reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I've seen corporate frauds on Wall Street, and when they get caught, they don't admit it. They continue to lie and convince investors to hold on, just like what's happening now. Whether it was accidental or intentional, the data shows a cover-up and criminal negligence. In my experience, regulators would step in, but here, the population is unaware. We need to spread this information because most people don't know what's happening. Once enough people are aware, things can change. We can't rely on anyone to save us. It's no surprise they approved the vaccine for childhood schedules because they want immunity.

The speaker discusses the tactics used by industries to spread disinformation when scientific findings go against their interests. They mention examples from various industries, such as coal, gas, energy, agriculture, and pharmaceuticals. The speaker believes that the pharmaceutical industry is the most skilled and devastating practitioner of these tactics. They describe tactics like "the blitz," where doctors and scientists who support inconvenient science are harassed. The speaker shares their personal experience of being targeted by the pharmaceutical industry and the censorship they faced on platforms like YouTube. They express their commitment to documenting and exposing these tactics in a book.

Former vice president of Pfizer, Speaker 1, shares his insights on the events of early 2020. He noticed inconsistencies in statements made by colleagues and realized something was amiss. The simultaneous lockdowns across multiple countries convinced him that this was a coordinated effort beyond the local level. Speaker 1 accuses those in power of lying and implementing ineffective measures. He believes that the vaccines being administered are intentionally harmful, based on his extensive experience in drug design. He is unafraid of legal action and challenges them to sue him, confident that he would win.

Spike proteins are fake and were made up by John D. Rockefeller, just like germ theory and shedding. Anyone who advocates certain things is under the same system to repeat the same things. If they don't tell you viruses are fake and contagion is a myth, you're being led down the same path. Everyone in the MAHA movement believes in virus theory. Viruses, spike proteins, bio labs, and viruses jumping out of labs are all fake nonsense promoted to keep people in fear. The books "A Farewell to Virology," "Can You Catch a Cold?", and "The Contagion Myth" debunk all of that, but are not shown to people to keep them believing in nonsense. People need to be aware of this.

In the 1940s, Rockefeller doctors were allegedly paid by tobacco companies to promote cigarettes. These companies then invested in nicotine gum, patches, inhalers, and CBD products. Pharmaceutical companies like Johnson & Johnson and GSK, purportedly run by the Rockefellers, are producing these nicotine products. The speaker claims nicotine gums contain polysorbate 80, a chemical also found in vaccines that breaks down the blood-brain barrier. They suggest this is not coincidental. The speaker distrusts doctors and believes the "virus thing" is a lie, asserting that radio wave sickness affected people in 2020 due to technology. They claim medical books attribute this to viruses controlled by the Rockefellers and Rothschilds. The speaker recommends books that discuss pandemics resulting from technology and injections, and another that debunks germs and viruses, tracing the Rockefeller narrative back to the Flexner Report of 1913.

The speaker runs through a list of books and related claims, presenting each as something worth reading for its controversial or alternative perspectives. - The International by Henry Ford: The speaker notes, “If you haven't read this one, Henry Ford talks about how these people own all the school systems.” This is linked to the idea that this ownership explains why certain information isn’t widely read, followed by a claim about unlimited oil being discussed in the same work or in related material. - Radiation and radium: The speaker mentions that this title “goes into how radiation is actually beneficial, like radium,” presenting it as a fun fact within the material. - Raw diets and animals: The speaker references content that “goes into raw diets and why you should eat raw, also why animals should eat raw and not cooked garbage,” framing it as a key takeaway from the discussed sources. - World Without Cancer by G. Edward Griffin: The speaker cites this book as part of the referenced readings. - Story of B-17 and apricot seeds: The speaker highlights this title, noting the comparison to conventional cancer treatments. Specifically, “Obviously, chemo is what they normally give people instead of giving them apricots.” - Invisible Rainbow: The speaker summarizes this work as addressing how “Wi Fi and wireless technology is the main culprit of all the pandemics,” adding, “Obviously, they're not gonna tell you that,” and asserting, “They make up fake viruses.” - Can you catch a cold? Daniel Roitos: The speaker lists this as another recommended or discussed book. - Dirty electricity: Included among the cited readings or topics. - The peanut allergy epidemic: The speaker references this issue as part of the broader discussion on health and science. - Allergies and vaccines: The speaker claims, “All the allergies coming from the vaccines,” presenting it as a point these sources emphasize that “they’ll never tell anybody.” - Deliberate dumbing down of America: The speaker ends with this title, tying it all together with the idea that “All ties back to now.” Overall, the speaker is cataloging a set of books and claims that challenge mainstream science and public health narratives, emphasizing themes such as influence over institutions, unconventional views on radiation and diet, alternative cancer treatments, and supposed links between wireless tech, pandemics, vaccines, and societal decline. The list juxtaposes provocative assertions with specific book titles and authors to underscore a common thread of skepticism toward established institutions and scientific consensus.

