TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes with identical markings. They point out a little tail and the word "Republican" written on both. They mention that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they didn't go through all of them. The speaker doesn't remember the exact numbers, but they mention that the batches were fairly close. They highlight one image with a little bubble and mention that it matches another image with the same batch number. The conclusion is that there are duplicate ballots in the entire batch that were scanned multiple times.

Who determined the number 420,987,987 regarding failed signatures from the 2020 election? That figure comes from analyzing a quarter of the 1,900,000 mail-in ballots in Maricopa County. We had 150 trained workers review the envelopes based on the secretary of state's guidelines, examining each voter record individually. After analyzing 25% of the ballots, we extrapolated the data to arrive at the final number. It's important to note that this analysis only pertains to Maricopa County, which had over 2 million ballots in total, with around 1.9 million being mail-in votes. Yes, that is correct. Thank you. Proceed.

These are examples of approved and failed ballots. The Voter Privacy Act prohibits inspectors from examining ballots to verify signatures. Many of the reviewed ballots have two different patterns of the letter "S" in the signature, even though some owners' names don't contain an "S." In total, 104,820 ballots were reviewed, with 20,232 having mismatched signatures.

Fulton County, Georgia admits in a consent decree that 3,600 ballots were duplicated, with 36 batches involved. This raises concerns about potential wrongdoing. We eagerly await further information and facts to emerge. It marks the start of a significant period in the ongoing voter situation.

The speaker points out duplicate ballots in the video, showing examples where the word "Republican" is written the same way on different ballots. They have a total of 62 images showing similar instances. The batch numbers for the duplicate ballots are provided as well. It is clear that the same batch was scanned multiple times, resulting in duplicate ballots.

In Georgia, over 200,000 mail-in ballots were found to have been voted but never marked as returned. About 96,000 of these ballots were never marked as returned but were still voted. This issue was not limited to just a few counties, as it was seen across the board. Additionally, some ballots were shown as voted before they were even received back by the county, which is not supposed to happen. These irregularities raise concerns about the legality of these votes.

42,000 people in Nevada voted more than once, 1,500 were deceased, 19,000 didn't live in Nevada, 8,000 had non-existent addresses, 15,000 were registered at commercial or vacant addresses, and 4,000 were non-citizens. The speaker asked about voter fraud prosecutions in Nevada, to which the response was not yet.

I found that there were approximately 25,000 ballots in Maricopa County that were not printed from the official Dominion PDF ballot. These ballots had imperfections in the lines and circles, unlike the perfect PDF printing. The imperfections were consistent across all the ballots, suggesting they were not genuine. These 25,000 questionable ballots alone exceed Joe Biden's margin of victory by over double.

In my examination of the photographs, I found that there were approximately 5,000 different ballots produced by the election subcontractor for each zone or district in Maricopa County. These ballots were specific to the issues relevant to each area. However, I discovered that around 25,000 ballots were not printed from the official Dominion PDF ballot. These ballots had imperfections in the lines and breaks in the circles or ovals, which were consistent across all of them. These 25,000 unidentifiable ballots alone represent more than double the margin of Joe Biden's 10,457 vote lead.

There are concerns about duplicate ballots in the audit. The speaker mentions that there should be a lower count due to duplicates, but they are not seeing any reference to duplicates in the forms. Speaker 1 explains that duplicate ballots are created when the original ballot is damaged and cannot be processed. These duplicates should have a matching 6-digit serial number with the original damaged ballot, but they cannot find the matching originals. Speaker 2 confirms this, stating that they are finding duplicate ballots without corresponding serial numbers on the damaged originals. They are struggling to match the duplicated ballots with the missing originals.

There are two batches of votes being examined. The speaker points out that there are identical markings on different ballots, suggesting duplication. They show examples of the same markings and even a dot in the same spot. The speaker mentions having a total of 62 images, but didn't go through all of them. The numbers of the batches are not remembered, but it is clear that duplicate ballots were scanned multiple times.

We found around 25,000 ballots in Maricopa County that were not created from the usual PDF used for elections. The ballots are tailored to different neighborhoods and come in English and Spanish versions. These ballots are pre-made for mail-in voting and early voting locations. However, we discovered that the quality of these pre-made ballots was significantly lower than expected, indicating a potential issue with the printing process.

