reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
" Cancer? Cancer, you know, we're we're seeing certain cases here and there." "for those three cases, you know, there was success. You know, I know two of the patients." "it's not for everybody." "why is it again that some patients are improving with high dosages of mebendazole, ivermectin, etcetera, and some patients are not?" "we did fecal transplant using her grandson, and we extended her life. She improved her appetite." "She improved her hemoglobin, but it wasn't continuous." "we've shown that loss of bifidobacteria is a problem in invasive cancer." "I think there's gonna be in a future where we're gonna have, every cancer is gonna have a microbe attached to it." "Think about HPV cervical cancer, H. Pylori, gastric cancer, Burkitt's lymphoma, Epstein Barr virus." "there's gonna be a link to a cancer and a microbe that's lacking that needs to be repopulated." "in other words, is it over is the tumor growing because of a microbe that's in there that’s allowing it to grow?" "suppression of that microbe would be first to to kill off the tumor." "the methods that we have right now at killing the tumor is we kill off everything. Kind of like what we do with hydroxychloroquine." "We kill off the virus, but then we kill the whole microbiome." "that's not necessarily a solution because the problem is, well, you've killed the virus this time, but then what happens now you've killed your microbiome and your bifidobacteria, and now you're gonna get another virus and another virus." "Knowing what I know today, which is once you kill your microbiome, it takes years to recover."

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
I found over 100 scientific papers showing Ivermectin's potential against cancer, primarily from preclinical studies. Researchers are puzzled by how this anti-parasitic drug, which has been effective for decades, can also treat cancer. Ivermectin is off patent, meaning there's little financial incentive for big pharma to invest in its research. Notably, Ivermectin can kill cancer stem cells, reverse chemotherapy resistance, and enhance the effectiveness of both chemotherapy and radiation. Patients combining Ivermectin with these treatments have shown remarkable results, including significant tumor reductions. After two years of research, I now treat over 1,000 cancer patients with Ivermectin and other anti-parasitic drugs. The recent mention by Mel Gibson about friends curing stage 4 cancer with these treatments highlights the growing awareness of this approach.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that publications like The Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine, and JAMA are corrupt and will no longer be used by NIH scientists. They claim these journals have become vessels for pharmaceutical propaganda, alleging that pharmaceutical companies control the journals and that publishing requires a $10,000 payment. The speaker references past heads of these journals, who they claim have admitted the journals prioritize promoting pharmaceutical products over scientific integrity. As a result, the speaker states they will stop NIH scientists from publishing in these journals. Instead, they plan to create new journals within each institute that will become preeminent.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, a gastroenterologist, discusses research on the microbiome's role in COVID-19 and challenges faced publishing findings that went against the public health narrative. Early research documented the virus in stools for up to 45 days and showed hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin killed COVID-19 in stools, but also harmed the microbiome, necessitating vitamin C, D, and zinc. The FDA initially granted an exemption for clinical trials using this combination, then revoked it. Media-fueled fear around hydroxychloroquine hindered recruitment. Research revealed that severe COVID-19 patients lacked bifidobacteria, a key microbe for immunity, which is abundant in newborns but declines with age. Vitamin C and ivermectin were found to increase bifidobacteria. A hypothesis that ivermectin increased bifidobacteria was retracted after being widely read. Research on mRNA vaccines showed they killed bifidobacteria, presented at a gastroenterology conference, linking bifidobacteria loss to Crohn's disease, Lyme disease, and invasive cancer. The speaker concludes that research interference during the pandemic hindered scientific progress and that clinical trial guidelines were not followed.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses an ivermectin study showing ivermectin increased bifidobacteria before and after, noting it rose with ivermectin but didn't last: "Goes up, goes back down." He questions whether this yo-yo effect explains cancer patients' lack of improvement and whether timing matters. When someone reports a patient improved kidney cancer with ivermectin, mebendazole, he asks to see the microbiome before and after, blood work, and markers to understand why some survive while others don't. He praises courageous physicians who push the art of medicine to save lives, citing a seven-year-old with a brain tumor who was headed to hospice; he urges trying everything with informed consent. He concludes: "I don't know. This is research. I don't know, but I'm willing to try. These are the risks. Your kid may die on my protocol." He emphasizes weighing the risk-benefit ratio.