reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Six years ago I made a film with Kathy Newman for Channel 4 called The Prince and the Pedophile about Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew. In the wake of that film, I had lengthy telephone conversations with Virginia Roberts Giuffre (Virginia Dufry), Epstein’s best known victim, who told me all the men she was farmed out to and that it would not surprise me if President Trump was striving to protect those people. I don’t understand why the Jeffrey Epstein case would be of interest to anybody. It’s pretty boring stuff. These people who gathered around Epstein were not outlandish freaks or outcasts; they were a representative sample of the American business, political, and academic world, the American elite. It’s hardly surprising that both parties, when out of power, demand openness around this case, but when in power they are less interested in all the names. He’s dead. He’s gone. It’s all been a big hoax, perpetrated by the Democrats, with some foolish Republicans falling into the net. Epstein was very probably connected to the intelligence services, to American and possibly Israeli intelligence. He may have had compromising material tapes of powerful men, contributing to why he got away with his actions for so long. He illustrates the power, privilege, and impunity of a tiny elite of fabulously rich people who effectively run the world. Virginia was aware of Donald Trump as a sleazy presence around Epstein and moved in the same world. There was a period when they were close friends, though she was clear she was never abused by him. Virginia was recruited by Epstein while working at Mar-a-Lago. In a 2002 magazine profile, Trump called Epstein a terrific guy who likes women, many of them on the younger side. Trump and Epstein later had a falling out, but they were part of that world together. Epstein died in a prison cell. Today, Trump is president. After coming to power, Trump’s Justice Department released the Epstein papers; the released versions were heavily redacted, while the versions we had were unredacted. I have the flight logs and the little black book. Alexander Acosta, Epstein’s ally and Trump’s Labor Secretary-designate, reportedly said in hearings that Epstein belonged to intelligence and to be left alone. Epstein had connections to intelligence services, probably Mossad and American intelligence. Ghislain Maxwell’s father, Robert Maxwell, had extensive intelligence links; he was buried on the Mount of Olives, with eulogies by Israeli figures. Virginia described the abuse she suffered at Epstein’s hands and the enablers around him, including Ghislaine Maxwell, whom Virginia called “Mary fucking Poppins” and described as a sadistic abuser and facilitator. Virginia told me she was abused by a string of men Epstein presented to her, including prominent figures in business and politics and, obviously, Prince Andrew and world leaders. The number of them who were sadomasochistic was extraordinary; one man nearly killed her. She was angry watching Prince Andrew’s interview, angered by his arrogance and belief he would get away with it. I can tell you categorically I don’t remember meeting her; there are questions about a doctored photograph. Epstein’s smirking was noted by someone who knew him, as if he knew things others didn’t. The Little Black Book was Ghislain Maxwell’s book, as evidenced by the British numbers versus American numbers, with many entries overlapping with the flight logs. Epstein referred to Peter Mandelson as “Petey,” and Mandelson is one of the two pictured with Epstein in a casual outing and at Epstein’s birthday. There is no suggestion Mandelson was criminally involved, but he was seen in Epstein’s circle, presenting a mysterious closed world of power. Epstein’s death has raised questions about surveillance footage; three minutes are missing from the prison surveillance released by the American government. Epstein, a former Bear Stearns employee and later involved in a pyramid scheme with Steve Hoffenberg, moved into advising Les Wexner and other ventures. He received a sweetheart deal in Florida in 2006–2007, serving about a year with day release, and only faced justice again in 2019. Epstein’s circle largely walked away unscathed. Virginia’s case did not progress in the UK; Prince Andrew was reportedly settled for about £12,000,000 to Virginia’s charity, a sum funded ultimately by the public. Virginia’s recent death involved a car accident and divorce troubles; conspiracies surround her death, though her family sees nothing suspicious. Virginia’s experiences, and the stories of Epstein, Maxwell, and others, highlight the power and privilege of the wealthy and privileged, and the need for independent media outlets like Double Dan News, which I urge you to support via Patreon.

Newly unsealed court documents reveal incriminating blackmail videos involving Jeffrey Epstein, Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, and Richard Branson with women. Epstein recorded these encounters and the women involved also have copies. The FBI is under pressure to release the footage, but there is a plea not to do so as no one wants to see those tapes.

