reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The transcript discusses several intertwined points about the FDA's funding, information sources, and a personal health journey. It states that the FDA gets 47% of its funding from the pharmaceutical industry, and that this information was released only after a rumor claimed 50% of their funding came from big pharma. The speaker notes, “the people that you’re supposed to be making rules and regulations for are the same people that are paying you money,” describing this as a conflict of interest and urging readers to consider the implication of funding influencing regulatory decisions. The speaker then shifts to their personal experience with health issues and the challenge of finding valid information that isn’t paid for by big pharma. They share a statistic attributed to women with similar issues: “85 to ninety percent of the women who experience the same issues that I experience notice changes in their symptoms or alleviation completely from their symptoms simply by changing their diet, namely going gluten free.” Although the speaker says they personally are not inclined to adopt gluten-free changes, they are cutting out refined carbs and sugars from their diet and report progress: “I've been on this diet for two days now, and I already feel a ton different.” This personal anecdote is presented in the context of comparing diet-driven symptom changes to pharmaceutical influence. The speaker mentions ongoing changes to their living space and routines as part of their broader stance. They say, “we're putting up our squat rack again in our home gym,” signaling a strengthening or lifestyle shift. They also report, “we did get some egg laying birds,” suggesting new household activities. Throughout, there is a reiterated sentiment directed at big pharma: “basically saying a big to big pharma,” underscoring their stance against pharmaceutical influence. Finally, the speaker emphasizes the surprising nature of the 47% funding figure and reiterates, “I still can't believe it's 47% of their funding, and they think that's okay.” They invite audience engagement, closing with, “as always, I look forward to hearing your thoughts about all of this down below.”

The speaker accuses the Gates Foundation of making millions of dollars from vaccines and then changing their narrative about their effectiveness. They criticize Bill Gates for profiting from lies and question his philanthropic image. The speaker also highlights Gates' history as a businessman and suggests that he lacks the expertise to advocate for medical interventions. They find it shocking how transparent the situation is, with no attempt to hide the financial motivations involved.

I asked SHAT GBT about pharmaceutical profits from children transitioning. Estimates range from $195 million to $885 million annually. This suggests a financial motive for big pharma to promote early transitions in children.

A clinician explains that a chart could show a 15 year old female with a testosterone deficiency, but 'it's a boy that has a testosterone deficiency' and that 'testosterone ... doesn't raise any red flags.' An insurance claim showing 'a boy who has a testosterone deficiency on paper' can obscure fraud. The speaker calls the pattern the 'unholy trinity'—'The hospital system, the pharmaceutical industry, and health insurance companies.' Regarding drugs, puberty blockers 'was Lupron is the most common one,' plus testosterone and estrogen. Some of these drugs are used to chemically castrate sex offenders, and there are children with health issues who need them. There are lack of safeguards: Medicaid and similar insurers 'don't have a system in place where they verify to make sure this is correct before they reimburse.' There should be oversight. 'They actually put the sex they want to be, not the sex they are.'

Money is the devil's tool to make people do evil. Terms like "gender affirming care" change the narrative, but the result is profiting off people's confusion. Gender affirming care is child sacrifice. Children commit suicide because they went through this care, are depressed, don't have breasts, can't have children, and are confused. This is a form of child sacrifice for financial gain, not to gods or demons, but to money.

Big pharma will likely profit significantly from this medication, which is intended for long-term or potentially lifelong use.

The speaker expresses concern about the potential negative effects of injections on hormones, attachment, desire, family life, and normal growth. They also mention the potential damage to reproductive organs. The speaker then briefly mentions how to contact them and asks for support. They mention having 14,000 copies of a book available on Amazon. The transcript ends with a mention of Naomi Wolf being in the capital and a mention of a short commercial.

The speaker says some states, like California and Washington, may take children from parents who oppose gender-affirming care. They believe the trans issue played a significant role in the last election, particularly an ad criticizing Kamala Harris's stance. They claim Harris had little room to push back because gender-affirming care was mandated under a lawsuit settlement during her time as Attorney General. The speaker finds the issue of gender-affirming care for children, especially regarding age, to be complex. They admit the trans issue is relatively new to them, and they are still trying to understand aspects like pronouns. They recall an experience where their Hispanic chief of staff strongly advised against using the term "Latinx." They note that post-George Floyd and post-COVID, there was a push for more sensitivity in language and a rise in discussions around gender-affirming care, but the science around it seems contradictory.

