reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Pharmaceutical companies paid $1.06 billion to reviewers at leading medical journals, including the New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA, Lancet, and BMJ, allegedly corrupting the peer review process. Studies from the CDC, FDA, and Pfizer purportedly revealed major breaches in safety signals for COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy, but these findings were ignored. Independent researchers who published findings contradicting pharmaceutical industry narratives faced persecution, censorship, and threats to their medical licenses and board certifications. The speaker claims this happened to them personally.

The speaker has 32 years of experience in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries, with senior positions at Pfizer, including vice president and worldwide head of research in allergic and respiratory diseases. Since 2020, the speaker claims to have been speaking out against the fraudulent pandemic and the intentionally dangerous injections. The speaker states that they have been censored and smeared as a result. The speaker suggests that censorship and smearing is the experience of people who try to convey truths that authorities want suppressed.

In the video, Dr. Regina Wateel discusses her book, "Fisman's Fraud," which exposes the misinformation and fraudulent science used to implement pandemic policies in Canada. She highlights how a study claiming that the unvaccinated were responsible for the ongoing pandemic was based on a mathematical model rather than actual population data. Dr. Wateel expresses her frustration with the media for not questioning the study and the politicians for using it to justify strict restrictions and vaccine mandates. She also uncovers conflicts of interest, such as the lead author's ties to Moderna and the university's partnership with the pharmaceutical company. Dr. Wateel emphasizes the negative impact of these policies on individuals and calls for grassroots movements to address the issue.

No successful coronavirus vaccine has been made. Gene-based vaccines were tested on animals, leading to sickness and death. Despite concerns about safety and lack of long-term data, Canada continued vaccine rollout. A doctor raised safety concerns, was reprimanded for causing vaccine hesitancy, and saw neurological issues in patients post-vaccination. Questions to health authorities went unanswered, leading to a complaint to the College of Physicians and Surgeons.

Kayla Pollock, a vibrant 35-year-old mother from Ontario, faced a life-altering tragedy after receiving a Moderna COVID-19 booster. Initially healthy, she experienced severe side effects, leading to paralysis and loss of bodily functions. Despite being offered medical assistance in dying, she refused, determined to fight for her life and advocate for others with vaccine injuries. Kayla's struggle for recognition and support included filing a lawsuit against Moderna and seeking compensation from the Canadian government's vaccine injury program. Her story sparked important discussions about vaccine safety, informed consent, and the need for better support systems for those affected by adverse reactions. Kayla's journey became a powerful reminder of the human impact behind vaccine statistics, highlighting the importance of compassion and accountability in healthcare.

In September, media outlets falsely labeled me a sex criminal without naming accusers. This was the culmination of a years-long campaign to silence my dissenting views on major geopolitical issues like the war in Ukraine. My critiques, while not pro-Russia, questioned Western involvement. This led to accusations of being a Chinese propagandist by a US government-linked organization. Subsequently, the UK government, connected to the CIA, pressured social media to censor and demonetize me. This coordinated attack, involving organizations funded by Big Pharma and government, reveals the suppression of independent media and dissenting voices. The open contest of ideas is a sham, with governments actively working to silence opposition, even using taxpayer money against their own citizens. My experience exposes the fragility of free speech and the lengths to which powerful entities will go to maintain control. The fight continues, and the stakes are high.

In the autumn of 2021, Hugo de Jonge publicly stated on TV that 80 percent of the corona patients in hospitals were unvaccinated. The speaker, who was conducting research at the time, had precise hospital data on all corona patients and personally asked each patient whether they were vaccinated. They found that the actual percentage in their hospital was 35 percent, a substantial discrepancy from the 80 percent figure. The speaker and a colleague published the data online from their study, which was permissible because they were conducting integral scientific research and intended to publish whatever the results showed. However, they encountered significant pushback, which was largely political in nature. The backlash did not come from colleagues denying the data’s accuracy; instead, it came from political actors and environments. The speaker notes that the pushback included responses from political circles and not from medical colleagues or other scientists who would challenge the data. A notable example mentioned was pressure from the Forum for Democracy, with the implication that the data or its dissemination could be affected by the party’s interests. The speaker recalls being questioned about whether they would be retweeted or supported by that forum, and expresses astonishment at the idea that they would need to adjust their scientific conclusions to align with a political party’s interests. The core point emphasized is the discrepancy between the widely cited 80 percent unvaccinated figure and the speaker’s observed 35 percent within their hospital, and the subsequent political pushback encountered when publishing and sharing those findings.

