reSee.it - Related Video Feed

My name is Essela, and I found suspicious donations made in your name through Act Blue totaling over $106,000 from 2020 to 2022. I suspect someone is using your identity for money laundering. You have also donated to various political causes. I can show you how to check this information yourself. From 2009 to 2019, you donated around $12,000, but the sudden increase in donations is concerning. Let me know if you want to see the details.

The speaker addresses the issue of illegal donations to politicians in Connecticut. They claim that ACT Blue, a fundraising platform, has raised $12 billion since 2004, with 39% of the donations coming from foreigners, which is illegal. They accuse ACT Blue of giving $700,000 per month to Senators Blumenthal and Murphy using false identities. The speaker also alleges that Connecticut voters registered in multiple states are making contributions to ACT Blue. They question why the Federal Election Commission (FEC) allows this and express frustration with the FEC's lack of response. The speaker mentions a $12,001,000,002 contribution milestone and provides information about small donors and fundraising on the ACT Blue website. They encourage contacting the FEC regarding the illegal contributions.

Six attorney generals are investigating ActBlue. Citizen journalists are assisting in the investigation, and video submissions are being collected. Citizen journalists obtained FEC data showing Heinz Friedrich in Florida apparently donated over 16,000 times, totaling almost $400,000, but he denies making those donations. A record shows multiple donations on the same day for the Friedrich family. The Wellness Company is introducing a first aid emergency kit, offering a 15% discount with code OMG. In Las Vegas, Nevada, Elena Burlow is shown in data to have made about $111,000 in donations over 6 years, but she doesn't believe she donated that much. She checks her bank statements for ActBlue charges. In Salt Lake City, Utah, Marilyn Shear has apparently made almost 3,600 transactions totaling $133,000. She says she donates quite a bit, but that amount doesn't sound correct. It is claimed that senior citizens are being targeted and that accounts are being set up in their names to launder money. The public is asked to contact ActBlue support at 617-517-7600 and record the call while sitting down with the unwitting donor. Redacted bank statements should be sent to tips dot o'keefemediagroup.com.

In politics, money raised is crucial. A group found suspicious donations to Democrats totaling over $200 million through ActBlue, mostly from older, liberal, lower-income individuals. Many donors seem unaware of these contributions made in their name, suggesting identity theft. Examples include a woman making 1400 donations in 7 years and another making 52,501 donations in 700 days. These irregularities raise concerns about potential election law violations and national security risks. Despite 52 complaints filed, Democrats are reluctant to investigate. The magnitude of these questionable donations far exceeds previous concerns over foreign influence, warranting a thorough investigation.

There were suspicious donations made in the name of the speaker, but they do not recognize them. The donations were made using their name and address for small amounts, but the speaker usually only donates around $75. They suspect someone else may be using their information for larger donations. The speaker wants a refund for the unauthorized donations and would have noticed if they were making such large contributions.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a problem where someone is using their names to make donations. Speaker 0 mentions seeing over $3,000 being given multiple times a day. Speaker 1 doubts it's them since they are not in the state and believes the person doesn't know what they're doing. Speaker 0 reveals that the person has donated 1,640 times in the past two years, totaling $14,200. Speaker 2, who is being impersonated, finds this suspicious as they reduced their donations after the midterms. Speaker 0 suggests someone is using Speaker 2's name to donate small amounts, ranging from 60¢ to $738, multiple times a day. Speaker 2 denies making such donations and is concerned about the large total amount. They conclude that it must be someone else or a mistake.

Chairman Comer alleges ActBlue may be one of the largest money laundering operations, rivaling the Biden family's schemes. He says his investigation, similar to the Biden probe, began with suspicious activity reports (SARs) from banks, which flag potential financial crimes. Comer claims that when he requested SARs related to ActBlue from Janet Yellen, his requests were initially denied. After the election, staffers saw hundreds of SARs, confirming suspicions. Comer suggests the media colluded with those protecting Biden, pushing narratives to protect ActBlue. He alleges the media created a false narrative of widespread support for Kamala Harris to mask money laundering, possibly involving foreign entities. Comer says ActBlue's lack of transparency and the departure of its lawyers are suspicious. He cites an example of an 80-year-old woman with a modest income who purportedly made nearly $1 million in donations through ActBlue. Comer believes federal agencies covered up the scheme. He plans to issue a report to the FBI and DOJ after reviewing bank violations. Comer suggests if ActBlue is proven to have cheated, the Democrat party will be destroyed.

FEC discovered suspicious donation patterns from unemployed individuals, with large sums donated through multiple transactions to ActBlue and Democrat campaigns. Investigator Tony Saruga found 400,000 new ActBlue accounts in 30 days. Harris campaign emails requested small donations using fear tactics, including fake names in their lists. The goal appears to be creating a facade of grassroots support while potentially funneling larger sums through these transactions.

FEC data reveals senior citizens making thousands of contributions to political causes. James O'Keefe investigates residents donating large sums through ActBlue, questioning if they are victims or participants in a potential money laundering scheme. Visiting homes, O'Keefe confronts donors like Cindy Ngo and Garland Riggs, who deny making numerous contributions listed under their names. O'Keefe urges citizen journalists to uncover similar cases nationwide. Lawsuits have been filed, and O'Keefe encourages others to investigate. Visit okeithmediagroup.com for more information.