Speaker 0 describes a study on the hepatitis B vaccine, stating it is loaded with mercury during the first thirty days of life and comparing infants who received it in that period to those who did not or who received it later. He claims that the relative risk of smoking a pack a day for twenty years leading to lung cancer is ten, with a figure of 11.35, and attributes this to Thimerosal. Speaker 1 asks if the claim is about Thimerosal, and Speaker 0 confirms, then recounts a story that motivated his involvement: a “secret meeting” held to avoid on-campus exposure to freedom of information requests. The meeting occurred at Simpson Wood, a remote Methodist retreat center on the Chattahoochee River in Norcross, Georgia. Over two days, 52 attendees included major vaccine companies, regulatory agencies (WHO, CDC, FDA, NIH, HHS), and leaders in academic vaccinology. Megan recorded the first day, and Speaker 0 says he obtained the transcripts in 2005, calling them horrific. He invites listeners to read them on the Children’s Health Events site to judge for themselves, arguing the transcripts reveal “panjarums of the American healthcare system” and that regulators claimed the science was bulletproof while suggesting vaccines cause autism. Speaker 1 notes that Speaker 0 has previously claimed the conference revealed that vaccines cause autism and that data should be buried, referencing a January 2011 Rolling Stone article and a Salon piece that later withdrew the article. He mentions an eighteen-month US Senate committee investigation that found allegations of CDC misconduct unsubstantiated and concluded there was no cover-up. Speaker 0 clarifies it was a two-year committee hearing led by Senator Burton at the Governmental Oversight Committee, and asserts that vaccines do cause autism, while encouraging listeners to research the science themselves rather than trust him or the organizations cited. Speaker 0 then attacks the credibility and funding of CDC, NIH, and the American Academy of Pediatrics, claiming they are “bought and paid for,” with statistics he cites: FDA is funded 45% by the pharmaceutical industry; the AAP allegedly gets 80% of its money from industry; and the CDC spends 4,900,000,000 of its 12,000,000,000 annual budget. Speaker 1 pushes back by noting that parents within these organizations vaccinate their own children against vaccines that include thimerosal, asking rhetorically whether they are willingly harming their children, and suggesting a broader government conspiracy. Speaker 0 then directs Speaker 1 to the movie Dopesick for further context, contrasting it with opioid prescriptions, and asserts that doctors treated patients and their own children with opioids because they believed FDA guidance. Overall, the dialogue centers on thimerosal in early vaccines, alleged hidden meetings and data suppression, controversial media coverage of vaccines-autism links, and critical claims about regulatory agency funding and conduct, culminating in comparisons to pharmaceutical and medical industry dynamics.

The speaker aims to expose the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) and corporations working with them to enforce "woke" policies. They claim the HRC pushes far-left policies, such as requiring companies to cover transition care for children where legal, to achieve high scores in their corporate scoring system. A video clip featuring the HRC president is presented, where Donald Trump is accused of hating America, wanting to ban books, break up marriages, and bully trans kids, and being a "34 time felony convicted wannabe white nationalist dictator". The speaker infers that companies partnering with the HRC endorse these views. The HRC president is also shown using the term "pregnant people," which the speaker interprets as an indication that the HRC believes men can have babies. The speaker criticizes the HRC's stance on abortion and sex changes for children, and highlights companies like American Airlines, Apple, Match, Macy's, Lyft, Lexus, and Disney for their association with the HRC. The speaker urges companies to drop "woke" policies, DEI programs, and partisan activism, and adopt neutrality to avoid alienating customers and harming their bottom line.

The speaker highlights the negative outcomes and side effects of hormone medications used by transgender individuals. They mention that these medications can lead to disease states and adverse consequences. The transgender population has a shorter lifespan compared to the general population due to these medical problems. They also mention that transgender individuals become sterile and sexually incompetent, as their organs are affected by cross-sex hormones. Brain development in adolescence is adversely affected, and bone density is compromised, leading to frequent fractures in adulthood. The speaker argues that if these individuals had received counseling and followed the international standard of care, these diseases could have been avoided.

The speaker suggests that pharmaceutical companies want people to continuously take vaccines, even as they become sicker. They claim that these companies also acquire drugs to treat the injuries caused by the vaccines. For example, before rolling out COVID-19 vaccines for children, one of the companies acquired drugs to treat blood clots in children, which they believe the vaccines may cause. The speaker also mentions a large acquisition by Pfizer for novel cancer treatments, implying that they will cause the cancers they treat. The speaker concludes that pharmaceutical companies want people to be sick and dependent on their medications.

The speaker states they decided to break the system, referring to drug companies, which they describe as the most powerful lobby in the world with tremendous power over the Senate, the House, governors, and everybody. The speaker notes that drug companies spend billions of dollars. The speaker claims they don't care and have to do what's right.

