TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker notes that there is fear people want Trump to have done something gross with women, but 'I really don't believe wanna be clear. I do not believe that. Yeah. Not covering for Trump. I just don't think that's true.' They insist there is no indication, saying they've spoken to people 'close to Epstein, very close to Epstein, who've told me off camera, in private, no, it's not. Trump never did that shit.' The speaker adds, 'So I don't think it's about that.' They question why 'no one talking to Les Wexner?' and end with 'And' (truncated). The focus remains unclear.

Q has told us symbolism would be their downfall. Of course, AOL's recent software that was launched was called Moloch and they used an owl as the logo. Tegan and Legend were involved in a bizarre Twitter battle over the holiday weekend. The celebrity couple even threatening to take legal action over what was said about them on social media. Hey. Shut ahead, Chrissy. The Twitter fight pitted supermodel Chrissy Teigen against Liz Crokin, a self described journalist who supports president Trump. It's centered around Pizzagate, the debunked Internet conspiracy theory that a Washington DC pizza restaurant was involved in a child sex ring tied to Democrats. In a tweet that has since been deleted, Crokin posted photos of Tegan's one year old Luna writing, Chrissy Tegan's daughter dressed as a hot dog, Alice in Wonderland in a pineapple, but note pizza emoji that was taken as a reference to Pizzagate by some, including Tegan who tweeted back. I'm pretty sure this sick person is saying we are dark sided Pizzagate pedophiles who traffic our daughter. Crokin denied making that accusation, but responded, Chrissy, you run-in circle with people who rape, torture, and traffic kids. This is a fact. I expose sex trafficking for a living. Teigen replied, anyone know any good lawyers? Her husband, John Legend, also weighed in. You need to take my family's name out of your mouth before you get sued. Chrissy Teigen recently left social media due to the trolling she got from Anon's as a result of her pedo themed tweets that people dug up from her Twitter. Just pick pick pick it out, read it, and answer. Public place, you did it. Oh. Is this the best or the worst? What are doing? The best. Okay. The best. Probably the Obama thing. John, what's the oh god. What? Oh god. John? What? What what is what is your wife talking about? I don't know. We heard We're not in there. Here's the get back in. What happened? We're not gonna discuss that. We're gonna discuss it? We're not. We're not. Oh my god. Secret service. Come here. Jump back in. Hi. Look at John. Look at I don't Hi. We're not talking about it. That's the truth. That is an awesome answer. Not the White House. Not the It was not the It was not at the White House. A 100%. Not the way. Promise. He was not elected yet. Okay. Anyway, we're moving. I'm sorry. I'm in trouble now. No. You Previously, president Trump had mocked Adam Schiff in a tweet, but could there be some deeper meaning hinted here? The Little Kids Foundation has had several training workshops within Adam Schiff's 28th District Of California. Schiff was being black mailed over a death cover up that occurred at the standard hotel. Schiff was concerned he might be implicated in a paedophile ring that was being run out of the hotel. Tina Allen began her service to the HeartTouch project as a volunteer massage therapist and was the youngest member of the board of directors. As director for the children's programme for the HeartTouch Project, she provided specialised education and inspiration for massage therapists, medical personnel, and parents committed to addressing the needs of medically challenged infants and children who are hospitalised or in hospice care. Here are images taken from her book. Notice the pizza references. Looks like little kids also has visited Haiti. What a coincidence. Oh, and look. Here's a picture of Adam Schiff in Haiti too. Crooked Adam Schiff. He's so crooked. He's so crooked. Shifty Schiff. We got them lined up, Adam. You little pencil neck. You little pencil neck. You little pencil neck. You little pencil neck. Nine inches. He buys the smallest shirt collar you can get, and it's loose. He buys the smallest shirt collar you can get, and it's loose. He waits and has ties to the Gates mansion. He’s involved with the Gates. Carver seven's Gary Horker is live near the Gates compound in Medina. And, Gary, this man worked as an engineer for the family. That's what SPD and intelligence found out, Steve. They found out that the man actually worked for the Bill and Melinda Gates mansion on the grounds of their sprawling 66,000 square foot estate, and that's where they found him and questioned him last March. The estate is behind us right on the lakefront here, but this is a few blocks away, and it's as close as their security will allow us to get. But according to King County prosecutors, 51 year old Rick Allen Jones was questioned by detectives about images of child porn and even child rape that were sent from Jones' home computer. Does anyone else find it weird that Bill Gates waited until after Jeffrey Epstein was convicted of being a pedophile to start hanging out together? Epstein really is the keystone to open up this subject of child trafficking by the deep state to the public. Oprah has featured in this video flying around the world to hang out with some of the world's richest pedophiles. Did you know she had a school and it was without its own controversy? People say Pitagate was fake but here is an example of a pedo that was caught and used the pizza emoji in his post. The media is a bought and paid for tool of the deep state. This is why they have not stopped going for president Trump since he announced he was going to run. This is why you see such a difference in how the media treated Obama versus how they treated president Trump. The Q Team Patriots have cornered the deep steak cabal which can be seen by this cue drop about LDR or Linda Rothschild. The real pandemic is the deep state child trafficking global operation. It is time for the pedos to be exposed and for the masses to wake up to the reality of pedogate.

