reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I first stumbled across agenda 21 in about 2008, and my first reaction was to dismiss what I was reading because I didn't believe that any government in Australia would take us down this road. Then I began to see a legislative pattern emerging in parliament which concerned me greatly, and I also started to see the tenor of legislation that we were passing. I did air those concerns in parliament, and it was dismissed and ignored. The words agenda 21, ladies and gentlemen, were never meant to be spoken. And if they were, then, of course, it would be dismissed as a conspiracy theory. Because if people knew agenda 21 and what it stood for, there's plenty of information out there where they could actually learn what the end game was, and governments didn't want that to be known. My dad always said to me that people only lie for two reasons. One reason is because you're ashamed of what you're doing, and the second reason is that you don't want people to be warned just before you screw them. And I honestly believe that these secrets have been kept for both of those reasons. Ladies and gentlemen, the origins of the environmental movement as we see it began back in 1968 when the Club of Rome was formed. The Club of Rome has been described as a crisis think tank which specializes in crisis creation. The main purpose of this think tank was to formulate a crisis that would unite the world and condition us to the idea of global solutions to local problems. In a document called the first global revolution authored by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider on pages 104 and 105, it stated, in searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers, of course, will be caused by human intervention that will require a global response. That's the origin of global warming, ladies and gentlemen. In 1975, Australia agreed to bring in a new economic order via the Lima Declaration on the second conference of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization. The outcome of this was, as I said, the Lima declaration which was a blueprint for the redeployment of tools, jobs, and manufacturing to the developing nations, leaving countries like Australia short of technology, a manufacturing base, and jobs. Blind Freddy can now see what the outcome of that has been for our country with their unworkable trade and tariffs agreements hand in hand with this that have followed as a matter of course. This has now become a reality with around 90% of our agriculture and manufacturing just gone. Australia signed the Lima declaration in 1975 and hundreds of others with the support of all major political players, Whitlam, Fraser, Hawke, Keating, Houston, Howard, Rudd, the democrats, the greens, and even the Nationals. It has been put to me that all of these treaties were the foundation for the rollout of agenda 21. And it seems that Australia has been moved around the global chessboard, and our so called leaders were either complicit or naive to the long term consequences. And now we're almost at checkmate. Sorry. In 1992, former president of The United States George Bush senior said, effective execution of agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of human society unlike anything the world has ever experienced. A major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action will be integrated into individual and collective decision making at every level. Cutting through the code, I want everyone here tonight not familiar with agenda 21 to consider what the words profound reorientation of all human society and unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources actually means. For everyone here tonight not familiar with agenda 21, I would suggest that this is the beginning of your learning curve, not the end. In 1992, Morris Strong, secretary general of the UN Earth Summit and member of the Club of Rome said, it is clear the current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, ownership of motor vehicles, small electrical appliances, home and workplace air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable. Put those statements together with the previous one, and it must become clear that agenda 21 is about controlling every aspect of our lives, how we eat, what we eat, how much we eat, how we move around, food production, the amount of food, and where we even live. Dixie Ray, former Washington state governor and assistant secretary for oceans and international environmental and scientific affairs stated, agenda 21 seeks to establish a mechanism for transferring the wealth from citizens to the third world. Fear of environmental crisis would be used to create a world government and UN central direction. From a report in the September Habitat One Conference, land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument

Burning ancient carbon (coal, oil, gas) has created a wonderful quality of life for many, but this practice must stop.

Carbon dioxide is often seen as a pollutant, but I believe it is actually essential for life on Earth. It is a good thing that we are increasing its levels in the atmosphere because it was running low before. However, there is no definitive proof that CO2 is causing serious problems. As a student of science, I know that the scientific method has not been used to prove that carbon dioxide is causing global warming. In the future, people may look back and realize that the efforts to change energy policies based on cutting this gas were unnecessary. I firmly believe that the climate change hysteria is a fabrication.

Free energy has been concealed from us to control our lives. Our ancestors possessed knowledge beyond our imagination, while we currently know very little as a species.

