TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

He claims to have a superior plan, but he hasn't shared it yet. Despite Canada experiencing wildfires, he continues to deny the existence of climate change.

Why did you and your husband participate in a large Visa IPO in March 2008, especially with legislation affecting credit card companies at that time? Did you consider it a conflict of interest? I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make with your question. Are you suggesting it's acceptable for a speaker to accept a favorable stock deal? You participated in the IPO while being Speaker of the House. Do you believe that wasn’t a conflict of interest or at least appeared to be one? It only appears that way if you base it on a false premise, which isn’t true. I’m unclear on which part you find untrue. Can you clarify? Yes, I can act upon an investment.

The speaker claims to help the environment while creating jobs, enabling them to stand up to the Americans from a position of strength. In response to criticisms about oil and gas subsidies and the industrial carbon tax, the speaker states that capital cost allowances are standard across corporate garments of industry. They claim to have answered this question previously, suggesting the questioner doesn't understand the tax code. The speaker also states that the biggest component of that was the cost of building.

According to Speaker 0, Canada's new prime minister threatened to seize capital from companies not advancing Canada's climate agenda. Speaker 1 stated the goal is for every financial decision to consider climate change, backing companies that are part of the solution and taking capital away from those who are part of the problem. Speaker 0 claims the prime minister is a fan of censorship and threatened American social media platforms, referencing a statement by Speaker 1 that large American online platforms have become seas of hate and are being used by criminals to harm children, and that his government will act. Speaker 0 asserts there is no free speech in Canada and that the prime minister wants to ban social media platforms, shut down dissent, and use the climate crisis as an excuse to steal from businesses and control their means of production. Speaker 0 concludes that while the friendship between the US and Canada will continue, the "free ride" is over.

You claim to be running against the Ottawa establishment, yet you've been part of it for a decade. Why should anyone believe you're not part of the establishment? People can see the dynamics of the race. I resigned because I recognized the need to focus on the threat posed by Donald Trump. Wouldn't you have had a better chance to help Canada by staying in cabinet? No, Canada is strong and will impress the world with our resilience. I take pride in rallying Canadians and advocating for our country every day.

Speaker 0 accuses Mr. Trudeau of selling out Canada to globalism and working for his globalist partners instead of the country. The speaker questions how much Mr. Trudeau is being paid to betray Canada and suggests that traitors used to be hanged for treason. The speaker mentions that they know what Mr. Trudeau is doing and brings up the topic of oil.

The speaker recalls a past policy from when they were deputy leader of another party, stating that they would denounce the World Economic Forum, and asserts that there can be no good arising from the richest people in the world meeting the most powerful people in the world behind closed doors, without an agenda, without minutes, and without public scrutiny. They emphasize that such a gathering lacks transparency and accountability. The speaker then shifts to a critique of a specific political figure, Mandelson, claiming that what has been seen with Mandelson is “the tip of the iceberg.” They argue that the reason Mandelson isn’t already in jail, and the reason he twice came back from political obscurity, was put back into office, ennobled, and made an ambassador, is because “the establishment is rotten to the core,” and that “the world’s gonna be a problem.” Further, the speaker claims that someone takes money from a billionaire who is foreign-born in order to attend the World Economic Forum so he can speak on a program with Bloomberg, and states that such a person is “someone we should not be electing as prime minister of this country.” The speech then transitions to prompting or signaling that there is a question to be addressed next, as indicated by the final remark, “We now have a question.”

You accused me of betraying Canada for globalism, but Canada benefits from immigration. Claims of giving up sovereignty are meant to create fear. Canadians should be critical of online information and political rhetoric.

I'm asking when the thousands of fossil fuel industry workers, who are now out of work because of a Biden EO, can expect to get their promised green jobs. I welcome you to present data showing these people won't get green jobs. Richard Trumka wished the President had paired the Keystone EO with a plan for creating new jobs. The Laborers International Union of North America says the Keystone decision will cost thousands of existing and projected jobs. The President plans to share details of a plan to create millions of good union jobs and tackle the climate crisis in the weeks ahead. Many believe investment in infrastructure will boost the US economy, create good-paying union jobs, and advance our climate and clean energy goals.

The speaker claims the prime minister is a climate zealot and eco extremist. They assert the prime minister has pushed for net-zero banking for decades, intending to prevent banks from investing in oil and gas. The speaker alleges the prime minister plans to increase carbon taxes on the oil and gas industry to eviscerate it, referencing the prime minister's book as evidence. According to the speaker, Canada's national identity, unity, freedom, and future are at a monumental crossroads.

On his first day, President Trump signed an executive order recognizing only two genders: male and female. If elected as prime minister, would you align with this view? I'm aware of only two genders. If there are others, feel free to share. Personally, I believe the government should stay out of people's personal decisions. Regarding gender-neutral passports, my focus is on pressing issues like homelessness, poverty, and rising crime in Canada. With 25% of our population in poverty and housing costs skyrocketing, I find it odd to prioritize gender labels on passports. My goal is to restore the promise of hard work leading to decent pay and affordable living for Canadians. Let others discuss labels; I will focus on what truly matters for our country.

The speaker questions why Greta Thunberg never criticizes Saudi Arabia or Russia, only Western energy. They ask if she will condemn OPEC energy and every delegate who arrived on a private jet. They challenge her to condemn private jets and ask if she has ever been on one. The speaker claims to own 100 private jets and asks if Greta has ever been on one, to which she responds affirmatively.

