reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Public health has become militarized, with the military using public health language and laws to carry out a military campaign. The COVID-19 vaccines are referred to as weapons, and clinical trials were not necessary for the Department of Defense (DoD) to pay contractors for producing and distributing them. The World Health Organization declared a public health emergency, triggering the domestic framework and the issuance of executive orders by Congress and Presidents Trump and Biden. This has created a funding stream for military-led bioweapons research. People potentially carrying the disease are classified as national security threats, allowing actions without consent. The framework also shields the government, developers, and regulators from liability and prosecution. This is a joint project involving the DoD, Federal Reserve, World Health Organization, and Bank for International Settlements.

The speaker explains that a series of laws allowed the military to take over vaccine distribution without any clinical trials or safety testing. The safety testing conducted by the pharmaceutical industry was just for show and had no regulatory implications. The FDA, which is responsible for regulating medical products, does not have the authority to regulate these countermeasures. The legal framework being used pretends that these are health products when they are actually in a different legal space.

Public health has become militarized, with the military using public health language and laws to carry out a military campaign. The COVID-19 vaccines are referred to as weapons, and clinical trials were not necessary for the Department of Defense (DoD) to pay contractors for producing and distributing them. The World Health Organization declared a public health emergency, triggering the domestic framework and leading to the funding and reinforcement of the program by Congress and Presidents Trump and Biden. This has created a funding stream for military-led bioweapons research. People potentially carrying the disease are classified as national security threats, allowing actions without consent. The framework also shields the products, people involved, and government funders from liability and prosecution. This is a joint project involving the DoD, Federal Reserve, World Health Organization, and Bank for International Settlements.

The speaker discusses the structure and operations of a criminal cartel involving government, pharma, and the military. They explain how the Department of Defense in the US orders COVID products, including vaccines, under a contracting framework that allows them to bypass regulations and maintain secrecy. They highlight the significance of declaring a pandemic or public health emergency, which exempts these products from pharmaceutical regulations. The speaker accuses the government, pharmaceutical companies, and other entities of collaborating in a model of fascism. They also suggest that the COVID vaccines are ineffective and dangerous, leading to deaths and other adverse effects. They call for investigations and legal action against the perpetrators.

A bombshell report reveals that the Department of Defense controlled the COVID-19 program from the beginning, using shady approval authorizations to shield big pharma from liability. The Pentagon used laws like the PrEP Act, Emergency Use Authorization, and Other Transaction Authority to protect pharmaceutical companies. Documents obtained by a former executive show that the vaccines were not compliant with good manufacturing practices, with extreme variability in adverse events. Clinical trials were deceptive, with subjects and investigators kept in the dark. The National Security Council treated COVID as an act of war, while telling the public it was a health event. The Pentagon's influence extends to multiple agencies, with a secret Pandemic Enterprise formed in 2013. The countermeasures used are prototypes, not fully tested vaccines.

Secretary Kennedy, the mRNA injections marketed as COVID vaccines are merely emergency use authorized medical countermeasures. This pathway bypasses standard pharmaceutical regulations and informed consent. Misrepresentations about these products' safety and efficacy are legally permissible, making official claims unreliable. These shots are now on the CDC childhood vaccination schedule for infants as young as nine months old. The current PREP Act declaration, extended until 2029, abuses federal law intended for short-term emergencies. This shields pharmaceutical companies from liability for deaths and injuries caused by these unsafe products. The FDA falsely claims full approval for those 12 and older, yet the injured are directed to a compensation program that denies almost all claims. I urge you to terminate the PREP Act emergency declaration and investigate the misuse of federal law in the pandemic response, which has led to a human tragedy and destroyed public trust.

A bombshell report reveals that the Department of Defense controlled the COVID-19 program from the start, using shady approval authorizations to shield big pharma from liability. The Pentagon employed laws like the PrEP Act, Emergency Use Authorization, and Other Transaction Authority to protect pharmaceutical companies and avoid proper clinical trials. Documents obtained by a former pharmaceutical executive, Sasha Lydipova, confirm that the vaccines were not good manufacturing practice compliant, with extreme variability in adverse events. The Pentagon's involvement stems from treating COVID-19 as an act of war, with the National Security Council setting policy. The deception extends to censoring lab leak theories and coordinating efforts across multiple agencies. The public was misled about the nature of the vaccines, which were actually prototypes and not subject to proper testing.

The Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) regulation from the Clinton administration included safeguards. You can distribute a medication without approval, clinical trials, or safety testing, but only if no existing approved drug is effective against the target illness. To use the EUA for vaccines, any effective drugs against COVID needed to be discredited. Early on, it was known that hydroxychloroquine was effective against coronavirus. NIH studies demonstrated its effectiveness both as a preventative and as a cure. Ivermectin was also very effective. Acknowledging that these drugs worked would have eliminated the use of the emergency use authorization. So, they had to suppress them.

