TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In November 2022, the speaker investigated a Muslims-only mosque and migrant shelter near the Tijuana wall. They discovered individuals from Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Chechnya, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and other countries known for terrorist activities. These individuals, referred to as special interest aliens, were brought in without proper vetting. The speaker believes that the government is not conducting thorough screenings for these people. They also mention the recent influx of Haitians. Another report reveals that over 220,000 immigrants have been allowed to fly directly into the US from their home countries. The speakers express their frustration and call for criminal charges against those responsible, referring to the situation as an invasion and an act of treason against the country.

A person stated they paid a cartel around $10,000. They believe the American people are right to be concerned about who is entering the country, because there's no guarantee that everyone is "good." They ask what if they are killers or psychopaths. They claim there is no security bill, security check, or background check. They express worry about who is crossing the border, stating that some people do not look normal.

Speaker 0 discusses safeguards around Social Security numbers and benefits usage, asserting that a capable person will work to ensure individuals with Social Security numbers use them for proper purposes and are not on benefit programs inappropriately. He then states that more than 6,000 individuals have already been identified through their work as being on the terrorist watch list and as known criminals, and he questions how such a situation could occur. He attributes this situation to political leadership, naming Joe Biden and describing the outcome as a “train wreck” in the White House, adding that it will require substantial effort to clean up. He provides a specific statistic for emphasis: in the last four and a half years, over 9,000,000 people have received Social Security numbers who are not U.S. citizens. He clarifies that these may include people with some form of legal status, but asserts that many are illegals who were issued Social Security numbers within the same period. From there, he presents a policy stance: those non-citizens, especially those who are here illegally, should not be using Social Security numbers to participate in U.S. programs. He argues they should be removed or given an opportunity to return to their home country on their own, framing this as a position aligned with President Trump’s preferences, specifically that everybody should be given the opportunity to go home if they wish to. The passage ends with a transition to a question, “Question. As you know, there have been,” indicating an impending line of inquiry related to the preceding points, though the transcript cuts off before the question is presented in full. The overall focus is on identifying misuse and non-citizens receiving Social Security numbers, questioning the administration’s handling of immigration and eligibility, and aligning these concerns with a political stance attributed to Trump.

We're seeing a unified effort across President Trump's national security team and the Department of Homeland Security to ensure a safe, free, and prosperous society for Americans. Over 21 million people have crossed our borders illegally under the Biden administration, many unvetted. For example, over 4,000 people from Central Asia, affiliated with an ISIS network, crossed our borders. Hundreds were identified as known terrorists or associated with known terrorists. This information was provided to the Biden administration, yet only a fraction of those arrested were deported or remained in custody; the rest were released into our country. We're working with the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI to keep Americans safe. Our counterterrorism center is focused on vetting to identify and remove those who pose a threat. The president's designation of cartels as foreign terrorist organizations is crucial, especially with their tactics mirroring those of Islamist terrorists. Our mission is clear: to keep the American people safe.

People have been continuously crossing the border, with 30 individuals hitting the terror screening database since October 1st. In Lukeville, another area where people are arriving, individuals from Bangladesh, Egypt, China, Senegal, and Angola have been seen. One man from Angola shared that he spent five months traveling and thousands of dollars to fly to Brazil. He then made a dangerous journey through the Darien Gap, Central America, and Mexico to reach his current location. The outcome of his situation, like many others, remains uncertain. This is a concerning issue.

The speaker questions the security protocols and suggests that the government did not vet the individuals on the extensive lists. They doubt that the speaker personally verified each person's security risk before allowing them in. The speaker rejects the government's attempt to solely blame the speaker and emphasizes that it is the government's responsibility. They advise the speaker not to take collective responsibility for the incident.

