TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In the 2020 Maricopa General Election, 120,867 ballots, or 6% of the total, were compromised through forced adjudication. This represents 9 times the deciding outcome of the election. The compromise was an intentional and avoidable paper and ink hack, where control over the ballot stock was necessary. The use of Sharpie pens, which were encouraged for the first time in history, combined with inferior ballot paper, caused bleed-through votes that confused the scanning machine. This allowed for extra votes to be counted, leading to potential election manipulation. The net effect of this hack in Maricopa County was approximately 120,867 compromised ballots.

I found that there were approximately 25,000 ballots in Maricopa County that were not printed from the official Dominion PDF ballot. These ballots had imperfections in the lines and circles, unlike the perfect PDF printing. The imperfections were consistent across all the ballots, suggesting they were not genuine. These 25,000 questionable ballots alone exceed Joe Biden's margin of victory by over double.

3% of pre-election voting ballots were altered using HAMR and ScoreCard software, potentially impacting the national vote. An algorithm was used to adjust votes for Biden in specific areas, like Michigan where a glitch favored Trump by 55100 votes in one district. Similar issues are suspected in other states with thousands of ballots appearing for Biden, statistically implausible.

An expert witness confirmed that the voting machines, certified for nine years, are lawful and in good working condition. However, on election day, over half the machines malfunctioned, leading to significant disenfranchisement of Republican voters. A whistleblower from Runback revealed that approximately 300,000 ballots were illegally inserted into the tally, not from authorized drop boxes or polling locations, but brought in by employees without following the lawful chain of custody. This situation presents substantial evidence of wrongdoing in the election process.

An observer in the duplication room witnessed the preparation of a new ballot because the original was soiled. The observer read a Trump Republican ballot to their Democratic partner. When the partner entered it into the system, the ballot defaulted to a Biden Democratic ballot on the screen. This was reported to supervisors, and others claimed to have witnessed the same manipulation. No corrective action was communicated. The next day, the observer was scolded for saying the machines were not working correctly and was told not to discuss anything. Many people were threatened with being removed from the room or not being allowed to work there again if they spoke out. The observer believes it is their duty to speak the truth.

Two Clark County technical employees independently revealed that they found discrepancies in the number of votes recorded by voting machines. The votes would change between the closing of polls at night and their reopening the next morning. This means that votes were appearing and disappearing during the night. When they tried to verify the integrity of the voting machines, they were only allowed to visually inspect the outside of a USB drive, which was useless. They were denied a forensic examination.

The speaker discusses a discrepancy in the vote count between Biden and Trump, stating that the actual results showed Trump with a significant lead. They explain that the voting machine is designed to generate errors, which then go to adjudication where thousands of ballots can be bulk adjudicated with one click. A high rate of 68% of the ballots needed adjudication, compared to the federal allowable rate of 1 in 125,000. The program is intentionally designed to generate errors and move votes from one candidate to another. However, on November 4, all system files, adjudication files, and internet files were deleted, which is significant.

The speaker discusses an incident where there were errors in the vote count for Biden and Trump. They explain that the voting machine generated a high number of errors, which were then sent for adjudication. The rate of ballots needing adjudication was 68%, much higher than the federal allowable rate of 1 in 125,000. The speaker suggests that this program is designed to generate errors and manipulate votes. They also mention that on November 4th, all system files related to adjudication were deleted. This is seen as a significant issue.

Disturbing breaches of protocol were observed during the election. USB vCard drives from voting machines were mixed together with cartridges and paper tapes, destroying any chance of forensic auditability and compromising the chain of custody. Despite objections, an individual plugged unsecured USB cards into vote counting computers, resulting in a sudden increase of 50,000 votes for Vice President Biden. Initially, 47 USB cards were missing, but that number has reportedly grown to 64. Additionally, a room containing 60,000 to 70,000 unopened mail-in ballots was discovered days after the vote count, with no knowledge of their origin or whereabouts. The absence of signed chain of custody documents raises questions about the source and destination of these ballots.

