TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In this video, the speaker discusses a report by Canadian scientists that examines the impact of the pandemic on overall mortality. The scientists analyzed data from various countries and found that all-cause mortality increased every time COVID-19 vaccines were deployed. They observed unprecedented peaks in mortality following the rollout of boosters in many countries, even during non-flu seasons. The study also revealed a high vaccine dose fatality rate among the elderly. The authors concluded that there is no evidence of a beneficial effect from COVID-19 vaccine rollouts in terms of reducing all-cause mortality. The report highlights similar trends in countries like India, Australia, Canada, Israel, and the United States. The speaker encourages viewers to share the report to help others make informed decisions about vaccination.

In this video, the speaker discusses a report by Canadian scientists on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccine rollout on overall death rates. The scientists analyzed data from multiple countries and found that all-cause mortality increased every time COVID-19 vaccines were deployed. They also observed unprecedented peaks in mortality following the rollout of boosters in most countries. The report states that there is no evidence of a beneficial effect from the vaccine rollouts, and no country showed improved all-cause mortality trends. The speaker urges viewers to share the report with others to help them make informed decisions about COVID-19 vaccination.

This video discusses a report by Canadian scientists that examines the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on overall mortality rates and the correlation between vaccine rollout and deaths. The scientists found that all-cause mortality increased in all countries analyzed after the deployment of COVID-19 vaccines. Additionally, there were unprecedented peaks in mortality following booster rollouts. The study also highlights that the vaccine dose fatality rate increased with age, particularly among those 90 years and older. The authors state that there is no evidence of a beneficial effect from COVID-19 vaccine rollouts in terms of all-cause mortality. The report suggests sharing this information with individuals considering vaccination.

Politicians daily reported COVID cases and deaths, but now 29,000 excess deaths raise concerns. A document blames Pfizer and Moderna vaccines for the rise in deaths. The Australian Senate rejected investigating excess deaths. Politicians pushing vaccines are accused of lying about the threat of COVID. Lockdowns were unnecessary, and the vaccine rollout was called a theater.

Dr. Menares and an interlocutor debate the science behind pediatric COVID vaccination and routine immunizations, focusing on transmission, hospitalization, and risk. - The interlocutor asks whether the COVID vaccine prevents transmission. Speaker 1 answer: the vaccine can reduce viral load in individuals who are infected, and with reduced viral load, there is reduced transmission. The interlocutor reframes, insisting that the vaccine does not prevent transmission and notes decreasing effectiveness over time, citing Omicron data showing around 16% reduction when there is a reduction. - On hospitalization for children 18 and under: Speaker 0 asserts the vaccine does not reduce hospitalization for 18-year-olds; statistics are inconclusive due to small numbers of hospitalizations in that age group (approximately 76 million people aged 18 in the country, with 183 deaths and a few thousand hospitalizations in 2020–2021; numbers have since dropped). The argument emphasizes a need to discuss the issue. - On death for children 18 and under: Speaker 0 says the vaccine does not reduce the death rate; claims there is no statistical evidence that it reduces deaths. Speaker 1 responds with a more cautious stance: “It can,” but Speaker 0 counters, calling that an insufficient answer. - The discussion references the vaccine approval process and ongoing debates in vaccine committees. The interlocutor states that when the vaccine was approved for six months and older, the discussion acknowledged no proof of reduction in hospitalization or death. The argument asserts that the justification for vaccination is based on antibody generation rather than clear hospitalization/death data. The interlocutor contends that immunology measurements (antibody production) do not necessarily justify vaccination frequency. - The core debate centers on what the science supports for vaccinating six-month-olds and the benefits versus risks. The interlocutor argues there is no hospitalization or death benefit for vaccination in this age group, and notes a known risk of myocarditis in younger populations, estimated somewhere between six and ten per ten thousand, which the interlocutor claims is greater than the risk of hospitalization or death being measurable. - The exchange then shifts to changing the childhood vaccine schedule, particularly the hepatitis B vaccine given to newborns when the mother is not hepatitis B positive. The interlocutor asks for the medical or scientific reason to give a hepatitis B vaccine to a newborn with an uninfected mother, arguing that the discussion should focus on whether to change the schedule rather than declaring all vaccines as good or bad. - Speaker 1 says they agreed with considering the science and would not pre-commit to approving all ACIP recommendations without the science. Speaker 0 disagrees, asserting their position that the debate should center on the medical rationale for these specific vaccines and schedules, not on a blanket endorsement of vaccines. - Throughout, the dialogue emphasizes examining the medical reasons and evidence for specific vaccines and schedules, rather than broad generalizations about vaccines.

