reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The questioner asked whether the public will learn the identities of the men who abused the girls connected to Epstein, with the information being released, and if not, why not; followed by a quick additional question. The questioner framed the issue as identifying the men who abused the young women through Epstein's activities. The official responded by challenging the assumption embedded in the question. They asked what it would mean to learn about “men that abuse these girls” and pressed to clarify that term. The official stated that, as of July and continuing to today, if the Department of Justice had information about men who abused women, they would prosecute them. They referenced ongoing work and restated that there is no “hidden tranche of information … that we know about, that we're covering up or that we're not prosecuting.” The official emphasized that they do not know whether there are men out there who abuse these women, noting uncertainty about whether such individuals exist or remain unidentified. The underlying point was that there is no claimed concealment of information or selective prosecution, and that the existence of further leads or prosecutions would be pursued if information were present.

I never realized how focusing on problems can make them worse until I read your book. It's called rumination, obsessing over pain, a key symptom of depression. Doing activities like exercise or running errands can help mental health by breaking this pattern. Cognitive behavioral therapists work to stop this habit, but some therapists encourage it.

Gabriel, an eight-year-old boy, described a pattern of abuse connected to his father, teachers, and other adults associated with his school and his family’s extended network. The interview centers on two main settings where the abuse occurred: a swimming pool in East Finchley and a school-related party, plus earlier incidents at home and with other adults. People involved - Gabriel and his family: His mother, known as Mama; his caregiver “Papa Hemp” (an adult referred to as Abraham who is described as Gabriel’s father figure and also as a father to him and his sister); his sister Emmy; his nanny Galina (also called Galina or Galina, Ukrainian/Russian family member who helps with cooking and housekeeping); other relatives such as Gabriel’s grandparents, including a Russian grandmother who lives outside England; a variety of named and unnamed extended family members. - Gabriel’s primary caregivers and household: Mama (the mother who is described as kind and supportive, who cooks, cleans, does juices, and provides money); Papa Hemp (the man Gabriel calls “dad” who does hemp juices and spends money on luxury items for Gabriel); Galina (the nanny, Ukrainian/Russian, who helps with pancakes and household tasks); Emmy (Gabriel’s sister); other adults in the household who are named less consistently. - School staff and associates: Christchurch Primary School in Hampstead where Gabriel says many teachers and staff were connected to his father. He names a number of teachers and staff by first and last names, including: - Miss Wilma (year one teacher, described as a friend of Gabriel’s father and the person who introduced him to other teachers). - Miss Forsyth (Kate Forsyth), the head teacher (Kate is her first name; Forsyth is the surname). - Miss Forsyth’s sister, also a head teacher, named Kate too (Kate Ungwyn or Ungwyn is referenced; the exact surname varies in the transcript). - Mr. Hollings (referred to as “mister Hollings,” the year four teacher who is to become Gabriel’s four-year teacher). - Miss Parsons (referred to as a leader among the teachers who knew Gabriel’s father). - Miss Clover and Miss Reese (assistants/teachers who were described as part of the staff). - Miss Wilma (again, described as a year one teacher who knew Gabriel’s father and who helped connect him with other staff). - Other staff names recur with uncertainty due to the chaotic transcript, but a broad network of teachers and school staff is repeatedly cited as being present during events. - Other adults at the events: Gabriel’s father’s friends, a man named Frank who is described as the McDonald’s manager or staff at the pool, and various parents who are named in relation to the disabled toilets incident. Key locations and settings - East Finchley Swimming Pool: Gabriel describes going there with his father (Papa Hemp) and his sister Emmy when he was about four years old. He recalls a changing room where his father and sister were present, and a disabled toilet where the abuse occurred. The pool complex is described as having a McDonald’s nearby and a McDonald’s inside the pool area itself, plus other facilities and a road and stairs near the pool. - The school and the school party: Gabriel recounts an incident on the last day of school in which a party at Christchurch Primary School involved sexual abuse. He describes a party that took place in the school, connected to a church space and school facilities, with dancing, and with teachers and parents present. He states that all the children attended the party and that many people, including teachers, parents, and his father’s friends, were involved in the abuse. He mentions a head teacher and other staff, including the year four teacher, present at the party. - Home and other settings: In the broader timeline, Gabriel refers to various other episodes including his mother’s explanations about anatomy (private parts, semen, the “white stuff” that comes out when wet or rubbed), and the risk and consequences described by his mother. He also describes exposure to alcohol, both wine and beer, provided by his father in various contexts; use of white powder to sniff; and other substances and behaviors introduced by his father and associates. Major events and claims - A pattern of sexual abuse initiated very early: Gabriel states that his father began abusing him when he was a baby or very young (one year old). He describes ongoing abuse across multiple settings, including at the pool and at home/with family friends. - The swimming pool incident: Gabriel details a recurrent pattern at the East Finchley Swimming Pool. He says his father and his father’s friends would take him and his sister into a large, multi-person disabled toilet, where they would perform sexual acts. He explains that the acts involved touching his private area, forcing him to put or be subjected to plastic Willy devices inserted into his bottom, which would bleed after removal. He says the acts occurred in the changing rooms, toilets, particularly the disabled toilet, and involved adults including his father, teachers, and parents who were there “in the disabled toilet” with him and his sister. He also mentions being taught to engage in sexual