reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The transcript describes a lawsuit involving Bill Gates that is portrayed as “getting even crazier.” It claims that in court, there were so many plaintiffs present that the court had to open an additional room because the original courtroom could not fit everyone. It further alleges that Bill Gates’ team began their speech by saying that vaccines are safe and effective, and that the entire courtroom “bursted out laughing.” As the hearing progressed, the transcript claims the plaintiffs presented evidence about deaths and other harms, including “people being barren,” heart attacks, and “turbo cancers” appearing as a direct result of the COVID vaccine. It then alleges that the plaintiffs presented evidence that Bill Gates colluded with Jeffrey Epstein to create the vaccine, “fully knowing what it’s gonna do to people.” The transcript also states that it “floored” the speaker when, during the hearing, it was said that the COVID virus was no worse than a standard flu. The speaker frames the situation as the revelation of hidden information, referencing the Bible passage that everything hidden will be revealed. They conclude by saying they will keep praying and hoping for more information to come out and for “justice” to be done, especially for people who lost loved ones and for those whose lives, businesses, and health were described as being destroyed by the vaccine, which the transcript says many were mandated to take.

The speakers express concerns about the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, alleging that they can cause harm and death. They question the transparency of vaccine trials and accuse companies of withholding crucial information. The speakers call for criminal charges against organizations for fraud and wrongful advertising, claiming that vaccines have led to deaths. They emphasize the need to stop taking vaccines and boosters immediately.

People are finally starting to see the evidence against vaccines, with new studies linking boosters to cancer. Most MPs are still supporting vaccines, but only to save face until after the upcoming election. The speaker believes the vaccine rollout is a crime against humanity, with potentially millions of deaths worldwide.

The speaker claims adverse events from the vaccine rollout were covered up and dismissed as rare and coincidental. They state that regulators approved the vaccines based on relative risk data (95%), which they describe as misleading, while the absolute risk reduction was only 0.84%, meaning 120 people had to be vaccinated to prevent one infection. The speaker alleges that Pfizer has 31 convictions, including withholding data, presenting false data, and bribing clinicians and regulators. They claim over 100 doctors have written to various health organizations, including the NHS and MHRA, about the vaccine program, but received only one response. The speaker concludes that science is dead because discussion, analysis, and debate are no longer allowed, and decisions are being made without scientific basis.

The speaker claims that an “agent’s” vaccines are “blinding the minds” of people, making them “stupid,” losing their intelligence, and that the vaccines are “killing people.” The speaker cites alleged health effects including myocarditis, strokes, heart attacks, athletes dying, and young people dying. The speaker emphasizes that the most dangerous part, according to them, is that “billions that have been injected” are “losing their minds.” They add that people are becoming “more and more controllable” because “they cannot say no.” The speaker describes the situation as “fantastic,” “brilliant,” and “nightmarish,” “horrible,” “diabolical,” and “satanic,” and says it “has got to be stopped.” The speaker argues that the brain “God gave to man” is what makes “man [be] man,” and claims that a process involves “vessels” that are very small and “clogging” them, which the speaker says “no one in the world is going to see.” They conclude by stating that Pfizer, BioNTech, and Moderna “know very well that they cannot be seen.”

The speaker claims that “the centerpiece of the Pfizer papers” is an intentional attack on human sexuality, especially women and babies. They assert that Pfizer “killed the babies” and “knew it,” “poisoned the breast milk” and “knew it,” “damaged the placentas” and “knew it,” and “lowered the sperm count” and “knew it.” They say the papers include a chart of the babies being injured and a chart of women’s menstrual cycles being disrupted. They further claim the papers concluded that “babies were dying in utero due to maternal exposure to the vaccine.” The speaker states that this document “went to Dr. Walensky,” and that Walensky then gave a press conference urging people to get a COVID vaccine before, during, or after pregnancy. The speaker describes the situation as “satanic on a massive level.” They also reference “Borla” and emphasize that, in their reading of the Pfizer papers, it is impossible to conclude otherwise regarding intent. The speaker points to “this 13 to 20% drop in live births,” and concludes that they “tried to kill us,” “tried to wipe us out,” and “tried to sterilize us.” They claim that many people died, that there will be “horrible struggles with fertility,” and that they survived while “the truth came out.”