It takes a massive amount of diesel to create concrete, steel, and transport materials using heavy machinery. The carbon footprint of these operations, along with solar panels and lithium batteries, may not be offset during their lifespan. The existing transmission lines are inadequate to power the world with electricity. We have a 120-year petroleum-based infrastructure that is essential to our lives and found in roads, car wheels, tennis rackets, lipstick, refrigerators, antihistamines, plastic products, cell phones, clothing, soap, and more. We will run out of petroleum before we find a replacement, which will kill us as a species. Oil extraction is dangerous, but we do it because we run out of options. The demand to keep pumping oil is to blame for the danger.

As an engineer and business manager, I have never found any logical scientific evidence to worry about atmospheric gases. When hydrocarbon fuels are burned, they produce carbon dioxide and water vapor. Carbon dioxide is essential for life. Two global experiments in 2009 and 2020 showed that despite reductions in human carbon dioxide emissions, the levels in the atmosphere continued to increase. This proves that humans do not have a significant impact on carbon dioxide levels, as it is controlled by nature.

Recently, I discovered something alarming - our atmosphere is now filled with Graphene oxide. People are experiencing brain fog, headaches, and respiratory issues. I used a flashlight to reveal this truth. It angers me to see the moon obscured by this deadly atmosphere. We need to wake up before more lives are lost.

Psychedelics were not made illegal due to safety concerns, but rather because they allow communication with other realities that those in power want to suppress. Imperial College in London is conducting a fascinating study on DMT, mapping this parallel world. Multiple individuals have reported similar experiences and messages from this realm. This may be the hidden reason behind the illegalization of psychedelics.

I visited an underground research facility on the Mexican American border where they are developing transdimensional medical technologies. These technologies can attach missing limbs to the subtle body and help with phantom pain. However, these same technologies could also provide free energy for homes. There are many other spin-offs in energy propulsion that could benefit humanity. I believe we need a Marshall plan for new energy and the environment, funded by individuals in an open source way. Expecting governments to support these disruptive technologies is unrealistic. We are running out of time due to the state of the biosphere and population growth. We need to take drastic measures to create change quickly.

Fossil fuels are better for the environment because without them, all the trees would have been cut down. They also save the whales because whale oil was used before fossil fuels. The climate change issue is about controlling energy resources. If everyone uses electricity, it all has to be mined, mostly by slave labor in communist countries owned by dictators. This is not necessarily better than fossil fuels, which make money for those who extract them, involving less exploitation. Scientists who say climate change is real only get grant money if they say climate change is real, while scientists who disagree with climate change have their budgets taken away and are blacklisted. Changing energy resources changes who controls the power in the world.

Achieving net zero emissions would lead to widespread hunger and disease as 50% of the population relies on nitrogen fertilizer for survival. Attempts to ban nitrogen fertilizer in countries like the Netherlands and Sri Lanka are seen as a misguided effort to save the earth, which does not necessarily need saving.

As a business manager with knowledge of atmospheric gases, I have never found any logical scientific evidence to worry about the impact of carbon dioxide. When hydrocarbon fuels are burned, they produce carbon dioxide and water vapor. Carbon dioxide is essential for life. Two global experiments in the past 14 years support this. In 2009, during the recession, carbon dioxide levels continued to increase despite reduced human use of hydrocarbon fuels. Similarly, in 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, carbon dioxide levels kept rising despite decreased human carbon dioxide output. It is clear that humans do not significantly affect the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere; it is controlled by nature.

"The colossal mistake of underestimating the death spreading agriculture and meat industry." "ecocide and a crime against humanity." "Permaculture is the real and only way to go." "Economise and replace the burning of fossil fuels as much as possible with renewable energy at least if this renewable energy is actually decreasing c o two emission and the latter is truthfully calculated." "The green agenda is a scam, based on lies and in fact is part of an illiterion agenda to take away vehicles from common people and make the common people dependent on a social credit system for among others their transport." "Pesticides kill the natural soil life just as tiling does and as such destroy the necessary base of land ecosystems." "Meat production uses easily 10 times more natural resources, poisonous pesticides and fertilizer than vegetable food production."

We've built a great quality of life for many by burning ancient carbon like coal, oil, and gas, but we need to stop.