The talk traces a throughline from mid-20th century to today around nicotine products and the medical establishment, tying financial and political power to how health is marketed and regulated. - In the 1940s, Rockefeller doctors are described as being paid by tobacco companies to promote cigarette smoking. The argument then extends that tobacco companies realized they wouldn’t endure indefinitely, so they sought to keep influence by steering doctors to promote nicotine replacements—nicotine gum and nicotine patches—and they expanded into other nicotine deliveries, including inhalers and CBD products. - The narrative continues by asserting that, by 2025, pharmaceutical companies Johnson & Johnson and GSK are producing all of these nicotine products. It labels these same brands as wanting global vaccination and depopulation and claims they are run by the Rockefellers. It further asserts that another Rockefeller is involved in controlling the medical system and its connections to tobacco. - A chemical claim is raised: polysorbate eighty is found in nicotine gums, and this is described as the same chemical used in vaccines to break down the blood–brain barrier. The claim is made that polysorbate 80 is a modified neurotoxin nanoparticle used in nicotine products and ivermectin, suggesting a link between these products and broader vaccine technologies. - The speaker questions trust in doctors, noting a contrast between ongoing virus narratives and supposed alternative explanations. A claim is made that radio wave sickness has affected people since 2020 and that medical books describe viruses as being manipulated by the Rockefellers and Rothschilds. - The discussion references a recommended reading list: a book about pandemics resulting from new forms of technology and the rollout of injections, and Tom Conlin’s The Contagion Myth, which is said to debunk germs and viruses and the Rockefeller narrative. It notes this discourse traces back to the Flexner Report of 1913. - The closing sentiment frames a choice for the audience: decide whether to believe the stated lies or to move forward, with the implication that the path chosen will determine one’s understanding of health, medicine, and the role of powerful families in shaping medical narratives. In sum, the speaker weaves together claims of Rockefeller influence over doctors, tobacco and nicotine products, pharmaceutical dominance in nicotine delivery by 2025, chemical links to vaccines, alleged misinformation about viruses and “radio wave sickness,” and recommended literature that challenges mainstream germ theory and historic medical authority.

Speaker 0 asserts that the design of the molecular structures in vaccines and injections has no purpose other than to injure and kill. Drawing on 30 years of experience in rational drug design, they say every component in a vial is chosen by someone with specific objectives (e.g., how quickly absorbed, how long it lasts, where it distributes in the body) and that these components are not random or natural products. They declare the ingredients to be toxic by design and intentionally harmful. This, they claim, fits with what they call “the lie” about the pandemic, arguing there wasn’t a real pandemic. According to Speaker 0, the pandemic’s purpose was to damage the economy, train people to comply under a mock emergency, and compel people to get vaccinated. They warn that if people do nothing, speak up less, and simply follow directives, they will lose their freedom and then their lives. They allege that a self-appointed group of very rich people desires a much smaller global population than 8,000,000,000 people, and they claim to be able to deduce the script behind these events. The speaker urges listeners to start talking to anyone and everyone relentlessly, insisting that this situation is not going away. They warn that without protest and refusal, people will first lose their freedom and then their lives.

The speaker points out that major media outlets like CNBC, Fox, and CNN are owned by Vanguard and BlackRock, who are also the top shareholders of vaccine manufacturers Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, and Moderna. They mention that Vanguard and BlackRock are also the top shareholders of flight companies that have implemented strict travel restrictions and of junk food companies. The speaker suggests that this control extends to social media platforms like Meta (formerly Facebook), Snapchat, Twitter, and Google, which are all pushing the same narrative as the media. They conclude that Vanguard and BlackRock are behind it all.

The speaker believes the COVID pandemic exposed the failure and corruption of the global elite, who maintain power by controlling information and suppressing dissident voices. They claim the elite overhyped fear of a virus they helped create to push gene therapy and gain control, while sabotaging early treatment, denying natural immunity and vaccine injuries, causing economic devastation, and destroying lives. The speaker has assembled dissident voices who have paid a price for offering a different perspective. These individuals come from diverse backgrounds but share the attribute that their eyes have been opened.

