reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Members of the German Bundestag will vote on five proposals regarding a general vaccination mandate. However, it is important to consider the following points. The Covid-19 vaccines are not safe, as the Paul Ehrlich Institute has received more relevant side effect reports in the past twelve months than for all other vaccines in the last twenty years combined. Additionally, these vaccines no longer provide significant self-protection or protection against the Omicron variant. Therefore, they are only beneficial for certain high-risk patients. Overall, this means that a vaccination mandate is unnecessary, inappropriate, and unconstitutional. Every patient should have the right to freely decide for or against vaccination after receiving individual counseling.

The video features various speakers discussing their experiences and concerns regarding the COVID-19 pandemic and the vaccine rollout. They express skepticism about the handling of the pandemic, including the lack of early treatment options and the focus on fear and isolation. They also raise concerns about the safety and efficacy of the vaccines, citing reports of adverse reactions and deaths. The speakers argue for the need to reevaluate the vaccine rollout and prioritize informed consent and individual choice. They criticize the censorship of medical professionals and the suppression of alternative viewpoints. Overall, they believe there is a larger agenda at play and urge people to wake up to the truth. (150 words)

In this video, the speaker discusses the release of unredacted RKI protocols by Multipolar Magazine, which reveals that the lockdown measures were not based on scientific evidence but on political instructions. The speaker criticizes the mainstream media for their lack of interest in this issue and accuses them of being complicit in promoting government measures without questioning their effectiveness. The speaker also highlights the negative consequences of the lockdowns, such as increased child mortality and the neglect of other healthcare needs. The video concludes with a call for accountability and legal action against those responsible. The transcript is in German.

The video discusses various aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the measures taken to combat it. It mentions the need for intensive work to protect the entire world from the virus and the possibility of an infection surge caused by the Omicron variant. The expert council advises implementing contact restrictions, wearing FFP2 masks, and increasing testing during the holiday season. The government faces pressure to take action based on the council's recommendations, which include a potential tightening of measures. The video also touches on the debate surrounding vaccine mandates and the importance of vaccination in controlling the pandemic. It highlights the challenges faced by individuals who have experienced adverse effects from the vaccines and the need for better support and research in this area. The discussion concludes with a call for unity and a focus on finding solutions to overcome the pandemic.

The discussion revolves around the potential negative impacts of the COVID-19 vaccine, particularly on young men with myocarditis. The effectiveness of the vaccine in reducing transmission and severe outcomes is debated, with one side emphasizing its benefits and the other questioning the motives of pharmaceutical companies. The conversation highlights concerns about the vaccine's safety and the role of the government in promoting vaccination. Ultimately, the debate centers on the balance between public health and individual rights.

In this video, the speaker discusses the release of unredacted protocols from the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) regarding COVID-19 measures. The speaker criticizes mainstream media for not covering this issue and praises the Multipolar Magazine for their efforts. The speaker highlights key points from the protocols, such as the lack of evidence for FFP2 masks and the negative effects of lockdown measures. They also criticize politicians and media figures for their handling of the pandemic and the division it has caused in society. The speaker concludes by urging viewers to take legal action against those responsible.

The video discusses allegations of DNA contamination in the BioNTech Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. A private laboratory in Magdeburg found foreign DNA in all five batches of the vaccine they tested, exceeding the allowed limit. The lab's findings have raised concerns about potential genetic damage. However, the vaccine manufacturer denies the allegations. Some scientists believe that the presence of foreign DNA in vaccines may not be harmful, while others consider negative consequences possible. The Paul Ehrlich Institute, responsible for vaccine safety, does not independently test for DNA contamination and relies on the manufacturers' protocols. The debate surrounding DNA contamination in vaccines remains unresolved, and further independent analysis is needed for conclusive answers.

In this video, the speaker discusses the newly discovered evidence that implicates the White House in the decision-making process regarding the COVID-19 injections. The evidence, obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, reveals redacted documents that suggest the involvement of senior White House advisors. The documents pertain to discussions about thrombotic thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) and myocarditis, both serious side effects of the injections. The speaker highlights the deliberate misinformation provided by Dr. Fauci and Dr. Walensky, who downplayed the risks associated with the injections. The speaker concludes that the evidence proves the White House's knowledge of the harmful effects of the injections and their subsequent cover-up.

Willem Engel, a pharmaceutical scientist and human rights activist, discusses the concerns and safety issues surrounding COVID vaccines. He criticizes the spread of misinformation by governments and the lack of accurate registration of vaccine risks. He questions the validity of informed consent when crucial information is not shared with the public. Another speaker highlights the patterns of adverse reactions in different vaccine batches, suggesting that informed consent was impossible due to the unknown risks associated with each batch. The statistician presents data showing three distinct patterns of adverse reactions in different vaccine batches, indicating a concerning safety signal. The speakers call for the withdrawal of vaccine marketing authorizations and accountability for the alleged mishandling of the vaccination campaign.