Speaker 1 acknowledges knowing Ali was bisexual/gay and prioritizes winning/success over that fact. He states he could apologize but it wouldn't be the truth. He cites Marjorie Taylor Greene at AFPAC, involvement in Stop the Steal, and friendship with Kanye West as positive outcomes. He admits to a "sociopathic commitment to accomplishing my goals." Speaker 2 questions Speaker 1 about his continued association with Ali, referencing claims that they communicate daily. Speaker 1 confirms they communicated daily while working for Ye in December and states that "Ye '24 is still going on," implying continued communication. Speaker 2 expresses concern about associating with "creeps." Speaker 1 accuses Speaker 2 of being "weasily."

The speaker notes that people might be surprised that he has never interacted with Donald Trump face to face, though that is about to change. The speaker then references a statement made last month by Trump, who suggested that the speaker turned black recently for political purposes, questioning a core part of his identity. The speaker dismisses this as the same old tired playbook and declines to comment further. The speaker then expresses confusion as to why a shot wasn't taken. The speaker reiterates that people might be surprised that he has never interacted with Trump.

I did not like Jeffrey Epstein and never wanted anything to do with him. While others associated with him, went to his island and other places, I never did. I have good taste. James Patterson, a member of Mar-a-Lago, confirmed that I threw Epstein out many years ago. I am not a fan of him. Also, those who came into the country illegally must be deported.

Speaker 0 says that more than a decade ago, President Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago and was one of the few prominent people reportedly willing to help law enforcement go after Epstein, who is described as a disgusting child abuser and sex trafficker. They say this is common knowledge.

Speaker addresses rumors that 'Trump did something gross with women' and says, 'I I really don't believe wanna be clear. I do not believe that. Yeah. Not covering for Trump. I just don't think that's true.' They assert they've seen no indication of it and have spoken to people, 'to be totally honest with you, close to Epstein, very close to Epstein, who've told me off camera, in private, no, it's not. Trump never did that shit.' The remarks emphasize that the issue isn't about that alleged conduct. The speaker then questions, 'But why is no one talking to Les Wexner?'

Bill Clinton is mentioned in relation to Jeffrey Epstein's island, which is described as a cesspool. The speaker claims to have knowledge of the planes associated with the island, but clarifies that they are not friends with the people involved. The speaker distances themselves from Epstein, stating that they threw him out of their club many years ago and never visited his island. They mention that others, including James Patterson, have also distanced themselves from Epstein. The speaker acknowledges knowing Epstein in the past but claims to have had a falling out and not being a fan of his for about 15 years.