Speaker 0 summarizes a view that public health has been militarized and the military repurposed as a public health front. The term “kill box” is used to describe a geographic or three-dimensional area established for military attacks; the speaker asserts the DOD and WHO aim to render the entire world as their terrain, with the population as all people and the campaign as permanent. Weapons in this campaign are described as informational (propaganda and censorship), psychological (fear and obedience to government), and chemical/biological/radiological/nuclear (referred to as pharmaceuticals, vaccines, but claimed to be toxins and pathogens). The speaker contends this project has centuries-long roots in globalist banking and military interests, intensifying in 1913 with the Federal Reserve Act and in the 1930s–40s with public health. By the mid-1960s, they claim, poisons were fraudulently labeled as medicines or vaccines to induce civic duty, citing COVID as an example of coercion (do this or you’ll kill your grandma). The pharmaceutical method is described as enabling plausible deniability and legal impunity, allowing mass harm with less traceable fingerprints. Coercion is described as cascading from the Bank for International Settlements to other federal central banks, then down through state, national, local governments, school districts, hospitals, and beyond. Compliance with masking, testing, isolation, and injections purportedly grants financial access, while noncompliance cuts such access. Legally, the speaker traces a framework beginning in 1969 with a U.S. law to set up chemical and biological warfare programs (50 USC Chapter 32) and the key terms “protective,” “prophylactic,” and “defensive,” used to justify research while arguing that all biologically active products are inherently toxic. The 1983 Public Health Service Act amendment created the Public Health Emergencies Program and a $30 million “slush fund” (still funded under later acts). The 1986 National Vaccine Program and the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act established a liability exemption for manufacturers and a compensation program for injuries, later modeled by the countermeasures injury compensation program post-COVID. Internationally, the World Health Organization is described as a military arm of a one-world government, with International Health Regulations amended in 2005 to 2007 to push national systems toward surveillance, detention, quarantine, and forced treatment during international outbreaks. The real aim is shifting sovereignty from nation-states to WHO and BIS upon a public health emergency of international concern. Key years cited include 1997–1998 (Emergency Use Authorization and rehoming CBRN stockpiles), 2000–2002 (Public Health Threats and Emergencies Act, AUMF), and post-9/11 legislation (Patriot Act, Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness, Homeland Security Act), expanding a permanent state of global conflict. From 2003–2009, executive orders, funding, and agency guidance integrated DHS, DOJ, HHS, and DoD, enabling experimental products like vaccines and gene therapies. The Pfizer matter is cited to claim DoD prototypes bypass standard trials and FDA authorization, with government support for early termination of normal processes. Since 2020, the speaker links the WHO declaration of Public Health Emergency of International Concern with domestic PREP Act declarations and subsequent acts (Defense Production Act, Stafford Act, National Emergencies Act) to build a funding stream for military-led bioweapons research and use, while shielding participants from liability and enabling state sovereignty pushback through Article 10 of the Constitution. The speaker argues that these developments threaten constitutions and state protections, calling for increased state authority, and predicts a tipping point with criminal prosecutions, asserting that the actions constitute war crimes.

Public health has been militarized, with the military using public health language and laws to carry out a military campaign. The COVID-19 vaccines are referred to as weapons, and clinical trials were not necessary for the Department of Defense (DoD) to pay contractors. The World Health Organization declared a public health emergency, triggering the domestic framework and the issuance of medical countermeasures. Congress and Presidents Trump and Biden passed acts and issued executive orders to strengthen the program. This created a funding stream for military-led bioweapons research. People potentially carrying the disease were reclassified as national security threats, allowing for actions without consent. The framework also shields products, individuals, and government funders from liability and prosecution. This is a joint project involving the DoD, Federal Reserve, World Health Organization, and Bank for International Settlements.

Public health has become militarized, with the military using public health language and laws to carry out a military campaign. COVID-19 vaccines are referred to as weapons, and clinical trials were not necessary for the Department of Defense (DoD) to pay contractors for producing and distributing them. The World Health Organization declared a public health emergency, triggering the domestic framework and the issuance of executive orders by Congress and Presidents Trump and Biden. This has created a funding stream for military-led bioweapons research. People potentially carrying the disease are classified as national security threats, allowing actions without consent. The framework also shields the government, developers, and regulators from liability and criminal prosecution. This is a joint project involving the DoD, Federal Reserve, World Health Organization, and Bank for International Settlements.

