TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Vaccine court has thousands of individuals who claim vaccines caused their children's autism, with supporting documentation. This presents an opportunity to study these children and identify common factors that may have made them susceptible to injury. The speaker has inquired why such a study hasn't been conducted. The responses given are inadequate, such as suggesting someone else should do it or citing privacy concerns. The speaker believes parents would gladly share records for research if approached with trust. The speaker suspects the lack of interest stems from a pre-existing knowledge of the answer, echoing Dr. Healy's suggestion that the question is deliberately avoided.

Vaccines don't cause autism. The science is clear. Vaccines don't cause autism. Vaccines do not cause autism. I do not deny that we need to do more about autism, but it has nothing to do with vaccines. We have thoroughly debunked any association between autism and these vaccines. Robert, it is nearly consensus in the scientific community that there's no link there. To deny a mountain of scientific evidence, which has already taught us that the combination of measles, mumps, rubella, or MMR vaccine doesn't cause autism, Vimerosal, an ethylmercury containing preservative that wasn't a number of vaccines doesn't cause autism, and that too many vaccines given too soon, if you will, doesn't also cause autism. We know that the schedule is safe. Are there peer reviewed scientific reports that indicate a link between No. Between vaccines and autism? No. Not only is there not a peer reviewed work, this is probably the most studied public health issue involving children. Vaccines are really the one thing we have looked at as causing autism. The Institutes of Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control have repeatedly investigated this. Vaccines do not cause autism. We don't need more research. At some point, enough is enough. It's fine to continue to collect data, but at some point, you have to take note for an answer. We're not sure what causes autism, but we know that vaccines do not. Mountains of evidence. No, you know, this has been looked at extensively. Nothing's been more studied in the world than this connection between vaccines and autism. We'd heard it. We've heard it for decades. You know, actually almost a century now, if you want to get into it. This has been the battle cry of the pharmaceutical industry and every shill that works for them. But whether you know it or not all the way back in 2020 for those of you that were watching then we actually disproved this myth right then. Debunked it with a lawsuit where we went at the CDC and said really if the head of your page on the CDC website says vaccines plural meaning all vaccines do not cause us to do we have that original website. This is what it said: vaccines do not cause autism. There it is. All vaccines doesn't say one of them or two of them all vaccines by the plural s at the end of vaccines. If vaccines do not cause autism will you please provide us with all of the evidence and studies that show that vaccines don't cause autism. Send us that evidence. Well they didn't and we sued them and we went to court. Back in 2020, we won the case. Here it looks like in the document. They gave us the list. It's actually 20 studies. 20 total studies make up the entire list of what they look to when they say that these childhood vaccines, the five, and the cumulative effects of them given in the first six months of life, do not cause autism. The first one is an MMR study. The second one an MMR and a DTaP study. The next ones are MMR, these four are MMR and Thimerosal studies. Then the next all the way through to 20 are all just Thimerosal studies. Lastly, we have one antigen study. Of the 20 studies, the first MMR studies are not in the first six months of life; Thimerosal studies show none of the vaccines in the first six months of life had Thimerosal. There was only one study relevant to the first six months of life, the IOM review of the DTaP vaccine, and it said there are no studies that prove or disprove the association with autism. Therefore, that was the only one that was relevant to the first six months of life, and it proved that they had no answers. And so for everyone that's ever sent Mountain of Evidence, that's been a lie. We won in court. It's a lie. You can take that to the bank. And actually just months after winning that lawsuit, that was in May, by August they pulled down the statement vaccines do not cause autism. We celebrated it but five months later it went back up and we've been stuck there with this propaganda statement that have no basis in science up until last night when this happened to the website. Let's see the new page. Here it is. It now says autism and vaccines and right under that it has the key points. So we read those key points. The claim vaccines do not cause autism is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism, meaning those vaccines in the first six months of life. Meaning the IOM lawsuit that proved that. Studies supporting a link have been ignored by health authorities. HHS has launched a comprehensive assessment of the causes of autism, including investigations on plausible biologic mechanisms and potential causal links. It does have an explanatory statement I want to read right now. It says this about why you will still see it with an asterisk the header vaccines do not cause autism has not been completely removed due to an agreement with the chair of the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee that it would remain on the CDC website. Apparently, this was that backroom deal that was made with Senator Cassidy, of course, when Robert Kennedy Jr. was up there. But now you can see on the page it is clear we are making the statement or it's being made by the CDC that this is not a scientific statement and so ultimately this is a massive change. I tweeted out about it today and to every parent of an autistic child that's been out there. For every one of you that did interviews, whether in the film Vaxxed or when we toured the nation and for everyone that's ever been gaslit, the days of gaslighting are over. We are now moving into science-based, evidence-based statements on the CDC website. It's a beautiful day.