I am friends with Trump and so is the speaker. They talk often and even golf together. They recently attended a UFC event with Dana White and the crowd. The speaker finds these experiences to be very American. The speaker emphasizes that aside from Trump's political image, they have become comfortable as friends and enjoy discussing various topics, including policy and sports. The speaker admires Trump's children and believes that a well-put-together family reflects positively on him. They express strong admiration for Trump, stating that they don't just like him, but they love him.

Speaker 1 clarifies that he was not calling Trump supporters garbage, reading: "I refer to the hateful rhetoric about Puerto Rico spewed by Trump's supporter at his Madison Square Garden rally as garbage, which is the only word I can think of to describe it. His demonization of Latinos is unconscionable." "That's all I meant to say." "The comments the comments at the rally don't reflect who we are as a nation." "No." "He does not view Trump supporters or anybody who who supports Trump as garbage." He adds: "If the president has said this for more than three years now, he has said multiple times that he is a president for all. It doesn't matter if you live in a red state. It doesn't matter if you live in a blue state." "He believes that he's a president for all."

The speaker explains why they support Donald Trump, stating that they have knowledge of the true history of both the Republican and Democratic parties. They mention that the Ku Klux Klan originated from the Democratic party and that every civil rights legislation was passed by Republicans, not Democrats. They also mention Trump's involvement in the culture, receiving awards with prominent figures like Muhammad Ali and Rosa Parks. The speaker expresses their disbelief in the media's portrayal of Trump as racist, as they never heard any black leaders or their grandmother say anything negative about him. They reminisce about a time when America was great and there was less crime.

There's a massive difference between Donald Trump who banned Epstein from Mar A Lago when he found out about his disgusting hobbies and somebody like Bill Clinton who rode shotgun to Epstein's island doing who knows what with who knows who after getting out out of office. One rejected the predator and the other partied with him. And that's what Gen is frustrated with. We want accountability. We want transparency. That's not what we had under the Biden administration. And that right there is exactly why we voted for Trump. We're looking at the economy now where he's performed CPR on the American dream, making it possible again for Gen Z to come into this world. This time last year on Abiodunatics, thankfully, we have a president who's going to start addressing that, and we need to see that soon before the midterm.

The speaker defends himself against allegations and claims to have nothing to hide. He offers to release all evidence to prove his innocence. The interviewer brings up the association with Jeffrey Epstein, to which the speaker explains that he and his wife had massages at Epstein's house but denies any wrongdoing. He mentions that many prominent individuals also had massages there and that his friendship with Epstein was purely academic. The speaker argues that having a massage does not make him guilty and that the person making the allegations has admitted to possible mistaken identification. He concludes by stating that he and his wife are innocent.

Speaker 0: "I don't understand why it's a hostile act. I talked to president Clinton... I'm sorry, president, Trump back in 2009 and several times after that. He didn't think that it was a hoax then. In fact, he helped me. He got on the phone. He told me things that were helping our investigation." Speaker 1: "The only thing... Trump is the only person who, in 02/2009, picked up the phone and said, let's just talk. I'll give you as much time as you want. I'll tell you what you need to know and was very helpful in the information that he gave and gave no indication whatsoever that he was involved in anything untoward whatsoever, but had good information that checked out and that helped us. And then we didn't have to take a deposition of him." "So Do you know if there's any truth to James Patterson's claims that Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar A Lago?" Speaker 0: "I've definitely heard that." Speaker 2: "Epstein was inappropriate with the member's daughter. I went to mister Trump and he threw him right out." Speaker 3: "So it's your understanding then that president Trump didn't know what Jeffrey Epstein was up to?" Speaker 0: "That is correct." Speaker 2: "Epstein liked stars... He loaned Clinton his plane at least on four occasions and it was, it had to do with the foundation." Speaker 4: "The pilot said Trump was on the plane; it was actually a trip from Mar A Lago to New York, not to the island." Speaker 0: "And our investigation wasn't looking into him, but he was helping us then. He didn't treat this as a hoax. I want transparency." Speaker 3: "Did anybody see or hear of the president himself doing anything inappropriate as it related to Jeffrey Epstein? No."

