reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speakers engage in a conversation about various topics, including a video that was edited. They discuss the mutation of the virus and the need for new vaccines. There is a request for an apology, and the conversation becomes heated. They also mention percentages related to race and gender representation. The video is deleted, but the person who deleted it had a hidden camera recording. The conversation ends with a mention of Mark Cuban wanting to "f" with someone.

The speaker discusses the game show "Is It Racist?" and shares personal experiences of being tokenized based on race, gender, and age. They mention the outsourcing of call centers and make a comment about Haiti.

The speaker begins by making offensive racial remarks and claims that the jokes were written by Whoopi Goldberg. They proceed to make more offensive comments and insults towards others. The speaker is confronted about their language, but continues with their offensive remarks. The transcript abruptly ends.

Taking off. No posting allowed on Target property. I'm asking you to leave. When these people go viral, they lose their jobs. He doesn't allow it anymore. I've got her face and nametag; this is her last day at Target. She just gave me the middle finger. I came all the way from England, and now she’s lost her job just like that. What an idiot.

The speaker discusses an unnamed woman whose teleprompter went off, and she "didn't do well." The speaker relates to this, saying it has happened to them, and "you have to be able to do it." The speaker believes the woman "shouldn't be there anyway." The speaker then says "North Carolina is so bad," and mentions Kamala Harris was there for 3 hours today.

The speaker notes that people might be surprised that he has never interacted with Donald Trump face to face, though that is about to change. The speaker then references a statement made last month by Trump, who suggested that the speaker turned black recently for political purposes, questioning a core part of his identity. The speaker dismisses this as the same old tired playbook and declines to comment further. The speaker then expresses confusion as to why a shot wasn't taken. The speaker reiterates that people might be surprised that he has never interacted with Trump.

The speaker briefly mentions Ukraine and Russia, suggesting that a nuclear war would be worth it to support democracy and get vaccinated. They then mention shopping at Target in the pride section, looking for a shirt for their openly gay 6-year-old. The speaker abruptly ends their statement, expressing self-hatred and mentioning something about a vaccine for white supremacy. The moderator interrupts and thanks the speaker, asking them to move aside for the next person. The video ends with the moderator announcing a 5-minute break.

The speaker addresses the audience and points out a waitress named Shay. He explains that Shay asked him about his hat, which supports Trump, while he was at Hooters. He expresses frustration that some women don't act professionally and mentions that he was spending money at the establishment. The speaker believes that Shay's behavior was triggered by his hat and mentions that he is filming the incident. He mentions calling the police and continues to express his frustration. The speaker plans to inform the manager about the situation and hopes Shay brings the manager.

The speaker questions whether someone is willing to apologize for a hate crime and expresses surprise at the prosecution being only for vandalism. They mention that the person in question has information.

The speakers discuss the topic of cultural appropriation and the confusion surrounding what is considered acceptable. They mention how pronouncing words differently can be seen as cultural appropriation, and they debate whether it is wrong for a white person to imitate a black accent. They also touch on the issue of dressing up as different cultures and the importance of respecting traditions. The conversation becomes heated when one speaker expresses frustration with another's ignorance and lack of concern for offending other cultures. Overall, they discuss the need for understanding and respect when it comes to cultural appropriation.

The speaker states that an uninvited individual acted disrespectfully by being near the family, demonstrating their character. The speaker believes this person knows it is inappropriate to be near the family. The speaker asserts that actions speak louder than words. According to the speaker, political operatives are trying to turn the situation into a political issue involving hate, bigotry, and racism. The speaker claims that conservative operatives have been posting about the case nonstop.

A video went viral showing a young Kansas City Chiefs fan wearing a native headdress and what appeared to be blackface. However, it was later revealed that the other half of his face was painted red, not black. Many people criticized the media for jumping to conclusions and slandering the young fan. The speaker warns viewers about the war for information and encourages them to seek out reliable sources. They also mention that conservative content creators are being shadow banned and urges support for conservative voices. The speaker concludes by thanking viewers and promoting their social media accounts.