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker discusses anecdotal findings on bifidobacteria from vitamin C and ivermectin, and the publish‑or‑perish obstacle in research. "I took a lot of vitamin c at the beginning of the pandemic. Grams a day." "I do not recommend it to anybody." He did it as a guinea pig, and notes that vitamin C "increases bifidobacteria." He then tested about 20 patients to see what happened. "Ivermectin increases bifidobacteria," but publication was blocked by research interference, making long-term effects unclear—"could there be kidney problems? Could there be liver problems?" He laments that you cannot advance research if you don't publish, because publication validates work. When he published "the lost microbes of COVID," labs, Japan, China, and Italy, reproduced the data, confirming replication. "If that paper is real, it gets reproduced into three, four, five papers." He emphasizes colonization as the essence of the work and notes cross‑population questions about who it helps.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Parasites and cancer have been overlooked, with numerous studies on Ivermectin and cancer conducted by the NIH. Videos from doctors worldwide show that cancer cells resemble parasite egg sacks under a microscope. A chiropractor named Brian Artis discussed this with a parasitologist friend, who revealed that oncologists rarely make the connection between cancer and parasites, despite it being a common topic in parasitology circles. The reason for this silence is likely the fear of losing funding.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker observed that patients with severe COVID were missing bifidobacteria compared to those highly exposed but uninfected. Bifidobacteria is a key microbe for immunity and is present in newborns but absent in older people. The speaker's research indicated vitamin C increases bifidobacteria, which may explain its use for treating colds. Ivermectin also increased bifidobacteria within 24 hours, possibly because it's a fermented product of a similar bacteria. The speaker hypothesized that ivermectin's observed benefits in COVID patients might be due to increased bifidobacteria. This hypothesis was the most read during the pandemic but was later retracted. The speaker believes the retraction of a hypothesis is not in the spirit of science.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, a gastroenterologist, discusses their research on the microbiome and COVID-19. They found that the virus lingers in stools, hydroxychloroquine kills the virus but harms the microbiome, and bifidobacteria is crucial for immunity. Their studies on vitamin C, ivermectin, and mRNA vaccines' effects on bifidobacteria faced challenges in publication due to going against the mainstream narrative. They highlight the importance of unbiased research and collaboration in finding solutions. The speaker also raises concerns about pharmaceutical companies prioritizing profits over patient safety during the pandemic.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a growing concern about the connection between parasites and cancer, which has been largely ignored. The NIH has conducted numerous studies on Ivermectin and its potential in treating cancer. Doctors worldwide are now sharing videos that show the similarities between cancer cells and parasite egg sacs under a microscope. A chiropractor named Brian Artis discussed this with a 40-year Egyptian endologist, who was surprised that oncologists had never made this association. It seems that cytologists often discuss the link between cancer and parasites, but oncologists remain silent, possibly due to fear of losing funding.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
A veteran physician, Dr. Karen Ruthman, was found dead after allegedly discovering a link between parasites and cancer and a suppressed cure: ivermectin. Dr. Ruthman observed that many patients with chronic illnesses and cancers had parasites. Her research indicated parasites trigger cancer, and ivermectin could treat it. Threatened after planning to reveal her findings, she died in a house fire deemed a "freak accident," though some suspect a cover-up. Experts claim the NIH is aware of the parasite-cancer connection, with studies on ivermectin and cancer. Some researchers claim cancer tumors resemble parasite egg sacs. Big Pharma profits from chronic disease and suppresses cures. Ivermectin, smeared during the COVID-19 pandemic, is a safe, Nobel Prize-winning drug that threatens their profits. Pfizer invested heavily in cancer treatments as mRNA vaccines, potentially linked to "turbo cancers," were rolled out. Experts suggest cancer is linked to parasites, mold, toxic metals, and viruses. The media allegedly altered footage to discredit ivermectin. Federal law prohibits emergency use authorization for vaccines if an existing effective treatment exists, so ivermectin had to be discredited to protect the vaccine enterprise. The World Economic Forum has warned of new injectables for various ailments, including cancers potentially caused by mRNA injections.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