Free speech is essential for scientific progress and would have led to better outcomes during the pandemic. Taboos in science exist, and the current scientific literature lacks deep and honest inquiry into certain topics, such as the causes of rising autism rates. The aim is to shatter these taboos, enabling honest questioning and answers grounded in truth. During the pandemic, certain statements were taboo, such as acknowledging immunity after recovering from COVID. Under Secretary Kennedy's and President Trump's leadership, the administration aims to eliminate these taboos and promote free speech in science and medicine.

The discussion addresses whether vaccines cause autism and whether relevant agencies will investigate this. Regarding the MMR vaccine, studies have failed to find a causal link to autism, including a large Danish study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children over years, which showed no difference in autism rates. For other vaccines like polio, there's less research specifically examining links to autism. While the speaker doesn't know the full literature extent, they haven't seen the same level of evidence for vaccines other than MMR. Biologically, it's considered unlikely that vaccines are the main reason for the documented rise in autism.

The speaker states that autism is a preventable disease caused by environmental exposure, not genes, though genes can provide vulnerability. A study by Blacksell et al. estimates the cost of treating autism in the US will be a trillion dollars a year by 2035, adding to already astronomical healthcare costs. According to Irva Herzbachoda, research into genetic causes of autism receives 10 to 20 times more funding than research into environmental factors, which is where the answer lies. Autism destroys families and children, many of whom were fully functional before regressing around age two due to environmental exposure. These children may never hold a job, pay taxes, or live independently. The speaker believes "we are doing this to our children" and it needs to end.

The speaker describes the "behaviorist narrative" of autism as a DSM-5 mental illness, like schizophrenia or paranoia, that is purely psychological. The speaker contrasts this with her own experience, observing her child's physical symptoms like screaming pain, uncontrolled arm movements, self-injury, speech loss, and bowel issues. This led her to believe autism is not just behavioral but biomedical, potentially traceable to an onset or exacerbating factor. She claims that exploring biomedical issues and asking about potential causes is "dangerous" because it implicates "big pharma" and the possibility that vaccines, medications, environmental factors, or untreated illnesses may result in an autism diagnosis. She states that mainstream medicine claims ignorance of autism's cause, but that independent inquiry reveals a "huge cover-up" involving silenced doctors, redacted papers, and fearful scientists. The speaker concludes by noting the irony of being married to someone who censors those exploring these issues.

Speaker 0 frames the issue as 'the corruption of science' and the 'capture of the agencies' by pharmaceutical industries, stating the goal is to restore integrity and credibility to science. Speaker 1 cites a CDC internal study: 'black boys who got the vaccine on time had a two hundred and sixty percent greater chance of getting an autism diagnosis than children who waited.' He adds that 'The chief chief scientist on that, Doctor. William Thompson, the senior said vaccine safety science at CDC, was ordered to destroy that data. And then they published it without that fact.' Finally, he asserts, 'So, you know that story. And you know of hundreds of stories like that. It happens all the time. We are being lied to by these agencies, and we're gonna change that right now.'

The speaker believes someone is serious about MAHA and concerned that vaccines cause autism, a claim he previously made but then stopped. Robert Kennedy also believes this and commissioned a study of existing data, specifically US government datasets like CMS, Medicare, and Medicaid. The study aims to detect a connection between the expansion of the vaccine schedule and the rise in autism. While a connection cannot be definitively stated, it seems likely to the speaker, and the president is reportedly concerned about it.

The speaker discusses the complexity of vaccines and the correlation with autism rates. They compare the number of vaccines in the US to other countries and question why certain vaccines are not widely used. They criticize limited studies on vaccine safety and call for more thorough research. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the details and not dismissing concerns about vaccine safety. The speaker expresses frustration with those who do not thoroughly investigate the issue. Ultimately, the focus is on finding ways to help children without causing unnecessary conflict.

Vaccines cause autism, according to the speaker. They claim that a graph showing the percentage of vaccinated children versus the age of their first vaccination indicates a link between the MMR vaccine and autism. The speaker also suggests that there is a significant increase in autism incidence among children who receive the vaccine between 12 and 18 months compared to those who receive it after three years. They argue that the CDC refuses to conduct a vaccinated versus unvaccinated study because the results would reveal a high risk. The speaker questions the credibility of a study used to dismiss the vaccine-autism connection and calls for changes in vaccination policies.

