reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In this video, John Loughlin, director of FVD International, discusses a letter written by Marcel de Graaf, Joachim Koos, and other members of the European Parliament to the European Medical Agency (EMA). The letter raises concerns about the procedures followed and the alleged harmful nature of COVID vaccines. The speakers highlight issues such as the lack of transparency in vaccine contracts, the differences between approved and administered batches, and the potential dangers of the vaccines. They also discuss the corruption and illegality surrounding the approval process and the suppression of text messages by Ursula von der Leyen. The speakers emphasize the need for accountability and the protection of citizens' safety.

The speaker claims adverse events from the vaccine rollout were covered up and dismissed as rare and coincidental. They state that regulators approved the vaccines based on relative risk data (95%), which they describe as misleading, while the absolute risk reduction was only 0.84%, meaning 120 people had to be vaccinated to prevent one infection. The speaker alleges that Pfizer has 31 convictions, including withholding data, presenting false data, and bribing clinicians and regulators. They claim over 100 doctors have written to various health organizations, including the NHS and MHRA, about the vaccine program, but received only one response. The speaker concludes that science is dead because discussion, analysis, and debate are no longer allowed, and decisions are being made without scientific basis.

The speaker claims that the genetic COVID-19 injections are more harmful than beneficial, especially for young and healthy individuals. They argue that the vaccines do not reduce COVID-19 infection and can actually increase the risk of infection, disease, and death compared to the unvaccinated. They also mention potential damage to the heart, brain, reproductive tissue, lungs, and immune system. Another speaker questions the testing of the Pfizer COVID vaccine and demands data from the committee. The response states that the vaccine was not tested for stopping transmission before entering the market. There are also concerns raised about the vaccines causing harm to women of reproductive age and unborn babies. The transcript ends with discussions about potential fraud and wrongful advertising related to the vaccines.

The speaker claims that the genetic COVID-19 injections are more harmful than beneficial, especially for young and healthy individuals. They argue that the vaccines do not reduce COVID-19 infection and can actually increase the risk of infection, disease, and death compared to the unvaccinated. The speaker also mentions potential damage to the heart, brain, reproductive tissue, lungs, and immune system. Another speaker questions the testing of the Pfizer COVID vaccine and demands data from the committee. The response states that the vaccine was not tested for stopping transmission before entering the market. There are also concerns raised about the vaccines causing harm to women of reproductive age and unborn babies. The transcript ends with accusations of fraud and calls for criminal charges against vaccine manufacturers and government entities.

A group of European Parliament members wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) expressing concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines. The EMA responded, stating that the vaccines were only approved for individual immunization and not for controlling or preventing infections. They also admitted a lack of data on vaccine effectiveness against infections. The government's campaign to vaccinate for the sake of others was based on misinformation. Furthermore, the EMA emphasized the need to carefully consider safety information before administering vaccines. The mass vaccination campaign should be halted as it does not meet the EMA's requirements and puts people's health at risk. The government and supporting political parties should be held accountable for their lies and deception.

The speaker claims that Pfizer documents reveal evidence of a crime against humanity. They state that Pfizer knew the vaccines didn't work to stop COVID just one month after rollout and that the vaccines had vaccine failure and failure of efficacy. The speaker also highlights that Pfizer was receiving numerous reports of adverse events and had to hire staff to process the paperwork. They argue that the vaccines caused heart damage and other severe side effects, and that the materials in the vaccines biodistribute throughout the body, including the brain and ovaries. The speaker suggests that this is a deliberate bioweapon attack by the Chinese Communist Party and calls for justice.

Last month, a group of European Parliament members, including myself, wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) expressing concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines. The EMA's response revealed shocking facts. They admitted that the vaccines were only approved for individual immunization and not for controlling or preventing infections. Furthermore, there is a lack of data supporting the vaccines' effectiveness in preventing infections. In fact, the EMA stated that repeated exposure to the virus increases the risk of infection even in vaccinated individuals. The government's campaigns promoting vaccination to protect others were unauthorized and based on misinformation. The EMA also emphasized the need to carefully consider safety information before administering vaccines. The mass vaccination efforts were in direct contradiction to the approved use of the vaccines. The government and supporting political parties should be held accountable for their lies and deception. The vaccination campaign needs to be halted as it is not safe and does not meet EMA requirements.

Willem Engel, a pharmaceutical scientist and human rights activist, discusses the concerns and safety issues surrounding COVID vaccines. He criticizes the spread of misinformation by governments and the lack of accurate registration of vaccine risks. He questions the validity of informed consent when crucial information is not shared with the public. Another speaker highlights the patterns of adverse reactions in different vaccine batches, suggesting that informed consent was impossible due to the unknown risks associated with each batch. The statistician presents data showing three distinct patterns of adverse reactions in different vaccine batches, indicating a concerning safety signal. The speakers call for the withdrawal of vaccine marketing authorizations and accountability for the alleged mishandling of the vaccination campaign.

