TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Councilmen were approached with unmarked ballots, claiming they were from confused immigrant voters. One councilman mentioned gathering 43 blank ballots and wanting to ensure they were filled out correctly. Another councilman was warned about allegations of voter fraud, including buying ballots at midnight meetings. The conversation implied one councilman paid for 300 ballots in the past. The councilman did not deny the allegations, leading to suspicions of ballot manipulation. Translation: Councilmen were given unmarked ballots supposedly from confused immigrant voters. One councilman mentioned collecting 43 blank ballots to be filled out correctly. Another councilman was warned about allegations of voter fraud, including buying ballots at midnight meetings. The conversation suggested one councilman paid for 300 ballots in the past. The councilman did not deny the allegations, raising concerns about ballot manipulation.

I went to vote for the first time in California, bringing my proof of address and ID. Arriving at a polling place in San Diego, I found a long line and noticed the building's rundown appearance. I spoke with the man in front of me, who was also voting for the first time and had just decided to support Trump. The line kept growing, and I registered to vote on the spot without needing to show ID. I received a green conditional voter registration envelope for my ballot. By the time I left around 4 PM, the line had grown significantly, and I had waited an hour. Those still waiting would likely wait about two hours. I put on my sticker and officially voted in California.

**Spanish Summary:** Un grupo está registrando votantes hispanos en Phoenix. Una señora ya está registrada por su trabajo. Otra persona puso que quería votar en una aplicación, pero está esperando la residencia. Planea votar por Kamala Harris y nació en Cuba. Otra persona es residente y ya está registrada para votar por su trabajo. Otra persona no es ciudadana y ya llenó la registración. Alguien dice que el primer día van a empezar a sacar gente. **English Translation:** A group is registering Hispanic voters in Phoenix. One woman is already registered through her job. Another person indicated they wanted to vote on an application but is waiting for residency. They plan to vote for Kamala Harris and were born in Cuba. Another person is a resident and is already registered to vote through their job. Another person is not a citizen and has already filled out the registration. Someone says that on the first day, they will start removing people.

On Monday, a large number of applications were submitted, many dated from June. These were delivered to the election bureau on the last day of registration, and one of the forms belonged to someone specific. There are various issues surrounding this situation.

A group of about 12 foreigners arrived to vote. Younger individuals assisted them in filling out their voter information. They managed to bypass a two-hour line and approached a polling official. However, there was an issue with one woman's name not being in the system. The group suggested they could change it on the spot, raising questions about how that could be done.

A group discusses voting issues as some individuals express frustration over being unable to vote. One person mentions needing to bring someone to vote by 4:00 PM, but another insists that voting is closed. They argue about the right to vote until 4:30 PM, with one person claiming that the line was cut off at 1:45 PM due to high volume. Accusations of voter fraud arise, with claims that the process is unfair. The conversation escalates as individuals demand accountability and express disbelief over the situation, insisting that everyone in line should be allowed to vote until the official closing time.

A person attempted to vote early, but the scanner was broken. Staff said they would scan the ballot later, after everyone left, and offered to put it in a box. The person declined and said they would return another day.

My friend tried to help her nephew get a driver's license in Pompano Beach, Florida, but they were turned away twice and told to return at 6 am. When they arrived early, they found a large group of Somali illegal immigrants, mostly military-age men, waiting. They were not allowed to film the scene. The speaker criticized the situation and mentioned the ease of obtaining a driver's license for voting purposes. They also blamed Kamala Harris for allowing these people into the country.

I woke up this morning determined to vote, feeling it was important to participate in the election. At the Episcopal Church in Cape Coral, Florida, I waited in line for about 30 minutes. When I presented my ID, the representative informed me that I had already voted by mail, which I denied. I expressed my concerns about mail-in voting being easily manipulated. The representative called someone for assistance, and after about 15 minutes, they were able to delete the erroneous vote. I was finally allowed to vote, but I felt anxious and confused, especially since I had just registered a week and a half ago. It’s unsettling to think that my vote could have been intercepted, and I’ll never know who I supposedly voted for by mail.

