TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Two teenage boys died in their sleep shortly after receiving their second COVID-19 vaccine. An epidemiologist claims that this adds to the evidence that Pfizer's vaccine can cause death in children. The report, published by the College of American Pathologists, investigated the cases of these two boys and supports the conclusion that the Pfizer vaccine led to their deaths. The CDC lists a warning for myocarditis on its website for both Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, but does not mention the possibility of death. The FDA warnings on these vaccines are considered valid and justified. No response has been received from the CDC regarding this matter.

I got the vaccine. Did you really? Yeah, even the fourth one. Were you pressured into it? Kind of. I went to the doctor for blood work, and we noticed some unusual particles. I asked what they were, and the doctor revealed they were related to the vaccine. I was shocked. This is why some people experience severe issues, like having numerous white blood clots in their blood.

A pilot shares his experience of having strokes after receiving the Pfizer vaccine. He had the second shot on November 7th and suffered two strokes on November 28th. He underwent surgery to drain the excess fluid in his head. When he asked the doctor if the vaccine could be the cause, he was told that the hospital would never admit it due to political reasons. The pilot advises against getting booster shots, as he believes they can ruin a free mind if one is lucky enough to survive.

The CDC is investigating potential links between the COVID vaccine and strokes in patients who have received the vaccine. There have been cases of people suffering from strokes after getting vaccinated.

Florida's surgeon general raised concerns about the safety of COVID vaccines, while the federal government continues to promote them. This video tells the story of Maddie, a child who participated in Pfizer's vaccine study. After receiving the second dose, Maddie experienced severe symptoms including chest pain, abdominal pain, and loss of feeling in her legs. Despite seeking medical help, her symptoms were dismissed as anxiety. Maddie's case was not properly reported, and the FDA granted emergency use of the vaccine for children based on this study. Other children also experienced serious adverse effects, including heart problems and death. Maddie was eventually diagnosed with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. The government and those involved in the study declined to comment. Maddie's parents are hopeful for her recovery but have lost trust in the medical system.

Speaker 0 states that the study confirms suspicions from the past five years that common sense has deteriorated in the population. The study analyzed the VAERS system from the 1990s to 2024 and examined PRRs (proportional reporting ratios), which measure how many more adverse events occur with the COVID shots compared to the flu shot or other vaccines. It reports 8686 safety signals of neuropsychiatric adverse events, with some up to 3,000 times higher than the flu shot. The safety signal threshold defined by CDC/FDA for PRRs is greater than two, and all reported signals exceeded this threshold. The listed conditions include schizophrenia, dementia, Alzheimer's, cognitive impairment, strokes, brain clots, homicidal tendencies, homicidal behavior, and psychosis, described as people hallucinating and brain damage. The speaker notes that this large number of safety signals aligns with a recent study indicating that people who had strokes showed toxic spike protein production in their brains for up to seventeen months after vaccination, which the speaker suggests explains the observed deterioration in cognitive function.

In the past, we did not see blood clotting like this before COVID-19 vaccinations. A marathon runner had severe issues walking after vaccination, requiring treatments like plasma freezes. Clot formations indicate ongoing damage to blood vessel linings, leading to clot formation. Multiple vaccinated individuals experience circulation problems in cold temperatures, with symptoms improving in warmer weather.

A 71-year-old woman with suspected stroke is brought to the emergency room at Saint-Joseph Saint-Luc Hospital. The speaker, potentially linking her condition to vaccination, discusses this with the nurse on duty. The nurse confirms that they have been seeing more cases of stroke within two weeks of vaccination, but nothing is being done about it. The nurse mentions that the majority of these patients die due to the severity of the strokes. The speaker expresses frustration and helplessness at witnessing fellow citizens being affected and potentially facing certain death. They apologize for the message but felt the need to share their observations.