The conversation centers on the ongoing examination of Jeffrey Epstein’s files and what they reveal, with a focus on disturbing content, coded language, and the reliability of the material. - The speakers note the FBI’s earlier claim that there was no sex trafficking, calling that claim gaslighting given the scale of material now public. They emphasize the last four file dumps as “unbelievable” in their volume and in the disturbing, often coded language contained within. - They discuss how widespread Epstein’s influence appears to be, noting that Epstein’s activities touch many high-profile figures across politics and business. Names that repeatedly surface include former president Bill Clinton (clearly named in one journal entry) and former president Donald Trump (referenced repeatedly, sometimes with redactions that leave the identity ambiguous). Other figures mentioned include Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, and Ivanka Trump, among others. They point out that some references are explicit, while others are obfuscated or redacted. - A central feature of the material is the use of code words to describe sexual abuse and trafficking. The participants give several examples: - The journal of a 16-year-old Epstein trafficking victim uses coded language; words like “yucky,” “gross,” and other terms are interpreted by an attorney as code for sexual assault. The journal explicitly mentions Chelsea Clinton in one passage and references to Bill Clinton, with the implication of inappropriate acts. - “Pizza” is repeatedly identified as a common code word in emails and journals, linked by some to the broader Pizza Gate lore, and sometimes paired with “grape soda” or “beef jerky” as coded references. They note that “pizza” appears over 900 times in some files, and “grape soda” is mentioned in the context of sexual references or secret messages. - The reliability and credibility of victims’ accounts are discussed. The 16-year-old victim’s journals include extraordinary claims (for example, about having Epstein’s child), and the speakers acknowledge that some allegations are “out outrageous” and may be difficult to corroborate. They stress the need for more forensic verification to determine what is authentically attributable to the victim and what may be embellishment or misinterpretation. They mention claims that a baby allegedly connected to Ghislain Maxwell and Epstein existed, but note that there is no independent corroboration of a child, while other entries discuss the possibility of egg freezing and related issues. - Redactions are scrutinized. Some names are clearly identifiable (e.g., Clinton, Chelsea), while others (including a Trump-related item) are redacted or partially disclosed. The hosts suggest the redactions may reflect AI-assisted and manual redaction, with some omissions caused by the sheer volume of material and potential misses during processing. They acknowledge that some files were removed after the initial release due to redaction errors, which complicates interpretation. - The discussion moves to Epstein’s personal network and possible roles as a liaison or intelligence asset. They observe Epstein’s connections to Middle Eastern figures and governments, including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE, and speculate about possible associations with Mossad, Saudi intelligence, and other agencies. They discuss Epstein’s travel history, mentions of forged or fake passports, and the possibility that he might have contemplated operating outside the United States. - The material includes extensive photographic and video evidence. The speakers remark on the sheer number of images and videos, the presence of many well-known individuals in Epstein’s orbit, and body-language cues suggesting Epstein treated others as objects for his pleasure. They note that even after his 2008 conviction, Epstein remained photographed in public settings, implying ongoing power dynamics and influence. - The possibility that Epstein is alive is entertained, sparked by references to a possible escape plan and by discussion of questions around his death. They analyze a document scribbled in jail that the speaker interprets as an escape plan, including references to red notices, visas, banks, and “blackmail,” and discuss the idea that the death could have been staged or influenced by external actors. They contrast this with official accounts that describe Epstein’s death as suicide, while acknowledging inconsistencies in the DOJ and inspector general reports, and noting new observations such as delayed camera activity and reports of document shredding. - They conclude that the scope of material is enormous (tens of thousands to millions of pages, images, and videos), with three point something million released out of six point something million known to exist. They caution that the released files likely represent the tip of the iceberg and emphasize the value of collaboration among investigators, journalists, and researchers to parse the data. - Throughout, Epstein’s associates—including Maxwell and high-profile figures in politics and entertainment—are repeatedly examined in terms of possible roles, affiliations, and complicity, alongside broader questions about intent, corroboration, and the interpretation of coded language within the files.

Thousands of Jeffrey Epstein documents were released by the Department of Justice overnight, including emails never seen before, in the largest dump to date. The new material includes investigative documents and an email from the day after Epstein’s arrest in 2019, in which an unidentified person at the New York FBI field office asks for an update on the status of 10 coconspirators. A July DOJ memo states there was not enough evidence to prosecute any uncharged third parties, with Ghislain Maxwell identified as the only person charged as an Epstein coconspirator. Other emails show prosecutors repeatedly pressing to interview former Prince Andrew, who provided a written statement but never sat down with investigators. Another email, from a federal prosecutor in Maxwell’s 2020 case, notes flight records reflecting that Donald Trump traveled on Epstein’s private jet many more times than previously reported or known, including during the period prosecutors expected to charge in a Maxwell case. It is noted that Trump and Epstein had a decades-long friendship but had a falling out in the early 2000s after Epstein allegedly stole Már-a Lago employees. Also included are photos of an Austrian passport bearing Epstein’s picture but with the alias Marius Fortellmi. The release comes as the DOJ faces pressure from bipartisan lawmakers and Epstein survivors after missing a legal deadline to release all Epstein files last Friday. President Trump commented yesterday on dozens of photos released in prior document dumps, including at least one featuring Trump himself and several featuring former president Bill Clinton. Both Trump and Clinton have denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes. Clinton issued a statement accusing the DOJ of using selective releases of Epstein documents to imply wrongdoing where there isn’t, challenging the department to immediately release any remaining materials mentioning or showing Bill Clinton in these files. What has been released thus far represents only a fraction of the hundreds of thousands of Epstein files the DOJ possesses, with promises to publish more in the coming days and weeks.