More and more people became aware that, in a country where someone could be completely healthy, receive an injection, and drop dead the next day, figures of authority would claim there was no relation or no evidence connecting the exposure to what happened. The speaker describes this as a “big lie” and says it provided “fodder” for growing public awareness of corruption as an integral and apparently inseparable part of the government and public health infrastructure. They state that people saw the situation with their own eyes and that they personally witnessed it. The speaker also says their own medical and research training—including being a physician with a PhD in research science and training at UCLA—made what they heard and saw “obvious,” and they could not believe colleagues and other scientists sometimes “spouting” claims they viewed as creating and upholding an alternate reality about COVID-19 vaccines.

A speaker accuses the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies of being part of a criminal cartel that aims to enrich themselves while harming humanity. They claim that the WHO has a history of criminal behavior and provide evidence to support their claims. The speaker argues that the COVID-19 pandemic was planned and executed by these criminal organizations for profit and control. They highlight the funding, research, and manipulation of the virus as evidence of their criminal intent. The speaker calls for the dismantling of the WHO and condemns their actions as crimes against humanity.

Speaker 0 frames the issue as 'the corruption of science' and the 'capture of the agencies' by pharmaceutical industries, stating the goal is to restore integrity and credibility to science. Speaker 1 cites a CDC internal study: 'black boys who got the vaccine on time had a two hundred and sixty percent greater chance of getting an autism diagnosis than children who waited.' He adds that 'The chief chief scientist on that, Doctor. William Thompson, the senior said vaccine safety science at CDC, was ordered to destroy that data. And then they published it without that fact.' Finally, he asserts, 'So, you know that story. And you know of hundreds of stories like that. It happens all the time. We are being lied to by these agencies, and we're gonna change that right now.'

The speaker claims that searching the FDA website for “FDA licensed vaccines” and checking section 6.1 on vaccine insert documents will show that placebo trials “never did” occur, including for childhood vaccines. They argue that placebo trial details are included in insert materials for vaccines where the public “never got to see” certain information due to lack of informed consent, and they say experts would claim those studies were done because they rely on what the insert language indicates or what they assert based on expert testimony. The speaker further asserts that Tony Fauci lied about six-foot distancing and that “Everyone at the CDC and the regulatory agencies” lied about COVID-19 vaccine efficacy, specifically claiming the vaccine “would stop transmission” was false and that if vaccinated people contract and transmit the virus, “the virus stops with you” and they claim it “does not” stop with you. They say the FDA has “already admitted it,” and they call for people to “start asking people to show their work,” to seek evidence, and to “not trust experts any longer,” stating they have been lied to “long enough.” They express that they hope a documentary is not the last one and say they take interviews without concern about edits that could make them look “crazy,” because they believe viewers will agree. The speaker then discusses the “vaxxed versus unvaxxed study,” saying they have been addressing it “forever” and that they took a risk by agreeing to trust the study’s results if the other party published them. They say the CDC has “done this study a thousand times” in ways meant to prove vaccinators are healthier and “they can’t do it,” and they claim that results become “bad” when the study is done “the right way.” They describe an “inconvenient study” that they say is inconvenient for panelists, for the pharmaceutical industry that they say owns television stations, and for CDC leadership and HHS officials they claim were involved in “covering up the real science.” They conclude that people will “not take it anymore” and that they now have evidence “like they have never, ever had before.”

Global governments and health authorities are ignoring the data that I see, suggesting a cover-up. I believe the vaccines are the cause, but I'm open to other explanations. This is a massive mistake for humanity, as we have administered this experimental vaccine to 5 billion people without proper human testing. The 28-day trial seems fraudulent, and I suspect data fraud at Pfizer.

A speaker accuses the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies of being part of a criminal cartel that aims to enrich themselves while harming humanity. They claim that the WHO has a history of criminal behavior and provide evidence to support their claims. The speaker argues that the COVID-19 pandemic was planned and orchestrated by these criminal organizations for profit and control. They highlight the funding, research, and manipulation of the virus as evidence of their criminal intent. The speaker calls for the dismantling of the WHO and condemns their actions as crimes against humanity.

The speaker believes that there is a deliberate agenda by a group of wealthy individuals to gain control over the population. They claim that the COVID-19 pandemic is being used as a guise to push their agenda. They argue that effective treatments for the virus, such as vitamin C, D, zinc, and drugs like Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, have been banned in favor of experimental injections that they consider dangerous. They also criticize the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines, alleging that they cause harm and death. The speaker accuses organizations like the World Economic Forum, the Gates Foundation, and pharmaceutical companies of being part of this agenda. They call for indictments against all the defendants for crimes against humanity.

