reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. It is true the anti defamation league was part and parcel with Black Lives Matter. It is true that some of the largest financiers of left wing anti white causes have been Jewish Americans. They went all in on woke, and it wasn't just ADL. It was some of the top Jewish organizations in the country that have done that. Mark Rowan, Leon Kaufman. Can we get that full list? It's very powerful. And Tucker Carlson reinforces this. We have Candace Owens coming up next hour, and Tucker Carlson mentions that Jewish Americans have primarily been financing cultural Marxist ideas. Tucker Carlson is completely correct by saying this, that the philosophical foundation of anti whiteness has been largely financed by Jewish donors in the country.

I began listening to voices like Ben Shapiro, Matt Walsh, and Jordan Peterson, which introduced me to new perspectives I hadn't considered before. I appreciated their boldness and found myself passionately discussing these ideas, often ranting in my car. However, this shift in my views came at a cost; I ended up losing my boyfriend, all my friends, and my job. It was a significant and isolating change in my life.

I don't understand why left-leaning media, which some say is predominantly Jewish, labels people as white supremacists. According to my Jewish friends, this perspective exists. But why is there a perceived animosity towards white individuals? It seems to stem from what some call "woke" culture and virtue signaling.

Speaker 0 asserts that kindergarten classes look “completely disgustingly changed” and that those children are not belonging there, calling them “anchor babies” and alleging they are “chemical weapons” and “biological chemical weapons” sent to destroy the fabric of the country. He adds that these people do not vote like white Christian men and vote against the interests of “small town, small America.” He then says, “White people in America, you will be replaced and your children will be black Muslims if you don't stand up now,” claims that “AIPAC is one of the main components to the people at the head of Hollywood that are brainwashing your children to vote Democrat, to take your guns, and to take your freedom,” and declares that it is time to fight back. Speaker 2 responds by stating that there is a war being fought against “our people,” and it is “in our school systems,” “in our cafeterias,” and “in our grocery stores,” and that replacement is happening “on our phones,” and “in our hospitals.” He calls for fighting back, organizing, and having more children, and urges turning minds and hearts toward Christ. Speaker 1 encouragements follow: “We need to stand up,” and “We need to stand tall.” Speaker 1 then proclaims, “I’m proud to be white, and I’m proud to be American,” and calls others to action: “America, fight back. Stand strong. Be brave.” The speakers exhort others to inspire those around them, and to affirm faith with “Amen.” Speaker 2 closes with “God bless America.”

Speaker 0 greets with “Shalom” and asks listeners to send a donation to TR News to help us wipe out the white race. They say, “If there was a war tomorrow, which there will be, because I’ll probably start at the end of the session.” They add, “If there was a war and it kicked off, I would be there on the front line fighting for Israel.”

I don't get why left-leaning media, which I hear is mostly Jewish, labels people as white supremacists. Did you really say that? Yeah, I mean, my Jewish friends say it is. But why do they seem to dislike white guys? It's just woke culture, man. It's all about virtue signaling and that kind of stuff. I just don't understand it.

The speaker cites a poll claiming that 'nearly half of all blacks, are not okay with white people' and calls that a hate group: 'that's a hate group. That's a hate group.' He urges white people to 'get the hell away from black people. Just get the fuck away.' He describes moving to a neighborhood with a 'very low black population' because 'there's a high correlation between the density,' and cites Don Lemon to say 'even Don Lemon sees a big difference in your own quality of living based on where you live and who's there.' He argues, 'it makes no sense whatsoever as a white citizen of America to try to help black citizens anymore' and that helping Black America is 'no longer a rational impulse.' He adds, 'It's over. Don't don't even think it's worth trying. Totally not trying.' 'And there we go. You didn't expect that today, did you? But those who don't wanna focus on education, you just need to get away from them. Just get as much distance as you can. That's my'

Speaker 0 frames the Trump phenomenon as a 'transcendent belief system' and 'the belief system that offers you the answer to everything, the past, the present, the future,' with 'the end justifies the means belief system.' Speaker 1 argues the ruling belief system is 'grounded in racism' and 'presents an image of bringing the country back to a white majority and white power,' noting many bought in while others followed. He calls it a national-scale cult and says, for many MAGA supporters, 'make America great again' meant 'getting rid of the black and brown people.' He adds the country 'was founded on racism, has been built on racism, and nothing's ever really been done to sort of wipe that out of people's psyches.' To the MAGA crowd, 'they don't care what the price of eggs is.' He sees this as 'salvation' and that brutality and cruelty have accelerated this year.

