TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

We are announcing a $100 million lawsuit against the U.S. government, FBI, CIA, and NYPD, alleging their conspiracy to assassinate Malcolm X over the past three years. We have been uncovering new evidence regularly, including testimonies from individuals who have remained silent about their experiences during the tumultuous 1960s.

The OJ Simpson trial was racially charged due to Rodney King and policing issues. Simpson wasn't a civil rights leader, but symbolized something for the black community. Racial tension then and now stems from America's history of persecution. Without honest discussions on race, divisions like those seen in the OJ Simpson trial will persist.

In 1969, I became deeply involved in the civil rights movement as a kid. I worked at an all-black swimming pool in Wilmington, Delaware, on the east side. I was connected to the thoughts and feelings of the people there, though I did not participate in marches or events like those in Selma.

We changed history using the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which was established to protect newly freed slaves and ensure economic inclusion in government and commercial contracting. Specifically, Section 1981 of this act is crucial. I invested a million dollars in legal fees to hold businesses accountable and ensure they engage respectfully with us. Now, they cannot ignore our presence in the 9th Circuit, as we demand fair treatment in business dealings. This approach is key to making America great again.

We need to organize and participate in mass arrests to gain standing in court. If a group of 50 of us go to a place like Rural King and get arrested, we can then argue that our civil rights were violated. The reason we're in this mess is because we comply. So, let's all go together and demand a jury trial. This will overwhelm the system and eventually lead to the dismissal of our cases, just like they do with rioters. I'm going to do it, and I'll find others who will join me. What they're doing isn't right.

The decision to pursue charges was left to the district attorney, and I chose not to cooperate unless subpoenaed. My choice stemmed from a sense of mercy and the understanding of broader implications. The focus shouldn't be solely on her; the incident highlighted deep racial bias in our country. This bias is evident in systemic issues, such as the lack of voting representation for the largely black and brown population of Washington DC, compared to less populated, predominantly white states. While some celebrate individual cases, we must remain aware of the larger issues, like the rollback of affirmative action. It's crucial to concentrate on eradicating racial bias in significant areas that impact society.

For 9 years, I was a Communist Party member working as an FBI agent. The Communist conspiracy planned a violent revolution in America, disguising it as a Civil Rights movement. They exploited racial differences to divide us, creating chaos and violence. Their goal was to sow discord and weaken our society.

This journey is not just about going to space, but about the training and the team. It wasn't just taking up space, but making space for the future. It wasn't a ride or a destination, but a supernatural journey. You'll never know the amount of love you have inside you to give and receive until the day you launch. It's disappointing to call it a ride, as that implies something frivolous. It was a flight, a journey, duplicating Alan Shepard's trajectory. There was nothing frivolous about what they did or what it took to get the machine up and running and to get them up and back down safely. The inspiration for other women and young girls should not be ignored.

The plan was to portray the civil rights movement as a popular uprising led by a few agitators, deceiving people into thinking it represented the entire African American community. The enemy, referred to as "whitey," was seen as the opposition to this movement. This strategy aimed to create the illusion of widespread support for the cause.

To address prejudices, individuals must first acknowledge their existence. Many are unaware of their biases or fail to recognize the underlying issues. In a nonviolent movement, it's crucial to highlight these problems, compelling people to confront them and reflect on their conscience.

First speaker: Has America ever engaged in a general strike? Like, that’s enough. We’re not showing up to work tomorrow? Second speaker: We’ve never had a general strike. But this Friday on January twenty-third, there is an ice out of Minnesota, day of action. It’s a shutdown day where people will be staying home from work, refusing to participate in economic activities. So a power and they’re calling on Americans across the country to show solidarity. First speaker: One of the problems with Minnesota right now is you have people like Kristi Noem or the people who are heading up ICE saying that it’s not nonviolent resistance. They’re saying someone like Renee Good was actually a threat to those people or that filming an ICE agent—or documenting, which is perfectly legal—is a form of threat, and therefore they justify using violence in return to the threat of violence from these people. What do you do when what your nonviolent action is perceived as violence by the people who can use violence against you? Second speaker: Declaring peaceful protesters violent or domestic terrorists or outside agitators is what autocrats all around the world do. That is their playbook, is to make people fearful and to try to undermine the legitimacy of protesters. So what are we seeing in Minneapolis right now? What have we seen in our history in this country? Think about the civil rights movement, profound state violence used against protesters. They prepared, they trained, they role played, they organized all to make that political violence backfire. Think of Selma, the peaceful march. So when peaceful disciplined protesters confronted the dogs, the hoses, the response—It revealed the cruelty when the disciplined protesters were faced with this form of violence. And so that’s how disciplined nonviolent resistance can make state violence repression backfire.

