TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

mRNA can modify DNA by replacing segments with synthetic versions, potentially making individuals patentable. Vaccinations have already begun, with nasal test swabs being used to deliver vaccines that could target the brain. As a doctor, I find this concerning. Masks are required over the mouth, supposedly to prevent the spread of COVID-19 through saliva. However, instead of swabbing the mouth, long Q-tips are inserted deep into the nasal cavity, which is close to the brain. There’s a thin bone plate separating the brain from the nasal sinuses, raising questions about the safety and purpose of these procedures.

All childhood vaccines will soon contain mRNA, making them gene therapies that alter genetics. The vaccines won't require reapproval or go through any additional processes. The focus is on integrating mRNA into every vaccine, which is concerning because it involves tinkering with genes. The speaker urges people to be cautious and not get any vaccines, emphasizing their strong opposition to it. The speaker believes that there is a significant amount of money involved in this shift towards gene therapies.

it's modified mRNA, and it's designed not to degrade, and there are studies that show it sticks around the body. We don't know how long. The lipid nanoparticle was designed to permeate difficult to permeate barriers, like the blood brain, like placenta barrier. Did you believe when Fauci told us that the mRNA shot would stay in the arm? In rats, it biodistributed all over the body, accumulated in the adrenal glands, in the ovaries. This encapsulated lipid nanoparticle distributes all over the body, and when it attaches to a cell, it unloads its mRNA into the cell and turns the cell into a manufacturing cell of a protein that is toxic to it. They're turning cells like a heart cell into a manufacturing site for the spike protein, which is toxic, the body attacks it. The designers of the injection knew it. And Anthony Fauci knew it, and he lied. DNA contamination ... McKernan study ... 36 to 627 times. The allowed amount is ten nanograms per dose. That saves three point two million lives. No. It didn't. It's impossible. That's entirely possible.

DNA stands for Deoxyribonucleic acid, which is the blueprint for making a human being. Every molecule in our body is coded for in DNA. The messenger RNA (mRNA) acts as a messenger, carrying instructions from DNA to make proteins and heal injuries. This process happens constantly because DNA is at the center of our being. However, there are concerns about introducing an alien mRNA, like one from Bill Gates, who is accused of having a genocidal agenda. Bill Gates allegedly has the means to carry out population reduction, which his father and grandfather believed in.

Every day, just the 1% of the cells of your DNA that gets replicated stretches from here to the sun four times. If you're to line it up end by end, that's very hard to conceptualize. But it should give you a little bit of humility before you go and start monkeying with it with these vaccines that can actually alter your DNA. And that's what I'm gonna show you. Is that the vaccines had a DNA contamination in them that didn't tell you about that could in fact alter your genome. Alright? These people are vibe coding your genome. And this is a major attack surface to the human gene pool because if this thing starts to alter the lifespan of people, it's going to part you with your Bitcoin. You're gonna end up spending money in a fiat system that has no controls, has no liability, and ends up oftentimes inducing mandates to get what it wants done. Many people had have peer have gone and replicated this work. It happened on Twitter. It did not happen very quickly in the peer review system. The peer review system kinda kicked it out. Some of these papers have now been peer reviewed, but it took years for them to come to this conclusion. Now, the FDA, the EMA and the TGA have all admitted that this mistake has happened. How did it happen? There's a big bait and switch. Pfizer actually ran the trial of 22,000 people on the process on the left and after they got to the trial, they then switched to the process on the right and didn't retrial the drug. And in doing so, they left a tremendous amount of excess DNA behind in the product. So all of the vaccine efficiency numbers you've heard in the news are flawed. They're not real because that's not what actually went into the trial. What went to the public was actually something that came out of this process too. It's published now in the BMJ that this fraud happened and no one has yet been prosecuted for it. So what did they leave in there? What they left in there was something we know from the polio scandal. If you're not familiar with the polio scandal, that polio vaccines were also contaminated with something known as SV40 and it created a massive cancer wave. Now the whole virus isn't in these vaccines, but there is a very curious part of this called the SV40 region that Pfizer intentionally removed from the disclosure that they gave to the FDA. So the FDA has admitted that this SV40 material is in there. They did not spell this out to the regulators. The regulators did not find them and they're actually running cover for them saying this DNA is too little consequence to matter, it's too small, and it's not functional. But we know it's functional because Dean et al has published that this piece of DNA drives DNA straight to the nucleus. It gets used in gene therapy vectors.

