reSee.it - Related Video Feed

President Trump increased tariff threats via social media, this time targeting Apple. The Dow dropped .6% and Apple shares fell 3% following Trump's post stating phones sold in America should be made in America. The S&P and Nasdaq also declined.

Chinese producers on social media are exposing who Trump's tariffs target: international corporations, not American consumers or Chinese producers. For example, if Nike buys shoes for $10 and sells them for $100, a 25% tariff means Nike pays $2.50 to the U.S. government per shoe. Nike's cost increases by $2.50. Even if Nike passes this cost to consumers, the price only increases to $103. Chinese producers on TikTok suggest it's better to buy directly from China, even with tariffs and shipping, for $12.50. Tariffs are not meant to hurt consumers or China, but to protect American industry from corporations prioritizing profit. Those who criticize tariffs are often the corporations and investors who benefit from these practices.

According to a report from the USTR, over 50 countries have contacted the president to start negotiations. These countries supposedly understand they bear much of the tariff burden. The speaker believes the consumer in the U.S. will not be greatly affected. The speaker claims the persistent long-run trade deficit exists because other countries have very inelastic supply and have been dumping goods into the U.S. to create jobs, such as in China.

Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi have been discussing tariffs for decades. China's repression, trade deficit, and job losses for American workers are issues. Tariffs signal to China that unfair trade policies must end, or there will be dramatic consequences. When Democrat elites want tariffs, it's accepted, but when President Trump wants tariffs, there's a double standard. Some believe everyone knew tariffs were necessary, but lacked the courage to implement them. Implementing tariffs takes guts, and the country needs to be patient. The situation is working out, possibly faster than anticipated. This is a transition to greatness for the country. People investing in the country will do better than ever before.

Chinese producers on social media are exposing who Trump's tariffs target. It's not American consumers or Chinese producers, but international corporations who have "sold out American prosperity for their own profits." Using Nike as an example, if Nike buys shoes for $10 and sells them for $100, a 25% tariff means Nike pays $2.50 to the US government per shoe. Nike's cost is now $12.50, netting them $87. If Nike passes the cost to consumers, the shoe costs $103. Chinese producers on TikTok suggest it's better to buy directly from China, even with tariffs and shipping, at $12.50 per shoe. Tariffs are not meant to hurt consumers or China, but to protect American industry from corporations that prioritize profit. Those who criticize tariffs are often the corporations and Wall Street investors who don't want Americans to realize they've been "sold out."

Trump instinctively understood that outsourcing everything was a mistake. Globalist elites believed in making things wherever it was most efficient, but they forgot that losing manufacturing means losing leverage. If we don't make things in America, we're vulnerable. It's easy to complain about tariffs, but what's the cost of allowing a dictator to destroy our economy overnight? Xi could cripple us by cutting off access and nationalizing industries. Nobody is talking about how easily Xi could destroy companies like Apple and millions of jobs with a stroke of a pen. I'm now pro-tariffs until we get our act together. We transformed into a manufacturing powerhouse during World War II in just two years; we can do it again. We also need to train a new generation in manufacturing. We should bring back defector visas, targeting critical people in hostile countries like China, offering them jobs here to weaken our adversaries.

Trump's tariffs have revealed that many designer brands are manufactured in China. The speaker states that Lululemon leggings, costing consumers $100, are made in China for only $5 to $6. The speaker believes that both Chinese manufacturers and American consumers are being exploited by these brands. The Chinese are making only a few dollars in profit, while Americans pay thousands for items costing very little to produce. The speaker concludes that Trump's tariffs have exposed this "lose-lose situation" for both the Chinese and American people.

