reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The US government's Department of Justice defends pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer in court cases, even when they are accused of withholding clinical trial data. This shows that the pharmaceutical companies are not in charge, but rather controlled by the Department of Defense and the government. While the pharmaceutical companies are also responsible for their actions and should be prosecuted, this collaboration between government and private corporations is a model of fascism. Pfizer has even used this alliance as a legal defense in a case where they are accused of defrauding the government. They argue that they delivered the fraud the government ordered.

Speaker 0 described a guest whose 18-year-old daughter was injected with Pfizer and developed cancer. He stated that he has sat across numerous people who lost their children to these injections, with some deaths immediate and others gruesome, and that these people must testify to lawmakers and others recounting their stories repeatedly. He framed this as a massive crime that needs to stop. He asserted that the FDA was fully aware that these injections would cause cancer, citing published guidance documents. He claimed that the FDA regulates the industry and, in 2015 and 2013 (and even more recently), wrote extensive guidance documents explaining to manufacturers developing mRNA products that they must study risks, including cancer, death, fertility issues, blindness, strokes, and cardiovascular issues. He said these risks were documented as regulatory knowledge and that manufacturers were told they had to study these risks and exclude them. He also claimed that studying these risks in healthy volunteers was not allowed because it was considered unethical. He contrasted this with 2020, stating that “all of a sudden, all of this is solved,” calling it a joke, and that this period raised his suspicions, prompting him to investigate independently. He concluded by describing the situation as a premeditated crime in which regulators knew, and that the military conducted a “fake exercise” to capture all these pharmaceutical companies and compel them to create these weapons.

I'm an attorney looking for ways to sue those responsible for damages during the pandemic, but the PrEP Act, the CARE Act, and the 1986 VICA Vaccine Act, provide broad immunity from liability. As a corporate liability officer, my colleague and I agree, that we should go after Pfizer for the fraud they have committed. The challenge is figuring out how to break through their defenses. Pfizer will argue they delivered the fraud that the government ordered. Even if a case gets dismissed based on this argument, the admission itself is valuable. We need to get them to admit in court whether committing mass murder and genocide is explicit US government policy, or if individuals like Kotlik, Marks, and Fauci were rogue actors acting outside their authority.

The speaker accuses a company of knowingly selling a product infected with AIDS to other countries after it was taken off the market in the US. They claim that the US government allowed this to happen and that thousands of innocent hemophiliacs have died as a result. Internal documents allegedly show that the company was aware of the contamination. The government is criticized for not taking action against the company and for being involved in a cover-up. The speaker also highlights the conflict of interest within the FDA, stating that a significant portion of its budget comes from the pharmaceutical industry.

The speaker claims that the COVID-19 vaccines were not developed by Moderna and Pfizer, but by the NIH, which owns 50% of the patents. They also assert that the vaccines were not manufactured by Pfizer or Moderna, but by military contractors. According to the speaker, Pfizer and Moderna were paid to put their stamps on the vaccines, implying they originated from the pharmaceutical industry, when in reality, the speaker says, it was a military project from the beginning.

The speaker accuses a company of knowingly selling a product infected with AIDS to other countries after it was taken off the market in the US. They claim that the US government allowed this to happen and that thousands of innocent hemophiliacs have died as a result. Internal documents allegedly prove that the company was aware of the contamination. The government is criticized for not taking action against the company and for being involved in a cover-up. The speaker also highlights the conflict of interest within the FDA, stating that a significant portion of its budget comes from the pharmaceutical industry it regulates.

The speaker accuses the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer and Moderna of being part of a criminal cartel that aims to enrich themselves while harming and killing the rest of humanity. They claim that the WHO has a history of criminal behavior and uses a four-step process to execute their plans. The speaker also alleges that the COVID-19 pandemic was not a public health crisis but a deliberate act of genocide. They provide evidence of unethical practices, including the murder of children in vaccine trials and the manipulation of viruses for biological warfare. The speaker calls for the dismantling of the WHO and condemns the corruption and crimes committed by these organizations.

The speaker claims Pfizer committed the greatest crime against humanity in recorded history due to the scale and foreknowledge of harm. She states Pfizer knew within a month of the vaccine rollout in November 2020 that it didn't work to stop COVID, referring to internal language describing "vaccine failure" and "failure of efficacy." She claims the 3rd most common side effect in the documents is COVID. According to the speaker, mandates, job losses, family separations, deaths, injuries, and sterilizations were based on a lie. The speaker asserts that society was destroyed, children's education was ruined, depression and suicide levels increased, and businesses were destroyed, all based on a lie, resulting in a massive transfer of wealth.

