reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In the video, the speaker describes a disturbing scene in a house. They enter and find a woman lying on her stomach. However, upon turning her over, they discover that her stomach has been opened and the baby is still attached to the mother with the umbilical cord, but has been stabbed.

Pregnant women being cut open. The events are disturbing. This is not a show, it's real life.

The speaker opens by reframing Jesus’s presence in today’s terms: “If Jesus were here today, he would be a clinic escort distracting women from the hatred of the protesters or an abortion doula holding women's hands and offering support and love as they end their pregnancies.” They anticipate Jesus would have “a stern word for self righteous legislators who use abortion as a political issue rather than showing compassion for the people seeking abortions.” On this Row Sunday, the speaker aims to share some collected stories, describing them as “the sacred stories of women's lives.” They note that if Jesus were giving a sermon today, he might also have said, “blessed are those who end pregnancies, for they will be known for their loving kindness.” The speaker continues with a personal testimony: they have been pregnant four times, “I have had two abortions, and I have two amazing children.” They describe each reproductive decision—to have children and not to have children—as sacred because “they reflect the moral responsibility of reproductive power that is part of our inheritance as human creatures.” They remind the audience that each person has a reproductive story, and they point out a statistic: “one quarter of American women will have an abortion by the age of 45,” suggesting that some audience members’ reproductive journeys may also include abortion. They reiterate, “Blessed are those who end pregnancies for they will be known for their loving kindness.” The speaker then calls for a reimagining of theological understanding surrounding abortion, arguing it is essential “to addressing the violence that is being done to people across the country in the name of Christianity.” They frame the current climate as marked by “rampant reproductive injustice in our society,” and pose the question: “what does God require of us?” They close with “Amen. Amen.”

The speaker expresses gratitude and acknowledges their wife. They interact with someone in the audience and then proceed to talk about their mother. There is a brief interruption to adjust the camera. The speaker mentions a lollipop and continues speaking to someone off-camera. They ask a child their age and mention the challenges they face. The speaker shares a preference for children over adults and asks if anyone knows what their father used to say.

Speaker 0 reports that hundreds of women across the US and UK are banding together to sue Pfizer over the Depo Provera birth control injection, alleging a link to brain tumor development. The lawsuits reference a French study from the previous year showing that women who received the birth control injection and used Depo Provera for more than a year were five times more likely to develop a meningioma, a specific type of brain tumor. The study is said to be robust, noting that eighteen thousand women in the study between 2009 and 2018 underwent brain surgery specifically for meningioma. The speaker emphasizes the scope of Depo Provera’s use, stating that more than forty million women have already used the injectable birth control. A 2021 publication in the Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care is cited, reporting that over forty-two million women were using injectable birth controls like Depo Provera. In the United States, this represents about twenty-five percent, or one quarter, of all sexually active women. The discussion places the current litigation in the context of earlier legal actions concerning hormonal birth control. The speaker notes that this is not the first class-action lawsuit about birth control companies not adequately warning users about potential health impacts. A 2014 settlement is recalled, where a pharmaceutical company agreed to a global settlement of $100,000,000 over NuvaRing-related issues, specifically blood clotting problems leading to deep vein thrombosis, stroke, or death. The speaker then shifts attention to other birth control options, pointing to Nexplanon, an implant placed in the arm, and remarks that videos or attention around Nexplanon suggest that a similar class action could be anticipated in the future. The overall sentiment conveyed is that there is growing public concern and scrutiny of hormonal birth control products and their health risks. Finally, the speaker notes that mainstream media and companies are questioning why women are quitting birth control, implying a broader trend of declining use in response to safety concerns and lawsuits.

Luna, a transgender nationally registered advanced EMT in New Mexico, estimates they have responded to 1,500 calls and treated too many transgender people to count. A second speaker poses a hypothetical scenario: if a biological male with a penis experiencing a medical emergency claimed to be having a miscarriage, would the EMT check for a miscarriage or consider it a possibility? The speaker's answer is no.

This transcript centers on Erica Kirk’s family, focusing on her mother Loretta Fransby, who is also referred to as Mama Lowe. The speakers discuss her family and the public interest around Erica Kirk’s pregnancy. The conversation includes a claim that there has been a lot of talk about whether the woman in question has truly ever been pregnant, with one speaker asserting, “I’ve been pregnant five times. The first was a miscarriage, gave birth to four, so you bet your ass I zoomed in on that ultrasound screen.” The speaker notes a close-up of the ultrasound image and reveals that they conducted a deep dive into the stages of pregnancy, even though they had limited technology to zoom in on the original image. The speaker explains that based on the stomach size and what is visible, it would be safe to presume the ultrasound shown is a viability ultrasound, which determines if there is a heartbeat and can be performed as early as six weeks. They describe what a six-week ultrasound looks like versus an eight-week ultrasound, and mention that they wanted to compare those visuals to Erica Kirk’s ultrasound but could not zoom in on the provided image due to a lack of technology, describing the effort as a two-hour waste. The speaker adds that they learned at nine weeks babies hiccup—though hiccups do not produce sound. The discussion also touches on the significance of ultrasound appointments, noting that they are a big deal. They point out that Charlie is not seen in the video, though he could be behind the camera, and that the original audio was dubbed over, making it unclear whether there was any interaction. The speakers compare the situation to scenes often depicted in romantic comedies, where a partner’s absence from doctor appointments is a source of tension. The closing remark imagines Erica becoming angry if her partner, Charlie, misses an appointment, emphasizing “Those eyes!” as a reaction. In sum, the transcript covers: the family context around Erica Kirk and Loretta Fransby, public speculation about Erica’s pregnancy, a self-claimed deep dive into ultrasound timelines (six to nine weeks, including the fact that nine weeks can involve hiccups), the importance of ultrasound appointments, and the mystery surrounding Charlie’s presence in the video.