A scientist studying the human genome found that it consists of a double helix with 72,000 genes on each side, totaling 144,000 genes. This number is seen as a signature of God. However, with the introduction of mRNA messaging technology, a third strand can be added, creating a triple helix. This new strand adds another 72,000 genes, resulting in a total of 216,000 genes. Some believe this is connected to the number of the beast mentioned in the Bible, which is 666. Multiplying 600 by 60 by 6 also equals 216,000.

All childhood vaccines will soon be mRNA-based gene therapies, without requiring reapproval. This means that getting any type of vaccine will alter a person's genetics. The focus is now on integrating mRNA into all vaccines, which raises concerns about tinkering with genes. The speaker strongly opposes vaccines and vows not to get any more, emphasizing the financial interests involved in this shift.

Scientists have discovered electromagnetic devices in vials that self-assemble when exposed to electromagnetic frequencies from smartphones or towers. These devices, made of Graphene Oxide, can mimic cells and proteins to build structures in the body. Graphene Oxide, combined with biological proteins, creates transducers that alter the body's electromagnetic field. mRNA is described as temporary instructions for cells to produce proteins, with DNA as the storage. This technology is likened to an operating system on Moderna's website.

There are claims that a piece of DNA has been inserted into everyone's genome without their knowledge, but who did it and why? It may sound like science fiction, but the facts can't be discounted. They're tampering with our DNA and are able to shut down our immune systems. It's a widespread failure of our immune systems through gene tampering. A virus within a virus put there through the smallpox vaccine that removes the adenosine deaminase gene from your DNA. This is called the Spartan virus, and it uses a process called CRISPR Cas nine. It's the ultimate weapon, the ability to depopulate the planet by tampering with their DNA through gene editing. Our own government lies as a matter of policy and hoards technology at the expense of human life with a darker objective: the takeover of America and then the world by any means necessary. The government collects your data and monitors your whereabouts with impunity, and it's happening all around us.

We're at a point where humanity mirrors the days of Noah, when the Nephilim altered human DNA. The only humans with pure, unaltered DNA as God intended are the unvaccinated. I've recreated my blood slides and now find anomalies in everyone, including myself, that I never saw in the unvaccinated before. These anomalies don't decompose, but morph into something else, and can evolve as they build. Vaccinated individuals are now legally considered transhuman and no longer possess natural human rights, according to the Supreme Court. mRNA vaccines create a synthetic genome, which is patentable, and means you have been turned into a product, and not a natural person.

There's a scientist that was studying the human genome, and he studied it for over twenty five years. And each side of the helix has 72,000 genes, which combined makes a 144,000 genes total in the human genome. That's a signature from god right there. This new technology they come out with introduces the third strand through mRNA messaging technology. It actually breaks a strand and puts in a third strand, which creates a triple helix. You add that together, you have a 144,000, a signature from God, showing you are created. The number of the beast is six six six or as the bible states, 600, threescore, and six. Now multiply this. 600 times 60 times six equals 216,000.

When was the last time you saw a strand of DNA? It's the genetic code in almost every cell, defining who you are. Recently, there's been a rumor that COVID-19 vaccines alter your DNA. The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines use messenger RNA (mRNA) technology. After injection, the vaccine instructs your cells to prepare for an incoming virus, prompting your immune system to create antibodies. Importantly, the vaccine never enters the nucleus where your DNA resides, and once your cells use the vaccine, they destroy it. While these vaccines are new, mRNA technology has been in development for over a decade. So, if you're concerned about the vaccine changing your DNA, there's no need to worry. You remain unchanged.