acts with other children at the pool and with other adults present. - The “plastic Willy” elements: Gabriel describes multiple “plastic willies” of different colors and sizes—bronze/dark skin color (brown), golden color, and white—for insertion into his bottom, describing the process as painful and bleeding after removal. He notes that the devices are made or bought by his father and his father’s associates; he references a person named Daniel as someone who helps make or procure the plastic toys. He emphasizes different color-coded descriptions for what he calls “brown/bronze,” “gold,” and “white.” - The teaching and social settings: Gabriel describes that his father had many connections with staff at the Christchurch Primary School, including Wilma, Forsyth (Kate), Ungwyn (Kate), Parsons, and others, suggesting that these relationships arranged or enabled the abuse. He states that the staff and parents were present at the pool events and at the school party, and that they engaged in or facilitated sexual activities with him and his sister. He describes that his father and the teachers would direct or coerce the children to participate in sexual activities, including oral sex on adults and other acts described in explicit terms. - The party day and the aftermath: The school party is described as lasting six hours and occurring during regular school hours, with a party atmosphere replacing standard lessons. Gabriel recalls being forced to engage in sexual acts at that party, being hit for crying, being injected with a sleeping injection by a nurse teacher so he would fall asleep, and being forced to participate in acts that included sexual contact with multiple adults, including his father, teachers, and other parents. He describes that his father killed babies and ate meat in a later part of the narrative about the party day, but the central focus is the party itself and the abuse that occurred there. - The “white powder” and alcohol: Gabriel recalls being given white powder to sniff by his father or adults, describing it as a substance that causes dizziness, headaches, and a “drunk” feeling. He describes European and Russian family connections as context for these experiences and mentions a green bottle with white powder in it. He also recounts receiving alcohol (white wine and red wine) from his father and feeling dizzy and headache-prone afterward, receiving tablets to alleviate symptoms. He notes that this happened when he was four years old and that his mother later admonished him not to put the white powder near his sister because it could cause babies to be born with severe problems. - The “seeds” and the white stuff: Gabriel describes the white stuff as being similar to semen in boys and having seeds that can multiply if they are brought into contact with another person or water. He explains that he was told to wash hands after handling the white stuff because the seeds can multiply, possibly causing pregnancy if transferred to another person. He emphasizes that the white substance can cause babies that might be blind, deaf, or otherwise disabled. He says his mother told him about the seeds and that it’s dangerous to expose his sister or others to the white stuff. - The self-harm and aggression: Gabriel recounts fighting with his sister, describing that following some of the episodes he engaged in violent acts toward his sister (hitting her, pulling her hair, etc.). He indicates these behaviors intensified after Abraham (Papa) moved in, and that his mother became very stressed as a consequence. He describes subsequent fear about reporting these events and the fear of retaliation by the adults involved, but then he begins to disclose earlier events. Rules and procedural notes from the interviewer - The interviewer (Steve) explains procedural rules for the interview: he is a police officer, with a partner described as Cleo who is the controller of the interview and a camera operator; there is Bethan from social services taking notes; the interview is structured to elicit truthfulness and precision, with an emphasis on avoiding guessing and on not considering Gabriel in trouble for reporting. - Gabriel is encouraged to use truthful accounts and to express himself with the language he chooses, including swear words, and the interviewer explicitly indicates that he would prefer him to supply the real terms (e.g., explicit sexual terms) to ensure accuracy in the record. - The interviewer confirms factual details like the date (11 September, a Thursday), the participants in the interview, and the structure of the interview. He also provides a mock example to illustrate truth-telling and asks Gabriel to identify lies and truths. - The interviewer clarifies that the purpose of the interview is to gather truthfully reported information about past incidents, including events that occurred at the pool, the school, and within the family network. Emotional and safety context - Gabriel communicates fear, confusion, and distress, especially around events at the pool and school. He alternates between recounting explicit acts and the broader social context of an abusive environment. He references fear of retaliation if the information is disclosed and expresses relief at having the opportunity to speak with an adult about what happened. - The narrative includes multiple references to consent, coercion, and the use of physical force to compel participation in sexual activities, as described by Gabriel. Overall content of claims - Gabriel reports extensive sexual abuse and coercion by his father, teachers, and other adults connected to the school and family circle, including forced sexual acts with both him and his sister. - He describes the use of plastic sexual devices inserted into his bottom, causing bleeding, and the performance of sexual acts in changing rooms and disabled toilets at the East Finchley Swimming Pool, in the presence of his father, teachers, and parents. - He recounts participation in a school party that involved sexual activities with multiple adults and a pattern of violence toward him for crying, as well as medical interventions (injections) to suppress crying. - He reports exposure to alcohol and illegal substances (white powder) given or introduced by his father, as well as instructions given by his mother about the dangers of the substances, including the propagation of seeds that could cause pregnancy and birth defects. - He describes a broader pattern of manipulation and complicity among adults at the school, including various named staff who allegedly knew his father and arranged or facilitated abuse. This summary condenses the key points and claims from Gabriel’s account, preserving the explicit statements and descriptions as provided in the transcript, without interpretation or judgment of the claims’ truthfulness.