The Jeffrey Epstein documents have been released, and the mainstream media is trying to distract from the scandal by focusing on Donald Trump. However, the documents actually clear Trump of any wrongdoing. He is mentioned in the documents, but witnesses confirm that he was never present where the victims were. On the other hand, Bill Clinton is a key person in the Epstein files and is mentioned 73 times. Witnesses testify to Clinton's close relationship with Epstein and his alleged interest in young girls. Clinton participated in helicopter flights and dinner parties with young girls. While both Trump and Clinton are mentioned, Clinton is far more important in the documents.

Washington Post coverage of Trump's ties to Epstein during pageant events is described as not a fluff piece and largely anonymous. A pageant winner says Washington Post reporter Matt Fischer contacted her to learn about Trump, and she recorded the phone call. In the call, Fischer says they won't publish anything that they hear from former pageant girls that Trump treated them well during the pageant, saying flat out, if we all we have with people saying Trump was a gentleman, we wouldn't do the story. The upcoming article is said to be mostly built on anonymous sources; “we've talked to a number of people” and “it's mostly anonymous”; “we're not sort of at the point of putting people's names on things.” The interviewee notes, “Here's what the story's gonna say” and, “We need to go back to everybody and figure out, like, what they're comfortable with.” Not gonna tell you what year this pageant winner is from.

The Epstein files are detonating globally. Prince Andrew has fallen, police are searching his home, and the blast radius extends to anyone connected to Epstein or Maxwell, or even by association. High-profile figures are implicated: Larry Summers, who worked for Obama and Clinton, resigned from Harvard; Obama's top lawyer Kathy Rumler resigned from Goldman and, in emails, called Epstein “uncle Jeffrey” and advised him on press strategy; another Obama official, homeland security adviser Lisa Monaco, appears in the files. Bill Gates suddenly cancels a major overseas speech just hours before he was set to take the stage. Emails reveal meetings Gates had with Epstein after Epstein’s conviction for soliciting a minor for prostitution, and one Epstein note claimed Gates “got an STD and needed help to hide it from his wife after contact with Russian girls.” Gates denies that happened. Thomas Pritzker, JB’s cousin and a frequent guest at Epstein’s townhouse, stepped down from Hyatt Hotel’s executive chairman role. Bard College is reviewing its president’s ties to Epstein. Leon Botstein’s name appears over 2,000 times in the documents. American Express issued a statement regretting Epstein as a client after he used their card to book travel for the girls. CNN reports that new age guru Deepak Chopra might be in trouble. In 2017, Epstein asked Chopra, “did you find me a cute Israeli?” Chopra responded, “universe is human construct. Cute girls are aware when they make noises. He later added, god is a construct. Cute girls are real.” In a 01/2016 exchange beginning with a link to a TED talk about the end of physics, Chopra wrote to Epstein, “statistics is like a girl in a bikini. What she reveals is obvious. What she conceals is more interesting.” Chopra was approached at the airport and repeatedly asked about his relationship with Epstein and whether he has any regrets. Hillary knows the heat’s on, but she is on cleanup duty. Clinton-related statements claim no links beyond routine charitable travel; “we have no links. We have a very clear record that we’ve been willing to talk about, which my husband has said he took some rides on the airplane for his charitable work. I don’t recall ever meeting him.” Ghislain Maxwell wasn’t just a Clinton Global Initiative guest; she had a complimentary access pass, personally approved by Bill or Hillary, and was an honored guest in 2013, years after sexual abuse allegations circulated, and attended Chelsea’s wedding. Stephanopoulos is also scrutinized for dining at Epstein’s apartment after his prison release. Lex Wesner testified under oath that Epstein told him he worked with Bezos, the Rothschild family, and Google. New Mexico reopens its investigation into Epstein’s ranch after a newly released email claims two foreign girls were buried there, apparently dying of strangulation during rough fetish sex. The FBI was warned Epstein could be destroying evidence with an incinerator after he built a suspicious barn with a chimney. National security is involved: Epstein was offered a chance to buy buildings owned by the Pentagon, in 2016, with a go-between for Epstein and Prince Andrew pitching a site next to the Pentagon labeled a “mission critical asset.” No deal was finalized, but why was Epstein getting a pocket listing for such a sensitive site? Other files show Epstein may have compromised US customs officers in the Virgin Islands by offering them food, advice, musical gigs. How did he gain this access, and why was he operating near the national security apparatus at all?

