reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker asks about President Biden's conflicts of interest regarding sanctions on individuals who have done business with his family. They mention a report alleging that the First Son's company received $3,500,000 from a Russian woman. The speaker questions how Biden is navigating these conflicts and asks for an explanation of the $3,500,000. The other speaker responds by saying they have no confirmation of the report's accuracy and no further details. When asked about conflicts of interest, the speaker questions what those conflicts would be and points out that Biden has sanctioned more oligarchs than before, suggesting it is not a conflict of interest.

The White House was asked if the president still stands by his statement that he has never been involved in his son's affairs or spoken to him about it. The response was that the president has never been in business with his son, and there is nothing more to add.

President Biden was asked about allegations regarding his family's business interests in Ukraine and China. Polling by the Associated Press suggests that a significant number of Americans, including Democrats, believe he acted illegally or unethically. Biden denied the allegations, stating that he did not interact with his son and brother's foreign business associates. He refused to comment further on the matter. It was noted that he seemed more interested in addressing questions about Ukraine.

Have you ruled out a pardon for yourself or family members? Yes, I have. What would I pardon myself for? I have no intention of pardoning myself because I didn't do anything wrong. Could you comment on Meta's decision to...

I have never received any money from any foreign source in my entire life. It has come to our attention that the current president has paid significantly more taxes in China, possesses a hidden bank account in China, conducts business in China, and has made claims about me accepting money. However, I want to clarify that I have never accepted any money from any country at any time.

The speaker is asked about the appropriateness of his son's work in China and Ukraine. He denies any wrongdoing, stating that he carried out his job impeccably and that no one found anything out of line. He also mentions that the person who got in trouble in Ukraine was trying to bribe the government to say something negative about him, which never happened. He denies his son making money from China and dismisses the claim that his son received a large payment from a Ukrainian company. He concludes by stating that there is no basis for any wrongdoing in Ukraine.

Speaker 0 denies any knowledge or discussion about his business or his family's business with his son or anyone else. Speaker 1 reveals that Stephanie, who was vice president, approved a response to a 2015 story about Hunter Biden's connection to Burisma Energy Company. It is also mentioned that Biden's family received less than $1,000,000 from a Chinese firm.

I have never discussed my business or my family's businesses with my son, including anything related to Ukraine or his overseas ventures. There is photographic evidence showing that President Joe Biden met with Hunter's business partners and high-ranking Chinese officials without any legitimate government purpose. This evidence was hidden from the American public before the election. The permanent bureaucracy in Washington has attempted to prevent President Trump from returning to office, yet he won a significant victory. The American people are frustrated with a government that has neglected and betrayed them.

Speaker 1 denies ever discussing his son's overseas business dealings and claims to have never discussed anything related to Ukraine. He also states that he has never discussed his own business or his children's business. Speaker 1 dismisses claims that he was on speaker phone discussing business matters and points out that he was aware of his son's business but never talked about it. Speaker 2 admits to having shell companies that collected money through tax fraud, and compares it to what he sees happening with Biden. Speaker 1 emphasizes that there is no evidence to support any wrongdoing.

The State Department was asked if they had any concerns about the vice president's son joining the board of a Ukrainian gas company. The speaker clarified that the son is a private citizen and not a government official. When asked about the perception of conflict or cronyism, the speaker stated that there are no concerns from the State Department. They do not believe that the involvement of the vice president's son would be perceived negatively by the Russians or Ukrainians.

The speaker was asked about polling data that suggests a majority of Americans, including some Democrats, believe they acted illegally or unethically regarding their family's business interests. The speaker refused to comment and denied any interaction with their son and brother's foreign business associates, calling it a bunch of lies.

I'm personally ensuring there are no conflicts of interest. He reports to me, and he wouldn't engage in anything conflicting anyway. We're not allowing him to participate in any matters where a conflict of interest exists. If there was no conflict, it wouldn't matter.

Hunter Biden and the Biden family's private citizen status means their work does not reflect administration endorsement. The State Department has no concerns about Hunter Biden's involvement with a Ukrainian gas company. Biden has stated he will not work for foreign companies if his father becomes president. The President's son's investments are being unwound, and any further questions should be directed to his representatives. The President's policy remains that his family will not have business relationships with foreign entities. The focus should be on investigating Trump. Hunter Biden's alleged overseas business dealings are not to be discussed from the podium.

The speaker asks if the State Department has concerns about the vice president's son joining a Ukrainian gas company's board of directors. The State Department refers the question to the vice president's office. The speaker then asks if the State Department has concerns about potential conflict or cronyism, similar to what they accuse the Russians of. The response is that the vice president's son is a private citizen, not in the same category as Russian or Ukrainian oligarchs. The speaker further asks if there are concerns about how the Russians and Ukrainians would perceive the involvement of the vice president's son, given the situation. The response is that there are no concerns.

Hunter Biden's involvement with a Ukrainian energy company while his father, Joe Biden, was Vice President is questioned. Joe Biden claims he didn't know what his son was doing and only found out after he joined the board. He trusts his son and sees no reason to investigate further. The interviewer suggests that as Vice President, Joe Biden should have been more aware of his family's activities, but Joe Biden dismisses the idea. He deflects by mentioning the issues surrounding Trump's family. Joe Biden believes there is no evidence to suggest any wrongdoing on his son's part.

I want to clarify that my father had no financial involvement in my business.

I won't discuss any private conversations the president has with his family, including any talks with Hunter.

President Biden denies discussing business matters with his son or family members. He claims to have never spoken to his son about it and avoids any knowledge or involvement in their business dealings. When asked if he stands by his statement of not discussing his son's overseas affairs, he affirms his stance.

Vice President denies ever discussing his son's overseas business dealings, emphasizing a clear separation between personal and government matters. He stands by his statement and claims to have been unaware of his son's involvement in a particular company. The Vice President asserts that he has never discussed his own business or his children's business, specifically mentioning Ukraine.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 about his son's involvement in a Ukrainian energy company facing corruption charges. Speaker 1 claims to have no knowledge of his son's activities and trusts him. Speaker 0 questions the lack of accountability, but Speaker 1 deflects by mentioning Trump's family. Speaker 1 denies any wrongdoing and states that there is no evidence against his son. When asked about guardrails if elected, Speaker 1 asserts that his relatives will not engage in foreign business due to the current administration's controversies. No foreign business dealings will occur.

I won't engage in business with those who support the president-elect. My priority is to ensure a safe environment for myself, my staff, and my family.

I will not comment on allegations regarding my family's business dealings. The claims are false. I did not interact with their business associates. There are many questions.

Neither Mr. Bobolinski nor Mr. Galenis have heard of any offers of a pardon for those involved in the Biden Family Enterprise corruption investigation. Mr. Bobolinski confirmed this during the questioning.

I don't engage in politics, but I have a lot on my agenda. Helping Ukraine, addressing Russian aggression, working with allies, dealing with challenges from China, and focusing on the situation in Sudan. The laptop being Russian disinformation is not something I accept.

The speaker is asked about polling data that suggests a majority of Americans, including Democrats, believe they acted illegally or unethically regarding their family's business interests. The speaker denies these allegations, stating that they did not interact with their son and brother's foreign business associates. They dismiss the claims as lies.