My son, Sean Hartman, played hockey since he was 8 years old. After a year off due to COVID, he decided to go back to hockey and got his first Pfizer shot on August 25th. However, he had a bad reaction and went to the hospital on August 29th. Despite having a rash, brown circles around his eyes, and feeling unwell, he was sent home with only a prescription for Advil. Sadly, on September 27th, he was found dead by his mother. His autopsy came back as death unascertained, with only a slightly enlarged heart. However, a second pathologist, who wishes to remain anonymous, believes the vaccine caused his death. I question the safety of vaccines for kids in sports, especially with the Omicron variant.

Checklist for summary approach: - Identify the core topic: vaccine-induced immune thrombotic events leading to stroke in healthy people after 2021. - Capture sequence and timeline: old-stroke stereotype, new observations in healthy individuals, studies tracing patterns weeks after certain shots. - Explain mechanism as described: immune system overreacts, the protective spike sticks to vessel walls, causing ischemia. - Note terminology and sources: “vaccine induced immune thrombotic events,” rarity, and citations to Lancet and NEGM. - Identify proposed causes: genetics, guts, toxins, or a combination. - Emphasize the concluding point: misfiring immune response can lead to stroke; focus is on understanding why, not disputing occurrence. - Preserve original phrasing where it conveys key claims, while translating into a cohesive English summary. - Exclude evaluative or judgmental statements; present claims as stated. - Keep the final summary within 368-461 words. Summary: They said stroke only happened to the old, but hospitals started seeing something new. Healthy people suddenly clotting. Coincidence? Maybe. But after 2021, studies began tracing small patterns weeks after certain shots. Most never notice but for a few, the immune system hits too hard. The same spike that's meant to protect starts sticking to vessel walls. Breath thickens, flow slows. Boom. Ischaemia. Doctors call it vaccine induced immune thrombotic events. Rare. Yes. Imagine. No. It's in the Lancet and NEGM. The question isn't if it happens but why somebody's break the code. Genetics, guts, toxins, maybe all three. Because when the system builds to defend starts to misfire the result isn't protection, it's a stroke.

The data indicates that vaccinations have led to serious health issues, including blood clots, strokes, and amputations. A simple d-dimer test can reveal the presence of blood clots, yet the government has not mandated this test for vaccinated individuals. Studies by two cardiologists found that over 80% of vaccinated patients had elevated d-dimer levels, suggesting microemboli, which can cause gradual organ failure and increase the risk of severe thrombosis, particularly in the brain. Cases of thrombosis in young people are rising, likely due to microemboli and the spike protein from the vaccine affecting blood vessel walls. This connection has been established through clinical observations.

The CDC is investigating a potential link between COVID vaccines and strokes. They have noted cases of individuals who received the vaccine and subsequently experienced strokes.

Kelly Sue, a survivor of the vaccine, used to lead an active life but experienced cramping in her calf after her first shot. Concerned, she visited a vascular surgeon who performed an ultrasound on her legs. Weeks later, she had back-to-back strokes and continued to have more throughout the following months. Kelly Sue spent 31 days in the hospital, experiencing various complications such as blindness and difficulty speaking. Her neurologist initially attributed her condition to the vaccine, but discussions about it ceased when doctors started getting fired. Kelly Sue is frustrated that no one is investigating the cause of these adverse reactions. Recently, she experienced a sudden spike in blood pressure and is currently fighting for her life.

After receiving the vaccine, the speaker experienced multiple seizures daily, followed by paralysis. Their baby also started showing abnormal behaviors like head nodding, tongue protrusion, and hand flapping. The speaker stopped vaccinating their children and focused on detoxing. Although their baby has a speech delay, they believe she will improve. The speaker experienced brain fog, difficulty with basic tasks, vertigo, and exercise intolerance. They also had trouble reading and experienced visual disturbances. The seizures eventually became controlled with medication. The speaker attributes all of these symptoms to the Pfizer vaccine.

D-dimers are markers for thrombosis. When analyzing blood samples for suspected deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, the normal range should not exceed 500. However, there has been a significant increase in elevated d-dimers among vaccinated patients. Many patients have levels above 3000, leading to concerns about microthrombosis throughout the body. Despite further examinations, no embolism or thrombosis has been found. Fatigue is a common symptom among these patients. The risk is that these individuals may experience microthromboses, potentially leading to death in the future. This raises questions about the future health and insurability of those with high d-dimer levels. Investigations and studies should be conducted to understand these phenomena, including the occurrence of thrombosis in placentas during pregnancies.