Senior citizens in the US are donating thousands of times a year, raising questions about potential money laundering schemes. A group of citizen journalists investigated these donations, finding individuals who allegedly made numerous contributions. They visited some donors, like Cindy Ngo, who denied making such large donations. Another donor, Garland Riggs, also denied making thousands of contributions. The investigation aims to uncover whether these donors are victims or participants in a possible scheme. The journalist encourages others to investigate by knocking on doors and asking questions. The data was provided by citizen journalists from Election Watch in Maryland.

Kamala Harris raised suspiciously large amounts of money in a short time, sparking concerns about fraudulent donations. An investigation revealed potential money laundering through ActBlue, a democratic fundraising platform. Ordinary citizens' names and addresses were used for large donations they did not make. The source of the money remains unclear, but past reports suggest further scrutiny is needed.

In 2022, you donated 1,100 times totaling $13,150.84. In 2021, it was 715 times for $6,957.90. And in 2020, 839 times for $6,983.10. From 2016 to 2022, the total was $29,107. The speaker denies being able to donate that much due to being on social security and not using the internet much.

James O'Keefe provides an update on the FEC investigation into money laundering through ActBlue. Election watch plans to file a complaint with the FEC and DC, citing discrepancies and apparent fraud in donations, especially from the elderly. The lawsuit will include evidence that 60% of the money involved is coming from China. ActBlue channels funds to other PACs like EMILY's List and Color of Change. Internet tracing reveals transaction patterns, and receipts on the FEC website show large amounts of money going through financial processors like Amalgamated Bank and DB. Many questions remain unanswered, and citizen journalists are encouraged to find answers. Stay tuned.

The speaker questions someone about their involvement in questionable donations made through ActBlue. They mention talking to people in Maryland who denied making the donations listed on ActBlue's website. The speaker is asked to leave and threatened with arrest for trespassing at a location in Massachusetts.

FEC data reveals senior citizens donating thousands of times, sparking concern of money laundering. Investigating Maryland donors, James O'Keefe finds discrepancies in contributions made under their names. Some deny involvement, suggesting potential fraud. O'Keefe urges citizen journalists to question donors, uncovering possible misuse of addresses for donations. Lawsuits filed in Maryland, but issue may extend nationwide. O'Keefe calls for fearless journalists to investigate in their states. Visit okeithmediagroup.com for more information.

Investigative reporters uncover discrepancies in campaign donations through political action committees (PACs) WinRed and ActBlue. They visit the top political donor in New Jersey, Alexandra Gina, who denies making thousands of small donations totaling $154,000. The reporters find that both PACs may be funneling dark money into campaigns, with Democrats benefiting more. They also mention Swiss billionaire Hans Urs Weis contributing millions to progressive causes. The reporters call for accountability and urge viewers to review their own contributions for irregularities. They plan to continue investigating and invite viewers to join their training webinar to become citizen journalists. The concise transcript highlights campaign donation discrepancies, potential dark money involvement, and the call for viewer participation in uncovering the truth.

Discoveries on fec.gov revealed suspicious donation patterns from supposedly unemployed individuals. Four unemployed donors made nearly $198,000 in donations through thousands of transactions. They donated to various Democrat campaigns and PACs, raising questions about the source of their funds. Investigator Tony Saruga found over 400,000 new ActBlue accounts created in 30 days, with Harris campaign emails urging small donations. Fake names were inserted into ActBlue lists, showing up in official emails, suggesting a potential scam to create a facade of grassroots support while funneling larger sums.

An investigation reveals potential discrepancies in campaign donations attributed to unwitting donors through platforms like WinRed and ActBlue. FEC data suggests individuals are donating large sums via numerous small transactions, raising questions about hidden agendas. One New Jersey resident, Alexandra Gina, is listed as donating over $154,000 in three years through thousands of transactions, which she denies. The investigation found that WinRed and ActBlue did not respond to requests for clarification. The report also highlights the influence of foreign money in US elections, mentioning Swiss billionaire Hans Georg Wiese's significant contributions to progressive causes. The team encourages viewers to check their own FEC records for irregularities and report findings. They are also hosting a webinar to train citizen journalists.

FEC data reveals that some senior citizens in the U.S. have made thousands of donations, with one individual reportedly contributing over $200,000 through 12,000 transactions in three years. Investigators visited these donors to verify the data, questioning whether they were victims of a money laundering scheme or complicit in it. Many denied making the reported contributions, with one woman claiming she only donates small amounts occasionally. Another individual, Garland Riggs, was surprised to learn that over 31,000 contributions totaling $230,000 were attributed to his name. The investigation encourages citizen journalism, urging others to ask questions and gather information about these suspicious donations. James O'Keefe reports from Annapolis, Maryland, highlighting the need for transparency in political contributions.

