reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 1's initial reaction to the October 7th Hamas attack was disbelief and prayer, anticipating a disastrous Israeli revenge. During a November 9th rally, an unaffiliated individual yelled "death to Jews." Speaker 1 confronted the person, stating they didn't represent the group and then addressed the crowd, condemning the statement as antisemitic. Speaker 1 believes antisemitism is unjust. The speaker stated that the fight for Palestinian freedom and the fight against antisemitism are interconnected, because injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.

Speaker 0 asserts that another revolution is coming, aiming to achieve a broader peace, describing Israel’s conflict as an eight-front war—Jews against Rome, with the United States as the new Rome—and stating that Rome and Jerusalem clashed over values, a tragedy the Jews lost but must win next time. Speaker 1 adds that Jews against Rome have shifted from defense to offense. Speaker 2 notes that weapons evolve and swords do not work today, implying the need for new tools; Speaker 1 emphasizes that the battle requires the genius that created Apollo, pagers, and penetrated Hezbollah to prepare for this fight. Speaker 2 argues the most important battlefields are social media, with the next war to be decided online as much as offline. Speaker 0 designates this as the eighth front: the disinformation campaign. Speaker 3 and Speaker 0 discuss the scale of online manipulation, claiming billions of dollars are invested in the information battlefield by NGOs and governments, and asserting that money drives the effort. Speaker 6 and Speaker 7 describe policies to prohibit harmful stereotypes about Jews and to deplatform those who propagate them; they claim monitoring online spaces, including social media, messaging apps, video games, and cryptocurrency, and sharing intelligence with the FBI. Speaker 7 and others reference a spectrum of platforms and formats—podcasts, short-form video, Wikipedia, LLMs—and condemn antisemitism online, including “Hitler admires, Stalin admires, Jew haters,” while insisting on countermeasures. Speaker 8 and Speaker 9 discuss TikTok as a focal point, asserting that for every thirty minutes spent on TikTok, users become 17% more antisemitic, with carnage imagery from Gaza influencing perceptions; there is a stated problem with TikTok shaping youth attitudes. Speaker 10 and Speaker 6 describe redefining terms like Zionist as a proxy for Jews and Israelis, framing such language as hate speech; Speaker 11 indicates a desire for counterintelligence and critiques current curriculum, while Speaker 1 notes co-authoring Sunday school curricula with the ADL. Speaker 11 and Speaker 6 discuss developing technology to train LLMs and to combat antisemitism, with collaboration announced with OpenAI, Alphabet, Anthropic, Meta, and Microsoft; Speaker 10 notes a network of two dozen Jewish organizations feeding intelligence. Speaker 1 outlines a program to measure, monitor, and disrupt extremist content, with a full-time team of 40 analysts; Speaker 12 mentions monitoring campuses, digital networks, activist groups, and public officials, and that PhDs and academics support the effort. Speaker 13 and Speaker 14 discuss unifying data into a single platform, investing in intelligence, and mobilizing organizations to share information and fight common enemies; Speaker 12 emphasizes constant recording and reporting, aiming to mobilize allies. Speaker 15 and Speaker 9 reflect harsh strategies against antisemitism, including deportation and criminal measures, while Speaker 9 notes threats against those who push antisemitic conspiracy theories. Speaker 16–17 recount legal actions against antisemitic rhetoric and antisemitism lawsuits; Speaker 18 describes the J7 diaspora network meeting to share information and best practices; Speaker 19–20 advocate reform of education and even limiting the First Amendment to protect it, arguing for control over speech. Speaker 3 and Speaker 20 discuss enforcement and punishment for anti-Israel or antisemitic speech; Speaker 1 highlights training 20,000 officers annually in extremism and hate via partnerships with law enforcement going back to the FBI’s origins. Speaker 29 calls opponents “a small bunch of wannabe Nazis” and asserts intent to pursue justice; Speaker 0 closes by proclaiming that history remembers action, not denial of hatred, and that we are on the cusp of a new age where technology’s powerful benefits can drive positive outcomes in agriculture, health, transportation, and other fields, enabling Israel to become a primary power rather than a secondary one.

I have been called to join the digital warfare task force, fighting to defend Israel in the media. Misinformation, blind hate, anti-Semitism, and lies are spreading, and we must stand together to fight them. Join me in taking a bold stand for Israel, as this battle is not just ours, but yours too. Together, we will win this war. Thank you.