Speaker 0: Take the shot and protect yourself and the people around you. We all feel a chill when we hear that. Mrs. van der Hof from the RIVM, you’ve researched the effects of vaccination. If you look under the line, has it had any usefulness? Speaker 1: It has certainly been useful. In fact, from our research, but also from many other studies, people who were vaccinated had a lower chance of dying from COVID, and we see that effect with every shot that’s given. We also studied whether there is a higher chance of dying from diseases other than COVID shortly after vaccination, to see whether there is vaccine harm, and we do not find that either, which is also in line with what is found internationally. Speaker 0: Okay, because that is the story you hear at the dinner table. Earlier this week someone said, I see so many people dying, there must be something. Speaker 1: Yes. Well, there are certainly people who have died due to the vaccination. We cannot deny that. That has been investigated; we find that in the Netherlands through Lareb, and we find that internationally as well. You just have to weigh the very small chance that you become ill or die from a vaccination against the chance that you become very ill or die from COVID. And the balance tips toward vaccination. Speaker 0: Yes, vaccination protects more than it harms, you just said. Also, have you studied the chance of death due to vaccination? Speaker 1: Well, we looked at people who were vaccinated and whether within 2 months after vaccination they had an increased chance of dying from anything other than COVID. If there were an indication there, we would see it, and we absolutely do not find that. Speaker 0: No, that is simply not found. Okay. Mrs. Van der Broek, and the pandemic was a priority.

The speaker claims that the COVID vaccine is toxic and could have caused the deaths of 17 million people worldwide. They suggest that there is a temporary increase in all-cause mortality following vaccine rollouts, which is consistent across different countries. Another speaker points out that normally, deaths decrease in the summer, but during the vaccine campaign, there are spikes in mortality, even in the Southern Hemisphere where it should be low. They mention that this pattern is seen during booster rollouts as well. This phenomenon is described as unprecedented.

A whistleblower provided access to 5 million confidential New Zealand government vaccination records. Analysis showed that the mortality rate in New Zealand increased for 5 months after vaccination, regardless of the time of year. The rate of mortality increase also rose with each subsequent booster. The chances of this excess being random and not caused by the experimental vaccines were calculated at 1 in 100 billion. The speaker requested the government to suspend the mRNA vaccines to prevent further harm. However, Speaker 1 disagreed, stating that over 120,000 deaths were prevented by COVID vaccines in England. The report mentioned by the first speaker has been debunked globally, as adverse events after vaccination do not necessarily mean they were caused by the vaccine.

The speaker claims that the vaccine is toxic and could have caused the deaths of 17 million people worldwide. They argue that after each vaccine rollout, there is a temporary increase in overall mortality. This pattern is observed consistently across countries with sufficient data. Another speaker points out that typically, deaths decrease in the summer and increase in the winter, but during the COVID vaccine campaign, there are spikes in mortality right after the campaigns, even in the summer. They mention that this pattern is seen in both the northern and southern hemispheres. The speakers emphasize that this is a new phenomenon.

In a Japanese study of 20,000,000 people, they could determine vaccine status and found "highly significant that all the excess deaths were in the vaccinated group, that the non vaccinated group had none." Last week, "a study of twenty minute million people. 22,000,000 people. Yeah. Yeah. It's not a bad study." An Australian statistician's paper reportedly shows that "about three months after every splurge of a vaccine booster, mortality went up," with "the peak mortality was a hundred days after the after vaccine vaccination." This timing aligns with the Japanese finding. There’s mention of an Australian government inquiry into excess deaths that "said there's nothing in it." "That's all due to COVID."

In this video, the speaker discusses the mortality rates in New Zealand from 2012 to 2022. They highlight the increase in deaths, particularly after the vaccine rollout in 2022. The speaker mentions that the spikes in deaths are usually due to the winter flu season. They also show a heat map of the top 20 sites with excess mortality rates, with 10 of them located in Christchurch. The speaker claims to be the only database administrator with access to this data in New Zealand due to the country's small size and good IT infrastructure.