Epstein was banned from Mar-a-Lago by Trump after he flirted with someone's underage daughter. Trump made it clear that such behavior was not tolerated at his club. Epstein, a wealthy Palm Beach resident known for throwing parties, was a member at the time. However, once people discovered his true nature, they distanced themselves from him, including President Trump. Trump emphasized that he never associated with Epstein and took action to remove him from the club. This incident provides clear evidence that Trump was not involved in any illegal activities.

The speaker mentions that there have been accusations against President Trump regarding his involvement in certain activities, but Trump supporters tend to dismiss such claims. The speaker, who is a lawyer, states that they have no information or opinion on the validity of these claims. However, they do mention that in 2009, when they served subpoenas to various individuals, President Trump was the only person who cooperated and provided helpful information. The speaker is not aware of the truth behind James Patterson's claims about Trump kicking Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago.

The speaker defends himself against allegations and claims to have nothing to hide. He offers to release all evidence to prove his innocence. The interviewer brings up the association with Jeffrey Epstein, to which the speaker explains that he and his wife had massages at Epstein's house, but denies any wrongdoing. He mentions that many prominent individuals also had massages there and that his friendship with Epstein was purely academic. The speaker argues that having a massage does not make him guilty and that the person accusing him has admitted to possible mistaken identification. He asserts his innocence and states that neither he nor his wife are guilty.

The conversation revolves around whether Mr. Bobolinski was a guest of Donald Trump at a presidential debate. Despite initially claiming not to recall, he eventually confirms that he was indeed a guest of Trump at the debate. The discussion also touches on Mr. Bobolinski's interactions with Trump officials during the event.

Trump's current situation is his own doing, unrelated to his supporters or American democracy. Comparisons to Bill Clinton's past actions are brought up, questioning the different treatment between the two presidents. The conversation highlights financial discrepancies and ethical judgments based on political affiliation.

There's a massive difference between Donald Trump who banned Epstein from Mar A Lago when he found out about his disgusting hobbies and somebody like Bill Clinton who rode shotgun to Epstein's island doing who knows what with who knows who after getting out of office. One rejected the predator and the other partied with him. And that's what Gen is frustrated with. We want accountability. We want transparency. That's not what we had under the Biden administration. And that there is exactly why we voted for Trump. He's performed CPR on the American dream. This time last year on Abiodunatics, thankfully, we have a president who's going to start addressing that, and we need to see that soon before the midterm.

The speaker states they had no involvement with "the disgusting stuff" and blocked the person in question from their club upon learning about it. They question why this person isn't publicly refuting the allegations. The speaker claims to know the contents of the files and asserts there is nothing incriminating about Donald Trump in them, "as far as I know."

Speaker 0 explains that Epstein’s legal problems began with police investigations into allegations that underage women were coming to Epstein’s house. Epstein allegedly believed that Trump was the first to inform the police about what was happening at Epstein’s house, and from that point they became bitter enemies. Speaker 1 asks if this is what Epstein is telling him. Speaker 0 confirms that this is the version he is relaying, as presented by “Oh, the hoax yesterday.” Speaker 2 clarifies that “the hoax” refers to Democrats using a narrative to attack him. He says Epstein has never said or suggested or implied that the hoax is real; he has talked to Epstein many times. He states that the whole thing comes across as a hoax, not that Epstein’s actions are a hoax. He explains that Epstein believes himself innocent, and that when he first heard the rumor, he kicked him out of Maribago. He adds that Epstein was an FBI informant trying to take this matter down. The president knows and has great sympathy for the women who have suffered harms; it’s detestable to him. He and the speaker have spoken as recently as twenty-four hours ago. What he is talking about, according to Speaker 2, are the Democrats who are pursuing this with impure motives. If they truly cared, he asks, why didn’t they act during the four years of the Biden administration when the Biden DOJ had all the records? They didn’t say a word about it, and now they pursue it for political purposes. Speaker 3 notes that our current president has had relationships with Epstein in the past, and mentions Katie Johnson and possibly other victims who have accused Trump of involvement in similar matters. In the speaker’s experience, Trump supporters will not listen to such claims. He admits the court of law isn’t present here. He asks if there is anything that can be said about the validity of those claims or whether more is known. Speaker 1 responds that he can say nothing at all. He states that the only thing he can say about President Trump is that in 2009, when he served subpoenas and gave notice to connected people that he wanted to talk to them, Trump was the only person who picked up the phone and said, “let’s just talk.” Trump offered as much time as needed, provided information that checked out, and helped him so they didn’t have to depose him. He adds that this occurred in 2009. Speaker 3 asks if there is any truth to James Patterson’s claims that Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago. Speaker 1 confirms that he definitely heard that.