The speaker claims that keeping COVID-19 vaccines on the market despite increasing evidence of excess mortality amounts to mass homicide. They argue that anyone involved in the manufacturing, distribution, administration, or promotion of these vaccines, as well as those who encouraged, pressured, coerced, or threatened reprisal for their use, is complicit in a crime against humanity. They label this crime as mass negligent homicide.

The discussion questions whether SIDS is “vaccine death,” asserting that 75% of all SIDS deaths occurred within seven days of a vaccination. It references a “Polio, forty eight hour safety review trial,” described as “forty eight hours, two days,” and connects this to President Roosevelt, described as famous for having polio in a wheelchair. The speaker claims Roosevelt “had transverse myelitis” and then answers a challenge: “No way. Didn’t have polio,” adding “How can you sit here and say doctors don’t know anything about vaccines?” The response continues by arguing that doctors do not have adequate education about vaccines, stating that “a doctor is lucky if they have a half a day education on vaccines.” The speaker further says, “I have yet to find a pediatrician that can list the ingredients of any vaccines.” The argument then escalates into the claim that “They don’t know anything at all,” emphasizing certainty about doctors’ knowledge of vaccines. The speaker claims “99.5 of our children are getting a product that was tested for five days,” and states that this product is tested “for a disease they will not come in contact with until they’re an adult.” The speaker adds that, “hopefully never,” children will face situations the speaker associates with infection risk, describing those situations as “sharing heroin needles or sleeping with prostitutes.” The overall message frames the topic as revealing wrongdoing, saying, “I do believe when people see the truth on this, it will reveal everything that’s corrupt about the world that you live in.”

The speaker asserts if asked for a conspiracy theory they are certain about, their answer is root canals. They reference a YouTube video that was formerly a Netflix documentary called The Root Cause, which they say discussed a large psyop by the dental industry and big pharma aimed at damaging people's health through root canals. They claim the documentary is banned and cannot be watched in the United States; viewers must use a VPN to access it, alleging that it is prohibited by the American Dental Association, which they claim is in bed with big pharma. The speaker contends that dentists cannot discuss the topic because they would lose their licenses. The core claim is that root canals are filled with hazardous substances, specifically mercury and formaldehyde, along with “all sorts of chemicals” that disrupt meridian lines. They state that these root canals disrupt the ability to think properly. The speaker cites a figure of “thirty million plus people a year” receiving root canals and asserts that many of them become sick as a result, linking a range of health issues to root canals. They mention ADHD, cancer, memory loss, and heart failure as possible outcomes connected to root canals, implying a broad set of illnesses can be tied back and connected to the procedure. Throughout, the speaker presents the narrative as a controlled suppression of information by industry and regulatory bodies, framing the root canal practice as a systemic health hazard rather than a standard dental procedure. The emphasis is on alleging a deliberate cover-up and a correlation (or causation) between root canal treatments and significant health problems, with the suggestion that mainstream medical and dental authorities are complicit in concealing the alleged risks.

