reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker argues that the idea of carbon dioxide (CO2) being pollution is flawed. They claim that CO2 is not harmful, as humans naturally exhale it and human emissions make up a very small percentage of greenhouse gases. They suggest that labeling CO2 as pollution allows for regulatory control over all aspects of life. The speaker also mentions that CO2 has actually been beneficial for the environment, leading to greener plants and improved agricultural yields. They question whether CO2 is truly pollution and argue that the alleged environmental benefits are fictional if it is not.

In Denmark, cows are reportedly dying and producing less milk because BeauVer has been added to cattle food. BeauVer was mandated to be added to the food in Denmark from 10/01/2025, and farmers are now reporting reduced milk production, with some cows becoming sick and needing euthanasia. An official investigation into the substance has been launched. The speaker notes this issue ties to a broader narrative they discussed previously, accusing climate advocates of pushing to add bovine additives so cows would fart and burp less. According to the speaker, Bill Gates is behind promoting substances like Bovar, arguing the goal is to move toward synthetic beef and to stop cows from farting and burping. The speaker claims it is now mandatory to add Bovar on all farms in Denmark, and asserts that it has negative effects on cows, with an official investigation underway. The speaker urges stopping this “craziness” and retreating from meddling with nature, arguing the agenda aims to attack humans by having bovir enter human tissues through consumption. They claim bovir contains a substance called tree n o p that attacks human fertility. The speaker connects these events to a broader transhumanism and elite agenda to hijack human evolution and create synthetic humans, including lab-born babies. They indicate there is much more to discuss on this topic and mention giving an in-depth lecture in November, with a link in the comments. In summary, the main points asserted are: BeauVer is being added to Danish cattle feed since 10/01/2025, resulting in cow health problems and reduced milk output; an official investigation is underway; the speaker attributes the policy to climate-change activism and Bill Gates, claiming it aims to reduce cattle methane emissions; they claim bovir/bovar is harmful to humans through tissue exposure and fertility impacts, tying this to a transhumanist agenda; a forthcoming lecture is promised with more details.

- "new research happening at the University of Nebraska Lincoln is focusing on the pastures where cattle graze and the role that it can play in carbon capture." - "They've not accounted for the capture part. They've only accounted for methane being lost, and everything else is at balance. Turns out that's not really true." - "the soil and plants that grow in it can capture CO2, and Erickson's team has found that capture, helped out by cattle grazing and manure, can far outweigh the emissions from cattle." - "With adequate precipitation, we're actually seeing that grasslands can take up more CO2 or more carbon in the in the soil and the plants that offsets the CO2 that cattle are producing, but also offsets the methane." - "Ericsson and Switzer both hope this research won't just correct assumptions about ag's role in climate"

Cows are not major contributors to climate change. They eat grass, which absorbs carbon dioxide, and their methane emissions come from the carbon in the grass. Industries like transportation and electricity generation are bigger culprits. Cows have been part of a natural cycle for millions of years, providing humans with nutritious food. Raising cows regeneratively can benefit both humans and the planet, despite attempts to blame them for climate change.

- Climate change is a fact. - Humans are not causing it. - The cow farts. It's not the cows. - NASA knows this. - Over 90% of the c o two, there is an increase in c o two. - Is there more c o two in the atmosphere now than there was ten years, twenty, fifty, a hundred years ago? The answer is absolutely yes. - Is it a bad thing? The answer is no. - Is it the most we've ever had? We're right about four forty parts per million right now. - The oceans are warming from underneath, not from the top. Warm water holds less gas.