In the 1970s, the largest share of the GDP was in the middle class, with 25% of the economy in manufacturing. Now, the top 20% controls over 50% of the GDP, with the largest share in real estate and finance. Manufacturing, which once provided a middle-class standard of living for many, is now largely done in other countries for lower wages. Tariffs aim to make American workers more competitive in the global market, but the speaker questions accepting a "race to the bottom" where countries like China have a competitive advantage due to low wages. The speaker claims that Trump identified five industries critical for national security: pharmaceuticals, lumber, steel, aluminum, and one other. The argument is that domestic manufacturing in these sectors is essential to avoid reliance on potential adversaries like China, especially in times of conflict.

Check out these insane tariffs that Canada imposed on the US last year: 250% for milk, 291% for butter, and over 200% for whey and cheese. Meanwhile, we charged them far less for the same goods. Since Trump announced tariffs, everyone suddenly became an economics expert. I don't know how tariffs will affect the economy, and neither does anyone else. But I do know tariffs led Apple to build a new factory and hire 20,000 Americans. Honda is building Civics here instead of Mexico. Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion to build five chip factories in the US. Tariffs pressure China, Mexico, and Canada to stop the flow of fentanyl. Tariffs are one tactic in an economic strategy. Are we willing to tolerate short-term disruption for long-term gain? Macroeconomics are complicated and take time to play out. Are you listening to people who want the President to fail, even if it hurts America?

A large tariff will be placed on chips and semiconductors. However, companies like Apple that are building or have committed to build in the United States will not be charged the tariff.

Ashwin Rifansi discusses New Order’s focus on how India and its allies sit at the center of a shifting global order, noting that the West Asia conflict involving Trump, Netanyahu, Iran, and Lebanon has repeatedly broken ceasefires and that Pakistan publicly thanked Trump for de-escalation efforts before its consulate in Peshawar was shut down as the US deemed the location too dangerous. New Delhi is about to host the BRICS foreign ministers meeting, with Iran likely sending its deputy foreign minister. India’s chair aims to balance Gulf energy ties with a broader multi-aligned strategy, positioning it as the broker able to keep competing sides in the same room. The last BRICS meeting failed to reach consensus; this time the stakes are higher, divisions sharper, and billions hinge on deli decisions. The question posed is whether this emergent order can hold together or reconcile internal contradictions. Professor Richard Wolff, a prominent economist, joins to discuss who pays for the Trump–Netanyahu war. Wolff identifies the cost as ultimately borne by a combination of American taxpayers and the global community that finances the war through borrowing. He says the government relies more on borrowed money than on taxes, noting that an explicit tax burden on American families would be politically unsustainable, while the bill is effectively deferred to future generations. He points out that parts of the global South are lending to the US to finance the war, citing that Japan is the largest creditor to the United States, with China as the second-largest, while the US remains the world’s largest debtor. Wolff explains that the crisis of supply lines stems from long-standing corporate decisions since the 1970s to relocate manufacturing abroad for profitability, particularly to China. He argues politicians—including Trump—present the narrative as if foreigners (China, India, Brazil) forced these changes, thereby portraying the US as a victim rather than the perpetrator. This framing disguises the revenue gains American capital reaped from overseas production, which in turn produced long supply lines as goods must travel back to markets. The discussion emphasizes the strategic political use of this narrative to manage domestic anger at lost jobs and wages. The conversation then turns to potential futures for supply chains and localized production. Wolff suggests that global factors push toward localization and diversification of production within the United States and BRICS countries, with the Hormuz Strait being a model for potential disruptions elsewhere (e.g., the Malacca Strait). He predicts a major, long-term reorganization of where production happens and how the global economy is organized, arguing the conflict could catalyze a renaissance of regionalized or localized production, even if not immediately after the current war. On the political economy side, Wolff notes that Trump’s political support is shrinking outside the extreme right and the business elite who benefit from his tax policies and fossil-fuel ties. He warns that if the Iran confrontation undermines Trump’s ability to assert U.S. power, oligarchic support could wane, threatening his presidency. Wolff also forecasts that the defense budget under discussion—proposed to rise from about $900 billion to $1.5 trillion—would far outpace any social program cuts, intensifying pressure on workers who are already relying on food stamps and other supports. The discussion touches on the global South’s response to a declining U.S. empire, including potential non-dollar settlements and the challenges of unwinding dollar-denominated debt. Wolff notes the dollar is weaker but remains central; the process toward a multi-currency system is gradual. He observes that global South students are increasingly looking elsewhere for education and investment, signaling a broader trend away from the United States as a safe or dominant hub for capital. The program closes with questions about the Quad and ASEAN’s roles, and whether India should stay in the Quad. Wolff’s perspective frames a dynamic, multi-polar trajectory as BRICS and other blocs potentially gain influence in the face of U.S. decline. The show teases a future discussion with Khan about how viewers can engage with these questions.