I discovered that patients with severe COVID lacked a key bacteria, bifidobacteria, which is crucial for immunity. Newborns have this bacteria, while the elderly do not due to aging. Vitamin C and Ivermectin were found to increase bifidobacteria levels. I published a hypothesis linking Ivermectin to bifidobacteria increase, which gained attention but was retracted. Hypotheses are essential in science.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The probiotic industry understands the loss of bifidobacterium in cancer and aging populations, but cannot claim probiotics improve longevity due to FDA regulations requiring clinical trials. Doctors also face scrutiny for promoting products without sufficient data. The speaker conducts clinical trials, involving the FDA when bringing products to market, such as ivermectin, doxycycline, and zinc for COVID. Data showed no deaths during treatment, suggesting its effectiveness. Despite a product's market approval with a 20% success rate, the speaker emphasizes the need to address the remaining 80% of patients. Innovation and discussion among doctors are crucial, but social media is now essential for educating doctors and the public due to the high cost of publishing data.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 explains that people wonder why ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were suppressed, noting these are well established drugs with safety profiles and billions of doses given. He says ivermectin is a human drug and also works on horses, but it would win the Nobel Prize because it works so well on human beings. Speaker 1 responds “Mhmm.” Speaker 0 states there is a little known federal law that says you cannot give an emergency use authorization (EUA) to a vaccine if there is any medication approved for any purpose that is shown effective against the target disease. So if Tony Fauci or anybody had admitted that hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin are effective against COVID, it would have been illegal to give the EUAs to the vaccines, and they could never have gotten them approved. He suggests this would have collapsed a “200,000,000,000 enterprise.” Speaker 1 says, “That is fascinating,” noting they had been covering this for two years and that this is the first time hearing that; if the medical community had been saying ivermectin works, it would have affected EUA. Speaker 0 responds that the medical community did say that—17,000 doctors signed a petition, and there are many peer reviewed publications consistently saying so. Yet Fauci aggressively crusaded against it, insisting it’s a horse medication, that people are overdosing, and so on. He asks why Fauci kept saying it. Speaker 1 asks why Fauci continued to say it after he got the authorization. Speaker 0 offers possible explanations: one, even if you have an EUA, the law appears to say you can't have it anymore if there is a functioning medication. He acknowledges, though, that he cannot read Fauci’s mind but speculates there is a strong incentive for Fauci to kill ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. He cites several doctors who treated tens of thousands of COVID patients successfully and who argue that half a million Americans did not need to die, naming Harvey Reich at Yale, Peter McCulloch, and Peter Quarry.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
In December 2020, the speaker began collecting stool samples from colleagues before and after their COVID vaccination to study the vaccine's impact on the microbiome. The speaker discovered that mRNA vaccines killed bifidobacteria but believed these findings were unpublishable due to the prevailing narrative. The speaker presented this research as an abstract at the American College of Gastroenterology in October 2022, where it won a research award, beating 6,000 other abstracts. This abstract drew the attention of 18,000 GI doctors, who began to consider that the loss of bifidobacteria may explain why they contracted COVID after vaccination. Further research indicated persistent damage to bifidobacteria from the vaccine. The speaker's presentation also linked the loss of bifidobacteria to Crohn's disease, Lyme disease, and invasive cancer.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker claims ivermectin is part of a diabolical Rockefeller plan devised in 2010, predicting people would reject vaccines after 2020 and turn to another pharmaceutical. They question ivermectin’s safety by listing side effects such as blindness, liver failure, and infertility. They argue the Rockefellers own the entire medical system worldwide, so buying from a different country is ineffective. The discussion notes ads for pharmaceuticals on alternative-health platforms, suggesting a marketing push. They say parasites are really heavy metals in the body, and that ivermectin contains heavy metals. The claim is that ivermectin, like antibiotics, suppresses symptoms. They describe a $32,000,000,000 industry fueled by this narrative, and when they researched producers, they found Merck, Johnson and Johnson, Pfizer, and Bayer. The same companies making vaccines in 2020 allegedly also make ivermectin, framing it as a bait-and-switch.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Ivermectin, a Nobel Prize-winning anti-parasitic drug, has been vilified. Merck, who held the patent until 1996, claims it doesn't work for COVID-19. However, Merck has a 50/50 partnership with Moderna on mRNA cancer vaccines. Because Merck will make billions on mRNA cancer vaccines, they have no interest in investigating ivermectin for cancer. There is evidence that high-dose ivermectin is effective in treating many types of cancers.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Sabine Hazen and her panel critique a hydroxychloroquine paper, calling it a fake paper with fake data: "This is a fake paper. This is a fake data." They cite claims of "seventeen thousand people died" and "96,000 patients" in the Lancet as fraudulent, arguing no way "70,000 medical records" could be used. Xavier Ezolber analyzes data miscalculation, "data inconsistency" and "fabricated" results, criticizing the peer-review process and predatory journals that "launder scientific papers." He says, "There is a corruption in medicine," "money talks for sure," and "lobbyists control both sides of the politics." They recount frontline experiences with hydroxychloroquine–Z Pak–vitamins and ivermectin–doxycycline protocols, reporting "zero mortality, zero hospitalizations" in some cohorts and highlighting the microbiome’s role. They urge transparency, critique drug trial processes, and question vaccine strategies, stressing early outpatient treatment research.