The speaker argues that life on Earth is in crisis due to crop failure, social and ecological collapse, and mass extinction, framing these as part of Extinction Rebellion’s climate alarmist narrative and a broader political and financial “climate industrial complex” that aims to control purchases, diet, and travel in the name of sustainability and net-zero emissions. They contend that people rely on governments and the media rather than data, and promise to show that temperatures fluctuate, are not unprecedented, and that natural disasters are not getting worse. They claim climate data is unreliable and that CO2 plays a small role in climate, while presenting scientific evidence that we are not in a climate crisis. Using a 65-million-year temperature graph, the speaker states the Earth today is in a cool period and is coming out of an ice age, noting that life thrived in much warmer times without human CO2 emissions. They assert that over the last two thousand years there have been two warm periods and two cold periods, including the Roman warm period, the cold Dark Ages, the medieval warm period, and the Little Ice Age, with current warming described as a recovery from the Little Ice Age. The three degrees Fahrenheit of warming cited by scientists and the media is described as not unprecedented and not cause for alarm due to ongoing fluctuations. The speaker argues that warming and CO2 emissions have not made natural disasters more frequent or violent, citing hurricane and wildfire data. They reference a graph from the Bulletin of the American Urological Society showing a slight downward trend in US hurricanes per year since 1900, and a North Atlantic hurricane intensity graph from 1920 to 2016 showing no trend. They claim the 2014 US National Climate Assessment presents an illusory upward trend by focusing on a red-highlighted portion. They also claim that US and global acres burned by wildfires have been decreasing since 1900. Regarding data reliability, the speaker highlights a gap between climate model predictions and observed data, noting that temperature measurements from weather balloons align with satellite data, while climate models over-predict warming. They discuss the urban heat island effect, giving Paris as an example where city temperatures are much higher than surrounding rural areas, suggesting data can be biased to frighten the public. The speaker argues CO2 is not the climate control knob, as it is only 0.04% of the atmosphere, and that historical CO2 levels have been far higher than today. They cite MIT oceanographer Carl Wunsch (spelled as Karl Wench) to claim that when oceans warm, more CO2 is released, and when oceans are cold, CO2 is absorbed. A graph is described showing CO2 rising centuries after temperature increases, implying temperature drives CO2 more than the reverse. They acknowledge CO2 may have some small influence but emphasize many other factors—volcanic activity, cosmic rays, and the sun—and claim limiting CO2 would largely stunt biodiversity with little effect on temperature. The speaker argues CO2 is essential for photosynthesis and that farmers use high CO2 in greenhouses to boost crop yields, illustrating CO2 as a life-giving gas and stating it would green the planet and increase food supply if CO2 increases. They conclude that climate change is an existential threat in Western discourse but offer this as historical context from Aztecs to the Salem witch trials. They mention carbon taxes and individual CO2 budgets as signs of climate issues infiltrating daily life and frame their conclusion as pursuing truth by examining data themselves. In summary, the speaker presents historical temperature variability, critiques of data and models, downplays CO2’s role, highlights CO2’s benefits to plant growth, and asserts that the climate crisis is a hoax to be opposed by scrutinizing data personally.

The speaker discusses the opposition to farming practices in the Netherlands, which are blamed for climate change. They argue that it doesn't make sense to blame agriculture when it has been a successful industry for centuries. The speaker questions the proposed alternatives, such as wind turbines, solar panels, and synthetic foods, which they view as a manufactured and unnatural solution. They believe that these alternatives are not as beneficial for the environment as the cows grazing in the fields. The speaker concludes by stating that deep down, everyone knows that the opposition's claims are false.

Cattle are the most significant ruminants, with around 100 million in the U.S. today, a number consistent since before European settlement when bison and pronghorn antelope were prevalent. The contribution of ruminants to global warming hasn't changed over the last 250 years. Biogenic methane from livestock is distinct from fossil methane. While both types of methane are chemically the same, biogenic methane is part of a cycle where carbon is recycled. Plants absorb CO2, which cows then convert into methane. This methane, after about ten years, is oxidized back into CO2, which is not new carbon but recycled carbon. As long as livestock numbers remain stable, methane production and destruction balance out, meaning there is no additional warming from livestock. This challenges the prevailing narrative about livestock's impact on climate change.

Speaker 0 says that the richest people in the world have recently started telling people they need to produce more energy, which they find “a little weird” because the same group has spent at least the past fifteen years—since Al Gore became famous—telling people the opposite. Speaker 0 claims they said energy is not the source of life or the base of civilization, but instead the cause of humanity’s downfall: the destruction of the earth and the main reason for climate change. Speaker 0 further states that CO2 is the reason it is getting warmer and that this warming happens because climate cycles are part of nature, including the example that glaciers existed and now do not. Speaker 0 says this group previously taught that burning fossil fuels was not only bad for the environment but a sin, and that society should be organized around being “carbon conscious” because they “love the earth.” Speaker 0 then claims that the same people, including Larry Fink of BlackRock, have since said they are going to take a pause on concern about global warming and that society needs more electricity. Speaker 0 states that most electricity on Earth is produced by boiling water to move turbines, and that a small portion uses radioactive material in nuclear reactors, while most generation is from coal, then natural gas, and some oil. Speaker 0 characterizes this as essentially industrial-age technology: refining and cleaning, but fundamentally the same process of burning fuel to boil water and generate power. Speaker 0 says these figures who previously framed that technology as inefficient and morally wrong are now calling for a massive expansion of it. Speaker 0 links this shift to AI, describing artificial intelligence as a dramatic, quantum increase in processing power that enables computers to reason and mimic human thinking, replacing a lot of human labor. Speaker 0 states that AI is incredibly demanding of power and will require far more electricity than most people understood. Speaker 0 concludes that society will need to put on hold—and invert—its concerns about global warming in order to build AI.