Public health has been militarized, with the military using public health language and laws to carry out a military campaign. The COVID-19 vaccines are referred to as weapons, and clinical trials were not necessary for the Department of Defense (DoD) to pay contractors. The World Health Organization declared a public health emergency, triggering the domestic framework and the issuance of medical countermeasures. Congress and Presidents Trump and Biden passed acts and issued executive orders to strengthen the program. This created a funding stream for military-led bioweapons research. People potentially carrying the disease were reclassified as national security threats, allowing actions without consent. The framework also shields products, individuals, and government funders from liability and prosecution. This is a joint project involving the DoD, Federal Reserve, World Health Organization, and Bank for International Settlements.

In 2018, the World Health Organization changed the definition of an adverse event from immunization, only considering published literature. This means that genetically modified injections have no established adverse events. So when Pfizer and Moderna claim no adverse events, they are technically telling the truth. This change occurred just before the pandemic, leading some to speculate it was part of a plan. It's concerning that this information is not widely known, as discussing it can lead to censorship. Big pharma is the biggest killer in the world, surpassing even the military industrial complex. They have caused more deaths than guns and bullets. Big pharma is a means of controlling and limiting our freedoms.

A bombshell report reveals that the Department of Defense controlled the COVID-19 program from the beginning, using shady approval authorizations to shield big pharma from liability. The Pentagon used laws like the PrEP Act, Emergency Use Authorization, and Other Transaction Authority to protect pharmaceutical companies and avoid proper clinical trials. Clinical trial subjects and investigators were deceived, and informed consent was not required. The National Security Council treated COVID-19 as an act of war, while telling the public it was a health event. The Pentagon's influence extended to agencies like the FDA and NIH. A secret Cabal called the Pandemic Enterprise was formed in 2013 to discuss countermeasures with strict confidentiality. The so-called vaccines were actually prototypes ordered by the Department of Defense, and people were not informed of this. Safety testing and animal trials were skipped, violating regulations.

Public health has become militarized, with the military using public health language and laws to carry out a military campaign. The COVID-19 vaccines are referred to as weapons, and clinical trials were not necessary for the Department of Defense (DoD) to pay contractors for producing and distributing them. The World Health Organization declared a public health emergency, triggering the domestic framework and leading to the funding and reinforcement of the program by Congress and Presidents Trump and Biden. This has created a funding stream for military-led bioweapons research. People potentially carrying the disease are classified as national security threats, allowing actions without consent. The framework also shields the products, people involved, and government funders from liability and prosecution. This is a joint project involving the DoD, Federal Reserve, World Health Organization, and Bank for International Settlements.

A bombshell report reveals that the Department of Defense controlled the COVID-19 program from the beginning, using shady approval authorizations to shield big pharma from liability. The Pentagon used laws like the PrEP Act, Emergency Use Authorization, and Other Transaction Authority to protect pharmaceutical companies and avoid proper clinical trials. The documents obtained by Sasha Lydipova, a former executive of a pharmaceutical contract resource organization, show that the vaccines were not good manufacturing practice compliant and had extreme variability in adverse events. The Pentagon's involvement was part of treating COVID as an act of war, with the National Security Council setting policy. The deception extended to censoring lab leak theories and keeping the public in the dark.

Speaker 0 explains that people wonder why ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were suppressed, noting these are well established drugs with safety profiles and billions of doses given. He says ivermectin is a human drug and also works on horses, but it would win the Nobel Prize because it works so well on human beings. Speaker 1 responds “Mhmm.” Speaker 0 states there is a little known federal law that says you cannot give an emergency use authorization (EUA) to a vaccine if there is any medication approved for any purpose that is shown effective against the target disease. So if Tony Fauci or anybody had admitted that hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin are effective against COVID, it would have been illegal to give the EUAs to the vaccines, and they could never have gotten them approved. He suggests this would have collapsed a “200,000,000,000 enterprise.” Speaker 1 says, “That is fascinating,” noting they had been covering this for two years and that this is the first time hearing that; if the medical community had been saying ivermectin works, it would have affected EUA. Speaker 0 responds that the medical community did say that—17,000 doctors signed a petition, and there are many peer reviewed publications consistently saying so. Yet Fauci aggressively crusaded against it, insisting it’s a horse medication, that people are overdosing, and so on. He asks why Fauci kept saying it. Speaker 1 asks why Fauci continued to say it after he got the authorization. Speaker 0 offers possible explanations: one, even if you have an EUA, the law appears to say you can't have it anymore if there is a functioning medication. He acknowledges, though, that he cannot read Fauci’s mind but speculates there is a strong incentive for Fauci to kill ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. He cites several doctors who treated tens of thousands of COVID patients successfully and who argue that half a million Americans did not need to die, naming Harvey Reich at Yale, Peter McCulloch, and Peter Quarry.