Stop Antisemitism was built for confronting the global explosion of Jew hatred unleashed since the attacks of ten seven. Since that day, we have featured more than 1,000 antisemites on our platforms—not theorized about them, not quietly documented them, but featured them publicly, clearly, and with evidence. The results speak for themselves: approximately 400 of these Jew haters have faced real consequences including firings, suspensions, and expulsions. More than 300 remain in an active investigatory state across universities, corporations, DEI departments, unions, hospitals, nonprofits, and yes, federal government agencies. And five arrests to date tied directly to threats and violence of antisemitic conduct we helped expose. This is what accountability looks like. This is what action looks like. This is what pushing back hard looks like against the tidal wave of hate that has consumed The United States and global population. From our founding, Stop Antisemitism has operated on one guiding belief: Antisemitism thrives when there are no consequences. So we created consequences, a lot of them. We created visibility. We turned the spotlight towards those who targeted our community, making silence impossible. On campuses where Jewish students were hunted through libraries, where professors glorified Hamas and Hezbollah terrorists, where mobs shut down our buildings and administrators hid under desks, we stepped in. We documented the offenders. We worked with attorneys, lawmakers, and victim families, and we ensured the message was not unmistakable: If you target Jewish students, your actions will not disappear into the darkness. We will shine a light on you that thanks to Google and SEO, follow you for the rest of your life. When you look for a job, when you look for a spouse, when you look for a nanny, when you look for anything, our work will always be documented. Again, thanks to Google and SEO. In corporations where DEI leaders smeared Israel, excused Hamas, we pressured CEOs; some resigned, many were terminated, but policies were changed thankfully from governmental to art institutions. Online, where anonymous accounts spread violent threats, we traced patterns, elevated evidence, and worked with authorities leading to arrests from Florida, South Carolina, New York, California, and Texas. And we're not slowing down sadly. Today, Stop Antisemitism, I'm proud to say, runs one of the most robust antisemitic enforcement operations in The United States, monitoring campuses, digital networks, activist groups, and public officials, documenting incidents in real time and mobilizing millions of people, of allies that are quietly by our side. But the fight is bigger than the exposure, and it's about securing a future—A future where Jewish students can walk across a quad without being screamed at. A future where employers understand that anti Semitism is not activism. It's bigotry and it will cause you to lose your job. A future where fact, not propaganda, shapes policy. A future where global institutions from Google to chat, GPT, from governments to universities to media, finally treats Jew hatred with the seriousness of other minority-targeted hate. To get there, we need three things: action, real action as I listed; accountability; relentless vigilance, because antisemitism does not take breaks. It doesn't wait for elections. It doesn't disappear because we are exhausted and tired, and when I tell you myself and my team are exhausted and tired, that's the least of it. Stop antisemitism has never been more essential, more strategic, or more effective than it is now, but we cannot do this alone. The demand, the volume of tips, the number of investigations, sadly, it continues to grow instead of decrease. If we want a safer future for the Jewish people, this is the moment to stand together and act. We have to push harder to make it clear that Jewish safety is a nonnegotiable. Tonight, I'm asking you to always be in the fight with us, not just in spirit, but in true action. Participate in calls to action. Write letters to your governmental officials. Speak to the teachers and the college administrators that are making, if it's not your friends and kids, it's making other community members feel unsafe. When we act, lives change, And antisemites learn, sometimes for the very first time in their lives and history, that targeting Jews will come at a price, and together we can ensure that Jew hatred never goes unanswered again. As a former refugee from The USSR, I say this with all of my heart, God bless The United States, God bless Israel, and I'm Israel High. Thank you so much.

Meta’s efforts to engage with the Jewish diaspora and address antisemitism on its platforms are highlighted through a newly created role focused on the Jewish diaspora. The speaker emphasizes that Meta’s commitment to addressing antisemitism has remained steadfast, especially after October 7, and asserts that Meta’s policies are industry-leading in protecting Jewish people and Israelis on its platforms. The company’s community standards include policies that prevent harassment, violence, and incitement, and feature a robust framework to combat antisemitism. The hateful conduct policy includes specific protections for Israelis and Jews. Holocaust denial and distortion were banned back in 2020, with Meta’s approach shifting industry thinking by designating denial as hate speech rather than misinformation. The emphasis was not only on facts but on protecting people from harmful conduct. Meta banned content with harmful stereotypes about Jews, such as the claim that Jews run the world or other major institutions. The policies were updated to recognize that the term Zionist can be used as a proxy for Jews and Israelis. Meta banned content claiming Zionists run the world or control the media, and it does not allow for dehumanizing comparisons of Zionists. The speaker notes finding a delicate balance between safety and expression. The role is intended to ensure that the voices of Israelis and the Jewish community are heard in the policy making process.