Dr. Paul Oosterhuis, the first doctor to be suspended by APRA, shares his story of fighting against suspension due to his criticism of COVID policies. He expressed concerns about the harm caused by lockdowns and mandates and advocated for early treatments. Dr. Oosterhuis was suspended after tweeting about the low risk of COVID-related deaths in children receiving the experimental gene jab. Despite representing himself in court, he sued the Medical Council of New South Wales and eventually had his suspension lifted. Dr. Oosterhuis emphasizes the need for a precedent to protect other doctors and discusses his passion for anesthesia and making a difference in people's lives. A more in-depth discussion is planned for the future.

- The speaker notes dated 07/25/2022, reporting on developments related to baby deaths and baby funerals. They reference the UK government website, and specifically Northampton NHS in detail mentioning children's funerals, noting that contracts for this area have appeared that were previously unseen. They point to contractfinderservice.gov.uk and advise looking for “children's and babies' funerals.” They identify several awarded contracts, including one for Hertfordshire, another for Hertfordshire specifically for baby funerals, and contracts awarded for Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS, and Leicester Hospitals NHS. - The speaker mentions that the WNHS is another organization involved for those who do not want to have Mexican arranged funerals, stating that they will do that for you now. - A doctor in Australia, Dr. Luke McClinton, is described as leading the fertility services at the Mater Hospital and as a principal investigator for a series of randomized controlled trials. He is also described as the president of the Australian Institute for Restorative Reproductive Medicine and is labeled as “the top doctor in Australia in this field.” - The speaker asserts that Dr. Luke McClinton was sacked on Friday for not getting the jab and for attempting to release his data on miscarriages post-vaccination. They state that he has until the following Friday to exit his private practice rooms, as he is no longer allowed to practice in public or private settings. - The speaker claims that Dr. McClinton has been investigating miscarriages in couples post-vaccination and states that the “normal miscarriage rate” is between five and perhaps as high as sixteen percent. They then claim that since the introduction of the vaccine, he has found that seventy-four percent of women who are vaccinated are now having miscarriages. - The speaker reiterates the statistic: “Seventy four percent of women are having miscarriages who are vaccinated.” They suggest that this statistic would explain why hospitals allegedly want to deal directly with crematoria, with vans taking multiple babies directly to the crematorium, bypassing funeral directors. The speaker emphasizes that they had previously mentioned these points.

In the video, Dr. Regina Wateel discusses her book, "Fisman's Fraud," which exposes the misinformation and fraudulent science surrounding COVID-19 policies in Canada. She highlights how a study claiming that the unvaccinated were responsible for the ongoing pandemic was based on a mathematical model rather than actual population data. Despite numerous requests for retraction, the study was not corrected, and the media and politicians used it to justify strict restrictions and vaccine mandates. Dr. Wateel also uncovers conflicts of interest, such as the lead author's ties to Moderna and the university's partnership with the company. She emphasizes the devastating impact these policies had on individuals and calls for grassroots movements to address the corruption.

I was ostracized for questioning mainstream narratives on masks, lockdowns, and vaccines. My friend got the Pfizer vaccine and died the next day. I wish I had spoken out louder against the pressure to conform. His family and I believe the vaccine caused his death. The lack of autopsy adds to the injustice and anger over forcing vaccines on people, injecting doubt into their minds.