Speaker 0 asked how many Afghans have been admitted to the United States through parole since the fall of Kabul, and whether the administration will review each individual’s status on a case-by-case basis as the two-year parole period expires. Speaker 1 replied that he would be pleased to provide the data but does not have it at the moment. Speaker 0 asserted that 70,192 Afghans were brought to the United States and placed on parole for two years, and again pressed the question of whether each individual’s status would be reviewed on a case-by-case basis as parole periods come to an end. Speaker 1 described the program as Operation Allies Welcome, a government initiative designed to provide refuge for many individuals. He stated that they were screened and vetted by government personnel and that they were brought in on categorical parole. When parole periods are subject to renewal, he said, they will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. Speaker 0 then referenced Fort McCoy in his state, noting that two years earlier the commander there said individuals were not interviewed on a case-by-case basis. He argued that Afghanistan, a region described as a terror hotbed, should have used the Special Immigrant Visa process, but the previous administration did not route those who came in from Afghanistan through the SIV. He asked about the damage caused at Fort McCoy during the period when more than 12,000 Afghans arrived. Speaker 1 responded by reiterating that the individuals who benefited from Operation Allies Welcome were indeed screened and vetted by government personnel and were brought in on categorical parole, not through the Special Immigrant Visa process. He then stated that Fort McCoy sustained $145,600,000 in damage and that the place was virtually destroyed. He concluded the exchange with a brief transition, signaling a move to another topic.

The speaker states they will bring back the border security bill that Donald Trump tanked and do more to secure the border. To reduce illegal border crossings, they will take further action to keep the border closed between ports of entry. Those who cross unlawfully will be apprehended, removed, and barred from reentering for 5 years, with repeat violators facing more severe criminal charges. The speaker claims that if someone does not make an asylum request at a legal point of entry and instead crosses unlawfully, they will be barred from receiving asylum. The speaker's goal is to have an orderly and secure system, while understanding that many people are desperate to migrate to the United States.

We don't need to build a wall; it's not an emergency. The idea that terrorists are invading through the southern border is false. Recent reports indicate that some individuals with suspected ties to ISIS crossed the border over a year ago. Alarmingly, during a three-year period, over 100 people on the terrorist watch list were released into the U.S. under the Biden administration. Among the record number of migrants crossing the border, one was linked to an Afghan terror organization. Border patrol agents encountered at least 375 illegal migrants on the terror watch list, with 99 released into American communities, including thousands from Afghanistan, China, Iran, Syria, and Uzbekistan. The notion of a wall is not a solution to this issue.

In November 2022, the speaker visited a mosque and migrant shelter in Tijuana near the border wall. They met people from Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Chechnya, Kyrgyzstan, Iran, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and other countries. These individuals are known as special interest aliens and are not supposed to cross the border without proper screening. The speaker believes that the government is not effectively vetting these individuals. They also criticize the administration for allowing immigrants to fly directly from their home countries to the US. Another speaker calls for criminal charges against those responsible, referring to the situation as an invasion and treason against the country.

Speaker 0 describes a national targeting center that identifies individuals who have committed crimes, either in this country or in their home country, including those with criminal charges or convictions. He states that many of these individuals are already in jails or prisons in various states, and he emphasizes the request to local law enforcement to turn these people over to federal authorities. As an example, he notes that they have asked Governor Walz and Mayor Fry to hand over criminals they have in jail, alleging that 490 murderers, rapists, and drug traffickers have been released onto the streets instead of being transferred. Speaker 1 comments that some individuals have multiple names, creating a challenge. He explains that the problem includes people who enter illegally, may not have a social security card or a passport, and for whom there is no database in their home country because it is not a friendly country. Speaker 0 adds that some individuals have lied on their paperwork to enter the country, then overstayed and failed to appear for immigration court hearings after being notified. He mentions DUIs and other incidents as part of the context. He clarifies that their approach is to target those who have committed criminal acts, and if they encounter a TDA member in an apartment with 12 other people, they will ask those other people who they are and what their identity is, just as in any other law enforcement operation. He asserts that people misunderstand that they are doing the same thing law enforcement has done for years under the Biden administration, without changes to their methods in these situations. Speaker 0 reiterates that they ask everyone present who they are and why they are affiliated, especially when surrounded by criminals, and emphasizes that their actions are consistent with established law enforcement practices.

As president, the speaker instituted national security travel bans to keep terrorists, jihadists, and violent extremists out of the country. Kamala Harris and Joe Biden revoked the travel ban immediately on their first day in office, and they have let terrorists pour across the borders like never before. The speaker claims to have never seen numbers like this. The speaker states they will keep America safe and keep radical Islamic terrorists out of the country.

I paid a cartel $10,000 to cross the border. The American people are right, they don't know who's coming in. There's no security or background checks, so there could be killers or psychopaths. It's concerning that abnormal-looking people might be crossing the border.