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Big Pharma, they own everything. There's a number of past chief editors of journals, and we're not talking just, you know, like some throwaway journals. We're talking New England Journal of Medicine, Lancet, British Medical Journal. Okay. Some of the biggest journals in the world. Those are top three out of the top four that I just named. Journal of American Medical Association is the other one. But chief editors in the last twenty years, at least six of them have come out and said that at least 50% of the science that's published is fake. Come on. Read their quotes. Marcia Angel is one of them that I can remember her name. There's a guy by the name of Richard something or other from the British Medical Journal who said the same thing. I just read an article about it the other day. I'll I'll send it to you because it's I'm not surprised. I mean, depth of corruption is is stunning and and the fact that pretty much nothing's been done about it makes you wonder how long this can all last.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
panel discusses hydroxychloroquine and early treatments. Hazen states: "I did the clinical trial. I wrote those protocols on hydroxychloroquine, Z Pak, vitamin C, D and zinc, passed them through the FDA within twenty four hours." She adds, "No one died on my shift, even though I did a placebo controlled trial on hydroxychloroquine, Z Pak, vitamin C, D and zinc," and "And we had hundreds of patients on that." They argue the Lancet paper is invalid: "This paper is to me is not just, you know, I'm not going to criticize it and say, oh, well they overdosed. I'm going to say, no, this is a fake paper. This is a fake data." They insist: "There is no way that four or five authors took 17,000 records." They discuss predatory journals: "predatory journals" and "they can manipulate or retract the data to make you look bad." They claim: "Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are out of patents." They report outcomes: "zero mortality" and "zero hospitalizations," and critique media: "they control the media and they push all this narrative out there." They urge: "stop publishing papers that are so fraudulently, so obviously fraudulent." They reference the microbiome: "the microbiome is all shit," and advocate: "everybody needs a fecal transplant right now."

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 notes that ivermectin has broken through to the public sphere beyond COVID and is now discussed for many diseases. Speaker 0 asks where ivermectin stands in the scientific and medical community today and what other use cases exist for the medicine. Speaker 1 responds that thousands of doctors follow their data; 18,000 GI doctors see their data when they publish or present at the American College of Gastroenterology. Word-of-mouth in the medical community is a major form of marketing, with one doctor speaking to another. Referencing the COVID era, Speaker 1 mentions corruption and retractions, then describes ivermectin as having created a healthcare revolution where doctors have lined up to work to see other benefits of ivermectin without needing to ask permission to treat patients. A whole branch of healthcare is moving away from the same institute that Speaker 1 helped create drugs to market with his sisters. He says a group of doctors who had sponsored or helped pharma are turning away from pharma and exploring other methods to treat patients. He states his job is to unite doctors to see the truth, while bringing pharma back to being righteous and stopping data manipulation and scientist censorship. Speaker 1 references his book, Let’s Talk SH.T, acknowledging he could be wrong and challenging others to prove him wrong and reproduce the data to retract the hypothesis or paper. He emphasizes that the scientific process should be followed, especially when everything was done by the book and as well as he could. He adds that the research was not funded by others; it was funded by his savings. He created the microbiome research foundation with the goal of raising money to study kids with autism and to push an IND to the FDA, which cost about $600,000 to obtain FDA approval. He clarifies that no external party paid for this work, and he continues to struggle to raise funds to treat poor autistic kids who cannot afford expensive stool testing, drugs, and vitamins; they need help and everyone should step in to assist these kids. Speaker 1 concludes that their focus is fixing autism, with the aim of later addressing Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, and cancer.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, a gastroenterologist, discusses research on the microbiome's role in COVID-19 and challenges encountered publishing findings that contradicted the public health narrative. Early research identified the full viral sequence in stool samples, where it lingered for up to 45 days, and noted hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin killed the virus in stools but harmed the microbiome, leading to the addition of vitamins C, D, and zinc to treatment protocols. An initial FDA exemption for clinical trials using this combination was revoked, and media-fueled fear around hydroxychloroquine hindered recruitment. Research revealed that patients with severe COVID-19 lacked bifidobacteria, a key microbe for immunity, which is abundant in newborns but decreases with age. Vitamin C and ivermectin were found to increase bifidobacteria levels. A hypothesis that ivermectin increased bifidobacteria was retracted after being widely read. Research on mRNA vaccines showed they killed bifidobacteria, a finding presented at a gastroenterology conference and linked to conditions like Crohn's disease, Lyme disease, and invasive cancer. The speaker concludes that interference with research during the pandemic hindered scientific progress and that established clinical trial guidelines were not followed.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