At a young age, when someone touches your genitals, it can feel pleasurable even if you don't understand what it is. Some may argue that it's sexual assault, but I've always maintained that if the abuser is skilled, you may not even realize it's happening. The abuser can make you feel a certain way without you even knowing it.

If you're considering no contact, initiate it before fully deciding. Announcing it can reveal valuable information. If the person reacts by making it about themselves, steamrolling your feelings, or using guilt, that informs your decision. Alternatively, a response of love, respect for your space, and a commitment to self-improvement also provides insight. Experiment with no contact to gather data.

Speaker 0 asks the person what happened and what they were trying to do, specifically if they were trying to protect someone.

Here's a summary of the provided transcript: The speaker emphasizes that one doesn't need to trust them to utilize the information provided about the signs of sexual abuse. The speaker asserts that knowing these indicators is crucial for helping troubled children, regardless of the source. The key is whether one can recognize the signs or if personal biases prevent them from seeing the truth, hindering a child's disclosure and perpetuating the abuse. The speaker encourages listeners to verify the information independently, even though the speaker has experience working with sexual abuse victims. The speaker presents the information as a means to save time while urging individuals to assess the indicators and determine their validity.

Young people and their families need detailed information on physical interventions to make informed decisions. These discussions may be challenging but are necessary.

There are a few survivors who, for confidentiality reasons, cannot be named. They are currently receiving specialized trauma treatment and are not ready to speak out.

Patients often struggle to understand medical information and may not ask questions due to feeling deferential. Normalizing confusion and encouraging questions can improve the informed consent process, which is currently lacking ethically.