There are humanized mice and chimeras exist, and they don't differentiate a genome to them as a genome. It cites a US Supreme Court decision, described as 'good law,' with the legislature able to change it. The holding: 'It is also possible to create DNA synthetically through the process similarly well known in the field of genetics. One such method begins with an mRNA molecule and uses the natural bonding properties of nucleotides to create a new synthetic DNA molecule.' It continues: 'you can't, in the world of intellectual property, you cannot patent something that already exists in nature. If you change that, however, into something synthetic, that new genome is in fact patentable.' The case holds that 'If you use messenger RNA to create a synthetic genome, that new genome is your intellectual property rights.' The conversation ties this to vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna) and asks how to separate the synthetic genome from DNA, noting the shots 'go throughout your entire body' and 'go everywhere.'

There is no question that the inclusion of DNA was not an accident, and the 1/3 DNA, 2/3 RNA ratio was intentional. The long-term effects of both DNA and RNA are influencing the ability to fight cancer. The key question is what effect the DNA has on the cell nucleus, and how to differentiate its damage from that of mRNA. mRNA is connected to ACE 2 receptors and causes damage throughout the reproductive and cardio systems. mRNA creates a spike protein flag, which the immune system attacks, leading to organ damage. The presence of DNA makes the process last longer. While mRNA would create spike for 8-12 months, DNA can influence the nucleus for years, producing mRNA near the nucleus. This extends the process from months to 8-10 years due to the decision to include DNA.

mRNA, short for messenger RNA, plays a crucial role in our cells. When there is an injury or damage, DNA sends a message to the cell through mRNA to produce a specific protein that can fix the problem. This process happens constantly because it is essential for our well-being. However, there are concerns about the intentions behind mRNA. Some believe that external forces, like Bill Gates, want to manipulate our cells with harmful messages. Bill Gates has been associated with eugenics and population reduction, and now he has the means to carry out his depopulation agenda.

Every childhood vaccine will be mRNA, becoming gene therapies that alter genetics without re-approval. COVID vaccines were profitable data and experimentation tools, but the danger lies in continued genetic tinkering. mRNA is being integrated into every vaccine. Therefore, no vaccines should be taken. All vaccines are being redesigned to include gene therapies because there is so much money in it.

"Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA. It's not just mRNA." "This DNA is the DNA vector that was used as the template for the in vitro transcription reaction when they made the mRNA." "I sequenced it in my own lab." "The vials of Pfizer vaccine that were given out here in Colombia, one of my colleagues was in charge of that vaccination program in the College of Pharmacy." "And for reasons that I still don't understand, he kept every single vial." "So he had a whole freezer full of the empty vials." "And I checked these two batches, and I checked them by sequencing." "It's surprising that there's any DNA in there." "This DNA, in my view, it could be causing some of the rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest."

