reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In January 2021, Brooke Jackson filed a lawsuit against Pfizer, claiming that she witnessed the company defraud the US government by lacking oversight in the making and distribution of vaccines. She was particularly concerned about the absence of clinical trials and safety protocols. Pfizer countered the lawsuit by stating that the US government was already aware of the lack of clinical trials and safety protocols. They provided evidence in the form of a base agreement, stating that there was no legal obligation to conduct valid clinical trials because the government's payment was for a large-scale manufacturing demonstration, not for clinical trials.

A lead regulatory scientist at Johnson & Johnson, Joshua Rees, allegedly admitted the company's COVID vaccine was "not safe and effective" and that they wanted to "just throw the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens." According to the scientist, the federal government pressured pharmaceutical companies to quickly create the vaccine, prioritizing speed over safety and efficacy. He stated that typical clinical trials were skipped, and testing was limited to lab models. He also stated that the government made a deal with pharmaceutical companies to solve the problem. The scientist discussed side effects, stating that the question was whether the benefit outweighed the worst possible side effect, using cancer patients as an example where quality of life is prioritized. The CDC has pulled the J&J vaccine due to declining use and the company's strategic shift. The scientist was approached for clarification but denied his identity and evaded questions.

Today, the speaker introduces Madame Cotton, a biostatistician who has written a remarkable book on the health disaster of COVID-19 vaccines. Madame Cotton highlights the serious flaws and methodological biases in the Pfizer clinical trial, calling for an audit of all participating centers to validate the results. The speaker emphasizes that the clinical trials were rushed, with market authorizations based on three months of data instead of the usual two years. Pregnant women, immunocompromised individuals, and those over 75 were not adequately represented in the trials. Furthermore, the speaker discusses the undisclosed risks and adverse effects of the vaccines, citing specific cases that were not included in the results. The speaker urges readers to educate themselves and not blindly trust authorities.

Maddy DeGary, a participant in Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine trial for 12 to 15-year-olds, suffered serious injuries post-vaccination. Pfizer initially downplayed her condition as abdominal pain, misleading the FDA. Despite being wealthy, only after an email to FDA officials did Pfizer admit to DeGary's injuries. FDA's response was lackluster, showing no concern for Pfizer's misconduct. The failure to report all adverse events corrupts the trial process, with no repercussions for Pfizer's actions.

Melissa McAtee, a former employee at Pfizer, shares her experiences and concerns about the Pfizer vaccine in an interview. She discusses the presence of fluorescent vials and the use of Chinese ingredients in the vaccine production process. Melissa also talks about the use of aborted fetal cell lines and the lack of transparency from Pfizer regarding these issues. She believes there is a deliberate effort to deceive the public and highlights the importance of asking questions and seeking the truth. Melissa suggests that there may be more nefarious motives behind the vaccine rollout and calls for accountability. She advises caution and encourages people to research and make informed decisions about vaccination.

I blew the whistle on the fake vaccine administration. They pressured me to either take the vaccine or fake it, and I chose to expose the situation instead. It seemed like they wanted to manipulate the numbers or silence me. The doctor was instructed to have me fake the vaccination, which angered me. It should have raised alarms for others as well. When I heard the ultimatum, I realized I had made the right choice. Looking back two years later, it’s clear that my decision was justified.

During the vaccine rollout, I witnessed people arriving in rental cars with simple coolers to administer the experimental shots in nursing homes. The shots were given to older individuals and those with dementia, who couldn't provide proper consent. Additionally, the shots were not stored at the required low temperature. This experiment had several flaws that need to be addressed.

A lead regulatory scientist at Johnson & Johnson, Joshua Rees, was secretly recorded stating the company's COVID vaccine was "not safe and effective" and that J&J "just threw the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens." He said the government pressured pharmaceutical companies to quickly create the vaccine. Rees stated that typical clinical trials were skipped, and testing was limited to lab models. He acknowledged potential side effects, stating that the risk was weighed against the benefit, using cancer patients as an example where quality of life was prioritized over curing the disease. The CDC has pulled the J&J vaccine due to declining use. When confronted about his statements, Rees denied his identity and evaded questions. The investigation aims to expose corruption and lies in government, corporations, and the pharmaceutical industry.

A lead regulatory scientist at Johnson & Johnson, Joshua Rees, was secretly recorded stating the company's COVID vaccine was "not safe and effective" and that J&J "just throw[s] the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens." He said the government pressured pharmaceutical companies to quickly create the vaccine. According to Rees, the typical clinical trial testing process was bypassed, and the vaccine was tested on lab models to "see if it works." He acknowledged the lack of research and the potential for side effects, stating that for cancer patients, the focus was on quality of life rather than a cure. The CDC has pulled the J&J vaccine from use in the United States, which J&J claims is due to declining use and a strategic shift. When confronted about his statements, Rees denied his identity and went into a restroom.