Virginia Dufres, who co‑wrote Nobody’s Girl with journalist Amy Wallace, describes a traumatic life of abuse and trafficking linked to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, culminating in her suicide six months before this interview. The conversation discusses graphic sexual abuse in detail. Dufres’s account includes the first trip to meet Prince Andrew at Maxwell’s London home. Maxwell woke her, telling her it would be an amazing day, and Virginia was told she would meet a prince. Maxwell helped her with a passport and took her shopping; they dined, danced at Tramp’s nightclub, and returned with Virginia not in the prince’s car. Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein’s associates then told her: “you now must do for him what you do for us,” directing her to sexually service Prince Andrew. The prince denies any sexual contact and has said he has no recollection of ever meeting her. Virginia’s third encounter with Andrew involved Epstein and eight other young girls. The eight girls were reportedly supplied by Jean-Luc Brunel, a Paris modeling agent who was a close associate of Epstein, flown in to Little Saint James, Epstein’s private island. The girls did not speak English except Virginia. Virginia was told these girls had been procured by Brunel. Virginia was part of this group for an orgy, with Epstein’s fascination by sadomasochism noted by the interviewers. Virginia’s experiences included severe abuse: she was hogtied and made to crawl on the floor. While the book catalogs this pain, it also portrays Virginia as a woman who built a life after escaping, becoming a mother, and eventually deciding to come forward publicly to hold her abusers to account. She asserted that more than a dozen men, beyond Prince Andrew, trafficked her and others she knew through Epstein and Maxwell. When asked why Virginia did not name all the men in the book, Amy Wallace explains that abuse victims must weigh the costs of coming forward—privacy, safety, and the emotional toll of repeated depositions—against the goal of accountability. She notes that in the case of a former minister Virginia mentions, she feared being harmed or killed; others had threatened her with prolonged court battles if she spoke out. The interview also covers Donald Trump, whom Virginia had met at Mar-a-Lago when she was a teenager; Trump was described as kind to her in those days. Virginia had met him again during his 2016 campaign, when he pledged to release Epstein files, though specifics are not detailed here. Regarding Prince Andrew, the discussion notes his forced decision to relinquish his Duke of York title and related honors, while he still retains the titles officially. Wallace emphasizes that Virginia would view the move as a victory and a step toward accountability, though she notes Andrew’s earlier offers to aid investigators, which did not materialize. Maxwell is described as a master procurer, not merely a receptionist. The idea that she should be pardoned is rejected; Maxwell is portrayed as having targeted vulnerable girls outside private schools. Virginia Dufres’s suicide earlier in the year is acknowledged; Amy Wallace expresses sorrow and honor in speaking for her, asserting that Virginia’s book aimed to help others and to insist that powerful people cannot mistreat others with impunity. The book’s publication is framed as Virginia’s effort to galvanize accountability and change. The book is titled Nobody’s Girl. Prince Andrew, who reached a financial settlement with Virginia in 2022, has repeatedly denied wrongdoing.

The speaker discusses a major media story asserting that Donald Trump spent hours at his house with one of Epstein’s underage victims. They claim the coverage is ubiquitous across the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, and cable news, portraying the incident as a damning revelation. They argue the story’s impact is amplified by redacting the victim’s name, which they say would undermine the narrative, and claim Republicans quickly exposed the redaction. The name given is Virginia Dufry, and the speaker asserts that in depositions and in her own memoir she stated that Donald Trump never did anything wrong and was a perfect gentleman the entire time. They claim the media concealed this information and are now portraying the situation as a smoking gun that proves Trump is a pedophile, calling the media and those involved “vile” and “disgusting” for their actions.

The speaker states they had an interview with Virginia Roberts three years ago, but it was not aired. They were initially told the story was "stupid" because no one knew who Jeffrey Epstein was. The palace threatened them after finding out about Roberts' allegations regarding Prince Andrew. They feared losing access to interviews with Kate and Will, which further suppressed the story. Alan Dershowitz was also implicated. The speaker says Roberts had pictures and was in hiding for twelve years. The speaker claims they convinced her to come out and talk, and that they had information implicating Clinton, among others. They express frustration that the story is only now coming out. They also mention other women backing up Roberts' claims and Brad Edwards' assertion three years ago that Epstein was the most prolific pedophile in the country.

I'm at the airport, fresh from a White House meeting with President Trump, Vice President Vance, Attorney General Bondi, and FBI Director Patel. We were presented with a binder labeled "Epstein Files Phase One," meant to be transparent, per the President's order to declassify everything. Initially, Attorney General Bondi expected bombshells, the "dark stuff," but the binder wasn't what she anticipated. It felt incomplete. Then, late last night, a source from within the Southern District of New York (SDNY) contacted Bondi, revealing that the SDNY was concealing hundreds, maybe thousands, of additional Epstein-related documents from everyone, including the President.

The Epstein file release is a fake publicity stunt. The Trump administration invited Jewish influencers to the White House, gave them heavily redacted information already available online about a Jewish Israeli spy and pedophile, then sent these influencers out to act like something big happened. Figures like Rogan O'Hanley, Shaya Reichik, and Mike Cernovich were involved. The binders they received were full of redacted information already available online. Immediately after the event, DC Drano and Chad Prather posted identical messages on social media, praising the administration's transparency. The real reason for this charade is to avoid exposing other Jews and power players involved in the Epstein scandal. Pam Bondi, as Florida's attorney general, did nothing to prosecute Epstein because it would incriminate her associates and possibly herself.