The number of 420,987 failed signatures in the 2020 election was determined by reviewing a quarter of the 1,900,000 envelopes in Maricopa County. Trained workers followed guidelines to analyze each voter record individually, leading to the extrapolation of the final number. This analysis focused solely on Maricopa County's ballots.

We found 74,243 mail-in ballots in Arizona with no record of being sent. In Arizona, EB32s track when ballots are sent, and EB33s track when they are received. There should be more EB32s than EB33s. These ballots were tied to specific individuals, but we lack proof they were sent to them.

Fulton County, Georgia admits in a consent decree that 3,600 ballots were duplicated, with 36 batches involved. This raises concerns about potential wrongdoing. We eagerly await further information on this matter, as it marks the start of a significant period. The scale of voter impact is substantial.

The investigation confirms that there are missing ballot images. Specifically, 380,761 ballot images from the election day machine count are not available. We subpoenaed Fulton County for all ballot images and received about 518,000, but these pertain to the recount, not the election day count. Thus, the missing images are a result of the focus on the recount rather than the original election day data.

Approximately 25,000 ballots were not created from the PDF used for the election process. The election provider creates specific ballots for different geographical areas. In Maricopa County, there were over 5,000 different permutations and combinations of the ballots, with a Spanish version available for each. These ballots are created in advance as some are sent out by third parties and for early voting. However, the quality of the ballots in this group is significantly worse than the PDFs that are printed on demand or by the regular provider.

We compared the voter rolls to identify people who had moved but still voted by mail. We excluded cases where someone with the same last name still lived at the address. This led us to find 23,344 individuals who voted from addresses they no longer resided at. Mail-in ballots cannot be forwarded, so the only legal way for this to happen is if the voter knows the current resident and arranges to pick up their ballot.

After the election, it was discovered that 18,000 individuals who had voted were subsequently removed from the voter rolls. These individuals were initially listed as eligible voters, but their names were later taken off the rolls.

Further analysis of the duplicates and the EVVs revealed an interesting trend. The graph shows the duplicates in relation to the daily percentage of EVVs. There was a sudden significant increase in the percentage of duplicates on certain days, with 96% of the ballots being duplicates on two of those days. The area under the curve represents around 25-30% of the duplicates, which were received between November 4th and November 9th. This led us to remove the blanks and scribbles from the plot, and the same phenomenon was observed.

In Fulton County, Georgia, it has been acknowledged that 3,600 individual ballots were duplicated, with 36 batches being duplicated. This raises concerns about potential wrongdoing. We eagerly await the release of more information and facts regarding this matter, as it marks the start of a significant period. The voter integrity is at stake.

Fulton County, Georgia admits that 3,600 individual ballots were duplicated in a consent decree. This includes 36 batches of duplicated votes. The extent of this wrongdoing is significant, and people are eager for more information to be revealed. It marks the start of a remarkable period in our history, highlighting the magnitude of voter fraud.

There were duplicates found in the submitted ballots. A total of 16,934 voters submitted 2 duplicated ballots each, while 188 voters submitted 376 duplicates. In total, there were 34,448 duplicates out of 17,126 voters. This information was not included in the report. After removing the duplicates, there were 1,911,918,000 ballots received.

In the 2020 election, we analyzed 30 voters out of a total of 1283. We found examples of voters who had passed away but still cast a ballot. For privacy reasons, we have redacted the obituaries. These cases were confirmed by the Secretary of State and public records. One voter died on September 29, 2020, but their ballot was cast on October 10, 2020, before it was mailed. Another voter who passed away on September 27, 2020, had their ballot envelope dated September 16, 2020. Ballots were not mailed until October 7. There were other instances of voters who had passed away but still voted.

We found 74,243 mail-in ballots in Arizona with no clear record of being sent. In Arizona, EB32s show when a ballot is sent, and EB33s show when it's received. There should be more EB32s than EB33s. These ballots can be linked to specific individuals, but 74,000 came back without proof of being sent to them.