reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker will debunk myths while eating an animal-based diet of organs, meat, fruit, honey, and raw dairy. One myth is that being in the sun is bad. Ancestors sought the sun, and it feels good because the skin makes endorphins, nitric oxide, and cholesterol-containing molecules that are healthy and allow for laminar blood flow. The sun is a valuable resource that humans have always sought. The speaker encourages others to enjoy vitamin D from ultraviolet light and to not fear the sun.

The speaker discusses the misconception that sunlight causes skin cancer, emphasizing that lack of sun exposure can actually increase the risk. They explain that UVB is not the main culprit, but rather UVA. Sunscreens that only block UVB can lead to vitamin D deficiency, increasing cancer risk. Excessive use of sunscreen with harmful chemicals can harm the skin and potentially cause skin cancer. The speaker advises against washing off vitamin D-producing oils on the skin immediately after sun exposure. They also highlight the importance of maintaining healthy skin bacteria by avoiding excessive use of soap.

Dermatology's war against the sun may be disastrous, as benign skin cancers are caused by sun exposure, while the deadliest skin cancers are linked to lack of sunlight. Sunlight is arguably the most important nutrient, and avoiding it doubles one's rate of dying and increases cancer risk. The dermatology profession rebranded itself as skin cancer fighters, becoming a high-paying specialty, yet skin cancer deaths haven't substantially changed. Sunlight is critical for mental health; nurses lacking sun exposure had worse mental health. Higher solar UVB exposure was linked to half the incidence of breast cancer in women and fatal prostate cancer in men. A study found sun avoidant women were 60% more likely to die. The largest benefit of sun exposure was seen in smokers. The American Academy of Dermatology says skin cancer is the most common cancer in the US, but most diagnosed skin cancers are benign. They encourage staying out of tanning beds and using sunscreen. Basal cell carcinoma, linked to sun exposure, rarely metastasizes and has a near-zero fatality rate.

Speaker 0 recounts a severe sun poisoning incident at Bondi Beach after refusing sunscreen offered by a stranger. Speaker 1 describes a method for tanning without sunscreen used in Phuket: 15 minutes of sun exposure on the front, 15 minutes on the back, followed by time under an umbrella. Speaker 1 claims this approach allows for a gradual tan and extended sun exposure later in the week. Speaker 1 suggests using a watch to time sun exposure and implies that common sense is needed. Speaker 0 acknowledges lacking common sense.

Speaker 0 recounts a severe sun poisoning incident at Bondi Beach after refusing sunscreen. Speaker 1 advises against sunscreen, instead recommending timed sun exposure: 15 minutes on the front, 15 minutes on the back, followed by shade. Speaker 1 claims this method, used in Phuket, resulted in a golden brown tan and increased sun tolerance over a week. Speaker 1 suggests using common sense regarding sun exposure, to which Speaker 0 jokingly admits a deficiency.

The speaker discusses the misconception that sunlight causes skin cancer. They explain that lack of sunshine actually leads to skin cancer and that UVB is not the main cause, but rather UVA. They mention that using sunscreens that only block UVB can lead to vitamin D deficiency, which increases the risk of cancer. The speaker emphasizes the importance of maintaining normal vitamin D levels, as 77% of all cancers can be avoided with adequate levels. They also mention that countries with high UV radiation have lower rates of skin cancer compared to countries with less sun exposure. The speaker warns against the harmful effects of sunscreens, which can contain carcinogens and lead to skin cancer. They advise against using soap immediately after sun exposure to allow the absorption of vitamin D and to preserve the beneficial bacteria on the skin.

The speaker presents a combined stance of debunking a common belief about sun exposure while endorsing an animal-based dietary pattern. He frames his approach around a breakfast described as animal-based, noting it includes organs, meat, fruit, honey, and raw dairy, and situates this meal within a broader claim that sun exposure complements such a diet. A central point introduced is the explicit counter to a widely held assumption: “Common myth, being in the sun is bad for you.” He argues that sun exposure aligns with human history, stating that “your ancestors sought out the sun” and that this pursuit has a rationale, given that the sun “feels good on my skin.” In advocating for sun exposure, the speaker enumerates physiological effects he associates with sunlight. He asserts that on his skin, the sun helps him generate endorphins, nitric oxide, and “cholesterol containing molecules that are healthy and allow for laminar blood flow in our arteries.” By linking these biochemical effects to vascular health, he casts sunlight as a driver of beneficial bodily processes. He then reinforces the value of sunlight by claiming that “The sun is something that humans have always sought” and labeling it “a valuable resource,” underscoring the long-standing human relationship with ultraviolet light. The speaker ties the sun to nutrient intake by describing how he will enjoy a meal—“this animal based breakfast, feasting on these foods”—while simultaneously benefiting from “the abundance of this vitamin D from ultraviolet light.” This pairing positions sun-derived vitamin D as a natural complement to the animal-based foods he consumes, reinforcing a cohesive narrative that diet and sun exposure together support well-being. The overall message culminates in an inviting directive: “And you should too.” The speaker concludes with a clear exhortation to embrace sun exposure, encapsulated in the final admonition, “Do not fear the sun, my friends.”