Speaker 0 argues that the world has been lied to for 110 years by a small group of criminal industrial conspirators who aim to subjugate humanity to enrich themselves, impoverish and kill others, and that the words “acceptable death rate” have become an industrial norm. They claim this is not just a political disagreement but a crime, asserting that the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies authorized to begin the process of killing human beings in the interest of advancing their goals. The speaker declares this is a criminal cartel and states they will show documents proving it, insisting this is not an allegation but something that is provable by their own words. The four-step process alleged for executing nefarious plans is: 1) they begin by planning an exercise, 2) they fund that exercise, 3) they create the rationale for what they will do, and 4) they deploy and profit from it. They claim this violates 15 U.S. code section 19 (and connect it to the Clayton Act and the early formation of WHO in 1947), and they claim violation of the TFEU (the treaty for the functioning of the European Union), asserting Article 101 sets out that this was never public health but racketeering to instill terror to adapt population behavior. Data from Zurich is used to argue there was no pandemic: the speaker notes that during the death pandemic of the globe, life insurance claims fell by $30,000,000,000, stating that the data is unambiguous and that there was genocide rather than a pandemic. They pivot to the 2011 WHO, Welcome Trust, PATH, and Gates Foundation malaria vaccine program for children under six months, highlighting that 66 children in the vaccine group were murdered and 28 in the control group were murdered, with the control described as a cocktail of pathogenic injections rather than saline. The speaker references Article five, section 13, claiming immunity from arrest or legal process was designed as permanent immunity for a criminal organization formed in 1947; they connect the first WHO director general, Renee Sand (sic) from the Dachau-era milieu, to Brock Chisholm, who allegedly advocated population control as a primary objective. The claim extends to funding and influence: Gates Foundation allegedly provides 88% of WHO’s foundation donations, which the speaker says constitutes a tax and competition law violation in Europe and the United States. The four-step process is illustrated again with sourcing: to sustain funding beyond the crisis, to increase public understanding for medical countermeasures like pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccines, and to use media hype to attract investors who see profit at the end of the process, as documented by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board and Peter Daszak’s partnerships. The 2014 Rand Paul–Anthony Fauci correspondence is cited, showing a letter from NIAID to UNC Chapel Hill stating that gain-of-function research would continue during a moratorium with a budget funded by DARPA and NIH. The speaker quotes that the Wuhan virus was anticipated, citing a 2016 publication stating SARS-like Wuhan Institute of Virology virus one is poised for human emergence, implying foreknowledge and manipulation of the virus in Wuhan and UNC Chapel Hill. The talk shifts to the characterization of the work as biological warfare enabling technologies, referencing Ralph Baric’s 2005 DARPA/MITRE presentation and subsequent NIAID and DARPA funding, concluding that the project was to produce biological warfare enabling technologies rather than public health measures. They highlight substantial profits for Pfizer and Moderna from public funds and accuse the WHO of laundering money via a budget expansion request of 11%. In closing, the speaker maintains this is not a public health crime or constitutional crime, but a criminal conspiracy of criminal racketeers. They call for ending the criminal organization itself and urge everyone to destroy the WHO.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a conspiracy surrounding Charlie’s death, challenging the official narrative. - Speaker 0 says, “we definitely penetrated our water jugs,” and notes this won’t stop conspiracy theories. “His head fell off. I figured this is probably what would happen. I was trying to remain optimistic, but that right there is why people are skeptical on the official story.” They state, “The thirty aught six is a very hard round to stop.” - Speaker 1 adds that they want to illustrate what the federal government is selling, and asserts, “that particular bullet would have decapitated Charlie.” They describe the idea that the bullet ricocheted and went inward as “beyond ridiculous” and “insulting.” They criticize attempts to present a certain narrative with goofball public figures, saying, “they think that if they send out these, like, glee boys, like Nick Fuentes… then a bunch of hunters are gonna go, yeah. I see what you mean, man.” They declare that the scenario is never going to happen. - They foresee two possible outcomes: either the government will declare war on the American people because the public won’t accept their account, or they will have to “give us something that’s truthful.” They insist someone must come forward with something that makes sense. - Speaker 1 expresses a belief that the conspiracy is far-reaching, likening it to the JFK assassination, and claims that people close to Charlie are aware of things and “sold him out in many ways every single day.” They argue that the more the truth is avoided and the anxiety surrounding the night before Charlie died is downplayed, the guiltier those involved appear. - They state a conviction that the Deep State is involved in the assassination and that multiple states are implicated. They contend those responsible “don’t know what to do” and have “completely come undone” because they believed wealth and power would let them get away with it. However, they suggest “common sense seems to be ruling the roost.” Overall, the speakers argue that the official explanation is implausible, predict governmental evasions or manipulation, and contend that a deep-state-backed conspiracy involving multiple states may be uncovering itself as untenable under scrutiny. They emphasize the need for truthful disclosure rather than continued obfuscation.

Vaccine makers face the challenge of misinformation. The speaker believes those who deliberately spread misinformation are criminals because they cost lives. They shared a personal story of their wife's death after getting the vaccine, which was falsely attributed to it. The purpose of spreading such lies was to discourage people from getting vaccinated. The speaker emphasizes that the number of people who died due to not getting vaccinated far outweighs the individual cases like their wife's. Therefore, they consider those spreading misinformation to be criminals.

