reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Bill Gates is accused of not being a true philanthropist as he allegedly uses his wealth to gain control over seed banks worldwide. By giving small amounts of money, he gains control over the CJR system and other seed banks. He then promotes technologies for patenting, further solidifying his control over the world's seeds. Gates also coined the term "net zero" to address climate issues, but critics argue that it doesn't mean reducing emissions or stopping pollution. Instead, it implies finding other people's land to compensate for environmental damage.

Bill Gates and his foundation are advocating for a specific type of agriculture that excludes animal-based proteins and small farms. This is leading to the consolidation of farms into large corporate mega farms, displacing small and medium-sized farms. Similar trends are happening in China, where small family farms are being replaced by government-controlled mega farms. The global agenda to target farmers is part of a larger plan to implement the same policies worldwide. This consolidation of agriculture and food supply is concerning because it can lead to food shortages and higher prices. The ultimate goal seems to be control over the food supply, as controlling food means controlling the people.

The speaker discusses the connection between financial control and the food supply, highlighting a push for synthetic lab-grown food controlled by the pharmaceutical industry. They warn against the potential consequences of losing control over transactions, which could lead to mandated consumption of artificial food products. The speaker emphasizes the importance of supporting farmers and fishermen to prevent the mass production of lab-grown meat in manufacturing plants and laboratories.

Bill Gates is the largest owner of ranches and farmland, raising questions about the trend of big companies buying up farmland. This is seen as a form of fascism, now being promoted as Build Back Better or The Great Reset.

Speaker 0 discusses Bill Gates’ alleged involvement with Tyrana Biosciences, stating that Gates has donated $50,000,000 to a new company called Tyrana Biosciences, and that they are going to create a new category of biologically modified crops. One of Tyrana’s first targets is soybeans, according to the speaker. The speaker claims that the product will not be detectable as modified, nor labeled as GMO, because the EPA has said that it is, quote, “naturally occurring compounds and is not GMO.” The speaker explains the mechanism: it is taking RNA from a virus and using it to insert whatever gene they want into whatever crop they want. Once the RNA is inside the plant, it replicates, and it gives it different features. The company allegedly brags that they can create whatever feature they want. One of their targets is to make it more insect resistant, so the speaker says you’re going to put insecticides within the food. The speaker states that Tyrana is targeting tomatoes, corn, and soybeans first. The claim is that it will not be labeled as modified or GMO. The speaker asserts that Bill Gates is betting on making profit by genetically modifying our food without telling us. The speaker claims that the EPA has already given it the green light.

Bill Gates is accused of not being a true philanthropist, as he allegedly takes control of seed banks worldwide by giving small amounts of money. He also promotes technologies for patenting, further solidifying his control over seeds. Gates has coined the term "net zero" to address climate issues, but critics argue that it doesn't mean reducing emissions or pollution. Instead, he suggests finding other people's lands as offsets for carbon emissions. The speaker claims that Gates has acquired land in America and now seeks more for carbon offset purposes. This is the concept of "net zero" being pushed in climate discussions.

Speaker 0 asserts that Bill Gates is not a philanthropist because he “gives a little bit of money to take over entire sectors.” They say Gates works on seed, with the big seed banks described as the “CJR system.” The claim is that “he gives a million here, but he takes all the seeds of that system, the ICRISAT system.” They assert that all of the world’s seed banks are now controlled by Gates through this method. The summary continues: Gates “finances the Swalbat seed bank,” then “he creates patent systems.” He is said to develop and promote technologies for patenting, including gene editing technologies and digital sequence technologies, thereby controlling the seeds of the world. They claim Gates “destroys the international system that controls the country’s rights to their seed,” naming the Convention on Biological Diversity and the FAO treaty on seed. They say he “destroys and undercuts them so that all the seeds of the world are his seeds,” and that he can be the Newman Santo on a global scale. Later, it is asserted that Gates is “the biggest farmland owner of America.” The speaker contends Gates coined a term, “net zero,” and that Gates says climate problems can be solved by net zero. They insist it doesn’t mean emission reductions; rather, “we will con” [likely "we will con" is a fragment] and that we will absorb pollution via “offsets” on other people’s lands. The claim is that Gates “flies a private jet and has all the private jet services of the world.” They say he bought “all the land in America,” but he “wants our land for carbon offsets.” The overall assertion is that this is the climate strategy described as net zero, and that it constitutes a “land grabber” approach through carbon offsets.