FEC data reveals that some senior citizens across the US are listed as donating thousands of times per year, with some allegedly linked to over $200,000 in contributions. I'm James O'Keefe with OMG in Annapolis, Maryland, investigating these claims. I went to people's houses to ask them about these donations. I spoke with one man who told me to ask Donald Trump. I spoke to Cindy Noe, whose records indicate she donated over a thousand times to ActBlue in one year, totaling almost $19,000. She said she only donates $5 occasionally. Another individual was listed as making 18,000 contributions totaling $170,000, which they denied. I called Garland Riggs, who was listed as making over 31,000 contributions. He denied this. I encourage you to knock on doors and ask your neighbors if they've donated to ActBlue or Biden for President and if they know how many donations were made in their name.

I called Garland Riggs, an 80-year-old with 31,073 donations made under his address. He denies donating to ActBlue. Riggs suspects someone is using his information. He agrees to look into it.

Investigative reporters have discovered that both political action committees, ActBlue and WinRed, may be involved in a scheme where unwitting donors are making numerous small donations throughout the year. The top donor in New Jersey, Alexandra Gina, denies donating as much as the Federal Election Commission (FEC) claims. The FEC data shows Gina allegedly donated $154,000 in the past three years, but she disputes this. The FEC also found that Gina made three separate 5¢ donations to Republican causes. When contacted, neither WinRed nor the FEC provided explanations for these discrepancies. The reporters suspect that dark money is being funneled into campaigns, potentially even from foreign sources. They encourage viewers to investigate their own contributions and report any irregularities. The reporters are hosting a training webinar for aspiring journalists to join their efforts.

James O’Keefe and OMG report on FEC data indicating some senior citizens in the U.S. have donated large volumes of money, with examples of individuals attached to as much as $217,000 in contributions across 12,000 payments over three years, sometimes under variations of names and addresses. The team says the data, drawn from FEC and state records and organized by a group called election watch in Maryland, shows many contributions processed through ActBlue and groups related to political causes. In Annapolis, Maryland, O’Keefe notes the data and asks whether these donors are victims of or participants in a money-laundering scheme, or if they actually engaged in the activity—suggesting actions such as making phone calls or door-knocking to investigate. He describes the process as easy for citizen reporters: bring a microphone and camera (even an iPhone), knock on doors, and call donors to verify. He demonstrates by showing a chart of committees earmarked to receive donations via ActBlue and questions whether the donors are being duped or complicit. During on-camera interactions, he and his team cite a donor with 3,000 contributions totaling $32,000 at a given address, asking the person if she’s aware of such activity. The individual responds that they donated occasionally and not at the stated levels. They also reference the FEC record indicating donations to ActBlue and Biden for President, and question the accuracy of the donor’s claimed totals, while the donor denies making such large-scale contributions and expresses confusion over the situation. One profile highlighted is Cindy Ngo of Annapolis, Maryland, claimed to have contributed over 1,000 times in 2022 for $18,849.77 to ActBlue, which would require daily donations, a claim the interviewee disputes. The donor states they donate occasionally, around $5 at a time, and says they do not believe such frequent contributions were made from her address. The team remarks that the pattern is inconsistent with the donor’s response, noting that the frequency implied by the data does not match the donor’s account. Another profile discussed is Garland Riggs, described as an elderly donor with 31,073 individual contributions under his address, totaling about $230,000. When contacted, Riggs denies donating to ActBlue; he suggests his wife may have donated, but says the amounts are nowhere near the figures alleged. O’Keefe explains he will email the donor the information, including the FEC records, and asks whether Riggs believes someone else might be using his name. The report outlines a method for field inquiries: identify a target by name, confirm whether donations were made in their name and how many times, then ask follow-up questions such as whether they donated 3,000 times. The team emphasizes obtaining comment before publication and notes they have dozens of other homes in Maryland and hundreds nationwide matching the profile. They announce plans to continue calling and visiting more individuals. O’Keefe closes by noting the data came from election watch in Maryland, Gibson Group, and Maryland Twenty Twenty Watch, which have submitted a lawsuit to the U.S. District Court of Maryland regarding the grievance, and invites others to participate as citizen journalists. He directs viewers to okeefmediagroup.com for information on how to pursue similar stories.

The video reveals suspicious donation patterns on fec.gov, with unemployed individuals making numerous small donations totaling tens of thousands of dollars to ActBlue and various Democrat campaigns. Investigator Tony Saruga found over 400,000 new ActBlue accounts created in 30 days, with the Harris campaign sending emails asking for $1 donations using fear tactics. Fake donors were inserted into ActBlue lists, showing the campaign's desperation for small donations to potentially facilitate a larger scam.

FEC data indicates that numerous senior citizens in the US are donating thousands of times annually, with some names and addresses linked to over $200,000 in contributions. We visited some of these individuals to verify the data, suspecting a potential money laundering operation. For example, Cindy Noe of Annapolis, Maryland, purportedly donated to ActBlue over 1,000 times in 02/2022, totaling $18,849.77, which equates to approximately three donations daily. When approached, Cindy acknowledged donating to ActBlue occasionally, but denied donating $18,850 or the possibility of her address being used for such purposes.