The speaker aims to debunk myths while consuming an animal-based diet of organs, meat, fruit, honey, and raw dairy. A common myth is that sun exposure is harmful. The speaker claims ancestors sought the sun, and it feels good because the skin produces endorphins, nitric oxide, and cholesterol-containing molecules that promote healthy blood flow. The speaker advocates embracing the sun as a valuable resource while enjoying an animal-based breakfast to benefit from vitamin D. The speaker encourages listeners not to fear the sun.

People get energy from sunlight, and those in the sun eat less food. Children should be outside in the sun without shirts, running barefoot on the grass to get electrons, which is free energy. The electron transfer chain in mitochondria is powered by the sun. The idea that the sun causes cancer is false. The sun is a nutrient that makes all life exist and charges everything. Sunscreen contains carcinogenic chemicals. The speaker, age 51, has never used sunscreen, has had no work done, eats meat, and drives a convertible to maximize sun exposure because it makes them younger. The government is lying. Do the opposite of what the government says.

The speaker discusses the benefits of sunlight, including its positive effects on heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, blood sugar, lactic acid levels, energy, strength, endurance, stress tolerance, and the blood's ability to absorb and carry oxygen. They question the use of petroleum-based SPF products that block these benefits and emphasize the importance of sunlight for our overall health. The speaker also mentions the influence of marketing in promoting these products. They recommend a book called "Health and Light" for further information on the healing properties of light.

Humans ask how long they can be in the sun because they've been brainwashed to fear it, unlike animals. The sun provides UVB, which has two main functions: manufacturing vitamin D, only one of thousands of photoproducts, and triggering warning signs when it's time to get out of the sun. The feeling of warmth indicates it's time for shade. Sunscreen prevents UVB from doing its job, causing people to stay in the sun too long and be exposed to damaging parts of the solar spectrum. Listening to your skin and avoiding sunscreen allows nature to guide sun exposure.

A Midwestern doctor discusses the negative impact of avoiding sunlight, linking lack of sun exposure to increased cancer risk and mortality rates. Sunlight is crucial for mental health and may reduce the risk of various cancers. The American Academy of Dermatology emphasizes the importance of sun protection to prevent skin cancer, but most cases are treatable if detected early. Basal cell carcinoma, caused by sun exposure, is not typically life-threatening. Sunlight avoidance may increase the risk of dying, especially among smokers. The speaker questions the dermatology profession's focus on skin cancer prevention and highlights the benefits of moderate sun exposure.

The speaker argues that tanning with a UV bulb has benefits and presents tanning as a solution while noting that government actions block out the sun. They claim that during Obama's administration tanning beds were targeted to be taxed to eliminate them, and that this tax “worked,” causing many people to stop tanning because they feared skin issues. The speaker contends the real factors were the lotions and what people are eating, and asserts that the government targets anything that could make people healthy, such as the sun or UV bulbs, especially in opposition to “big harma.” They recount a claim about Kellogg’s, stating Kellogg's was the creator of the first tanning bed in the 1890s, supposedly to find a solution to diabetes, and suggesting his cereal was causing diabetes while he actually wanted a solution. The speaker then references the early 1900s, noting that hospitals would put people out in the sun and that this was a natural method of healing, contrasting it with injections, radiation, chemotherapy, and pills, implying sun exposure was the preferred healing method.

UV light lowers blood pressure. UV light increases the efficiency of the heart. UV light improves EKG. UV light balances cholesterol. UV light assists in weight loss. UV light is a treatment for skin conditions. UV light is also an effective treatment for many disorders. Going back to light therapy of 1933 in Germany where they used to heal people with light, then you go UV light increases the level of hormones. People suffering from low testosterone or altered estrogen sitting in the sun. Then we go UV light activates important skin skin hormones such as vitamin d, natural sources. Now why do they tell people to stay out of the sun? Because all these industries exist to keep making money on the people. And if you tell people that UV is toxic and you better stay out of that sun, well, then these industries continue to keep just going about. And that's what we see because these industries have been going on for a long time. Hundred about a hundred years of being told lies. And all we're doing, debunking it one step at a time.