The speaker states he cannot smuggle a terrorist into the United States, calling the question preposterous. He says they are not fond of releasing terrorists into the country, and that they turned the murder capital of the world into the safest country in the Western Hemisphere. Another speaker clarifies the individual in question is a citizen of El Salvador who was illegally in the United States and was returned to his country. He states that the foreign policy of the United States is conducted by the president, not by a court. Another speaker adds that the Supreme Court held that no court has the authority to compel the foreign policy function in the United States. He claims the policy is that foreign terrorists who are here illegally get expelled from the country.

An Afghan national, who worked for the CIA in Afghanistan, was arrested for allegedly planning an election day terror plot. He was brought to the US after the collapse of Afghanistan. The reporter states that the agency claims it was through the SIV program, but the State Department denies this, stating he was never issued an SIV or immigrant visa and was paroled into the US by DHS. The reporter asks the secretary how the man was brought to the US, what screening he underwent, and what he applied for. The secretary declines to answer, stating he is there to discuss disaster relief efforts. The reporter presses, noting conflicting information from the agency and State Department. The reporter asks for assurance that appropriate steps have been taken to secure the country against threats, questioning whether the man was radicalized before or after entering the US.

We are committed to ensuring that only U.S. citizens participate in elections, and so far, there is no evidence of noncitizen voting. However, there have been instances where noncitizens voted; this year, 135 were identified as having voted, with another 400 registered but not yet voting. Just because something is illegal doesn't mean we shouldn't have measures in place to prevent it, similar to how we maintain TSA for air travel security.

Was the withdrawal from Afghanistan successful? The evacuation led by the Department of Defense and State was historic in scale. However, when asked how many evacuees were vetted before boarding flights to the U.S., the response was unclear. It was stated that 100% of individuals arriving in the U.S. had been screened, but specific numbers for those boarding planes in Afghanistan were not provided. The claim was made that over 99% were fully vetted before boarding, but the speaker could not confirm details about the vetting process at Kabul Airport. Ultimately, there was a lack of clarity on the exact vetting numbers prior to boarding.

The discussion centers on the Afghanistan withdrawal and the vetting of evacuees who boarded planes. The opening exchange frames the withdrawal as a historic evacuation led by the Department of Defense and the Department of State. The senator asks specifically how many of the evacuees were vetted before they got on the plane. The official responds by stating it is the policy to vet and screen evacuees for the United States. When the senator presses for a numerical figure, the official first indicates uncertainty about Afghanistan-specific cases but reiterates the policy. The senator clarifies the question: for those who got on the C-17s and other planes, how many were vetted before they boarded, by American officials? The official replies that for those brought to the United States, it is their policy to vet and screen 100% of them. The senator pushes for a precise, testable number, asking if the answer is a sworn 100%. The official reiterates the policy and adds that all of the individuals who arrived in the United States have been screened. The senator presses further, asking for the exact percentage, and the official begins to provide a quantified estimate: well over 99% of them were fully screened and vetted before they boarded a flight. The senator seeks sources for that information, but the official continues, noting that if any were not screened before boarding, they would have been screened and vetted while in flight, and if any derogatory information was found, they would be placed in immigration enforcement proceedings and removal. The senator then asks directly, under oath, whether the 99% figure refers to all people who got on the planes in Afghanistan. The official clarifies that precision is important and notes that the question being asked concerns planes from transit countries, the third country scenario, rather than the specific Afghan departures being discussed at that moment. The senator emphasizes the focus on people who got on the planes and left the chaotic airport, asking again for the percentage vetted before they got on those planes. The official ultimately asserts that he cannot speak to those planes from transit countries, but reiterates that the discussion about those who arrived in the United States involves screening and vetting, and that those arrivals have been screened. The exchange ends with the senator acknowledging the limitation, and the official indicating that he cannot provide a detailed accounting for the transpiring circumstances of planes from transit countries, while maintaining that those who arrived in the United States were screened.

The speaker questions how individuals from Lebanon, Nigeria, Syria, Iraq, China, and Cuba are entering the country and their reasons for coming. They claim that the individuals arriving are primarily single adult males between 18 and 40 years old, not families. The speaker asks why these individuals are being allowed in. They express concern about the situation, stating it is a matter of "life and death" due to fentanyl, criminals, killers, and drug dealers.