The FBI and the Department of Justice released a two-page memo stating there is no evidence of a client list associated with Jeffrey Epstein, no evidence that anyone was blackmailed on account of such a list, and no evidence that Epstein was murdered in his Manhattan jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial. The memo supports the medical examiner’s judgment that Epstein committed suicide by hanging himself “effectively while sitting down on the floor of his cell with something tied around his neck,” a feat described as a one-of-a-kind phenomenon in suicide-watch prisoners. The FBI and DOJ also released eleven hours of videotape they say proves no one entered the cell or the area around it overnight before Epstein was found dead. The term “unresponsive” is referenced prior to a medical examiner declaring them dead. The speaker recalls that, earlier this year, when Attorney General Pam Bondi was asked about releasing the Epstein client list promised by the incoming Trump administration, she replied, “it's sitting on my desk right now for review.” The memo’s contents are portrayed as a gauntlet from those who wield power, insisting there is no list, no evidence of blackmail, and no evidence of murder, presented as conclusions rather than outcomes of evidence review. The speaker argues the point is less about truth and more about opposing disbelief of the powerful, framing it as demonstrations of naked power. The discussion references a post by Cash Patel and Dan Bongino about the Epstein client list and blackmail, noting their transition to high-profile roles and subsequent stance: no list, no blackmail, no murder. There is also mention of a public exchange between Elon Musk and Donald Trump, wherein Musk suggested real Epstein files were the reason they had not been made public; Musk later deleted the tweet, and Trump said he had cut ties with Epstein two decades ago and that Epstein’s lawyer cleared him of wrongdoing. The speaker invokes George Orwell, noting the party’s command to reject the evidence of eyes and ears, and suggests we are moving toward a post-truth world where truth is whatever the self-declared powerful say it is. The text emphasizes that, despite Epstein’s trafficking convictions and Maxwell’s conviction for trafficking underage girls, the memo asserts no guilty party existed among those connected. The speaker questions the consistency of Maxwell’s charge given the claimed absence of victims and participants. Toward the end, the speaker laments a hoped-for White House regime crumbling and questions whether recent developments are a deliberate test of loyalty to authority, implying a broader move toward a new regime’s post-truth reality, where memory and inconvenient knowledge are manipulated and “double speak” reframes war as peace and freedom as slavery. The overall arc suggests a dispiriting trend of sameness amid signals of change.

There is no client list detailing people Jeffrey Epstein trafficked. Instead, there is a redacted FBI affidavit from accusers accusing various people of improper sex. The speaker, as the former lawyer involved in investigations, knows the identities of those redacted, but claims none are public figures currently in office. Some were previously in office, and some are dead. The redactions are the result of court orders from two judges in Manhattan protecting alleged victims. Pam Bondi, the Justice Department, and Donald Trump are not responsible for these redactions, and the speaker is unaware of any undisclosed information they could release. The speaker claims the vast majority of names in the files are already public knowledge, appearing in articles and books. The speaker believes the media has not done enough to find the people already disclosed in the public record.

Epstein's connections are being removed from Bill Clinton's Wikipedia page. Initially, Epstein was mentioned 47 times, detailing their extensive relationship. However, on July 22, all references were deleted, leaving only a footnote about Jennifer Epstein. Despite numerous documented instances of Clinton's friendship with Epstein, including photographs and threats against publications discussing it, no edits have been made since the deletion. This raises questions about the timing and motivations behind removing these connections from public view. Why is this happening now?

Epstein victim Virginia Dufres new book has just dropped and it is atrocious, the details. Virginia Dufres passed away in April of a suicide. Supposed suicide, maybe an actual suicide. It's unclear. She had insisted before her death that this book came out no matter what happens to her. She wanted this book published. It is now published. She points out many very powerful people. She doesn't name very many names. In the book, she does name prince Andrew, but there's others that she just alludes to. She calls them billionaire one, billionaire two, billionaire three, a sadistic prime minister, soon to be governor of a Western US state, and a former US senator. These are the titles that she gave in the book probably to protect the publisher. So who is she talking about? It's all still kind of speculative, based on her prior accusations in unsealed Epstein documents, she talks about the sadistic prime minister. Dufres describes an unnamed prime minister who raped her, choked her unconscious, laughing as she bled. This is Ehud Barak, the former prime minister of Israel. And at the time, he was the prime minister when he was doing this. That is the allegation. Barak was a close Epstein associate. He visited Epstein's island and New York properties multiple times, flew on the Lolita Express, received millions from Epstein for a security firm. Who are the billionaires? She lists billionaire one, billionaire two, and billionaire three. Billionaire one is likely Glenn DuBen, the hedge fund billionaire and cofounder of Highbridge Capital. Dufres alleged in 2016 that she was trafficked to him for sex. He and his wife, Eva, were close Epstein friends. Billionaire two is likely Thomas Pritzker. She claimed in court filings that she was directed to have sex with him. And billionaire three is likely Leon Black. This is the private equity billionaire and Apollo Global Management cofounder. Soon to be governor of a Western state, I think that is probably Bill Richardson. New Mexico governor Bill Richardson. Dufry accused him in a 2016 deposition of having sex with her while underage. He was a former US energy secretary, UN ambassador, and frequent Epstein guest. He was often on the flight logs for the Lolita Express. The former US senator is likely George Mitchell of Maine who served between 1980 and 1995. Dufry alleged in 2016 testimony that she was directed to have sex with him. He was a frequent Epstein associate and later a Middle East peace envoy under Obama. She endured many horrors. It was absolutely terrible. Her book is atrocious. I mean, this young girl, here she is at 13 years old. This is when they snatched her up basically from Trump's Mar A Lago and used her and abused her. And everybody knew it. Everybody knew it. She was so young. This is why we want the Epstein files. We wanna know who was involved because they should be held accountable. But we also wanna know who was involved because we wanna know who's been compromised.