Speaker 0 argues that our ancestors did not spend all day inside looking at a cell phone; our eyes were designed to interact with the sun’s light. The speaker claims that in 1980 the introduction of “sunphobia” with sunscreen and sunglasses, which look cool but block light, marked a shift, and that regular exposure to natural sunlight is therapeutic for the eyes. They state that UV light and infrared into the eye are beneficial, with infrared being healing and helping to build up melatonin in the eyes, which is described as one of the most powerful antioxidants in cells. The speaker asserts that the sun phobia is a huge mistake and that UV radiation to the eyes is not nearly a problem when protected. They recommend getting more light into work or study spaces and eating foods high in lutein and zeaxanthin, two carotenoids found in egg yolks, to support eye health.

The speaker discusses the relationship between sunlight, sunscreen, and skin cancer. They argue that lack of sunshine, rather than sunlight itself, causes skin cancer. They mention a new study that suggests it is UVA, not UVB, that causes cancer. They explain that using sunscreens that only block UVB can lead to vitamin D deficiency, which increases the risk of cancer. They emphasize the importance of maintaining normal vitamin D levels to reduce the risk of cancer. The speaker also criticizes sunscreens for containing potentially harmful chemicals that can be absorbed into the bloodstream and cause liver and skin damage. They advise against washing off vitamin D from the skin with soap after sun exposure. Additionally, they mention the importance of maintaining healthy skin bacteria.

The speaker discusses an article by Midwestern Doctor arguing that avoiding the sun is harmful. While relatively benign skin cancers are caused by sun exposure, the deadliest skin cancers are linked to lack of sunlight. Avoiding sunlight doubles one's rate of dying and increases cancer risk. The dermatology profession rebranded itself as skin cancer fighters in the 80s, but despite billions spent, skin cancer deaths haven't substantially decreased. Sunlight is critical for mental health; nurses lacking sun exposure had worse mental health. Studies showed higher UVB exposure correlated with lower breast cancer incidence in women and fatal prostate cancer in men. A Swedish study found sun avoidant women were 60% more likely to die. Nonsmokers avoiding the sun had the same mortality risk as smokers getting sunlight. The American Academy of Dermatology states one in five Americans will develop skin cancer, and approximately 9,500 people in the US are diagnosed with skin cancer every day. However, most are benign. The Academy encourages staying out of tanning beds and using sun protection. Basal cell carcinoma, linked to sun exposure, rarely metastasizes and has a near-zero fatality rate.

The speaker debunks the myth that the sun causes cancer, stating that it is actually sunscreen that can be harmful. They emphasize the importance of sunlight for overall health, as it provides vitamin D3 and keeps bones and skin healthy. The speaker advises against applying chemicals to the skin, but suggests using a little coconut oil for better sun exposure. They claim that sunlight is essential for the proper functioning of every cell in the body and that it can even help cure cancer. The speaker warns against using certain cosmetic products that contain harmful chemicals, which can lead to breast cancer. They conclude by stating that sunlight is the best preventive measure against disease.

Ultraviolet light is portrayed as dangerous and something to avoid at all costs. People live and work in environments blocking UV light through glasses, contacts, sunglasses, cars, offices, and artificial lighting. When exposed to the sun, sunscreen is applied, further blocking UV light. However, UV light activates vitamin D, negating the need for synthetic supplements. UV light also helps lower blood pressure and benefits the heart, arteries, and cholesterol. Additional benefits include assisting in weight loss, helping with skin conditions and other diseases, and boosting melatonin levels for better sleep. The claim is that an industry has been created to promote sun avoidance to benefit other industries.

Vitamin D is described as a "God-given miracle" essential to our natural design. While dermatologists often warn against sun exposure due to skin cancer risks, the speaker claims that more people die from lack of sun exposure and related cancers. The speaker asserts that adequate vitamin D levels can reduce all cancers by 50%. While supplements can raise vitamin D levels, the ideal method is sun exposure with minimal clothing, allowing the body to convert a cholesterol precursor into vitamin D. This process affects 10% of our genomics, optimizing our genes. UVA radiation is identified as the more dangerous type, while UVB radiation enables vitamin D production. Sunscreens filter UVB, hindering vitamin D synthesis, while allowing UVA to pass through, potentially increasing skin cancer risk. Studies allegedly show that sunscreen use increases the risk of skin cancer.