The speaker claims epidemiological studies are easily manipulated and that proper studies comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated groups are lacking, except for a CDC study in 1999. This CDC study, led by Thomas Verstraten, allegedly compared children who received the hepatitis vaccine within the first thirty days of life to those vaccinated later or not at all. The speaker asserts the study found a 1,135% elevated risk of autism in vaccinated children, which "shocked" researchers. The speaker alleges the CDC then kept the study secret and manipulated it through five iterations to bury the link.

The speakers claim that well-funded entities suppressed the truth about autism. They state that parents of autistic children who have tried to investigate the causes of autism have encountered intense resistance. They allege that studies used to support the claim that vaccines don't cause autism are easily disproven, but the media's ownership allows the lie to spread faster than the truth. One speaker believes that many find it too difficult to accept that vaccines could cause autism. They mention someone who suspects a vaccine caused their child's autism but still shamed others for not taking the COVID vaccine, illustrating the power of propaganda. People are afraid of social ostracization and are hesitant to speak their minds, often only whispering their true feelings to close friends. The speakers reference montages showing the horrible things people said about unvaccinated individuals.

Cynthia Navison found that from birth year 2000 to 2013, the autism rate in Marin County, California, among children born to wealthy white and Asian parents, plateaued and then declined. This is unprecedented. Vaccination rates also declined in that population during that time because parents were worried about safety and the number of shots. While other factors could be involved, the CDC has not investigated this matter. The speaker suggests this inaction indicates the CDC knows what is happening and doesn't want to investigate it. The speaker believes autism stems from regulatory capture.

The speaker discusses the misconception that vaccines are always beneficial and highlights the lower under-five mortality rates in other countries with fewer vaccines. They question why certain vaccines, like flu and varicella, are not widely adopted in other countries and raise concerns about the correlation between vaccines and autism. Another speaker emphasizes the need for an open debate on this topic and criticizes the limited number of vaccines and ingredients studied in relation to autism. They express frustration with doctors who dismiss the potential link between vaccines and autism without thoroughly examining the research. The speaker urges for a more collaborative approach to help children and criticizes those who antagonize the medical community.

Think about what we've done with autism. Right? There's a whole big push of finding answers for autism. The problem with autism. It's not a one answer. No, it's a myriad of answers. It's really risk factors. What are the risk factors that puts my kid at risk for autism? And the risk factors could be you gave your kid antibiotics, could be mom was drinking a lot of alcohol during pregnancy, could be mom was stressed during pregnancy, could be maybe something in the vaccine. Right? But you can't talk about that because that kills, that starts hesitancy, that creates a narrative change, but we have to talk about that. We have to look at all the risk factors so we could say, okay, antibiotics on their own is not going to create autism because you have seen kids that took antibiotics and didn't get autism. Vaccines on their own are not going to create autism because we've seen kids that were vaccinated and are fine and never got autism. However, what are the cumulative risk factors?

Autism is caused by vaccines, according to the speaker. The CDC's VirTrak study from 1989 showed a 1350% elevated risk for autism among children who received the hepatitis B vaccine in their first 30 days. A series of 13 studies were allegedly done by people paid by the CDC to create the illusion that vaccines don't cause autism. The chief scientist, Paul Thornsen, is a fugitive wanted by Interpol for stealing millions from the CDC that he claimed to use for the study. His study is considered fraudulent but has not been retracted. The speaker claims there are hundreds of studies linking autism and neurological injuries to vaccines, citing a book with 1,400 references and over 400 studies. The speaker believes the CDC is a dishonest organization owned by the pharmaceutical industry and promotes propaganda that vaccines don't cause autism.

I raised concerns about investing NIH resources to re-examine the link between the measles vaccine and autism, given the extensive existing research and limited resources. It's impossible to prove a negative, and re-plowing already examined ground distracts from addressing unknown causes or solutions to the chronic disease crisis. We risk children dying from preventable diseases if we keep pretending this link is an issue. I agree that we need to address the rise in autism. While I believe the literature shows no connection between the MMR vaccine and autism, distrust in medicine exists post-pandemic. Providing good data is key to addressing concerns, but I'm unsure what constitutes "good data" when it already exists. The focus should be on pressing childhood health problems like diabetes and obesity, which should be the priorities of the NIH director.

World governments have harmed millions without apology. The speaker believes vaccines cause autism, but mainstream media won't discuss it. They gathered data from 10,000 parents showing a link between vaccines and autism, ADHD, and other health issues. More shots lead to poorer health in children.