We found that the FDA lied about a maternal rat study that was testing the safety of mandating a vaccine to pregnant women. In every litter, individual pups had horrible bone deformities. This signal was extremely prominent. Moderna submitted the rat study, as they were required to do. The FDA then lied about the study results by claiming there were no problems. It was a huge enterprise in lying.

A Pfizer whistleblower has revealed documents indicating over 158,000 reports of adverse reactions from December 2020 to February 2021, including serious issues like spontaneous abortions. It is claimed that the FDA was aware of these reactions and sought to keep the documents hidden for 75 years, suggesting intentional harm. The whistleblower argues that the vaccine remains on the market despite serious concerns, highlighting a double standard compared to previous vaccine removals for fewer adverse events. There is a call for accountability for those involved in this situation.

At the outset, a process was approved by the FDA for emergency use authorization. However, it was later discovered that the approved process was swapped out for one containing contaminants like DNA and a cancer-causing substance. Pfizer redacted 800 pages of the manufacturing process, hiding the fact that a carcinogen was included. This lack of transparency led to no informed consent and potential harm to individuals. The vaccine rollout included a trial with a 2.4 times higher adverse event rate, including the presence of a carcinogen.

The speaker, a quality auditor at Pfizer, shares their concerns about the company's COVID-19 vaccine. They discovered that the vaccine vials were glowing and raised the issue with corporate, but received an unsatisfactory response. They also found documents in the company's database that mentioned the use of aborted fetal cell lines in the vaccine's development and the possibility of graphene oxide being present. The speaker noticed unusual security measures and a lack of proper quality control procedures. They also stumbled upon documents referencing depopulation and Satanism. Additionally, they discovered a Pfizer research and development lab in Wuhan with the address 666. The speaker believes that Pfizer, along with other organizations like the FDA and CDC, are aware of these issues. They express their distrust in vaccines and pharmaceutical companies in general.

Pharmaceutical companies paid $1.06 billion to reviewers at major medical journals, allegedly corrupting the peer review process. Studies from the CDC, FDA, and Pfizer purportedly revealed major breaches in COVID-19 vaccine safety signals during pregnancy, but these findings were allegedly ignored. Independent researchers who published findings contradicting pharmaceutical industry narratives faced persecution, censorship, and threats to their medical licenses and board certifications. The speaker claims this happened to them personally.

Speaker 0: I find information like this, you know, inserts for the vaccine. Paper's there, and there's nothing printed on it. I find that very interesting, disheartening, disgusting, and lots of other words, but then it gets better. It just keep wait. There's more. It just keeps happening. The CDC redacts every single word of a 148 page study on a myocarditis after COVID vaccination. So I asked research to print the study for me. 148 pages. The entire thing is redacted. What good does a study do if there's nothing there? Then I wanna know, wait, what might have been there that they needed to redact it? That's even scarier. Speaker 1: We're witnessing an active cover up of a colossal consumer product safety debacle that is is basically affecting the entire world. Mhmm. So in The United States, our CDC, National Institutes of Health, and the FDA are actively involved in a cover up. And the same is occurring in The UK with the MHRA, Europe with European medicine agencies, and Australia with the Therapeutic Goods Administration. Something is going on that's very big. Each one of these companies that puts out a product has an obligation to produce ninety days of safety monitoring after their product comes out. It's a regulatory dossier. If somebody has a problem with the new product and they call the company like Pfizer, Pfizer has to report, write down what happened, and they have to collate that in a report and produce it and make it publicly available. When it came to ninety days with Pfizer, the first vaccine that came out, remember Pfizer was approved 12/10/2020. Pfizer didn't produce the report. And then people started asking, well, what's happening with your vaccine? And Pfizer would not disclose what happened. And then it went to court. And the lawyer for the FDA stepped in and said they don't wanna release Pfizer's dossier for fifty five years. Mhmm. Oh. Fifty five years. And the the the plaintiff pushed. And finally, slowly, the Pfizer dossier came out. Pfizer recorded one thousand two hundred and twenty three deaths with their product within ninety days of release. People were calling Pfizer in desperation watching their family members die after taking the vaccine. Pfizer recorded over twelve hundred new adverse events, new problems that doctor Boden has talked to you about that we are grappling with the entire time. But the point is our FDA worked to cover this up. The FDA should be regulating this company. FDA should have been having at least monthly meetings and fully disclosing what was going on with these novel vaccines, which are a genetic transfer technology platform.

A recent study suggests that Pfizer may have excluded known deaths in the vaccine arm of its clinical trial from its data filing with the FDA in 2020. The study also found that trial subjects vaccinated with Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine experienced a significant increase in cardiovascular deaths compared to placebo controls. This information was not disclosed by Pfizer when the FDA was evaluating the vaccine for emergency use. Additionally, researchers identified instances where Pfizer attributed potential vaccine-associated deaths to other causes, undermining vaccine safety data. The data presented to the FDA prior to the authorization of Pfizer's vaccine did not include all the deaths that occurred during the trial. The speaker raises concerns about the prioritization of profit over lives and warns against trusting Big Pharma.