During twelve years of work, the speaker encountered no female patient who hadn't been sexually abused as a child. The speaker poses the question of who would choose to be sexually abused or traumatized in childhood, or aspire to become a drug addict and break the law. The speaker asserts that addiction is a response to pain, and that traumatic experiences shape the brain's physiology, biasing it towards addictive behaviors, including substance use.

The speaker became curious about self-destructive behaviors like cutting, excessive drinking, unsafe sex, and eating soap, seeking to understand their function without judgment. Individuals engaging in these behaviors seemed to instinctively know that these actions both helped and hurt them. Traditional models often viewed these behaviors as masochistic or maladaptive. The speaker notes a connection to polyvagal theory, suggesting the individuals' bodies recognized a benefit from these behaviors despite the harm they caused.

Self-injury involves cutting through previous scars, which stems from sexual abuse. It's a redirection where the greater pain wins. Serious self-cutters enter a dissociative state and don't feel the pain because an alter takes it. Within that person, male and female parts exist. For a female, male parts emerge as protective ones. A protective part might not identify with the body, questioning its female characteristics. This part might then seek medical consultation.

The session centers on an interview conducted by Steve (Barnet Police) with Alyssa, a nine-year-old girl whose full name is Alyssa Grace Gareva Dearman. Cleo is present as the controller, and a later portion involves Carl monitoring the session via a computer. The conversation oscillates between eliciting Alyssa’s memories about alleged abuse and the ongoing process of verifying what is true, what was suggested or coached, and what may have been invented or misremembered under pressure. Key participants and roles - Steve: police interviewer, explaining rules and guiding the interview. - Cleo: the facilitator of the session, taking notes and asking questions. - Alyssa (Grace): the child providing the account of alleged abuse and related details. - Abraham: a central adult figure in Alyssa’s narrative who allegedly manipulated, coerced, and abused her and her brother. - Mister Hollings, Miss Martin (headmistress), Mister Morris (the caretaker), and other school/church staff appear as part of a purported network in Alyssa’s accounts. - Papa Hemp: a man Alyssa says is a figure who sometimes presents himself as a paternal relation but whom Alyssa later criticizes. Structure and rules of the interview - The interview begins with introductions and setting: Alyssa’s full name, age, and preferred name. The purpose is to gather detailed recollections of events Alyssa remembers from a period when she wasn’t present (described as events around a Barnet/Barnett area, with a hospital/clinic context in some parts). - Rules emphasized: tell the truth, don’t guess, if you don’t know say so, and if you don’t understand a question ask for it to be rephrased. The interviewer explains that even the interviewer may seek clarification and that there will be an emphasis on exact language, including the use of rude words if necessary to convey what happened. - Alyssa is encouraged to be precise, to speak in detail about what she recalls, and to distinguish truth from lies, with a simple example about who drew a picture to illustrate truth vs. lie. Summary of Alyssa’s detailed accounts (with notable shifts and clarifications) - Family and living situation: - Alyssa lives with her mother (Ella Draper) on 5 Patterson Road, near Christchurch Primary School. Her older brother Gabriel is her sibling, and James is a half-brother who visits but does not live with them. Alyssa also mentions a “Papa Hemp” (Abraham) who lives with them at times, and a nanny, Galina (Galia), who helps with care. - Alyssa states that her father is Ricky, who she sees daily in some contexts while at school; she describes him as frequently present, particularly “at the school” and during other times. She indicates that her father sometimes lies to her mother about visitation; she reports that Ricky visits them daily at times and sometimes claims different visitation schedules. - School and routine: - Alyssa describes Christchurch Primary School and a campus layout that includes infant and junior sections, a staff room, a front office, and a kitchen/canteen area. She mentions a cafeteria/canteen kitchen and describes a door to a staff room where “they do sex” (her phrasing) as part of alleged abuse. - She recounts a specific alleged ritual where a secret room and a hidden wardrobe in a dining room lead to a concealed staircase to an underground area with cupboards. She asserts that in this secret basement, staff and Abraham perform abuse and murder. She mentions that the headmistress (Miss Martin) and another administrator ( Mister Hollings) are involved. - The church and “secret rooms” narrative: - The church adjacent to their school is portrayed as a facility where skulls are danced with during ceremonies. Alyssa describes two nurseries within the church complex, one of which contains a kitchen and a “big white bowl” and a “silver goblet” for collecting blood. She claims skulls are kept in a cupboard in the church, and that staff and parents are involved in ritual activities. - She