Speaker 0 expresses a fear that we are on the cusp of not being able to fall pregnant naturally, describing it as absolutely terrifying and noting that there has been something extra in the last couple of years contributing to this trend. Speaker 1 adds that probably everyone knows somebody now who has had difficulty conceiving, underscoring the pervasiveness of infertility concerns in society. Speaker 2 makes a striking claim about male physiology, stating that “The average 21 year old man has a testosterone level that's lower than what a World War two veteran would have in his sixties.” This line is presented as a factual observation within the discussion. Speaker 1 attributes the broader infertility and health decline to “an explosion of chronic diseases.” The speaker suggests that one can only assume there’s “a brilliant business model involved in making people sick and driving them to their doctors and putting them on medications for life.” The assertion continues that all these things are having a negative impact, and that there isn’t more done about it. The speaker advocates for simpler and natural methods that people can be trained in, implying that these approaches could address fertility and health issues more effectively than current systems. Speaker 0 then contends that if alternative methods to fall pregnant are offered, such as IVF, there is a lot of profit to be made with that, indicating a belief that IVF represents a lucrative avenue within the fertility industry. Speaker 1 concludes by proposing that the discussion “has to start with question everything,” encouraging a mindset of inquiry about conventional explanations, treatments, and the broader system. Overall, the conversation centers on concern about rising infertility and declining male testosterone, the idea that chronic diseases and a perceived profit-driven medical-industrial complex contribute to these problems, the suggestion of pursuing simpler and natural methods as alternatives to conventional treatments like IVF, and a closing call to adopt a mindset of questioning established narratives.

The speaker presents a list of companies that allegedly use aborted fetuses in their products, claiming it as the real reason for the abortion ban. They express disgust and emphasize that the information is verified by the companies themselves, providing a website with sources. The speaker urges viewers to throw away any products from these companies immediately. The list includes baby food and pet food, with sources available on the companies' websites.

One speaker suggests killing unwanted children in foster care. They ask for statistics on the percentage of foster children who are abused, molested, or enslaved. Another speaker says they would be okay with killing babies in foster care and killing children who have been abused. One speaker states that if they don't want to have a baby, they should have the choice not to, because people should still have the choice, and that the other speaker doesn't understand the magnitude of having a child.

Speaker 0 opens by saying having kids is an important decision. Speaker 1 notes they’re waiting for the right time and that rushing is not an option, then abruptly says, “Oh, shit. I’m pregnant again,” lamenting having too many kids. Speaker 0 questions if Speaker 1 was on the pill, to which Speaker 1 responds “Hell no.” They speculate about Britney and dismiss the idea of having a child now, given the current market, agreeing that it wouldn’t make sense. Speaker 0 suggests coming over, then uses a hostile term, and Speaker 1 criticizes someone’s indifference toward them. Speaker 0 asserts there must be something “he” likes over there, and Speaker 1 dismisses the notion, asking if it means nothing to them. An exclamation, “Oh, shit. It wasn’t me. It wasn’t me,” follows, and then Speaker 1 asks, “Baby?” as they note they finally decided to have children, while they acknowledge not pointing fingers but that it’s not going well. The conversation shifts to fertility and assisted reproduction. Speaker 0 questions whether in vitro would be appropriate, while Speaker 1 counters that it should always be them. They discuss not being responsible for sperm count, with Speaker 0 proclaiming, “Yeah. I’m gonna fuck all of you. That’s my boy.” The dialogue then shifts to a dramatic line about Clevon: he was lucky to be alive after attempting to jump a jet ski from a lake into a swimming pool and impaling his crotch on an iron gate. Thanks to advances in stem cell research and the work of Drs. Krinsky and Alt Schuler, Clevon is expected to regain full reproductive function. Speaker 0 replies with “Unfortunately.” Speaker 1 reports that Trevor died of a heart attack while masturbating to produce sperm for artificial insemination, but notes she has some eggs frozen, so as soon as the right guy comes along, there will be a use for them. The narrative then states that this pattern continued for generations, though few, if any, seemed to notice.

The speaker shares a poignant story about their mother's miscarriage when they were a teenager. They drove their mother to the hospital and were surprised to see the remains of the fetus in a jar. This experience was never discussed publicly until the mother gave permission for it to be included in the speaker's book. The speaker emphasizes that they included the story in the book to highlight their relationship with their mother. Through this experience, the speaker learned that their mother trusted them and they gained a boost in confidence. They also discovered that their mother is a straightforward person.