A new documentary tells the truth about school closures during the pandemic, and it should anger you. Fifteen days is a story of how teachers unions teamed up with progressive NGOs to use the health crisis to reimagine society using our families, our children, as guinea pigs. It's called fifteen days. It comes from Restore Childhood. Natalia Morocver is the founder of Restore Childhood, and she joins us today to discuss it. So thank you so much for joining us. Speaker 1: Thank you so much, Natalie, for having me. Speaker 0: Now the documentary is really upsetting, and I think it's because a lot of us have kind of blocked it, what we've gone through and what people put on our children. Why do you think it is important to bring this back up now? Speaker 1: Well, I think that what they did with the school closures has not really ended. I don't think the schools that our children left in 2020 were the ones they returned to, and in fact, many kids didn't return. There's still incredible chronic absenteeism. The teachers' unions always kind of wring their hands and say, well, we don't know where the kids go, but actually, we drove them out. Additionally, there hasn't really been any kind of accountability. Randy Weingarten is still orchestrating. She's written a new book. She is not taking any responsibility for what happened. Her motto is kids are resilient, but actually, our documentary is dedicated to a young man who took his life just this past May because he struggled so much with mental health issues when school shut down. He's not the only one. Speaker 0: Right. I think about what really hits me is all the things that kids didn't have. You you there's a joke in isn't it a joke in pretty in pink that if you miss your prom, your whole life will be ruined? Like, these are things we cannot give these kids back. That's there's no resilience to taking things from these children. So you make it clear in the documentary that, you know, there were a lot of sort of militant teachers just and and organizers and administrators just going along with what they thought was right. But there has to be a bad guy behind the bad guy orchestrating this or else independent thinkers would not have done this.

At 21 years old, I walked into the Senate chamber and got arrested. Later, I tried to see Nelson Mandela in South Africa and got arrested again. I even met him once. The campaign says I wasn't arrested, but I couldn't move and was stopped by the cops. I didn't experience the struggles of historical figures like Douglass, Tubman, King, Lewis, Goodman, Chaney, and Swerner, but I walked my own path.

Viola Greg Liuzzo, a martyr for civil rights, was shot dead while driving in Alabama with a Black civil rights worker. The press highlighted her 5 children, 3 husbands, and removal from Michigan's voter list for not voting in 6 years. The photo used to gain sympathy was from 20 years earlier.

They set us up by asking us to come in 2 hours later, when they actually needed us right away. They set us up, and it was a complete setup.

Rosa Parks was recruited by the NAACP as an ideal plaintiff for a planned lawsuit against the bus line. This wasn't a spontaneous act; they strategically chose her to sit in a specific spot on the bus to create a strong legal case. This preparation adds depth to her story, showcasing the thoughtfulness behind the civil rights movement. Parks was seen as a compelling figure to represent the cause.

Speaker 0 marched in the civil rights movement to change attitudes. They were involved in desegregating movie theaters and organizing voter registration drives. Speaker 0 sat in black churches with Jewish rabbis, preparing to desegregate movie theaters. They have been involved in causes since they were 18, including desegregating restaurants. However, according to the New York Times, Speaker 2 claims that Speaker 0 lied about marching in the civil rights movement. Despite being reminded of this, Speaker 0 continued to tell the story. Speaker 2 finds this behavior strange.