Farmers have been saving and planting seeds for thousands of years, but the idea of corporations owning food crops is relatively new. In the 1980s, the Supreme Court allowed the patenting of life, leading to companies like Monsanto patenting valuable crops. Monsanto, a chemical company known for products like DDT and Agent Orange, developed Roundup and genetically engineered soybeans that could resist it. Farmers initially resisted the idea of not being able to save their own seeds, but over time, acceptance grew. Now, if a farmer saves seeds, Monsanto, the main company involved, may send investigators to look into the matter.

The Dutch farmer protests are not anti-environmental, but a response to oppressive agricultural practices by companies like Monsanto and Bill Gates. Farmers use fertilizers due to financial pressure, not by choice. The Great Reset exploits green agendas to bankrupt farmers and seize their land. Support for farmers should come from the community, not globalist bodies, to make sustainable transitions together.

Checklist for summary approach: - Identify and preserve the core claims about GMO technology, safety concerns, and corporate motives as presented. - Highlight explicit examples and mechanisms (insertion of genes, Bt toxin, built-in pesticides, herbicide tolerance, seed patents). - Note the portrayed regulatory and legal dynamics (lobbying, revolving door, labeling, litigation, seed saving restrictions). - Emphasize unique or provocative elements (codfish gene for frost resistance, Indian BT cotton suicides link, cross-pollination as “not our problem”). - Exclude repetitive or filler content; avoid adding new judgments or opinions. - Translate or retain English phrasing of key statements exactly as needed. - Keep the summary within 388–486 words. Genetically modified organisms (GMO) are presented as a comprehensive, almost omnipotent solution to modern nutrition and farming, combining inserted insect and fish genes, irradiation, and pesticides embedded in crops. The narrative asserts: “Our GM scientists are putting the pesticide right inside the crops,” so the food itself will “kill those pesky critters stone cold dead.” It claims Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxin, produced by the inserted gene, destroys insects’ stomachs but not humans, adding, “We have absolutely no testing results to prove that these are safe, but they are. Trust us.” It argues that pesticides in crops enable plants to withstand more weed killer than organic crops, promising “No weeds, no bugs. More food, more profit.” The transcript lists staple crops: corn, rice, soybeans, cotton, alfalfa, papaya, oilseed rape, and adds that “GM is the gift that keeps on giving,” with ambitions including frost-resistant traits such as codfish genes in strawberries for the icy North Atlantic environment: “insert a gene from a codfish… Result, frost resistant strawberries.” It frames the looming challenge of population growth and food security as justification for rapid GMO adoption. Testing anecdotes are cited: “tests on rats eating genetically modified potatoes showed them growing slower after two or three generations and developing fertility problems, some organ development issues.” The speakers disparage critics as “goody two shoes scientists” and “whiny campaigners,” insisting they will wait to see human effects while biotech profits fund further GMO experiments. A central strategy is to persuade farmers to abandon organic farming in favor of GM, accompanied by aggressive seed patenting: “Whenever we change the natural gene sequence of any plant, we get a patent ASAP. It’s our invention after all. … total control of the seed.” Seed saving would be prohibited: “If you save seeds for next year’s crop, we’ll know. We’ll tie up farmers for years in the courts.” Farmers must buy new seeds and pesticides yearly; cross-pollination is dismissed as not their problem, and “your crops belong to us” once genes migrate. Regulatory capture and lobbying are described as routine: a “revolving door” between industry and judges, former GM lawyers in regulation bodies, and efforts to keep GMO labeling off products. The piece notes India’s BT cotton saga, claiming “hundreds of thousands of farmers have been organically recycled to dodge debts that they owe us,” with debts supposedly dying with farmers under Indian law and Bt cotton’s yields and bollworm resistance threatening revenue, as the strategy envisions becoming the sole cotton-seed supplier. European concerns about GMO pig feet—sterilization and growth issues—are acknowledged, with plans to work around them. The closing pitch invites consumption: “Eat up your veggies… there’ll be plenty for everyone for the right price.”

Seed companies pressure farmers to buy their seeds by threatening lawsuits if farmers use their own seeds. Farmers must pay fees to plant genetically modified seeds and risk being audited if they don't repurchase. This system leaves farmers without ownership of their crops, as companies can claim rights to any genetic traces found. For example, buying seeds for 300 acres of soybeans cost over $30,000.