Pregnant women undergo disturbing experiences that are not fictional entertainment. This is not a show on Netflix or cable news. It is the harsh reality of life.

Many women today want to be wives not because they want to commit to a man, but rather to show off to their friends and uphold a false sense of morality. They claim they want to be married before having kids, yet they have been with numerous partners. It's as if they believe they can erase their past mistakes. It's important to be cautious in relationships.

The speaker discusses her miscarriage, which occurred two to four hours after an ultrasound at five and a half to six weeks of pregnancy. An RN told her she was the sixth person recently to miscarry after an ultrasound. Research led her to a study where pregnant women received two or more ultrasound scans. One study divided over 9,000 women into two groups. The first group received an ultrasound scan between sixteen and twenty weeks, and the second group received no ultrasound scan. The results showed 20 miscarriages in the first ultrasound group and none in the second group. She believes ultrasounds are not worth the risk, and that many times, if a scan sees something wrong, babies are born completely normal anyway. She advises being patient and trusting baby movement. She encourages viewers to consider not getting ultrasounds or using Dopplers, and to check out the links she listed below.

In this video, the speaker asks how to differentiate between boys and girls. They mention that boys have short hair, but what if both individuals have short hair? The speaker suggests another way to determine gender is by removing their clothes. They also mention being asked explicit and sexual questions that made them uncomfortable, comparing it to how they would feel talking that way to their own child.

This video features a discussion about a baby girl with lacerations on the back of her skull. The speaker mentions that the skull is broken and wonders if it moves when the baby comes out. They explain that the umbilical cord is severed first and they wait for it to stop pulsing before the fetus expires. The speaker mentions that legally they would be obligated to help the baby survive, but it probably wouldn't. They also mention that if the pregnancy were to progress naturally before the termination procedure, they would not provide assistance.

The transcript follows a pregnant woman’s intense emotional crisis and complicated pregnancy, interspersed with a separate account from a mother about a missing child. - The pregnant woman, identified as Speaker 0, contemplates the due date and the prospect of abortion. She fears November 9 might force a stressful decision, and she tells Speaker 1 that she cannot promise she won’t hurt herself, expressing suicidal thoughts and describing that suicide would bring her peace of mind. She cannot predict how she would behave if told her baby is due sooner or later, and she repeatedly says she would like to get rid of the baby, seeing the child as giving her nothing and feeling disconnected from it. - Speaker 2 mentions the need for a good ultrasound (USG) test result to clarify the due date, suggesting possibilities like the twentieth, twenty-seventh, November third, or November 5. The hope is that a clear result will ease the situation. - The conversation reveals escalating suicidal thoughts, including contemplation of specific methods and a “suicide package” offered by a friend ofSpeaker 0 who knows how to obtain substances. The package costs 380 zilates. The assistant asks if she will kill herself and the child because she cannot wait twelve days, prompting Speaker 0 to reaffirm the urgent need for the ultrasound result and the associated stress. - Speaker 0 describes the pregnancy as producing neither joy nor maternal connection; she explicitly states she does not identify with the fetus, does not talk to it, and does not want it. She describes daily life as painful and says she would like to end the pregnancy. She distinguishes between the baby’s reality and her own mental state, reporting that the baby’s presence has provided nothing to her emotionally. - Marcelina’s birth becomes a turning point. The baby is born by C-section after a hospital stay, with the baby described as a girl weighing about three kilograms and healthy, scoring 10 points on assessment. The mother reports that the baby’s test results were good, and that her mental state is improving, though she remains stressed about the surgery itself. She had not seen the baby during delivery due to the hospital setup and the emotional intensity, and she shares that the atmosphere was tense and nerve-wracking. - Post-delivery, Speaker 0 describes being in significant pain and on medications, including hydroxyzine, and recalls distress from the prior night. While she dreams of the baby, she feels emotionally detached and uncertain about whether she can handle contacting the child in the recovery room. She expresses a desire to leave the hospital soon to avoid further distress and contemplates whether she would want to have more children in the future, acknowledging a sense of underdeveloped maternal instinct. - The narrative then shifts to a separate account (Speaker 2) of a missing child, Tomok, told by a mother who describes the day her child was abducted, her ongoing search, and her determination. She recounts searching outdoors, praying for punishment to be directed at herself rather than her child, and vows to fend for her child, insisting that a child is a living being and not a consumable object. Thirty years later, she remains convinced her son is alive. - The overall arc combines pregnancy distress, considerations of abortion and self-harm, a difficult but ultimately successful birth, and a parallel testimony of enduring desperation and perseverance in the face of a long-term missing-child tragedy.

The speaker considered deleting their account due to a barrage of transphobic messages, which they were unprepared for, especially given their initial expectation of low viewership. Ultimately, they decided against it. They stated they will not allow negativity to undermine their accomplishments and years of hard work, nor let others control their life. They believe they are superior to those sending hateful messages.

Pregnant women undergo disturbing experiences that are beyond what you would see on a TV show. This is not fiction, but the harsh reality of life.