The 2020 election had 9,000 updates, with 4 extreme updates that had a less than 1 tenth of one percent chance of happening. These updates were argued to be human errors, but if they were corrected, where is the evidence? Some claim that the spikes indicate heavily democratic precincts, but California doesn't show similar spikes. The strangest anomaly is a consistent ratio of Biden to Trump votes across time, which seems theoretically impossible. This pattern appears in many states, suggesting a computer algorithm called weighted race distribution is involved. Diebold voting machines, known for giving values to votes, have been linked to vote switching in past elections. Dominion Voting Systems acquired Diebold's software. Eyewitness and video evidence in Georgia shows a poll worker named Ruby in a backroom filled with absentee ballots.

The speakers assert that there is evidence of direct access to the Antrim County election management system (EMS). In the forensic images, they note that on November 5 an anonymous user logged onto the EMS remotely and performed actions with escalated privileges, making changes to the database during attempts to retabulate the election. They describe this as a major development, because it demonstrates that the machines were accessed remotely, and crucially, that the remote access was by an anonymous user who possessed elevated privileges within the system. They present this as a significant point for those who oppose forensic auditing or who are against non-forensic reviews. They also reference visible features on ballots, specifically the black boxes along the side of the ballot. The ballots reportedly contain 59 of these black boxes. In the forensic images, they indicate that certain blocks—numbers 15, 18, 28, 41, and 44—were intentionally modified. The described modifications concerned the height, width, and overall shape of these blocks, with the stated purpose of generating errors. Regarding the consequences of these modifications, the narrative claims that by altering these specific blocks, errors were created that led to rejections of Republican ballots. In other words, ballots cast for Donald Trump that were processed through the machine allegedly faced a higher likelihood of being rejected due to these block modifications. The asserted outcome is that such ballots were rejected at a rate of 20% more than ballots cast for Joe Biden.

Speaker 0 asserts that there was direct access to the Antrim County election management system (EMS). They claim that on November 5, an anonymous user logged on to the EMS remotely with escalated privileges and made changes to the database while attempting to retabulate the election. This, they say, constitutes a significant development, proving that the machines were remotely accessed and that access was by an anonymous user with elevated system privileges. Speaker 0 also discusses ballots, referring to black boxes on the side of the ballot, noting that there are 59 such black boxes. They state that forensic images show that in Antrim County, blocks 15, 18, 28, 41, and 44 were intentionally modified. The modification involved altering the height, width, and shape of those blocks with the intention of generating errors. They describe the consequence of such modifications: by modding these specific blocks, they were able to cause rejections for Republican ballots. Specifically, they claim that if a ballot voted for Donald Trump and was fed into the machine, that ballot was rejected at a rate 20% higher than for Joe Biden ballots.

Vote totals were altered through digital pre-election ballots using a program called Hammer and software named Scorecard, leading to significant nationwide changes. An algorithm was employed to adjust votes for Biden in specific areas, which explains a computer glitch in Michigan that resulted in a 55,100 vote shift in favor of Trump in one district. This raises concerns that similar software glitches could affect other districts in Michigan. Additionally, there have been reports of hundreds of thousands of ballots appearing exclusively for Biden, which seems statistically improbable.

Two Clark County Technical employees reported that the vote counts recorded by machines and stored on USB drives changed overnight after polls closed. Votes seemed to appear and disappear during this time. Attempts to verify the integrity of the voting machines were met with limitations; only a superficial visual inspection of the USB drives was permitted, while a forensic examination was denied.

A scanner can only scan one dollar per second, but there are 4,000 ballots with the exact same time stamp of November 5th at 11:19:40. This suggests that these ballots may have been inserted and cannot be authenticated. The main question is whether this time stamp, which shows an unbelievable speed of scanning, is from the EMS system and not something we created.

County technical employees reported independently that the vote counts recorded by machines and stored on USB drives changed between the closing of polls and their reopening the next morning. Votes appeared and disappeared overnight. Attempts to verify the integrity of these voting machines were limited to a superficial visual inspection of the USB drives, and a forensic examination was denied.