The speaker observed vasculitis, or inflammation of the blood vessels, in the brain tissue of almost all cases examined post-vaccination. Lymphocytes aggregate around small vessels, indicating inflammation possibly triggered by an antigenic structure like spike protein. This was described as one of the most alarming findings. Individuals with this complication may experience transient defects like loss of speech, unconsciousness, or blindness, but the brain can compensate if there is no major inflammation or hemorrhage. The speaker clarified that the individuals did not die from the vasculitis itself. It's possible for vaccinated individuals to experience these symptoms without knowing the underlying cause. Changes in character have been reported in some vaccinated individuals, which may be related to this inflammation.

Unexplained deaths have become a significant issue in recent years, especially after doctors who reported adverse events had their licenses revoked in Canada. There are concerns about the increasing number of unexplained deaths, myocarditis cases, and the need for stroke units for children post-vaccination. Despite challenges, doctors continue to address these issues.

In spring 2021, our ER was busier than ever due to a sudden surge in patients falling ill after COVID vaccines were introduced. We observed a significant rise in stroke cases, blood clots, heart issues, and paralysis. This shift in patient conditions highlights the impact of the pandemic on healthcare systems and the need to understand the full scope of what medical professionals have been facing.

They said stroke only happened to the old, but hospitals started seeing something new. Healthy people suddenly clotting. Coincidence? Maybe. But after 2021, studies began tracing small patterns, inflammation, platelets, micro clots weeks after certain shots. Most never notice but for a few, the immune system hits too hard. The same spike that's meant to protect starts sticking to vessel walls. Breath thickens, flow slows, boom. Ischemia. Doctors call vaccine induced immune thrombotic events. Rare, yes, imagined, no. Its indolentacid and negem. The question isn't if it happens but why somebody's break the code. Genetics, guts, toxins, maybe all three. Because when the system builds to defend starts to misfire the result isn't protection, it's a stroke.

They classified the post-vaccine troubles into three categories: immediate effects like pain, swelling, and redness; symptoms resembling COVID-19; and post-COVID injection syndromes. The latter includes inflammatory and multisystemic syndromes with various complications such as cardiac, neurological, hematological, vascular, immune system, reproductive health, cancer, and congenital issues. It is important to consult a doctor if experiencing any of these symptoms.

