reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Instead of supporting Klaus Schwab's World Economic Forum plan, focus on our country. The plan leads to serfdom and billionaires owning everything, with citizens renting based on social credit scores. One Nation opposes the great reset, digital identity bill, and land theft. We aim to restore sustainable prosperity and prioritize individuals and communities over globalist billionaires. One Nation offers a better future for Australians, united under one flag and community.

In the past, there were concerns about air pollution causing an ice age, but now the focus has shifted to global warming. The media and the United Nations have been promoting alarmist rhetoric about man-made climate change for decades. However, these predictions of doom have not come true. The purpose of this messaging is to instill fear, allowing governments to gain centralized power and control over people's actions. This serves the agenda of globalism led by the United Nations and the Chinese Communist Party, which is not in the best interest of Australia. These entities aim to control and weaken us, and that is the real emergency.

I first stumbled across agenda 21 in about 2008, and my first reaction was to dismiss what I was reading because I didn't believe that any government in Australia would take us down this road. Then I began to see a legislative pattern emerging in parliament which concerned me greatly, and I also started to see the tenor of legislation that we were passing. I did air those concerns in parliament, and it was dismissed and ignored. The words agenda 21, ladies and gentlemen, were never meant to be spoken. And if they were, then, of course, it would be dismissed as a conspiracy theory. Because if people knew agenda 21 and what it stood for, there's plenty of information out there where they could actually learn what the end game was, and governments didn't want that to be known. My dad always said to me that people only lie for two reasons. One reason is because you're ashamed of what you're doing, and the second reason is that you don't want people to be warned just before you screw them. And I honestly believe that these secrets have been kept for both of those reasons. Ladies and gentlemen, the origins of the environmental movement as we see it began back in 1968 when the Club of Rome was formed. The Club of Rome has been described as a crisis think tank which specializes in crisis creation. The main purpose of this think tank was to formulate a crisis that would unite the world and condition us to the idea of global solutions to local problems. In a document called the first global revolution authored by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider on pages 104 and 105, it stated, in searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers, of course, will be caused by human intervention that will require a global response. That's the origin of global warming, ladies and gentlemen. In 1975, Australia agreed to bring in a new economic order via the Lima Declaration on the second conference of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization. The outcome of this was, as I said, the Lima declaration which was a blueprint for the redeployment of tools, jobs, and manufacturing to the developing nations, leaving countries like Australia short of technology, a manufacturing base, and jobs. Blind Freddy can now see what the outcome of that has been for our country with their unworkable trade and tariffs agreements hand in hand with this that have followed as a matter of course. This has now become a reality with around 90% of our agriculture and manufacturing just gone. Australia signed the Lima declaration in 1975 and hundreds of others with the support of all major political players, Whitlam, Fraser, Hawke, Keating, Houston, Howard, Rudd, the democrats, the greens, and even the Nationals. It has been put to me that all of these treaties were the foundation for the rollout of agenda 21. And it seems that Australia has been moved around the global chessboard, and our so called leaders were either complicit or naive to the long term consequences. And now we're almost at checkmate. Sorry. In 1992, former president of The United States George Bush senior said, effective execution of agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of human society unlike anything the world has ever experienced. A major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action will be integrated into individual and collective decision making at every level. Cutting through the code, I want everyone here tonight not familiar with agenda 21 to consider what the words profound reorientation of all human society and unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources actually means. For everyone here tonight not familiar with agenda 21, I would suggest that this is the beginning of your learning curve, not the end. In 1992, Morris Strong, secretary general of the UN Earth Summit and member of the Club of Rome said, it is clear the current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, ownership of motor vehicles, small electrical appliances, home and workplace air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable. Put those statements together with the previous one, and it must become clear that agenda 21 is about controlling every aspect of our lives, how we eat, what we eat, how much we eat, how we move around, food production, the amount of food, and where we even live. Dixie Ray, former Washington state governor and assistant secretary for oceans and international environmental and scientific affairs stated, agenda 21 seeks to establish a mechanism for transferring the wealth from citizens to the third world. Fear of environmental crisis would be used to create a world government and UN central direction. From a report in the September Habitat One Conference, land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument

Western nations face a unique threat: conquest not through hostile invasion, but through invitation by a corrupt elite. This elite is actively inviting the "invader" and forcing the native population to fund their own demise. The speaker urges immediate action to defend the continent, religion, people, and countries. Failure to do so will mark this era as the time when Western nations were conquered by invitation, facilitated and financed by a corrupt elite.

Migrants and refugees are welcome here. There is no easy way forwards. The threat to the places we love comes not from people arriving on small boats. It comes from an economic system that sucks money from people and places who need it. And it comes from a politics that tries to divide us and point the finger at each other rather than the billionaires. This is a nation of neighbors. We have to do things better, and we will. There is a clear path here. If reform can rocket through the pulse with a politics of despair, then it's time for the Green Party to do the same thing, but with a politics of hope.