There was fraud in the election, including dead people voting. The machines played a role in this fraud. Instead of having hidden ballots, they stored them in a secret folder. After the polls closed, the machines matched unvoted ballots with unvoted voters. This was evident when the vote percentage reached 99% but the votes kept coming in. The denominator, which represents the remaining ballots, started increasing, indicating that they were unloading the hidden ballots and matching them to unvoted voters. This allowed them to barely cross the finish line with enough votes.

During the election, there were damaged mail-in ballots that couldn't be read by scanners. The board decided to duplicate these ballots using pink highlighters. However, the highlighter couldn't be read by the scanners either, so all the duplicated ballots had to be fixed. The solution was to give workers stacks of blank mail-in ballots to individually fill in the correct ovals with a dark pen. This process went on for hours without observation until the observers confronted the deputy commissioner. Eventually, thousands of mail-in ballots were counted this way. This raises concerns about the integrity of the process.

Multiple witnesses reported that ballots were reversed, affecting around 50-70 votes within the first hour of polling. The problem persisted throughout the day, with the voting machine warehouse supervisor, James Savage, identified as the source. Savage, a high-level Democrat operative, was seen plugging v drives into the computer system, potentially altering votes. Another witness observed Savage inserting USB drives into voting machines days after the election, allegedly flipping 50,000 votes. This manipulation was deemed crucial as it controlled the election outcome.

3% of pre-election voting ballots were changed using the HAMR and ScoreCard software programs, potentially causing a significant nationwide shift in the vote. An algorithm was also used to calculate additional votes for Mr. Biden in specific areas, like Michigan, where a computer glitch resulted in a 5,500 vote change in favor of President Trump in one district. Similar issues may have occurred in other states. Hundreds of thousands of ballots mysteriously appeared for Mr. Biden, which defies statistical probability.

According to the report, Dominion Voting Systems is alleged to have intentional errors that can lead to fraud and influence election results. The system allows election workers to decide votes without oversight or transparency. Experts found an error rate of 68.05%, much higher than the recommended rate. Suspiciously, all vote adjudication logs for the 2020 election and security logs before November 4th are missing. The Dominion Image cast prison cards were also reprogrammed, violating election laws. Despite calls for transparency through forensic audits, skeptics have attacked attempts to review logs. In Maricopa County, Arizona, election officials have ignored subpoenas for election data and machine audits until after the inauguration.

I found that there were 5,000 different ballots created for specific districts in Maricopa County. Additionally, approximately 25,000 ballots did not match the official Dominion PDF ballot, with consistent imperfections around an oval on each one. These 25,000 unidentifiable ballots alone exceed Joe Biden's 10,457 vote margin.

3% of pre-election voting ballots were changed using the HAMR and ScoreCard software programs, potentially causing a significant nationwide shift in the vote. An algorithm was also used to calculate votes needed for Mr. Biden in specific areas, possibly explaining the computer glitch in Michigan that resulted in a 5,500 vote change in favor of President Trump. Similar issues may have occurred in other states, with hundreds of thousands of ballots mysteriously appearing solely for Mr. Biden, which is statistically implausible. Further investigation is needed to check for software glitches in all districts and understand the extent of these changes.

The speaker discusses how the vote total may have been altered through the HAMMER program and ScoreCard software, affecting the election outcome. They mention a computer glitch in Michigan that favored President Trump, suggesting similar issues in other states. They question the sudden appearance of thousands of ballots for Biden, deeming it statistically improbable.

The speaker highlights that the number of misfeeds in the voting system is much higher than the federal standard of one out of 500. They mention that the insertion errors were a significant issue throughout Election Day, contrary to reports claiming it was a minor problem. The system log files reveal that there were consistently over 7,000 ballot insertion failures every 30 minutes from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m., with some intervals exceeding 8,000 errors. The problem persisted throughout the day despite technicians attempting to fix it.