- The discussion opens with a critique of how public health authorities in the United States and much of the media discouraged experimentation with COVID-19 treatments, instead pushing vaccination and portraying other approaches as dangerous. The hosts ask why treatments were sidelined and treated as heretical to question. - Speaker 1 explains that the core idea was to stamp out “vaccine hesitation,” which he frames not as a purely scientific issue but as a form of heresy. He notes a broad literature on vaccine hesitancy and contrasts it with the perception of the vaccine as a liberating savior. He points to a Vatican €20 silver coin (2022) commemorating the COVID-19 vaccine, described by Vatican catalogs as “a boy prepares to receive the Eucharist,” which the speakers interpret as an overlay of religious iconography with vaccination imagery. They also reference Diego Rivera’s mural in Detroit, interpreted as depicting the vaccine as a Eucharist, and a South African church banner reading “even the blood of Christ cannot protect you, get vaccinated,” highlighting what they see as provocative uses of religious symbolism to promote vaccination. - They claim that the Biden administration’s COVID Vaccine Corps distributed billions of dollars to major sports leagues (NFL, MLB) and that many mainline churches reportedly received money to push vaccination, with many clergy not opposing the push. The implication is that monetary incentives influenced public figures and organizations to advocate for vaccines, contributing to a climate in which questioning orthodoxy was difficult. - The speakers discuss the social dynamics around vaccine “heresy,” using Aaron Rodgers’ experience with isolation and shaming in the NFL and Novak Djokovic’s experiences in Australia to illustrate how prominent individuals who questioned or fell outside the orthodoxy faced punitive pressure. They compare this to a Reformation-era conflict over doctrinal correctness and describe a psychology of stigmatizing dissent as a tool to enforce conformity. - They argue the imperative driving institutions was the belief that the vaccine was the central, non-negotiable public-health objective, seemingly above other medical considerations. The central question they raise is why vaccines became the sole priority, seemingly overriding a broader, more nuanced evaluation of medical options and individual risk. - The conversation shifts to epistemology and the nature of science. Speaker 1 suggests medicine often relies on orthodoxies and presuppositions, rather than purely empirical processes. He recounts a Kantian view that interpretation depends on preexisting categories, and he uses this to argue that medical decision-making can be constrained by established doctrines, which may obscure questions about optimization and safety. - They recount the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and discuss Sara Sotomayor’s dissent, which argued that liability exposure is a key incentive for safety and improvement in vaccine development. They argue that the current system creates minimal liability for manufacturers, reducing the incentive to optimize safety, and they use this to question how the system encourages continuous safety improvements. - The hosts recount the early-treatment movement led by Peter McCullough and others, including a Senate hearing organized by Ron Johnson in November 2020 to discuss early-treatment options with FDA-approved drugs like hydroxychloroquine. They criticize what they describe as aggressive pushback against such approaches, noting that McCullough faced professional sanctions and lawsuits despite presenting peer-reviewed literature. - They return to the concept of orthodoxy and dogma, arguing that the medical establishment often suppresses dissent, citing YouTube removing a McCullough interview and the broader pattern of silencing challenge to the vaccine narrative. They stress that the social and institutional systems prize conformity and punish those who deviate, creating a climate of distrust toward official health bodies. - The discussion broadens into metaphysical and philosophical territory, with references to the Grand Inquisitor from Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov. They propose that elites—whether religious, political, or scientific—tend to prefer “taking care” of people through control rather than preserving individual responsibility and free will. The Grand Inquisitor tale is used to illustrate a recurring human temptation: to replace personal liberty with a protected, paternalistic order. - They discuss messenger RNA (mRNA) technology as a central manifestation of Promethean or Luciferian intellect—humans attempting to “read and write in the language of God.” They describe the scientific arc from transcription and translation to mRNA vaccines, noting Francis Collins’s The Language of God and the idea of humans “coding life.” They caution that mRNA vaccines involve injecting genetic material and point to the symbolic and ritual power of vaccination as a form of modern sacrament. - The speakers emphasize that the mRNA approach represents both a profound scientific achievement and a source of deep concern. They discuss fertility signals and potential adverse effects, including myocarditis in young people, and cite the July 2021 NEJM case study as highlighting safety concerns for myocarditis in adolescent males. They reference the FDA deliberative-committee discussions, noting that some influential voices publicly questioned the risk-benefit calculus for young people, yet faced pressure or dismissal within the orthodox framework. - They describe post-hoc investigations and testimonies suggesting that adverse events (like myocarditis) might have been downplayed or obscured, and they assert that public trust in health institutions has eroded as a result. They mention ongoing debates about whether vaccine-induced changes might affect future generations, referencing studies about transcripts of mRNA in cancer cells and liver cells, and they stress the need for independent scrutiny by scientists not “entranced” by the vaccine program. - The dialogue returns to the broader human condition: a tension between curiosity and restraint, knowledge and humility. They return to Dostoevsky’s moral questions about free will, responsibility, and the limits of human knowledge, concluding that scientific hubris can lead to dangerous consequences when it overrides open inquiry and accountability. - In closing, while the guests reflect on past missteps and the need for integrity in medicine, they underscore the ongoing questions about how evidence is interpreted, how dissent is treated, and how society balances scientific progress with humility, transparency, and respect for individual judgment.