The system covers the entire Internet, including social networks like Facebook and Twitter. It identifies 200,000 suspect posts and tweets related to antisemitism daily, using artificial intelligence and machine learning. Approximately 10,000 antisemitic posts are identified each day. This information will now be made public, serving as a deterrent to antisemitism. We will be able to determine which city has the highest antisemitic internet activity and identify the top 10 antisemitic tweets and Twitter users. By understanding the causes behind spikes in antisemitism, we can take action. The command center in Tel Aviv is already operational, analyzing and sharing information with local authorities and municipalities to address antisemitic activities. This marks the official launch of the system.

Within these pillars, protect, advocate, educate, we are innovating. We are trying new ways to have an impact in the fight against anti Semitism. So let's talk about what that looks like. Within the first pillar, protect, not only has the team at the Center on Extremism expanded its ranks with data scientists and software engineers, but we use cutting edge AI tools to analyze the endless online chatter. And then when we identify salient trends or material threats, we route them to whomever may need it, could be journalists, policymakers, and very often law enforcement. Now I can't talk about all the times we do that. I can't divulge what's happened with every piece of intelligence shared, but just know there are real dangers that have been averted. Serious bad guys that have been put behind bars all over the world, And the information generated by Orin Siegel and the entire team on the Center on Extremism, it makes our communities safer.

A detective in Pierce Street spoke to me about their active engagement with social media companies, specifically TikTok, Meta (formerly Facebook and Instagram), and Twitter. They mentioned that TikTok and Meta were responsive and took down offensive posts, while X (unspecified company) did not fulfill their own community standards. This lack of responsibility led to the establishment of a commission to hold these companies accountable. Rest assured, the Gardai (Irish police) were fully involved and engaged with the situation, directly communicating with the social media companies.

The speakers claim that graduation speakers are spreading blood libels and social media influencers are making baseless claims about Jews, science, and Israelis. They express concern that this could worsen and call for tech platforms to stop lifting up these voices, elected officials to speak out, and people to stand with their Jewish friends. Social media is described as a super spreader of antisemitism, racism, misogyny, and misinformation. Companies like X and Meta are said to have retreated from content moderation, and community notes are not a solution. The speakers believe it is time for government to step up and regulate these companies, which they consider monopolistic. They advocate for these companies to demonstrate accountability like other media businesses and remove Nazis and anti-Zionists from their platforms.

The speaker describes an effort to educate and elevate content. They mention a partnership with Google, initiated after observing highly distorted information at the top of climate change search results. The goal is to be more proactive in providing accurate information. They state, “We own the science, and we think that the world should know it.” They add, “The platforms themselves also do.”

The ADL works with various companies in Silicon Valley, including Apple, Zoom, Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, and Twitter, to address the issue of hate speech on their platforms. They have expressed concern about Twitter allowing toxic content to persist, which has led to real-world violence in places like Pittsburgh, Poway, El Paso, and Washington, D.C. The ADL urges companies to use their innovation to combat hate speech. They have observed that anti-Semitic speech remains on the platform for longer periods, and toxic content is not being removed as quickly as before. The ADL emphasizes the importance of all users, including journalists and watchdog organizations, working together to make Twitter a safe space, as freedom of speech should not be used to slander or incite violence.

We activated our crisis protocol for the first time as a global company, uniting to combat antisemitism on our platform. This experience highlighted the importance of our actions and the need to collaborate with law enforcement, military, and various organizations worldwide to protect Jewish communities. It became clear that we needed to set a strong example for others to follow.

During a congressional hearing on antisemitism, the speaker admits to not fully considering the gravity of a call for the genocide of Jewish people on their university campus. They acknowledge that such a call is a horrific act of violence and should be seen as a threat, harassment, or intimidation. The speaker emphasizes the need to reevaluate their university's policies in light of the increasing hate and intolerance in the world. They commit to creating a safe and supportive environment for all members of their community.

We stopped playing defense and have moved to offense. You see this in our focus on the courts. In the past twelve months, ADL has filed more lawsuits than the prior one hundred and twelve years against extremist groups, elite universities, public companies, school districts, and state sponsors of terror. We've launched innovative products to intercept antisemitism before it takes root, whether in the boardroom or in chat rooms, large language models or academic associations, in Wikipedia entries or WhatsApp chats. This work matters, not just for the Jewish people, but for all of society.