Cows are a significant source of global emissions, contributing about 6 percent due to methane, a potent greenhouse gas. It is essential to find ways to reduce the environmental impact of cows.

The speaker claims the idea of a climate change disaster is false, stating that it is one of the coldest periods in Earth's history, evidenced by ice at the poles, which was absent for 150 million years previously due to warmer temperatures. They assert that current atmospheric CO2 levels are lower than in most of Earth's history, currently at 420 ppm, and were as low as 180 ppm during the last glacial maximum, close to the point where plants die. The speaker suggests an optimal level for plants is 800-1200 ppm. They claim that CO2 emissions have already resulted in a 30% increase in vegetation growth. The speaker argues that fossil fuels originated from plants extracting CO2 from the atmosphere and oceans. Therefore, humans are merely replacing CO2, preventing plant starvation and ecosystem collapse. Burning fossil fuels for energy is presented as the salvation of life on Earth.

The University of Nebraska's study suggests that raising more cows could help combat carbon emissions because cows are carbon negative, producing more oxygen than methane and carbon. Eating more cheeseburgers or steaks could potentially save the world.

A trial of personal carbon dioxide allowances has concluded in the UK, calculating the UK's annual carbon dioxide production and dividing it per person per day to meet net zero goals. The speaker claims this confirms a previous "conspiracy theory." The speaker states that carbon dioxide is essential for life and plant food, and that climate change concerns are not based on science but on feelings. They claim a daily food allowance of 2,600 grams of carbon dioxide would only allow for 26 grams of red meat, and a cooked breakfast would have to be half-sized. The speaker alleges the system is rigged towards plant-based meals, benefiting billionaires like BlackRock and Bill Gates who are buying farmland for cereals and soy. They further claim plant-based fake meat contains 20 chemical ingredients, many shared with pet food. The World Economic Forum allegedly wants to include carbon dioxide credit trading, allowing the rich to maintain their lifestyles while the poor sell their excess credits. The speaker concludes that the war on livestock is a war on good nutrition based on a lie to enrich billionaires.

In Denmark, cows are reportedly dying and producing less milk after Beauvair was added to their food. The transcript claims Beauvair was mandated to be added to food in Denmark starting October 1, 2025, and that farmers have since reported that cows are producing less milk and that some cows have become sick. The transcript says some farmers have had to euthanize cows and that the farmers believe Beauvair is the cause. The speaker says this topic was discussed previously and describes Beauvair as a substance that “these crazy, climate people want to add to the food so the cows would fart and burp, burp less.” The speaker frames the policy as “hijack[ing] nature,” asserting that natural processes like farting and burping are being targeted in the name of climate change. The speaker also says an official investigation has been launched into the substance. The transcript identifies Bill Gates as being behind Beauvair and similar efforts, asserting that Gates promotes substances like Bovair because he wants “synthetic beef” and wants cows “to stop farting and burping.” The speaker states that the mandate in Denmark has a “bad effect” on cows and says the investigation should stop the “meddling with nature.” The transcript further claims that Beauvair (and a substance within it) affects humans after people consume it. It says the substance gets into tissues that humans eat and claims that Beauvair has been “proven to attack human fertility.” The transcript specifies that a component called “3-NOP” attacks human fertility. The speaker connects these claims to an alleged broader agenda, describing it as part of “transhumanism” and a push to create “synthetic humans,” including attempting to create babies in labs. The speaker portrays the effort as “bigger than this,” describing it as an “elite agenda” to take over human evolution and “basically [attack] us” to “dehumanize not only the animals but also us.” The speaker says they are doing a lecture at the end of November and that viewers can find a link in the comments to discuss the topic in depth.