The speaker expresses concern about Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates, questioning why they are not held accountable for their actions. They discuss their personal experiences with Bill Gates and highlight the suspicious funding and agenda behind his actions. The speaker emphasizes the importance of accuracy and fact-checking, mentioning their organization's extensive resources and team of experts. They mention the term "malinformation" coined by the government to label inconvenient but true information. The speaker provides evidence of cynical behavior and self-interest from Fauci and Gates, particularly regarding the drug Remdesivir. They encourage readers to examine the documented patterns of behavior and read the book, which includes QR codes for easy access to source documents. The speaker also mentions the significant number of copies sold despite lack of publicity.

- Speaker 0 highlights “the most popular trends on social media sponsored by Big Pharma” and claims “it's all made by Big Pharma.” - It cites “Ivermectin drug induced liver injury causing liver failure, blindness, and infertility.” - It mentions “the nicotine push,” allegedly “backed by big pharma,” and references “peptides, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, same ones who make vaccines.” - It references “Bill Gates” and “Rockefeller,” including “Muppets turning their tongues blue, methylene blue, John D. Rockefeller, product of chemotherapy and synthetic dyes.” - It asserts “Rockefeller's and the vitamins the pharmaceutical industry and the government pushing the pharmaceutical vitamins.” - It mentions “global vaccination programs,” by “the same people who make all the products I just mentioned” who “also wanna globally vaccinate and depopulate the world.” - It ends urging reading “Murder by Injection, keyword murder, by Eustace Mullins” as “the most important book you're ever gonna read so you can understand what we're living in of the monopoly of the medical system and how it controls all these other systems and then sells it back to the people without them knowing.”

Billions of dollars have been invested in vaccines, saving millions of lives. However, there is a conspiracy theory that suggests the intention is to profit from vaccines rather than saving lives. The speaker reveals that the return on investment for these vaccinations over the past two decades is an impressive 20 to 1, making it a highly profitable venture. This contradicts the conspiracy theory and highlights the economic benefits of vaccines.

This is a conspiracy involving corporations, government, media, and big tech players. They aimed to create a COVID surveillance economy, but the vaccine has hindered their plans. The evidence against them is growing, and resistance is increasing. We need to convince those who doubt us that we are not conspiracy theorists. Wall Street is showing interest in this, and capital will flow into this space. It's sad but true. Social proof can convince people who don't want to look at the data. If you think everything is fine, know that people are waking up and investing in this cause. It's time to wake up.

Secret societies are behind evil actions, enslaving people with lies and lockdowns. COVID-19 can be treated with proven medications, not experimental vaccines pushed by Bill Gates, Rockefeller, Rothschild, Klaus Schwab, and George Soros. Stop forcing vaccinations for safety. Stand up and speak the truth, don't be blinded by money.

The speaker questions the theory that the origin of SARS-CoV-2 was a bat and pangolin in a Wuhan market. They mention that Moderna modified patent applications in 2019 to include the justification for a vaccine against a non-existent respiratory pathogen. The speaker emphasizes the premeditated nature of the alleged plan to create a universal vaccine template using coronavirus. They claim that this plan was discussed in September 2019 and intended to generate profit. The speaker accuses this act of being an act of domestic terrorism and biological and chemical warfare on humanity, as admitted in a 2015 National Academy of Sciences publication. The motive behind this act is said to be financial gain.

Financial analysts have found that money can influence people's decisions regarding vaccination. One analyst shared an anecdote about a friend who initially dismissed their concerns but changed their tune after seeing a video of the analyst discussing the issue with Steve Bannon. The friend became alarmed when they learned that the analyst was meeting with hedge fund professionals to raise funds for their cause. This incident made the friend realize that even Wall Street is starting to pay attention to the issue. The analyst emphasized that when money is involved, people's priorities can shift, and even those who have been vaccinated may change their stance if it means making a profit.