"The Rise and Fall of the House of York" is by a journalist Andrew Loney, about prince Andrew and his connection to Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, and Melania Trump. It contains a passage in which Epstein is quoted from a 02/2007 interview saying he had sex with Melania a full year before Donald Trump commenced his relationship with Melania. The hardcover copy, available yesterday, contains that passage, but the e-book and audio book released yesterday do not. Between printing and distribution Melania Trump started to send threatening legal letters to anyone who might connect her directly to Jeffrey Epstein. Publishers published the book and had it vetted by lawyers and decided it was legally sound. But then in the face of Melania's threats, they ran and hid. The point is panic. This is an example in which the White House is doing everything to stop it from coming out.

Speaker 0 explains that Epstein’s legal problems began with police investigations into allegations that underage women were coming to Epstein’s house. Epstein allegedly believed that Trump was the first to inform the police about what was happening at Epstein’s house, and from that point they became bitter enemies. Speaker 1 asks if this is what Epstein is telling him. Speaker 0 confirms that this is the version he is relaying, as presented by “Oh, the hoax yesterday.” Speaker 2 clarifies that “the hoax” refers to Democrats using a narrative to attack him. He says Epstein has never said or suggested or implied that the hoax is real; he has talked to Epstein many times. He states that the whole thing comes across as a hoax, not that Epstein’s actions are a hoax. He explains that Epstein believes himself innocent, and that when he first heard the rumor, he kicked him out of Maribago. He adds that Epstein was an FBI informant trying to take this matter down. The president knows and has great sympathy for the women who have suffered harms; it’s detestable to him. He and the speaker have spoken as recently as twenty-four hours ago. What he is talking about, according to Speaker 2, are the Democrats who are pursuing this with impure motives. If they truly cared, he asks, why didn’t they act during the four years of the Biden administration when the Biden DOJ had all the records? They didn’t say a word about it, and now they pursue it for political purposes. Speaker 3 notes that our current president has had relationships with Epstein in the past, and mentions Katie Johnson and possibly other victims who have accused Trump of involvement in similar matters. In the speaker’s experience, Trump supporters will not listen to such claims. He admits the court of law isn’t present here. He asks if there is anything that can be said about the validity of those claims or whether more is known. Speaker 1 responds that he can say nothing at all. He states that the only thing he can say about President Trump is that in 2009, when he served subpoenas and gave notice to connected people that he wanted to talk to them, Trump was the only person who picked up the phone and said, “let’s just talk.” Trump offered as much time as needed, provided information that checked out, and helped him so they didn’t have to depose him. He adds that this occurred in 2009. Speaker 3 asks if there is any truth to James Patterson’s claims that Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago. Speaker 1 confirms that he definitely heard that.

The speaker claims they had Virginia Roberts' allegations about Prince Andrew, including pictures, but the palace threatened the network, fearing they wouldn't be able to interview Kate and Will, so the story was quashed. The speaker states Alan was implicated because of the planes. They say they convinced Roberts to come out of hiding after 12 years. The speaker says the story included Clinton and that they tried for 3 years to get it on the air. The speaker expresses anger that the story is now coming out as new revelations, saying they "had it all." They quote Brad Edwards, the attorney, who said 3 years ago that Jeffrey Epstein would be realized as the most prolific pedophile this country has ever known. The speaker believes Epstein was killed because he made his living blackmailing people. They state there were a lot of powerful men on those planes, visiting the island, and in that apartment.

Scott Ritter discusses the Iran talks, U.S. and Iranian positions, and the broader implications for U.S. foreign policy. - He states the talks aren’t over, describing them as a process. The United States came in crudely and with a stunt, while the Iranians were well prepared with technical papers and talking points. The talks remain ongoing, with both sides leaving technical teams behind after high-level visits; the ceasefire is two weeks and has not been terminated, so the process continues. - Ritter characterizes the situation as “the theater of the absurd” and warns it’s dangerous and could spin out of control. He criticizes Donald Trump’s approach as bluster and high-stakes posturing, saying the Iranians haven’t budged and that the U.S. has no clear objectives in the negotiations. He notes the president allegedly has “hard commitment” to Iran not producing a nuclear bomb, but asserts the fatwa against nuclear weapons remains in place and U.S. actions have undercut that position by killing the official who put the fatwa on the table. - He argues the easiest deal would be to sit down with the Iranians and “shut the door on any potential of Iran ever producing a nuclear weapon,” provided genuine experts were involved, but claims the U.S. isn’t there to make that deal. The aim, he says, is to project U.S. control and to frame Trump as the winner, irrespective of the actual outcomes. - Ritter contends Trump’s inner circle includes JD Vance, Marco Rubio, and others; he asserts Trump is using public appearances (e.g., an MMA event) to signal who is in charge and to replace others who opposed the war. He claims JD Vance did not support the war and is being sidelined or publicly discredited. He also criticizes Rubio as nominally in charge of foreign affairs but notes the State Department has been gutted, lacking a full team and interagency process. - He predicts the next two weeks will yield a deal that makes Trump the winner and Vance the loser, suggesting Rubio isn’t being promoted much and that Trump will throw everyone under the bus. He asserts there is no real change in U.S. capabilities, noting the stockpiles of missiles have not been rebuilt. - On NATO and the Ukraine war, Ritter argues drones are redefining warfare: the Ukrainian and Russian use of drones is changing battlefield dynamics, with drone operators becoming central to military effectiveness. He asserts NATO and the U.S. do not fully understand how to fight this war, and claims the conflict demonstrates the end of NATO and a broader “empire terminating event” linked to America’s failure in Iran. He stresses that drone dominance could break the battlefield’s traditional dynamics, leaving tanks and infantry less decisive. - He claims the Ukraine war’s drone innovation is the most significant development in warfare since dynamite, saying without drones you cannot prevail on the battlefield. - On Melania Trump and Epstein, Ritter declines to engage with the specifics of Melania’s personal involvement, but discusses Epstein as emblematic of America’s elite rot. He argues that Melania normalized relationships with Epstein and Maxine and that she will be seen as an enabler, whether or not criminal liability is established. He contends this politics of normalization reflects deeper decay in American power elites.