The speaker claims that every Canadian prime minister has been compromised by agents of influence working for Chinese intelligence. This poses a significant security risk, raising concerns about who is truly in control of the country. They suggest the need for an independent investigation to protect against future threats, citing Australia's law against foreign interference as a model to follow.

The speaker discusses the economic and property disasters caused by the Chinese Communist Party. They mention how Australia has experienced unexpected financial crises due to their dependence on China. The speaker also talks about China's control over Australia's industries and how they view Australia as a tribute. In contrast, the speaker mentions how the UK does not take China seriously. They emphasize that the Chinese Communist Party's arrogance and confidence come from their control over people and institutions. The speaker also mentions their personal connections and influence over various individuals and departments in different countries. They claim that China's economic and property issues are a cover-up to hide the truth and that eliminating corruption is the only way to reveal the real situation.

Australia is vulnerable to external changes due to its decency and compassion, mirroring the US experience where good qualities were leveraged for societal change. Australia's deep reserves of energy and minerals make it a target for countries like China, which has a large population and growing economy but lacks resources. China won't invade militarily but will subvert Australia by buying off politicians and using mass immigration to dilute national identity and create chaos. The speaker claims the Australian government has been bought off by China, evidenced by high immigration rates that strain resources and erode the sense of national unity. Land acknowledgements, the trans agenda, and the green agenda are framed as tools to destabilize the country and facilitate a takeover. The speaker suggests Australia needs leaders who prioritize the country's interests above all else and are willing to fight entrenched power, even at great personal cost.

An entire native population, regardless of race, is being systematically disenfranchised. Middle-class Americans are losing both economic and political power, exacerbated by mass immigration. The leaders responsible for these changes show no empathy for those affected, often blaming the country for its struggles. This cycle of harm leads to resentment towards the very people they hurt. Acknowledging this reality is essential, and it will continue to be voiced openly.

Nations are shaped by their populations. A country with hardworking individuals who share common values tends to be prosperous, while one lacking these traits may struggle. The U.S. is experiencing rapid change due to mass immigration, which many citizens did not vote for, undermining democracy. Currently, immigrants from over 160 countries are crossing the southern border, with record numbers of apprehensions daily. Many are unlikely to return home, leading to a collapse of the rule of law. In contrast, Poland has maintained strict immigration policies, resulting in safety and economic growth. The Polish government prioritizes its citizens' well-being and rejects illegal immigration, emphasizing the importance of national identity and security. The message is clear: to protect their countries, leaders must be brave and uphold their values against external pressures.

To ensure social cohesion, newcomers to Australia should adhere to Australian norms or not be allowed to live there. Multiculturalism has failed because it allows immigrants to assimilate on their own terms, leading to isolated communities and empowering radical Islam. Radical Islam is an international ideology aiming to establish Sharia law and a caliphate worldwide. Islamist movements, now banned in many original Islamic countries, have migrated to Western societies, using freedoms of religion and speech to advance their goals. These groups have established infrastructure, including mosques and schools, to Islamize communities. To counter this, the speaker suggests emphasizing national unity, dismantling Islamist infrastructure, and deporting radical imams. Muslim citizens should choose allegiance to Australia or return to their country of origin.

Australia's voice to parliament resolution, supported by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, aimed to bring reconciliation with indigenous people by changing the constitution. It proposed returning 80% of land to indigenous people, establishing a controlled parallel parliament, and reallocating land and assets to transnational globalists. The resolution was defeated, but the globalist agenda to decolonize nations persists. The UN and figures like Klaus Schwab advocate for similar measures worldwide. This plan threatens farmlands, rural regions, forests, coastlines, riverways, resources, livestock, and private land rights. The goal is to impose egalitarianism, resulting in global poverty and enslavement. The connection to George Soros and the open southern border in America is implied.

Western financial institutions have invested heavily in China's real estate market, relying on fake data. The CCP's influence in Australia's economy through corrupt businesses poses a threat. The CCP controls the world financially, manipulating countries and individuals to serve its interests. China's economic collapse could lead to the downfall of the CCP and expose its wrongdoings.

Australia is vulnerable to outside influence due to its decency and compassion, qualities that are being leveraged against it. The country is under attack in a similar way to the speaker's own, through a simple formula of using its best qualities against itself. Australia's deep reserves of energy and essential minerals make it a target for countries like China, which has a large population and growing economy but lacks sufficient resources. China won't invade militarily but will subvert Australia by buying off politicians and using mass immigration to create chaos and eliminate social cohesion. The speaker claims the government has been bought off, evidenced by the high levels of immigration. Land acknowledgements, the trans agenda, and the green agenda are all tactics used to sow chaos and undermine the country's foundations. The solution is for Australia to find leaders who prioritize the country's interests above all else, even at great personal cost.

Australia is vulnerable to external changes due to its decency and compassion. These qualities are being leveraged to subvert the country, similar to what happened in the speaker's own country. Australia's vast reserves of energy and essential minerals make it a target for countries like China, which has a large population and growing economy but lacks sufficient resources. China won't invade militarily but will undermine Australia through subversion, buying off politicians, and mass immigration. The high levels of immigration strain resources and erode national cohesion, creating societal divisions. "Land acknowledgements," the "trans agenda," and the "green agenda" are tactics used to sow chaos and weaken the country. The speaker urges Australians to elect leaders who prioritize the country's interests and are willing to fight against these forces, even at great personal cost. The speaker admires Australia and hopes it can find such a leader to protect its unique qualities.