They claim that zoological viruses are in vaccines and cell lines, targeting specific races and genders. The goal is to alter DNA for a one-world order. Vaccines contain harmful viruses like polio, leading to antibody-dependent enhancement. The push for mass injections is to control the population. They argue against all vaccines, labeling them as synthetic poisons. The speaker claims to have had Omicron in 2000 and 2010, suggesting widespread exposure. The ultimate aim is to manipulate the environment through mass injections.

We are in a digital and scientific revolution, hacking the software of life with mRNA. Our body is made of organs, organs of cells, and in each cell is messenger RNA transmitting DNA information to proteins. This "operating system" can be altered to impact diseases like the flu and cancer. For instance, instead of injecting virus proteins for a flu vaccine, mRNA instructions can teach the body to make its own protection. This mRNA technology has vast potential for disease prevention and treatment.

Speaker 0: The entire human genome has been poisoned with a gene that has never been in the human genome ever in history. Reverse transcriptase doesn't only cause cancer. If something is reverse transcribed and alters the DNA of a sperm or an egg, that DNA change, if that sperm or egg survives and turns into a human being, lasts forever. Speaker 1: This is the magnitude of evil we are dealing with. We are dealing with people who have the money, the power to pollute the entire human genome. I think because of this, we're gonna lose about a billion children. So any mother any mother to be, even if she is not pregnant yet, if she gets an mRNA vaccine, those mRNAs are gonna go to the ovaries. There's DNA that stays silent, that is never transcribed into proteins until the next generation. And it'll only show up when that adult tries to have another child. Five billion people have been injected so far on this planet. Half of them are women. Two and a half billion. Half of them will be women who are young enough to have children. There are one point two five billion carriers of mutations in the egg cell line of their bodies. One point two five million women who are capable of giving birth to children who carry something that has never been seen before in the human species, in the entire human genome.

We're at a critical point, mirroring the times of Noah when the Nephilim altered humanity. Back then, Noah's family remained pure, untainted by outside influence. Today, the unvaccinated are the only ones with unaltered human DNA as God intended. If you have been vaccinated, you have allowed these new Nimrods to change your DNA. Your body will never be the same.

The speaker claims mRNA is in the food supply. Merck has been injecting mRNA into pigs since 2018 with a product called Sequebiti. They claim to be able to make transmissible mRNA, meaning they can put it in an animal so that it transmits to whoever is ingesting it, effectively vaccinating them. The speaker suggests this could be engineered into plants and animals. Without informed consent laws, people who refused mRNA vaccines may get them through their food.

We are facing a significant threat from those who have the means to contaminate the entire human genome. The mRNA vaccines could potentially affect future generations, as the injected genetic material may remain dormant until the next generation tries to have children. With billions of people already vaccinated, including millions of women capable of giving birth, there is a concern that these vaccines could introduce never-before-seen mutations into the human species. The true impact will only be known when problems arise in the offspring and subsequent generations. This is the enormity of the problem we are confronting.

I did this myself. And lo and behold, I discovered a bunch of DNA pieces, in the mRNA vaccines. The public deserves to know what they're taking. If it's a vaccine or anything else, the public deserves to know what's in it. Molecular biology tools can do this for you. But we can quantify down to the molecule number. We did an experiment to prove it. And it's the exact same frequency that I predicted about a year ago, about one in a thousand to one in ten thousand cells have taken up different pieces of this vaccine and it's a permanent fixture of their genomes now. This proves that it happens with this contaminating DNA, which is why I was so weirded out about this stuff when I first discovered it.