Speaker 0: It was January 2022 when a colleague of mine in the unit came to me saying, something's up. We've had a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year. And that's what got my curiosity piqued. Speaker 1: Their own government told us a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies. Speaker 2: I have lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuine for the best interests of Canadians. Speaker 3: Doctors made extra money to push vaccines and they were given a billing code to do it. I have pulled all the billing codes. Speaker 2: They've purchased the vaccine that hasn't been approved. They've distributed it to the province so the second it's approved, we can start jabbing ourselves with it. We can start jabbing pregnant mothers with it. Speaker 4: Why did we have to get these vaccinations? Like, why was this something that we had to do? You go to the hospital, you expect to have a baby, and you expect to go home, And then you don't. Speaker 0: I was suspect that there was criminal negligence on part of the government and the public health officials. Possible. They pushed on with this narrative to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and effective. Speaker 2: They had wiretapped her phone. They had harassed her. They had charged her. They didn't allow any expert witnesses to testify. Speaker 1: Our Canadian babies died, and the police are trying to cover it up to the point of stopping detective Helen Greaves from testifying about it. Speaker 2: The dominant individuals keep the subordinates in their place by constant aggression. Speaker 4: If you don't want to get vaccinated, that's your choice. But don't think you can get on a plane or a train besides vaccinated people and put them at risk. Speaker 2: It started off with CBC running a story to implicate her and to paint her with a brush that looks uncomplimentary to the public. Speaker 5: Canada has to shift their understanding of what the CBC is. It is a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada. Speaker 2: This is the most significant matter affecting our children today from a health perspective, and they're still not investigating. Everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, our health agencies, how they work together, how they censored information. It all ties together to this one case, and that's what makes it so dangerous.

An individual from a PR agency told the speaker that a government agency approached them to create a campaign against her, labeling her "anti-vaccine." The PR agent turned down the job but warned the speaker about the impending narrative. The speaker was initially skeptical, as she claims she had always stated she was not anti-vaccine. Despite this, the speaker says that she experienced the beginning of "cancel culture" when jobs were taken away from her, which was difficult as a single mother trying to pay for her son's therapies. She relied on writing books and persevering, and despite attempts to cancel her, she is still present and her son is now 22 years old.

I have been ordered to pay nearly $300,000 in legal costs, which I don't have, by the end of March. After advocating for patients and Canadians, the financial burden is overwhelming. Bankruptcy may be the only option, affecting my ability to practice medicine. A fundraiser has been launched to help with the legal fees. Despite the personal cost, advocating for truth and evidence-based policies has been crucial. Your support is appreciated.

Pharmaceutical companies paid $1.06 billion to reviewers at major medical journals, allegedly corrupting the peer review process. Studies from the CDC, FDA, and Pfizer purportedly revealed major breaches in COVID-19 vaccine safety signals during pregnancy, but these findings were allegedly ignored. Independent researchers who published findings contradicting pharmaceutical industry narratives faced persecution, censorship, and threats to their medical licenses and board certifications. The speaker claims this happened to them personally.

Tony Bittner, a nurse at Rady Children's Hospital, lost his job due to misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccine. He cared for children with myocarditis after vaccination and questioned why these cases were not being reported. Despite his dedication and successful efforts in saving a child's life, he faced ridicule from colleagues. Tony is a victim of the misinformation campaign and highlights the impact it had on his career and the pediatric community.

Countries with high vaccine uptake had major COVID outbreaks. Doctor Robert Malone said the vaccine is leaky, so it won't end the pandemic. Sharing this info led to hate and slander. People close to me turned on me publicly. Now we know who the cowards are, who would side with Nazis. Those who stayed silent are cowards too. Top comics shame anyone questioning big pharma and corrupt government.

Stanford professor Jay Bhattacharya, a respected epidemiologist, was visibility filtered and placed on a secret blacklist. This blacklist was used to deplatform and reduce visibility for doctors and scientists who shared information contradicting the CDC's narrative. Despite the fact that their information was scientifically valid, they were targeted. Professor Bhattacharya was unaware of being on this blacklist, which is reminiscent of the behavior of the East Germany Stasi.