The speaker asserts that COVID-19 shots do more than affect the immune system; they can damage the brain and worsen mental health. They claim a wave of studies shows sharp increases in various strokes: ischemic strokes up to 44%, hemorrhagic strokes up to 50%, and transient ischemic attacks (mini strokes) up to 67%. They also report increases in neurological and autoimmune conditions, including myasthenia gravis up 71% and Alzheimer’s disease up 22%. Cognitive impairment is claimed to have risen by nearly 138%, while depression is up 68%, anxiety disorders up 44%, and sleep disorders up 93%. The speaker links all of these increases to “toxic spike protein accumulation and persistence in the brain.” The speaker states this is not a conspiracy theory and cites what they describe as documented peer‑reviewed research and studies by experts. They name epidemiologist Nicholas Holcher, who allegedly says that using mRNA to hijack cells in various organ systems to produce a highly toxic spike protein that persists in the body for months or years was “one of the worst ideas in medical history.” The speaker then asks, “So what can you do?” as a transition to presumably recommendations or actions, though no specific actions are listed in the provided segment.

The speaker believes the COVID-19 vaccine rollout was motivated by financial gain. They claim the goal was to convince everyone they needed the vaccine to generate enormous profits, which they succeeded in doing. The speaker references information that has emerged since the vaccine rollout, including deaths and blood clots. They specifically mention seeing a show called "Die Suddenly" and observing blood clots that they associate with the vaccine.

Speaker 0 asserts that truth is out and that scientists are now confirming long-suspected effects of the COVID-19 shots beyond the immune system, specifically that they can damage the brain and devastate mental health. The claim is that the evidence is overwhelming and that a new wave of studies has revealed significant increases in various neurological and psychiatric conditions, all linked to the presence of toxic spike protein accumulation and persistence in the brain. The summary of claimed study findings includes: - Ischemic strokes: up forty-four percent. - Hemorrhagic strokes: up fifty percent. - Transient ischemic strokes (mini strokes): up sixty-seven percent. - Myasthenia gravis, described as a debilitating autoimmune condition: up over seventy-one percent. - Alzheimer’s disease: up twenty-two percent. - Cognitive impairment: up nearly one hundred and thirty-eight percent. - Depression: up over sixty-eight percent. - Anxiety disorders: up nearly forty-four percent. - Sleep disorders: up over ninety-three percent. Speaker 0 links all of these increases to one cause: toxic spike protein accumulation and persistence in the brain. The statement "This isn't a conspiracy theory" is used to bolster the claim that there is documented peer-reviewed research and published studies supporting these observations. The speaker cites epidemiologist Nicholas Holcher as an example of an expert who has commented on the issue. The quote attributed to Holcher describes using mRNA to hijack cells in various organ systems to produce a highly toxic spike protein that persists in the body for months or even years, and characterizes this approach as one of the worst ideas in medical history. In closing, Speaker 0 poses a question, "So what can you do?" signaling a transition from presenting the alleged findings to offering potential actions or recommendations. The overall message is that COVID-19 vaccines are claimed to cause widespread brain toxicity and mental health problems through persistent spike protein, with purported evidence from peer-reviewed studies and expert commentary cited to support the assertions.

The speakers claim the push for a COVID vaccine was motivated by money, and they believe there's a connection between the vaccine and subsequent deaths and blood clots. They express frustration that people aren't acknowledging this connection. One speaker shares a story about a veteran who was allegedly told that the hospital treating him was not allowed to connect his adverse side effects to the vaccine, even when listed as side effects. They say corporations don't want to talk about it because they mandated the vaccine. They believe people who got vaccinated don't want to admit they made a bad decision, leading them to deny any link between the vaccine and increased mortality rates, strokes, cancer, and heart attacks. One speaker recalls being gaslit by a former prime minister who denied coercing anyone into getting vaccinated, despite restrictions placed on the unvaccinated. Another speaker says they were misrepresented on CNN during their own recovery from COVID.

The speaker salutes unvaccinated individuals, calling them courageous for standing against a trillion-dollar propaganda machine and telling the government, bosses, jobs, and businesses to "off." The speaker believes everyone had a choice regarding vaccination, even if it meant facing tough decisions like losing a job, business, or family. They claim that vaccinated individuals "sold their soul" for a price, while the unvaccinated lost everything but kept their integrity. The speaker generally distrusts vaccinated people and trusts unvaccinated people. They believe that in a future pandemic, vaccinated individuals will throw others under the bus to protect themselves, their jobs, money, and titles.