Chinese producers on social media are exposing who Trump's tariffs target. It's not American consumers or Chinese producers, but international corporations who have "sold out American prosperity for their own profits." Using Nike as an example, if Nike buys shoes for $10 and sells them for $100, a 25% tariff means Nike pays $2.50 to the US government per shoe. Nike's cost is now $12.50, netting them $87 per shoe. If Nike passes the cost to consumers, the shoe costs $103. Chinese producers on TikTok suggest it's better to buy directly from China, even with tariffs and shipping, costing $12.50. Tariffs are not meant to hurt consumers or China, but to protect American industry from corporations that prioritize profit. Those who complain about tariffs are investors in these companies who don't want Americans to realize they've been sold out.

Technology companies have committed over $2.5 trillion to build in America due to tariffs, with sovereign wealth funds from the Middle East also investing, totaling over $3 trillion committed. The pharma industry, auto, and industrial sectors are also returning to America. The speaker mentioned the Trump Gold Card's popularity and a plan to replace the Internal Revenue Service with an external revenue service, funded by tariffs, so outside countries trading with the U.S. pay their fair share. Ending de minimis will rebuild mom and pop and small businesses in America by stopping foreign countries from sending small packages for free.

The speaker states that the U.S. will tariff pharmaceuticals. They believe this will cause pharmaceutical companies to move back to the U.S. because the U.S. is the biggest market. The speaker asserts that the U.S.'s advantage is being the biggest market. They say a major tariff on pharmaceuticals will be announced shortly. The speaker believes that upon hearing this, pharmaceutical companies will leave China and other places because most of their product is sold in the U.S.

China has reportedly grounded Boeing as payback for Trump's tariffs, halting further deliveries of Boeing jets and purchases of aircraft equipment from US companies. China has already halted exports of critical rare earth minerals. In response to US tariffs, China insists it will persevere and expand its trade circle, even approaching India, Australia, and Saudi Arabia to form an axis against The US. China warned, "if war is what The US wants...we're ready to fight till the end." Pundits warn tariffs could eliminate 740,000 US jobs by 2025. Prices for apparel, electronics, and consumer goods will rise, and China's retaliatory tariffs jeopardize a $16 billion export market in agriculture. While tariffs incentivize re-shoring, 95% of some goods rely on Asian manufacturing, and higher import costs could exacerbate inflation. Much of what is labeled "Made in USA" or "Made in France" contains components manufactured in China. Economists warn this trade war could result in a recession.

Of course big business and Wall Street hate Trump's tariffs; they've been decimating American manufacturing for decades. These tariffs are helping to reverse that trend. We've seen companies like Milwaukee Tool, which sounds American but is owned by the Chinese Communist Party, compete against American companies. That's why we need tariffs to protect companies that actually want to manufacture in the United States. Don't believe the lies you read; polls show Americans overwhelmingly support tariffs.