The panel discusses replication (replicon) vaccines and their potential dangers, focusing on how they differ from conventional messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines and what new risks might emerge as this technology develops. Key points and concerns raised - Replicon vaccines concept and fundamental differences - Replicon vaccines use replication-capable genetic material, so the embedded genetic information not only makes antigen proteins but also multiplies inside the cell. They are described as having both constitutive function (the ability to make proteins) and, crucially, the capacity to replicate, which distinguishes them from traditional, non-replicating mRNA vaccines. - It is explained that replication introduces additional mutation and recombination opportunities, because the RNA genome is copied more than once, and the process can produce variants that differ from the original design. - Central dogma exceptions and viral biology - The speakers explain that while the central dogma (DNA → RNA → protein) generally governs biology, some viruses violate this, with RNA viruses that replicate via RNA-dependent replication and even some reverse-transcribing retroviruses that convert RNA to DNA and integrate into genomes. This context is used to frame why replicon vaccines could behave unpredictably. - Potential risks of replication and spread - A core concern is that the replicon approach might allow the vaccine genome to spread beyond the initial target cells, potentially reaching other cells and tissues, or even spreading to other people via exosomes or other means. Exosomes can transport DNA, RNA, and proteins between cells; thus, the replicon genome could in theory be disseminated. - The possibility of homologous or heterologous recombination between replicon genomes and wild-type viruses could yield new variants. The panel emphasizes the difficulty of controlling such recombination in a living system. - Specific material and design considerations - The use of viral components like spike protein genes in replicon vaccines raises concerns about how these proteins might mutate or recombine during replication, potentially altering antigen presentation or safety. - A concern is raised about the lack of repair mechanisms in RNA replication (as opposed to DNA replication), which could make error rates higher and lead to unpredictable changes. - The panel notes that current replicon vaccine designs (including those using alphavirus backbones) inherently carry high mutation and recombination risk, and that the replicating systems may encounter unpredictable evolutionary dynamics inside the human body. - Safety signals and clinical anecdotes - The speakers cite cases of adverse events temporally associated with vaccines, including vascular inflammation and thrombosis, stroke-like events, and myocarditis, to illustrate that immune responses to vaccines can be complex and occasionally severe. They emphasize that such observations do not establish causality, but argue they warrant careful scrutiny. - There are references to cases of acute vascular and neural complications following repeated vaccination, and to broader immune dysregulation phenomena, including IGG4-related disease and immune dysregulation syndromes that can involve multiple organs. - One example concerns a patient who developed sudden limb problems after the third dose, requiring surgery; another describes myocardial involvement after multiple doses and subsequent inflammatory sequelae. - DNA contamination and analytical findings - Kevin McKernan’s analysis of certain Japanese CoronaVac vaccines is cited: both DNA contamination and the presence of SV40 promoter elements were detected in some vaccine lots, with DNA amounts exceeding some regulatory benchmarks in at least one case. The concern is that DNA contamination, or the presence of promoter sequences, could influence integration or expression in unintended ways. - It is noted that vaccines using lipid nanoparticles can potentially deliver nucleic acids into cells; in the presence of exons or promoter sequences, there could be unintended cellular uptake and expression. - Implications for public health and policy - The panel underscores the need for caution, thorough investigation, and long-term observation of any replication-based vaccine platform before broad deployment. There is a call to evaluate risks, monitor long-term outcomes, and consider the possibility that replication-competent constructs could drive unforeseen evolutionary dynamics within hosts or communities. - There is contention about how information is communicated to the public, with particular emphasis on avoiding misinformation while ensuring that scientific uncertainties are transparently discussed. - Broader scientific context and forward-looking stance - The speakers discuss how the field’s approach to gene-based vaccines is evolving rapidly, and they stress that the compatibility of replicon systems with human biology is not yet fully understood. - They frame their discussion as not merely about current vaccines but about the trajectory of vaccine platforms: if replication-based or self-dispersing systems prove too risky or unpredictable, the prudent path might be to favor conventional, non-replicating strategies until safety, efficacy, and containment of unintended spread are more firmly established. Closing and takeaways - The session closes with emphasis on careful evaluation of replicon vaccines, awareness that viral genetics can behave differently in humans than in theory, and a call for continued discussion, independent verification, and transparent communication as the technology develops. - Throughout, speakers acknowledge the complexity of immune responses to vaccines, the potential for unexpected adverse events, and the importance of safeguarding public health while advancing vaccine science.

Physician and scientist Sudhir Advakti expresses concerns about the potential formation of blood clots after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. He explains that these clots can be dangerous, causing symptoms like headaches, nausea, vomiting, and paralysis. German doctors have discovered that clot formation is a common occurrence with all vaccines, indicating that getting vaccinated may trigger a potentially lethal reaction. Advakti strongly advises against getting the vaccine, especially for children who are unable to defend themselves. He believes that giving the vaccine to children is a criminal act.

A series of incidents involving young athletes collapsing and experiencing critical medical emergencies is causing concern. A 17-year-old high school football player died after receiving a COVID vaccine and developing blood clots in his brain. Another 16-year-old football player suffered a stroke and blood clot during practice and passed away. A 12-year-old basketball player collapsed during warm-ups and died shortly after. These incidents, along with others, have led to speculation about a potential link to COVID vaccines. However, it is important to note that COVID vaccines are now available for children aged 5 and older and are crucial in stopping the spread of the virus.