The speaker discusses court solutions and criticizes the promotion of certain cases in the media. They highlight Brooke Jackson's case as a significant victory, revealing that Pfizer was forced to release a contract with the Department of Defense (DOD), exposing the operation as a military one. They argue that the government has legalized mass murder through fraudulent means, deploying vaccines that they consider to be poison. The speaker also criticizes the legal approach in most cases, which they claim legitimizes falsehoods about the pandemic. They emphasize the importance of recognizing the structure revealed in previous judgments and prosecuting Pfizer for fraud.

The speaker accuses a company of knowingly selling a product infected with AIDS to other countries after it was taken off the market in the US. They claim that the US government allowed this to happen and that thousands of innocent hemophiliacs have died as a result. Internal documents allegedly show that the company was aware of the contamination. The government is criticized for not taking action against the company and for being involved in a cover-up. The speaker also highlights the conflict of interest within the FDA, stating that a significant portion of its budget comes from the pharmaceutical industry.

The attorney (Speaker 0) opens by expressing frustration that pandemic-era liability protections—the PREP Act, the CARE Act, and the 1986 VICA Vaccine Act—grant broad immunity to the actors involved, effectively shielding them from liability and allowing what he calls “mass murder.” He asks Sacha whether there are obvious legal avenues to sue Pfizer and obtain redress for what he views as illegal acts, given this shield of immunity. Sacha (Speaker 1) replies that neither he nor his colleagues discourage attempts to sue Pfizer due to the fraud allegations they’ve identified. He notes, however, that nobody knows exactly what will break through the immunity barrier, so they should try different approaches. He outlines the current landscape: the defense Pfizer will likely raise is that they did not defraud the government, but merely delivered fraud that the government ordered. He references a concrete example in Brooke Jackson’s case, where Pfizer filed a motion to dismiss in April, arguing the fraud claim centered on delivering government-ordered fraud rather than perpetrating it independently. Sacha emphasizes that while the case may be dismissed, it has not been yet. If a future dismissal occurs, the admission would be valuable, and the goal is to elicit admissions in court. He suggests that they need to prove, by any admissible method, that there was explicit U.S. government policy to commit mass murder and genocide, or that certain individuals—Robert Kodlek, Peter Marks, Fauci, and others—were rogue actors acting outside their authority. In other words, the objective is to obtain explicit statements or admissions that could substantiate claims of government-directed action or unauthorized conduct by specific individuals, to challenge the immunity and pursue redress.

The speaker accuses a company of knowingly selling a product infected with AIDS to other countries after it was taken off the market in the US. They claim that the US government allowed this to happen and that thousands of innocent hemophiliacs have died as a result. Internal documents allegedly show that the company was aware of the contamination. The government is criticized for not taking action against the company and for being part of a cover-up. The speaker also mentions that the FDA receives a significant portion of its budget from the pharmaceutical industry, raising concerns about its ability to regulate effectively.

Pfizer is considering mutating the COVID virus to create new vaccines, but they don't want the public to know. They are conducting experiments on live monkeys to study the virus and its mutations. Pfizer believes that by controlling the mutations in their labs, they can develop vaccines for new variants before they even emerge in nature. This would be a lucrative business model for them. The pharmaceutical industry has a revolving door with government officials, which benefits the industry but is bad for everyone else. The comments made by Pfizer's Jordan Walker show a lack of moral compass and a disregard for public health. Pfizer believes it has successfully captured the regulatory apparatus and can circumvent laws. Governments are turning a blind eye to this unethical behavior.

The speaker accuses a company of knowingly selling a product infected with the AIDS virus to other countries after it was taken off the market in the US. They claim that the US government allowed this to happen and turned a blind eye to the issue. The speaker mentions that thousands of hemophiliacs and their family members have died as a result. Internal documents allegedly prove that the company was aware of the contamination. The New York Times investigation reveals that the government was involved in a cover-up. Surprisingly, no corporate executive has been indicted or investigated by the US justice department. Additionally, it is revealed that a significant portion of the FDA's budget is funded by the pharmaceutical industry, raising concerns about its ability to regulate effectively.

The speaker claims Pfizer committed the greatest crime against humanity in recorded history due to the scale and foreknowledge of harm. They state Pfizer knew within three months of rollout that 1,225 people had died. The speaker alleges that by April 2021, Pfizer knew the injections were damaging minors' hearts, citing warnings from the Israeli health ministry and a pediatric group. Instead of informing the public, the speaker claims Pfizer held a "freak out conference" to plan how to lie to the American people, creating a 17-page script. This was allegedly followed by a summer-long propaganda campaign using influencers and TikTok personalities to promote injections among young people and teenagers.