This video explores the involvement of powerful entities like the Rockefellers and Rothschilds in the farming and food industry. It discusses the current paradigm of industrial farming, which involves the heavy use of toxic pesticides and the mistreatment of animals in factory farms. The concentration of power in the hands of a few mega producers is highlighted, along with the negative effects on the environment and human health. The video also delves into the debate surrounding genetically engineered foods (GMOs) and the influence of biotech and big ag companies on government regulators. It mentions concerns about the safety of GMOs, conflicts of interest in research, and the use of food as a weapon during times of war. The importance of local and decentralized food systems is emphasized as a solution to break free from the control of these powerful entities.

The speaker explains that they never switched to Monsanto Soybeans because they were getting good yields with conventional soybeans. They mention that their neighbors all use GMO soybeans, which can affect their crops. Another speaker points out that when a crop is genetically modified, the company owns it, which is a new concept in agriculture. They compare Monsanto to Microsoft, saying that Monsanto aims to own the intellectual property behind most of the food in America. Public plant breeding is now rare, and there are only a few varieties of soybeans available. The speaker expresses concern about not being able to buy certified seed and mentions a blacklist of unauthorized growers. They are on the list because they refused to turn over their records. The speaker concludes by discussing the limitations they face in choosing what to plant.

Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab predict a future where people own nothing and are happy. They plan to reset all systems, including food and education. Gates is buying up farmland and investing in fake meat while food processing facilities are mysteriously burning down. This raises concerns about the destruction of the food supply. Strange events are unfolding, and they claim responsibility.

In 2020, a powerful organization known as stakeholders initiated a 10-year shift towards stakeholder capitalism, marking the decline of shareholder capitalism. Their agenda includes controlling the food supply chain by 2030, with Bill Gates becoming the largest individual farmland owner. They promote GMO foods and aim to ban livestock, suggesting alternatives like artificial meat and insects as food sources. Climate change is used as a justification for these changes, with warnings about food insecurity and famine. Protests by farmers are escalating globally, with thousands demonstrating against government policies that threaten family farms. The situation raises concerns about food security and the future of agriculture. For more information, visit yellow.forum.

Trevor Coppola and Deborah Tavares discuss a NASA “war document” that they say was publicly accessible on the NASA website. They highlight that the PowerPoint, presented in July 2001 by Dennis Bushnell, chief NASA scientist at the Langley Center, is titled Future Warfare Circa 2025 and asserts “based in all cases upon existing data trends analysis technologies, no pixie dust.” They contend the document’s premise centers on robots, cyborgs, and humans, and note a startling contrast between its stated near-term reality and its actual content. Key claims and findings they emphasize include: - The document’s page 93 allegedly states: “capture, torture Americans in living color on prime time,” followed by plans for terror attacks within the Continental United States using binary biologicals to take down critical infrastructure, an EMP, and the use of radiation frequencies against brains, along with serious psy war and collateral damage, and exploitation. It also mentions “exploit CNN syndrome.” - The document allegedly involves agencies including the US Air Force, DARPA, CIA, FBI, Southern Command, Atlantic Command, Australian Department of Defense, and other corporate/government entities; the speakers claim the US has become a corporation (USA Inc.) and that the constitution has been bypassed. - It is claimed that the document references the use of frequencies and beam weapons, micro-dust as a weapon (micron-sized mechanized dust distributed as an aerosol that bores into lungs), and the manipulation of public perception via mass media propaganda (the “CNN syndrome” appears in the text). - Page 66 is cited as saying humans are “too large,” “too heavy,” “too tender,” and “too slow,” requiring huge logistical trains and implying humans have a rapidly decreasing value. - The document allegedly notes that routine smart meters and frequency-based warfare will affect 100% of the human population, with some as “canaries in the coal mine” experiencing health effects such as ringing in the ears, heart palpitations, skin rashes, and sleep disruption; frequencies are said to jam the immune system. - It is claimed that elites shield themselves from such weapons using advanced technologies, including cancer cures, chip mechanisms, and transhumanist pursuits; they discuss chemtrails and nanofibers as phase one of a multi-layered program. - The speakers connect the NASA document to a broader framework including the Iron Mountain and Silent Weapons Quiet Wars documents, arguing these outline a plan to depopulate, mind-control, and subjugate populations through electronic, environmental, and societal manipulation. They mention that the document foresees educational and social control via computers, telecommuting, and a rewritten history/education system. - They discuss the oiling of global governance by elites (Bilderberg, Trilateral Commission, Skull and Bones), and claim individuals like John P. Holdren, MITRE, Leon Panetta, and others operate without a constitution to move policies toward this plan. - They argue that climate-change rhetoric and geoengineering (chemtrails) serve as cover for population reduction and control, including deforestation, food supply manipulation, and a global shift toward corporate dominance (Monsanto, seed control, and bio-terror strategies). On solutions, they advocate rapid public education through source documents: Silent Weapons Quiet Wars, Iron Mountain, and New World Order Exposed 1969, all available via stopthecrime.net. They urge a revelation rather than a revolution to avoid martial law and to counter weaponized frequencies, smart meters, and surveillance mechanisms. They advise looking at the NASA document to form a new reality based on these truths, enabling informed action. They conclude by directing listeners to stopthecrime.net and smartmetersmurder.com for access to related materials and videos, including Barry Trower’s work on frequency weaponization and the deployment of disguised cell towers.