A woman is seen delivering a stack of unsigned ballots. A person in a car hands her a ballot to put in the ballot box. Realizing the ballots are unsigned, she signs each one individually in her car and places them on the dashboard. The video footage is clear and shows her going to the dropbox.

They go to the New York City Board of Elections office at 200 Varick Street, 10th Floor, in New York, NY, planning to pose as a non-citizen, Canadian green card holder to see how far they can get in the voter registration process. They note that a clerk initially says you must be a citizen to fill out the registration, but another clerk claims they “accept anything that comes over the counter” and that there are people who have legal situations and registered when they weren’t a citizen. The first clerk’s behavior raises concern: he does not tell them it would be illegal to complete the application as a noncitizen, only that he wouldn’t recommend it. The participants press for clarity. The first clerk admits that “we can’t stop you from submitting the application and if it goes through, but most likely because they don’t do like a full background check,” and adds that “once in a while, you know, we have people who come in here and they have legal situations and they registered, they weren’t a citizen, boom, boom, boom.” The participants quote that as a direct admission that non-citizens are in fact registering to vote. One participant asks if they can fill out the form, and the clerk responds: “Up to you. That’s right. I can’t tell you what to do. You wanna fill that, fill it out. But everything is clear clearly stated, especially at this bottom, it says American citizens.” The participant asks if the clerk would report them; the clerk says “No. No. No. I’m not, no. I’m not that’s not my job to report anyone. My job is just to collect the application and put it and submit it to the department.” The clerk adds that they “accept anything that comes over the counter, you know.” Under New York election law, section 17-106, it is stated that “any election officer who willfully violates any provision of the election law relative to the registration of electors is guilty of a felony.” The participants note it would be a criminal offense for the worker to process their voter registration after admitting to being a noncitizen. They ask if they can take materials with them and the clerk confirms they can “take one of these.” The participants are told that they can fill out the form, and if it comes back or doesn’t, they will submit it; the clerk reiterates that they “can’t do our background check on you. We just collect it.” On leaving, they decide not to submit any application, since doing so would be illegal. They later return to gather more information, but the worker becomes suspicious, consults a coworker, and then changes his stance and refuses to accept the application. They observe that at these centers, there is no requirement to show ID, Social Security, or any proof of identification; all you have to do is sign an affidavit stating you are an American citizen. They describe this as a potential threat to the integrity of the U.S. electoral system. They conclude with the implication that non-citizen registrations have occurred and question how many such forms have been processed.

The video documents an undercover-style investigation at the New York City Board of Elections on the 10th Floor at 200 Varick Street, focusing on whether noncitizens can register to vote. Speaker 0 plans to pose as a noncitizen Canadian green-card holder and attempts to engage a staffer about voter registration. In the first encounter, Speaker 2 tells Speaker 1 that “Everything you fill out, you’re swearing an affidavit that everything you’re putting down is true,” and notes that “you gotta be a citizen to fill it out.” Speaker 1 identifies as “a green card holder from Canada.” The staffer initially signals uncertainty about whether to fill out the form, saying, “I wouldn’t fill it out,” but also suggests the possibility that noncitizens have previously registered. Speaker 0 observes that the staffer does not state it would be illegal to complete the application as a noncitizen, only that the staffer “doesn’t recommend it.” The conversation reveals that the staffer acknowledges noncitizens have registered before: “We have people who come in here and they have legal situations and they registered, they weren’t a citizen, boom boom boom.” The staffer also admits that they “can’t stop you from submitting the application,” and that there is generally no full background check; “we can’t do our background check on you. We just collect it. That’s it.” Speaker 2 reinforces that the staff’s role is to collect and submit, not to verify citizenship, stating, “we accept anything that comes over the counter,” and reiterating that “if it comes back to you, it comes back to… If it doesn’t, it doesn’t.” When Speaker 1 asks if they will report the noncitizen, the staffer responds, “No. No. No. I’m not… that’s not my job to report anyone. My job is just to collect the application and put it and submit it to the department.” Speaker 0 cites New York election law—“Under New York election law, section seventeen one zero six, any election officer who willfully violates any provision of the election law relative to the registration of electors is guilty of a felony”—to argue that processing a noncitizen registration would be a criminal offense. After leaving the office, the pair return to request more information, but the staffer becomes suspicious, consults a coworker, and then refuses to accept their application. The video notes that, according to the staff, “we get registrations come to the mail. We, you know, we whatever comes through, we accept and then it’s submitted,” and emphasizes the absence of ID or proof of citizenship requirements at registration, solely requiring an affidavit asserting citizenship. The segment concludes by highlighting concerns about potential threats to electoral integrity, asserting that there is no requirement to show ID or documentation to register, and that all that is required is signing an affidavit claiming American citizenship.