The discussion traces a long, shadowy arc in the development of modern vaccines and medicine, arguing that rapid COVID-19 vaccine progress rests on over a century of influence by powerful interests rather than sudden breakthroughs. - The narrative centers on John D. Rockefeller, who became America’s first billionaire in 1913, the same year the Federal Reserve was created. It frames Rockefeller as leveraging his oil wealth to monopolize medicine, promoting prescription drugs while vilifying natural and holistic remedies. The claim is that Rockefeller used strategic philanthropy (Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, established 1901; Rockefeller Foundation, 1913) to push laboratory-based, drug-centered medicine, marginalize herbalism and naturopathy, and steer doctors toward pharmaceuticals. The effect, according to the speakers, was to keep people sick so they would return for ongoing treatments rather than cures. - The timeline continues with the rise of the pharmaceutical industry from the 1920s to 1940s, described as moving into synthetic drugs with Rockefeller guidance. Natural remedies were said to be non-patentable while synthetic drugs could be patented, creating a business incentive for ongoing, chronic treatment rather than cures. - The conversation shifts to regulatory dynamics, arguing that regulation became regulatory capture from the 1930s to 1960s, with the FDA functioning as a gatekeeper increasingly populated by former pharma professionals. The FDA’s integrity is debated through the example of Dr. Francis Kelsey, who resisted approving thalidomide; the drug was later linked to birth defects worldwide, and Kelsey’s stance is presented as a rare early stand for public safety. - In the 1970s and 1980s, the narrative asserts growing corporate influence: pharma lobbies expand, advertising budgets explode, and medicine becomes a growth industry. The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 is cited as enabling private patents on publicly funded research, tying universities to pharma interests and shaping medical education toward pharmaceutical solutions. Direct-to-consumer advertising is highlighted as a turning point in the 1990s, pressuring doctors through patient demand spurred by TV ads. - The discussion includes a first-hand account from a former pharmaceutical sales representative, Lisa Prada, who describes bribes and perks (golf outings, concerts, strip clubs, etc.) to influence prescribing, and asserts that patients were often treated as means to corporate ends. - Kim Bright, founder of Brightcore Nutrition, joins to discuss current health issues, arguing that the pharmaceutical industry prioritizes profits over patient well-being. She notes that the Rockefeller Foundation funded COVID-19 vaccine efforts (she cites $55 million) and argues the foundation and industry continued to push medical interventions globally. She notes that the FDA’s public acknowledgment of COVID vaccine-related child deaths is incongruent with whistleblowers’ claims and autopsy data. - The program underscores the idea that prescription drugs are the third leading cause of death in the United States and Europe, citing studies on gut microbiome disruption from medications like antibiotics and acid-reducing drugs (dysbiosis) as a major contributor to chronic disease. - The gut microbiome is emphasized as central to health. Dr. David Perlmutter’s work on the gut-brain connection is referenced, including criticism faced for linking diet and fermented foods to health outcomes. Kimchi is highlighted as a powerful antimicrobial and a potential anti-aging agent in cellular studies. The hosts discuss kimchi’s health benefits, including improved digestion, immune function, and weight management. - Brightcore promotes Kimchi One capsules as a convenient alternative for Americans who dislike traditional kimchi, claiming benefits such as reduced bloating, better digestion, improved hair and skin, and weight loss. A discount offer is advertised: 25% off online, up to 50% off with a phone order, free shipping, and a free vitamin D3 with the first 100 callers, using the code provided. - The conversation closes with reflections on the do-not-mistake-the-system dynamic, optimism about changes in medicine, and calls for removing dependency on processed foods and advertising-driven medicine, with an acknowledgment of RFK Jr.’s activism against pharmaceutical ads on television.

The speaker questions the idea of consensus, stating that if there is a scientific consensus, it is obscurantism because it hinders progress and new discoveries. They argue that the success of mass injections is a business and administrative success, but not a success in treating the intended problem. The speaker claims that doctors should speak up about being misled regarding the mRNA injections and that future injections will likely be the same. They hope that their book will spark debates and put an end to widespread mRNA injections and disguised mandatory vaccinations. The speaker also emphasizes the importance of finding ways to treat the victims and believes that their work will be successful.

The speaker believes COVID vaccine programs should be stopped. They are astounded by the number of papers critical of the vaccine or showing negative effects. The speaker claims a group of researchers funded by Pfizer and the NIH bullies editors to retract papers with negative findings about the vaccine. They assert the number of retractions is appalling. According to the speaker, in one instance where an editor resisted, Nature Springer bought the journal and retracted the paper. The speaker states that this is what they have been dealing with.