The speaker questions the effectiveness and safety of COVID vaccines, citing data on high death rates and adverse effects like myocarditis. They criticize the small sample size of Pfizer's clinical trials and argue that the benefits may not outweigh the risks, especially for young people. The speaker emphasizes the need for transparent data and larger studies to make informed decisions about vaccination.

Speaker 0 questions the seriousness of the European Commission's proposal, asking if they are really not forcing people to be vaccinated. Speaker 1 clarifies that they were not allowed to enter the parliament without a green certificate. Speaker 0 asks about the transparency of disclosing redacted versions of contracts, questioning how trust can be built without knowing the contents. They also inquire about the responsibility for side effects, stating that EU citizens should know the price of vaccines and not be forced to be vaccinated against their will.

The speaker questions the independence of regulatory agencies like the TGA, suggesting that they may be influenced by pharmaceutical companies that fund them. They criticize the quick adoption of COVID vaccines and the authorization for their use in young Australians, even before approval in the US and Europe. They argue that a Royal Commission is needed to investigate these issues and hold those responsible accountable. The speaker also mentions the Pfizer trials, claiming that there were more deaths in the vaccinated group than in the placebo group. They highlight the large amount of money spent on vaccines and the lack of transparency regarding contracts and terms. They believe that mandating vaccines violates international human rights.

Today, we are here to inform the public and representatives about the serious errors and safety issues related to mRNA injections. The previous speakers discussed the deadly political mistakes made by the EMA and the European Commission, who deliberately deceived the public and used pseudoscience to push people into potentially deadly experiments. The EMA admitted that the information provided to the public was not for informed consent. The lack of evidence for transmission control from the start makes the vaccination campaign a fraudulent and illegal marketing campaign. The argument that it is a disservice to vulnerable and elderly individuals is false, as the entire population has been forced to participate in this potentially deadly experiment. We demand the removal of all mRNA injections from the market and accountability for those responsible.

The speaker claims that vaccines are ineffective, using Israel as an example. They also mention a whistleblower revealing falsified death numbers after vaccination. Serious side effects like neurological disorders, thromboses, and myocarditis are mentioned. Experts predict problems for vaccinated individuals when encountering the wild virus due to immune system damage caused by the vaccines. The speaker alleges that the CDC was aware of the side effects before the vaccine rollout. The manufacturers are accused of not knowing the effectiveness or dangers of their vaccines but demand immunity from claims. They also insist on their products being purchased even if alternative treatments exist.

The speaker expresses concerns about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly regarding the presence of DNA and contamination in the shots. They argue that the vaccines have caused more deaths in a few months than all other vaccines combined in the past 30 years. The speaker also discusses the potential risks of gene therapy and the presence of SV40 sequences and antibiotic-resistant genes in the shots. They believe that the contamination and intentional inclusion of certain sequences raise concerns about the vaccines' safety. The speaker calls for the recall of the vaccines, especially for children, and questions the transparency of the FDA and CDC in handling the data. They suggest using alternative treatments like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.

The speaker claims that the death rates from a specific vaccine are significantly higher than all other vaccines combined over the past 30 years. They state that there have been 17,000 recorded deaths in the United States from this vaccine, but believe the actual death rate is much higher. They argue that the risks of the vaccine are unacceptable and that the benefits diminish after six months. They mention British data suggesting that vaccinated individuals are more likely to get COVID-19 compared to the unvaccinated, which was predicted. The speaker also accuses Pfizer of knowing about the risks and deaths associated with their vaccine but still proceeded with its distribution. They emphasize the need for people to see and understand these studies to uncover the alleged deception.

The speaker claims that the genetic COVID-19 injections are more harmful than beneficial, especially for young and healthy individuals. They argue that the vaccines do not reduce COVID-19 infection and can actually increase the risk of infection, disease, and death. The speaker also mentions potential damage to the heart, brain, reproductive tissue, lungs, and immune system. Another speaker questions the testing of the Pfizer COVID vaccine and demands data from the committee. The response states that the vaccine was not tested for stopping transmission before entering the market. There are also concerns raised about the vaccines causing harm to women of reproductive age and unborn babies. The transcript concludes with accusations of fraud and illegal advertising, suggesting that the vaccines have not been presented with their associated risks.