Speaker 0 argues that white Americans will soon be a minority, and that this is great. Speaker 1 counters that whites will not be the majority and describes it as an exciting transformation and evolution, a progress of the country. Speaker 2 states that whites will be a minority very soon and says, “I'm okay with that.” Speaker 1 asks, if the white working class is in trouble, whether new Americans should be brought in. Speaker 3 predicts America will look very different in a hundred years, with racial labels becoming less distinct (“You're black, you're white, you're Hispanic, you're Puerto Rican, whatever”), and says that complexity will be good in the end. Speaker 2 contends that white Americans feel they are losing their country and ownership, and that they are, in the end, not the future. Speaker 3 asserts that for the first time in American history, the number of white people went down; “White population is declining for the first time in history in America.” Speaker 3 cautions that white people will not be the majority in the country anymore, noting it will be the first generation with whites as a minority. Speaker 1 proclaims, “Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.” Speaker 3 proclaims that to abolish whiteness is to abolish white people. Speaker 1 contends that white people are committed to being villains in the aggregate. Speaker 3 declares, “We gotta take these motherfuckers out.” Speaker 2 asks whether it was the duty of every good revolutionary to kill all newborn white babies. Speaker 3 responds, “We have to kill white people,” and, when pressed, mirrors that sentiment with, “When we say we wanna kill whites, we don't really mean we wanna kill whites. We do. We have to exterminate white people off of the face of the planet to solve this problem.” Speaker 1 comments, “When do we start killing white people?” and then, “start killing all white folks, but maybe?” Speaker 3 reiterates the extermination goal, stating, “We have to exterminate white people off of the face of the planet to solve this problem.” Speaker 5 adds, “An unrelenting stream of immigration. Nonstop. Nonstop. Folks like me who were Caucasian of European descent will be in an absolute minority in The United States Of America. Absolute minority.” He concludes that this shift is not a bad thing and calls it a source of strength.

Speaker 0 explains he started anti-Trump as a libertarian and, by March/April 2016, went 'all in' for Trump, who he says 'red pilled' him. He argues Trump understood you must 'fight the mainstream media' to seize power. He calls his 'slice of America' a dying breed and says 'America was a white country. It's becoming a non white country through immigration.' He supports 'America first' and questions why 'Israel gets all this foreign aid' and why 'If you put Israel over America, you should go live in Israel,' a tweet Shapiro labeled 'accusing Jews of dual loyalty' as antisemitic. He recounts Leadership Institute training, a Lebanese instructor who rejected him, and a student who secretly recorded him saying 'I wanna have a white wife. I wanna have white kids,' a clip Ben Shapiro retweeted. He cites death threats at his door, reflects on mortality after Charlie Kirk's death, and argues we must fight evil intensely while avoiding violence.

The speaker recounts a toxic, self-contradictory narrative about trying to save the white race. He says “daddy” decided the best way to save the white race was to follow “a gay Mexican federal informant,” calling that the smart move, but notes that the plans never worked out. He claims he told this to Billy and asserts his father’s efforts were earnest but futile, despite “super chats” sent to the gay Mexican federal informant. He claims he voted for Laura Loomer because he was told to, but says that didn’t work out. He says he believed in a mass racial awakening, imagining stadiums full of white kids shouting “hi, Hitler.” He states he believed in emulating figures he describes as “literal white slavers,” Andrew Tate and Tristan Tate, and says he really believed in the plan promoted by the informant. The speaker mentions belief in supporting “the mentally ill guy,” who allegedly hit himself in the face with a hammer, became an OnlyFans agent, and bought a club in partnership with an Israeli mobster while using drugs that made him infertile, and that this was something to promote to other white people. He says he really believed in that plan the gay Mexican federal informant was telling them. Despite his efforts, he insists that “Daddy” tried real hard, but things kept not working out for white people, and he doesn’t know why. He recalls being told the country was cooked and that demographics could not be fixed, and that they should embrace them and vote for Democrats, but he says he thought this would save the white race, and it didn’t. He claims he did what he was told about real-life actions: he called people feds, discouraged them, and tried to ruin their lives. He recalls the memes and the era of “No e girls” jokes, saying they sat around and whispered about “no e girls” and felt something magical, yet it did not save the white race. He ends with an expletive, insisting he really fucking tried.