In 1961, we embarked on a Freedom Ride. On August 28, 1963, we participated in the March on Washington, where we met President John Fitzgerald Kennedy. Later, on August 6, 19, we fought for the signing of the Voting Rights Act. We felt hopeful and excited. When we witness injustice, it is our moral duty to speak up and take action. Our future generations will question what we did and said. Although voting may pose challenges for some, we have a mission and a mandate to stand on the right side of history.

I was involved in the civil rights movement as a high school kid, desegregating movie theaters and restaurants. I sat in black churches next to Jewish rabbis, preparing to desegregate movie theaters. Despite not actually marching, I remained engaged in civil rights causes since I was 18. Despite being reminded that I did not march, I continued to tell the story. This behavior is strange. Translation: I participated in civil rights activities as a teenager, desegregating establishments and sitting in churches. Even though I didn't physically march, I stayed committed to civil rights causes. Despite being reminded of this, I continued to share the story, which is odd.

The civil rights movement is claimed to be part of a communist plot to enslave humanity. More evidence exists, but time limits discussion. Study further to understand the plan to subjugate the US. Avoid falling into the trap of division and work with others to save the country for future generations. Recommended reading includes "It's Very Simple, The True Story of Civil Rights" by Alan Stange and other materials available at American opinion libraries nationwide.

They set us up. They set up 64 and asked us to come up 2 hours later. They needed everyone immediately. We're doing away with the game. They set us up for failure.

They set us up. They really did. They needed everyone right away, and it felt like a setup. Did you need water? Here, take this.

Many were deceived into supporting a conspiracy disguised by appealing slogans and humanitarian goals. Some staged sit-ins, others did freedom rides, picketed, protested, or boycotted buses. Like in Cuba, leaders of the freedom movement in the US marched in unity. They marched arm in arm, echoing the cry of "We shall overcome." Translation: Many people were misled into backing a hidden agenda under the guise of noble causes. Actions like sit-ins, freedom rides, protests, and boycotts were taken. Similar to Cuba, leaders in the US marched together in solidarity, chanting "We shall overcome."

There were fine people on both sides of the protest over a statue being taken down and a park being renamed from Robert E. Lee.

The transcript describes a live segment about an operation called “operation pull up,” described as clandestine and clandestine in nature, with the aim of disrupting business as usual by showing up somewhere locations where they are not expected. The host, Speaker 0, explains that although the operation may appear MAGA-coded due to the presence of many white people, there is a stated reason for this: “it's because of the the what they're the operation that they're doing today. It's important to have allies, as they said, white allies here.” The host notes turning the camera away from some participants because they are “giving some critical information here,” then signals that the team is ready to proceed. Nakima Levy Armstrong, identified as a civil rights attorney and longtime activist in the community, is introduced on the show. Armstrong is associated with Friday’s appearance on the program and is described as part of the movement’s leadership. The segment then defines the core tactic of the movement: “operation pull up, more of a clandestine operation. We show up somewhere location. They don't expect us to come there, and then we disrupt business as usual.” This explanation frames the operation as an intentional surprise tactic aimed at creating disruption at targeted sites. The group emphasizes their track record of success with previous demonstrations conducted under the same method. Specifically, they mention actions taken after George Floyd’s death, where they “went to the police federation head's, home and staged a demonstration there.” They also reference attention to federal law enforcement, noting they “went to the head of the US marshals from Minnesota after Winston Smith was killed by the US marshals.” Additional examples include action taken after Daunte Wright’s death, with a mention that this followed when AG Keith Ellis—presumably Keith Ellison—was involved, though the transcript cuts off before completing that description. Overall, the narrative centers on a strategic, surprise-based protest approach designed to create disruption at chosen targets, with a history of proactive demonstrations aimed at police and federal authorities following fatalities involving Black individuals. The speakers signal that the operation is ongoing and that more details will be observed as it unfolds live on the Don Lemon Show. The dialogue also underscores the organizers’ insistence on the value of diverse coalition support, noting the presence of white allies as part of the operation’s stated rationale.