The transcript presents a claim that seed companies pressure farmers to buy their seeds, contributing to higher food costs. It asserts that farmers can be sued if they plant their own seeds, and that farmers do not own the genetics of their crops unless they use heirloom seeds. To plant these seeds, farmers must pay a fee, and seed companies can come onto a farmer’s property to inspect plants; if any part contains the company’s genetics, the farmer can be sued. The speaker emphasizes that farmers do not own the hard work of growing the plant because of these seed-ownership practices. Seed companies are described as reminding farmers of their purchasing history by saying, “we know you bought our seed last year,” and that if farmers do not buy seeds again, the companies will audit them. The speaker then shares a personal example: an order of three totes, sufficient to plant 300 acres of soybeans and to have the right to plant them, cost over $30,000.

A speaker discusses genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and the debate surrounding their safety, mentioning a petition signed by 17 Nobel laureates asserting their safety. The speaker says that while millions have consumed GMOs without apparent harm, the context is important. The speaker explains that GMOs are often engineered to resist glyphosate, and glyphosate is used heavily. Glyphosate is described as an antibiotic, patented for antibiotic use, that kills microbiota around plants. The speaker claims that glyphosate is the most prescribed antibiotic on Earth, especially in rice farming, and that the consequences of its widespread use are unknown.

Speaker discusses Bill Gates and his acquisitions in U.S. farmland, stating he owns about 242,000 acres of farmland in The United States, which is described as a lot. The claim is made that during COVID, China bought up about the same amount of farmland in The United States, and the purpose attributed to these acquisitions is to control the food supply. The speaker notes Gates as also one of the biggest investors in fake meat products that are entering storefronts, and mentions the existence of fake meat commodities being introduced into supermarkets. The speaker asserts that this is a distraction. They further claim to examine fake protein and how it’s being inserted in most products, stating that the aim is to take animal protein out of the consumption model and turn it into something grown and produced in the labs.