The speaker asks where the boys' section is and is directed to it. They express surprise multiple times, questioning if certain items are also part of the boys' section. They comment on finding a boy shirt and confirm that they are indeed in the boys' section. They express frustration and disbelief, suggesting that this is pushing an agenda. They mention being at Target and comment on the availability of items that allow someone to look like their sister.

The speaker engages in a disrespectful conversation with Bob Iger, using offensive language and insults. They request to call Bob Iger for assistance in a game show, but it turns out they don't actually need help and confidently state they will win the prize. The speaker then expresses their opinion about people who prioritize appearance over morality.

Speaker 0 states it is not okay to be white because white people have "done too much bad" and should "try not to be white." Speaker 1 questions if these statements constitute hate speech, imagining the reaction if someone expressed similar sentiments toward their skin color. Speaker 1 believes only white people are held accountable for their words and actions, and that some people are striving for supremacy rather than equality. Speaker 1 wonders if the person who made the initial statements is gainfully employed and if it would be wrong to find out where they work and inform their employer.

The speaker states that an uninvited individual acted disrespectfully by being near the family, demonstrating their character. The speaker believes this person knows it's inappropriate to be near the family. The speaker asserts that actions speak louder than words. The speaker accuses political operatives of trying to turn the situation into a political issue of hate, bigotry, and racism. The speaker claims conservative operatives have been posting nonstop about the case.

A person asks why the speaker called the police on two men at CVS. The speaker explains that it is CVS policy to call the police if someone shoplifts. The person questions if it's worth risking someone's life for a low salary. The speaker believes there was no risk and ends the conversation. The person asks for the speaker's name, but the speaker refuses to give it due to being recorded. The person accuses the speaker of inciting violence against the two black men. The speaker mentions that one of the men had a warrant but was let go by the police. The person reminds the speaker that they work with black people.

The speaker questions the racial identity of a woman who transitioned from identifying as Indian to black. Another person clarifies that she has always identified as black. The speaker expresses confusion and suggests further investigation. The conversation becomes tense as the question is repeated.

I just got kicked out of Target for wearing a hat, and I was told to go back to my country. This made me question where freedom of speech and the right to wear what I want are. People can dye their hair or get tattoos without issue, but my hat seems to provoke a reaction. Everyone should want their country to thrive, regardless of political views. If people are so concerned about freedom, why aren't they practicing it? It feels contradictory to advocate for freedom while restricting it based on differing opinions. Can anyone explain this?

A person asked a congresswoman if she would apologize for racist rhetoric inferring that white men should be put on a terror watch list solely based on their skin color. The person asked if she truly thinks white men are the greatest terror threat facing America.

Cory Booker was mentioned and the speaker was asked for their thoughts on him saying "kick them in the shins." The speaker mistakenly thought it was Eric Holder who said that, and made a comment about all of them looking alike.

A coworker excitedly informed the speaker that Michelle Obama is running for president. The speaker questions why they should vote for her just because she is black, expressing frustration with black people falling for such assumptions. The coworker takes offense and accuses the speaker of being a "coon" or a supporter of racism. The speaker asks if Michelle Obama is really running and requests someone to research it, also questioning if she is transgender.

An individual is accused of writing a swastika on a Tesla using a key. The Tesla owner states that the act is a hate crime and that the key is being fingerprinted by the police to track down the individual. They also mention that Facebook tracked the individual down. The Tesla owner suggests the individual apologize to Facebook for writing the swastika. The individual apologizes, stating they have nothing against the car or the owner, but may have something against Elon Musk. The Tesla owner clarifies they own the car and it was bought and paid for. The individual admits their actions were misguided and unintentional.

It's unfortunate another child's bad choice will affect him for life. The speaker has compassion for every human being. This is not a race issue, nor a black and white issue. The speaker does not want the situation politicized. The speaker does not appreciate online remarks from people who weren't present during the event.

Speaker 0 asks Steve how he is doing, but Steve makes a comment about Speaker 0's hair, which Speaker 0 finds offensive as a black person. Speaker 0 explains that they face similar microaggressions at work and asks Steve to stop making comments about their hair. Speaker 0 mentions that they don't need Steve to constantly clarify that their hair is different each time, as it makes them uncomfortable. Speaker 0 emphasizes that they are not seeking validation, just asking for respect and understanding.