The speaker claims to have compiled an Epstein client list using victims' testimonies, internal emails, court documents, settlements, financial records, and staff testimony, not a single "black book." This list was released publicly in 2019 but received little attention due to the speaker's prior cancellation for opposing Israel. The speaker asserts that Epstein was working for a foreign government, compromising powerful Americans. Contrary to popular belief, people *have* been prosecuted and companies have paid large settlements related to Epstein, but it's not publicized. Jean Luc Brunel, allegedly the number three man in the Epstein ring, was arrested but died in prison. The speaker believes the truth about Epstein is being ignored, similar to 9/11 conspiracy theories. They state that videos from Epstein's properties exist and that many pedophiles and human traffickers are being arrested, but the media is silent. The speaker shares pages from the list and urges someone with media reach to discuss the issue.

The transcript captures a short, informal discussion about Donald Trump’s handling of the Epstein files and the broader question of whether presidents protect rich and powerful people at the expense of victims in sex-crime cases. The dialogue unfolds between Speaker 0 and Speaker 1, with a recent history/politics flavor and an on-the-record moment later in the exchange. Speaker 0 begins by asking Speaker 1 how Trump fought to avoid releasing the Epstein files, noting that Trump initially indicated a release but then reversed course. Speaker 1 responds noncommittally, suggesting that Trump “probably” had friends who were involved and that Trump “saved them” from trouble. The question is framed as whether this constitutes presidential conduct—protecting powerful people rather than victims. Speaker 0 presses further, asking if protecting rich and powerful people over sex-crime victims is appropriate for a president, and whether such behavior is common in presidential history. Speaker 1 counters by pointing to historical examples, stating that many presidents have favored their friends and families, adding that while JFK’s affairs were noted, he claims Kennedy “got caught,” implying possible crimes. Speaker 0 acknowledges Kennedy’s infidelity but questions whether there were crimes, while Speaker 1 reiterates the point that Kennedy “got caught,” and asserts that such behavior is not becoming of a United States president. The conversation shifts toward evaluating current leadership: Speaker 0 asks whether Speaker 1 agrees with Trump’s protection of powerful individuals at the expense of crime victims. Speaker 1 answers, “All depends on who the powerful people are,” suggesting a conditional view rather than a blanket condemnation or approval. The discussion then veers to the expectation that a president should serve all Americans, not just the wealthy, and Speaker 0 reiterates the moral question. Speaker 1, initially evasive about personal details, asserts that they are a state representative and holds a badge, claiming to work for their country. The exchange ends with a sense of irony in the narrator’s commentary: the “moral of the story” being that it’s acceptable for Donald Trump to protect rich and powerful men because he himself is rich and powerful, effectively equating protection of the powerful with personal parity. Overall, the transcript presents a back-and-forth debate about why presidents might shield powerful individuals, how historical precedents factor into current judgments, and whether leadership should be equally accountable to all segments of society, ending with a skeptical, wrap-up sentiment about the perceived fairness of such protections.

Transcript centers on truth and why Epstein files should be public. They note both parties avoid real reasons. Speaker 1 says the president views it as “all a trap” and that it “reminds him of Russiagate”—an attempt by Democrats to ensnare him in a fake scandal; “he's not... never did anything creepy,” the speaker says. The speaker argues transparency would have helped “the country” and “the administration,” giving it credibility. They speculate why disclosure is feared: “could it be that Trump was there and he just doesn't wanna jeopardize his presidency even putting it out there?” Epstein is described as “the center of New York society for... decades.” The claim: “I don't think having dinner at his house or even necessarily going to his island is proof of a crime.” Finally, they note “Epstein had contact with Israeli intelligence” and “British intelligence”—“probably scarier than Mossad and CIA.”