Pfizer, a pharmaceutical company, created a shell company called Pharmacia and Upjohn Company Incorporated to protect itself legally. This shell company took the blame in a kickback case and was excluded from Medicare. Later, when Pfizer faced trouble, the shell company pleaded guilty again. Despite paying a large fine and settling civil suits, critics argue that the punishment is not enough to deter illegal activities. Pfizer claims to have implemented measures to prevent future wrongdoing, but skeptics believe that without significant consequences like prison sentences or bans on selling drugs to Medicare or Medicaid, the company will continue its questionable practices.

The speaker accuses a company of knowingly selling a product infected with AIDS to other countries after it was taken off the market in the US. They claim that the US government allowed this to happen and thousands of innocent people, including hemophiliacs and their family members, have died as a result. Internal documents allegedly prove that the company was aware of the contamination. The government is criticized for not taking action against the company and for being involved in a cover-up. The speaker also highlights the conflict of interest within the FDA, stating that a significant portion of its budget comes from the pharmaceutical industry it is supposed to regulate.

Pfizer, a company too big to fail, made a deal with the government to avoid being excluded from Medicare and Medicaid. They created a shell company, Pharmacia and Upjohn Company Incorporated, to take the blame for any convictions. This allowed Pfizer to continue doing business with the federal government. Despite paying a $1.2 billion criminal fine and settling civil suits for $1 billion, Pfizer's punishment may not be enough to deter other big pharma companies from engaging in illegal activities. The fear is that dealing with the Department of Justice is just seen as a cost of doing business.

The speaker accuses a company of knowingly selling a product infected with AIDS to other countries after it was taken off the market in the US. They claim that the US government allowed this to happen and that thousands of innocent hemophiliacs have died as a result. Internal documents allegedly show that the company was aware of the contamination. The government is criticized for not taking action against the company and for being involved in a cover-up. The speaker also highlights the conflict of interest within the FDA, stating that a significant portion of its budget comes from the pharmaceutical industry.

The speaker accuses a company of knowingly selling a product infected with AIDS to other countries after it was taken off the market in the US. They claim that the US government allowed this to happen and thousands of innocent people, including hemophiliacs and their family members, have died as a result. Internal documents allegedly prove that the company was aware of the contamination. The government is criticized for not taking action against the company and for being involved in a cover-up. The speaker also highlights the conflict of interest within the FDA, stating that a significant portion of its budget comes from the pharmaceutical industry it is supposed to regulate.

The speaker accuses a company of knowingly selling a product infected with AIDS to other countries after it was taken off the market in the US. They claim that the US government allowed this to happen and thousands of innocent people, including hemophiliacs and their family members, have died as a result. Internal documents allegedly show that the company was aware of the contamination. The government is criticized for not taking action against the company and for being involved in a cover-up. The speaker also highlights the conflict of interest within the FDA, stating that a significant portion of its budget comes from the pharmaceutical industry it is supposed to regulate.

The speaker accuses a company of knowingly selling a product infected with AIDS to other countries after it was taken off the market in the US. They claim that the US government allowed this to happen and thousands of innocent people, including hemophiliacs and their family members, have died as a result. Internal documents allegedly prove that the company was aware of the contamination. The government is criticized for not taking action against the company and for being involved in a cover-up. The speaker also highlights the conflict of interest within the FDA, stating that a significant portion of its budget comes from the pharmaceutical industry it is supposed to regulate.

Pfizer is being sued for defrauding the government, but they claim they did not commit fraud. They argue they provided what the government requested, even if it was a faulty product distributed worldwide. This information is crucial and not widely known.

The speaker accuses a company of knowingly selling a product infected with AIDS to other countries after it was taken off the market in the US. They claim that the US government allowed this to happen and thousands of innocent people, including hemophiliacs and their family members, have died as a result. Internal documents allegedly prove that the company was aware of the contamination. The government is criticized for not taking action against the company and for being involved in a cover-up. The speaker also highlights the conflict of interest within the FDA, stating that a significant portion of its budget comes from the pharmaceutical industry it is supposed to regulate.

The speaker accuses a company of knowingly selling a product infected with AIDS to other countries after it was taken off the market in the US. They claim that the US government allowed this to happen and thousands of innocent people, including hemophiliacs and their family members, have died as a result. Internal documents allegedly prove that the company was aware of the contamination. The government is criticized for not taking action against the company and for being involved in a cover-up. The speaker also highlights the conflict of interest within the FDA, stating that a significant portion of its budget comes from the pharmaceutical industry it is supposed to regulate.