A plastic surgeon from Utah, Dr. Michael Kirkmore Jr., faced 35 years in prison for allegedly refusing to follow the COVID narrative. He and three other doctors were accused of destroying over $20,000 worth of vaccine doses and issuing nearly 2,000 fraudulent vaccination cards. Instead of administering the vaccine, he allegedly gave patients saline shots, providing a way for them to attend school without the vaccine. Authorities investigated after tracing patterns where government-supplied COVID-19 vaccine doses were destroyed, and fraudulent CDC vaccination cards were issued. Some people paid dollars per card. Dr. Kirkmore was indicted on charges of conspiracy to defraud the United States, but the charges were dropped mid-trial. Supporters claim he didn't profit and acted on principle, giving parents a choice and saving lives. While what he did was illegal, some believe he was justified in helping people avoid something he felt was harmful or unnecessary.

Carrie Sakamoto, a mother from Alberta, suffered severe Bell's palsy after her second Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. Doctors linked her condition to the vaccine, and she received compensation. Despite facing backlash and denial of support, she continues to struggle with daily tasks due to paralysis and vertigo. Carrie relies on fundraising for therapy and medication, as her life has been drastically impacted by the vaccine injury.

In the video, Dr. Regina Wateel discusses her book "Fisman's Fraud" and the academic misinformation surrounding COVID-19 policies in Canada. She highlights how the government and media used a fraudulent study to justify strict restrictions and vaccine mandates. Dr. Wateel discovered that the study was based on a mathematical model rather than actual population data. She faced resistance from the journal, the University of Toronto, and the Canadian government when she tried to expose the fraud. Dr. Wateel also reveals conflicts of interest, such as the lead author's ties to Moderna. The consequences of these policies were devastating for many Canadians, including restrictions on unvaccinated individuals and the loss of jobs and opportunities. Dr. Wateel emphasizes the need for individuals and grassroots movements to take action against such manipulation.

100 Canadian children have died after receiving Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, but this information is being covered up. Many kids were mandated vaccines to play sports. No one is taking responsibility for these deaths, with Health Canada, public health officials, and medical organizations all denying any deaths from the vaccines. The speaker has reported on these deaths on social media, leading to attempts to shut down their accounts.

We broke the public's trust by silencing one side of the debate, labeling experts as trustworthy and critics as dangerous. As a journalist, I heard stories of suffering and pain from people affected by lockdowns and vaccine mandates, but these stories were not being told. This burden affected my well-being as these people trusted me to share their truth.

A physician recounts being attacked for offering alternative COVID treatments and questioning vaccine efficacy. Despite treating thousands of patients and being proven more accurate than public health authorities, she is still fighting to keep her medical license. The physician describes treating a sheriff's deputy with COVID in February, following the vaccine rollout, when ivermectin was difficult to obtain. She notes primary care doctors often did not treat viruses, leading to catastrophic outcomes. After President Trump touted hydroxychloroquine, the Texas State Board of Pharmacy restricted its prescription. The government then launched a PR campaign against ivermectin, influencing hospitals to mandate vaccines. The physician observed more vaccinated individuals contracting COVID with similar or worse symptoms. Monoclonal antibodies, which worked effectively, were removed as an option, allegedly to promote vaccination. A urology department considered refusing unvaccinated patients. The physician faced obstacles in obtaining emergency privileges to administer ivermectin to the sheriff's deputy, who ultimately survived but suffered long-term health issues and later passed away. The Texas Medical Board is pursuing charges against the physician for recommending COVID therapy. The expert witness against her is a Planned Parenthood lab director. She highlights the politicization of medicine, the loss of power for doctors, and the influence of corporations and insurance companies. She expresses concern over COVID shot injuries, the shots being added to the childhood vaccine schedule, and the potential for long-term immune system damage.