Kendall asks for an explanation of the process by which the MMR vaccine causes autism, referencing the movie Vaxxed. Speaker 2 responds that they are currently researching those questions, as parents and physicians have reported children developing autism immediately after the MMR vaccine. The speaker claims studies that should have been done long ago were not. Instead, the speaker alleges that captured researchers at the CDC, mainly people who work for the pharmaceutical industry, produced bad epidemiological studies. The speaker asserts that these studies deliberately avoided comparing health outcomes in vaccinated versus unvaccinated groups. Speaker 0 states that this is one of the things they are studying now with gold standard science. Speaker 2 confirms they are doing gold standard science, which includes replication. They are allocating about 20% of their budget to replicating studies. Speaker 0 explains replication as an independent group repeating a study with the same parameters and data sets to achieve the same result. Speaker 2 agrees.

A film festival featured a documentary about vaccines by Del Bigtree. The speaker mentions an interview where the host tried to shut down a discussion about the documentary. The interviewee has an autistic son and believes there's a link between vaccines and autism. One speaker questions why people can't ask about the potential link between vaccines and autism, noting that an additive was removed from vaccines, though it supposedly had nothing to do with autism. The World Council For Health urges parents to consider a "safer to wait" approach, deferring the childhood vaccine schedule. Five studies allegedly show that unvaccinated children are healthier, with lower rates of food allergies, asthma, dermatitis, need for ear tubes, attention deficit disorder, Asperger's, and autism. The speaker concludes that excessive vaccination is likely harming children.

Democrats are allegedly being instructed to sue HHS and RFK Jr. to halt the investigation into the cause of autism, which affects one in thirty children, and one in twelve boys in California. Twenty-five percent of autistic children are reportedly nonverbal. The speaker believes that big pharma, big food, and big chemical companies already know the cause of autism and are pressuring Democrat lawmakers to stop the investigation. The speaker questions why anyone would not want to know the cause of autism and asserts that mainstream media, which receives over 70% of its income from big pharma, is likely preparing hit campaigns against RFK Jr. The speaker believes the motivation is money and that these entities care more about profits than people's health. Despite this, the speaker believes the cause of autism will eventually be discovered and that RFK Jr. is making a significant move to block big pharma.

If the autism epidemic is due to better diagnostics, it should be seen in older people, but it is not. Where are the 71-year-olds with full-blown autism? They are not seen in malls, homes, or institutions. The speaker claims this absence indicates a falsehood, likely perpetuated by industries profiting from an environmental toxin in air, water, medicines, or food. These industries benefit from normalizing autism and claiming it has always existed. The speaker asserts it is not good for the country or the press to not be skeptical. New studies will soon be announced to identify the specific environmental toxins causing autism, which the speaker claims has not been done before. The speaker anticipates providing answers to the American people quickly.

The speaker states that previous CDC studies on autism were epidemiological and designed to avoid finding a link. They claim the Institute of Medicine criticized the CDC's vaccine schedule decision-making, alleging the ASIP panel was captured by industry due to financial entanglements. The speaker says the Institute of Medicine recommended various studies, including animal models, which the CDC allegedly ignored, opting instead for manipulated epidemiological studies. They claim these studies didn't compare fully vaccinated to unvaccinated groups. According to the speaker, a 1999 CDC study led by Thomas Verstraten found an 1135% elevated autism risk in vaccinated children. They allege the CDC concealed and manipulated this study to bury the link by removing older children from the data and using other statistical tricks. The speaker asserts that over 100 external studies indicate a link between vaccines and autism.

The speakers discuss the controversy surrounding vaccines and autism. They mention that some people believe vaccines can be dangerous for certain individuals who are more susceptible. They express frustration that this issue is not being properly addressed and that there are many people who claim to have witnessed their child's sudden change after receiving vaccines. They mention a movie called "Vaxxed" that was supported by Robert De Niro until he received a mysterious phone call, after which he withdrew his support. The speakers question why this clip is not shown and speculate that someone may have influenced De Niro's decision.

Autism is a complex disorder with multifactorial ideology. We are continuing to investigate multiplicity of potential causes with no areas of taboo. One area that we are closely examining, as the president mentioned, is vaccines. Some forty to seventy percent of mothers who have children with autism believe that their child was injured by a vaccine. President Trump believes that we should be listening to these mothers instead of gaslighting and marginalize them marginalizing them like prior administrations. Some of our friends like to say that we should believe all women. Some of these same people have been silencing and demonizing these mothers for three decades because research on the potential link between autism and vaccines has been actively suppressed in the past.