During the COVID pandemic, the Australian government granted Pfizer blanket immunity, allowing them to develop and distribute COVID injections without accountability. However, Pfizer has a history of criminal acts, including bribery and suppressing adverse trial results. The manufacturing process of the injections was also questionable, with evidence of live DNA derived from e coli found in the Pfizer product. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) did not conduct thorough testing on each batch of injections, relying instead on the US FDA's word. The lack of long-term safety testing is concerning, especially considering Pfizer's record-breaking profits. The Australian taxpayers are left with an unknown liability, while those who question the injections are labeled as "anti-vaxxers." The speaker opposes the forced administration of untested experimental injections and calls for accountability.

Maddy DeGary, a participant in Pfizer's 12-15 year old COVID-19 vaccine trial, suffered serious injuries post-vaccination. Pfizer misrepresented her condition as "functional abdominal pain" to the FDA. Despite efforts to bring attention to her true injuries, the FDA showed little concern and failed to hold Pfizer accountable for withholding information. This lack of transparency undermines the integrity of the trial process.

Hi, I’m Melissa McAtee, the Pfizer whistleblower. I worked at Pfizer for nearly 10 years, including 5 years as a quality auditor. I want to clarify some points from my interviews. I have evidence of my employment, including my work badge and photos of products I tested. I noticed something unusual about the vaccine solution; it glows under certain conditions, unlike other products that appear clear. The labeling on the vaccine vials was also placed low, obscuring the solution. Additionally, Pfizer manufactures remdesivir, which also had an unusual appearance when reconstituted. I encourage everyone to do their own research on these topics.

Pfizer's claim of 96% efficacy for their vaccine was questioned. The study and data were not independently verified, and Pfizer wanted to keep the data hidden for 75 years. The true effectiveness of the vaccine, based on absolute risk reduction, is less than 1%. More people died and were harmed in their trials compared to the placebo group. The vaccine's safety was questionable from the start, and it is not effective. Additionally, appropriate studies were not conducted for new variants.

Melissa McAtee, a former employee at Pfizer, shares her experiences and concerns about the production of the Pfizer vaccine. She reveals that Chinese-marked bags with unknown contents were being used in the compounding process, and she witnessed vials emitting a fluorescent light. Melissa also discovered emails discussing the use of aborted fetal cell lines in the vaccine and the intentional withholding of information from the public. She believes that there is a deliberate agenda behind the vaccine rollout and urges people to question the safety and ethics of mRNA technology. Melissa calls for unity in exposing the globalist agenda and emphasizes the importance of informed consent.

A Pfizer whistleblower has revealed documents indicating over 158,000 reports of adverse reactions from December 2020 to February 2021, including serious issues like spontaneous abortions. This raises concerns about the intentional release of the vaccine and the knowledge of its potential to cause severe health problems, including heart attacks and infertility. The FDA's efforts to keep these documents hidden for 75 years suggest awareness of these dangers. The continued availability of the vaccine is alarming, especially considering that other vaccines have been removed for far fewer adverse cases. Those involved in this situation must be held accountable.

A year ago, the speaker requested data from Emma, including clinical trials from medical companies before they sought marketing authorization for their products. Regarding Pfizer, the speaker notes that the company submitted a clinical trial that started on January 14, 2020. The speaker questioned a Pfizer representative about how Pfizer started testing a vaccine in January 2020, just days after the Chinese government released DNA data about the virus in December 2019, but the representative declined to answer. The speaker also mentions that Moderna submitted trials dating back to 2017. The speaker asked the CEO of Moderna how it was possible to submit vaccine tests years before the virus was discovered in December 2019. The speaker states that these are legitimate questions that people are asking, but unfortunately, the companies are declining to answer.

A Pfizer whistleblower within the company released documents showing that there were over 158,000 reports of adverse reactions from 12/01/2020 through 02/28/2021. The reports include serious adverse reactions and spontaneous abortions. The whistleblower states that the FDA was well aware and wanted these documents hidden for seventy five years. According to the speaker, the documents prove that the adverse events were intentionally released and that officials knew all along that the vaccine was going to cause massive heart attacks and strokes and deaths and infertility and miscarriages. The speaker claims the list of adverse effects goes on, including neurological issues, and questions how this vaccine remains on the market, noting that vaccines have been removed where ten cases of a child getting sick occurred. The speaker describes the situation as evil, intentional, and asserts that those involved must be held accountable.

Pfizer has been forced to release previously secret documents, including FDA approval packages, due to court orders and successful FOIA requests. These documents reveal that Pfizer tested different versions of their vaccine during preclinical and clinical trials, which goes against FDA guidance. The different versions included modified RNA, unmodified RNA, self-amplifying RNA, and Spike protein alone. Surprisingly, all these versions were tested under the same investigational new drug number, despite FDA guidance stating that multiple versions should have their own individual numbers. Additionally, the toxicity of the mRNA active ingredient in the COVID-19 vaccines was never studied. This raises concerns about the regulatory process and the lack of safety testing.