The speakers argue that a coordinated, engineered strategy is unfolding to destroy global energy and food systems, with catastrophic humanitarian consequences. They claim the plan involves triggering and exploiting energy infrastructure attacks, fostering mass migrations, and provoking global famines to reshape geopolitics. Key assertions and timelines: - A broader war design is being executed to destabilize the Middle East and other core energy regions. The speakers contend the Middle East is being “disassembled” and that global famines and depopulation are deliberate outcomes of this strategy. - They link energy disruptions to food insecurity, fertilizer shortages (urea, sulfuric acid), and fertilizer-related price shocks, arguing that a closed Strait of Hormuz and attacks on LNG facilities will cascade into global shortages and mass hunger. - Specific choke points emphasized as leverage points include the Strait of Hormuz, Strait of Malacca, Bosphorus (Turkish Strait), Suez, Bab al-Mandeb, Panama Canal, Danish Strait, and the Strait of Gibraltar. Closing any of these routes, they say, could trigger widespread disruptions in Europe, Asia, and beyond. Recent developments they highlight: - Israel reportedly struck Iran’s gas fields, with Iran retaliating by striking Qatar Energy facilities. Two of Qatar Energy’s 14 cryogenic LNG trains have been destroyed, with a repair time of three to five years for those two trains, per a Reuters interview with the Qatar Energy CEO. This means 17% of Qatar Energy’s annual production is offline, with potential to reach higher percentages if more trains or related infrastructure are attacked. - Force majeure has been declared by Qatar Energy for several major buyers (Italy, Belgium, South Korea, China, Taiwan, Japan) due to the reduced capacity to meet long-term contractual obligations. - The destruction of LNG trains could, if extended to all 14, create a ten-year or longer global famine with estimates ranging from two to four billion deaths over the next decade, according to AI-assisted projections cited by the speakers. - They suggest that continued escalation could devastate LNG supply chains, resulting in widespread economic collapse, rolling blackouts, and mass social upheaval, including potential collapses of allied states and severe shifts in global power dynamics. - They argue the petrodollar system is under pressure as Iran asserts control of Strait of Hormuz through its actions, threatening the flow of energy priced in dollars. Broader geopolitical implications: - The speakers contend that the US is losing influence in the Middle East and that Gulf states may rethink alliances if the US cannot guarantee energy security. They forecast Taiwan and Japan, among others, could be deeply endangered due to supply-chain and energy pressures, with Taiwan potentially facing a forced realignment with China as a result of famine-induced coercion. - They predict other regional disruptions (e.g., to Thai and Indian food security) and warn that food production is increasingly vulnerable to energy constraints and to strategic moves by powerful actors who want to alter the global order. - They connect these energy and food dynamics to a larger narrative about AI-driven economic restructuring and population replacement, arguing that governments may seek to depopulate or reengineer labor markets to accommodate AI, while relying on the digital grid to control populations in the aftermath of shortages. Cast of participants and perspectives: - The main speaker (Speaker 0) asserts that these outcomes are deliberate and predictable, citing repeated warnings over years about energy and food-security chokepoints. He argues that the predicted escalations are aligned with a longer-term plan to depopulate and to redraw global influence. - Speaker 1 and Michael Yon (a war correspondent) participate in reinforcing the predicted trajectory, discussing the strategic significance of LNG energy infrastructure, the potential for further train (equipment) destruction, and the cascading consequences for global hunger and economic stability. - The dialogue emphasizes urgency, with repeated warnings that escalation must be de-escalated to avert a decade-long famine and systemic collapse. In sum, the speakers present a cohesive, alarmist view: a deliberate campaign targeting energy infrastructure and global supply routes is underway, with two LNG trains destroyed at Qatar Energy and the Strait of Hormuz potentially kept closed by design. If unchecked, they warn of a decade-long, billions-deaths-scale famine, seismic shifts in global power, and a transformed energy order, accompanied by social and political upheaval across many nations.

Bill Gates is accused of not being a true philanthropist as he allegedly takes control of seed banks by giving small amounts of money. He then promotes technologies for patenting, effectively controlling the world's seeds. Gates also created the term "net zero" to address climate issues, but it doesn't mean eliminating emissions. He continues to fly in private jets and suggests finding other people's lands to solve pollution problems.

Bill Gates and his foundation are acquiring farmland and promoting a specific type of agriculture that excludes animal-based proteins. Small and medium-sized farms are being replaced by corporate mega farms due to excessive regulations. This trend is not limited to Holland, but is happening globally as part of a larger agenda pushed by governments. The globalist agenda aims to control national governments and parliaments. The focus should be on the top 20 countries responsible for 80% of emissions, and money is seen as the solution. However, these policies are leading to higher food prices and potential food shortages, which will impact not only farmers but also the food supply and national security. The ultimate goal seems to be the consolidation of agriculture and control over the food supply.

Four companies today control the seed system. They do not want farmers to have their own seeds. They treat farmers having their own seeds as violating their monopoly rights. The monopoly rights are created through patenting and intellectual property. Intellectual property rights means I have created something. I'm an inventor. But seed is not a machine. It is not put together. Seed is evolution forever. Seed is renewable. Seed is multiplicative. One seed can give me a thousand seeds. In the case of millets, a 100,000 seeds. When seeds are made nonrenewable and seeds are designed for use of chemicals, what happens is biodiversity starts to disappear.

Bill Gates has taken over control of WHO, and it's become his vessel for, you know, what he calls philanthrocapitalism. This approach leverages the WHO’s influence to mandate vaccines for children in African countries, vaccines made almost invariably by companies in which Gates has a private financial interest or which his foundation has a private financial interest. It was the same thing with the Green Revolution in Africa, where African countries were switched from traditional agriculture to GMO monocultures. Gates brought in corporations—Coca Cola to buy the corn syrup, Kraft, McDonald's, Monsanto, Cargill—to build the infrastructure for HMO products, to build the supply chain, and then create those products and sell them to US corporations. It’s been a calamity for the people of Africa, with 30,000,000 additional people who have become food insecure as a direct result of Gates' Green Revolution. Gates and his companies have made a killing on it.