How many of you used to vote Democrat? And how many have always voted Republican? We have a great mix here. I grew up as a Democrat but, after studying the issues, I realized I was actually a conservative. It's important to me, as a Black man, to have the freedom to choose how I vote. I find it racist when society dictates my political beliefs. Over the years, I've learned to think for myself and have come to appreciate conservative policies, which is why I am where I am today.

And then I started listening to Ben Shapiro, then Matt Walsh, then Jordan Peterson, all these people. I was like, these are all new views I've never heard. And I was like, I like what these people have to say. They're bold. And then I started going on rants in my car. As soon as I started talking about these things, I lost my boyfriend, lost all my friends, had no job. I mean, truly, I was completely alone.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about past tweets and NPR content. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 believes America is addicted to white supremacy, if America believes in black plunder and white democracy, and if white people inherently feel superior. Speaker 1 says their thinking has evolved and denies holding those beliefs now, also stating they don't recall some tweets. Speaker 0 confronts Speaker 1 with their past tweets about reparations, asking if white people should pay them. Speaker 1 claims the tweet wasn't about fiscal reparations. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 believes looting is morally wrong, and Speaker 1 confirms that it is. Speaker 0 then questions Speaker 1 about NPR content, including a book called In Defense of Looting, an article about gender queer dinosaur enthusiasts, and an editorial stating that fear of fatness is more harmful than actual fat. Speaker 1 says they are unfamiliar with some of the content. Speaker 0 accuses NPR of editorializing and promoting garbage, vowing to defund them.

Speaker 0: Hi, Michiganders, specifically Detroiters. Do you guys care that Charlie Kirk has passed away? Yeah. I didn't think so because my district is primarily black people, and Charlie Kirk said awful things about black people. So, no, I think my district will like me because I advocate for them as a white person. So

Speaker 1: I believe that together we can make America great again. To secure a better future for your children and your grandchildren and to make America great again. I want to attack these problems and make America great again. It's time for another comeback. Time to make America great again. Speaker 0: Monica puffed on your cigar so hard the hypocrisy smoke is still lingering, decades later. Straight up called her the dog whistle. Speaker 1: That message where yeah. I'll give you America great again is if you're a white southerner, you know exactly what it means, don't you? What it means is I give you economy you had fifty years ago, and I'll move you back up on the social totem pole and other people down. Speaker 0: Either it was racist when he said it or it's not racist when Trump said it. Pick a lane. You can't make this shit up.

Speaker 0 claimed that white people make up 10% of the world's population, and that in California, the white population decreased by 71% in 73 years, which "kinda sounds like genocide." He questioned why violent crime and murder rates by race are not available from Sacramento. Speaker 1 interrupted, calling the statements racist and inappropriate for public discourse, and ended the call. Speaker 1 stated that racist tropes and stereotypes have no place in civic discourse.

Speaker 1: "The narrative that they have pushed forward in the last ten years is that there is a relentless assault on against black people be on behalf of white people, and the data does not show that." Speaker 1: "White individuals are actually more likely to be attacked, especially even per capita, by black individuals in this country." Speaker 3: "it's just pure race race mongering, hate mongering. It's wrong." Speaker 3: "Where is the George Floyd policing act? It didn't pass." Speaker 0: "The media doesn't care about this, and we should start asking why." Speaker 1: "All of a sudden, when we make the left live up to their own standard of rules, there is complete silence by the entire American media."