The discussion centers on the claim that SIDS is a “vaccine death.” It states that seventy five percent of all deaths from SIDS happened within seven days of a vaccination. The conversation then shifts to polio. It references “Polio, forty eight hour safety review trial” and says the safety review lasted “forty eight hours, two days.” It also brings up President Roosevelt, described as “famous for having polio in the wheelchair,” and adds that he “had transverse myelitis.” A response rejects the polio framing: “No way. Didn’t have polio.” The speaker disputes trust in doctors’ knowledge of vaccines, saying, “How can you sit here and say doctors don’t know anything about vaccines?” Another claim follows that “a doctor is lucky if they have a half a day education on vaccines,” and that “I have yet to find a pediatrician that can list the ingredients of any vaccines.” The speaker further asserts, “They don’t know anything at all.” A broader argument is made about vaccine testing and timing for children. The speaker claims that “99.5 of our children are getting a product that was tested for five days” and says this product was tested “for a disease they will not come in contact with until they’re an adult.” The speaker adds “and hopefully never,” linking this to a belief about later behavior: “if they were raised correctly, will find themselves sharing heroin needles or sleeping with prostitutes.” The conclusion of the argument is presented as a belief that uncovering these “truth” points will expose broader wrongdoing: “I do believe when people see the truth on this, it will reveal everything that’s corrupt about the world that you live in.”

The speaker, whose background is in critical care, worked throughout the pandemic in the ICU providing direct care to COVID patients. After eighteen months of what they describe as “chaos,” they left the bedside because they “could not watch one more” of their patients “needlessly die” due to “deadly hospital protocols” and the “denial of life saving medications.” They state that hospital messaging said COVID was killing all patients, but they contend that “this was not the case at all,” and instead that “the complete and total medical mismanagement of COVID” was killing them. They argue that if patients were truly dying of the virus itself, there would be widespread deaths outside healthcare settings, asking why bodies were not being pulled “from homes and off of the streets en masse.” They then assert that “patients… they’re not dying at home” and “they’re not dying on our streets,” and claim that people are dying “in our hospitals,” saying it is “time that we start asking ourselves why.” Although they “walked away,” they say one thing that still haunts them from bedside work is the patients’ “faces”—specifically the faces of patients they “knew didn’t need to die.” They describe not being comfortable with death initially, but learning that death comes for all of us eventually. They say that in nursing—especially in the ICU—they learned that there are “fates far worse than death.” They describe providing compassion in a patient’s last moments as an “honor,” emphasizing care and compassion during end-of-life periods. They frame their experience during the pandemic as “different,” saying these patients “didn’t die from a disease” and “didn’t die from a virus,” but instead “died in a hospital holocaust.” They use this description to claim that a “shamelessly corrupt system,” which they say used “well intentioned nurses” to carry out a “sinister plan,” was responsible. They further state that “ventilators” are “the new gas chambers.” Finally, the speaker says they did not leave before witnessing “numerous alarming signs” that “these novel vaccines were causing great harm” to their patients.

The speakers claim the push for a COVID vaccine was motivated by money, and they believe there's a connection between the vaccine and subsequent deaths and blood clots. They express frustration that people aren't acknowledging this connection. One speaker shares a story about a veteran who was allegedly told that the hospital treating him was not allowed to connect his adverse side effects to the vaccine, even when listed as side effects. They say corporations don't want to talk about it because they mandated the vaccine. They believe people who got vaccinated don't want to admit they made a bad decision, leading them to deny any link between the vaccine and increased mortality rates, strokes, cancer, and heart attacks. One speaker recalls being gaslit by a former prime minister who denied coercing anyone into getting vaccinated, despite restrictions placed on the unvaccinated. Another speaker says they were misrepresented on CNN during their own recovery from COVID.

The speaker claims that the COVID-19 pandemic was premeditated and an act of terrorism by a state. They argue that the United States and the UK, along with researchers worldwide, planned to use the virus to impose tyrannical reforms on society. They emphasize that there are many people who did not comply with these measures. Another speaker praises the evidence presented by the first speaker, stating that it is all based on published documents and facts. They encourage others to read the documents and draw their own conclusions.

The speaker asserts that the intentional nature of the situation is clear, supported by a wealth of data on scientific fraud, regulatory fraud, PCR test fraud, adverse events, deaths, and excess mortality correlating with vaccination rates. The regulators, who are experienced and trained, are accused of lying and denying the evidence. While some argue it is for financial gain, the speaker argues against this, pointing out that liability has been removed and shipping placebos would have been more profitable. Instead, the speaker concludes that the intention is to harm and kill people.

The speaker warns that those who promote RNA vaccines as safe and effective are either ignorant or evil. They urge citizens and physicians to reject this crime against humanity to protect themselves, their descendants, and their family's reputation. Otherwise, they will be remembered as some of history's worst criminals.