. Gabbard's independent views, including her stance on the Ukraine-Russia conflict, were used against her, and her meeting with Bashar al-Assad further fueled the accusations. The discussion emphasizes that diplomacy often requires engaging with adversaries, not just allies.

Kamala Harris chose Tim Waltz as her running mate, a move criticized for being too radical. Waltz, a controversial figure, has been accused of allowing riots and supporting extreme policies like gender-affirming healthcare for children. Some speculate that Waltz was picked to create a sacrificial ticket by the Democratic party. The choice of Waltz has raised questions about the true intentions of the Democratic party and their strategy for the upcoming election.

Tulsi Gabbard is attending a rally in DC to support Israel and condemn antisemitism, stating people are traveling from across the country to take a stand against antisemitism and Hamas. She criticizes President Biden and Vice President Harris for not attending. Gabbard says the Democratic Party is led by Islamist apologists, which is why she left the party. Gabbard recounts an incident in New York City where pro-Hamas protesters attacked a van of Jewish people. She emphasizes the threat of Islamist terrorists, whose goal is to establish a global Islamist caliphate and destroy anyone who doesn't adhere to their radical interpretation of Islam. She says this threat needs to be taken seriously by leaders and defeated militarily and ideologically. She also comments on antisemitism on college campuses, saying students are hiding in libraries, and criticizes the White House for not denouncing or taking action to stop it.

Kamala Harris faced criticism for supporting violent riot suspects in 2020, including raising funds for legal support in Minneapolis and calling for federal law enforcement to leave Portland during riots. This raised concerns about her stance on law and order during a time of unrest.

Key national security confirmations for the Trump administration are underway in the Senate. Tulsi Gabbard's important confirmation hearing is scheduled for Thursday. Gabbard, a former congresswoman and military veteran, has been a strong advocate for truth on the House Armed Services Committee. She has shown courage by opposing her own party's impeachment efforts against President Trump and standing up to Kamala Harris during presidential debates. As the director of National Intelligence, she is expected to defend constitutional rights and challenge those promoting unnecessary wars.