Trump instinctively understood that outsourcing diminishes our leverage. Globalist elites thought making things in the most efficient economy was great, but they forgot that if we can't make anything, we're at everyone else's mercy. A dictator could destroy our economy overnight. Isn't it humiliating that our prosperity depends on Xi Jinping's goodwill? It's scary that Xi could destroy Apple or millions of US jobs with a stroke of a pen, yet nobody discusses this openly. I'm now a libertarian who supports tariffs until we get our act together. It wouldn't take long to reindustrialize; we did it rapidly during World War II. The problem is that we've disincentivized smart kids from pursuing manufacturing careers. We need "defector visas" to steal top talent from hostile nations like China, specifically targeting critical roles to weaken them and strengthen us. This isn't just about skilled immigration; it's about actively harming our adversaries.

Experts have been wrong for 40 years about the effects of shipping manufacturing and industrial bases to other countries like China and Mexico. They claimed it would lead to cheaper goods and a stronger middle class, but they were wrong about making America less self-reliant. Donald Trump recognized this and decided to bring American manufacturing back, unleash American energy, and make more goods domestically.

Technology companies have committed over $2.5 trillion to build in America due to tariffs, with sovereign wealth funds committing over $3 trillion. The pharma industry is returning home because America pays for global drug costs, and the auto and industrial sectors are also reshoring. The speaker mentioned efforts to train the workforce to rebuild America. There is significant attention on the "Trump Gold Card." The tariffs are generating hundreds of billions of dollars to build the "external revenue service," intended to replace the internal revenue service, with the goal of having foreign countries pay their fair share to America. Eliminating de minimis will help rebuild mom and pop and small businesses in America. De minimis was described as a big scam against the country and small businesses.

The president wants to impose tariffs on foreign importers to bring investment and jobs back to the U.S. Businesses can avoid tariffs by building and investing more in America and raising wages for American workers. The administration aims to lower inflation, ensure government services, and force businesses to invest in American workers. Inducing businesses to invest in American workers and reshoring supply chains will strengthen the economy long-term. The COVID crisis showed the U.S. can't rely on China for critical supplies. The president is changing a bipartisan consensus that has harmed American workers. Investing in the U.S. will be rewarded with lower taxes, regulations, and energy costs. The European Union has been tough on American workers by imposing tariffs. The president is defending the American worker and fighting back against unfairness. The U.S. has a $1 trillion trade deficit and will no longer allow Americans to go into debt to buy foreign-made goods.

Tariffs are taxes on imported goods, and the U.S. only imports 15% of its goods and services. Canada and Mexico contribute just 5% of that. This trade war could significantly impact their economies, as Canada relies on the U.S. for 20% of its GDP, with 75% of its trade tied to the U.S. If prices rise, Americans may stop buying Canadian goods, hurting their economy. Mexico is similarly vulnerable, with 40% of its GDP linked to U.S. exports. Concerns about Canada cutting off power are unfounded, as they are in significant debt. Other countries contribute only 10% to the U.S. GDP, and tariffs can be beneficial when paired with tax cuts. While there may be slight inflation, it will be manageable. America is prioritizing its interests, so there's no need for alarm.

The rich are punishing Trump for siding with the American working class over them. When someone has the courage to wage class warfare on behalf of the American working class, everyone worries about the stock market. The stock market looks the way it does because the rich are punishing Trump for siding with the neglected and humiliated American working class. It is deeply unfair for the middle class to bear the burden of unfair tariffs from other countries. These tariffs have already worked, with $1.2 trillion in manufacturing invested in the U.S. since January 21. People cannot believe there is a president working for them, putting them first, and telling Wall Street to go screw itself. Wall Street picked the Democrats for the last three election cycles.

America protects and defends countries like South Korea, Japan, Canada, and all of Europe. In exchange, South Korea steals the automobile and electronics industries, Japan closes its market to American cars, Canada runs up a massive trade deficit, and Europe has a $300 billion trade deficit with the United States. America is getting ripped off by every other country in the world, resulting in the deindustrialization of the heartland, destruction of the American dream, and the eradication of the industrial and manufacturing base needed for national security. This has to stop, especially with $36 trillion in debt.