Vielen Dank für die Einladung. Im Vergleich zum letzten Jahr haben wir durch einen Whistleblower in Deutschland bedeutende Daten erhalten, die die gesamte Welt beneidet. Der RKI Leak umfasst fast zehn Gigabyte ungeschwärzter Protokolle und Zusatzmaterialien, die als Beweismittel vor Gericht verwendet werden können. Diese Dokumente zeigen, dass die Coronapolitik politisch beeinflusst war. Der Bundesgesundheitsminister gab zu, dass Experten politisch beeinflusst wurden, was er zuvor bestritten hatte. Die Protokolle zeigen, dass das RKI unter politischem Druck stand und Maßnahmen oft nicht wissenschaftlich begründet waren. Zudem gab es interne Zweifel an der Wirksamkeit der Impfstoffe und an der Notwendigkeit von Lockdowns. Die veröffentlichten Informationen erschüttern die bisherigen Begründungen für die Impfpflicht und zeigen, dass die Gewaltenteilung nicht funktionierte. --- Thank you for the invitation. Compared to last year, we have received significant data through a whistleblower in Germany, envied by the entire world. The RKI leak includes nearly ten gigabytes of unredacted protocols and supplementary materials that can be used as evidence in court. These documents reveal that the COVID policies were politically influenced. The Federal Minister of Health admitted that experts were politically pressured, contradicting his earlier statements. The protocols show that the RKI operated under political pressure, and measures were often not scientifically justified. There were also internal doubts about the effectiveness of vaccines and the necessity of lockdowns. The published information undermines previous justifications for vaccine mandates and indicates a failure of the separation of powers.

The video discusses the cross-examination of a secretive government panel within Transport Canada that crafted a vaccine mandate. The panel, led by Jennifer Little, consisted of civil servants with no background in medicine or infectious diseases. Little invoked cabinet confidence when asked about who ordered the mandates, suggesting it came from senior levels of government. The video also highlights the lack of scientific recommendation for the mandate and the absence of evidence on its safety. The rationale for the mandate, if any, seems to be focused on incentivizing vaccination rather than ensuring the safety of air travel.

In this video, the speaker discusses the Pfizer vaccine trial and raises concerns about the lack of long-term data. They mention that the trial was unblinded after only 2-4 months instead of the promised 5 years, which they consider deceptive. The speaker argues that without a longer placebo-controlled trial, potential long-term effects may be missed. They also highlight the number of deaths in both the vaccine and placebo groups, stating that the vaccine group had slightly fewer deaths from COVID-19 but more deaths from all causes. The speaker concludes that the vaccine may increase the risk of cardiac arrest. They express skepticism about recommending or mandating the vaccine based on the available data.

This video discusses the lack of safety studies and transparency surrounding vaccines. It highlights the conflicts of interest within government agencies and the pharmaceutical industry, as well as the limited research on the long-term effects of vaccines. The speaker emphasizes the need for a vaxxed versus unvaxxed study to determine the safety and effectiveness of vaccines. The video calls for greater accountability and transparency in the vaccine industry to protect the health and well-being of children. (147 words)

The speakers in the video discuss various red flags and concerns regarding the COVID-19 vaccines. They highlight the importance of accurate information and informed consent for individuals deciding whether to get vaccinated. They criticize government policies and media campaigns for downplaying the risks and side effects of the vaccines. The speakers also raise concerns about the registration of adverse events and the existence of a closed database containing more serious side effects. They emphasize the need for transparency, accountability, and further investigation into the safety and long-term effects of the vaccines.

In this video, the speaker discusses the Pfizer vaccine trial and raises concerns about the lack of long-term data. They mention that the trial was unblinded after a short period of time, which they consider deceptive. The speaker also criticizes the way the vaccine's effectiveness is presented, stating that the number needed to vaccinate to save one life is 22,000. They highlight that more people died in the vaccine group compared to the placebo group, and that taking the vaccine increases the likelihood of dying from all causes and cardiac arrest. The speaker concludes by expressing their opposition to recommending or mandating the vaccine.

In this video, the speaker discusses the significant excess mortality following the COVID-19 pandemic and questions the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines. They argue that the excess mortality is correlated with the vaccination campaigns and call for independent investigations into the relationship between the vaccines and the excess deaths. The speaker criticizes other political parties for promoting and embracing the vaccines without addressing the concerns raised by their party. Another speaker responds by defending their party's stance on vaccinations and arguing against the speaker's accusations. The debate becomes heated as both speakers exchange arguments and counter-arguments. The video ends with the announcement of a suspension until the minister speaks.

There are alarming signals in the Covid situation that are concerning for the health of our citizens. Many people have chosen to get vaccinated based on information from the government and doctors, believing they made an informed decision. However, informed consent is only possible if the information provided by member states and authorities is accurate. Unfortunately, when governments spread misinformation, doctors cannot give proper advice and people cannot make an informed choice. The timeframe for recording adverse effects after vaccination is flawed, as reactions usually occur within the first 14 days. This disregards the risks and side effects that may arise during this crucial period. The government's policies and media campaigns promoting Covid vaccinations fail to consider these risks. It is essential to address these concerns promptly to ensure informed consent and protect public health.