The exchange centers on who is responsible for approving an asylum claim linked to an Afghan individual who was part of the Afghanistan evacuation and who was involved in a deadly incident in Washington, D.C. The dialogue is combative and procedural as members press for accountability and a straight answer. - Speaker 0 references a National Guardsman’s death in an incident involving the same individual, calling it an unfortunate accident, while Speaker 1 insists it was a terrorist act and asserts the guard member was shot in the head. The interaction escalates as Speaker 0 seeks clarification about who approved the asylum application for this person. - Speaker 0 asks plainly: “Who approved the asylum claim?” Speaker 1 responds that the asylum application was thoroughly filled out by information gathered by the Biden administration and that the asylum process was put into place under rules established by the Biden administration. Speaker 0 counters that, by implication, the Trump administration had changed the vetting process and the asylum had moved forward under those changes, prompting a dispute over attribution of responsibility. - Speaker 1 emphasizes that the evacuation of Afghanistan under Operation Allies Welcome was “thoroughly vetted by the Biden administration at that point in time” and insists that the individual’s asylum process followed the vetting and rules established by the Biden administration. Speaker 0 pushes back, pressing for a yes-or-no determination of who approved the asylum. - Speaker 2 offers a different framing, stating that the individual was vetted to serve as a soldier in Afghanistan and that this vetting standard was used by the Biden administration “as a ruse to bring him here.” He asserts that had standard operating procedures for special immigrant visas been followed, “none of the Allies Welcome people would have come to America,” attributing responsibility to President Biden. He also invokes a point of order and references a murder “that took place in DC,” insisting the prior description as “unfortunate” was inappropriate. - The dialogue includes interruptions and procedural motions: Speaker 2 asserts the comment about a murder was not a valid point of order; a separate speaker notes that the incident being discussed was not merely an “unfortunate incident” but a murder. - Throughout, the participants accuse each other of misattributing the asylum approval to the wrong administration and of altering vetting processes, with repeated demands for a straightforward answer about who approved the asylum application and persistent insistence that the Biden administration’s vetting and rules were the basis for the asylum decision. The exchange ends with procedural interjections and the continuation of the dispute over responsibility for the asylum approval and the accompanying tragic incident.

The Biden administration is allowing migrants to bypass ID checks at airports, raising security concerns. A recent DHS report reveals that illegal migrants can use the CBP One app instead of traditional identification, even choosing whether to allow officers to take their photo. This practice may inadvertently increase national security risks, according to the inspector general. A DHS spokesperson disputed the report, claiming it lacks context. However, the national security director for air marshals emphasized that unvetted individuals on flights pose a threat, as they can repeatedly fly without proper identification, often on taxpayer-funded flights.

Secretary Mayorkas has put national security at risk, allowing terrorists and enemies to flood across the border. There's been a surge in Chinese nationals, many military-age men with ties to the PLA and CCP, released into the U.S. by Secretary Mayorkas. It's likely China is using Russia's template of sending military personnel into the U.S. There are 10,000 Chinese nationals illegally crossing into the U.S. being released into the country this fiscal year. Today's hearing will investigate the details and effects of Mayorkas' dereliction of duty. The speaker hopes the American people, the press, and the President will take note of these failures.

The speaker questions the implementation of a phone app called CBP 1 that allows noncitizens without appropriate documents to schedule appointments and be admitted at certain border points. The speaker criticizes the lack of asylum requirements and interviews for those using the app, claiming that individuals are simply released into the country. The speaker also raises concerns about the cost and development of the app. The discussion then shifts to the increase in Chinese nationals crossing the border, with the speaker questioning if any of them are members of the Chinese Communist Party. The secretary of Homeland Security denies the claims and states that individuals who pose a security threat are detained. However, the secretary is unable to provide specific information about the incident involving busloads of Chinese nationals.

According to Speaker 1, the open border is the biggest national security vulnerability the country has ever seen. CBP data indicates that 1,272 Iranian nationals were released into the country under Joe Biden, compared to zero under the Trump administration. Speaker 1 claims that under President Trump, the U.S. had the most secure border in history, preventing the release of special interest aliens. While over 10,000,000 people crossed the border under Joe Biden, the biggest concern is the 2,000,000 known gotaways. Speaker 1 states that these individuals crossed undetected because Border Patrol was overwhelmed, creating a significant national security vulnerability.

The speaker states they were asked how they could smuggle a terrorist into the United States or return one to the United States. The speaker finds the question preposterous. They claim they don't know how they could smuggle someone into the U.S. and assert they lack the power to return anyone to the United States. The speaker states they are not going to do it.