A Midwestern doctor discusses the negative effects of avoiding sunlight, emphasizing its importance for overall health. Sunlight exposure is linked to lower cancer rates and improved mental health. The dermatology profession's focus on skin cancer prevention may have led to misconceptions about the benefits of sunlight. Most skin cancers are treatable if detected early, and the risk factors vary based on sun exposure and genetics. Basal cell carcinoma, the most common form of skin cancer, rarely spreads and has a low fatality rate. Sunscreen and protective clothing are recommended for outdoor activities.

Speaker 0 argues that it was not until the 1960s, with the SPF push, that people were told not to go out in the sun. The claim is that Big Pharma created SPF and told people to avoid sun exposure, promoting petroleum-based sunscreens with many chemicals perceived as linked to illnesses the sunscreen is meant to prevent. The speaker asserts that, once you look at lawsuits, there are many cases claiming sunscreen causes skin cancer because of the chemicals baked into the skin for hours. The speaker describes observing people at pools and beaches who spray sunscreen all over their bodies and then questions why they experience acne, hormonal issues, low energy, fatigue, and infertility, suggesting that these problems stem from absorbing chemicals through the skin, noting that the skin is the largest organ. The claim is made that sunscreen makes no sense and that the sun heals, while pointing to the government’s ongoing efforts to block sunlight. The speaker asks why the government spends so much time blocking the sun and offers a rationale: if there were lots of sunshine, people would have revolutions. According to the speaker, cold weather keeps people indoors, watching Netflix and cuddling up, reducing the likelihood of revolt, whereas abundant sunshine would incite revolts, which is presented as the reason behind extensive sun-blocking efforts. Throughout, the speaker ties sunscreen use to broader social and political manipulation, presenting a narrative where the sun’s healing properties are real, sunscreen chemicals are harmful, and public policy is driven by a desire to suppress dissent. The overarching theme is that the sun is beneficial and that the promotion of sunscreen by Big Pharma in the 1960s represents a deliberate attempt to control people and prevent revolutions.

In a large longitudinal study, twenty-nine thousand five hundred and eighteen women were followed for twenty years to examine the health effects of sun exposure. The findings from this extensive cohort are presented as surprisingly provocative. First, the study concluded that avoiding sun exposure reduces life expectancy to the same extent as heavy smoking. This comparison underscores the potential importance of sun exposure for overall health and longevity, challenging common assumptions that minimizing sun would uniformly improve health outcomes. Second, the researchers initially hypothesized that greater sun exposure would lead to a higher risk of deadly skin cancer, specifically melanoma. However, the data did not show a strong link between sun exposure and melanoma. In other words, there was almost no correlation between the amount of sun exposure and the incidence of melanoma, the deadliest form of skin cancer, in this study’s findings. From the study’s results, it appears that moderate and frequent sun exposure may be beneficial for health, contradicting the idea that more sun exposure is inherently dangerous. The identified risk factors were limited to sunburn and excessive sun exposure, which were singled out as problematic rather than ordinary or moderate sunlight exposure. The overarching takeaway presented is that getting outside and obtaining sunshine can be advantageous for health, whereas guarding against sunburn and avoiding excessive sun exposure are the critical boundaries to observe. The speaker emphasizes the practical implication by repeating a straightforward recommendation: this is a friendly reminder to get outside and get some sunshine. Overall, the message hinges on two main points: the potential longevity benefits associated with sun exposure and the unexpectedly weak association between sun exposure and melanoma risk within this large cohort, paired with a caution about sunburn and excessive exposure. The narrative invites readers to reconsider conventional wisdom about sun exposure, highlighting that moderate and frequent exposure may be among the positive influences on health, with the caveat that protection against sunburn remains important.

Rodney discusses tanning, sharing his personal experience: he used to tan a lot and worked at Palm Beach Tan, tanning all the time. He notes that tanning “went away” after a tanning tax was introduced to pay for the Affordable Care Act. He says the tax meant “instead of incentivizing people to be healthy, they decided to tax the people who wanted to get some vitamin D into their body.” As a result, tanning beds began to fade. He adds that then tanning was said to be dangerous and toxic and people should avoid it, similar to messages about the sun. Consequently, the tanning industry was destroyed. He attributes the decline to both the tanning tax and “tanning fear” that was instilled in the public. Rodney mentions that tanning beds have existed since 1901, with various bulb types such as tanning bulbs, UV bulbs, quartz bulbs, and mercury arc bulbs. He claims that it all makes sense: if you have healthy people, they are a threat to a system that is “just trying to make money off of you the entire time.”