Summary 3: The video highlights the experiences of individuals who have suffered adverse effects from the Covid-19 vaccine, expressing frustration with the lack of recognition and support from healthcare providers and the government. Concerns are raised about the safety and efficacy of the vaccines, emphasizing the need for further investigation and transparency. The vaccination of children and the changing guidelines surrounding it are also discussed. The speakers stress the importance of sharing their stories and supporting one another in the face of indifference and suffering. Additionally, the video addresses the challenges faced by individuals who advocate for honest debate and informed choices about vaccines, as they receive abuse from both pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine sides. The role of government advisory groups and the media in creating a culture of fear and stifling democratic discussion is highlighted. Overall, the video calls for open dialogue and informed decision-making to prevent further harm.

In this video, the speaker discusses the adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines and criticizes the lack of transparency and accountability in the vaccination process. They highlight the rise in serious health emergencies, the neglect of natural immunity, and the higher rate of adverse events compared to other vaccines. The speaker calls for the release of data on vaccine dosage, dates, and deaths, and expresses concern over the public's diminishing trust in health services, media, and politics. They also mention their personal sacrifices for speaking out against the vaccines and emphasize the need to challenge the powerful interests involved.

The video presents a collection of personal experiences and concerns related to COVID-19 vaccines. Some individuals advocate for vaccination, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding oneself and others. Conversely, others recount adverse reactions they have encountered after receiving the vaccine, such as heart palpitations, numbness, tingling, memory loss, and mobility issues. Instances of medical professionals dismissing vaccine-related symptoms and the call for increased transparency and accountability are also mentioned. Overall, the video showcases the diverse range of experiences and perspectives surrounding COVID-19 vaccines, including both positive and negative outcomes.

In this video, various experts discuss the risks and concerns surrounding experimental vaccines, particularly in relation to COVID-19. Professor Christian Péronne criticizes the rushed development and lack of long-term safety data for these vaccines, questioning their efficacy and safety. He highlights the importance of proper placebo-controlled studies and the need for further research on vaccine safety. Another speaker discusses the effectiveness and limitations of vaccines, emphasizing the importance of reading vaccine notices carefully and considering various factors in treatment decisions. They express concerns about the influence of pharmaceutical companies on medical research and advocate for transparency. Additionally, the impact of the HPV vaccine on reducing precancerous lesions is discussed, along with concerns about the influence of pharmaceutical companies on authorities and the lack of independent studies. The speaker calls for a reform of the World Health Organization (WHO) and expresses skepticism about the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccine. They emphasize the importance of vigilance against the suppression of freedoms and criticize the influence of big corporations.

In a video released on June 16, 2023, Dr. Christian Haffner shares the protocols of the German government's Corona Expert Council, which shed light on the experts' prioritization of their scientific ideology over citizens' well-being. The protocols reveal the council's involvement in the government's decision-making process regarding a general vaccination mandate, which was ultimately rejected by the Bundestag. The transcripts also highlight the ongoing debate on the effectiveness of measures like masks and lockdowns, as well as the importance of communication and increasing vaccination rates, particularly among children. The video further discusses the risk-benefit ratio of vaccination, potential long-term effects of myocarditis, and the need for clear and transparent communication. It emphasizes the experiences of individuals affected by the virus and the significance of reliable information. The role of experts and the government in managing the pandemic is examined, with a call for an independent commission to evaluate the measures taken. The video concludes by addressing the impact of the pandemic on society and the necessity of a global effort to combat the virus.

In this video, Dr. Peter McCullough, a cardiologist and internist, addresses the failures of the medical community and governments in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. He emphasizes the significance of early treatment and the use of virucidal nasal washes and sprays to reduce virus transmission. Dr. McCullough criticizes the lack of collaboration and comparative data among hospitals for improving treatment strategies. He also raises concerns about the effectiveness and safety of the COVID-19 vaccines, pointing out the absence of long-term studies and potential risks associated with repeated booster shots. Additionally, he discusses cases of myocarditis and heart attacks in young, healthy individuals who have received the vaccine, and criticizes the lack of investigation into these cases. Dr. McCullough highlights the denial and defense of the vaccine by some individuals, even after experiencing adverse effects. He suggests using natural supplements to help remove the spike protein from the body and emphasizes the importance of seeing patients and publishing scientific research to maintain credibility and avoid bias. Overall, Dr. McCullough argues that honesty, transparency, and collaboration are lacking in the current discourse surrounding the pandemic and vaccines.

Willem Engel, a human rights activist, and other speakers discuss the safety issues and lack of informed consent surrounding COVID vaccines. They highlight the problem of adverse events not being properly registered within the first 14 days after vaccination, leading to a false sense of security. They also raise concerns about the classification of mRNA injections as vaccines and the potential long-term side effects. The speakers present data showing different patterns of adverse reactions in different vaccine batches, indicating a lack of consistency and informed consent. They criticize the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for not taking appropriate action and call for the withdrawal of market authorizations.