The speaker claims injections result in blood clots, stroke, heart attack, and lost limbs, and questions why the government hasn't ordered D-dimer tests for vaccinated individuals to assess blood clot risk. Two cardiology studies allegedly found over 80% of vaccinated patients had high D-dimer levels, indicating microemboli. Microemboli in the brain, heart, or kidneys can cause organ failure and increase susceptibility to disease, potentially leading to strokes. The speaker reports seeing more cases of thrombosis of the superior sagittal sinus and transverse sinus in the brain, particularly in young people. They attribute this to microemboli and embolism caused by the spike protein from the vaccine and a nanolipid carrier entering the blood vessel wall, which they claim has been proven.

Although I am not a doctor, I’m a nurse. On the front lines we knew what was happening. When we asked for ibuprofen, they said no. When we asked why we weren’t giving steroids, the answer was “we’re just following orders.” Following orders has led to the sheer number of deaths in these hospitals. I didn’t see a single patient die of COVID. I’ve seen a substantial number die of negligence and medical malfeasance. When I was on the front lines of New York, I became globally known as the nurse in the break room sobbing, saying they were murdering my patients. Pharmaceutical companies had gone into those hospitals and decided to practice on the minorities, the disadvantaged, the marginalized populations with no advocates, because the very agencies that should protect them were closed while we were sheltering in place. While I was there, pharmaceutical companies rolled out remdesivir onto a substantial number of patients, which we all saw was killing the patients. And now, it’s the FDA-approved drug that is continuing to kill patients in the United States. As nurses, we’ve collected a descriptive amount of information that you may not get from the doctors. Doctors do quantitative data; we do qualitative data with a humanistic, phenomenological approach in nursing research. We’ve collected data from patients across the country for which we’ve helped patients through the American Front Line Nurses and the advocacy network so nurses could advocate for these patients. This data pool shows that as these patients get remdesivir, they have a less than twenty-five percent chance of survival if they get more than two doses. Now they’re rolling it out on children as well and into nursing homes or skilled nursing facilities as early intervention, even though doctors Pierre Corre and Merrick have demonstrated that there are cost-effective medications out there, and we are going to see the amplification of death across the country. We haven’t even touched on vaccines, which our expert panels have described; I won’t touch on that since many are far superior to me. Two days ago I flew out my first 10-year-old with a heart attack and had to fight the ER doctor because he said, “ten-year-olds don’t have heart attacks.” I argued for thirty minutes to force his hand to get an EKG and found a STEMI; the 12-lead EKG lit up. He said it wasn’t possible, and I said, “was just vaccinated yesterday. It is very much possible.” People contact me and the nurse advocates at American Front Line Nurses to help advocate, because there’s victim shaming—“it’s anxiety,” “it’s this.” But if they acknowledge it as a vaccine injury, the physician, the corporation, the hospital, the clinic may not get reimbursed, so it’s labeled as anxiety, neuropathy, or Guillain–Barré syndrome, when it’s very realistically a vaccine injury. I’ve traveled to South America, India, and South Africa, working in hot zones, stopping the spread of the virus and doing early intervention. Nowhere in developing nations do I see these issues that we see here in the United States. I’m a very proud American citizen from a family of immigrants. Our level of health care has deteriorated to substandard third-world-nation health care. You are better off in South America in a field hospital than in level-one trauma designer hospitals in the United States. As nurses, we are getting reports across the country from American frontline nurses about patients not getting food, water, or basic care. How come a patient hasn’t been fed in nine days? Why do I need a court order to force a hospital to feed a person who isn’t intubated and who would like food? If they’re on a ventilator, they’re not given water or basic care. We’re not allowed to take a BiPAP mask off to help someone eat. I’ve had patients who haven’t been bathed, haven’t been fed, and haven’t been given water, or been turned. This isn’t a hospital; this is a concentration camp. Nowhere in the United States do we isolate people for hundreds of hours with no human contact; it’s not allowed even in prisons. In hospitals, we isolate patients from their families for days, and you have to say goodbye over an iPhone, or you have to shuttle people in to see them. I was fired for sneaking a Hispanic family in to say the last rites to their family. Thank you, Senator Johnson, for giving nurses the opportunity to represent our patients, because we’re not often thought of as leading professionals, though we are the missing link between the doctors and the patients. Thank you for this time. Thank you for being a nurse.