describes a hidden passage in the church that leads to a secret underground room with cupboards, including weapons (cleavers and knives) and tools used in ritual activities. She indicates that the headmistress, the priest, and Abraham have access to these areas, and that staff have keys to the secret rooms. - Alyssa explains a hierarchy in which secrets are kept; staff have access via keys, and the headmistress exercises control over access to the cupboards and the skulls. - The alleged murder/abuse rituals: - Alyssa details alleged acts including tying a baby by the legs, head removal, blood collection into a bowl and goblet, and the use of bones to create statues or other items. She asserts that some bones are carved into church statues and that skulls are worn by adults in a ritual setting. - She describes a sequence in which babies are allegedly killed, with the head removed while hanging from a wall, and blood collected in a bowl. She claims that the blood is used in the canteen to “put baby meat” into meals, and bones are repurposed into statues by carvers such as Felix and Max. - She also alleges that children at the school are coerced to participate in violent acts and that some are sold to others for sex. She describes babies being injected by a nurse in the school, then decapitated, with body parts processed and used in rituals or for sale. - Trafficking and exploitation: - Alyssa claims that babies are sold to people who want to engage in sexual acts with children, and that she and Gabriel are kept in the school/police described environment and used for abuse for a price (she mentions £50). She says they are held and used in this system during school hours as well as during holidays, and that authorities from social services are involved in a network of trafficking through the church and school. - The Morocco context and the role of Abraham: - A large portion of the detailed accounts about abuse, including specific acts and the ritual environment, is linked to Morocco, where Abraham is described as pressuring, beating, and coercing Alyssa and Gabriel. She notes that Abraham’s actions included physical violence (spooning licks), threats of more severe harm, and attempts to force confessions. - Alyssa indicates that some of her most elaborate stories began after watching a film (Zorro) and receiving cues from Abraham about what to say to authorities. She acknowledges that some of the more fantastical elements (e.g., skulls, cannibalism, elaborate ritual chambers) were suggested by Abraham as part of deception to frighten her or to manipulate the truth. - Truth-telling and memory of lies: - Throughout, Alyssa differentiates between what she believes happened and what Abraham insisted she tell investigators. She admits she lied or embellished elements after Abraham pressed her to say certain things, especially about babies and skulls. She emphasizes that she is worried about getting in trouble for lying and notes that she was afraid of Abraham’s reactions. - She confirms that some parts she previously described (especially the church-based murder/ritual narratives) were not true, as confessed during the interview or later in the conversation. She recognizes that Abraham coached or coerced her to say things that were not accurate, though she also maintains that the Ace/secret-rooms narrative and the general structure of a dangerous environment around the church and school have elements that correspond to true experiences (e.g., the staff’s control, walk-throughs, and the presence of confidential areas). - Current status and next steps: - The interview concludes with an acknowledgment that Alyssa has told many stories, some of which were false as coached by Abraham. The investigators plan to separate the discussion from her mother to avoid pressure and to assess which parts of the story are true, which are embellished, and which are untruthful. - There is an explicit plan to verify elements of the story with other sources (e.g., the alleged houses, the church, and the school, and whether particular staff members exist or hold the described roles). There is mention of bringing Alyssa to medical evaluation to check for injuries, and there is attention to ensuring Alyssa’s safety and wellbeing moving forward. - Emotional and social context: - Alyssa describes a complex and distressing environment shaped by alleged abuse, coercion, fear, and dysfunction at home and at school. She mentions feelings of fear toward Abraham, fear of barriers to telling the truth, and fear of potential retaliation. She also discusses the involvement of her mother, who she says believes Abraham and often agrees with him, which complicates her ability to disclose fully. Overall, the transcript presents Alyssa recounting an alleged and extensive abuse scenario that encompasses home life, a school/church complex, and a network of adults including Abraham, Miss Martin, Mister Hollings, and others. The narrative includes explicit descriptions of sexual and violent abuse, trafficking of children, and ritualized acts, much of which Alyssa later indicates may have been influenced or orchestrated by Abraham, particularly during the Moroccan period of her life. The interview emphasizes truth-telling, acknowledges the potential for misinformation under duress, and lays out a plan for further verification, medical assessment, and protective steps for Alyssa and her brother.