Over the past decade, anti-Semitism has shifted online, making it easier to generate and spread hateful content. To address this, the Ministry of Diaspora Affairs developed a system that monitors anti-Semitism on the entire internet, focusing on Facebook and Twitter. Using artificial intelligence, the system identifies around 10,000 anti-Semitic posts daily out of 200,000 suspect posts. By making this information public, it aims to shame individuals and deter anti-Semitism. Additionally, a command center in Tel Aviv analyzes the data and takes action, such as notifying law enforcement or city officials about specific instances. The speaker urges Facebook and Twitter to take responsibility and not allow anti-Semitism under the guise of freedom of speech.

Speaker 0 describes a prior incident where almost every tweet from a day was flagged, claiming there is "one specific group of people that you can talk you can't talk bad about" and stating "it's illegal here on X." They caution viewers to avoid saying certain words in the video to prevent account nukes. They reference a post by someone identified as propaganda and co, noting: "you can't deport everyone, including whites, but you just can't deport the Jews." The speaker quotes the post: "deport all whites, deport all Hispanics, deport all blacks, deport all Muslims." They then point out that, "as soon as he said deport all Jews, immediately, visibility limited." The speaker highlights that the post may "violate x rules against hateful conduct." They respond with a defiant stance: "So what? I I can hate on I can hate on blacks, Muslims, Hispanics, whites, but god's chosen people. They're off limits, obviously." The speaker emphasizes their perception of a double standard. The speaker asserts: "Be a good little goyum. Pay your taxes. Keep your mouth shut. Don't speak out against anything that would be considered hateful over here on x because that'll get you nuked." The language conveys a claim that there is selective enforcement and censorship on the platform, with Jews described as uniquely protected and off-limits for criticism, while other groups are portrayed as targets for hateful statements. The overall narrative centers on censorship, perceived hypocrisy, and the idea that certain groups can be criticized while others cannot, according to the speaker's interpretation of platform rules and enforcement.

The speaker describes activating a crisis protocol at the company in response to a global event. It was a time when the new company came together and realized the importance of combating antisemitism on the platform. Actions included learning, working with law enforcement globally, working with the military globally, and collaborating with various organizations to protect Jewish people. The speaker emphasizes the importance of X setting an example for others to follow in these efforts.

We stopped playing defense and have moved to offense. You see this in our focus on the courts. In the past twelve months, ADL has filed more lawsuits than in the prior one hundred and twelve years against extremist groups, elite universities, public companies, school districts, and state sponsors of terror. We've launched innovative products to intercept antisemitism before it takes root, whether in the boardroom or in chat rooms, large language models or academic associations, in Wikipedia entries or WhatsApp chats. This work matters, not just for the Jewish people, but for all of society.

Jonathan asks for commentary on Nick Fuentes, what countermeasures are effective, and what the government’s role should be in being critical of such a platform. The respondent explains that Nick Fuentes’ second name is Joseph, and that Fuentes is a Hispanic person described as an open, unapologetic racist, homophobe, and anti-Semite. He notes that Fuentes has been incredibly effective at spreading his message thanks to X and social media, which act as super spreaders of anti-Semitism and hate, making Fuentes like patient zero. He points out that it didn’t help when former President Trump had Fuentes over for dinner at Mar-a-Lago, and he criticizes those in power who don’t renounce Fuentes. JD Vance has done so, but the current right faces a challenge with elevated bad voices like Fuentes, Tucker Carlson, and Candace Owens, while there are good voices on the right such as Ted Cruz, Ben Shapiro, and Mark Levin who push back on figures like Speaker Johnson and the revolting lunatics. To defeat rising anti-Semitism on the right, he believes it must come from the right; to defeat rising anti-Zionism on the left, it must come from people on the left. At AADL, the goal is to provide data and tools and to operate behind the scenes rather than publicly targeting Fuentes or Hassan Piker; the speaker even calls Hassan Piker “Hamas Piker” and notes his large platform on Twitch, Steam, YouTube, and Instagram. The speaker emphasizes working to get platforms to enforce terms of service to pull down the most offensive hate speech, or compel action from the platforms. However, he also stresses the need for people on the right to take down figures like Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes, and for people on the left to support similar efforts. The second speaker adds that in a sermon about the nuance of every human being, they did not mean Nick Fuentes.

I have been called to join the digital warfare task force, fighting to defend Israel in the media. There is a battle between good and evil, with misinformation, blind hate, anti-Semitism, and lies. We must fight together and stand on the right side of history. Take a bold stand for Israel, and we will win this war. Thank you.