Speaker 0 questions what climate catastrophists get wrong about CO2. Speaker 1 argues that more CO2 is good for the world and that reducing CO2 is absurd given other problems and projections of lower costs for renewable energy, which he calls clearly a lie. He explains, as a Princeton professor and climate scientist/physicist, that geological history shows we are in a CO2 famine relative to what is normal for plants. He notes that in his country, many greenhouses double or triple the amount of CO2, and though it’s not cheap, it’s worth investing in because plants grow much better, and the quality of flowers and fruits improves. Outside greenhouses, he says plants benefit as well: with more CO2, in addition to greenhouse gains, there is resistance to drought, which is particularly important in Australia’s arid regions. He claims satellites show Australia as a poster child of the greening of the world, especially Western Australia, and expresses disbelief that CO2—a gas that is fundamental to life—has been turned into a threat and described as carbon pollution. He challenges the framing of the issue by noting that humans are made of carbon and we breathe out two pounds of CO2 a day. He references the global population (about 8 billion) and suggests that some argue “people are the real problem” and that there should not be more than a billion people in the world, remarking that in the room many of them do not constitute seven out of eight to reduce the population. Overall, the speaker presents a counter-narrative: CO2 is beneficial for plant growth and drought resilience, greenhouse and agricultural practices capitalize on higher CO2 levels, and concerns about CO2 as a pollutant are misplaced given the current and historical context of atmospheric carbon and human needs.

A video spreading online shows a truck dumping hundreds of chickens at a landfill, with some chickens still alive and walking around. The clip is described as shocking and disturbing, and it prompts questions about whether the birds were handled properly before being transported and disposed of. The Ohio Department of Agriculture says it is aware of the videos and investigating. Officials tell ABC 6 that some of the birds were not euthanized before they were transported and disposed of. The state says it has ordered retraining for workers on proper euthanasia, loading, and disposal procedures. Another claim presented is that the landfill belongs to Republic Services. It is also stated that Cascade Investment owns 35.5% of Republic Services. A further point is made that Cascade Investment is controlled by Bill Gates, described as the same person invested in alternative food technologies. Separately, Bill Gates is quoted discussing burgers made with “Impossible foods” or “Beyond Meat” ground beef. He says that about 50% of the time he has a burger, it is made with these products, which he says have essentially no greenhouse gas emissions. He adds that as these products improve, they are “quite good,” and recommends that people try them.

Speaker 0: The University of Nebraska just completed a study stating the way to save the world on carbon is to raise more cows. Cows are carbon negative; they produce more oxygen than they emit as methane and carbon. The takeaway is to eat more cheeseburgers or steaks to save the world.

Switching to a diet of steak and eggs can provide a significant energy boost, avoiding the carbohydrate crash. A high-protein, high-fat diet helps maintain stable energy levels. Many dismiss the carnivore diet due to claims that animal agriculture contributes to global warming, which is misleading. The real issue lies with factory farming, while regenerative farming practices can be carbon neutral. The notion that eating meat significantly impacts global warming is unfounded and often stems from ideological or financial interests in plant-based alternatives. It's essential to question the validity of these claims, as they often lack measurable evidence. Eating meat won’t affect CO2 levels in any meaningful way.

Certain countries have updated dietary guidelines to decrease red meat consumption due to climate change. The speaker supports changing dietary guidelines in the US to promote healthy eating habits and reduce red meat intake. They emphasize the need for government incentives, education, and moderation in diet choices. Despite enjoying cheeseburgers, the speaker advocates for dietary changes and environmental awareness.

Red meat, specifically cows, is not responsible for climate change. Cows eat grass, which helps regenerate the land. While they do emit methane through burping, the carbon in that methane comes from the grass they consume, which in turn absorbs atmospheric carbon dioxide through photosynthesis. Cows are part of a natural cycle that has existed for millions of years, along with other ruminant animals like bison and elk. According to a 2016 EPA graphic, cows are not the highest emitters of carbon dioxide or its equivalents. Industries like transportation, electricity generation, coal burning, and technology are the major culprits. Properly raising cows in a regenerative manner can provide humans with high-quality food while not significantly contributing to climate change.

Opportunities in reducing emissions outweigh sacrifices, like phasing out coal mining. Breakthrough Energy invested in Ruminate, an Australian company tackling methane emissions from cows. Cows contribute 6% of global emissions through burping and farting methane. Solutions involve modifying cows or creating beef without them to improve taste, health, and cost.

Cows and other grass-eating species emit methane, a potent greenhouse gas, contributing to about 6% of global emissions. To address this, efforts have been made to create artificial meat, with companies like Impossible and Beyond Meat leading the way. These products, such as the Impossible Burger available at Burger King, offer a slightly healthier option with lower cholesterol. Additionally, they significantly reduce methane emissions, animal cruelty, and the environmental impact of meat consumption on land use.

The speaker argues that climate change is false, citing that the Earth is currently in a cold period with historically low CO2 levels. They claim that the increase in CO2 from fossil fuels is actually beneficial for plant growth, as it was originally taken from the atmosphere by plants. The speaker believes that humans are saving life on Earth by returning CO2 to a more optimal level through burning fossil fuels for energy.