Outside Stonewall National Monument, Chris says, 'this is where the whole gay rights movement began.' He adds, 'This whole trans business, right, trans kids on top of that, it's a crime.' He notes, 'the same NGOs... won their gay rights. Really around 02/2010, 02/2015, all across the West.' He states, 'Trans people don't exist. Okay. Men and women, boys and girls.' He warns that 'tens of thousand kids are being irreparably physically harmed' and that 'puberty blockers are all about blocking puberty, which occurs with children, so they should never get it.' He cites, 'WPATH is a big part of it for sure' and 'They write what are called the standards of care.' He points to funding by 'USAID... billions of dollars overseas to proliferate this throughout the world' and to online 'Tumblr, TikTok, Reddit' as vectors. He notes '28 states have legislated a ban on this.'

The speaker accuses the Ellen Melinda Gates Foundation of profiting millions of dollars from vaccines. They claim that once the foundation sold their stock, the narrative changed to downplay the effectiveness of vaccines and the severity of the virus. The speaker believes this is motivated by money and criticizes the foundation for promoting vaccines despite not being experts in the field. They also mention the foundation's history with monopolistic practices. The speaker finds it shocking how transparent the situation is, with the money trail easily traceable.

Transgender Inc., the market for sex reassignment surgeries and hormone replacement therapies, is a lucrative industry worth billions of dollars. The number of transgender individuals has doubled in the past decade, with over 1.6 million in the United States alone. However, there is a lack of long-term studies on the efficacy and consequences of these procedures and pharmaceutical products, especially for minors. The medical community, influenced by organizations like WPATH, has shifted the perception of transgenderism from a mental illness to a subjective reality that can be affirmed through surgeries and drugs. The profit-driven nature of this industry, coupled with the cultural and political push for transgender acceptance, has led to a lack of critical examination and oversight.

Transgender Inc., the market for sex reassignment surgeries and hormone replacement therapies, is a lucrative industry worth billions of dollars. The number of transgender individuals has doubled in the past decade, with over 1.6 million in the United States alone. However, there is a lack of long-term studies on the efficacy and consequences of these procedures and pharmaceutical products, especially for minors. The medical community, influenced by organizations like WPATH, has embraced transgenderism as a political and advocacy movement. The profit-driven nature of the industry, coupled with the cultural and ideological shift towards subjective reality, has led to the rapid growth of transgenderism. The involvement of pharmaceutical companies, health systems, and corporate America further perpetuates this trend.

The speaker claims that those who oppose the pharmaceutical industry are punished, while those who support it, like Anthony Fauci, rise to the top. Fauci, who has been in his position for 50 years, is highly paid and serves the agency's ambition. The speaker accuses the National Institutes of Health (NIH) of abandoning its mission to understand why Americans are sick and instead focusing on developing drugs for profit. The NIH earns billions of dollars from the Moderna vaccine, with Fauci's employees benefiting from patents and royalties. The speaker suggests that the agency's commercial interests have overshadowed its regulatory responsibilities.