I'm going to do some sparring and check online. A question arises about bringing someone to vote at 4 o'clock. Voting is reportedly closed, but there's confusion because people believe they have the right to vote until 4:30. One person explains that the process is slow due to high volume, leading to a cutoff at 1:45. This prompts accusations of voter fraud, claiming that cutting the line is unjust. Despite the explanation that the cutoff is posted, the frustration continues, with claims that everyone in line should be allowed to vote until 4:30 on election day. Tensions rise as accusations of election fraud are exchanged, and the situation remains heated.

The process is slow and grueling, leading to the decision to close the line at 1:45 PM due to high demand. Many people were still waiting, but they had to stop accepting new voters at that time. This has sparked claims of voter fraud, although others dispute that notion. There are suggestions to contact voter protection services and county commissioners to voice complaints about the situation. The discussion revolves around the frustrations of voters and the implications of the line closure.

My wife and I went to vote in Morgan County, where we recently moved. We updated our voter registration, but when we arrived at the precinct, our names weren't in the system. Poll watchers and clerks mentioned they were experiencing more voting issues than ever, affecting both new and long-time residents. We were allowed to vote provisionally, but our names won't be counted in the tally for about a week. This raises concerns about the voting process, especially in a small, predominantly red county in Alabama. What does this mean for voting issues across the country? Let's discuss.

The speaker mentions a strange occurrence where a person named Michael appeared in the voter records, even when the speaker entered their Social Security number. They express confusion and ask for help to understand who made the mistake. Even after re-entering the Social Security number and address, the person in question is still not identified as a woman. The speaker concludes that Michael is likely the driver.

A group of about 12 foreigners arrived to vote. They were assisted by younger individuals to fill out their voter registration forms. Despite facing a two-hour wait, they managed to bypass the line. When one woman approached the voting station, officials couldn't find her name in the system. The group suggested they could change her name to resolve the issue, raising questions about how that could be done.

I went to vote and found out someone with my exact name and birthday in the same state has already voted. When they scanned my license, it showed I had voted, but I haven't. My name is unique, and the only difference was the address. This seems strange, especially since I'm not registered to vote, which might explain the issue. Overall, it feels sketchy.

My wife and I went to vote in Morgan County after updating our voter registration. Upon arrival, we found our names missing from the system. Poll workers mentioned they were experiencing significant issues with both new and long-time voters. We were allowed to vote provisionally, but our votes won't be counted for several days. This raises concerns about how this might affect the overall voting process. If this is happening in a small, predominantly red county in Alabama, what issues might be occurring nationwide? Let's discuss.

The speaker noticed irregularities with the ballot numbers and names on absentee and mailing ballots. The numbers were almost consecutive, and some envelopes lacked a date. When the speaker questioned this, they were met with resistance. The ballot numbers were all from the same area, with similar signatures and no date stamp. None of these details were entered into the system, and they were being manually entered. The speaker suspected something was amiss but didn't challenge further to avoid being kicked out.