Food prices are rising globally, and world leaders attribute it to climate change. They propose a surprising solution: shifting from beef, chicken, and pork to insects like crickets and mealworms. However, farmers have a different perspective. They believe that high food prices and shortages are not caused by global warming but by an environmental policy implemented 30 years ago called Agenda 21, now known as Agenda 2030. This policy sets 17 sustainable development goals with 169 targets to be achieved by every nation by 2030. Critics argue that these goals require excessive government control and infringe on individual freedom. The Netherlands, for example, is shutting down small and medium-sized farms to comply with the net-zero agenda.

During the prohibition, alcohol was banned because people were using it as a source of energy for their cars and homes. They would ferment food scraps to create their own alcohol, which was a renewable and easily accessible form of energy. However, the government prohibited its production and possession, claiming that it burned cleanly and would have had less harmful environmental effects. Interestingly, the elites who made these decisions continued to drink alcohol themselves. This reveals that the real reason for the prohibition was not related to the environment, but likely had financial motivations.

Speaker 0: The University of Nebraska just completed a study stating the way to save the world on carbon is to raise more cows. Cows are carbon negative; they produce more oxygen than they emit as methane and carbon. The takeaway is to eat more cheeseburgers or steaks to save the world.

I realized we are poisoning people instead of protecting them through geoengineering. Whistleblower protections are not enforced. Disinformation sites like Metabunk and Contrail Science try to debunk us. Geoengineering, funded by tax dollars, is the biggest issue we face. Overexposure to toxins from food, water, and vaccines is harming us. Our bodies can't handle these toxins.

In Saudi Arabia, you can harness the power of the ether for free and unlimited energy. However, the elites today prioritize profit over providing free energy to the people. This is why much of our history has been intentionally concealed. In today's world, it's all about profits rather than prioritizing the well-being of individuals. It's important to question everything.

I have been a supporter of green energy for years, but I was shocked to learn about the environmental and human costs of solar panels and wind turbines. The production of these technologies involves forced labor, pollution, and resource consumption. The so-called green solutions are not as ethical as they seem, and the climate change industry is driven by profit. We need to be mindful of the impact of our choices on the environment and human rights to prevent further damage.

I've been exploring lithium mining, which is crucial for the energy transition in America, especially for AI technologies that require significant electricity. The U.S. power grid struggles to support this demand, leading to the installation of large lithium-ion battery facilities. Indigenous groups have fought against lithium mining at Thacker Pass due to its toxic nature, but the Biden administration allowed it to proceed. Interestingly, I discovered a plan to convert the Hoover Dam into a giant battery, similar to how ancient pyramids were believed to generate electricity. There's a connection between Tesla, Trump, and the push for a new power grid, raising concerns about how this will transform our land and energy systems into something resembling a computer chip. The implications of this transition keep me awake at night.

There is a problem with our climate and environment, but it's not a hoax. The people claiming to save it are actually destroying it. They create weapons, cause droughts, hunger, and wars. Our food, water, and air are also affected. They call it a climate emergency, but they don't invest in healing the earth. They prevent the planet from healing itself. They manipulate our emotions to make us believe they want to help. It's the Hegelian dialectic, where they create the problem and offer a pre-planned solution.

Speaker 0: And they came up with this incredible document where they actually said we need a new justification for this all powerful state. So the new excuse is going to be because the environment is gonna be harmed and because climate is going to hurt us. Speaker 1: Wait. What? What? I could not believe what I just heard. Did world leaders really lay out this globalist plan in plain English, in a physical book way back in 1991? I went on Amazon, and there it was, the first global revolution, which states, and I quote, in searching for a common enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and the like would fit the bill. And therefore, the real enemy is humanity itself.

I've created diesel fuel from plastic waste. This isn't just any fuel; it's pure carbon, derived entirely from plastic. Because of this innovation, I've essentially built my own gas station.

As an engineer and business manager, I have never found any logical scientific evidence to worry about atmospheric gases. When hydrocarbon fuels are burned, they produce carbon dioxide and water vapor. Carbon dioxide is essential for life. Two natural experiments in 2009 and 2020 showed that despite reductions in human carbon dioxide emissions, the levels in the atmosphere continued to increase. This proves that humans do not have a significant impact on carbon dioxide levels, as it is controlled by nature.