Speaker 0: It is a report that concludes that The United States official foreign policy signed into law in 1975 by president Ford, and when I say signed into law, it's called a presidential directive, is the reduction of population in 12 foreign twelve twelve specific foreign countries. Not the control of population, the reduction of population. And so it explains the ways we're gonna do this is through medicalizing birth control, never was before. You didn't need a doctor to get a condom, and to go around and talk to villages everywhere and say, you want a reproductive health freedom, don't you? You know what most women want on the planet Earth? Babies. They're they're not looking for reproductive health freedom was a term for have fewer babies. Right? There is a very potent move in official US foreign policy to reduce population in other countries. Now why? Philippines or or Indonesia. Why? They state it directly in the Kissinger report because it's classified. They wanted to reduce those countries' development so that they wouldn't need their own raw materials because we want them, the metals, etcetera. It is dark as shit, the Kissinger reports. It's not and it's not classified anymore. You can, you know, ask chat GPT about it to give you quotes from it. And so this whole business of population reduction is now another third rail I'm stepping on. Right? Nobody wants it. What are you you're nuts. No. A lot of people want it. A lot of people believe, obviously, Bill Gates, that 8,000,000,000 people was the number where we must turn it around, which is where we are supposedly now. And the Kissinger report, I was a kid. I didn't write it. I didn't make it up. You can find it on Wikipedia. It's a real thing. And all the presidential directives that came from it. Would these countries like the idea that we show up and we say, hey. We've got a new tetanus vaccine for you, but it happens to also have in it secretly something that will reduce fertility in your women as we did in India, as we did in Peru. In both India and Peru, we also did forced sterilization surgeries. US paid for them. True story. Speaker 1: So the the one vaccine was the DTP vaccine. Is that what it was? Speaker 0: The the one I'm talking about. The the Speaker 1: the The one that had h c g in it? It was just tetanus. But there was a vaccine that was in Bobby Kennedy's book Yeah. Where they were talking about women in Africa, where they were unknowingly given Yeah. This vaccine against That's that's diphtheria, tetanus, and Speaker 0: Well, it was the tetanus part Right. That that they were that they were pitching. And by the way, tetanus is a challenge in those countries more than it is in The United States. But, yeah, they were call they were naming them wellness drugs. Speaker 1: And they had h c g Speaker 0: in it. That's correct. Speaker 1: And that h c g, and they were more administered to women than they were to men. Speaker 0: Oh, of course. And they were five. They would administer administer five of the injections. Speaker 1: And they did it under this the guys were the the the narrative was that women were more vulnerable. So you have to give the vaccination to women. Yeah. And it was preventing them from getting pregnant. Speaker 0: It was preventing them from getting pregnant, and they had World Health Organization, which basically has this as a mission. Man, I wish they would sue me for saying this, but they they have this as a mission, which is population reduction from the beginning. They had worked on that HCG. Speaker 1: There's Gates famously, Speaker 0: of course, Speaker 1: in the speech saying Speaker 0: We can do that with vaccines. Speaker 0: Yeah. By the way, in the Kissinger report, for those of you not seeing this and only hearing it, that was me drinking my pause was me drinking water. I did not have a stroke. In the Kissinger report, they list the strategies and how much funding they'll give to each strategy. One of the strategies is to medicalize birth control, meaning have trusted people in the villages, etcetera. Another one is to pay young men to have a vasectomy. Just outright pay you know, write a check-in villages so they get $60 and they get a nice weekend of buying beer, but they never have kids. But another one of them is injections that reduce that temporarily reduce male fertility. Now here's an interesting thing about that one. It's in the Kissinger report. Injections that temporarily reduce male fertility. The COVID vaccine reduces sperm count in men for three months admitted by Fauci. It's not a secret. But the CDC's response was, yeah, but it's only for three months. And But they were asking us to take one every fucking three months. Well, also the miscarriages. Miscarriages and stillbirths. My point is that it's no it's no surprise that these persistent thoughts that I think good people believe meaning, I think there are good people who believe that population reduction is important. The fact is, of course, that now we are barely at replacement, you know, at replacement value right now in terms of many populations.

Planned Parenthood is reportedly becoming a top provider of puberty blockers to teenagers in America after the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Almost 12,000 teenagers aged 12-17 have allegedly been treated with puberty blockers or "pro trans counseling" by Planned Parenthood, often with no prior history of gender dysphoria or medical diagnosis. Detransitioners' stories are exposing the alleged inadequacy of Planned Parenthood's counseling. One woman, Helena Kirschner, was allegedly given four times the typical starting dose of testosterone hormone replacement therapy by a nurse practitioner in under an hour. Another woman, Pat Katzen, allegedly received a testosterone prescription after a 30-minute phone call with a Planned Parenthood doctor. Given Planned Parenthood's influence on sex education curriculum and its $700 million in annual taxpayer funding, the speaker suggests the organization is running a "pyramid scheme" to indoctrinate children into believing they were "born in the wrong body" and then prescribe them medication.

According to the speaker, 50% of pediatricians' revenue comes from vaccines, with insurance companies like Blue Cross offering bonuses for high vaccination rates, potentially influencing doctors' recommendations. The speaker claims that pediatricians may dismiss families who want alternative vaccine schedules to protect these bonuses. The speaker alleges that 80% of doctors now work for corporations focused on revenue over patient care, creating pressure to generate funds due to medical school debt. The speaker suggests the entire system is incentivized to keep people sick, not necessarily deliberately, but through financial incentives. Insurance companies allegedly profit more from a sick population because they collect money as friction, taking a cut of revenues. The speaker claims that doctors, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies also benefit financially from people being sick, creating systemic pressure regardless of individual intentions.

BlackRock is allegedly mutilating children for profit through their ownership of Eli Lilly, a health care company specializing in gender affirming care for minors. This care purportedly includes surgical procedures on children as young as 10 who identify as the opposite gender. BlackRock has allegedly profited $771,000,000 from holding Eli Lilly stock over the past five years. The speaker intends to invest in stocks held by BlackRock due to their profitability, suggesting others do the same via borgfinance.com.

Hi. I'm Robert F. Kennedy Jr, your HHS secretary. Should doctors make decisions based upon what's best for their patients or based upon what makes them the most money? It rewards certain treatments, not because they're better for the patient, but because someone profits. Take what happened during COVID. Hospitals were paid to report staff vaccination rates. We're scanning every corner of the health care system for hidden incentives at corrupt medical judgment. What we're finding is alarming. Doctors are being paid to vaccinate not to evaluate. We've recently uncovered that more than 36,000 doctors had their Medicare reimbursements altered based upon childhood vaccination rates. That's not medicine.