I mean, it's become a joke. These papers that are winning awards at the American College of Gastro, and they're not getting published. So and what I do is I do what I do best, which is basically stir up shit, and I call all my friends. And I go, by the way, my paper has been retracted. That paper of the finding COVID in the stools Yeah. Was considered to be retracted. So, I called Trial Site News, and I said, by the way, you may wanna investigate. That's how they found out about the publishing house, private publishing house that is retracting these papers. So somebody must be paying them. And then I called all my colleagues, Mayo Clinic, Harvard, Yale, and I go, by the way, remember that paper that I found COVID? Well, it got retracted. And they're like, what? But it it passed peer review. Well, your peer review means nothing. And here's the thing. So guess what? You're not getting paid to do these peer reviews. Maybe you should start charging the journals now because clearly, they're going about wasting your time reviewing a paper, and they're going behind your back to retract the paper because it doesn't fit the narrative. So, that's what I do. So, and then the other thing that I did is I called the National Institute of Standards, Scott Jackson. And I basically said, remember my paper that we found COVID in the stools, and you also found COVID in the septic tanks? Well, my paper was retracted. And, you know, they couldn't believe it. They could this is at the government level. People are waking up to see we have a problem. Yeah. This is like the burning of the books.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
But I think there's you know, what's beautiful now because so many doctors are stepping up and seeing something and talking about something, I'm not saying that's the right thing. 'Is ivermectin improving cancer? Certainly some doctors have seen it.' 'So is that the way we is it improving for everybody? What is it in ivermectin that improves the microbiome of certain people and not in others? What is it in ivermectin that helps certain cancers and not others? Right? So we really need to be better to say, okay, look, I'm courageous enough to add ivermectin to my protocol of the chemo or the bio or the immunotherapy that I'm giving or maybe I don't.' 'And maybe at least I look at the microbiome. I look at the microbiome on what is believed right now, you know, a a good look at it.'

Keeping It Real

Dr. Hazan on Ivermectin, COVID, and MRNA Vaccines.
Guests: Sabine Hazan
reSee.it Podcast Summary
In Keeping It Real, Jillian Michaels hosts Dr. Sabine Hazan, a gastroenterologist who has spent three decades in clinical trials and microbiome research. Hazan describes how her lab shifted focus during the pandemic to study the gut microbiome’s role in COVID-19, including attempts to detect the virus in stool and to understand how microbial balance might influence disease severity. She explains writing 57 research protocols and building standardized methods for sample collection and analysis, likening protocols to screenplays that guide experiments from stool collection to data interpretation. Hazan argues that the microbiome not only reflects health but can shape immune responses, potentially affecting asymptomatic cases and vulnerability to infection. Hazan recounts the suppression she perceives around certain treatments and findings, such as vitamin C and vitamin D protocols, hydroxychloroquine early in the crisis, and especially ivermectin. She describes censorship on social media and hesitation from institutions, arguing that political polarization interfered with scientific discourse and patient care. The discussion moves to her ivermectin work, including a personal clinical pivot from hydroxychloroquine to ivermectin and doxycycline, observations about how gut bacteria like Bifidobacteria relate to COVID outcomes, and hypotheses about how the gut-lung axis might mediate inflammation and recovery. She details a controversial arc of hypothesis, retraction, and subsequent data, contending that journals and researchers are influenced by broader forces, while insisting that listening to patients and pursuing open inquiry are essential to medical progress. The conversation then broadens to vaccines, adverse events, and the idea that mRNA technologies require careful, independent scrutiny. Hazan discusses observing changes in patients’ microbiomes after vaccination, concerns about persistent effects on beneficial microbes, and the need for transparent reporting of adverse events. She advocates for independent, nonprofit scientific work and emphasizes collaborative, global learning about the microbiome’s diversity. The episode closes with Hazan’s call for humility in medicine, a push for open dialogue, and a vision of a microbiome-informed future where different cultures’ microbial ecosystems enrich our understanding of health rather than divide it.
View Full Interactive Feed