A recent study suggests that Pfizer may have excluded known deaths in the vaccine arm of its clinical trial from its data filing with the FDA in 2020. The study also found that trial subjects vaccinated with Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine experienced a significant increase in cardiovascular deaths compared to placebo controls. This information was not disclosed by Pfizer when the FDA was evaluating the vaccine for emergency use. Additionally, researchers identified instances where Pfizer attributed potential vaccine-associated deaths to other causes, undermining vaccine safety data. The data presented to the FDA prior to the authorization of Pfizer's vaccine did not include all the deaths that occurred during the trial. The speaker raises concerns about the prioritization of profit over lives and warns against trusting Big Pharma.

The speaker claims COVID vaccines are not actually vaccines and have caused unbelievable problems and damage. They allege the virus escaped from a lab with six manipulated inserts and the vaccine was 80% homologous to humans, causing major side effects. The speaker states that governments were informed but ignored warnings. They further claim the vaccines' quality control was appalling, the manufacturing process changed, and they were full of contaminants that can integrate into the genome, leading to massive excess deaths and a rise in cancer. The speaker questions why the vaccines haven't been banned, given COVID's diminished threat. They criticize the vaccination of children and call the vaccines "horrible gene therapies" causing "turbo cancers." They advocate for trials for those involved and accuse medical officers and regulatory bodies like MHRA, TGA, and FDA of incompetence and negligence, likening the situation to the Nuremberg trials. They assert the vaccines were never effective or safe, citing Pfizer's initial submissions to the FDA.

I am one of the scientists involved in a study on the safety and dependency of vaccine batches. We found three types of side effects: mild, severe, and even death. These adverse effects were present in the initial batches, which may have been changed during production or transportation. Patients were not informed of the risks and some received poor-quality batches. The Vice President of Pfizer admitted to building the plane while flying, and we have shown that one wing has fallen off. There is a safety issue that the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and national institutions should have addressed and informed the public about. Our study also suggests a potential link between certain cancers and different vaccine batches. We have observed increased mortality rates in European countries since May 21st. The EMA should have reacted to these findings and halted vaccinations or at least withdrawn the problematic batches. As a concerned citizen and doctor, I expected more action from the EMA. Thank you.

The speaker discusses their observations and analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic. They claim that the World Health Organization (WHO) has played an adverse role in both the virus's origins and the vaccine rollout. They believe that the WHO is part of a complex syndicate that includes various organizations and foundations. The speaker criticizes the WHO for not supporting early treatment protocols and claims that the vaccines have caused significant harm, including cardiovascular disease, neurologic issues, blood clots, and immunologic abnormalities. They argue that the vaccines should be removed from the market and urge the European Medicine Agency to take action. They also suggest that major stakeholders should withdraw from the WHO.

The speaker warns against manipulating patients and emphasizes the importance of safe vaccines. They mention having written a book advocating for safe vaccines and criticize the government's stance on vaccination. The speaker shares a personal experience of being vaccinated and still contracting COVID-19, highlighting the need for revaccination. They accuse big pharmaceutical companies of manipulating the population and influencing politicians. The speaker refers to a book that challenges official COVID-19 statistics and argues that the increase in deaths is due to age rather than the disease itself. They also mention cases of medical abuse and negligence in hospitals. The speaker estimates around 160,000 deaths in France, attributing them to pre-existing conditions and lack of treatment.

The speaker argues that there was no informed consent regarding the COVID vaccine, as the government and pharmaceutical companies knew it wasn't a traditional vaccine. They hid potential adverse reactions and lack of evidence on transmission prevention. Despite good intentions, people were misled into taking it.

There are concerns about overstocking and the misuse of public funds in relation to vaccine orders. The speaker has been asking questions about this issue since October 2022. They mention that they, along with the ombudsman and the European prosecutor, are investigating these matters. The speaker emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability in managing the budget. They highlight that billions of euros have been spent on vaccine orders, but only a fraction of the doses have been administered. They also mention that Pfizer is suing countries like Poland and Hungary for wanting to reduce their orders. The speaker believes this is the beginning of a major scandal.

The speaker questions the validity of claims that millions of lives have been saved by the COVID vaccine, stating that the evidence is weak and based on modeling studies. They argue that the vaccine has serious adverse effects, such as heart problems, and that the reported side effects are likely underreported. They criticize the lack of transparency and suppression of information by institutions and call for rebuilding the system. The speaker believes that the truth about vaccine harms will eventually come out and that getting COVID is not worse for the heart than vaccine side effects, contrary to some claims.

Willem Engel, a human rights activist, and other speakers discuss the safety issues and lack of informed consent surrounding COVID vaccines. They highlight the problem of adverse events not being properly registered within the first 14 days after vaccination, leading to a false sense of security. They also raise concerns about the classification of mRNA injections as vaccines and the potential long-term side effects. The speakers present data showing different patterns of adverse reactions in different vaccine batches, indicating a lack of consistency and informed consent. They criticize the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for not taking appropriate action and call for the withdrawal of market authorizations.