The speaker expresses frustration that the other person brought up the "Marine doubt article." They feel they are being attacked and that the other person is going to use information against them regarding state support, which they believe is not the norm. The speaker is hesitant to provide information because of this fear. They suggest scheduling a visit and talking with a therapist, as they do not want to continue arguing or make things worse.

Emily Tarsell, Christina’s mother, shares that Christina had a great curiosity about life, was an athlete, an artist, and a philosopher. At 20, they visited a gynecologist who said Gardasil would be safe and effective and would prevent cervical cancer. Christina began to develop symptoms after each shot; she reported a rash, fatigue, and dizziness within a few days of the third shot. Eighteen days after the Gardasil shot, she was found dead in her bed. The last time Emily saw Christina was when she hugged her as Christina went back to work training on campus for the summer. Emily and her family filed a federal claim because Gardasil was approved by the FDA, and she explains that if you have reason to believe your daughter died from a product, you want to hold people accountable. Merck responded to requests for comment by defending Gardasil, stating its safety was established in clinical trials involving more than 25,000 females and males, and that they continued studying more than 500,000 people after more than a million doses had been administered. They urged parents to look to the CDC and FDA and to the advice of their physicians to make an informed choice because of the vaccine’s safety data. Doctor Diane Harper, a professor at the University of Louisville and an international expert on HPV prevention, describes her initial excitement about a vaccine as a cancer prevention tool, especially for countries without screening. She then outlines concerns: Gardasil does not last long enough to prevent cervical cancer, and HPV infections can continue throughout life. CDC and other data show that HPV is most often sexually transmitted, but between birth and age 11, 10 to 15 percent of children are already infected with high-risk types. There is cutaneous transmission—skin-to-skin—whose sources could be parental, babysitters, or other environmental contact; the exact mode is uncertain. Harper says Gardasil is an option, not a definitive prevention, and that there are harms associated with it. She emphasizes the importance of pap screening, now with HPV testing and cytology together, which provides nearly a hundred percent capability to find precancers that can be treated with a cure, and to detect cancers. She notes that even with vaccination, pap screening remains essential due to other HPV types. For boys, HPV can lead to anal, penile, and head-and-neck cancers, with anal cancer rates in men who have sex with men approaching cervical cancer rates prior to pap testing; however, overall efficacy and duration of protection from vaccines is limited, with trials lasting three years and long-term protection potentially not lasting beyond five years for those vaccinated at 13. Emily reflects that this is the reason she is speaking out, calling it an outrage and urging people to take responsibility for finding out. The program thanks Emily and Dr. Harper for sharing Christina’s story and their insights.

I didn't think I was just going to be killed; I expected other things to happen to me as well. So, you believed you might also be raped? Yes, I did. And now you understand that this fear stems from your experience? Yes, I think so.

Some survivors are not willing to speak out due to their ongoing specialized trauma treatment. They are currently experiencing disorientation.

Written documentation has revealed the names of people involved in mind control research, along with their research projects and statements. It's important to note that victims may have been intimidated into silence about their experiences. As a therapist specializing in trauma, I've been contacted by 40 therapists across the country who shared stories from clients subjected to radiation and mind control experiments. The consistency of these stories regarding techniques like electric shock, hallucinogens, sensory deprivation, hypnosis, limb dislocation, and sexual abuse is striking. There is very little published information on this topic, and these clients have had no contact with each other.