The Australian government is accused of suppressing COVID vaccine adverse reactions and deaths. Excess deaths in 2022 are around 26,000, but no questions are being asked. Doctors are not reporting adverse effects or deaths, with only 14 deaths officially attributed to the vaccine out of over 1,000 reported. Doctors fear losing their livelihoods if they report accurately. The spike in deaths after COVID was attributed to the vaccine, leading to anger over the situation.

In this video, the speaker discusses the COVID situation in Australia. They mention that despite a high vaccination rate, over half the country has contracted COVID. They also talk about excess deaths in 2021 and a high number of vaccine injuries. The speaker criticizes the Australian health department for not addressing these issues and accuses the head of the organization of having a conflict of interest due to funding from Big Pharma. They also mention that the chief health officer hadn't read a report on the Pfizer vaccine.

The speaker claims that the vaccine is toxic and could have killed 17 million people worldwide. They argue that after each booster rollout, there is a peak in all cause mortality, which is consistently observed across different countries. Another speaker points out that normally, deaths decrease in the summer, but during the COVID vaccine campaign, there are spikes in mortality right after vaccine campaigns, even in the Southern Hemisphere where it should be a low death period. They mention that this pattern is seen in all 17 countries they studied. Overall, they emphasize that these observations are unprecedented.

In this video, the speaker discusses the significant excess mortality following the COVID-19 pandemic and questions the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines. They argue that the excess mortality is correlated with the vaccination campaigns and call for independent investigations into the relationship between the vaccines and the excess deaths. The speaker criticizes other political parties for promoting and embracing the vaccines without addressing the concerns raised by their party. Another speaker responds by defending their party's stance on vaccinations and arguing against the speaker's accusations. The debate becomes heated as both speakers exchange arguments and counter-arguments. The video ends with the announcement of a suspension until the minister speaks.

The video discusses a study on all-cause mortality during the pandemic in multiple countries. Researchers found a correlation between COVID-19 vaccine rollout and increased deaths, especially among the elderly. The report highlighted peaks in mortality coinciding with booster campaigns, with no evidence of vaccines saving lives. Countries like India, Australia, Canada, Israel, and the US showed similar trends. The US saw excess deaths in the 25-64 age group during vaccine campaigns. The study urges people to consider this data before deciding on COVID-19 vaccination. Stay informed and healthy.

The speaker claims that aligning deaths in the vaccine trial to intervention arms shows the vaccine was never life-saving. They allege that at the time of vaccine approval, there were more deaths in the vaccinated arm, but four deaths in the vaccinated arm within the data reporting period were not publicly announced. The speaker states that loved ones of two patients called the clinical site on the day of their death. They felt it was their ethical duty to inform the TGA and Ken Paxton about these hidden deaths. Publicly available data stated four deaths in the placebo arm and two in the vaccine arm. The speaker questions delays in reporting deaths, noting discrepancies in reporting rates between the vaccinated and placebo arms. The speaker wrote to Professor Tony Lawler of the TGA, who allegedly stated there were no hidden deaths and that no deaths in the vaccine arm were due to the vaccine. The speaker highlights that out of 38 total deaths in the six-month period (21 vaccinated, 17 placebo), only seven autopsies were done. Ten of the 21 deaths in the vaccinated arm were categorized as sudden adult death, with some individuals found dead shortly after vaccination.

Professor Lawler stated there were no breaches of good clinical practice and no hidden deaths in the Pfizer trial, also claiming that none of the deaths were attributed to the vaccine and the initial conclusions remain valid. In response, the speaker says they reanalyzed the data and found more deaths in the vaccinated arm (21) compared to the placebo arm (17). In the vaccinated arm, 10 deaths were categorized as sudden adult death or found dead, but only two had autopsies. One autopsy result is available and showed sudden cardiac death. The other is still pending. The speaker questions how it can be stated that deaths are not due to the vaccine when autopsy results are pending or not performed, especially in cases of sudden death. The speaker has repeatedly asked the TGA for the evidentiary basis for the statement that none of the deaths were due to the vaccine, but has not received a reply.