Key points from the testimonies: - There is a contention that ballots were run through the counting process multiple times, possibly thousands, with Speaker 0 noting statements that ballots could have been counted up to 30,000 times. When examining the poll book and comparing it to the votes cast, it is asked whether the numbers would align with the total votes from Detroit. - Speaker 2 asserts that the poll book is "completely off," with Speaker 3 estimating an error of over 100,000 in the poll book. A Downriver resident explains arriving at 3:40 a.m. due to 38,000 ballots that were “ride here” and “sitting over there and getting counted,” framing this as an eye-opening revelation about hypocrisy. - Security measures are described as unusual: Speaker 3 notes that windows are being taped up so challengers cannot see in, or out, raising questions about transparency. - Speaker 4 describes observing that none of the names on ballots were being scanned from the ballots into electronic poll books; instead, names appeared only on supplemental sheets. They note electronic poll books were updated on Sunday, November 1, implying that thousands of new ballots would have had to be registered on November 2 or 3. The speaker began writing down names after ballots were scanned but was obstructed by five individuals, including a poll worker, a supervisor, an uncredentialed person, a Democrat challenger, and a top ABCB leader, according to their affidavit. The speaker questions whether 30,000 to 40,000 new voters could have been legally signed up in two days. - Speaker 5 reports ballots that do not belong to anybody and do not appear in voter registration. They describe ballots with no names attached and note attempts to reevaluate them by placing them in a box. Multiple ballots show several different numbers. - Speaker 6 explains that, on the tables, ballots are accompanied by a computer screen showing which ballot it is. Sometimes a ballot has no name, but the registration file shows a person born in 1921 registered long before that year (1900), suggesting anomalies. The speaker asks what is wrong with being born in 1921, while Speaker 5 emphasizes a registration dating to 1900. - Speaker 7 lists egregious items: not allowed to perform duties, GOP challengers obstructed, procedures not followed, backdating ballots from November 4 to November 2, and data entered into computers for mail-in ballots with dates of birth like 01/01/1900, absent from electronic poll books or paper supplement books prior to that. They claim dead people were voting and reference a list of 17,327 Michigan voters over 80 who voted in 2020 and were found in obituaries online. This speaker calls the election described as the most important in their lifetime and in the republic’s history. - Representative Johnson is also mentioned, with a prompt to question the turnout rate, hinting at a purported turnout of 120%. Overall, the testimonies allege discrepancies between poll books and ballots, improper registration, backdated or misdated ballots, ballots lacking identifying information, obstructions to challengers, and possible participation of non-existent or deceased voters, culminating in claims of a highly irregular election process.

I went to vote, but they wouldn't let me. They claimed they didn't understand me because I was speaking English. Then they asked for ID, which I found outrageous. I couldn't believe they would ask for identification. They even said they were going to call the police on me.

A crowd gathered at the Saint Paul Armory after the governor signed a measure making driver's licenses available broadly, described as “driver’s licenses for all,” effectively serving as a photo ID for all residents, regardless of citizenship. The discussion then centers on how these licenses interact with voting and registration processes. One speaker notes that if someone comes in with a driver’s license, they would receive a photo ID and register accordingly, even if their social security number is incorrect or missing. The concern raised is whether that person, after obtaining a driver’s license, could then cast a vote despite incomplete registration information. The dialogue explores the potential for a non-citizen who possesses a driver’s license to participate in elections. In response, another participant—referred to as the chair—addresses the procedure for handling incomplete registrations. The chair explains that the designation on the roster for someone whose registration is incomplete can be resolved if the person presents an acceptable identification document. In such a case, the challenge from the roster would be cleared, and the individual would be permitted to cast a ballot. A subsequent aside acknowledges the potential problem inherent in this approach, with a speaker named Anderson prompting clarification. The core question remains: could a person who is not a citizen, but who presents a driver’s license at the voting point, be permitted to vote? The chair provides a definitive statement regarding eligibility: at both the time of registration and at the time of submitting a ballot, every voter signs an attestation affirming their eligibility to vote, including that they meet all eligibility requirements that they are a US citizen. This underscores the requirement that, despite the availability of driver’s licenses to a broad population, the attestation of citizenship remains a binding condition for voting. The exchange highlights a tension between broad ID access and the constitutional requirement of citizenship for voting, with the chair reiterating that citizenship is required to vote, even if driver’s licenses are issued more inclusively.

We work for a company registering Hispanic voters. Visited a Georgia complex, found 14% noncitizens registered to vote. Georgia has 339,000 noncitizens, potentially 47,000 registered. Biden won by 12,000 votes. 2024 election at risk.

A group of about 12 foreigners arrived to vote. They were assisted by younger individuals to fill out their voter registration. Despite a two-hour wait, they managed to bypass the line. One woman faced issues with her name not being in the system, but was told they could change it. There was confusion about how to change her name on the spot.