Public health has become militarized, with the military using public health language and laws to carry out a military campaign. The COVID-19 vaccines are referred to as weapons, and clinical trials were not necessary for the Department of Defense (DoD) to pay contractors for producing and distributing them. The World Health Organization declared a public health emergency, triggering the domestic framework and the issuance of executive orders by Congress and Presidents Trump and Biden. This has created a funding stream for military-led bioweapons research. People potentially carrying the disease are classified as national security threats, allowing actions without consent. The framework also shields the products, people involved, and government funders from liability and prosecution. This is a joint project involving the DoD, Federal Reserve, World Health Organization, and Bank for International Settlements.

Normally, bringing a product to market involves proposals, clinical trial designs for efficacy and safety, years of trials, and FDA determinations on safety, efficacy, harm versus benefit, warnings, and inspections. All of this is abolished. Now, the HHS secretary only needs to decide, with or without evidence, that a product may be effective. Even if evidence shows ineffectiveness, they can still believe it's effective. This decision-making allows them to legally mandate the product for all Americans, regardless of evidence to the contrary. There are no stopping criteria, and the secretary never has to reconsider their decision because there were no criteria to begin with.

Public health has become militarized, with the military using public health language and laws to carry out a military campaign. The COVID-19 vaccines are referred to as weapons, and clinical trials were not necessary for the Department of Defense (DoD) to pay contractors for producing and distributing them. The World Health Organization declared a public health emergency, triggering the domestic framework and leading to the funding and reinforcement of the program by Congress and Presidents Trump and Biden. This has created a funding stream for military-led bioweapons research. People potentially carrying the disease are classified as national security threats, allowing actions to be taken without consent. The framework also shields the products, people involved, and government funders from liability and prosecution. This is a joint project involving the DoD, Federal Reserve, World Health Organization, and Bank for International Settlements.

The COVID-19 vaccines were rolled out under a series of laws that allowed the military to take over distribution, bypassing typical clinical trials and safety testing. The FDA's involvement was a "pretend authorization," as their mandate is to regulate interstate commerce of medical products, not countermeasures. The Department of Defense is fully in charge of the development, clinical trials, manufacturing, and distribution of the vaccines, utilizing "other transaction authority" (OTA), initially intended for NASA and weapons procurement. The vaccines are purchased under OTA as demonstration products, exempting them from FDA and CDC authority. Pharmaceutical companies were brought in largely for branding purposes, while the military oversaw manufacturing and distribution through military contractors.

The speaker argues that there was no informed consent regarding the COVID vaccine, as the government and pharmaceutical companies knew it wasn't a traditional vaccine. They hid potential adverse reactions and lack of evidence on transmission prevention. Despite good intentions, people were misled into taking it.

Public health has been militarized, with the military using public health language and laws to carry out a military campaign. The COVID-19 vaccines are referred to as weapons, and clinical trials were not necessary for the Department of Defense (DoD) to pay contractors for producing and distributing them. The World Health Organization declared a public health emergency, triggering the domestic framework and leading to the funding and reinforcement of the program by Congress and Presidents Trump and Biden. This has created a funding stream for military-led bioweapons research. People potentially carrying the disease are classified as national security threats, allowing actions without consent. The framework also shields the products, people involved, and government funders from liability and prosecution. This is a joint project involving the DoD, Federal Reserve, World Health Organization, and Bank for International Settlements.

Speaker 0 discusses the origin and framing of pandemic prevention and vaccine development as a military-led initiative. He cites a 2012 DARPA program called the Adept Protect p three program, described as a pandemic prevention platform. The proposal outlined the use of gene-encoded vaccines based on RNA or DNA with the goal of stopping a pandemic within sixty days. He suggests that, by the time President Trump referenced “Operation Warp Speed” to develop vaccines, there should have been preparation and acknowledgement that this work dated back to 2012, making it not rapid innovation but a decade-long effort. He argues that the public narrative of rapid development and stunning innovation surrounding vaccines is deceptive and that contractors like Moderna had already secured multi-million-dollar contracts in 2013. He notes that the military operates programs addressing biological threats and also works on answers such as monoclonal antibodies and vaccines. The claim is made that the military originated the idea of messenger RNA vaccines, not Pfizer or Moderna, and not in response to the outbreak from Wuhan. According to the speaker, this is a military program in origin and administration. The speaker asserts that Health and Human Services, under Alex Azar, together with the Department of Defense, ushered the public into a vaccine era, framing Emergency Use Authorization as a mechanism to rapidly deploy new technology into the military rather than the public. He contends that this mechanism’s broad public application began with the COVID-19 pandemic, which is presented as evidence that the FDA lacks ownership or control over the process because the program is characterized as military in origin and execution. The overall claim is that the program operates like a military operation with universal reach and without exemptions, implying a deeply embedded military approach to vaccine development and deployment. Throughout, the speaker emphasizes the continuity from a 2012 program proposal through to the public health landscape observed during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, asserting that the military’s involvement, timeline, and governance underlie the current vaccine paradigm and its regulatory pathways.