I'm asking when the Biden administration will provide green jobs for fossil fuel workers who are out of work due to a Biden EO. When can these people count on these jobs? I welcome you to present data showing thousands won't get green jobs. Richard Trumka noted the need to pair the Keystone EO with job creation plans. The Laborers International Union of North America estimates the Keystone decision will cost thousands of jobs. The President plans a climate plan with transformative investments in infrastructure, creating millions of good union jobs and addressing the climate crisis. He intends to share more details in the weeks ahead. People need money now; when will those who lost jobs due to the Keystone pipeline get their green jobs? The President and many in Congress believe that investment in infrastructure creates good-paying union jobs, boosts the US economy, advances our climate and clean energy goals.

You've betrayed Canada for globalism. You're not serving our country but your globalist allies. I question how much you're being compensated for this betrayal. What should we do with traitors in Canada, Mr. Trudeau? Historically, they faced severe consequences for treason, and your actions feel similar to that betrayal.

I'm asking when the thousands of fossil fuel industry workers, who are now out of work due to the Biden EO, will get their promised green jobs. When can they count on this? Well, present your data showing that they won't get green jobs. Richard Trumka noted the need to pair the Keystone EO with job creation. The Laborers International Union of North America said the Keystone decision will cost union jobs. The President plans a climate plan with transformative investments and infrastructure, creating millions of good union jobs while tackling the climate crisis. He plans to put forward a jobs plan. People need money now. When do they get their green jobs? The President believes that investment in infrastructure creates good-paying union jobs, advances our climate and clean energy goals, and he plans to share more details in the weeks ahead.

Speaker 0: Hello Mr. Trudeau, Alexandre from Rebel News. I want to quickly address what happened yesterday. You demonized one of the few media outlets that doesn't receive government funding. You expressed your opinion that we spread misinformation. If that were true, the Supreme Court wouldn't have allowed us to be here today. Will you kindly answer my question as the Prime Minister, or will you continue to demonize my profession? I shared my perspective on your organization last night, and I have nothing more to say. It makes one wonder who you really are. Thank you.

Speaker 0 questions why Speaker 1 only protests Western energy and never criticizes Saudi Arabia or Russia. Speaker 1 denies ever doing so. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 will condemn OPEC Energy and their use of private jets, and if Speaker 1 has ever been on a private jet. Speaker 1 claims to own 100 private jets and admits to frequently using them. Speaker 0 expresses confusion over Speaker 1's evasive responses.

We are proud of our influence in government. A constituent asked about outside interference in democracy, specifically regarding Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum. He claimed that the WEF has infiltrated over half of Canada's cabinet. In the interest of transparency, could you name the cabinet ministers aligned with the WEF's agenda? Order, please. The question is important, but the audio and video quality are poor. I apologize for that. The younger generation, including Prime Minister Trudeau, is involved.

I am here to ask Justin Trudeau basic questions about the carbon tax. Seven premiers oppose the tax hike, including Danielle Smith. The police are behaving strangely, following me and not allowing me to approach the prime minister. We just want answers to questions that Canadians care about. This behavior is outrageous and unnecessary.

I'm committed to making America healthier than other countries. Will you guarantee the same healthcare coverage that other major countries provide? Corruption isn't just in federal agencies; it's in Congress too. Many members here, including you, accept millions from the pharmaceutical industry to protect their interests. I ran for president and received millions in contributions, but none came from pharmaceutical executives or PACs. My support comes from workers, not corporate interests. You were the largest recipient of pharmaceutical donations in 2020. No, I received support from workers across the country, not from corporations. You still haven't answered the last question.

You are accused of working for globalist partners and betraying Canada. In the past, traitors were hanged for treason, and it is claimed that you are doing the same to us now.

The speaker claims to help the environment while creating jobs, enabling economic independence and strength against the Americans. Regarding criticisms about oil and gas subsidies and the industrial carbon tax, the speaker states that capital cost allowances are standard across corporate garments of industry. They claim to have answered this question previously, suggesting critics don't understand the tax code. The speaker also acknowledges that the biggest component of cost was building.

My name is Anna from Colorado. I see the wildfires affecting us. I want to know how you plan to support working-class people. You seem sincere, but I need clarity on your stance. Can you commit to not accepting corporate money? I’m just trying to understand your position. I’m a working-class person myself. What’s your job? Are you representing working-class interests or corporate ones? I’m not trying to shut you down; I just want a straightforward answer. Are you with the working class or the corporations? Yes or no? Why do you refuse to answer?

The speaker alleges that Mark Carney and Justin Trudeau are setting up a system where companies must buy carbon credits from companies like Brookfield if they are not "eco and green." They claim Brookfield will profit immensely from this. The speaker points to SEC filings showing Carney has 209,000 shares of Brookfield at $35 and 200,000 shares at $40, potentially netting him $6.8 million if sold. They suggest Carney's promotion of net-zero policies could greatly increase Brookfield's stock value, further enriching him. The speaker demands transparency regarding Carney's investments, questioning if he owns additional shares of Brookfield. The speaker plays audio of Carney discussing a $100 billion a year market in carbon offsets and stating that financial institutions expect to "make a lot of money off of this" transition to net zero. The speaker concludes that Carney has significant conflicts of interest and should not be Prime Minister.

Canadians are feeling the impacts of the climate emergency with wildfires and extreme weather. The government spent $34 billion on the Trans Mountain pipeline instead of investing in real climate solutions. Big oil CEOs profit while Canadians struggle. We need a windfall tax on oil and gas profits, regulations to cap emissions, and investments in clean jobs and climate resilience. The current government delays climate action, while conservatives deny the crisis. We need to end fossil fuel subsidies and prioritize real climate solutions.