The speaker claims that based on the number of vaccine doses administered worldwide, they have calculated the toxicity of the vaccine and believe it would have killed 17 million people. They also mention a correlation between booster rollouts and an increase in all-cause mortality, which they observe in multiple countries. Another speaker adds that typically, deaths increase in winter and decrease in summer, but during the COVID vaccine campaign, there are spikes in mortality right after vaccine campaigns, even in the summer. They note this pattern globally, including in the Southern Hemisphere. This phenomenon is described as unusual and unprecedented.

The speaker claims that the COVID vaccine is toxic and could have caused the deaths of 17 million people worldwide. They argue that after each vaccine rollout, there is a temporary increase in all-cause mortality. This pattern is observed consistently across countries with sufficient data. Another speaker points out that normally, deaths decrease in the summer, but during the COVID vaccine campaign, there are spikes in mortality. This is especially evident in the southern hemisphere, where there should be a low death period. The speakers conclude that this is a new phenomenon and it occurs globally during booster rollouts.

Speaker 1 shares updated data on excess deaths in the UK, specifically among children aged 1 to 14. Before the vaccine rollout, excess deaths were decreasing due to lockdowns and school closures. However, after the introduction of vaccines, excess deaths started to rise. The numbers show a correlation of 94% between the vaccine rollout and the increase in excess deaths. It is important to note that correlation does not imply causation, but further investigation is needed. The speaker questions why COVID-related deaths did not appear in 2020 and 2021 but only after vaccination. The data presented in the video indicates a worsening situation since the speaker's book was published.

Professor Skerritt asked when the TGA first became aware that two Australian children, aged seven and nine, died of cardiac arrests directly after receiving a COVID vaccination. Senator responded that there are a number of reports of deaths of people of all ages temporally related to vaccination or not related to vaccination, and that the two specific reports were received in the adverse event notification database. They were unable to obtain sufficient information to assess these particular cases in detail, but the information available indicated they were associated with a heart attack, which is not a known adverse event of any of the COVID vaccines. Professor Skerritt pressed, asking if cardiac arrest is not an associated adverse event of vaccination. Senator clarified the point, and Professor Skerritt noted that there are two notes for file relating to both incidents obtained via freedom of information, which appear to draw a conclusion that they were a result of the COVID vaccination. Senator replied that this was incorrect, stating that if they were a result of vaccination, an announcement would have been made, and they were not concluded to be associated. Professor Skerritt then asked, in effect, how often seven- and nine-year-olds die of cardiac arrest. Senator answered that, unfortunately, it is not as uncommon as people might think. In summary, the discussion centers on whether two pediatric deaths occurring shortly after COVID vaccination were causally linked according to the TGA, the availability and interpretation of data from adverse event reports and FOI notes, and the assertion that a death attributed to vaccination would have prompted an official announcement. The conversation also highlights the point that cardiac arrest in young children, while not common, is not as rare as some might assume.

The speaker expresses concern about claims of excess deaths in New Zealand due to the COVID-19 vaccine. They bring in Helen Petosas Harris, an associate professor at Auckland University and co-director of the Global Vaccine Data Network, to provide expert answers. Helen states that there are 4 probable deaths attributed to the vaccine in New Zealand. The speaker mentions specific cases of individuals who died after receiving the vaccine. They discuss the lack of investigation into these deaths and the number of adverse events reported. Helen reassures that the vaccine is safe based on scientific information and data. The conversation ends with a mention of the Global Vaccine Data Network's purpose to combat vaccine hesitancy.

The speaker discusses the increase in mortality rates after the vaccine rollout in Australia. They point out a peak in mortality during the country's summer, which coincides with the sudden rollout of the third dose of the vaccine. The same pattern is observed in different states of Australia. The speaker then mentions a vaccine equity program in Mississippi, where the most vulnerable people were vaccinated. This program resulted in a significant increase in cumulative doses given and a corresponding peak in mortality rates for individuals aged 25 to 64 in poor states across the United States, such as Alabama.

In this video, the speaker discusses various concerns related to COVID-19 in Australia. They mention the high number of cases despite vaccination efforts and criticize the Australian health department for not addressing the issue. The speaker also highlights the excess deaths in 2021 and the significant number of vaccine injuries reported. They question the transparency of the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and accuse Professor Skerritt, the head of the organization, of having a conflict of interest due to funding from Big Pharma. The speaker criticizes the lack of knowledge among health officials and emphasizes the importance of being properly informed and not coerced into taking vaccines according to Australian law.