The speakers discuss what they describe as a global rise in Islamist-linked threats and the impact of migration on security in Western countries. They begin by asserting that France’s government can no longer keep its own people safe from “potential radical Islamic terrorists that they have welcomed into their country,” and claim that France has allowed so many Middle East and North African migrants that crowds can no longer be assembled. They extend the concern to other Western nations, stating that the threat is now widespread, including in Germany, where they say many people are afraid to attend famous Christmas markets because they have become highly dangerous targets for radical Islamists. Speaker 1 provides details: since 2014, seven European Christmas markets have been attacked—three in France and four in Germany. Authorities arrested five men suspected of planning attack number eight in Germany last week; among them is described as a Muslim cleric from a German mosque who allegedly urged his followers to kill as many people as possible. The report notes that an attack in Poland on a Christmas market was foiled as well. The German case is characterized as a migrant who came from Egypt, moved to Germany, and, according to the speakers, worked at a mosque in a country they describe as tolerantly allowing him to operate there. They claim this individual began indoctrinating other Muslims to murder Christians. They describe attending a German Christmas market at this point as akin to playing Russian roulette, expressing fear that an asylum seeker living on tax dollars could drive a car into a market and kill many people. The speakers reference Australia, stating that 16 people were murdered on a beach “this past Sunday,” and claim that there is a heightened threat as their government imported tens of thousands of migrants from Muslim-majority countries, with the Muslim population purportedly doubling in a decade. They criticize Australia’s Labour Party as “left-wing,” asserting it has “the strictest gun laws in the world” yet intends to add more, while instructing viewers to light a candle as a symbolic response. They describe the current government as being led by people who are detached from reality and who prioritize political orthodoxies over people’s lives, claiming that the media feeds the same narratives and spin. Speaker 2 endorses a symbolic action: “Light a candle. Put it in their front window tonight at 06:47PM to show that light will indeed defeat darkness.” They state that a national cabinet meeting will consider a proposal to empower agencies to examine what can be done in this area. Overall, the dialogue emphasizes a narrative of increasing Islamist terrorism linked to migrant populations in Europe and Australia, argues for stronger security measures and altered political responses, and frames mainstream reporting as insufficient.

China is using green technology to make the United States and other developed countries dependent on them. They expect Western countries to reduce fossil fuel emissions and go green, while they themselves don't take responsibility for historic global warming. This strategy is dishonest and subverts the United States' national security by making it reliant on China for energy. Wind, solar, and electric vehicles all rely on rare earth minerals, which China controls. They have no environmental regulations and process the majority of rare earths. China is also the sole producer of refined graphite used in EV batteries. Despite this dependence, politicians are pushing for green mandates without considering the implications of relying on China. This situation is frustrating and puts the US at risk of being owned by China.

Societies can get caught up in obsessions, like reporting neighbors during lockdown. Fear led to blind acceptance of mainstream narratives. Emphasis on vaccines over natural immunity neglected. Government messaging induced anxiety, neglecting health basics. Politicians portrayed as saviors from a powerful virus. Education didn't always correlate with critical thinking. Real risks overlooked by those in privileged positions. Restoration of a healthy, strong Australia will take time. Translation: Societies can become obsessed with certain ideas, like reporting neighbors during lockdowns. Fear led to unquestioning belief in mainstream narratives. Emphasis on vaccines neglected natural immunity. Government messaging induced anxiety, neglecting basic health needs. Politicians portrayed themselves as saviors from a powerful virus. Education didn't always lead to critical thinking. Real risks were overlooked by those in privileged positions. Restoring a healthy, strong Australia will take time.

To destroy a country from within, one would target its foundations, not its military. This involves crippling its energy sector, making power expensive and unreliable, and decimating manufacturing to eliminate self-reliance. Housing would become unattainable for young families. Cultural identity would be erased, patriotism labeled as hate, and the job market flooded under the guise of economic growth. Families would be bankrupted by the rising cost of living and gaslit into believing they deserve it. This isn't hypothetical; it's claimed to be happening in Australia. The speaker asserts that every pillar of the nation is being dismantled deliberately, not by accident or incompetence.

A Trump victory signals change, particularly in addressing censorship. Meanwhile, Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is pushing a bill that threatens free speech, criminalizing dissent against the government. This authoritarian legislation mirrors previous warnings about the rise of a zero trust model, with measures like mandatory ID linking for social media use. The government is overstepping parental rights, claiming it will care for children instead. Australians must pressure politicians to uphold their rights and reject this bill entirely, rather than seeking amendments. The focus should be on restoring freedoms and ensuring that politicians serve the public, not control it. Support minor parties opposing this bill and advocate for a bill of rights to prevent future authoritarianism. It’s time for Australians to reclaim their country.