The speaker acknowledges that brands have the power to make their own decisions. They clarify that they have never accused Elon Musk or Twitter of being anti-Semitic, but they express concern about the platform's handling of hate speech. The speaker admits that they are not publicly or privately talking to advertisers, but rather engaging with Twitter's management to help improve the platform. They address the critique of seeking a role at Twitter or donations, stating that it is unfair to suggest that expressing outrage over anti-Semitism is a shakedown. The speaker mentions their efforts to work with various platforms, including Twitter, to make improvements.

The speaker recounts that after a one-minute clip arguing that the Holocaust is a myth went viral on X, accumulating 48,000 views within a day, X reduced its visibility, making it undiscoverable and unshareable. The text displayed by Ex Grok artificial dumbness asserts several false points, which the speaker says are all wrong: - The Holocaust handbooks contain 54 volumes, not 39. - The Courier Report contains nothing about the number of presumably murdered Jews, and nothing at all approaching 6,000,000. - The Holocaust death toll cannot be ascertained by comparing prewar with postwar Jewish population data in Europe. In between, there was a massive Jewish exodus, with millions leaving Europe and migrating to Palestine/Israel, the US, and many other countries. The speaker claims to have demonstrated the flawed nature of mainstream demographic studies on this topic. - Einsatzgruppen reports tally some 750,000 shootings, not over a million, and that topic was not even mentioned in the speaker’s clip. - The cremation capacities of extermination facilities are a technical question; they do not corroborate exterminations in gas chambers using Zyklon B, which the speaker characterizes as an entirely different map. Additionally, the memo referenced is described as false on numerous accounts. The speaker states that the actual documented and technically possible maximum cremation capacity of all Auschwitz crematoria was around 1,000 corpses per day, noting that this is only theoretical since the facilities were never operable all at the same time; therefore, the practical capacity at any given moment was much lower. The speaker argues that whatever the number, cremation capacity is not proof of mass murder, or else the capacities of any major city’s crematoria would prove mass murder. The speaker concludes by urging readers to “check out these websites for more.”

The speaker holds a unique role at a tech company, focusing on the Jewish diaspora. Their work involves empowering Jewish communities globally and addressing their concerns on a local level. A key aspect of this role is removing hate speech and content targeting Jewish people, including Holocaust denial and harmful stereotypes. The speaker emphasizes working with global partners to refine content policies and address coded antisemitism. Beyond content removal, the speaker highlights using platforms to promote authoritative information. A partnership with the World Jewish Congress and UNESCO directs users searching for Holocaust-related terms to factual resources. The speaker also considers how to address antisemitism and promote education within emerging technologies like VR, AR, and XR, collectively known as the metaverse.

Speaker 0 explains that last week, leaders of the world’s seven largest Jewish communities convened in Australia as part of the twenty twenty five J Seven summit. This summit is organized by the ADL as part of the J Seven task force to combat antisemitism, and it brings together a convening of representative bodies of the largest Jewish communities on Earth. Speaker 1 describes the J Seven as comprising the seven largest diaspora communities. They meet every other week via Zoom to share information and best practices, including what has worked for their communities, what hasn’t worked, and what might work elsewhere. They share tips, draft legislation that might work in other countries, or discuss different litigation. A central element has been this consultation, where they can learn from each other, learn the trends that are coming in, learn the techniques that others have used successfully, and what might be coming their way. The point is that “what happened in Montreal could happen in Melbourne, and what happens in New York or London or Paris, will make its way to Buenos Aires.” That is the first emphasis. Second, they speak in one voice, in certain aspects on key advocacy. For example, when they left Australia, their call to action was on the Australian government to move forward the special envoy Jillian Siegel’s plan on antisemitism, which had been stalled for a number of months, to accept it and to implement it. It was significant that the leaders of the seven largest diaspora communities went to Australia to show solidarity publicly with the community, with government leaders, and with the media, and also to make this joint call to action. Finally, they have meetings that are some off the record, some on the record, with world leaders in which they share their community’s concerns and call for action. Thus, the J Seven is described as both a really important body for consultation and learning from each other as well as an effective tool when they can come together and speak in one voice.

We stopped playing defense and have moved to offense. You see this in our focus on the courts. In the past twelve months, ADL has filed more lawsuits than the prior one hundred and twelve years against extremist groups, elite universities, public companies, school districts, and state sponsors of terror. We've launched innovative products to intercept antisemitism before it takes root, whether in the boardroom or in chat rooms, large language models or academic associations, in Wikipedia entries or WhatsApp chats. This work matters, not just for the Jewish people, but for all of society.