TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In my 30 years as a prosecutor, judge, and DA, I have never seen a witness torn apart like Michael Cohen. He lies constantly, including to congress, judges, and in court. Cohen claimed to have resolved an issue with Trump in 2016, but evidence showed otherwise. This case is a circus led by a liar. A judge should dismiss it before going to a jury.

The speaker claims someone is lying about a conversation and has fabricated components of it. The speaker reveres the office of the presidency and will keep the readout confidential, but asserts the individual in question has been a "stone cold liar" regarding their discussion. The speaker states the National Guard was never discussed. The speaker would like to share what was actually discussed, claiming it would be shocking, but attorneys prevent them from doing so.

An individual confronts Roger about conversations on Grindr with underage boys. The individual claims to have evidence of these conversations and accuses Roger of being a pedophile. Roger denies knowing the ages of the people he talks to on Grindr, stating he assumes they are of age and cancels conversations if he learns otherwise. The individual expresses disbelief, asserting they wouldn't be there without evidence. The confrontation escalates, with the individual threatening to call the cops, go to Roger's church, or go to SDSU and reveal the chat logs to expose Roger's alleged actions. Roger's companion urges him to stop the recording. The individual states they are recording Roger because he is a "fucking pedophile."

The speaker criticizes someone for pretending to be self-made and calls them a fraud. They challenge the person to meet them anytime, anywhere. The speaker and the person they are addressing exchange heated words, with the speaker telling the person to sit down multiple times. The person tries to respond but is told they can't because it is a hearing.

The speaker admits to reporting the attorney general to the FBI without evidence of any criminal activity. When questioned about this, the speaker avoids directly answering and instead emphasizes their "good faith belief" that a crime had occurred. They also claim to have not collected any evidence after making the complaint. The questioning becomes tense as the speaker is repeatedly asked if they had any evidence to support their claims, but they continue to evade a direct answer.

An individual confronts another, calling them a "coward baby killer" and "scum of the earth," accusing them of killing babies and being a "five g Jew." They demand the person leave the country and go back to Israel, claiming they are trying to subjugate the government. The speaker accuses the other of being happy about bombing people and spreading dangerous propaganda, leading to events like what happened in Washington DC. They assert the person doesn't deserve a place on the planet and calls them a "satanic demon." The other individual is asked for their name, eventually revealing it to be Zori Shields. The speaker expresses pride in wanting to get "scum" like Zori out of the country, labeling them a "vile child killing demon."

Norm, you're exactly who I wanted to talk to. It doesn't matter that I'm on a call because you're a liar who set up this whole trial, and Costello exposed your lies. You're going to jail, bro. I'm not harassing you; I'm asking questions about how you lied to set up this trial and coerced Michael Cohen to pay Stormy Daniels with his own money. Costello testified to that, and you're lying about it, Norm. Why are you lying? You are destroying this country, and you know it. You're going to jail. They like guys like you in jail. Do you know what happens to guys like you in jail, Norm?

Speaker 1, alongside House Freedom Caucus members, criticizes Michael Cohen for lying to various branches of government for personal gain. They accuse the judge of bias due to family ties to Democrat politics. They express concern over lack of evidence presented and unfair treatment in court. Speaker 0, Bob Good, accuses Democrats of trying to sabotage the election by targeting the nominee and using a corrupt prosecutor, witness, and judge. They assert that despite these efforts, President Trump will be reelected.

The speaker, who claims to have been involved in government for a long time, accuses the person they are addressing of betraying the country and being involved in various wrongdoings. They mention a past incident involving a terrorist ring and a false flag plot. The speaker criticizes the person for their actions and recruitment tactics, including spreading disinformation. They challenge the person to a deposition to reveal the truth and stop the attacks. The speaker believes that once the truth comes out, those who were manipulated by the person will turn against them. They also mention the Russian collusion investigation and accuse the person of fabricating evidence. The speaker calls for an end to the attacks and for the country to move forward.

The speaker claims that there was a scandal where their campaign was spied on, but the other person disagrees and says there is no evidence. The speaker insists that there is evidence everywhere and wants it to be put on the show. The other person explains that they can't put on unverified information. The speaker continues to assert that their campaign was spied on and that it was caught. They accuse the other person of knowing this but not wanting to acknowledge it. The other person denies knowing anything about it.

A person confronts an individual, accusing him of keying a Tesla, stating there's video evidence online and that the license plate was recorded. The accused denies the act, even after being told he was seen doing it. The speaker questions the motive, pointing out the accused's USA t-shirt, Korean car, and the possibility that the Tesla owner is a Democrat. The speaker expresses disbelief and wishes the accused good luck, hoping he learns a lesson. The accused then tells the speaker to chase him.

The speaker confronts someone who is trying to arrest them and demands to know why. They accuse the person of assault and claim to have recorded everything. The speaker repeatedly tells the person to back off and accuses them of being a "fucking dick." They mention that the incident will be shared on YouTube and ask for the person's name and badge number. The speaker accuses the person of being a communist and urges them to call their police chief. They express anger and shame towards the person and mention something about a horse.

The defense calls Bob Costello as a witness who exonerates the defendant, revealing that Michael Cohen had nothing on Donald Trump. The judge then clears the courtroom, causing chaos among the media and police. Alan Dershowitz was present and described it as the craziest moment in his legal career.