John and Mario discuss the EpsteinFiles with a focus on who is behind the cover-up, the involvement of intelligence services, and the implications for justice and power. - Epstein as Mossad asset and broader intelligence links: - John reiterates his original conclusion that Epstein was a Mossad access agent and adds that he was actively seeking contact with the CIA, the FBI, the NSC, MI5/MI6, Germany, and even Vladimir Putin, aiming to burnish his credentials with intelligence communities. Epstein allegedly requested private meetings with Putin, which were arranged with others present, and there were FOIA requests by Epstein’s attorneys to confirm associations with the CIA and NSC, which reportedly went unanswered. - Mario notes Epstein’s access to the Skiff (a highly restricted, sealed room for classified discussions) and argues Epstein’s entry suggests closer ties to American intelligence, since only Five Eyes would have access to such a space. He contrasts this with a broader view that the “movers and shakers” in American culture and the billionaire/political classes drive the cover-up, as evidenced by congressional mandates to release documents and the DOJ’s involvement. - The discussion flags that the released files show Epstein’s attempts to connect with major intelligence actors, and hints at a possible broader Israeli involvement (Mossad) and questions about whether Israelis were spying on the CIA/NSC. - The scope of the release and accountability: - John emphasizes that Congress passed a law mandating release of these documents; the executive branch has not released all materials, with millions unreleased and only a fraction of available data being disclosed (debate around 2% of data released in some outlets). He criticizes the DOJ for surveillance-like behavior of congressional briefings (e.g., a DOJ official observing members while they review materials). He also notes the CIA/FBI/FIVE EYES redactions that obscure sources and methods, and argues that there should be little redaction since Epstein is deceased. - Mario adds that the files reveal extensive redactions and questions about what remains unreleased, comparing it to the torture report’s redactions, and suggests the redactions may be politically or strategically motivated. - Notable file threads and alleged illicit activities: - A Libyan assets subplot: An associate, Greg Brown, discusses identifying and recovering frozen Libyan assets (potentially 80+ billion dollars). The plan purportedly offered Epstein a percentage (10-25%) for recovery, with Libya’s reconstruction as a potential cost. Brown claimed connections with MI6 and Mossad to identify stolen assets, illustrating a pattern of opportunities for private actors to profit from geopolitical upheavals. - Ukraine 2014 dispatches: A tweet claimed that Epstein, in 2014, discussed opportunities arising from Ukraine upheaval, with the Rothschilds emailing Epstein to discuss asset management and Ukraine, implying Epstein represented the Rothschilds in exploring opportunities amid regime changes. - The role of wealth and elite involvement: Mario and John describe how Epstein’s financial power enabled him to operate at the intersection of intelligence and global finance; the “go-to” for large asset claims is a reality that would require serious governmental or intelligence ties. - Death of Epstein and questions surrounding it: - The panel discusses the widely accepted view that Epstein did not kill himself, citing multiple irregularities: the July 23 attempt, the deletion of relevant footage, Epstein’s removal from suicide watch against protocol, a mass-murderer cellmate, unmonitored calls, camera malfunctions, and a decoy body claim. They discuss the autopsy differences (ear shape, penis description) and an DOJ note dated a day earlier than the death as a potential anomaly. - John explains that in the federal system prison guards’ qualifications and camera reliability are problematic, and argues that the death raises serious questions about the suicide narrative, while acknowledging a lack of inside information to confirm any particular theory. They discuss a decoy body and the possibility that Epstein was secretly killed, with ongoing debates about whether he’s alive or dead. - They reference a note about an escape plan and a will being signed days before death, suggesting Epstein anticipated danger and attempted to plan escape, though this is balanced against the argument that prisoners often contemplate escape. - Victims, threats, and blackmail: - They recount death threats to Epstein’s victims, including threats in Hebrew and references to Mossad-like intimidation. John explains that Western intelligence rarely issues direct threats to civilians, whereas Mossad has historically used such tactics; Epstein’s circle included individuals who reportedly faced threats and harassment. - They discuss Epstein’s private security cameras and alleged blackmail operations, citing emails in which victims describe transactional sexual experiences and Epstein’s networks. They consider whether intelligence agencies exploited Epstein’s perversion to further strategic aims and whether those networks used blackmail to recruit or control powerful individuals (e.g., Prince Andrew, Les Wexner, etc.). - High-profile associations and potential redactions: - Fergie (Sarah Ferguson) is mentioned as having close ties with Epstein, including emails after his conviction and marriage-like language; Prince Andrew is highlighted as heavily implicated. They discuss whether these relationships were used for blackmail or influence, and whether such information remains usable as leverage. - The breadth of individuals implicated ranges from Trump to Clinton to business titans; John notes there is no direct evidence of crimes by Trump or Clinton in released materials, but the extent of connections complicates public perception. - Conclusion and ongoing questions: - The conversation closes with an agreement that Epstein’s death and the surrounding files reveal a web of intelligence connections, high-level influence, and potential blackmail, with substantial redactions and a continuing need for full disclosure to understand the full extent of involvement, high-level figures, and the truth behind Epstein’s death. They anticipate further file releases and ongoing analysis.