I recently met with Donald Trump at a friend's breakfast. He did most of the talking, nothing new. He didn't ask for money or donations. I won't endorse a candidate yet, but leaning away from Biden. I won't loan him money for legal bills. If I do endorse, I'll explain why.

Transcript centers on truth and why Epstein files should be public. They note both parties avoid real reasons. Speaker 1 says the president views it as “all a trap” and that it “reminds him of Russiagate”—an attempt by Democrats to ensnare him in a fake scandal; “he's not... never did anything creepy,” the speaker says. The speaker argues transparency would have helped “the country” and “the administration,” giving it credibility. They speculate why disclosure is feared: “could it be that Trump was there and he just doesn't wanna jeopardize his presidency even putting it out there?” Epstein is described as “the center of New York society for... decades.” The claim: “I don't think having dinner at his house or even necessarily going to his island is proof of a crime.” Finally, they note “Epstein had contact with Israeli intelligence” and “British intelligence”—“probably scarier than Mossad and CIA.”

Speaker 0 emphasizes transparency and discusses a resentful exchange, then trails into a confession about past political positions. He says he tries to be as transparent as possible and offers to share what the text in court filings was. He explains that the text involved a producer and him, in January after the election, when Trump claimed the election was stolen. He says he told the White House he would believe that claim if there were verifiable evidence, and cites a specific example the White House gave: seven or eight dead people who voted, with death certificates and obituaries to prove it. He recounts that he publicly stated there was talk about election theft and that dead voters were on the rolls, naming individuals like Wanda Johnson of Sioux City, Iowa, and Jack Klein of Corpus Christi, Texas, and promising to show their obituaries. He notes that within about twenty-five minutes, CNN confirmed the deceased were not dead, exposing that he had made a colossal error on air. He emphasizes he hates being wrong and humiliated and acknowledges he did not verify the information independently and should have checked. He states he was enraged by the incident and his stance was that if someone claimed the election was stolen, they should prove it; he is an adult and does not take anyone’s word for anything, especially from campaign consultants whom he distrusts, though he still thought the claim could be verifiable. Speaker 1 asks why he did not say these things on Fox News, and he asserts he did the next day on Fox News. The conversation becomes tense as Speaker 1 challenges the sincerity and ownership of the views and statements. Speaker 0 contends there is a conversation about honesty and ownership, and asks what is being claimed. The dialogue shifts to questions about his influence and wealth. Speaker 1 questions the magnitude of his influence, implying a large net worth, suggesting he is worth around $50,000,000, which Speaker 0 rebuts with a defensive outburst. Speaker 0 denies the monetary figure and accuses Speaker 1 of being overly fixated on it, telling him to get off the internet and stop believing such numbers. The exchange grows heated and ends abruptly with Speaker 0 telling Speaker 1 to leave, and Speaker 1 attempting to interject one more time before Speaker 0 cuts off the conversation. Overall, the transcript covers: a claim of transparency; a January discussion about alleged dead-voter evidence and its on-air fallout; an apology and admission of not verifying the information; subsequent on-air correction; tensions over sincerity and ownership of views; and a confrontational exchange about influence and wealth.