The speaker questions the credibility of the person testifying, mentioning past accusations of lying. The speaker also brings up payments made to the testifier's attorney by a political action committee. The speaker criticizes the testifier for calling various individuals, including the FBI and colleagues, liars. The speaker expresses skepticism towards the testifier's claims of truthfulness.

The speakers discuss whether or not Donald Trump lied about his knowledge of the Stormy Daniels payment. Speaker 1 argues that it wasn't a lie because acknowledging it would violate the confidential settlement. Speaker 0 challenges this, stating that Trump did know about it. They also discuss allegations against a former prosecutor, Pomerantz, who allegedly violated grand jury secrecy laws. Speaker 1 believes Pomerantz's actions will lead to criminal charges. They then debate the validity of the Stormy Daniels case, with Speaker 1 arguing that it doesn't constitute a crime. Finally, Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 would defend Trump in the January 6th case, to which Speaker 1 responds that it depends on the allegations.

The speaker confronts someone, asking for their name and threatening to call the police. The person being confronted refuses to give their name and tells the speaker to walk away. The speaker insists on calling the police and threatens to ruin the person's job. Another person intervenes, asking everyone to step away and calling for the police. The speaker continues to demand the person's name. The video ends abruptly.

The speaker demands Tush James apologize to President Trump for a "witch trial" that wasted millions of New York state dollars. The speaker asks James how it feels to know she will be imprisoned for mortgage fraud.

The speaker suggests that the person being discussed is aware of committing fraud and is now playing to the public. They mention the stress this person is facing, knowing they may never do business in their home state again. Another speaker mentions the extraordinary nature of the trial and shares social media posts from both sides. Donald Trump accuses the attorney general of corruption, while the attorney general sarcastically comments on one of Trump's properties. The speaker concludes by mentioning that there are four more criminal trials scheduled for Donald Trump in the coming year.

The speaker denies ever speaking with former President Trump. The speaker tells Trump to "get a life" and "help these people." The speaker demands accountability and insists that the person being addressed knows the truth.

This is a video where the speaker expresses their strong opinions and accuses John Podesta and George Soros of being involved in some kind of negative activity. The speaker is determined to win and challenges them to reveal what they are hiding.

Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of working for a Russian oligarch and misusing money. Speaker 1 denies the accusations and criticizes Speaker 0's integrity. The conversation becomes heated as they argue about truth and lies. Speaker 1 questions the DOJ's treatment of him compared to Speaker 0. Speaker 0 mentions Speaker 1's conviction and reduced sentence. Speaker 1 challenges Speaker 0's credibility. The exchange ends with Speaker 1 accusing Speaker 0 of not being able to handle the truth.

Ben Wittes is accused of being a liar who set up the Stormy Daniels situation with Michael Cohen, Andrew Weissman, and Norm Isen. Cohen allegedly paid Daniels with his own money, according to Costello's testimony. Wittes is also accused of criminal activity related to money sent to his house for a nonprofit. The Law Fair Institute is said to have paid Vindman over $300,000 since he allegedly lied on the stand. Everyone involved is accused of being a "scumbag" who will go to jail.

The speaker claims Felix Sater, a Russian real estate developer who worked on the Trump Tower Moscow deal and had an office in Trump Tower, is an FBI informant since 1998. They allege Sater has two secret agreements with Andrew Weissman, one from 1998 when Weissman was a US attorney, and another when Weissman was lead prosecutor for the Mueller investigation. The speaker says Weissman mentioned Sater 11 times in his book and claimed he told Robert Mueller to bring Sater in as a cooperating witness. The speaker alleges that when they asked Weissman about his relationship with Sater, Weissman denied knowing him. The speaker believes Michael Cohen is also an FBI informant and that there is a setup between Sater, Cohen, and Stormy Daniels. They suggest Cohen may have used Stormy Daniels' lawsuit, filled with lies, to extort Trump. The speaker claims that when they asked Norm Eisen and Andrew Weissman about the relationship between Sater and Cohen, Eisen hung up and Weissman lied.

The speaker expresses concern about election interference and accuses Biden and his associates of running a campaign to damage him. They criticize the corruption and bias in the legal system, specifically mentioning Mark Pomerantz and Colangelo. The speaker believes that the ongoing trials are unfair and politically motivated. They mention the raid on Mar-a-Lago and claim it is illegal. The speaker also discusses their financial situation, stating they have a lot of cash and a successful company. They express frustration with the judge and attorney general in New York and suggest that businesses may leave the state. The speaker concludes by saying they would be willing to testify in the trial if it proceeds.

In this video, Speaker 0 confronts Speaker 1, accusing him of being anti-American and anti-free speech. Speaker 0 criticizes Speaker 1 for working at CNN and trying to censor conservative voices. Speaker 1 denies the accusations and refuses to engage in an interview with Speaker 0. The conversation becomes heated, with Speaker 0 calling Speaker 1 a liar and a fraud. Speaker 0 also accuses CNN of being fake news and engaging in racketeering. The video ends with Speaker 0 expressing his belief that the truth about Speaker 1 and CNN will eventually come out.